UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE Chapter 11 Cordillera golf CLUB, LLC. Debtor filed voluntary for relief under chapter 11 of the United States bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. SSSS 101, et seq.
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE Chapter 11 Cordillera golf CLUB, LLC. Debtor filed voluntary for relief under chapter 11 of the United States bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. SSSS 101, et seq.
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE Chapter 11 Cordillera golf CLUB, LLC. Debtor filed voluntary for relief under chapter 11 of the United States bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. SSSS 101, et seq.
FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE Chapter 11 CORDILLERA GOLF CLUB, LLC/ Case No.12-11893 (CSS) Debtor. Re: Docket Nos. 6 and 42 Hearing Date: Jnly 27,2012@ 1:00 p.m. LIMITED OBJECTION OF THE OFFICIAL COMMITTEE OF UNSECURED CREDITORS TO DEBTOR'S MOTION FOR ORDER PURSUANT TO SECTIONS lOS( a), 363(b), 541, AND 507(a)(8) OF THE BANKRUPTCY CODE AUTHORIZING (I) PAYMENT OF CERTAIN PREPETITION TAXES AND FEES, AND (II) FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS TO PROCESS AND CASH RELATED CHECKS AND TRANSFERS The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors ("Committee") appointed in the above captioned, Chapter 11 bankruptcy case of Cordillera Golf Club, LLC ("Debtor"), by and through its (proposed) undersigned counsel, respectfully files this Limited Objection (this "Objection") to the Debtor's Motion for an Order Pursuant to Sections lOS( a), 363(b), 541, and 507(a)(8) of the Bankruptcy Code Authorizing (I) Payment of Certain Prepetition Taxes and Fees, and (II) Financial Institutions to Process and Cash Related Checks and Transfers [Docket No. 6] ("Motion"), and in support, would respectfully show this Court as follows: BACKGROUND 1. On June 26, 2012 ("Petition Date"), the Debtor filed its voluntary for relief under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. 101, et seq. (the "Bankruptcy Code"), thereby initiating the above-captioned case with this Court (the "Bankruptcy Case"). The Debtor remains in control of its business and affairs as a debtor-in-possession pursuant to sections 1107 and 1108 of the Bankruptcy Code. The Debtor in this chapter II case, and the last four digits of its employer tax identification number, is: XX-XXXI317. The corporate headquarters address for the Debtor is 97 Main Street, Suite E202, Edwards, co 81632. 615483.1 7/13/12 2. On July6, 2012, the United States Trustee filed its Notice of Appointment of Committee of Unsecured Creditors [Docket No. 86], thereby forming the Committee. 3. The Debtor is the owner and operator of "The Club at Cordillera" (the "Club"), located in Edwards Colorado in Eagle County. The Club includes three 18-hole golf courses, a short course, three tennis centers, fitness facilities, five indoor and outdoor pools, a summer camp and clubhouse for children, and riding, hiking and cross-country ski trails. See Declaration of Daniel L. Fitchett, Jr. in Support of Chapter 11 Petitions and First Day Relief ("Fitchett Declaration"), 'j7. 4. The Club is located within the Cordillera residential community in Edwards, Colorado, and derives revenues through fees and dues related to Club memberships and marketed to community residents and others. Fitchett Declaration, 'j'j5, 6, 8-12. 5. On the Petition Date, the Debtor filed with this Court its Motion, seeking this Court's authorization or order: (i) for the Debtor to pay "certain," "miscellaneous" taxes and license fees (collectively, the "Assessments") that have accrued pre-petition but remain unpaid (including payments that may have been "rejected, lost or not received in full"; (ii) for the Debtor to pay Assessments resulting from any audits of the Debtor conducted by governmental authorities with respect to same; (iii) for the Debtor to pay Assessments incurred from sales and services provided pre-petition, but coming due post-petition; and (iv) directing the Debtor's banks and financial institutions to honor and process payments for Assessments made pre- petition but which have not cleared as ofthe Petition Date. Motion, at '1'1 6, 7. 6. With respect to such requests, the Debtor further estimates and discloses that requested payments for Assessments will not exceed approximately $475,000, comprised in large part by a an alleged real estate tax in the amount of approximately $431,000. Motion, at 615483.1 7/13/12 2 I I- I 'If 8. Beyond this, the Motion does not disclose any authorities, licenses, permits and/or fees in question, or the amounts applicable to them. 7. The Debtor contends that its failure to pay the Assessments could have a material adverse impact on the Debtor's business and estate, and supports its request on the bases that: (i) authorities may institute audits if the Assessments are not paid, which would create unnecessary distractions and expenses for the Debtor; (ii) authorities may suspend the Debtor's operations, file liens, seek to lift the automatic stay, seek payment from the Debtor's officers and directors, and pursue other remedies that "will materially and immediately" harm the estate; and (iii) some of the Assessment funds constitute trust fund taxes that are held in trust for the benefit of authorities, and accordingly, are not property of the estate. Motion, at'\['\[ 8, 9. 8. In consideration of the foregoing, the Debtor contends that this Court should grant the Debtor the discretion to pay the Assessments, because: (i) "a portion" of the Assessments "may" be entitled to priority status; (ii) the foregoing trust fund issue would prevent the Debtor from otherwise using the trust funds in any event; (iii) under sections 105 and 363 of the Bankruptcy Code, this court can authorize the Debtor to use property of the estate outside of the ordinary course of business as may be appropriate or necessary, and the necessity of payment doctrine applies to the Assessments; and (iv) "some" states hold directors and officers personally liable for such Assessments in certain circumstances, and such a possibility would distract from their duties to the Debtor. Motion,'\['\[ 10-15. 9. On June 27, 2012, this Court entered its Interim Order granting the Motion in part [Docket No. 42] ("Interim Order"). The Interim Order permits the Debtor to pay Assessments in the amount of as much as $44,000 on an interim basis, and up to $475,000 if no party objects to 615483.1 7113/12 3 the Motion prior to July 13, 2012, and setting a final hearing to consider the Motion and any objection, for July 27,2012 at 1:00 p.m. LIMITED OBJECTIONS 10. The Committee generally consents to the relief requested in the Motion to the extent that the Assessment funds (including pursuant to any audit not stayed by operation of section 362 of the Bankruptcy Code) in the Debtor's possession are trust funds held for the benefit of taxing authorities. The Committee generally consents to the relief requested in the Motion to the extent that the Assessments would, if not paid, be entitled to priority. The Committee also generally consents to the extent that the necessity of payment doctrine truly applies with respect to any particular Assessment or authority, i.e., that the authority has an unstayed right to redress against the Debtor (such as the imposition of liens), to discontinue or refuse to issue any permits, licenses or authorizations to do business, that may reasonably be anticipated to have a material adverse effect on the Debtor or its estate. 11. However, the Committee objects that the Motion contains woefully inadequate details and disclosures for the Committee and other parties in interest to make these determinations. Without disclosure of the Authorities, and the nature of the Assessments, licenses and permits involved, it is simply impossible for the Committee to determine whether any of the stated justifications do, in fact, apply. 12. It appears that not all of the Assessments are trust funds. Some may be entitled to priority, but not all tax obligations, and not all penalties, are entitled to priority status under the Bankruptcy Code. See 11 U.S.C 507(a)(8); In reBates, 974 F.2d 1234 (10 1 h Cir. 1992). As to licensing, permitting and other non-tax Assessments, as well as the necessity of payment doctrine, the Debtor's justifications only apply where the Debtor can demonstrate not only that the license or permit (or goods or services) in question is necessary or critical to the estate, but 615483.1 7113/12 4 also that, unless payment of the pre-petition claim is made, the authority (or creditor I vendor) would be in a position to implement an immediate (unstayed) sanction against the Debtor, such as legally refusing, terminating, or revoking the license, permit or other goods or service in question. In re Lehigh & New England Railway Co., 657 F.2d 570, 581 (3d Cir. 1981) (stating that court may authorize payment of pre-petition claims when there "is the possibility that the creditor will employ an immediate economic sanction, failing such payment"); In re Penn Central Transp. Co., 467 F.2d 100, 102 n.l (3d Cir. 1972) (holding that the necessity of payment doctrine permits "immediate payment of claims of creditors where those creditors will not supply services or material essential to the conduct of the business until their pre-reorganization claims have been paid"). 13. It may be that the Debtor's justifications apply in each instance, but it similarly may not be the case as to any particular Assessment or authority. Without any disclosure of the authorities and the nature of the Assessments in question, the Committee cannot determine which is the case. 14. This concern is amplified where the Debtor's justification is simply that if it does not pay the Assessments, then its officers or directors may be held to be personally liable. While it is true that, in some extraordinary circumstances, the automatic stay can be extended to protect non-debtor officers and directors where a determination of liability would effectively constitute a determination against the Debtor, the Committee is aware of no doctrine or authority that provides that a bankruptcy estate may pay pre-petition claims outside of a chapter 11 plan simply because the debtor's officers or directors might otherwise be held responsible. Moreover, whether such individual liability to any given Assessment would reasonably arise, and if so, whether such liability would rise to the level of an untenable distraction must depend on the 615483.1 7/13/12 5 specific circumstances. These matters cannot be established through mere generalized, conclusory allegations. 15. Accordingly, the Motion should be denied, at least pending further disclosure and supplementation by the Debtor of the matters raised herein. Dated: July 13, 2012 615483.1 7113/12 SAUL EWING LLP
222 Delaware Avenue, Suite 1200 P.O. Box 1266 Wilmington, DE 19899 Telephone: (302) 421-6840 Facsimile: (302) 421-5873 E-mail: mminuti@saul.com -and- MUNSCH HARDT KOPF & HARR, P.C. Russell L. Munsch Texas Bar No. 14671500 Joseph J. Wielebinski Texas Bar No. 21432400 Jay H. Ong Texas Bar No. 24028756 3800 Lincoln Plaza 500 N. Akard Street Dallas, TX 75201-6659 Telephone: (214) 855-7500 Facsimile: (214) 978-4335 E-mail: rmunsch@munsch.com E-mail: jwielebinski@munsch.com E-mail: jong@munsch.com Proposed Counsel for the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors 6 I I I I In re: UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE Chapter 11 CORDILLERA GOLF CLUB, LLC, Case No. 12-11893 (CSS) Debtor. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Mark Minuti, hereby certify that on July 13, 2012, a copy of the foregoing Limited Objection of the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors to Debtor's Motion for Order Pursuant to Sections 105(a), 363(b), 541, and 507(a)(8) of the Bankruptcy Code Authorizing (I) Payment of Certain Prepetition Taxes and Fees, and (II) Financial Institutions to Process and Cash Related Checks and Transfers was served on the parties on the attached service list in the manner indicated therein. Dated: July 13, 2012 615483.1 7/13/12 SAUL EWING LLP B y : ~ ----....., Mark Minuti (No. 2659) 222 Delaware Avenue, Suite 1200 P. 0. Box 1266 Wilmington, DE 19899 (302) 421-6840 CORDILLERA GOLF CLUB, LLC Service List Via Hand Delivery: Michael R. Nestor, Esquire Joseph M. Barry, Esquire Donald J. Bowman, Esquire Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor LLP Rodney Square 1000 North King Street Wilmington, DE 19801 Mark Kenney, Esquire Office of the United States Trustee J. Caleb Boggs Federal Building 844 King Street, Suite 2207 Wilmington, DE 19801 Mark D. Collins, Esquire Zachary I. Shapiro, Esquire Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A. One Rodney Square 920 N. King Street Wilmington, DE 19801 Tobey M. Daluz, Esquire Joshua E. Zugarman, Esquire Ballard Spahr LLP 919 N. Market Street, 11th Floor Wilmington, DE 19801 Damien Tancredi, Esquire Cozen O'Connor, PC 1201 N. Market Street, Suite 1400 Wilmington, DE 19801 William P. Bowden, Esquire Ricardo Palacio, Esquire Ashby & Geddes, P .A. 500 Delaware avenue, 8th Floor P.O. Box 1150 Wilmington, DE 19899 615483.1 7113/12 Matthew P. Ward, Esquire Ericka F. Johnson, Esquire Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice, LLP 222 Delaware Avenue, Suite 1501 Wilmington, DE 19801 Richard W. Riley, Esquire Duane Morris LLP 222 Delaware A venue, Suite 1600 Wilmington, DE 19801-1659 Ellen W. Slights, Esquire United States Attorney's Office District of Delaware 1007 N. Orange Street, Suite 700 P.O. Box 2046 Wilmington, DE 19899-2046 Via Electronic Mail and First Class Mail: Erika L. Morabito, Esquire Brittney J. Nelson, Esquire Foley Lardner LLP 3000 K Street, N.W., Suite 600 Washington, DC 20007 Christopher Celentino, Esquire Mikel Bistrow, Esquire Dawn Messick, Esquire Foley Lardner LLP 402 W. Broadway, Suite 2100 San Diego, CA 92101 Carl A. Eklund, Esquire Ballard Spahr, LLP 1225 17th Street, Suite 2300 Denver, CO 80202 I I Vincent J. Marriott, III, Esquire Sara Schindler-Williams, Esquire Ballard Spahr, LLP 1735 Market Street, 51st Floor Philadelphia, PA 19103 David L. Lenyo, Esquire Garfield & Hecht, P.C. 601 East Hyman A venue Aspen, CO 81611 James J. Holman, Esquire Duane Morris LLP 30 South 17th Street Philadelphia, P A 19103 Arthur J. Abramowitz, Esquire Cozen O'Connor, PC Libertyview, Suite 300 457 Haddonfield Road Cherry Hill, NJ 08002 Brad W. Breslau, Esquire Cozen O'Connor, PC 707 17th Street, Suite 31 00 Denver, CO 80202 Melissa Maxman, Esquire Ronald Wick, Esquire Cozen O'Connor, PC 1627 I Street, NW, Suite 1100 Washington, DC 20006 Harlan W. Robins, Esquire Dickinson Wright PLLC 15 N. 4th Street Columbus, OH 43215 Kristi A. Katsma, Esquire Dickinson Wright PLLC 500 Woodward Avenue, Suite 4000 Detroit, MI 48226 615483.1 7/13/12 2 Garry R. Appel, Esquire Appel & Lucas, P.C. 1660 17th Street, Suite 200 Denver, CO 80202 Peter A. Cal, Esquire Mark L. Fulford, Esquire Sherman & Howard L.L.C. 633 17th Street, Suite 3000 Denver, CO 80202 MichaelS. Kogan, Esquire Kogan Law Firm, PC 1901 Avenue ofthe Stars, Suite 1050 Los Angeles, CA 90067 I
American Druggists Ins. Co., Inc., and John H. Brown v. Joseph I. Bogart, Clerk of The Court, Southern District of Florida, 707 F.2d 1229, 11th Cir. (1983)
Bankr. L. Rep. P 69,989 in Re Eugene C. Mullendore and Kathleen Boren Mullendore, Debtors. Kathleen Boren Mullendore and Katsy Mullendore Mecom v. United States, 741 F.2d 306, 10th Cir. (1984)
In Re Federal Mogul-Global Inc. T & N Limited Committee of Equity Security Holders of Federal-Mogul Corporation v. Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors, 348 F.3d 390, 3rd Cir. (2003)