Professional Documents
Culture Documents
www.ijmer.com
Vol.2, Issue.6, Nov-Dec. 2012 pp-4244-4255
ISSN: 2249-6645
I. INTRODUCTION
Structural frames are primarily responsible for
strength and rigidity of buildings. For simpler single storey
structures like warehouses, garages etc portal frames are
usually adequate. It is estimated that about 50% of the hotrolled constructional steel used in the UK is fabricated into
single-storey buildings (Graham and Alan, 2007). This
shows the increasing importance of this fundamental
structural assemblage. The analysis of portal frames are
usually done with predetermined equations obtained from
structural engineering textbooks or design manuals. The
equations in these texts were derived with an underlying
assumption that deformation of structures due to axial
forces is negligible giving rise to the need to undertake this
study. The twenty first century has seen an astronomical use
of computers in the analysis of structures (Samuelsson and
Zienkiewi, 2006) but this has not completely eliminated the
use of manual calculations form simple structures and for
easy cross-checking of computer output (Hibbeler, 2006).
Hence the need for the development of equations that
capture the contribution of axial deformation in portal
frames for different loading conditions.
= 31
41
51
61
12
22
32
42
52
62
13
23
33
43
53
63
14
24
34
44
54
64
15
25
35
45
55
65
16
26
36
.
46
56
66
(1)
12 = 0
www.ijmer.com
4244 | Page
62
1
2
3
{} =
4
5
6
14 =
121
3
15 = 0
16 =
22 =
23 =
(5)
62
2
121
3
1
2
{} = 3
4
5
6
61
2
24 = 0
25 =
(2)
(6)
26 = 0
33 =
42
34 =
41
62
44 =
22
45 = 0
46 =
55 =
62
2
121
3
= + 1 1 + 2 2 + 3 3 .
122
{ }
{ } = 30
40
50
60
. (7)
35 = 0
36 =
(3)
(8)
(4)
www.ijmer.com
4245 | Page
1
11
121 2 1
1 1 3 +62 1 2 +241 2
33
2
22 33 23
(9)
32
2
22 33 23
22
. .
= 2
31 2 (1 +22 )
2 2
3
4
2 1 +31 +2 2 +61 2
= 2
31 2 2 2
2 2
3
4
2 1 +31 +2 2 +61 2
(15a)
(15c)
1 2 22 3 +31
3
22 1 +312 2 +2 4 2 +61 2
(15b)
(15d)
2
22 33 23
1 1 3 +62 1 2 +121 2
121 2 1
12 = 0 .
13 = 0 .
22 =
23 =
33 =
2
1
1 2
.
.
1 +2 2
(10a)
. .
31 2
. .
22 3 +31
(10b)
(10c)
(10d)
(10e)
(10f)
11
21
31
11
21
31
10
1
2 + 20 = 0 .
3
30
i.e. + = 0 .
1 =
(12)
1 = 0
0
81
(17b)
30 =
2 (1 +62 )
241 2
(17c)
3 =
(18a)
2 1 2 3
22 3 1 +312 2 +2 4 2 +61 2
(18b)
(18c)
= 12
22 3 1 +312 2 +2 4 2 +61 2
= 24
22 3 1 +312 2 +2 4 2 +61 2
. .
(19)
2 3 1 2 3 2 +31
. .
(20)
(21)
33
32
2
22 33 23
23
2
22 33 23
22
2
22 33 23
2
22 33 23
(16)
(13)
(Stroud, 1995)
11
22
(11b)
20 =
2 = 4
.
10 = 0 .
.
(17a)
1 = 0 .
(11a)
= + 1 1 + 2 2 + 3 3 .
(14)
=
=
www.ijmer.com
2 3 1 2 3 2 +31
24 22 3 1 +312 2 +2 4 2 +61 2
3 1 82 3 +2 3 1
12 4 3 2 21 + 2 +2 3 1 1 +2 2
4246 | Page
. .
12 22 3 1 +312 2 +2 4 2 +61 2
(22)
30 =
61
. .
(30c)
10 =
128 1 2 1
22
20 =
161
2 (1 +62 )
30 =
481 2
(23a)
(23b)
(23c)
3 =
32 1 1 3 +62 1 2 +24 1 2
(24a)
2 2 3 2 1
22 3 1 +312 2 +2 4 2 +61 2
3 2 2 3 2 +21 +3 3 1 1 +6 2
48 22 3 1 +312 2 +2 4 2 +61 2
2
Let = .
64
48 22 3 1 +312 2 +2 4 2 +61 2
64
2 1 1 3 +51 2 2 +241 2
(24c)
. (25)
4 1 51 +24 2
1 1 3 +62 1 2 +241 2
. .
48 22 3 1 +312 2 +2 4 2 +61 2
3 2 2 1
3
2 1 1 +62 1 2 +24 1 2
64 1 1 3 +62 1 2 +24 1 2
2 3 2 3 2 +21 +31 1 +62
=
2
. .
20 =
121
4
81
.
.
+ 24
(32)
3 2 3 2 +121
22 3 1 +312 2 +2 4 2 +61 2
(34)
3 9 2 1 2 +52 3 2 +121 2
3 2 2 1
3
1 1 +62 1 2 +241 2
1 =
+
. .
.
.
3 2 2 1
30 = 0
(28)
+ 24
22 3 1 +312 2 +2 4 2 +61 2
(35)
2
21
.
.
(36a)
(36b)
.
.
6 2 2 1
3
2
1 1 +61 2 +24 1 2
2 = 0
(29)
. .
22 3 1 +312 2 +2 4 2 +61 2
=
2
(36c)
64 1 1 3 +62 1 2 +24 1 2
2 3 2 3 2 +81 +31 1 +62
48 22 3 1 +312 2 +2 4 2 +61 2
10 =
(31c)
3 2 3 2 +121
+ 24
1 1 3 +62 1 2 +241 2
20 = 0 .
(33)
10 =
48 22 3 1 +312 2 +2 4 2 +61 2
3 2 3 1 1 +8 2 2 1 +641 2
(27)
3 2 3 1 1 +8 2 2 1 +641 2
(31b)
1 1 3 +62 1 2 +24 1 2
2 3 2 3 2 +21 +31 1 +62
22 3 1 +312 2 +2 4 2 +61 2
(24b)
(26)
4 1 51 +24 2
(31a)
.
=
3 2 3 2 +121
3 = 24
.
=
. .
4 2 31 +2 2
3
22 1 +312 2 +2 4 2 +61 2
2 = 8
2 1 1 3 +62 1 2 +24 1 2
3 9 2 1 2 +52 3 2 +121 2
24 22 3 1 +312 2 +2 4 2 +61 2
3 3 1 1 +8 2 2 1 +641 2
2 = 16
3 2 1
3
2
1 1 +62 1 +24 1 2
1 =
(30a)
3 = 0 .
.
. .
.
.
.
.
(37a)
(37b)
(37c)
(30b)
www.ijmer.com
4247 | Page
3 2 2 1
3
2
1 1 +61 2 +24 1 2
3 2 2 2 1
3
2
1 1 +61 2 +24 1 2
(38)
(39)
10 =
20 =
3 2 2 2 1
3
2
1 1 +61 2 +241 2
= 1
.
.
3
2
1 1 +61 2 +24 1 2
(41)
10 = 4
2 3
20 =
61
2
30 = 2
(42b)
(42c)
3 =
1 =
2 = 2
22 3 1 +312 2 +2 4 2 +61 2
1 +2 2
.
.
21 2
3 2 2 2 1
(43b)
2 22 3 1 +312 2 +2 4 2 +61 2
3 2 2 2 1
2 1 1 3 +62 1 2 +24 1 2
+2
3 2 1 2
(49b)
3 2 21 + 2 +31 1 +2 2
(49c)
2 22 3 1 +312 2 +2 4 2 +61 2
+
(50)
2 1 1 32 +6 2 1 +21
(51)
2 1 1 32 +6 2 1 +21
2 1 1 3 +62 1 2 +24 1 2
3 2 21 +2 +31 1 +2 2
2 22 3 1 +312 2 +2 4 2 +61 2
+
. .
(52)
=
.
2 1 1 3 +62 1 2 +24 1 2
2 3 1 + 2 +31 +31 1 +2 2
2 22 3 1 +312 2 +2 4 2 +61 2
. (44)
2 2 3 2 + 2 2 +31
2 1 1 32 +6 2 1 +21
(53)
(45)
3 2 2 2 1
3
1 1 +62 1 2 +241 2
(49a)
(43c)
22 3 1 +312 2 +2 4 2 +61 2
22 3 1 +312 2 +2 4 2 +61 2
= +
2 1 1 3 +62 1 2 +24 1 2
2 2 1 3 2 +2 22 3 2 2 +31
(48c)
2 1 1 3 +62 1 2 +24 1 2
2 3 1 + 2 +31 +31 1 +2 2
2 22 3 1 +312 2 +2 4 2 +61 2
1 1 3 +62 1 2 +24 1 2
2 22 3 1 +312 2 +2 4 2 +61 2
(48b)
2 1 1 32 +62 1 +21
= +
(43a)
.
22 3 1 +312 2 +2 4 2 +61 2
3 = 2
. .
2 2 1 3 + 2 3 2
2 2 3 2 + 2 2 +31
1 =
2 = 2
(42a)
(48a)
21
(40)
121 2 1
30 =
3 2 2 1
2 1 1 3 2 +6 2 1 +21
+2
2 2 3 2 + 2 2 +31
22 3 1 +312 2 +2 4 2 +61 2
(46)
3 2 2 2 1
2 1 1 3 +62 1 2 +241 2
2 2 1 3 2 +2 22 3 2 2 +31
2 22 3 1 +312 2 +2 4 2 +61 2
(47)
2 =
121
3
122
3
12
= 2 1 .
1
12
= 2 2 .
2
(54)
(55)
4248 | Page
3 1
12
19)
19 2 =0)
4 3 2 +2 3 1
3
4 2 21 + 1 +2 3 1 1 +2 2
1
21 + 2
(56)
V. CONCLUSION
The flexibility method was used to simplify the analysis
and a summary of the results are presented in table 1. The
equations in table 1 would enable an easy evaluation of the
internal stresses in loaded rigidly fixed portal frames
considering the effect of axial deformation.
From a detailed analysis of frame 1 (Figure 3), it was
observed that the contribution of axial deformation is
generally very small and can be neglected for reasonable
values of 1 2 . However, its contribution skyrockets at
very low values of i.e. as => 0. This depicts the
case of an encased single span beam and a complete
departure from portal frames under study. This analysis can
be extended to the other loaded frames (Figures 4 8) using
the equations in Table 1. These would enable the
determination of safe conditions for ignoring axial
deformation under different kinds of loading.
REFERENCES
[1]
www.ijmer.com
4249 | Page
S/No
LOADED FRAME
REMARKS
www.ijmer.com
4250 | Page
= = 12 4 3
3
2 21 + 2 +2 1 1 +2 2
= = 12 4 3
3 1 82 3 +2 3 1
3
2 21 + 2 +2 1 1 +22
= =
2 3 1 2
= = 4 3
3
2 21 + 2 +2 1 1 +22
2 4 3 2 3 2 +81 + 3 1 1 1 +62 2
48 4 3 2 21 + 2 +2 3 1 +22
= 64
=
=
=
4 51 +242
2 1 +6 2 2 +21 3 2
31 3 +242 2 +161 3 2
64 1 3 +62 2 +21 3 2
4 5 1 +24 2
64 2 1 +6 2 2 +21 3 2
2 4 3 2 3 2 +21 +2 3 1 1 +6 2
48 4 3 2 2 1 + 2 +2 3 1 1 +22
2 4 3 2 3 2 +21 +2 3 1 1 +62
48 4 3 2 2 1 + 2 +2 3 1 1 +2 2
2 4 3 2 3 2 +81 + 3 1 1 1 +62 2
48 4 3 2 21 + 2 +2 3 1 +22
3 3 1 +24 2 2 +161 3 2
32 3 1 +6 2 2 +21 3 2
= = 2 4 3
31 3 +242 2 +161 3 2
64 1 3 +62 2 +21 3 2
2 3 1 2
3
2 21 + 2 +2 1 +22
2 1 3 +5 2 2 +22 3 2
=
= 2
2 1 3 +6 2 2 +21 3 2
3 2 2
1 3 +6 2 2 +21 3 2
= 2
=
3
2 21 + 2 +2 1 1 +2 2
3 2 4 3 2 +2 3 1
3
2 21 + 2 +2 1 1 +2 2
+ 6 4 3
3 2 2
1 3 +6 2 2 +21 3 2
3 2 2
2 1 3 +6 2 2 +21 3 2
= =
3 2 9 2 1 +5 3 2 +2 3 1
+ 6 4 3
+ 6 4 3
3 2 4 3 2 +2 3 1
3
2 2 1 + 2 +2 1 1 +22
3 2 9 2 1 +5 3 2 +2 3 1
6 4 3 2 21 + 2 +2 3 1 1 +2 2
3 2
3
2
3
1 +62 +21 2
www.ijmer.com
4251 | Page
4 2 31 +22
2 4 3 2 21 + 2 +2 3 1 1 +2 2
3 2 2
3
2
3
1 +6 2 +21 2
3 2 2 2
3
2
3
1 +6 2 +21 2
= 1
=
3 2 2 2 1
= 1
3
2
1 1 +61 2 +241 2
3
2
3
1 +6 2 +21 2
6 2 2
= = 3
HD
3 2 2
= =
2
3
1 +6 2 +21 2
= + 2
= 2
3 2 2 2
1 3 +6 2 2 +21 3 2
= 2
=
2 41 2 3 +2 8 3 2 4 3 2 +2 3 1
2 4 3 2 21 + 2 +2 3 1 1 +22
2 2 4 3 2 +4 2 2 +2 3 1
3
2 21 + 2 +2 1 1 +2 2
+ 2 4 3
3 2 2 2
1 3 +6 2 2 +21 3 2
3 2 2 2
2 1 3 +6 2 2 +21 3 2
= =
=
3 2 2 2
1 3 +6 2 2 +21 3 2
2 2 4 3 2 +4 2 2 +2 3 1
3
2 2 1 + 2 +2 1 1 +22
+ 2 4 3
+
2 41 2 3 +2 8 3 2 4 3 2 +2 3 1
2 4 3 2 21 + 2 +2 3 1 1 +2 2
3 2 2
3 1 +6 2 2 +21 3 2
2 2 2 1 3 +2 3 2
4 3 2 21 +2 3 1 1 +22
www.ijmer.com
4252 | Page
2 1 32 + 2 6 +1 2
2 1 3 +6 2 2 +21 3 2
2 1 3 +6 2 2 +21 3 2
2 1 32 + 2 6 +1 2
2 1 3 +6 2 2 +21 3 2
2 1 32 +62 +1 3 2
4 3 2 1 +2 +31 +2 3 1 1 +22
2 4 3 2 21 +2 +2 3 1 1 +22
4 3 2 21 + 2 +2 3 1 1 +2 2
2 4 3 2 21 + 2 +2 3 1 1 +2 2
4 3 2 21 + 2 +2 3 1 1 +2 2
2 4 3 2 21 + 2 +2 3 1 1 +2 2
4 3 2 1 + 2 +31 +2 3 1 1 +22
2 4 3 2 21 + 2 +2 3 1 1 +2 2
3 1 +6 2 2 +21 3 2
= =
2 1 3 +6 2 2 +21 3 2
2 1 32 + 2 6 +1 2
=
=
2 1 32 +2 6 +1 2
6 2 1 2
4 3 2 21 + 2 +2 3 1 1 +2 2
w =1kN/m L = 5m H = 0.4m h = 4m
-0.0045
-0.0095
-0.0144
-0.0192
-0.0241
10
-0.0289
-0.0337
-0.0384
-0.0432
-0.0479
w =1kN/m L = 5m H = 0.4m h = 4m
-0.0066
-0.0135
-0.0201
-0.0267
-0.0332
10
-0.0396
-0.0460
-0.0524
-0.0587
-0.0651
2 = 0.296
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
-3.1250
-0.5409
-0.0823
-0.0239
-0.0096
-0.0047
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
-0.0026
-0.0015
-0.0010
-0.0006
-0.0004
4253 | Page
2 = 0.296
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
-4.1667
-0.7668
-0.1208
-0.0359
-0.0146
-0.0072
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
-0.0040
-0.0024
-0.0015
-0.0010
-0.0007
www.ijmer.com
4254 | Page
www.ijmer.com
4255 | Page