Professional Documents
Culture Documents
\
|
=
r
b
D A
E
M
where E b D A n , , , , , , , ,
0
&
be the effective strain rate, effective stress, the stress
exponent, threshold stress, a constant, lattice diffusivity, the sub grain size, the magnitude of
burgers vector, Youngs modulus. The values of creep parameters mand
0
are described
by the following regression equations as a function of particle size, temperature and volume
percent, which extracted from the available experimental results of Pandey et al.[6].
622 . 0 98 . 4 2077 . 0 38 . 35
= V T P e m and 11916 . 2 00536 . 1 01057 . 0 03507 . 0
0
+ + = V T P
Taking reference frame along the principal directions of , r and z , the generalized
constitutive equations for an anisotropic disc under multiaxial stress condition are given as,
{ }
z r r
G H H G
+ = ) (
2
&
&
(4) and
{ }
r z
H F F H
+ = ) (
2
&
&
(5)
{ }
F G G F
r z z
+ = ) (
2
&
&
(6)
where F, G and H are anisotropic constants of the material
r
& ,
& ,
z
& and ,
r
,
z
are the
strain rates and the stresses respectively in the direction , r and z .
&
be the effective strain
rate, be the effective stress. For biaxial state of stress ) , (
r
the effective stress is,
( )
( ) { }
2 / 1
2 2 2
1
)
`
+ +
+
=
r r
H G F
H G
(7)
Using Eqs.(3)and(7), Eq.(4) can be rewritten as,
( ) [ ]
2 / 1
2
8
0
1 2 1 2
1 1 ) (
\
|
+ + |
\
|
+
+ |
\
|
+ +
= =
H
F
x x
H
G
M
f f
x
H
G
G F H
r d
u d
t c
r
r
&
&
(8) where,
r
r x = ) (
Similarly from Eq.(5),
dr r h I dr r h I
b
a
r
a
= =
2
0
2
,
International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology (IJMET), ISSN 0976
6340(Print), ISSN 0976 6359(Online) Volume 3, Issue 2, May-August (2012), IAEME
277
[ ]
2 / 1
2
8
0
1 2 1 2
( 1 ) (
\
|
+ + |
\
|
+
+ |
\
|
+ +
= =
H
F
x x
H
G
M
f f
x
H
F
G F H
r
u
t c
r
&
&
(9) and ) (
t c
t c
f f
F
x H
F
H
f f
F
H
x
F
H
F
G
r
+ |
\
|
+
+ |
\
|
+
=
1
) (
(11)
The equation of equilibrium for a rotating disc with varying thickness can be written as,
( ) 0
2 2
= + h r h h r
dr
d
r
(12)
Integrating Eq.(12) within limits a to b and using Eqs.(1) and (2),
0
2
0
1
I
A
avg
=
(13)
Using Eq.(8) and (9), Eq.(12) becomes,
) (
). (
. ) ( ) (
2
1
2 0
2
1
r
hdr r
hdr r I r
b
a
b
a
(14)
where,
2 / 1
2
1
1 2
) (
) (
)
`
\
|
+ + |
\
|
+
|
|
\
|
+
=
F
H
x
F
H
x
F
H
F
G
H G
F
r
r
(15) and
2 / 1
2
0
2
1 2
) (
)
`
\
|
+ + |
\
|
+
|
|
\
|
+
=
F
H
x
F
H
x
F
H
F
G
H G
F
r
(16)
1/8
1/2
r
a
2
r
(r)dr
exp.
F
H
F
H
1 H) F(G
F
H
1
F
2H
F
G
F
H
.
2
(r)
+ |
\
|
+ +
\
|
+ + |
\
|
+
=
t c
f f
x
x
x
r
(17)
Integrating Eq.(12) within limits a to r and use Eq.(1),
I dr h
h r
r
a
r
2
.
.
1
(18)
Thus the tangential stress
& and
z
& calculated from Eqs.(4), (5) and (6).
Tensile strength and Hill anisotropy constants
When a sample disc material is tested under uniaxial loading in the r and
direction, the
corresponding stress invariant may be written in term of the observed tensile strengths and
the Hill anisotropy constants as given below:
ry i
H G
2
+
=
(23) and
y i
H F
2
+
= (24)
where
i
is the isotropic yield stress for which 1 = = = F H H G G F
International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology (IJMET), ISSN 0976
6340(Print), ISSN 0976 6359(Online) Volume 3, Issue 2, May-August (2012), IAEME
278
When the sample is tested under uniaxial loading in the direction, the stress invariant may be
written similarly as
zy i
G F
2
+
=
(25)
where
ry
,
y
and
zy
are the yield stresses in the r , and z directions respectively.
Following Hill (1948), the anisotropy constants can be written in terms of these yield stresses
as
2
2 2 2
1 1 1
i
ry zy y
F
|
|
\
|
+ =
,
2
2 2 2
1 1 1
i
y ry zy
G
|
|
\
|
+ =
and
2
2 2 2
1 1 1
i
zy y ry
H
|
|
\
|
+ =
For simplicity one may assume that the same isotropic yield stresses are observed in r and z
directions and one may put
i zy ry
= = in Eqs. (23) and (25) to have 1 = G F
One may assume that a small anisotropy exists in the disc due to processing which is
reflected in the difference in strengths circumferential and radial directions as characterized
by the ratio of their respective yield strengths,
, as given below
=
y ry
From Eqs. (23) and (24)
1
2
1
1
+
=
+
+
=
H G H G
H F
or 1
2
2
=
H
G
The isotropic material corresponds to 1 = and the effect of a deviation of
from one on the
resulting stress and creep will be investigated in the present study.
3. SOLUTION PROCEDURE
The stress distribution is evaluated from the above analysis by iterative numerical scheme of
computation. In the first iteration, it is assumed that
avg
= over the entire disc radii.
Substituting
avg
for
which
can be substituted in Eq. (11) to calculate first approximation of ) (r i.e. . )] ( [
1
r Now one
carries out the numerical integration of [ ]
1
) (r from limits of a to r and uses this value in
Eq.(17) to obtain first approximation of ) (r i.e. [ ]
1
) (r Using this [ ]
1
) (r , in Eq. (15) and
(16) respectively,
1 1
)] ( [ r are found, which are used in Eq. (14) to find second approximation
of
i.e.
2
] [
. Using
2
] [
for
)
=0.7
(
)
=1.0
(
)
=1.3
(
)
=1.0
Legends:
Figure1 Variation of tangential Stress along the radial distance of the isotropic/anisotropic
discs rotating with an angular velocity 15000 rpm at 623K.
Radial Distance (mm)
20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160
R
a
d
i
a
l
S
t
r
e
s
s
(
M
P
a
)
0
4
8
12
16
20
24
28
32
= 1.3
Linearly Varying Thickness
= 0.7
= 1
Legends:
Figure2 Variation of radial Stress along the radial distance of the isotropic/anisotropic discs
rotating over an angular velocity 15000 rpm at 623K.
International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology (IJMET), ISSN 0976
6340(Print), ISSN 0976 6359(Online) Volume 3, Issue 2, May-August (2012), IAEME
281
Radial Distance(mm)
20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160
T
a
n
g
e
n
t
i
a
l
S
t
r
a
i
n
R
a
t
e
(
s
-
1
)
1e-14
1e-13
1e-12
1e-11
1e-10
1e-9
1e-8
1e-7
1e-6
1e-5
1e-4
Legends:
Linearly Varying Thickness
= 1
= 0.7
= 1.3
Figure3 Variation of tangential strain rate along the radial distance of the
isotropic/anisotropic discs rotating with an angular velocity 15000 rpm at 623K.
In figure 2, the variation of radial stress along the radius in the anisotropic disc ( 7 . 0 = and
3 . 1 = ) have been investigated and the results are compared with an isotropic disc ( 0 . 1 = ).
If is less than unity, the radial stress enhance in the region near inner radius of the disc in
comparison to that in isotropic case, but reduce near the outer radius of disc. If is greater
than unity, the radial stress reduce in the region near inner radius of the disc in comparison to
that in isotropic case, but enhance near the outer radius of disc. However, the magnitude of
this change in tangential and radial stress is only a few percent. Therefore, it is concluded
that stress distribution may not change significantly due to anisotropy introduced by
processing or inhomogeneous distribution of reinforcement.
In figure3, the variation of tangential strain rates along the radius in the anisotropic disc (
7 . 0 = and 3 . 1 = ) have been investigated and the results are compared with an isotropic
disc ( 0 . 1 = ).The tangential strain rate is maximum for greater than unity and minimum
for less than unity in comparison to that in isotropic case ( 0 . 1 = ). However, the trend of
variation of tensile strain rate in tangential direction remains the same although the
magnitude reduces by seven order of magnitude, if is reduced from 1.3 to 0.7 i.e., the
strength in tangential direction is enhanced.
International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology (IJMET), ISSN 0976
6340(Print), ISSN 0976 6359(Online) Volume 3, Issue 2, May-August (2012), IAEME
282
20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160
R
a
d
i
a
l
S
t
r
a
i
n
R
a
t
e
(
s
-
1
)
-1.5e-9
-1.3e-9
-1.0e-9
-7.5e-10
-5.0e-10
-2.5e-10
0.0e+0
2.5e-10
5.0e-10
7.5e-10
1.0e-9
Radial Distance (mm)
20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160
-1.8e-7
-1.5e-7
-1.3e-7
-1.0e-7
-7.5e-8
-5.0e-8
-2.5e-8
0.0e+0
20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160
-5.0e-14
-2.5e-14
0.0e+0
2.5e-14
5.0e-14
7.5e-14
1.0e-13
Linearly Varying Thickness
= 1
Legends:
Linearly Varying Thickness
= 1.3
Legends:
Linearly Varying Thickness
= 0.7
Legends:
Figure 4 Variation of radial strain rate along the radial distance of the isotropic/anisotropic
discs rotating over an angular velocity 15000 rpm at 623K.
In figure 4, the variation of tangential strain rates along the radius in the anisotropic disc (
7 . 0 = and 3 . 1 = ) have been investigated and the results are compared with an isotropic
disc ( 0 . 1 = ). It is observed that the radial strain rate which always remained compressive
for the case where is greater than unity and is equal to unity, becomes tensile in the
middle region of the disc when is less than unity. This is the consequence of the change in
sign of ) (r as given in eq. (11) and this is responsible of the resulting tensile radial strain
rate as given by eq. (8). This change in strain distribution due to the anisotropy in the disc
with varying thickness may cause unwanted deformation in shape.
5. CONCLUSION
The above results and discussion concludes that
1. The anisotropy of material helps in restraining the creep in the rotating disc with thermal
residual stress.
International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology (IJMET), ISSN 0976
6340(Print), ISSN 0976 6359(Online) Volume 3, Issue 2, May-August (2012), IAEME
283
2. In case of anisotropy lowering the strength in tangential direction ) 1 ( < , the tangential stress
reduces in middle region of disc with linearly varying thickness, but enhances near the inner
and outer region of the disc in comparison to that in isotropic disc.
3. If is less than unity, In presence of residual stress the radial stress increases near the inner
region, while it decreases near the outer region of the disc in comparison to those for isotropic
composite.
4. The trend of variation of tensile strain rate in tangential direction remains the same by
reducing afrom 1.3 to 0.7, but the magnitude is reduced by about seven orders of magnitude.
5. The radial strain rate which always remained compressive for greater than unity ) 3 . 1 ( =
and for the isotropic case ) 1 ( = , becomes tensile in the middle region of the disc for a
is less
than unity ) 7 . 0 ( = .
6. The anisotropy introduces significant change in the strain rates, but its effect on the stresses
distribution may be relatively small.
7. In presence of thermal residual stress, the material with anisotropy parameter ) 1 ( < seems
justified for the safe design of the disc with linearly varying thickness as in this case stress
and strain rate are lowest among all the cases for ) 3 . 1 ( =
and ) 7 . 0 ( = .
REFERENCES
[1]. O.D. Sherby, R.H. Klundt and A.K.Miller, Flow stress, subgrain size and subgrain stability at
elevated temperature, Metallurgical Transactions 8A, 1977, 843-850.
[2]. V.K. Arya, and N.S. Bhatnagar, Creep analysis of rotating orthotropic disc. Nuclear
Engineering and Design 55, 1979, 323.
[3]. Arsenault and M. Taya, Thermal Residual Stress in Metal Matrix Composites, Acta
Metallurgica 35, 1987, 651-659.
[4]. R.S. Mishra and A.B. Pandey, Some observations on the high-temperature creep behaviour of
6061 Al-SiC composites, Metallurgical Transactions 21A(7), 1990, 2089-2090.
[5]. H. Jahed, and R. Shirazi, Loading and unloading behavior of a thermoplastic disc, Internal
Pressure Vessel and Piping 78, 2001, 637-645.
[6]. S.B. Singh and S. Ray, Newly Proposed Yield Criterion for Residual Stress and Steady State
Creep in an anisotropic composite rotating disc, Journal of Materials Processing Technology,
143-144, 2003, 623-628.
[7]. V.K. Gupta, S.B. Singh, H.N. Chandrawat and S. Ray, Steady state creep and material
parameters in a rotating disc of Al-SiCp composite, European Journal of Mechanics A/Solids
23, 2004, 335-344.
[8]. C. Baykara, A comparison of stress concentrations in thin sheetswith plastic anisotropy,
Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites 26, 2007, 1455-1459.
[9]. S.B. Singh, One parameter model for creep in a whisker reinforced anisotropic rotating disc
of Al-SiCw composite, European Journal of Mechanics A/Solids 27(4), 2008, 680-690.
[10]. S.B. Singh and M. Rattan, Creep analysis of an isotropic rotating disc in the presence of
thermal residual stress, Journal of Thermoplastic Composite Materials 23, 2010, 299-312.
[11]. Vandana and S.B. Singh. Modeling Anisotropy and steady state creep in a rotating disc of Al-
SiCp having varying thickness, International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research
2(10), 2011, 1-12.