You are on page 1of 26

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION In re: COLLINS & AIKMAN CORPORATION,

et al.1 Debtors. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Chapter 11 Case No. 05-55927 (SWR) (Jointly Administered) (Tax Identification #13-3489233) Honorable Steven W. Rhodes
Hearing Date (if necessary): January 11, 2007 at 2:00 p.m. Objection Deadline: January 8, 2007 at 4:00 p.m.

DEBTORS SEVENTH MOTION FOR AN ORDER EXTENDING THE EXCLUSIVITY PERIODS TO FILE A CHAPTER 11 PLAN AND TO SOLICIT VOTES THEREON The above-captioned debtors (collectively, the Debtors) hereby move the Court (this Motion) for the entry of an order, substantially in the form of Exhibit A, extending the Debtors exclusivity periods to file a chapter 11 plan and to solicit votes thereon. In support of this Motion, the Debtors respectfully state as follows:

The Debtors in the jointly administered cases include: Collins & Aikman Corporation; Amco Convertible Fabrics, Inc., Case No. 05-55949; Becker Group, LLC (d/b/a/ Collins & Aikman Premier Mold), Case No. 05-55977; Brut Plastics, Inc., Case No. 05-55957; Collins & Aikman (Gibraltar) Limited, Case No. 05-55989; Collins & Aikman Accessory Mats, Inc. (f/k/a the Akro Corporation), Case No. 05-55952; Collins & Aikman Asset Services, Inc., Case No. 05-55959; Collins & Aikman Automotive (Argentina), Inc. (f/k/a Textron Automotive (Argentina), Inc.), Case No. 05-55965; Collins & Aikman Automotive (Asia), Inc. (f/k/a Textron Automotive (Asia), Inc.), Case No. 05-55991; Collins & Aikman Automotive Exteriors, Inc. (f/k/a Textron Automotive Exteriors, Inc.), Case No. 05-55958; Collins & Aikman Automotive Interiors, Inc. (f/k/a Textron Automotive Interiors, Inc.), Case No. 05-55956; Collins & Aikman Automotive International, Inc., Case No. 05-55980; Collins & Aikman Automotive International Services, Inc. (f/k/a Textron Automotive International Services, Inc.), Case No. 05-55985; Collins & Aikman Automotive Mats, LLC, Case No. 05-55969; Collins & Aikman Automotive Overseas Investment, Inc. (f/k/a Textron Automotive Overseas Investment, Inc.), Case No. 05-55978; Collins & Aikman Automotive Services, LLC, Case No. 05-55981; Collins & Aikman Canada Domestic Holding Company, Case No. 05-55930; Collins & Aikman Carpet & Acoustics (MI), Inc., Case No. 05-55982; Collins & Aikman Carpet & Acoustics (TN), Inc., Case No. 05-55984; Collins & Aikman Development Company, Case No. 05-55943; Collins & Aikman Europe, Inc., Case No. 05-55971; Collins & Aikman Fabrics, Inc. (d/b/a Joan Automotive Industries, Inc.), Case No. 05-55963; Collins & Aikman Intellimold, Inc. (d/b/a M&C Advanced Processes, Inc.), Case No. 05-55976; Collins & Aikman Interiors, Inc., Case No. 05-55970; Collins & Aikman International Corporation, Case No. 05-55951; Collins & Aikman Plastics, Inc., Case No. 05-55960; Collins & Aikman Products Co., Case No. 05-55932; Collins & Aikman Properties, Inc., Case No. 05-55964; Comet Acoustics, Inc., Case No. 05-55972; CW Management Corporation, Case No. 05-55979; Dura Convertible Systems, Inc., Case No. 05-55942; Gamble Development Company, Case No. 05-55974; JPS Automotive, Inc. (d/b/a PACJ, Inc.), Case No. 05-55935; New Baltimore Holdings, LLC, Case No. 05-55992; Owosso Thermal Forming, LLC, Case No. 0555946; Southwest Laminates, Inc. (d/b/a Southwest Fabric Laminators Inc.), Case No. 05-55948; Wickes Asset Management, Inc., Case No. 0555962; and Wickes Manufacturing Company, Case No. 05-55968.

K&E 11548589.3

0W[;&,;

0555927061227000000000012

,2

Introduction As the Debtors have disclosed to the Court and publicly, to maximize the value of the Debtors estates and save jobs, the Debtors are pursuing a cooperative sale process, which the Debtors expect will culminate with the confirmation of a chapter 11 plan. In connection with this process, the Debtors recently negotiated, and the Court recently approved on an interim basis, an agreement (the Customer Agreement) with the agent to the Debtors senior, secured prepetition lenders (the Agent), the agent to the Debtors senior, secured postpetition lenders (the DIP Agent, and collectively with the Agent, the Agents) and the Debtors principal customers (the Customers) that, among other things: (a) provides for a framework to facilitate the orderly sale of a majority of the Debtors businesses with the support of the Agents and the Customers; (b) provides a meaningful opportunity to save thousands of jobs; (c) memorializes an agreement among the Debtors, the Agents and the Customers on the substantive terms of a chapter 11 plan; and, ultimately, (d) provides a clear framework toward a consensual resolution and conclusion to these highly complex cases. As a result of the approval of the Customer Agreement, the Debtors recently filed their first amended chapter 11 plan and accompanying disclosure statement. The Agents and the Customers three of the Debtors four largest and most influential creditor constituencies have agreed to support the plan under the terms set forth in the Customer Agreement, thereby providing a path to the Debtors exit from bankruptcy protection. Upon information and belief, the Agent and the official committee of unsecured creditors (the Committee) will soon re-engage in negotiations regarding the plan, and the Debtors are hopeful that such negotiations will result in a consensual plan among all of the Debtors principal creditor constituencies. Accordingly, more time is needed to negotiate the terms of a consensual plan with the Committee and to incorporate such terms into the plan for this Courts approval. 2
K&E 11548589.3

Further, as contemplated under the Customer Agreement and the Debtors plan, the Debtors are continuing their efforts to market and sell substantially all of their assets. Pursuant to the Customer Agreement, the Debtors intend to complete this process by the end of June 2007. Accordingly, the Debtors believe that it is important to the stability of these cases that the Debtors maintain their exclusive right to propose and file a chapter 11 plan (the Plan Proposal Period) and to solicit and obtain acceptances of such a plan (the Solicitation Period, and together with the Plan Proposal Period, the Exclusivity Periods) during this critical juncture. Indeed, extending the Exclusivity Periods certainly does not harm parties in interest and terminating the Exclusivity Periods could expose these cases to needless disruption that could jeopardize the significant progress that the Debtors have made to date toward concluding these cases. For the reasons set forth herein and as will be established on the record at the hearing on this Motion, the Debtors respectfully assert that there is sufficient cause for this Court to grant the Debtors request for a 120-day extension of the Exclusivity Periods. Jurisdiction 1. The Court has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1334. This

matter is a core proceeding within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. 157(b)(2). 2. 3. Venue is proper pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1408 and 1409. The statutory basis for the relief requested herein is section 1121 of the

Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. 101-1330 (the Bankruptcy Code). Background 4. On May 17, 2005 (the Petition Date), the Debtors filed their voluntary

petitions for relief under chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code. The Debtors are operating their businesses and managing their properties as debtors in possession pursuant to sections 1107(a) and 1108 of the Bankruptcy Code. No trustee or examiner has been appointed in these cases. On the 3
K&E 11548589.3

Petition Date, the Court entered an order jointly administering these cases pursuant to Rule 1015(b) of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure. 5. On May 24, 2005, the United States trustee appointed the Committee pursuant

to section 1102 of the Bankruptcy Code. 6. The Court previously granted the Debtors first six motions to extend the

Exclusivity Periods (respectively, the First Extension Motion, the Second Extension Motion, the Third Extension Motion, the Fourth Extension Motion, the Fifth Extension Motion and the Sixth Extension Motion), the last of which extended the Debtors Plan Proposal Period from October 27, 2006 through and including December 27, 2006 and extended the Debtors Solicitation Period from December 27, 2006 through and including February 26, 2007. 7. On December 13, 2006, the Court entered an order [Docket No. 3735]

granting the Debtors motion for a bridge order extending the Plan Proposal Period from December 27, 2006 through and including January 12, 2007 and extending the Solicitation Period from February 26, 2007 through and including March 14, 2007, without prejudice to the Debtors rights to seek additional extensions thereof. 8. On December 14, 2006, the Court entered an order [Docket No. 3756]

approving the Customer Agreement on an interim basis. 9. On December 22, 2006, the Debtors filed the First Amended Joint Plan of

Collins & Aikman Corporation and Its Debtor Subsidiaries [Docket No. 3814] (the Plan) and the disclosure statement related thereto [Docket No. 3813] (the Disclosure Statement). In connection with the Plan, the Debtors anticipate that the Agent will re-engage in negotiations with the Committee to achieve a consensual chapter 11 plan.

4
K&E 11548589.3

Relief Requested 10. By this Motion, the Debtors request the entry of an order, pursuant to

section 1121(d) of the Bankruptcy Code, further extending the Debtors Plan Proposal Period from January 12, 2007 through and including May 14, 2007, and further extending the Debtors Solicitation Period from March 14, 2007 through and including July 12, 2007, without prejudice to the Debtors rights to seek additional extensions thereof.2 Basis for Relief 11. The Bankruptcy Code provides that, following the commencement of a

chapter 11 case, a debtor has the exclusive right for 120 days to propose and file a chapter 11 plan and the exclusive right for 180 days to solicit and obtain acceptances of such a plan. See 11 U.S.C. 1121 (b), (c)(3).3 12. If the Exclusivity Periods do not afford adequate time for a chapter 11 debtor

to propose a plan, a Bankruptcy Court may for cause grant a motion to extend them. Id. at 1121(d); see also In re Serv. Merch. Co., Inc., et al., 256 B.R. 744, 751 (Bankr. M.D. Tenn. 2000) (citing In re All Seasons Indus., Inc., 121 B.R. 1002 (Bankr. N.D. Ind. 1990)). Indeed, Congress recognized that courts may need to extend the Exclusivity Periods depending on the circumstances of the case, and explicitly noted, [f]or example, if an unusually large company were to seek reorganization under chapter 11, the court would probably need to extend the time in order to allow the debtor to reach an agreement. H.R. Rep. No. 595, 95th Cong., 1st Sess. 220 (1977) (hereinafter, House Report) (footnotes omitted); see also In re Timbers of Inwood Forest Assocs., Ltd., 808 F.2d 363 (5th Cir. 1987), affd, 484 U.S. 365 (1988).
2 3

The Debtors will present evidence before or at the hearing on this Motion in support of the relief they seek. In the interest of brevity, the Debtors will not restate here the full discussion at 10-17 of their First Exclusivity Motion relating to the Congressional purpose and policy underlying the exclusivity period and, instead, incorporate that argument herein by reference.

5
K&E 11548589.3

13.

The Bankruptcy Code does not define what constitutes cause justifying an

extension of the Exclusivity Periods, but the legislative history and case law emphasize that courts have the discretion to remain flexible in promoting the orderly, consensual and successful reorganization of a debtors affairs. House Report at 232; In re AMKO Plastics, Inc., 197 B.R. 74, 77 (Bankr. S.D. Ohio 1996) (stating the for cause standard in determining an exclusivity extension leave[s] the question to the reorganization court in the exercise of its discretion and to promote maximum flexibility to suit various types of reorganization proceedings); In re RCN Anlagenivestitionen Frodsgesellschaft II-Kommanditgessellschaft, 118 B.R. 460, 462 (W.D. Mich. 1990) (same). 14. Courts consider a number of factors to determine whether cause exists to

extend the Exclusivity Periods, any of which may provide sufficient grounds for doing so. See e.g., AMKO, 197 B.R. at 77; In re Express One Intl, Inc., 194 B.R. 98, 100 (Bankr. E.D. Tex. 1996); In re McLean Indus., Inc., 87 B.R. 830, 834 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 1987); In re Dow Corning Corp., 208 B.R. 661, 664 (Bankr. E.D. Mich. 1983). Among the factors that courts analyze are: (a) the size and complexity of the chapter 11 case;4 (b) the debtors progress in the chapter 11 case;5 and (c) whether an extension of the Exclusivity Periods will harm the debtors creditors.6 Ultimately, the primary consideration should be whether or not [granting an extension] would facilitate moving the case forward. Dow Corning, 208 B.R. at 664-670 (analyzing eight factors which are mostly

See, e.g., In re The Elder Beerman Stores Corp., 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23785, at *4 (S.D. Ohio 1997); In re Texaco, Inc., 76 B.R. 322, 326-27 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 1987). See, e.g., McLean, 87 B.R. at 834; Jasik v. Conrad (In re Jasik), 727 F.2d 1379, 1382 (5th Cir. 1984); AMKO, 197 B.R. at 77; Serv. Merch., 256 B.R. at 751. See, e.g., In re Grand Traverse Devp Co. Ltd. Pship, 147 B.R. 418, 420 (Bankr. W.D. Mich. 1992); In re Gibson & Cushman, 101 B.R. 405, 409 (E.D.N.Y. 1989).

6
K&E 11548589.3

subsumed within the list above before concluding that the most important factor is the practical call of whether an extension would facilitate progress in the chapter 11 case). 15. Here, sufficient cause exists to grant the Debtors requested extension of the

Exclusivity Periods. An additional extension of the Exclusivity Periods is both necessary and proper to permit the Debtors sufficient time to negotiate a chapter 11 plan containing appropriate treatment of creditors. A. The Debtors Chapter 11 Cases Are Large And Complex. 16. Perhaps because Congress expressly noted that courts may need to extend

Exclusivity Periods for unusually large or complex cases, House Report at 232, this is the basis upon which courts most commonly grant extensions. See, e.g., Express One Intl, 194 B.R. at 100; Texaco, 76 B.R. at 326 (finding cause to extend exclusivity based on size of cases); In re Manville Forest Prods. Corp., 31 B.R. 991, 995 (S.D.N.Y. 1978) (same). 17. As the Debtors have described at greater length in prior pleadings,7 their cases

are undeniably large and complex. It is unnecessary to again restate all of the relevant statistics, but the following key points remain: the Debtors cases are among the largest filed in the United States in the past year and among the largest ever filed in this district; there are 38 debtor entities with domestic and foreign operations that generate approximately $2.5 billion in combined revenue;8 and the Debtors operate approximately 45 manufacturing and/or assembly facilities located in the United States, Canada and Mexico.

7 8

See First Extension Motion, at 18-23. Excluding the Debtors European operations.

7
K&E 11548589.3

18.

Accordingly, the Debtors respectfully submit that the size and complexity of

these cases alone constitute sufficient cause to grant the Debtors request to further extend the Exclusivity Periods. B. The Debtors Have Made Significant Progress In These Chapter 11 Cases Since The Court Granted The Sixth Extension Motion. 19. Again, when evaluating a debtors progress in its chapter 11 case, the

primary consideration should be whether or not [granting an extension] would facilitate moving the case forward. Dow Corning, 208 B.R. at 664-670. As the Debtors have described at greater lengths in prior pleadings, the Debtors have made and are continuing to make substantial progress in these cases.9 20. Such progress is directly reflected by the Debtors filing of the plan and the

disclosure statement with the support of the Agents and the Customers, which is a sufficient basis to extend the Exclusivity Periods. See, e.g., In re Meridian Auto, Sys.-Composites Operations Inc., Case No. 05-11168 (MFW) (Bankr. D. Del. June 13, 2006) (extending the Exclusivity Periods in light of the fact that a chapter 11 plan had been filed by the debtors). 21. Upon information and belief, the Agent and the Committee will soon

re-engage in negotiations regarding the plan. Although all parties will continue to work in good faith toward the goal of a consensual plan, more time is needed so that the parties can complete their negotiations and the terms of any agreement can be incorporated into the plan for this Courts approval. Indeed, the Debtors are hopeful that these negotiations will result in a consensual plan among all of the Debtors principal creditor constituencies.

See Third Extension Motion, at 21-43; Fourth Extension Motion, at 19-26 . In the interest of brevity, the Debtors will not restate here the full discussion at 21-43 of their Third Extension Motion or 19-26 of their Fourth Extension Motion relating to the progress the Debtors have made in these cases and, instead, incorporate those statements herein by reference.

8
K&E 11548589.3

22.

Additionally, as contemplated under the Customer Agreement and the Plan,

the Debtors have embarked on a sale process to maximize the value that can be realized from the Debtors businesses and assets. The sale process contemplates, among other things: (a) a going concern sale of the Debtors carpet & acoustics business; (b) going concern sales of certain plants or divisions in the Debtors plastics business segment and the Debtors convertibles business; (c) an orderly wind-down of the Debtors non-salable business operations in cooperation with the Customers; (d) sales of all remaining assets; and (e) preservation of the Debtors working capital assets and mitigation of administrative claims and other wind-down costs to the extent possible. Pursuant to the Customer Agreement, the Debtors intend to complete this process by the end of June 2007. 23. Accordingly, the extension of the Exclusivity Periods requested in this

Motion is intended to enable the Debtors to continue the plan and sale process in an orderly, efficient and cost-effective manner for the benefit of all parties. To deny a further extension of the Exclusivity Periods at this critical juncture would only inject the possibility of disruption to these cases and the Debtors ongoing negotiations with their principal creditor constituencies. Therefore, the filing of one or more competing plans would unnecessarily complicate and delay a plan process that the Debtors hope to culminate over the next few months. C. Further Extending The Exclusivity Periods Will Not Prejudice Creditors. 24. Creditors would not be harmed by further extending the Exclusivity Periods,

which would merely allow the Debtors to continue without undue restrictions their tangible progress toward confirming a chapter 11 plan. On the other hand, allowing the Exclusivity Periods to expire before the Debtors, creditors and other parties in interest can complete their negotiations would defeat the Congressional purpose behind section 1121 of the Bankruptcy Code to provide

9
K&E 11548589.3

debtors with a meaningful and reasonable amount of time to propose and confirm a consensual chapter 11 plan. 25. Again, as previously discussed, the Debtors continue to make substantial Because of the

progress in these cases, but critical negotiations and actions remain.

Exclusivity Periods, the Debtors have thus far been able to pursue their difficult and necessary work without the distractions of other parties filing competing plans. 26. Additionally, the Debtors continue to communicate regularly with all of their

major constituencies. The Committee, the Agents, the Customers as well as other constituencies have extraordinary access to the Debtors executives, professionals and financial information. The Debtors believe this transparent interaction has fostered a cooperative relationship and allowed all constituencies to serve a constructive role in all facets of the Debtors restructuring efforts. 27. similar cases. Finally, the Debtors request is reasonable in light of relief granted in other This Court and other courts routinely grant further extensions of the

Exclusivity Periods in large reorganization cases. See, e.g., In re Tower Auto., Inc., Case No. 0510578 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. November 30, 2006) (ALG) (first eight exclusivity orders granting extension of 20 months); In re Meridian Auto, Sys.-Composites Operations Inc., Case No. 05-11168 (Bankr. D. Del. October 24, 2006) (MFW) (first six exclusivity orders granting extension of 17 months); In re Intermet Corp., Case No. 04-67597 (MBM) (Bankr. E.D. Mich. April 23, 2005) (first two exclusivity orders granting extension of eight months); In re Serv. Merch., Inc., Case No. 99-02649 (Bankr. M.D. Tenn. February 2, 2000) (first two exclusivity orders granting extension of 21 months). 28. The Debtors are mindful of the desire of creditors and all parties in interest for

the Debtors to emerge from chapter 11 as soon as possible. Indeed, the Debtors share this common

10
K&E 11548589.3

goal. To that end, the Debtors require the additional time requested herein to afford them the ability to negotiate and confirm a plan. Notice 29. Notice of this Motion has been given to the Core Group and Affected Parties

as required by the Case Management Procedures.10 In light of the nature of the relief requested, the Debtors submit that no further notice is required. No Prior Request 30. other court. No prior motion for the relief requested herein has been made to this or any

10

Capitalized terms used in this paragraph 29 not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings set forth in the First Amended Notice, Case Management and Administrative Procedures filed on June 9, 2005 [Docket No. 294].

11
K&E 11548589.3

WHEREFORE, the Debtors respectfully request the entry of an order, substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A, (a) extending the Plan Proposal Period from January 12, 2007 through and including May 14, 2007, (b) extending the Solicitation Period from March 14, 2007 through and including July 12, 2007 and (c) granting such other and further relief as is just and proper. Dated: December 27, 2006 KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP /s/ Ray C. Schrock Richard M. Cieri (NY RC 6062) Citigroup Center 153 East 53rd Street New York, New York 10022 Telephone: (212) 446-4800 Facsimile: (212) 446-4900 -andDavid L. Eaton (IL 3122303) Ray C. Schrock (IL 6257005) Marc J. Carmel (IL 6272032) 200 East Randolph Drive Chicago, Illinois 60601 Telephone: (312) 861-2000 Facsimile: (312) 861-2200 -andCARSON FISCHER, P.L.C. Joseph M. Fischer (P13452) 4111 West Andover Road West - Second Floor Bloomfield Hills, Michigan 48302 Telephone: (248) 644-4840 Facsimile: (248) 644-1832 Co-Counsel for the Debtors

12
K&E 11548589.3

EXHIBIT A

K&E 11548589.3

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION In re: COLLINS & AIKMAN CORPORATION, et al.1 Debtors. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Chapter 11 Case No. 05-55927 (SWR) (Jointly Administered) (Tax Identification #13-3489233) Honorable Steven W. Rhodes

ORDER EXTENDING THE DEBTORS EXCLUSIVITY PERIODS TO FILE A CHAPTER 11 PLAN AND TO SOLICIT VOTES THEREON Upon the motion (the Motion)2 of the above-captioned debtors (collectively, the Debtors) for an order extending the Debtors Exclusivity Periods to file a chapter 11 plan and to solicit votes thereon; it appearing that the relief requested is in the best interests of the Debtors estates; it appearing that the Court has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 157 and 1334; it appearing that this proceeding is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 157(b)(2); it appearing that venue of this proceeding and the Motion in this District is proper pursuant to 28

The Debtors in the jointly administered cases include: Collins & Aikman Corporation; Amco Convertible Fabrics, Inc., Case No. 05-55949; Becker Group, LLC (d/b/a/ Collins & Aikman Premier Mold), Case No. 05-55977; Brut Plastics, Inc., Case No. 05-55957; Collins & Aikman (Gibraltar) Limited, Case No. 05-55989; Collins & Aikman Accessory Mats, Inc. (f/k/a the Akro Corporation), Case No. 05-55952; Collins & Aikman Asset Services, Inc., Case No. 05-55959; Collins & Aikman Automotive (Argentina), Inc. (f/k/a Textron Automotive (Argentina), Inc.), Case No. 05-55965; Collins & Aikman Automotive (Asia), Inc. (f/k/a Textron Automotive (Asia), Inc.), Case No. 05-55991; Collins & Aikman Automotive Exteriors, Inc. (f/k/a Textron Automotive Exteriors, Inc.), Case No. 05-55958; Collins & Aikman Automotive Interiors, Inc. (f/k/a Textron Automotive Interiors, Inc.), Case No. 05-55956; Collins & Aikman Automotive International, Inc., Case No. 05-55980; Collins & Aikman Automotive International Services, Inc. (f/k/a Textron Automotive International Services, Inc.), Case No. 05-55985; Collins & Aikman Automotive Mats, LLC, Case No. 05-55969; Collins & Aikman Automotive Overseas Investment, Inc. (f/k/a Textron Automotive Overseas Investment, Inc.), Case No. 05-55978; Collins & Aikman Automotive Services, LLC, Case No. 05-55981; Collins & Aikman Canada Domestic Holding Company, Case No. 05-55930; Collins & Aikman Carpet & Acoustics (MI), Inc., Case No. 05-55982; Collins & Aikman Carpet & Acoustics (TN), Inc., Case No. 05-55984; Collins & Aikman Development Company, Case No. 05-55943; Collins & Aikman Europe, Inc., Case No. 05-55971; Collins & Aikman Fabrics, Inc. (d/b/a Joan Automotive Industries, Inc.), Case No. 05-55963; Collins & Aikman Intellimold, Inc. (d/b/a M&C Advanced Processes, Inc.), Case No. 05-55976; Collins & Aikman Interiors, Inc., Case No. 05-55970; Collins & Aikman International Corporation, Case No. 05-55951; Collins & Aikman Plastics, Inc., Case No. 05-55960; Collins & Aikman Products Co., Case No. 05-55932; Collins & Aikman Properties, Inc., Case No. 05-55964; Comet Acoustics, Inc., Case No. 05-55972; CW Management Corporation, Case No. 05-55979; Dura Convertible Systems, Inc., Case No. 05-55942; Gamble Development Company, Case No. 05-55974; JPS Automotive, Inc. (d/b/a PACJ, Inc.), Case No. 05-55935; New Baltimore Holdings, LLC, Case No. 05-55992; Owosso Thermal Forming, LLC, Case No. 0555946; Southwest Laminates, Inc. (d/b/a Southwest Fabric Laminators Inc.), Case No. 05-55948; Wickes Asset Management, Inc., Case No. 0555962; and Wickes Manufacturing Company, Case No. 05-55968. Capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings set forth in the Motion.

U.S.C. 1408 and 1409; it appearing that notice of the Motion and the opportunity for a hearing on the Motion was appropriate under the particular circumstances and that no other or further notice need be given; and after due deliberation and sufficient cause appearing therefor, it is hereby ORDERED 1. 2. May 14, 2007. 3. July 12, 2007. 4. This relief is without prejudice to the Debtors right to seek a further extension of the The Solicitation Period is extended from March 14, 2007 through and including The Motion is granted in its entirety. The Plan Proposal Period is extended from January 12, 2007 through and including

Exclusivity Periods. 5. The Debtors are authorized to take all actions necessary to effectuate the relief

granted pursuant to this Order in accordance with the Motion. 6. upon its entry. 7. The Court retains jurisdiction with respect to all matters arising from or related to the The terms and conditions of this Order shall be immediately effective and enforceable

implementation of this Order.

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION In re: COLLINS & AIKMAN CORPORATION, et al.1 Debtors. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Chapter 11 Case No. 05-55927 (SWR) (Jointly Administered) (Tax Identification #13-3489233) Honorable Steven W. Rhodes

NOTICE AND OPPORTUNITY TO RESPOND TO THE DEBTORS SEVENTH MOTION FOR AN ORDER EXTENDING THE DEBTORS EXCLUSIVITY PERIODS TO FILE A CHAPTER 11 PLAN AND TO SOLICIT VOTES THEREON PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT the above-captioned debtors (collectively, the Debtors) have filed the Debtors Seventh Motion for an Order Extending the Debtors Exclusivity Periods to File a Chapter 11 Plan and to Solicit Votes Thereon (the Motion). PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE THAT your rights may be affected. You may wish to review the Motion and discuss it with your attorney. (If you do not have an attorney, you may wish to consult one.)

The Debtors in the jointly administered cases include: Collins & Aikman Corporation; Amco Convertible Fabrics, Inc., Case No. 05-55949; Becker Group, LLC (d/b/a/ Collins & Aikman Premier Mold), Case No. 05-55977; Brut Plastics, Inc., Case No. 05-55957; Collins & Aikman (Gibraltar) Limited, Case No. 05-55989; Collins & Aikman Accessory Mats, Inc. (f/k/a the Akro Corporation), Case No. 05-55952; Collins & Aikman Asset Services, Inc., Case No. 05-55959; Collins & Aikman Automotive (Argentina), Inc. (f/k/a Textron Automotive (Argentina), Inc.), Case No. 05-55965; Collins & Aikman Automotive (Asia), Inc. (f/k/a Textron Automotive (Asia), Inc.), Case No. 05-55991; Collins & Aikman Automotive Exteriors, Inc. (f/k/a Textron Automotive Exteriors, Inc.), Case No. 05-55958; Collins & Aikman Automotive Interiors, Inc. (f/k/a Textron Automotive Interiors, Inc.), Case No. 05-55956; Collins & Aikman Automotive International, Inc., Case No. 05-55980; Collins & Aikman Automotive International Services, Inc. (f/k/a Textron Automotive International Services, Inc.), Case No. 05-55985; Collins & Aikman Automotive Mats, LLC, Case No. 05-55969; Collins & Aikman Automotive Overseas Investment, Inc. (f/k/a Textron Automotive Overseas Investment, Inc.), Case No. 05-55978; Collins & Aikman Automotive Services, LLC, Case No. 05-55981; Collins & Aikman Canada Domestic Holding Company, Case No. 05-55930; Collins & Aikman Carpet & Acoustics (MI), Inc., Case No. 05-55982; Collins & Aikman Carpet & Acoustics (TN), Inc., Case No. 05-55984; Collins & Aikman Development Company, Case No. 05-55943; Collins & Aikman Europe, Inc., Case No. 05-55971; Collins & Aikman Fabrics, Inc. (d/b/a Joan Automotive Industries, Inc.), Case No. 05-55963; Collins & Aikman Intellimold, Inc. (d/b/a M&C Advanced Processes, Inc.), Case No. 05-55976; Collins & Aikman Interiors, Inc., Case No. 05-55970; Collins & Aikman International Corporation, Case No. 05-55951; Collins & Aikman Plastics, Inc., Case No. 05-55960; Collins & Aikman Products Co., Case No. 05-55932; Collins & Aikman Properties, Inc., Case No. 05-55964; Comet Acoustics, Inc., Case No. 05-55972; CW Management Corporation, Case No. 05-55979; Dura Convertible Systems, Inc., Case No. 05-55942; Gamble Development Company, Case No. 05-55974; JPS Automotive, Inc. (d/b/a PACJ, Inc.), Case No. 05-55935; New Baltimore Holdings, LLC, Case No. 05-55992; Owosso Thermal Forming, LLC, Case No. 0555946; Southwest Laminates, Inc. (d/b/a Southwest Fabric Laminators Inc.), Case No. 05-55948; Wickes Asset Management, Inc., Case No. 0555962; and Wickes Manufacturing Company, Case No. 05-55968.

K&E 11548589.3

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE THAT, in accordance with the First Amended Notice, Case Management and Administrative Procedures filed on June 9, 2005 [Docket No. 294] (the Case Management Procedures), if you wish to object to the Court granting the relief sought in the Motion, or if you want the Court to otherwise consider your views on the Motion, no later than January 8, 2007 at 4:00 p.m. prevailing Eastern Time, or such shorter time as the Court may hereafter order and of which you may receive subsequent notice, you or your attorney must file with the Court a written response, explaining your position at:2 United States Bankruptcy Court 211 West Fort Street, Suite 2100 Detroit, Michigan 48226 PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE THAT if you mail your response to the Court for filing, you must mail it early enough so the Court will receive it on or before the date above. PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE THAT you must also serve the documents so that they are received on or before January 8, 2007 at 4:00 p.m. prevailing Eastern Time, in accordance with the Case Management Procedures, including to: Kirkland & Ellis LLP Attn: Richard M. Cieri Citigroup Center 153 East 53rd Street New York, New York 10022 Facsimile: (212) 446-4900 E-mail: rcieri@kirkland.com -and-

Response or answer must comply with Rule 8(b), (c) and (e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

2
K&E 11548589.3

Kirkland & Ellis LLP Attn: David L. Eaton Ray C. Schrock Marc J. Carmel 200 East Randolph Drive Chicago, Illinois 60601 Facsimile: (312) 861-2200 E-mail: deaton@kirkland.com rschrock@kirkland.com mcarmel@kirkland.com -andCarson Fischer, P.L.C. Attn: Joseph M. Fischer 4111 West Andover Road West - Second Floor Bloomfield Hills, Michigan 48302 Facsimile: (248) 644-1832 E-mail: jfischer@carsonfischer.com PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE THAT if no responses to the Motion are timely filed and served, the Court may grant the Motion and enter the order without a hearing as set forth in Rule 9014-1 of the Local Rules for the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Michigan.

3
K&E 11548589.3

Dated: December 27, 2006

KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP /s/ Ray C. Schrock Richard M. Cieri (NY RC 6062) Citigroup Center 153 East 53rd Street New York, New York 10022 Telephone: (212) 446-4800 Facsimile: (212) 446-4900 -andDavid L. Eaton (IL 3122303) Ray C. Schrock (IL 6257005) Marc J. Carmel (IL 6272032) 200 East Randolph Drive Chicago, Illinois 60601 Telephone: (312) 861-2000 Facsimile: (312) 861-2200 -andCARSON FISCHER, P.L.C. Joseph M. Fischer (P13452) 4111 West Andover Road West - Second Floor Bloomfield Hills, Michigan 48302 Telephone: (248) 644-4840 Facsimile: (248) 644-1832 Co-Counsel for the Debtors

4
K&E 11548589.3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Ray C. Schrock, an attorney, certify that on the 27th day of December, 2006, I caused to be served, by e-mail, facsimile and overnight delivery, in the manner and to the parties set forth on the attached service lists, a true and correct copy of the foregoing Debtors Seventh Motion for an Order Extending the Debtors Exclusivity Periods to File a Chapter 11 Plan and to Solicit Votes Thereon. Dated: December 27, 2006 /s/ Ray C. Schrock Ray C. Schrock

Served via Electronic Mail

CREDITOR NAME A Freeman Acord Inc Adrian City Hall Alice B Eaton Athens City Tax Collector Basell USA Inc Brendan G Best Bryan Clay Champaign County Collector Chris Kocinski City Of Eunice City Of Evart City Of Kitchener Finance Dept City Of Lowell City Of Marshall City Of Muskegon City Of Port Huron City Of Rialto City Of Rochester Hills City Of Salisbury City Of Westland City Of Woonsocket Ri City Treasurer City Treasurer DaimlerChrysler DaimlerChrysler Daniella Saltz Danielle Kemp David H Freedman David Heller David Youngman Dow Chemical Company DuPont Earle I Erman Erin M Casey Frank Gorman Gail Perry Ge Capital GE Polymerland George E Schulman Gold Lange & Majoros PC Hal Novikoff Heather Sullivan James A Plemmons Jim Clough Joe LaFleur Joe Saad John A Harris John Green John J Dawson John S Sawyer Josef Athanas Joseph Delehant Esq Joseph M Fischer Esq K Crumbo K Schultz Kim Stagg Kimberly Davis Rodriguez Leigh Walzer Levine Fricke Inc M Crosby Macomb Intermediate School Marc J Carmel

CREDITOR NOTICE NAME John Livingston John Fabor Mike Keith Scott Salerni

Barb Neal The Mayor at City Hall Roger Elkins City Manager Pauline Houston Lowell Regional Wastewater Maurice S Evans City Manager Derrick Smith Treasurer's Office City Treasurer Kurt A Dawson City Assesor Treasurer Business License Div Pretreatment Division Tracy Horvarter

Kathleen Maxwell Bruce Tobiansky

Val Venable

Stuart A Gold & Donna J Lehl

EMAIL afreeman@akingump.com jlivingston@acordinc.com cityofadrian@iw.net aeaton@stblaw.com finance@cityofathens.com scott.salerni@basell.com bbest@dykema.com bryan_clay@ham.honda.com bneal@co.champaign.il.us christopher.j.kocinski@bofasecurities.com Eunicela@hotmail.com evartmanager@sbcglobal.net finance@city.kitchener.on.ca MYoung@ci.lowell.ma.us Mevans@cityofmarshall.com derrick.smith@postman.org cphdp@porthuron.org treasurer@rialtoca.gov treasury@rochesterhills.org finwebreq@salisburync.gov finance@ci.westland.mi.us webmaster@woonsocketri.org THovarter@cityofmarshall.com Ncowdrey@corunna-mi.gov kpm3@daimlerchrysler.com krk4@daimlerchrysler.com dsaltz@ford.com danielle.kemp@lw.com dfreedman@ermanteicher.com david.heller@lw.com David.Youngman@ColAik.com klmaxwell@dow.com bruce.d.tobiansky@usa.dupont.com eerman@ermanteicher.com ecasey@stblaw.com fgorman@honigman.com perry.gail@pbgc.com rail.sales@ge.com valerie.venable@ge.com ges@dgdk.com sgold@glmpc.com dlehl@glmpc.com HSNovikoff@wlrk.com hsullivan@unumprovident.com jplemmons@dickinson-wright.com jrc8@daimlerchrysler.com joe_lafleur@ham.honda.com js284477@bloomberg.net jharris@quarles.com greenj@millercanfield.com jdawson@quarles.com jss@sawyerglancy.com josef.athanas@lw.com joseph.delehant@sylvania.com jfischer@carsonfischer.com kcrumbo@kraftscpas.com kschultz@tmmna.com kim.stagg@nmm.nissan-usa.com Kimberly.Rodriguez@gt.com lwalzer@angelogordon.com veronica.fennie@lfr.com mcrosby@akingump.com webmaster@misd.net mcarmel@kirkland.com

In re: Collins & Aikman Corp., et al. Case No. 05-55927 (SWR)

Page 1 of 2

Served via Electronic Mail

CREDITOR NAME Mark Fischer Michael R Paslay Michael Stamer Michigan Department Of Treasury Mike O'Rourke Mike Paslay Ministry Of Finance Corp Tax Branch Missouri Dept Of Revenue Municipalite Du Village De Nick Shah Nina Rosete Paul Hoffman Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation Peter Schmidt Peter V Pantaleo Phh Canada Inc Philip Dublin Phoenix Contracting Company R Aurand R J Sidman Ralph E McDowell Ray C Schrock Rick Feinstein Ricoh Canada Inc Robert J Diehl Jr Robert Weiss Ronald A Leggett Ronald R Rose Sarah Eagle Sean P Corcoran Sheryl Toby Stark County Treasurer State Of Michigan

CREDITOR NOTICE NAME

15663507 Lacolle

Sara Eagle & Gail Perry Sara Eagle & Gail Perry

Tricia Sommers

Collector Of Revenue

State Of Michigan State Of Michigan Stephen E Spence Stephen S LaPlante T Pryce Tax Administrator Thomas Radom Treasurer Of State Tricia Sherick Tyco Capital Inc United Rentals Of Canada Inc Ville De Farnham Voridian Canada Company William C Andrews William G Diehl William J Byrne

PA Powers Michigan Dept Of Environmental Quality Environmental Assistance Div Michigan Dept Of Treasury Collection Div Office of Financial Mgmt Cashiers Office Michigan Unemployment Insurance Agency US Trustee

EMAIL mark.w.fischer@gm.com mpaslay@wallerlaw.com mstamer@akingump.com treasReg@michigan.gov Michael.Orourke@colaik.com mike.paslay@wallerlaw.com info@electionsquebec.qc.ca mied@dor.mo.gov maire@st-zotique.com Nick.Shah@cit.com nina.m.rosete@bofasecurities.com phoffman@bofasecurities.com eagle.sara@pbgc.gov efile@pbgc.gov pschmidt@dykema.com ppantaleo@stblaw.com phhmail@phhpc.com pdublin@akingump.com triciawinkle@hotmail.com raurand@e-bbk.com rjsidman@vssp.com rmcdowell@bodmanllp.com rschrock@kirkland.com rick.feinstein@ubs.com legal@ricoh.ca rdiehl@bodmanllp.com rweiss@honigman.com leggettr@stlouiscity.com rrose@dykema.com eagle.sarah@pbgc.com sean.p.corcoran@delphi.com stoby@dykema.com PAPowers@co.stark.oh.us deq-ead-env-assist@michigan.gov

Jim Cambio Joseph T. Deters

Service de la Tresorerie

treasReg@michigan.gov shuttkimberlyj@michigan.gov steve.e.spence@usdoj.gov laplante@millercanfield.com tpryce@ford.com jcambio@tax.ri.gov radom@butzel.com treasurer@tos.state.oh.us tsherick@honigman.com Frank.Chaffiotte@cit.com e-rental@ur.com msaintdenis@ville.farnham.qc.ca blanderson@eastman.com kandrews@e-bbk.com wdiehl@e-bbk.com bbyrne@e-bbk.com

In re: Collins & Aikman Corp., et al. Case No. 05-55927 (SWR)

Page 2 of 2

Served via Facsimile


(no valid e-mail) CREDITOR NAME American General Finance Bayer Material Sciences BNY Midwest Trust Company BNY Midwest Trust Company Brown Corporation City Of Albemarle City Of Battle Creek City Of Longview City Of Sterling Heights Colbond Inc Dayton Bag & Burlap Co Enerflex Solutions LLC Exxon Chemicals Intertex World Resources Trintex Corp Lake Erie Products Meridian Magnesium Office of Finance of Los Angeles Orlando Corporation Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation Pine River Plastics Inc Progressive Moulded Products Revenue Canada Riverfront Plastic Products Inc Select Industries Corp South Carolina Dept Of Revenue Southco Standard Federal Bank State Of Michigan Teknor Financial Corporation TG North America Town Of Lincoln Finance Office Unique Fabricating Inc Valiant Tool & Mold Inc Vericorr Packaging fka CorrFlex Packaging CREDITOR NOTICE NAME Linda Vesci Mary Callahan Roxane Ellwalleger Mark Ferderber Utilities Department Income Tax Division Water Utilities James P Bulhinger City Treasurer Don Brown Jeff Rutter Todd McCallum Law Dept Bill Weeks Lilia Roman Bankruptcy Auditor Sara Eagle & Gail Perry Barb Krzywiecki Dan Thiffault George Tabry Christine Brown Sales & Use Tax Division Lorraine Zinar Holly Matthews Linda King Bruce B Galletly Raymond Soucie Tom Tekieke General Fax Adriana Avila FAX 217-356-5469 412-777-4736 312-827-8542 312-827-8542 616-527-3385 704-984-9445 269-966-3629 903-237-1004 586-276-4077 828-665-5005 937-258-0029 248-430-0134 281-588-4606 770-258-3901 630-595-0336 517-663-2714 213-368-7076 905-677-1851 202-326-4112 810-329-9388 905-760-3371 902-432-6287 734-281-4483 937-233-7640 803-898-5147 610-361-6082 248-816-4376 517-241-8077 401-725-5160 248-280-2110 401-333-3648 248-853-8422 519-944-7748 586-939-4216

In re: Collins & Aikman Corp., et al. Case No. 05-55927 (SWR)

Page 1 of 1

Served via Overnight Mail

CREDITOR NAME Advanced Composites Inc Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP Assoc Receivables Funding Inc Athens City Tax Collector Basf Corporation Butzel Long PC Canada Customs & Rev Agency Canada Customs & Rev Agency Charter Township Of Plymouth City Of Barberton City Of Canton City Of Dover City Of Dover City Of Evart Recreation Dept City Of Fullerton City Of Havre De Grace City Of Los Angeles City Of Phoenix City Of Roxboro City Of St Joseph City Of Williamston City Treasurer Collector Of Revenue Collins & Aikman Corp DuPont Dykema Gossett PLLC ER Wagner Manufacturing Fisher Automotive Systems Fisher America Inc Freudenberg Nok Inc Ga Dept Of Revenue Gaston County Ge Capital Ge Capital Ge Capital Ge Capital Comm Serv Astro Dye Harford County Revenue Highwoods Forsyth Lp Highwoods Forsyth Lp Hnk Michigan Properties Indiana Department Of Revenue Indiana Dept Of Revenue Industrial Development Board Industrial Leasing Company Industrial Truck Sales & Svc Inmet Division of Multimatic Internal Revenue Service

CREDITOR NOTICE NAME Rob Morgan Michael S Stamer Philip C Dublin Mike Keith Charlie Burrill Thomas B Radom Attn Receiver General International Tax Service Income Tax Division Canton Income Tax Dept Wastewater Labroratory

Mary Ellen Hinckle Dept Of Building And Safety City Attorneys Office Tax Department Water Department Port Huron Police Department Barbara J Walker Stacy Fox Susan F Herr Ronald Rose & Brendan Best Gary Torke William Stiefel

ADDRESS1 1062 S 4th Ave 590 Madison Ave PO Box 16253 PO Box 849 1609 Biddle Ave 100 Bloomfield Hills Pkwy Ste 100 1 5 Notre Ave 2204 Walkley Rd PO Box 8040 104 3rd St NW PO Box 9951 484 Middle Rd PO Box 818 200 South Main St 303 W Commonwealth Ave 711 Pennington Ave 201 N Figueroa St No 786 200 W Washington St 13th Fl PO Box 128 700 BRd St 161 E Grand River 100 Mcmorran 201 N Second St 26553 Evergreen Rd DuPont Legal D 7156 400 Renaissance Center 4611 North 32nd St 1084 Doris Rd 47690 E Anchor Ct PO Box 105499 PO Box 890691 PO Box 740434 PO Box 640387 PO Box 642444 PO Box 60500 220 South Main St Attn Lease Administration Attn Lease Administration 7255 Crossleigh Court Ste 108 100 N Senate Ave PO Box 7218 PO Box 4660 PO Box 1803 PO Box 1807 35 West Milmot St Box 330500 Stop 15

ADDRESS2

File 54563

Ste 900 1007 N Market St

CITY Sidney New York Greenville Athens Wyandotte Bloomfield Hills Sudbury Ottawa Plymouth Barberton Canton Dover Dover Evart Fullerton Havre De Grace Los Angeles Phoenix Roxboro St Joseph Williamston Port Huron St Charles Southfield Wilmington Detroit Milwaukee Auburn Hills Plymouth Atlanta Charlotte Atlanta Pittsburgh Pittsburgh Charlotte Bel Air

STATE OH NY SC TN MI MI ON ON MI OH OH NH NH MI CA MD CA AZ NC MI MI MI MO MI DE MI WI MI MI GA NC GA PA PA NC MD TN NC OH IN IN AL MI NC ON MI

ZIP 45365-8977 10022 29606 37371-0849 48192 48304 P3A 5C2 K1A 1B1 48170-4394 44203 44711-9951 03820 03820-0818 49631 92632 21078 90012 85003 27573 49085-1355 48895 48060 63301 48076 19898 48243 53209-6023 48326-2613 48170 30348-5499 28289-0691 30374 15264-0387 15264 28260 21014 37203-5223 27604 43617 46204-2253 46207-7218 36103-4660 49501 27702-1807 L4B 1L7 48232

COUNTRY

Canada Canada

Director's Office for Taxpayer Services Division

co Highwoods Properties Llc co Highwoods Properties Llc co Rudolph libbe Properties

of the City of Montgomery

SBSE Insolvency Unit

2120 West End Ave Ste 100 Nashville 3100 Smoketree Ct Ste 600 Raleigh Toledo Indianapolis Indianapolis Montgomery Grand Rapids Durham Richmond Hill Detroit

Canada

In re: Collins & Aikman Corp., et al. Case No. 05-55927 (SWR)

Page 1 of 3

Served via Overnight Mail

CREDITOR NAME Invista ISP Elastomer Janesville Products Keith Milligan Lear Corp Manpower Meridian Park Ministre Du Revenu Du Quebec Municipality Of Port Hope North Loop Partners Ltd PolyOne Corp Prestige Property Tax Special Princeton Properties Qrs 14 Paying Agent Qrs 14 Paying Agent Inc Railroad Drive Lp Receiver General For Canada Receiver General For Canada Receiver General for Canada Receiver General For Canada Revenue Canada Securities and Exchange Commission Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP State Of Alabama State Of Michigan State Of Michigan State Of Michigan State Of Michigan State of Michigan State of Michigan Central Functions Unit Stephen E Spence Summit Property Management Inc Tate Boulevard I Llc Tax Collector Tcs Realty Ltd The Corporation Of The Town The Town Of Pageland Tom Heck Truck Service Town Of Farmington Town Of Farmville Town Of Gananoque Town Of Old Fort Town Of Pageland Town Of Troy Tr Associates Treasurer City Of Detroit Unifi Inc Uniform Color Co

CREDITOR NOTICE NAME Tim Gorman Laura Kelly

C Garland Waller

co Beer Wells Real Estate Woody Ban

ADDRESS1 601 S LA Salle St Ste 310 PO Box 4346 2700 Patterson Ave 3745 C Us Hwy 80 W 21557 Telegraph Rd 30800 Northwestern Hwy 2707 Meridian Dr 3800 Marly PO Box 117 PO Box 3449 33587 Walker Rd 1025 King St East 678 Princeton Blvd Church St Station 50 Rockefeller Lobby 2 100 Vesper Executive Pk

ADDRESS2

PO Box 6529

CITY Chicago Houston Grand Rapids Phenix Southfield Farmington Hills Greenville Ste Foy Port Hope Longview Avon Lake Cambridge Lowell New York New York Tyngsboro Ottawa Ottawa Dorval Belleville Ottawa Chicago New York Montgomery Lansing Lansing Detroit Lansing Lansing Lansing Detroit Southfield Hickory Fresno Trenton Ingersoll Pageland Urbana Farmington Farmville Gananoque Old Fort Pageland Troy Troy Detroit Greensboro Holland

STATE IL TX MI AL MI MI NC QC ON TX OH ON MA NY NY MA ON ON QC ON ON IL NY AL MI MI MI MI MI MI MI MI NC CA ON ON SC IL NH NC ON NC SC NC MI MI NC MI

ZIP 60605-1725 77210 49546 36870 48034 48334 27834 G1X 4A5 L1A 3V9 75606 44012 N3H 3P5 01851 10249 10020-1605 01879-2710 K1A 1B1 K1P 6K1 H4Y 1G7 K8N 2S3 K1A 9Z9 60604 10017-3954 36104 48909 48909 48277-0833 48909 48918-0001 48909-8244 48226 48075 28602 937151192 K8V 5R1 N5C 2V5 29728 61802 03835 27828-1621 K7G 2T6 28762 29728 27371 48083 48232 27410-6237 49423

COUNTRY

Canada Canada

Canada

Canada Customs & Rev Agency Technology Ctr 875 Heron Rd Industry Canada Als Financial Postal Station D Box 2330 700 Leigh Capreol 11 Station St Ottawa Technology Centre Midwest Regional Office 175 W Jackson Blvd Ste 900 Peter Pantaleo Erin Casey & Alice Eaton 425 Lexington Ave Department Of Revenue Dept Of Commerce & Nat Res PO Box 30004 Matthew Rick Asst Attorney General PO Box 30754 State Of Michigan Mc Dept 77833 State Secondary Complex 7150 Harris Dr PO Box 30015 430 W Allegan St Jennifer Nelles US Trustee First Plaza County Of Fresno Of Ingersoll Office of Child Support 211 W Fort St Ste 700 24901 Northwestern Hwy 302 1985 Blvd Se PO Box 1192 21 Albert St 130 Oxford St 2nd Fl 126 North Pearl St 1306 E Triumph Dr 356 Main St 115 West Church St 30 King St East PO Box 520 PO Box 67 315 North Main St 200 E Big Beaver PO Box 33525 7201 W Friendly Ave 942 Brooks Ave

875 Heron Rd

Canada Canada Canada Canada Canada

50 N Ripley St

PO Box 30744

PO Box 2228

Canada Canada

PO Box 67

Farmville Downtown Partnership

PO Box 100

Canada

Fsia Inc

Randy Lueth

In re: Collins & Aikman Corp., et al. Case No. 05-55927 (SWR)

Page 2 of 3

Served via Overnight Mail

CREDITOR NAME United States Attorney for the Eastern District of Michigan Valeo Inc Vari Form Inc Vespera Lowell Llc Village Of Holmesville Village Of Rantoul Visteon Climate Control W9 Lws Real Estate Limited Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz Wellington Green LLC

CREDITOR NOTICE NAME Attn Civil Division Jerry Dittrich Terry Nardone Blue Point Capital Bpv Lowell LLC

ADDRESS1 211 W Fort St Ste 2001 3000 University Dr 12341 E 9 Mile Rd 10 Livingston Pl 2nd Fl 205 Millersburg Rd 333 S Tanner One Village Center Dr

ADDRESS2

CITY

STATE MI MI MI CT OH IL MI NC NY MI

ZIP 48226 48326-2356 48089 06830 44633 61866 48111 28262-2337 10019 48025

COUNTRY

Detroit Auburn Hills Warren Greenwichn PO Box 113 Holmesville Rantoul Van Buren Ste PO RFQ Office Township Charlotte New York Bingham Farms

co Lincoln Harris Llc Hal Novikoff

10101 Claude Freeman Dr Ste 200 N 51 W 52nd St 31100 Telegraph Rd Ste 200

In re: Collins & Aikman Corp., et al. Case No. 05-55927 (SWR)

Page 3 of 3