Professional Documents
Culture Documents
MARK BROWN
markbrown@suntimes.com
Breach of Boyles duty to protect the public by committing these acts of arson does not automatically trigger disqualification for a pension, she continued. Instead, what tripped up Boyle were some of the specific methods he used in setting fires, such as igniting materials in Dumpsters and garbage cans that he had placed next to the building structures he intended to torch. In this manner, the fire would spread or communicate, as Boyle put it using fire lingo. Boyle testified in a hearing before the retirement board that he was aware these are methods commonly used by arsonists. Boyles lawyer had argued that the acts of arson for which he was convicted could have been committed by literally anyone and indeed there was no particular level of sophistication from what I could see. Happily, though, the appellate justices saw enough of what they called a nexus between Boyles experience as a firefighter and his firesetting to save the taxpayers the aggravation of financing the retirement of an arsonist. It all comes down to that statutory language about being convicted of a felony relating to or arising out of or in connection with his service as a fireman. Some of you will recognize this as the same legal language in question in the fight over whether former Chicago Police Cmdr. Jon Burge should be allowed to keep his pension following his federal conviction for lying about police torture. The police retirement board ruled Burge could continue drawing his pension, a determination that Illinois Attorney General Lisa Madigan has since gone to court to overturn. It was not immediately clear what effect, if any, the Boyle ruling will have on the Burge pension case, although Burge supporters had previously cited Boyle getting his pension as one reason Burge was entitled to his. Id argue there was a definite nexus between Burges work as a police detective and his lying under oath about police torture.
It all comes down to that statutory language about being convicted of a felony relating to or arising out of or in connection with his service as a fireman.
In an about-face, the Illinois State Police wont investigate the 2004 homicide case that involved Richard J. R.J. Vanecko, a nephew of Mayor Daley and White House Chief of Staff William Daley. The State Police had agreed to review the matter on March 25, acting on a request the day before from Cook County States Attorney Anita Alvarez, who said she wanted an independent police agency to investigate the death of David Koschman and the way the Chicago Police Department handled the case. But, on Monday, State Police interim director Patrick Keen called Alvarez Chief of Staff Dan Kirk and said the State Police are unwilling to accept the investigation, Alvarez spokeswoman Sally Daly said. We are surprised and disappointed by their decision, Daly said. Its unclear why theyve changed course. The states attorney remains committed to an independent investigation of this case. A State Police spokesman declined to comment Monday night. Alvarez called for the State Police to get involved because witnesses now say that detectives who originally investigated the case wrongly portrayed the 5-foot-5, 140-pound Koschman as the aggressor when he was punched by the 6-foot-3, 230-pound Vanecko during a drunken confrontation on Division Street on
David Koschman
April 25, 2004. She said her office cant examine the police investigation because her staff has been involved from the start, determining in 2004 there wasnt enough evidence to charge Vanecko. Days before Alvarez sought the State Police investigation, City of Chicago Inspector General Joseph Ferguson had begun a separate probe of Koschmans death and the way police handled it. The day after Alvarez asked the State Police to investigate, her chief deputy, Hiram Grau, was appointed State Police director, effective April 11. Grau had been a Chicago Police deputy superintendent who supervised detectives at the time Koschman died. The State Police said at that time that Grau would not participate in the Koschman probe because of his roles with Alvarezs office and the Chicago Police. While he was not personally involved in CPDs investigation of the 2004 incident, out of an abundance of caution, Mr. Grau will be recusing himself. The Chicago Police dropped its initial investigation shortly after Koschmans death and then formally closed the case March 1, after a new review of the evidence. They concluded Vanecko acted in self-defense when he punched Koschman in the face and sent him reeling backward to the street, leading to a brain injury that proved fatal 11 days later.