United States Bankruptcy Court District of Nevada

Case 09-14814-lbr 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
LARSON & STEPHENS 810 S. Casino Center Blvd., Suite 104 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 Tel: (702) 382-1170 Fax: (702) 382-1169
Doc 836
Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16
Page 1 of 10
James I. Stang, Esq. (CA Bar No. 94435) Shirley S. Cho, Esq. (CA Bar No. 192616) Werner Disse, Esq. (CA Bar No. 143458) PACHULSKI STANG ZIEHL & JONES LLP 10100 Santa Monica Blvd., 11th Floor Los Angeles, California 90067-4100 Telephone: 310/277-6910 Facsimile: 310/201-0760 Email: jstang@pszjlaw.com scho@pszjlaw.com wdisse@pszjlaw.com Zachariah Larson, Esq. (NV Bar No. 7787) LARSON & STEPHENS 810 S. Casino Center Blvd., Ste. 104 Las Vegas, NV 89101 Telephone: 702/382.1170 Facsimile: 702/382.1169 Email: zlarson@lslawnv.com Attorneys for Debtors and Debtors in Possession
E-File: December 14, 2009
11 12 13 14
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 15 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

The Debtors in these cases, along with their case numbers are: Heritage Land Company, LLC (Case No. 0914778); The Rhodes Companies, LLC (Case No. 09-14814); Tribes Holdings, LLC (Case No. 09-14817); Apache Framing, LLC (Case No. 09-14818); Geronimo Plumbing LLC (Case No. 09-14820); Gung-Ho Concrete LLC (Case No. 09-14822); Bravo, Inc. (Case No. 09-14825); Elkhorn Partners, A Nevada Limited Partnership (Case No. 0914828); Six Feathers Holdings, LLC (Case No. 09-14833); Elkhorn Investments, Inc. (Case No. 09-14837); Jarupa, LLC (Case No. 09-14839); Rhodes Realty, Inc. (Case No. 09-14841); C & J Holdings, Inc. (Case No. 09-14843);
73203-001\DOCS_SF:69112.1
1
In re: THE RHODES COMPANIES, LLC, aka Rhodes Homes, et al.,1 Debtors. ____________________________________ Affects: All Debtors Affects the following Debtor(s): The Rhodes Companies, LLC 09-14814; Rhodes Design and Development Corporation 09-14846; and Rhodes Ranch Golf and Country Club 09-14854
Case No.: BK-S-09-14814-LBR (Jointly Administered) Chapter 11 Hearing Date: January 14, 2010 Hearing Time: 9:00 a.m. Courtroom 1
Case 09-14814-lbr
Doc 836
Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16
Page 2 of 10
1 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 10 11 11 12 12 13 13 14 14 15 15 16 16 17 17 18 18 19 19 20 20 21 21 22 22 23 23 24 24 25 25 26 26 27 27 28 28
DEBTORS OMNIBUS OBJECTION TO LAS VEGAS VALLEY WATER DISTRICTS CLAIMS PURSUANT TO SECTION 502(b) OF THE BANKRUPTCY CODE AND BANKRUPTCY RULES 3003 AND 3007; DECLARATION OF PAUL D. HUYGENS IN SUPPORT THEREOF The above-captioned debtors and debtors in possession (collectively, the Debtors) hereby object (the Omnibus Objection) to each of the claims (the LVVWD Claims), identified herein on Exhibit A, pursuant to section 502(b) of title 11 of the United States Code (the Bankruptcy Code) and Rules 3003 and 3007 of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure (the Bankruptcy Rules), and request the entry of an order (the Order) disallowing or reducing each of the LVVWD Claims as indicated in further detail below.2 The proofs of claim for the LVVWD Claims are attached hereto as Exhibit B. In support of this Omnibus Objection, the Debtors rely on the Declaration of Paul D. Huygens in Support of Debtors Omnibus Objection to Las Vegas Valley Water Districts Claims, attached hereto. In further support of this Omnibus Objection, the Debtors respectfully represent as follows: BACKGROUND 1. On March 31, 2009, the above-captioned Debtors (the Primary Filers), except
Tuscany Golf Country Club, LLC, Pinnacle Grading, LLC, and Rhodes Homes Arizona, LLC (the Secondary Filers), filed voluntary petitions for relief under chapter 11 of title 11 of the Bankruptcy Code. On April 1, 2009, the Secondary Filers filed voluntary petitions for relief under chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code. All references to Petition Date herein shall mean March 31, 2009 for the Primary Filers or April 1, 2009 for the Secondary Filers, as applicable. The Debtors are continuing in possession of their property and are operating and managing their
Rhodes Ranch General Partnership (Case No. 09-14844); Rhodes Design and Development Corporation (Case No. 09-14846); Parcel 20, LLC (Case No. 09-14848); Tuscany Acquisitions IV, LLC (Case No. 09-14849); Tuscany Acquisitions III, LLC (Case No. 09-14850); Tuscany Acquisitions II, LLC (Case No. 09-14852); Tuscany Acquisitions, LLC (Case No. 09-14853); Rhodes Ranch Golf and Country Club, LLC (Case No. 09-14854); Overflow, LP (Case No. 09-14856); Wallboard, LP (Case No. 09-14858); Jackknife, LP (Case No. 09-14860); Batcave, LP (Case No. 09-14861); Chalkline, LP (Case No. 09-14862); Glynda, LP (Case No. 09-14865); Tick, LP (Case No. 09-14866); Rhodes Arizona Properties, LLC (Case No. 09-14868); Rhodes Homes Arizona, L.L.C. (Case No. 09-14882); Tuscany Golf Country Club, LLC (Case No. 09-14884); and Pinnacle Grading, LLC (Case No. 0914887). The Debtors reserve the right to file additional omnibus objections, whether on substantive or non-substantive grounds, to any and all other claims filed against their estates.
2
73203-001\DOCS_SF:69112.1
Case 09-14814-lbr
Doc 836
Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16
Page 3 of 10
1 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 10 11 11 12 12 13 13 14 14 15 15 16 16 17 17 18 18 19 19 20 20 21 21 22 22 23 23 24 24 25 25 26 26 27 27 28 28
businesses, as debtors in possession, pursuant to sections 1107 and 1108 of the Bankruptcy Code. 2. The Debtors object to each of the LVVWD Claims as set forth in detail on
Exhibit A hereto. The proofs of claim are attached hereto as Exhibit B. RELIEF REQUESTED 3. By this Omnibus Objection, the Debtors seek entry of an order, pursuant to
section 502(b) of the Bankruptcy Code and Bankruptcy Rules 3003 and 3007, disallowing in full or reducing the LVVWD Claims as set forth in Exhibit A. OBJECTION 4. The Debtors object to the LVVWD Claims listed on Exhibit A because the
LVVWD Claims are not supported by the Debtors books and records. LVVWD filed the following three separate claims in three different Debtor cases: 5. Rhodes Ranch Golf and Country Club (Case No. 09-14854-LBR), in the amount of $50,418.62, designated as Claim No. 24; Rhodes Design and Development Corporation (Case No. 09-14846-LBR), in the amount of $11,029.62, designated as Claim No. 138; and The Rhodes Companies, LLC (Case No. 09-14814-LBR), in the amount of $74,340.65, designated as Claim No. 72. On or about October 21 2009, the Debtors sent LVVWD a letter requesting it
withdraw two of its claims, and reduce the third. See Exhibit C. The Debtors requested that LVVWD withdraw claim number 24 based on the fact that the invoice attached to claim 24 (acct no. 7350542962-2) is a duplicate of an invoice already attached to Claim No. 72. In addition, the Debtors further requested that LVVWD withdraw claim number 138 because the invoice attached to claim 138 (acct no. 8714542962-4) is a duplicate of an invoice already attached to Claim No. 72. Lastly, with respect to claim number 72, the Debtors requested that LVVWD reduce their claim to the amount of $72.49, based on the Debtors books and records because portions of the claim have already been paid and other portions of the claim relate to nonDebtors. The Debtors set all this forth on an account number basis in the letter sent to LVVWD. See Exhibit C for details.
73203-001\DOCS_SF:69112.1
Case 09-14814-lbr
Doc 836
Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16
Page 4 of 10
1 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 10 11 11 12 12 13 13 14 14 15 15 16 16 17 17 18 18 19 19 20 20 21 21 22 22 23 23 24 24 25 25 26 26 27 27 28 28
6.
On or about November 4, 2009, counsel to LVVWD responded to Debtors letter
by telephone requesting an extension of time to respond to the Debtors letter, up to and including December 4, 2009. On December 8, 2009, Debtors counsel left a follow-up voicemail for LVVWDs counsel. As of the date of this filing, the Debtors have not received any additional response from LVVWD or their counsel. 7. Bankruptcy Code section 502 authorizes a party in interest to object to claims.
See 11 U.S.C. 502(a). Although a proper proof of claim is presumed valid under Bankruptcy Rule 3001(f), once an objection controverts the presumption, the creditor has the ultimate burden of persuasion as to the validity and amount of the claim. Ashford v. Consolidated Pioneer Mortg. (In re Consolidated Pioneer Mortg.), 178 B.R. 222, 226 (B.A.P. 9th Cir. 1995), affd, 91 F.3d 151 (9th Cir. 1996) (quoting In re Allegheny International, Inc., 954 F.2d 167, 173-74 (3d Cir. 1992)). The Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit explained the shifting burdens of proof with respect to objection to proofs of claim as follows: The burden of proof for claims brought in the bankruptcy court under 11 U.S.C.A. 502(a) rests on different parties at different times. Initially, the claimant must allege facts sufficient to support the claim. If the averments in his filed claim meet this standard of sufficiency, it is prima facie valid. In other words, a claim that alleges facts sufficient to support a legal liability to the claimant satisfies the claimants initial obligation to go forward. . . . The burden of persuasion is always on the claimant. Id. (emphasis added). Following this decision, the District Court for the Northern District of California emphasized, unless the claimant has alleged facts sufficient to support a legal liability, the claim is not prima facie valid. In re Hongnisto, 293 B.R. 45, 50 (N.D. Cal. 2003) (quoting Consolidated Pioneer Mortg., 178 B.R. at 266) (holding that the claimants proof of claim failed to allege sufficient facts to support a legal liability and consequently disallowed the proof of claim); see Consolidated Pioneer Mortg., 178 B.R. at 227 (holding that because the
73203-001\DOCS_SF:69112.1
Case 09-14814-lbr
Doc 836
Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16
Page 5 of 10
1 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 10 11 11 12 12 13 13 14 14 15 15 16 16 17 17 18 18 19 19 20 20 21 21 22 22 23 23 24 24 25 25 26 26 27 27 28 28
proof of claim did not allege sufficient facts to support the claim, the proof of claim was disallowed). 8. Based on the Debtors review of their books and records and the disputed
LVVWD Claims, the claimants have no valid legal justification for asserting the LVVWD Claims against the given Debtor as filed. As a result, the Debtors submit that the LVVWD Claims should be disallowed in their entirety or reduced as set forth in the Column marked Proposed Treatment/Disposition in Exhibit A by the Court CONCLUSION 9. The Debtors object to the allowance of the LVVWD Claims for the reasons stated
herein, and the Debtors hereby move this Court for an Order disallowing or reducing each of the LVVWD Claims as set forth in the column marked Proposed Treatment/Disposition in Exhibit A. NOTICE 10. Notice of this objection has been provided to (i) the Office of the United States
Trustee, (ii) counsel to the Creditors Committee, (iii) the claimant to which the Debtors are objecting to the claim in this Omnibus Objection in accordance with the addresses provided in the proof of claim for each LVVWD Claim, (iv) each person or entity that has filed a notice of appearance and request for special notice, and (v) other required parties pursuant to the Courts case management order entered in these cases. The Debtors submit that in light of the nature of the relief requested herein, no other or further notice is required. 11. Pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 3007, the Debtors have provided all claimants
affected by the Omnibus Objection with at least thirty (30) days notice of the hearing on the Omnibus Objection. /// /// /// /// ///
73203-001\DOCS_SF:69112.1
Case 09-14814-lbr
Doc 836
Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16
Page 6 of 10
1 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 10 11 11 12 12 13 13 14 14 15 15 16 16 17 17 18 18 19 19 20 20 21 21 22 22 23 23 24 24 25 25 26 26 27 27 28 28
WHEREFORE, the Debtors respectfully request that the Court enter an Order, substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit D, disallowing or reducing each of the LVVWD Claims as set forth in the Column marked Proposed Treatment/Disposition in Exhibit A and granting such other and further relief as the Court deems just an proper under the circumstances of these chapter 11 cases. DATED this 14th day of December, 2009. LARSON & STEPHENS /s/ Zachariah Larson, Esq. Zachariah Larson, Bar No. 7787 Kyle O. Stephens, Bar No. 7928 810 S. Casino Center Blvd., Suite 104 Las Vegas, NV 89101 702/382-1170 Attorneys for Debtors and Debtors in Possession
73203-001\DOCS_SF:69112.1
Case 09-14814-lbr
Doc 836
Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16
Page 7 of 10
1 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 10 11 11 12 12 13 13 14 14 15 15 16 16 17 17 18 18 19 19 20 20 21 21 22 22 23 23 24 24 25 25 26 26 27 27 28 28
DECLARATION OF PAUL D. HUYGENS IN SUPPORT OF DEBTORS OMNIBUS OBJECTION TO LAS VEGAS VALLEY WATER DISTRICTS CLAIMS I, Paul D. Huygens, declare as follows: 1. I am the Senior Vice President of Special Projects of the above-captioned
debtors and debtors in possession (the Debtors). The facts set forth in this Declaration are personally known to me and, if called as a witness, I could and would testify thereto. 2. This declaration is submitted in support of the Debtors Omnibus
Objection to Las Vegas Valley Water Districts Claims Pursuant to Section 502(b) of the Bankruptcy Code and Bankruptcy Rules 3003 and 3007 (the Omnibus Objection). 3. I am one of the persons responsible for overseeing the claims
reconciliation and objection process in the Debtors chapter 11 cases. I have read the Debtors Omnibus Objection and am directly, or by and through my personnel or agents, familiar with the information contained therein and the facts stated therein are correct and accurate. 4. The claims and attached information and documentation were carefully
reviewed and analyzed in good faith, and the Debtors books and records were referenced for additonal support, utilizing due diligence by appropriate personnel of the Debtors. These efforts have resulted in the identification of the disputed LVVWD Claims, as identified in Exhibit A to the Omnibus Objection. The proofs of claim for the LVVWD Claims are attached as Exhibit B to the Omnibus Objection. I have personally reviewed each of the LVVWD Claims. 5. Based on a thorough review of their books and records, the Debtors
submit that the Debtors books and records show that, in some cases, no amount is owing, or in other cases, the amount alleged exceeds the amount owed. Therefore, the LVVWD Claims listed on Exhibit A should be disallowed in their entirety or reduced as set forth in the Column marked Proposed Treatment/Disposition in Exhibit A. /// /// /// ///
73203-001\DOCS_SF:69112.1
Case 09-14814-lbr
Doc 836
Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16
Page 8 of 10
1 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 10 11 11 12 12 13 13 14 14 15 15 16 16 17 17 18 18 19 19 20 20 21 21 22 22 23 23 24 24 25 25 26 26 27 27 28 28
6.
I believe that granting the relief requested in the Omnibus Objection is in
the best interests of the Debtors, their estates and their creditors. I declare under penalty of perjury pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1746 that the foregoing is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief. Executed this 14th day of December, 2009, at Las Vegas, Nevada.
/s/ Paul D. Huygens Paul D. Huygens
73203-001\DOCS_SF:69112.1
Case 09-14814-lbr 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Doc 836
Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16
Page 9 of 10
EXHIBIT A
11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
73203-001\DOCS_SF:69112.1
Case 09-14814-lbr
Doc 836
Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16
Page 10 of 10
EXHIBIT A
To Omnibus Objection to Las Vegas Valley Water Districts Claims Claim No. Filed in Debtor Case Total Claimed Amount Total Modified Amount Proposed Treatment/ Disposition Claimant Name LAS VEGAS VALLEY WATER DISTRICT C/O SHERILYN A. OLSEN, ESQ. HOLLAND & HART LLP 60 E. SOUTH TEMPLE SUITE 2000 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84111 LAS VEGAS VALLEY WATER DISTRICT C/O SHERILYN A. OLSEN, ESQ. HOLLAND & HART LLP 60 E. SOUTH TEMPLE SUITE 2000 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84111 LAS VEGAS VALLEY WATER DISTRICT C/O SHERILYN A. OLSEN, ESQ. HOLLAND & HART LLP 60 E. SOUTH TEMPLE SUITE 2000 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84111
138
09-14846
11,029.62
0.00
Disallow claim in its entirety
24
09-14854
50,418.62
0.00
Disallow claim in its entirety
72
09-14818
74,340.65
Reduce and allow as a general 72.49 unsecured claim in the modified amount
73203-002\DOCS_SF:69113.1
Case 09-14814-lbr
Doc 836-1
Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16
Page 1 of 20
CLAIM 138
Case Case 09-14846-lbr 836-1 138-1 Filed 09/29/09 PagePage25 of 20 09-14814-lbr Doc Claim Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16 1 of 2
Case 09-14814-lbr Doc 836-1 138-1 Filed 09/29/09 Page 9 of 25 of 20 Case 09-14846-lbr Claim Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16 Page 10
CaseCase 09-14846-lbr 836-1 138-1 Filed 09/29/09 PagePage 11 of 20 09-14814-lbr Doc Claim Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16 10 of 25
Case 09-14814-lbr Doc 836-2 138-1 Filed 09/29/09 Page 20 of 25of 26 Case 09-14846-lbr Claim Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16 Page 1
Case 09-14814-lbr Doc 836-2 Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16 Page 1 of of 26 Case 09-14846-lbr Claim 138-1 Part 2 Filed 09/29/09 Page 7 20
Case 09-14814-lbr Doc 836-2 Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16 Page 4 10 20 26 Case 09-14846-lbr Claim 138-1 Part 2 Filed 09/29/09 Page of of
Case 09-14814-lbr
Doc 836-3
Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16
Page 1 of 7
CLAIM 24
Case 09-14854-lbr Claim Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16 Page Case 09-14814-lbr Doc 836-3 24-1 Filed 09/29/09 Page 1 of 6 2 of 7
Case 09-14814-lbr
Doc 836-4
Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16
Page 1 of 50
Case 09-14814-lbr
Doc 836-4
Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16
Page 2 of 50
Case 09-14814-lbr
Doc 836-4
Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16
Page 3 of 50
Case 09-14814-lbr
Doc 836-4
Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16
Page 4 of 50
Case 09-14814-lbr
Doc 836-4
Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16
Page 5 of 50
Case 09-14814-lbr
Doc 836-4
Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16
Page 6 of 50
Case 09-14814-lbr
Doc 836-4
Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16
Page 7 of 50
Case 09-14814-lbr
Doc 836-4
Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16
Page 8 of 50
Case 09-14814-lbr
Doc 836-4
Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16
Page 9 of 50
Case 09-14814-lbr
Doc 836-4
Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16
Page 10 of 50
Case 09-14814-lbr
Doc 836-4
Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16
Page 11 of 50
Case 09-14814-lbr
Doc 836-4
Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16
Page 12 of 50
Case 09-14814-lbr
Doc 836-4
Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16
Page 13 of 50
Case 09-14814-lbr
Doc 836-4
Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16
Page 14 of 50
Case 09-14814-lbr
Doc 836-4
Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16
Page 15 of 50
Case 09-14814-lbr
Doc 836-4
Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16
Page 16 of 50
Case 09-14814-lbr
Doc 836-4
Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16
Page 17 of 50
Case 09-14814-lbr
Doc 836-4
Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16
Page 18 of 50
Case 09-14814-lbr
Doc 836-4
Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16
Page 19 of 50
Case 09-14814-lbr
Doc 836-4
Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16
Page 20 of 50
Case 09-14814-lbr
Doc 836-4
Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16
Page 21 of 50
Case 09-14814-lbr
Doc 836-4
Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16
Page 22 of 50
Case 09-14814-lbr
Doc 836-4
Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16
Page 23 of 50
Case 09-14814-lbr
Doc 836-4
Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16
Page 24 of 50
Case 09-14814-lbr
Doc 836-4
Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16
Page 25 of 50
Case 09-14814-lbr
Doc 836-4
Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16
Page 26 of 50
Case 09-14814-lbr
Doc 836-4
Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16
Page 27 of 50
Case 09-14814-lbr
Doc 836-4
Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16
Page 28 of 50
Case 09-14814-lbr
Doc 836-4
Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16
Page 29 of 50
Case 09-14814-lbr
Doc 836-4
Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16
Page 30 of 50
Case 09-14814-lbr
Doc 836-4
Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16
Page 31 of 50
Case 09-14814-lbr
Doc 836-4
Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16
Page 32 of 50
Case 09-14814-lbr
Doc 836-4
Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16
Page 33 of 50
Case 09-14814-lbr
Doc 836-4
Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16
Page 34 of 50
Case 09-14814-lbr
Doc 836-4
Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16
Page 35 of 50
Case 09-14814-lbr
Doc 836-4
Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16
Page 36 of 50
Case 09-14814-lbr
Doc 836-4
Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16
Page 37 of 50
Case 09-14814-lbr
Doc 836-4
Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16
Page 38 of 50
Case 09-14814-lbr
Doc 836-4
Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16
Page 39 of 50
Case 09-14814-lbr
Doc 836-4
Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16
Page 40 of 50
Case 09-14814-lbr
Doc 836-4
Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16
Page 41 of 50
Case 09-14814-lbr
Doc 836-4
Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16
Page 42 of 50
Case 09-14814-lbr
Doc 836-4
Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16
Page 43 of 50
Case 09-14814-lbr
Doc 836-4
Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16
Page 44 of 50
Case 09-14814-lbr
Doc 836-4
Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16
Page 45 of 50
Case 09-14814-lbr
Doc 836-4
Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16
Page 46 of 50
Case 09-14814-lbr
Doc 836-4
Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16
Page 47 of 50
Case 09-14814-lbr
Doc 836-4
Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16
Page 48 of 50
Case 09-14814-lbr
Doc 836-4
Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16
Page 49 of 50
Case 09-14814-lbr
Doc 836-4
Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16
Page 50 of 50
Case 09-14814-lbr
Doc 836-5
Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16
Page 1 of 55
Case 09-14814-lbr
Doc 836-5
Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16
Page 2 of 55
Case 09-14814-lbr
Doc 836-5
Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16
Page 3 of 55
Case 09-14814-lbr
Doc 836-5
Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16
Page 4 of 55
Case 09-14814-lbr
Doc 836-5
Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16
Page 5 of 55
Case 09-14814-lbr
Doc 836-5
Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16
Page 6 of 55
Case 09-14814-lbr
Doc 836-5
Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16
Page 7 of 55
Case 09-14814-lbr
Doc 836-5
Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16
Page 8 of 55
Case 09-14814-lbr
Doc 836-5
Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16
Page 9 of 55
Case 09-14814-lbr
Doc 836-5
Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16
Page 10 of 55
Case 09-14814-lbr
Doc 836-5
Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16
Page 11 of 55
Case 09-14814-lbr
Doc 836-5
Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16
Page 12 of 55
Case 09-14814-lbr
Doc 836-5
Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16
Page 13 of 55
Case 09-14814-lbr
Doc 836-5
Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16
Page 14 of 55
Case 09-14814-lbr
Doc 836-5
Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16
Page 15 of 55
Case 09-14814-lbr
Doc 836-5
Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16
Page 16 of 55
Case 09-14814-lbr
Doc 836-5
Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16
Page 17 of 55
Case 09-14814-lbr
Doc 836-5
Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16
Page 18 of 55
Case 09-14814-lbr
Doc 836-5
Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16
Page 19 of 55
Case 09-14814-lbr
Doc 836-5
Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16
Page 20 of 55
Case 09-14814-lbr
Doc 836-5
Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16
Page 21 of 55
Case 09-14814-lbr
Doc 836-5
Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16
Page 22 of 55
Case 09-14814-lbr
Doc 836-5
Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16
Page 23 of 55
Case 09-14814-lbr
Doc 836-5
Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16
Page 24 of 55
Case 09-14814-lbr
Doc 836-5
Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16
Page 25 of 55
Case 09-14814-lbr
Doc 836-5
Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16
Page 26 of 55
Case 09-14814-lbr
Doc 836-5
Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16
Page 27 of 55
Case 09-14814-lbr
Doc 836-5
Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16
Page 28 of 55
Case 09-14814-lbr
Doc 836-5
Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16
Page 29 of 55
Case 09-14814-lbr
Doc 836-5
Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16
Page 30 of 55
Case 09-14814-lbr
Doc 836-5
Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16
Page 31 of 55
Case 09-14814-lbr
Doc 836-5
Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16
Page 32 of 55
Case 09-14814-lbr
Doc 836-5
Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16
Page 33 of 55
Case 09-14814-lbr
Doc 836-5
Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16
Page 34 of 55
Case 09-14814-lbr
Doc 836-5
Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16
Page 35 of 55
Case 09-14814-lbr
Doc 836-5
Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16
Page 36 of 55
Case 09-14814-lbr
Doc 836-5
Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16
Page 37 of 55
Case 09-14814-lbr
Doc 836-5
Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16
Page 38 of 55
Case 09-14814-lbr
Doc 836-5
Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16
Page 39 of 55
Case 09-14814-lbr
Doc 836-5
Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16
Page 40 of 55
Case 09-14814-lbr
Doc 836-5
Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16
Page 41 of 55
Case 09-14814-lbr
Doc 836-5
Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16
Page 42 of 55
Case 09-14814-lbr
Doc 836-5
Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16
Page 43 of 55
Case 09-14814-lbr
Doc 836-5
Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16
Page 44 of 55
Case 09-14814-lbr
Doc 836-5
Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16
Page 45 of 55
Case 09-14814-lbr
Doc 836-5
Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16
Page 46 of 55
Case 09-14814-lbr
Doc 836-5
Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16
Page 47 of 55
Case 09-14814-lbr
Doc 836-5
Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16
Page 48 of 55
Case 09-14814-lbr
Doc 836-5
Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16
Page 49 of 55
Case 09-14814-lbr
Doc 836-5
Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16
Page 50 of 55
Case 09-14814-lbr
Doc 836-5
Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16
Page 51 of 55
Case 09-14814-lbr
Doc 836-5
Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16
Page 52 of 55
Case 09-14814-lbr
Doc 836-5
Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16
Page 53 of 55
Case 09-14814-lbr
Doc 836-5
Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16
Page 54 of 55
Case 09-14814-lbr
Doc 836-5
Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16
Page 55 of 55
Case 09-14814-lbr 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Doc 836-6
Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16
Page 1 of 12
EXHIBIT C
11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
73203-001\DOCS_SF:69112.1
Case 09-14814-lbr
Doc 836-6
Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16
Page 2 of 12
October 19, 2009
VIA U.S. FIRST CLASS MAIL Las Vegas Valley Water District c/o Sherilyn A. Olsen, Esq. Holland & Hart, LLP 60 E. South Temple, Ste 2000 Salt Lake City, UT 84111 Re: The Rhodes Companies, et al. Chapter 11 Case No. 09-14814 (Jointly Administered)
S A N F R A N C I S C O, C A L O S A N G E L E S, C A W I L M I N G T O N, D E N E W Y O R K, N Y 150 CALIFORNIA STREET 15th FLOOR SAN FRANCISCO CALIFORNIA 94111-4500

TELEPHONE: FACSIMILE:
415/263 7000
415/263 7010
Dear Ms. Olsen: This firm represents The Rhodes Companies, LLC, Rhode Design and Development Corporation and Rhodes Ranch Golf and Country Club (the Debtors) in their Chapter 11 bankruptcy cases filed in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Nevada (jointly administered under Case No. 09-14814 LBR). You filed three proofs of claim on behalf of Las Vegas Valley Water District, in the Debtors bankruptcy cases as follows:
LOS ANGELES 10100 SANTA MONICA BLVD. 11th FLOOR LOS ANGELES CALIFORNIA 90067-4100
TELEPHONE : 310/277 6910 FACSIMILE: 3 10/201 0760
The Rhodes Companies, LLC (Case No. 09-14814-LBR), in the amount of $74,340.65, designated as Claim No. 72; Rhodes Design and Development Corporation (Case No. 0914846-LBR), in the amount of $11,029.62, designated as Claim No. 138; and Rhodes Ranch Golf and Country Club (Case No. 09-14854LBR), in the amount of $50,418.62, designated as Claim No. 24. With respect to Claim No. 24 filed against Rhodes Ranch Golf and Country Club, the invoice attached to the claim (acct no. 7350542962-2) is a duplicate of an invoice attached to Claim No. 72 filed against The Rhodes Companies, LLC. Therefore we request that you withdraw Claim No. 24. With respect to Claim No. 138 filed against Rhodes Design and Development, LLC, the invoice attached to the claim (acct no. 8714542962-4) is a duplicate of an invoice attached to Claim No. 72
DELAWARE 919 NORTH MARKET STREET 17th FLOOR P.O. BOX 8705 WILMINGTON DELAWARE 19899-8705
TELEPHONE: 302/652 4100 FACSIMILE: 302/652 4400
NEW YORK 788 THIRD AVENUE 36th FLOOR NEW YORK NEW YORK 10017-2024
TELEPHONE: 212/561 7700 FACSIMILE: 212/561 7777
WEB:
www. pszjlaw.com
73203-002\DOCS_SF:68084.1
Case 09-14814-lbr
Doc 836-6
Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16
Page 3 of 12
Ms. Sherilyn A. Olsen, Esq. October 19, 2009 Page 2 filed against The Rhodes Companies, LLC. Therefore we request that you withdraw Claim No. 138. With respect to Claim No. 72 filed against the Rhodes Companies, LLC, the Debtors believe that the balance due under this claim is $72.49. The Debtors have reconciled the invoices attached to Claim No. 72 and provide the following information:
Account No. 1044542986-2 Amount Due Per Invoice 72.49 Status Debtors will pay Invoice is allegedly for a pre-petition pro rata amount, however, the pre-petition periods were previously paid in full by Check No. 7879 in the amount of $14,270.58 and Check No. 7998 in the amount of $8,257.26 (Please see invoices attached hereto showing prepetition amounts due) Invoice is allegedly for a pre-petition pro rata amount, however, the pre-petition periods were previously paid in full by Check No. 7922 in the amount of $81.75 and Check No. 7853 in the amount of $2,256.14 (Please see invoices attached hereto showing prepetition amounts due) This account belongs to Rhodes Ranch HOA a non-debtor entity This account belongs to Rhodes Ranch HOA a non-debtor entity This account belongs to Rhodes Ranch HOA a non-debtor entity This account is for the Rhodes Ranch Golf and Country Club however the services are for the period 03/01/09 03/31/09. The Rhodes Ranch Golf and Country Club is no longer owned by the Debtor. In December 2008, the Debtor sold the Golf Course to a non-Debtor affiliate called Rhodes Ranch Golf, Inc. Therefore, this is a non-debtor invoice
8714542962-4
11,029.62
5725542962-3
2,318.27
040542962-3 8350542962-7 9350542962-6
440.00 8,751.70 1,309.55
7350542962-2
50,418.62
Based upon the above reconciliation, it appears that the Debtors are responsible for $72.49. Therefore, we respectfully request that you withdraw Claim No. 24 against Rhodes Ranch Golf an d Country Club, and Claim No. 138 against Rhodes Design and Development Corporation by signing and returning the enclosed Notice of Withdrawal of Claim
73203-002\DOCS_SF:68084.1
Case 09-14814-lbr
Doc 836-6
Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16
Page 4 of 12
Ms. Sherilyn A. Olsen, Esq. October 19, 2009 Page 3 forms by no later than November 16,2009 so that we may avoid having to object to your claims in the Bankruptcy Court. Furthermore, we also request that you amend Claim No. 72 against the Rhodes Companies, LLC to the amount of $72.49. Please amend Claim No. 72 by signing and returning the enclosed Notice of Amended Claim form by November 16, 2009 so that we may avoid having to object to your claim in the Bankruptcy Court. Thank you. Very truly yours, /s/ Patricia J. Jeffries PJJ Enclosure cc: Michael A. Matteo
73203-002\DOCS_SF:68084.1
Case 09-14814-lbr
Doc 836-6
Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16
Page 5 of 12
1 2 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 3 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: _______________, 2009 _____________________________________
(signature)
In re: RHODES DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, Debtor.
Case No.: BK-S-09-14846-LBR Chapter 11
______________________________________________________________________________ NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF PROOF OF CLAIM NO. 138 ______________________________________________________________________________ LAS VEGAS VALLEY WATER DISTRICT hereby withdraws its proof of claim, designated as Claim No. 138 filed in the above-captioned case.
By: Its:
(print name) (title)
73203-002\DOCS_SF:68121.1
Case 09-14814-lbr
Doc 836-6
Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16
Page 6 of 12
(signature)
In re: THE RHODES COMPANIES, LLC, Debtor.
______________________________________________________________________________ NOTICE OF AMENDED OF PROOF OF CLAIM NO. 72 ______________________________________________________________________________ LAS VEGAS VALLEY WATER DISTRICT hereby amends its proof of claim, designated as Claim No. 72, filed in the amount of $74,340.65, in the above-captioned case, to a proof of claim in the amount of $72.49.
By: Its:
73203-002\DOCS_SF:68123.1
Case 09-14814-lbr
Doc 836-6
Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16
Page 7 of 12
(signature)
In re: RHODES RANCH GOLF AND COUNTRY CLUB, Debtor.
______________________________________________________________________________ NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF PROOF OF CLAIM NO. 24 ______________________________________________________________________________ LAS VEGAS VALLEY WATER DISTRICT hereby withdraws its proof of claim, designated as Claim No. 24 filed in the above-captioned case.
By: Its:
73203-002\DOCS_SF:68122.1
Case 09-14814-lbr 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Doc 836-6
Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16
Page 8 of 12
EXHIBIT D
11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
73203-001\DOCS_SF:69112.1
Case 09-14814-lbr 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Doc 836-6
Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16
Page 9 of 12
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA In re: THE RHODES COMPANIES, LLC, aka Rhodes Homes, et al.,1 Debtors. Affects: All Debtors Affects the following Debtor(s): The Rhodes Companies, LLC 09-14814; Rhodes Design and Development Corporation 09-14846; and Rhodes Ranch Golf and Country Club 09-14854 Hearing Date: January 14, 2010 Hearing Time: 9:00 a.m. Courtroom 1 Case No.: BK-S-09-14814-LBR (Jointly Administered) Chapter 11
11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
ORDER GRANTING DEBTORS OMNIBUS OBJECTION TO LAS VEGAS VALLEY WATER DISTRICTS CLAIMS PURSUANT TO SECTION 502(b) OF THE BANKRUPTCY CODE AND BANKRUPTCY RULES 3003 AND 3007 [DOCKET NO. ___]
The Debtors in these cases, along with their case numbers are: Heritage Land Company, LLC (Case No. 0914778); The Rhodes Companies, LLC (Case No. 09-14814); Tribes Holdings, LLC (Case No. 09-14817); Apache Framing, LLC (Case No. 09-14818); Geronimo Plumbing LLC (Case No. 09-14820); Gung-Ho Concrete LLC (Case No. 09-14822); Bravo, Inc. (Case No. 09-14825); Elkhorn Partners, A Nevada Limited Partnership (Case No. 0914828); Six Feathers Holdings, LLC (Case No. 09-14833); Elkhorn Investments, Inc. (Case No. 09-14837); Jarupa, LLC (Case No. 09-14839); Rhodes Realty, Inc. (Case No. 09-14841); C & J Holdings, Inc. (Case No. 09-14843); Rhodes Ranch General Partnership (Case No. 09-14844); Rhodes Design and Development Corporation (Case No. 09-14846); Parcel 20, LLC (Case No. 09-14848); Tuscany Acquisitions IV, LLC (Case No. 09-14849); Tuscany Acquisitions III, LLC (Case No. 09-14850); Tuscany Acquisitions II, LLC (Case No. 09-14852); Tuscany Acquisitions, LLC (Case No. 09-14853); Rhodes Ranch Golf and Country Club, LLC (Case No. 09-14854); Overflow, LP (Case No. 09-14856); Wallboard, LP (Case No. 09-14858); Jackknife, LP (Case No. 09-14860); Batcave, LP (Case No. 09-14861); Chalkline, LP (Case No. 09-14862); Glynda, LP (Case No. 09-14865); Tick, LP (Case No. 09-14866); Rhodes Arizona Properties, LLC (Case No. 09-14868); Rhodes Homes Arizona, L.L.C. (Case No. 09-14882); Tuscany Golf Country Club, LLC (Case No. 09-14884); and Pinnacle Grading, LLC (Case No. 0914887).
73203-001\DOCS_SF:69112.1
Case 09-14814-lbr
Doc 836-6
Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16
Page 10 of 12
1 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 10 11 11 12 12 13 13 14 14 15 15 16 16 17 17 18 18 19 19 20 20 21 21 22 22 23 23 24 24 25 25 26 26 27 27 28 28
Upon consideration of the Debtors Omnibus Objection to Las Vegas Valley Water Districts Claims Pursuant to Section 502(b) of the Bankruptcy Code and Bankruptcy Rules 3003 and 3007 [Docket No. ___] (the Omnibus Objection),2 filed by above-captioned debtors and debtors in possession (collectively, the Debtors), requesting that the Court enter an order disallowing and or reclassifying the LVVWD Claims as set forth in the Column marked Proposed Treatment/Disposition in Exhibit A attached hereto; and the Court having jurisdiction to consider the Omnibus Objection and the relief requested therein pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 157 and 1334; and the relief requested therein being a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 157(b); and venue being proper before this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1408 and 1409; and the Court having reviewed the Omnibus Objection; the Court hereby finds and determines that, pursuant to Rule 3007 of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure, due and proper notice has been provided to the holders of the LVVWD Claims and all other parties entitled to notice; and no other or further notice is necessary; and the relief requested in the Omnibus Objection is in the best interests of the Debtors, their estates and creditors; and that the legal and factual bases set forth in the Omnibus Objection establishes just cause for the relief requested therein; therefore IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. 2. The Omnibus Objection is granted. The LVVWD Claims identified on Exhibit A are hereby disallowed in their
entirety, or reduced, as set forth in the column marked Proposed Treatment/Disposition in Exhibit A attached hereto. 3. This Court shall retain jurisdiction to hear and determine all matters arising from
the implementation of this Order.
Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Omnibus Objection.
73203-001\DOCS_SF:69112.1
Case 09-14814-lbr
Doc 836-6
Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16
Page 11 of 12
APPROVED/DISAPPROVED: 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 10 11 11 12 12 13 13 14 14 15 15 16 16 17 17 18 18 19 19 20 20 21 21 22 22 23 23 24 24 25 25 26 26 27 27 28 28 DATED this 14th day of January, 2010. By: UNITED STATES TRUSTEE August B. Landis Office of the United States Trustee 300 Las Vegas Blvd. S., Ste. 4300 Las Vegas, NV 89101
Submitted by: DATED this 14th day of January, 2010. By: /s/ Zachariah Larson LARSON & STEPHENS Zachariah Larson, Esq. (NV Bar No 7787) Kyle O. Stephens, Esq. (NV Bar No. 7928) 810 S. Casino Center Blvd., Ste. 104 Las Vegas, NV 89101 (702) 382-1170 (Telephone) (702) 382-1169 zlarson@lslawnv.com Attorneys for Debtors
73203-001\DOCS_SF:69112.1
Case 09-14814-lbr 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Doc 836-6
Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16 LR 9021 Certification
Page 12 of 12
In accordance with LR 9021, counsel submitting this document certifies as follows (check one): ___ The court has waived the requirement of approval under LR 9021. _ No parties appeared or filed written objections, and there is no trustee appointed in the case. ___ I have delivered a copy of this proposed order to all counsel who appeared at the hearing, any unrepresented parties who appeared at the hearing, and any trustee appointed in this case, and each has approved or disapproved the order, or failed to respond, as indicated below.
Submitted by: DATED this 14th day of January, 2010. By: /s/ Zachariah Larson LARSON & STEPHENS Zachariah Larson, Esq. (NV Bar No 7787) Kyle O. Stephens, Esq. (NV Bar No. 7928) 810 S. Casino Center Blvd., Ste. 104 Las Vegas, NV 89101 (702) 382-1170 (Telephone) (702) 382-1169 zlarson@lslawnv.com Attorneys for Debtors
11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
73203-001\DOCS_SF:69112.1

United States Bankruptcy Court District of Nevada

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

United States Bankruptcy Court District of Nevada

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Case 09-14814-lbr 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16

E-File: December 14, 2009

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 15 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16

Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16

Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16

On or about November 4, 2009, counsel to LVVWD responded to Debtors letter

Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16

Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16

Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16

Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16

I believe that granting the relief requested in the Omnibus Objection is in

/s/ Paul D. Huygens Paul D. Huygens

Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16

Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16

Disallow claim in its entirety

Disallow claim in its entirety

Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16

Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16

Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16

Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16

Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16

Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16

Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16

Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16

Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16

Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16

Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16

Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16

Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16

Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16

Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16

Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16

Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16

Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16

Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16

Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16

Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16

Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16

Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16

Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16

Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16

Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16

Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16

Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16

Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16

Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16

Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16

Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16

Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16

Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16

Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16

Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16

Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16

Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16

Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16

Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16

Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16

Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16

Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16

Entered 12/14/09 16:55:16