ABSTRACT

The cyborg, a combination of hardware, software and wetware, stands as one of the most visible figures of the cybernetic age. A combination of two words, cybernetic and organism, the term cyborg refers to a biological being with a kinetic state that can be transferred with ease from one environment to another, able to adapt to changing environments through technological augmentation. The first living cyborg to find its way into the human family tree was a rat. With the emergence of the world wide web, the cyborg has strategically evolved in our imaginations as a metaphor of our times. Kevin Warwick, a professor of cybernetics and robotics, in his autobiography, I CYBORG,unveils how he became the first human cyborg through a series of path-breaking experiments. He begins his narrative by saying, I was born human. But this was an accident of fate- a condition of time and place. I believe its something we have the power to change. In this report, i seek to explore the possibility of formulating the cyborg as an author or translator, who is able to navigate between the different binaries of meatmachine, digital-physical, using the abilities and the capabilities learnt in one system in an efficient and effective understanding of the other. What does the cyborg as a translator add to our understanding the process of translation? How does the figure of the translating cyborg enable an analysis of the cyborg as materially bound and geographically contained, rather then the earlier ideas of the cyborg as residing in a state of universal placelessness. Also this paper does a close reading of an instance of particular cyberspatial form-the social networking system-to illustrate the dual processes of translation and the textuality of the texts involved.
1

INTRODUCTION
The computer is now making possible the augmentation of the human being. For the first time,through electronic technology, human biology is no longer destiny. Through bionic prostheses, bio-implants and biochips electronic technology can be integrated into human organism, projects like the Human Genome Initiative are made possible by the use of massive supercomputers allowing the operators of DNA sequencers to practice new form of positive eugenics previously unrealizable by any propagandists for the master race. New forms of human-computer interfaces are making possible human-computer interaction that rivals the most imaginative descriptions from science fiction. Though this technology seems science-fictional, there have always been electronic medical devices available for people ever since the civil war. People are already benefiting from pacemakers, artificial hearts, prosthetic limbs, hearing aids and hormone-producing implants such as Norplant. These technologies interface with the human nervous system and other biological system at the most basic level. Nanotechnology and Nanomachines may be able to affect biological changes at the intercellular level, causing changes in the human biological structure that might be unprecedented. It is disturbing but perhaps at least acceptable for people to face the fact that they have a large degree of kinship with other forms of life on the planet, and that their genes might be interchangeable with all of its myriad species. However, bioelectronics research suggests a kinship between humans and computers that is perhaps even more troubling. While cognitive scientists and artificial life researchers have alluded to this kinship in theoretical ways, bioelectronics
2

researchers are demonstrating it in a very practical way in the laboratory. The integration of biological and electronic processes suggests that they may be very similar in their mode of operation, and only based on different physical constituents. Interest in technologizing the human body did not begin with the invention of the computer, however. The concern with control and mastery over human performance began in military and only later spilled over into economic production with the introduction of scientific Taylorism and its time-motion studies onto the factory floor. Information theory began to be applied to vexing problems in linguistics, sociology, phychology and education. But the military and captains of industry wanted more. Where autonomous robots and AIs would not do, it became essential to upgrade the performance, efficiency and utility of human beings in carrying out directives. Science fiction clearly has been fascinated about the integration of the organic and the technological for a long time. One of the first incarnations of the artificial human was the robot or android,which made its first appearance in the movie Metropolies in the 1920s.But such robots were often simple pure electronic devices molded into a humanoid form, but there is no organic component. However by 1960s,science fiction writers had turned into a more imaginative construct, the cyborg. This being was a sort of hybrid, a mesh of flesh and steel, neurons and wires, blood and circuits. It was a human being partially transformed into a machine. While some of this technology remains the domain of science fiction, some of it is appearing here and now today, in the form of exoskeletons, artificial limbs and prostheses, biological implants and electronic devices for restoring vision to blind.
3

CYBORGS
A cybernetic organism (cyborg) is a biological creaturegenerally a human being whose functioning has been enhanced through integration of mechanical, electrical, computational, or otherwise artificial, components.Presentations of humanmachine hybrids have frequently acted as tropics in social arguments and literary imaginations that attempt to conceive the proper roles and deeper meaning of humans themselves, of machines, of the moral worth of each, and of the interactions among them. Following the popularization of the term cyborg, especially in science fiction of the 1960s and 1970s, a number of further neologisms with the cyber- prefix have developed that refer chiefly back to cyborgs, rather than directly to cybernetics. These include cyberpunk (fiction), cyberfeminism (theory), cyberspace (electronic networks).Indeed, ad hoc usage of the prefix is common in journalism and popular writing. The fact is that many of us are low-level cyborgs at this moment. Artificial organs (hearts, kidneys), implanted pacemakers, cochlear implants, artificial joints, and on and on show that we arent (generally speaking) morally or ethically opposed to using substitute parts to enhance our biological bits. Really, its just a matter of degree.What will it take to adapt to space? If we remove cosmic radiation from the equation, there are two major problems with low-gee habitation: bone loss and muscle atrophy. The fact is that the human body adapts very readily to low-gee conditions. Too readily. After only a few years, returning to a gravity environment becomes increasingly problematic.

TECHNOLOGY AND FORMS OF CYBORGS

Organic capabilities enhanced in cyborgs vary in kind, as well as in extent. The enhancements addressed in fiction or essaysor, indeed, by practiced technologies follow both the rhetorical or literary purposes of their creator and the evolving state of societal technical capabilities. With inventions in genomics and nanotechnology at the start of the 21st century, visions of cyborgs often discuss augmentation of human health and longevity.Diverse thinkers set very different boundaries for what artificial additions make a human into a cyborg. In a broad sense, all humans in the last several thousand years been intimately shaped by the utilization and presence of technologies around them, or physically manipulated or attached to them. A spear, or even a stick, extends human capabilities for hunting or warfare; writing extends human memory, cognition,and information transmission. Inclusive thinkers, including those embracing the labeltranshumanism, focus on this broadest sense, usually with the intention of extending human-machine interactivity. The everyday embodied cyberspace cyborg thus becomes subject to the state as well as the technology.People who enter the digital matrices are made accountable for their actions and travels in cyberspace. There is an increased anxiety around monitoring these process of translation, of reverse translation and production of translated cyborg identities that are becoming such an integral part of cyberspatial platforms. The virtual avatars are re-mapped onto the body of the user, thus reconfiguring the notion of the self and the body. The state, through its efforts, becomes a major player in the authoring of the cyberspace cyborg.

Cyborgs were a minor research area in cybernetics,usually classified under the heading of medical cybernetics, in the USA and Britain from the publication of Wieners Cybernetics in 1948 to the decline of cybernetics among scientists in the 1960s.During that period cybernetics held multiple interpretations of their field.Most of the research on cybernetics focused on the analogy between humans and machines-the main research method of cybernetics-not the fusion of humans and machines,the domain of cyborgs.Although many cyberneticians in the USA and Britain vieved cybernetics as a universal discipline, they created contested, area-specific interpretations of their field undr the metadiscourse of cybernetics.

FOUR KINDS OF CYBORGS

There are mainly four kinds of cyborgs. They can be classified as, Restorative Normalizing Reconfiguring Enhancing Cyborg technologies can be restorative in that they restore lost functions and replace lost organs and limbs. They can be normalizing in that they restore some creatures to indistinguishable normality. They can be reconfiguring, creating posthuman creatures equal to but different from human,like what one is now when interacting with other creatures in cyberspace or in the future the type of modifications proto-humans will undergo to live in space or under the sea having given up the comforts of terrestrial existence, and they can be enhancing, the aim of most military and industrial research and what those with cyborg envy or even cyborgphilia fantasize. The latter category seeks to construct everything from factories controlled by a handful of worker-pilots and infantrymen in mindcontrolled exoskeletons to the dream many computer scientists have downloading their consciousness into immortal computers.

CYBORG PERFORMANCE
Cyborgs are a very complex creation of the future. The general concept is that they cannot be recognized as non-humans. Although it has a programmed mission,this unit thinks and reacts on its own.The understructure is made of very strong material that resists many dangers,for example,gunshots and fire. Cyborgs are selfcontained unit under a layer of human flesh.The layer of human flesh that covers the frame is a biological organism.It has different layers and has a capillary system that is flowing with blood. Its difficult to imagine technology as an extension of our bodies, of ourselves. We use technology,we exercise all of a piece of a technologys resources,and then we dispose of it and replace it with a new, and frequently more advanced technology. But if examined closely,it is evident that technology is not just a means of achieving desired results,but has become an integral and essential part of our lives.Shirts,heating,forks,machines, all of these are technologies that we use to enhance ourselves and our lives.In books the trerm cybernetics is used to describe computer gadgets and electrical physical enhancements,like robotic arms.However,cybernetics is more encompassing than that, and includes anything we use to enhance our natural state. In this regard, clothing, utensils, and the simple machines we use in our homes all count as cybernetic enhancements.

CYBORGS ARE ALREADY HERE

8

1.Cyborgs actually do exist.About 10% of the current US population are estimated to be cyborgs in the technical sense,including people with electronic pacemakers,artificial joints,drug implant system,implanted corneal lenses and artificial skin.A much higher percentage participates in occupations that make them into metaphoric cyborgs, including the computer keyboard joined in a cybernetic circuit with the screen, the neurosurgeon guided by fiber optic microscopy during an operation, and then the teen gameplayer in the videogame arcarde.Terminal identity Scott Bukatman has named this condition, calling it an unmistakably doubled articulation that signals the end of traditional concepts of identity even as it points towards the cybernetic loop that generates a new kind of subjectivity. 2.This merging of the evolved and the developed, this integration of the constructor and the constructed,these systems of dying flesh and undead circuits, and of living and artificial cells have been called many things,bionic systems,vital machines,cyborgs.But the story of cyborgs is not just a tale told around the glow of television fire. There are many actual cyborgs among us in society.Anyone with an artificial organ limb or suppluiment,anyone reprogrammed to resist disease or drugged to think/behave/feel better is technically a cyborg.

CYBORGS AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

Artificial Intelligence (AI) as characterized by Julian Hilton is the attempt to replicate in machines the reasoning and imaginative powers of the human brain. Hilton points out that works on AI projects Presupposes that we have some knowledge of what these powers are. AI may learn a great deal from examining the theatres extended investigation into the nature of human intelligence.

KEVIN WARWICK I, CYBORG

10

Professor Kevin Warwick , the worlds leading expert in cybernetics who became the worlds first cyborg in a ground breaking set of scientific experiments. The cybernetic pioneer who is upgrading the human body started with himself. Humans have limited capabilities. Human sense the world in a restricted way, vision being the best of senses. Human understand the world only in three dimensions and communicate in a very slow, serial fashion called speech. The possibility exists to enhance human capabilities, to harness the ever increasing capabilities of machine intelligence, to enable extra sensory input and to communicate in a much richer way using thought alone. Kevin Warwick has taken the first steps on this path, using himself as a guinea pig test subject receiving by surgical operation, technological implant.

On 24th August 1998, Professor Kevin Warwick surgically transponder Tilehurst underwent implant in his an a operation silicon to chip

forearm.Dr.George anaesthetic

Boulous carried out the operation at surgery,using only.This experiment allowed a computer to monitor Kevin Warwick as he moved through halls and offices of the Department of Cybernetics at the university of Reading,using a unique identifying signal emitted by the implanted chip.He could operate doors,lights,heaters and other computers without lifting a finger.

11

On the 14th march 2002, a one hundred electrode array was surgically implanted into the median nerve fibres of the left arm of professor Kevin Warwick. The operation was carried out at Raddiffe Infirmary by a team headed by the neurosurgeons Amjad Shad and Peter Teddy. The procedure which toot a little over two hours involved inserting a guiding tube into a two inch incision made above the wrist, inserting a microelectrode array into this tube and firing it into the median nerve fibres below the elbow joint.

A number of experiments have been carried out using the signals detected by the array, most notably professor Warwick was able to control an electric wheelchair and an intelligent artificial hand developed by Dr.Peter Keyberd uging this neural interface.In addition to being able to measure the nerve signals transmitted down Professor Warwicks left arm, the implant was also able to create artificial sensation by stimulating individual electrodes within the array. This was demonstrated with the aid of Kevins wife Irena and a second, less complex implant connecting to her nervous system.

12

Another important aspect of the work undertaken as part of this project has been to monitor the effects of the implant on Professor Warwicks hand functions. This was carried out by Allesio Murgia,a research student at the department, using the Southampton Hand Assessment Procedure(SHAP) test. By testing hand functionality during the course of the project the difference between the performance indicators before, during and after the implant was present in Kevins arm can be used to give a measure of the risks associated with this and future cyborg experiments.

WHERE ARE THE CYBORGS IN CYBERNETICS?

13

Cyborgs cybernetic organisms, hybrids of humans and machines have pervaded everyday life, the military, popular culture, and the academic world since the advent of cyborg studies in the mid 1980s. They have been a recurrent theme in STS in recent decades, but there are surprisingly few cyborgs referred to in the early history of cybernetics in the USA and Britain. In this paper, I analyze the work of the early cyberneticians who researched and built cyborgs. I then use that history of cyborgs as a basis for reinterpreting the history of cybernetics by critiquing cyborg studies that give a teleological account of cybernetics, and histories of cybernetics that view it as a unitary discipline. I argue that cyborgs were a minor research area in cybernetics, usually classified under the heading of `medical cybernetics', in the USA and Britain from the publication of Wiener's Cybernetics in 1948 to the decline of cybernetics among mainstream scientists in the 1960s. During that period, cyberneticians held multiple interpretations of their field. Most of the research on cybernetics focused on the analogy between humans and machines the main research method of cybernetics not the fusion of humans and machines, the domain of cyborgs. Although many cyberneticians in the USA and Britain viewed cybernetics as a `universal discipline', they created contested, area-specific interpretations of their field under the metadiscourse of cybernetics.

RESEARCHING CYBORGS

14

Cyborg was originally conceived as a term for describing how people might, through technology, adapt themselves for space travel. The cyborg was described by the inventors of the world in exceedingly unfriendly term as the exogenously extended organizational complex functioning as a integrated homeostatic system. The hybrid represented within the mechanic-organic body of the cyborg is a powerful metaphor through which science fiction authors explore humanitys relationship to technology. Early cyborg fictions dealt with questions concerning the breakdown of the notion of humanity, often attempting to determine the point at which a cyborg loses its humanity. Authors also deal with issues of human becoming enslaved by their own technologies. With the dawn of information age and the rise of the personal computer, the cyborg came to be viewed as a positive force, a hybrid that had not lost its humanity out, instead gained a host of new talents and powers.

POSITIVE ARGUMENTS

15

Certainly, there have been a number of positive responses to the cyborg phenomenon.They are discussed below.
1. There have been a number of AI researchers like Hans Moravec who have

unabashedly declared that it may be time for carbon-based biological life to yield control of the planet to its mind children, silicon-based life. If evolution is theorized from an abstract perspective as an attempt to increase the information processing power latent in matter, in the struggle against entropy, it is clear that hardware(artificial life) will eventually win out against wetware(organic life) since it is more durable and more efficient. These extropians see this as perhaps bad news for the human race ,but in the long term at least good news for the planet and apparently the universe.
2. There are other who foresee perhaps a more peaceable coexistence for

human beings and electronic life, however. One recent theory that has been bantered about lately is that the human race may have reached a the saturation point for economic growth, but this is fortunate since it has arrived in time for it to work on human growth, that is the reengineering of the human species. Indeed, there are those who feel without technological modification, the human beings might be simply too shortchanged from an evolutionary standpoint to accomplish the races greatest dreams, such as peaceful coexistence, evolutionary sustainability, and space exploration.
3. Some more realists feel that human biotechnology, will be an inevitable

necessity in light of coming changes. Human genetic structure may be irreversibly altered for the worse as levels of radiation, chemical pollution, and so on continue to increase. Global climate is likely to change drastically
16

due to global warming and ozone depletion.Pessimists who suspect many of these global changes may be irreversible sometimes have taken the position that the only way for the human race to avoid perishing as a species is to make some rapid technological changes in its biological adaptability.
4. Other scientists have argued that the sort of hyperintelligence made possible

by bioelectronics may be necessary to save the human race from itself. Today bioelectronics researchers suggest that augmented human beings may be able to cooperate with technology in unprecedented ways to reassert rational management of the planet and its resources, and stave off the irrational impulses of xenophobia and paranoia that might lead to its nuclear destruction.
5. Lastly, there are the postmodern theorists, normally noted for their

antitechnological stance, who have taken a favorable position on the coming of the cyborg. The cyborg anthropolpgists have followed the line of Donna Haraway, who declared that she would rather be a cyborg than a goddess any day, in a sort of cynical repudiation of ecofeminism and the fetishizing of nature. Haraway , a researcher interested in the links between humans, primates and computers, feel that the cyborg is an important metaphorical identity for human beings in the 21st century, in that it resists essentialism and helps to display the fluidness, hybridization and boundary-transgression of postmodern identities.

NEGATIVE CONSEQUENCES

17

The critics of bioelectronics and biocomputing foresee numerous potential negative social consequences from the technology. Some of them are discussed below.
1. Human race will divide along the lines of biological haves and hav-nots.

People with enough money will be able to augment their personal attributes as they see fit as well as to utilize cloning,organ replacement,etc to stave off death for as long as they wish, while the majority of human continue to suffer from plague, hunger, bad genes, and infirmity.
2. Its inevitable that there will be those who see the potential of a sort of

master race from this technology. It is not clear that these cyborgs would not turn on their creators. Indeed, there is no reason at all to think they would forever allow themselves to be controlled by inferiors. They could easily become a new sort of dominant caste, forcing the rest of untechnologized humanity into serfdom. Or perhaps they might decide simply to eliminate it.
3. One of the other dangers inherent in bioelectronics might be the ability

to control and monitor people. Certainly, it would be easy to utilize bioimplants that would allow people to trace the location and perhaps even monitor the condition and behavior of implanted persons. This would be a tremendous violation of human privacy, but the creators of human biotech might see it as necessary to keep their subjects under control. Once implanted with bio-implant electronic device, cyborgs might become highly dependent on the creators of these devices for their repair, recharge and maintenance. It could be possible to modify the
18

person technologically so that their body would stop producing some essential substance for survival, thus placing them under the absolute control of the designers of the technology.
4. Perhaps the most cogent arguments against this technology originate

from people who foresee tremendous possible risks towards human health and safety. While there is widespread talk of improving the human brain through the use of skill chips for implanting new knowledge, many people suspect that such interventions may be even more catastrophic because of the inability of the human nervous system to regenerate. Millions of years of evolution produced only so much capability within human organism, and it may be fatal to technologically stretch its performance beyond those built-in-limits. 5. Many people foresee drastic consequences on religion from

biotechnology, especially with regard to the idea of the intrinsic sanctity and integrity of human life and that human beings are created in the image of the divine. Even those not spiritually inclined who still nevertheless possess the feeling that there is something within humanity which is not found in animals or machines and which makes us uniquely human, worry that the essence of our humanity will be lost to this technology.

THE ARGUMENTS ON BALANCE

19

The proponents of bioelectronics are inevitably correct in suggesting that it holds out incredible benefits for the human race. Likewise, it is undeniably the case that some of the skepticism toward bioelectronics arises out of the superstitious attitude that people hold toward computers and electronic technology, as well as medical and reproductive procedures that they dont fully understand. However, they are incorrect in arguing that regulation and oversight will only hinder research in this area and prevent scientific progress in the relevant areas. In marginalizing the social and ethical issues generated by research in biocomputing, these researchers are showing a side of science that people have routinely expressed anger about-its refusal to accept social responsibility for unforeseen consequences. In order for bioelectronic research to progress, it will have to accept that the potential dangers are real, and that the concerns of some skeptics are valid. Otherwise, something disastrous might occur which night create a death-blow for the industry, much as happened with nuclear power in the US, and nothing positive will ever have been attained.

CONFIGURING THE CYBORG AS A TRANSLATOR

20

The cyborg, as fashioned by science fiction narratives, cinema and cartoons, Conjures images of human-machine hybrids and the physical merging of flesh and electronic circuitry. Different representations of the cyborg abound in science fiction narratives in print, film, animation and games, from reengineered human bodies to large robotic machines of power and strength to sleek and save microchip-implanted silicon-integrated human beings who work in their artificially mutated enhancements. The cyborg has covered a wide imaginative range from looking at a happy human-machine synthesis to a degenerate human body made by machinistic implants to a rise of a potent cyborg community that threatens to overcome the human world of biological certainty and mortality. Arjun Appadurai 1996), in his formulation of post-electronic modernity, explores how electronic media offer new everyday resources and disciplines for the imagination of the self and the world. He argues that the individual body and its ownership are wedded to the logic of capitalism and the notion of ownership that characterized most of the 20th century. Appadurai suggests that the body becomes a site of critical inquiry and contestation because a capitalist state grants the individual the rights to his/her body and the choice of fashion that body through consumption patterns. When talking of Technoscapes , Appadurai posits the idea of a technically enhanced sphere of activities and identity formation that defy the processes of capitalism and produce new instabilities in the creation of subjectivities.

The cyborg as a translator, because it produces its identities through the same techniques that produces the translated texts, internalizes the very techniques of translation. However, this process of internalization, instead of making the
21

techniques invisible, foregrounds them as essential to the comprehension and understanding of the meanings which have been produced in this dual process of translation. Within cyberspaces, social networking systems, blogs, discussion boards, media sharing platforms, etc, all create different conditions within which the physical users, through their digital avatars, interact with each other and form complex models of social networking and personal narratives. The social networking system and the related profiles also draw our attention to the dynamic interactions of the translated self within the digital domains. Through a metonymic process, the digital profile-the translated self-comes to stand in for the bodies of the users who not only create the translated self but also mark it with desires and aspirations. The translated self is largely under the control of the physical body. And yet, there are several ways in which the translated self does not allow for the physical body to emerge as the original, the authentic or the primary self within the dynamics of the site. The second step in this process is a reverse translation. Even within role playing games, where the alienation of the avatar from the body reaches its highest levels, there is an invested effort on the part of the gamer to provide physical and material contexts to the imagined bodies which they have created. With an increased investment in the digital lives, users tend to shape their own physical selves around their projected avatars. An increasing number of users start looking upon their screen lives as a constitutive part of their reality rather than an escape from it The cyborg exists in the intersitices of the different oppositions of the real and the virtual, the physical and the digital, the temporal and the spatial, the biological and
22

the technological. Moreover, the cyborg does not reside simply within the digital domains but becomes and embodied technosocial being, with a material body that enters into other realms of authorship and subjectification. It is necessary to recognize that the cyborg is not simply a self authored identity but also subject to various other realms of governance. These material cyborgs, then assert the need for the body as central to their imagination.

CYBORG DETECTOR

23

Technology was once something abjected from the individual; it was perceived as clearly outside of the body -- technology meant objects that individuals used. Not much thought was given to the networks of beliefs and practices by means of which the abstraction of technology gained substance and power in human life. By the turn of this century, however, our understanding of technology had begun to change. With the increasing and powerful assimilation and mobilization of technologies by capital, and the introduction of the concept of progress as a way of justifying the disruptions and depradations many technologies thus inflicted on human society, technology was promoted as a tool to extend and perfect the human being.. The cyborg detector is an installation that gives visitors an ironic experience of the interplay of technology and human identity. The boundaries between technology and flesh, individual and society, society and culture, are vague and mobile. Just as there is no clear definition about the boundaries of identity, there is also no universal definition of cyborgs. Cyborgs can be experimental prototypes of contemporary cultural identity. We intend to initiate dialogues in which people ask themselves how integrated technology and their sense-of-self in our information society is in their lives.We will "evaluate" a person's CQ by measuring their technological and cultural usage and attitude via a Tecological Components Evaluator, otherwise known as a metal detector and an interface questionnaire. This doesn't necessarily mean that someone with a high degree of metal content is a cyborg. Not all cyborgs possess metal parts. To qualify as a cyborg one must also identify with some of the cultural implications of cyberculture.

24

Visitors walk through the TCE system, which measures the metal content in and on their bodies. Then they proceed to a clinic office where a digitally generated "scientist" skilled in counseling cyborgs will interview them to determine their cultural attitude toward, and usage of, technology and cyberculture. However, the scientist seems to lack strength of character, because she/he changes shape in an attempt to track the cyborgness of the interviewee. Finally our Scientifically Accurate Cyborgian Knowledgebase calculates the visitor's CQ and the scientist tells them their cyborg degree. But technological calculation by a machine or a determination /categorization by humanoids or cyborgs cannot realistically determine the state of a being. The final question -- that the individual has to ask her/himself -- is: "Are you a cyborg?" - which is the most important question. The result gives the visitor an indication of their Cyborginess at the moment of evaluation. If appropriate, the scientist also gives them a cyborg ID badge. This ID is a microelectronic device with a specific resonance to sensors at the Ars Electronica Center (at the Global Village, there is an Ars Electronica Tent where it will work). If a cyborg passes one of the sensors, such as the one at the entrance of the Ars Electronica Tent, the sensor detects the cyborg and sets off the system's Visual and Acoustic Cyborg Welcome Signal. The monitor also signals: cyborg detected. Non-cyborgs who find themselves experiencing cyborg envy can apply for an upgrade at a special terminal. There they can redesign their identity by downloading information and integrating a piece of technological hardware into their lives. Afterwards, they can go back and redo the cyborg test, and they may

25

find that the virtual scientist has incorporated their hardware into his/her body as well.

CULTURAL IMAGERY OF CYBORGS

The term cyborg is a combination of the terms cybernetics and organism.It was originally coined by Manfred Clynes and Nathan Kline in their 1960 article

26

Cyborgs in space.According to the authors, a cyborg is that deliberately incorporates exogeneous components extending the self regulatory control function of the organism to adapt it to new environments.This definition arises from the authors desire to formulate the way of successfully adapting human beings to the rigors of outer space.They define cyborgs as a means of reshaping an organisms body to the new and different environs of outer space.This make man free to create,to explore,to think and to feel. The hybrid represented within the mechanic/organic body of the cyborg is a powerful metaphor through which science fiction authors explores humanitys relationship to technology.Early cyborg fictions delt with questions concerning the breakdownof the notion of humanity, often attempting to determine the point at which the cyborg looses its humanity.Authors also grappled with issues of human becomingenslaved by their own technologies.With the dawn of information age and the rise of personal computer, the cyborg came to be vieved as a positive fore, a hybrid that had not lost its humanity but,instead gained a host of new talents and powers.With this shift,the cyborg became an even more important figure for dealing with issues of technology with science fiction. Scanners Live In Vain by Cordwainer Smith Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep by Philip K Dick The Cyborg Manifesto by Donna Haraway Beyond the cartoonish heros or villains of some popular fiction, a number of intellectualswho have generally conceived cyborgs in their expansive sensehave seen liberating potentials in cyborgs. For some, such as Haldane (1923) or Weiner (1965),cyborgs simply represent an extension of the positive capabilities of

27

technologies; most practicing doctors and medical researchers probably share this attitude, albeit infrequently naming medically assisted humans as cyborgs. Another trend in social thought, however, puts a positive light on cyborgs because of their possibility of breaking down normative roles of gender, class, race, or other subaltern status (perhaps as much by compelling metaphor as by direct intervention). This tradition largely follows Michel Foucaults conception of biopower; Haraway (1991) is a prominent thinker in this tradition Recent fiction around cyborgs, particularly that labeled cyberpunk, both takes a morally ambivalent attitude towards what it conceives as more-or-less inevitable cyborg technologies, and also tends to focus on cognitive and communicative enhancements over physical ones.

HARWAY ON CYBORG ANTHROPOLOGY AND HUMANMACHINE RELATIONS

Harway explained that the cyborg is a cybernetic mechanism, a hybrid of machine and organism, a creature of social reality as well as a creature of fiction. Social reality is lived social relations, our most important political construction, a worldchanging fiction. The cyborg is a cybernetic organism, a fusion of the organic and the technical forged in particular, historical, cultural practices. Cyborgs are not about the machine and the human,as if such things and subjects universally existed.

28

Harway proposes what she terms a cyborg anthropology to study the relation between the machine and the human, and she adds that it should proceed by provocatively reconceiving the border relations among specific human, other organisms and machines. One result of the unexpected result of such a provocative approach is the recognition that attempts to establish binary oppositions between human and machine, people and technology, has disturbing parallels with racism.

The state of Cyborg

The cyborg, thus residing on the interstices of so many different paradigms, can no longer be limited to anesthetized representations and narratives, but is becoming a part of everyday practices of global urbanism. The range of human-machine relationships is diverse and increasingly varied. We might not be complete cyborgs but we do deal with intimate machines and live in cyborg societies. Different organizations like the Military, Space Studies, Medicine, Human Research and Education are using new forms of organism-technology interactions in the increasingly urbanized world.

POSTHUMAN IN POSTHUMANISM

29

In critical theory, the posthuman is a speculative being that represents or seeks to enact a re-writing of what is generally conceived of as human. It is the object of posthumanist criticism, which critically questions Renaissance humanism, a branch of humanist philosophy which claims that human nature is a universal state from which the human being emerges; human nature is autonomous, rational, capable of free will, and unified in itself as the apex of existence. Thus, the posthuman recognizes imperfectability and disunity within him or herself, instead understanding the world through context and heterogeneous perspectives while maintaining intellectual rigour and a dedication to objective observations of the world. Key to this posthuman practice is the ability to fluidly change perspectives and manifest oneself through different identities. The posthuman, for critical theorists of the subject, has an emergent ontology rather than a stable one; in other words, the posthuman is not a singular, defined individual, but rather one who can "become" or embody different identities and understand the world from multiple, heterogeneous perspectives. The posthuman, and posthumanism with it, are philosophical positions that overlap and are constantly engaged with much of postmodern philosophy, process philosophy, emerging technologies, and evolutionary biology, so the field is constantly changing. The critical notion of the posthuman is isolated from these fields as the embodiment of critical engagement itself; that is to say that the posthuman is not necessarily human in the first place, but is rather an embodied medium through which critical consciousness is manifested. Following Haraway, Hayles, whose work grounds much of the critical posthuman discourse, asserts that liberal humanism - which separates the mind from the body and thus portrays the body as a "shell" or vehicle for the mind- becomes increasingly complicated in the late 20th and 21st centuries because information
30

technology put the human body in question. Hayles maintains that we must be conscious of information technological advancements while understanding information as "disembodied," that is, something which cannot fundamentally replace the human body but can only be incorporated into it and human life practices. The posthuman is a being that relies on context rather than relativity, on situated objectivity rather than universal objectivity, and on the creation of meaning through 'play' between constructions of informational patternand reductions to the randomness of on-off switches, which are the foundation of digital binary systems.

Posthuman in transhumanism
According to transhumanist thinkers, a posthuman is a hypothetical future being "whose basic capacities so radically exceed those of present humans as to be no longer unambiguously human by our current standards." The difference between the posthuman and other hypothetical sophisticated nonhumans is that a posthuman was once a human, either in its lifetime or in the lifetimes of some or all of its direct ancestors. As such, a prerequisite for a posthuman is a transhuman, the point at which the human being begins surpassing his or her own limitations, but is still recognizable as a human person or similar. In this sense, the transition between human and posthuman may be viewed as a continuum rather than an all-or-nothing event.

Methods

31

Posthumans could be a symbiosis of human and artificial intelligence, or uploaded consciousnesses, or the result of making many smaller but cumulatively profound technological augmentations to a biological human, i.e. a cyborg. Some examples of the latter are redesigning the human organism using advanced nanotechnology or radical enhancement using some combination of technologies such as genetic engineering, psychopharmacology, life extension therapies, neural interfaces, advanced information management tools, memory enhancing drugs, wearable or implanted computers, and cognitive techniques

Posthuman future
As used in this article, "posthuman" does not necessarily refer to a conjectured future where humans are extinct or otherwise absent from the Earth. As with other species who speciate from one another, both humans and posthumans could continue to exist. However, the apocalyptic scenario appears to be a viewpoint shared among a minority of transhumanists such as Marvin Minsky and Hans Moravec, who could be considered misanthropes, at least in regards to humanity in its current state. Alternatively, others such as Kevin Warwick argue for the likelihood that both humans and posthumans will continue to exist but the latter will predominate in society over the former because of their abilities Many science fiction authors, such as Greg Egan, Bruce Sterling, Greg Bear, Charles Stross and Ken MacLeod, have written works set in posthuman futures.

32

WANT TO LIVE TO 200???

Cyborg, a compound word derived from cybernetics and organism, is a term coined by Manfred Clynes in 1960 to describe the need for mankind to artificially enhance biological functions in order to survive in the hostile environment of Space. Originally, a cyborg referred to a human being with bodily functions aided or controlled by technological devices, such as an oxygen tank, artificial heart valve or insulin pump. Over the years, the term has acquired a more general meaning, describing the dependence of human beings on technology. In this sense, cyborg can be used to characterize anyone who relies on a computer to complete their daily work.

33

Techno-optimists believe this will produce an era of universal and unprecedented peace and prosperity, where information flows freely and computers carry much of the burden of life. Pessimists think it will bring about the demise of the human race. The question is whether the enormous power of quantum computers will allow them to learn human levels of logic, reasonand innovation. Could they, for example, feel love, hate and compassion? In short, will a computers brain have what in humans we call a mind?

CONCLUSION
As many scientists have eloquently argued, once a technology is out there, you cannot make it go away. The genie will not go back in the bottle. There was a technology that the human race ever abandoned wholesale, even the hydrogen bomb or other weapons of mass destruction with the power to wipe out all life on earth. You might eventually be able to ban the production of H-bombs, but it would take a long time to kill everybody who knew how to make it. While scientists discussed the possibilitu of a ban on recombinant DNA research,they knew it was not feasible.

34

Thus, once invented, bioelectronic technologies cannot be wished away. Once given the opportunity to improve themselves in any form, human beings rarely surrender the opportunity, whether its pumping iron or exercise to raise physical fitness, so-called smart drugs to raise intelligence, or vitamin therapies to stem the onslaught of the aging process. When human beings are offered the chance to utilize computers and electronic technologies within their bodies to achieve the same results, it is almost certain they will embrace them regardless of the risk. Based on this, it would be unrealistic to try and ban such technologies, however one might worry about their ethical and social consequences. A ban would only probably force them into a large, criminal black market, as illegal drugs and weapons already have been. A new cyborg bioethics may be necessary. While it cannot be possible to foresee consequences resulting from bioelectronics, most scientists are already aware of what some of the major dangers are. Researchers in biocomputing may be required to adopt protocols on acceptable research with human subjects, much as genetic engineers did back in the 1970s. In drafting bioethical imperatives for bioelectronic research, it will probably be imperative to consider the concerns of groups such as religious community, science to ignore their concerns simply out of the insistence that they are merely acting out of anti-science ignorance will leave an important group out of the loop of this research. This is uncharted territory of the human race, and it is the first time in which our own built environment may be directly incorporated into our own sense of self and human nature. Our own biocomputers evolved under a specific set of evolutionary circumstances, after all, and they may not be equipped with the foresight and moral sense to keep with the accelerating pace of technology.

35

Since this is the case, it is probably imperative for society to assert that the scientists and engineers charged with creating this new technology exert the proper amount of social responsibility. Safeguards will have to be insisted on to prevent the possible negative impacts discussed, and many of these things have to be built in at the instrumental level, since the probably cannot be achieved only through policy and regulation. But ultimately, bioethicists will have to grapple with the fundamental issues involved, which touch on aspects of human existence and human nature which reach to the core of what most people think is involved in what it means to be human, and this will not be an easy dilemma to resolve.

REFERENCES

www.google.com

en..wikipedia.org sss.sagepub.com www.informaworld.com

www.kevinwarwick.com

www.carverhouse.net

36