Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Rating Date CMP Price Target Upside HOLD 10 May 2012 INR 661 INR 731 +11%
INVESTMENT ANALYSIS
Sustained growth in Utility Vehicles (UV) We believe M&M will consolidate its leadership position in the UV industry (56% market share). We expect UV volumes to grow at 20% CAGR in the period FY12-14E, in line with the industry, largely driven by the recent success of its high end offering XUV 500 and likely new launch of a mini Xylo in the current year
COMPANY DATA Industry Equity (INR mn) Face Value KEY MARKET DATA BSE Code BSE Group NSE Code Bloomberg Code Mkt Cap. (INR Bn.) 52 Week high/low Monthly Avg Turnover 500520 A M&M MM 406 875 / 616 85 Mn Auto 2936 5
Tractor slowdown to prevail through FY13E Following strong growth of 28%/24%/19% in FY10/FY11/H1FY12, we expect the sharp deceleration in tractor sales witnessed in H2FY12 to continue during the course of FY13E driven by a) b) c) d) Slower increase in farmers income owing to lower increase in MSPs Slower increase in (a) Labor costs and (b) Non-availability of labor; owing to a slowdown in MGNREGA expenditure Declining agri-credit and likely rise in NPAs Slower economic activity coupled with a high volume base
Margin pressures to persist We believe that slowing tractor demand will have a cascading impact on margins as capacity utilization levels begin to recede and reduce the operating leverage advantages enjoyed in FY10/11. The standalone auto segment especially on the LCV front is facing intense competition which is leading to softening of margins. The entry of Ashok Leyland in the LCV segment with Dost has further increased competition and could lower pricing power of incumbents like M&M Valuations We expect M&M to witness earnings growth of 10% CAGR over FY12-14E given strong traction for the recently launched XUV 500, to be launched compact SUV and a recovery in tractor demand in FY14E. We value the company on SOTP basis at INR 731 comprising of INR 583 for the standalone business (valued at 10.4x FY14E EPS of INR 56) and INR 148 for subsidiaries
PRICE PERFORMANCE Returns (%) 3 Month 6 Month 12 Month * Benchmark Abs -3 -18 -2 Rel.* 1 -14 7 Sensex
Analyst Contact No
Email ID jehan-bhadha@darashaw.com
Summary Financials (Standalone) INR Mn. FY10 FY11 FY12E FY13E FY14E
EPS 34 43 47 43 56
CONTENTS
Pg
Business Overview Tractors Utility Vehicles CVs, Three Wheelers, Two Wheelers, PVs Acquisitions based on strategic and economic rationale New model launches CAPEX Tractors pain to negate Autos gain & Standalone Assumptions Valuations Darashaw vs Consensus Financials
3 4 16 18 23 25 25 26 27 28 29
1001-Regent Chambers, Nariman Point, Mumbai
Business Overview
Mahindra & Mahindra (M&M) is the flagship company of the Mahindra Group. It has two main operating divisions, autos and farm equipment. Autos include utility vehicles, light commercial vehicles and three-wheelers, and farm equipment includes tractors and agricultural implements. The company also has investments in standalone entities operating in the areas of hospitality, trade & financial services, auto components, IT and telecom.
TRACTORS
UTILITY VEHICLES
M & M
Others 13%
UNDISPUTED LEADERSHIP
M&M 40%
TAMO 12%
M&M 56%
B U S I N E S S S N A P S H O T
Toyota 18%
TAFE 23%
Market share of 31%; observed volume growth of 25% CAGR over the past 5 years, as against industry growth of 20% In JV with Navistar for manufacture of higher tonnage trucks Market share at 13% from 10% in FY10 Market share of 6% in the scooters since its entry in FY10; Restructuring underway for motorcycles Focusing on mid-size segment
Cost INR Mn
RECENT ACQUISITIONS
40% volume growth in CY11; access to technology and products for Indian and Global markets Access to electric vehicle technology Entry into fast growing micro irrigation industry
I.T 9%
Source: Company
1001-Regent Chambers, Nariman Point, Mumbai
Source: Company
Classification on Horse Power basis 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% FY00 FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 26% 23% 22% 22% 23% 20% 18% 17% 15% 15% FY09 16% FY10 55% 55% 53% 55% 50% 4% 15% 7% 15% 7% 17% 5% 18% 7% 21% 8% 21% 8% 24% 8% 26% 11% 27% 15% 25% 14% 24% 16% 28% 17% 28%
51%
51%
49%
46%
46%
46%
42%
41%
14% FY11
14% FY12
Source: CMIE
To continue Lending expected to be subdued as NPAs continue to rise Incremental growth in expenditure and man days will be minimal
MGNREGA
Contrary to peoples perception, tractor sales have not had a strong historical correlation with monsoon. The proportion of Indias arable land under irrigation improved to 45.3% in FY09 from 40.5% in FY04. The government expects average annual irrigation spending to be INR 492 bn during the XIth Plan period (2007-12), up from INR 213 bn during the Xth Plan period (2002-07), which should further improve the irrigation intensity in India. Rising irrigation intensity is a positive for tractor demand as it improves a farmers visibility and confidence on crop output and reduces dependence on rainfall.
Rainfall (% of Normal)
Tractor Growth
FY95 FY96 FY97 FY98 FY99 FY00 FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10
% of Area Irrigated
45%
40%
35%
30%
25% FY91 FY92 FY93 FY94 FY95 FY96 FY97 FY98 FY99 FY00 FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09
Farmers income is dependent primarily on the increase in MSPs of crops. Between FY97-08, the average increase in MSPs stood at a mere 5% which translated into subdued increase in farmers incomes. However since FY09, the MSPs have been rising at a CAGR of 17% which has resulted in a substantial increase in their incomes.
Indexed Growth in MSP of major crops 35% Average growth in MSP at 17% between 2009-12
25%
15%
5% FY97 FY98 FY99 FY00 FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12
-5%
MSP of various crops INR / Qtl Paddy Wheat Jowar Bajra/Maize Sugarcane FY06 585 700 525 525 115 FY12 1185 1285 990 980 240 Change 103% 84% 89% 87% 109%
1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 FY00 FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12
Paddy (F)
Wheat
Jowar
However moving ahead, we do not believe that the increase in MSPs will be of the magnitude witnessed over the past four years (CAGR of 17% between FY09-12). We thus expect modest increases in MSPs to dampen tractor demand in the coming years.
Indias penetration level at 19 tractors per 1,000 hectare appears reasonable vis--vis the global average of 21. There are countries having much higher as well as lower penetration levels than India.
Tractors / 1,000 Ha 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 28 27 26 19 43 64 64
World Avg
13
10
Brazil
Mexico
Argentina
Germany
The average per capita operational size of land holding in India is 1.33 ha per person, which is far below the world average of 3.70. Further, land holdings have shown a marginal decrease from the holding size of that of a decade ago (1.41 ha). Over 80% of the land holdings in India are classified as small and marginal land holdings with the farm size of less than 2 ha which makes the use of tractors unviable. The industry is trying to address this issue by focusing on low Horse Power tractors (<20 HP). M&Ms management believes that products such as Yuvraj are garnering good response from smaller famers.
Tractor Industry penetration is yet low Area (hectare) Large Farmers Medium Farmers Small Farmers >8 28 <2 Farmland Mix 1% 17% 82% Tractor penetration 38% 18% 1% Source: Company
Australia
France
Uruguay
China
Chile
India
USA
As we have highlighted in the past, growth in agricultural credit has slipped sharply in the past few months.
Tractor Growth 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% -5% -10% -15%
Tractor Growth
16%
10%
Mar-11
May-11
Dec-10
Dec-11
Sep-11
Apr-11
Feb-11
Aug-11
Nov-10
Nov-11
Source: RBI Nearly 44% of incremental NPAs in FY11 were created in the agri sector whereas the sector formed just 13% of the overall gross credit. Anecdotal evidence suggests a considerable deterioration in credit culture post the loan waiver scheme implemented in early 2009. We argue that easy credit availability (assumed so in anticipation of more such waivers) was in part responsible for the boom in tractor sales in the last couple of years. Farm loan NPAs account for 19% of State Bank of Indias (SBI) total NPAs. The countrys largest lender, which reported INR 40,098 crore of bad loans in its books as on December 31, 2011 said the ratio of its gross NPAs in farm lending to gross advances stood at 9.45%, while the overall gross NPA ratio stood at 4.61%. We expect the current slowdown witnessed in agri credit offtake to prevail over the coming year as banks try to minimize their advances from turning into bad debts.
Feb-12
Oct-11
Jan-11
Jan-12
Jun-11
Jul-11
4%
Since its introduction in FY06, MGNREGA has been gradually impacting the labor availability and wages for farming activities. Our interaction with farmers and agri based companies confirms with this belief. We are consequently witnessing that farmers are increasingly using tractors to substitute labor given the higher wage inflation as well as the growing scarcity of labor. However we believe that while absolute spends could remain intact (given the political environment), it has already affected the growth momentum of tractor sales. In fact, we observe that MGNREGA spends and person days in the current year have actually declined
Total Expenditure (in Mn) 400000 300000 200000 100000 FY08 FY09 FY10
Person Days (in Mn) 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 FY08 FY09 FY10
Growth in Person Days 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% -20% FY11 FY12E
Source: MGNREGA website
F.
During the non-farming season, farmers lease out tractors for construction activity, quarrying, transportation of bricks and haulage of water and other high-volume, low-value items over shorter distances. The proportion of tractor sales with higher HP has been rising in recent years indicating higher usage for cargo. Thus it makes owning a tractor more economically feasible for farmers. While average land size has declined, the share of higher HP tractors (>40HP) has doubled from 23% in FY03 to 45% in FY12.
Market Share of Top 3 Players 80% 75% 70% 65% 60% 55% 50% 45% 40% FY03 FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 59% 53% 60%
TAFE acquires M&M acquired Punjab Tractors
74%
73%
75%
73%
74%
65%
67%
Source: Darashaw
The greater level of industry consolidation has substantially improved pricing discipline within the industry in recent years and has boosted profitability.
Margins - Pre & Post Industry Consolidation M&M 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% FY02 -5% -10% FY03 FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 Escorts
Ignored as negative
* Escorts margins are at EBITDA level; M&M margins are at EBIT level
Source: Darashaw
10
Tractor Growth - Mapping Cycles 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% -10% -20% -30% FY89 FY90 FY91 FY92 FY93 FY94 FY95 FY96 FY97 FY98 FY99 FY00 FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13E
CAGR of 7% CAGR of 2% CAGR of 13% CAGR of 15% Cycle 2 Cycle 3 Cycle 4
Cycle 1
Source: Darashaw We believe the tractor industry will continue to witness higher cyclical growth rates in future cycles as witnessed in Cycles 3 & 4 owing to sustenance of factors which have enabled this growth over the last 2 cycles. We expect the next cycle to witness a CAGR of 13% which is the lower rate among the past 2 cycles. We expect the next cycle (starting in FY14E) to have support from higher irrigation, resumption of agri credit growth and continued increase in tractor usage towards non-farm usage.
Cycle 1 FY89-94
Cycle 2 FY94-03
Cycle 3 FY03-09
104% 35%
97% 39%
96% 43%
CAGR in MSP
13%
5%
8%
16%
Moderate
Moderate-High
10%
18%
25%
17%
Low
High
NA
NA
Introduced
Full Impact
Best is behind
Best is Behind
Non-farm usage
Low
Low
Moderate
High
Positive
Positive
7%
2%
13%
15%
0%
11
Tractor Growth (3 month moving average) 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% -10% Jan-10 Jan-11 Mar-10 Mar-11 May-10 May-11 Dec-09 Dec-10 Dec-11
FY14E
Feb-10
Apr-10
Sep-10
Feb-11
Apr-11
Sep-11
Jan-12
Jun-10
Jun-11
Aug-10
Aug-11
Nov-09
Nov-10
Source: CMIE
We have assumed the domestic tractor market to be flat in FY13E and grow by 7% in FY14E
Tractor Industry Volumes 700000 600000 500000 400000 300000 200000 100000 0 FY89 FY90 FY91 FY92 FY93 FY94 FY95 FY96 FY97 FY98 FY99 FY00 FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05
Growth 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% -10% -20% -30% FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13E
Nov-11
Feb-12
Oct-09
Oct-10
Oct-11
Jul-10
Jul-11
12
Source: Darashaw
46%
44%
40%
40%
41%
38%
37%
39%
40%
40%
39%
FY02
FY03
FY04
FY05
FY06
FY07
FY08
FY09
FY10
FY11
FY12
Source: Darashaw
13
14
Source: Darashaw We believe that slowing demand will have a cascading impact on margins as the capacity utilization levels begin to recede and reduce the operating leverage advantages enjoyed in FY10/11. The ongoing capacity expansion of 100k tractor capacity will be operationalised in H2FY13E capacity will rise ~40% - an additional risk from an operating leverage perspective, if volume growth doesnt escalate at that juncture. We expect segmental EBIT margins at 13.4%/14.4% for FY13E/14E from levels of 15.6% witnessed in 9M FY12.
Tractor - EBIT Margins are softening 21% 20% 19% 18% 17% 16% 15% 14% Mar-09 Jun-09 Sep-09 Dec-09 Mar-10 Jun-10 Sep-10 Dec-10 Mar-11 Jun-11 Sep-11 Dec-11
Source: Darashaw
Source: Darashaw
1001-Regent Chambers, Nariman Point, Mumbai
15
Strong franchise and product portfolio M&M UV volumes have grown at a CAGR of 17% since FY07 whereas the industry has grown at 10%. M&Ms above industry average growth trends has been driven by (1) exceptional franchise built around successful launches, such as Scorpio (2003), Xylo (2008) and XUV 500 (2011), all targeting urban customers and, (2) relatively better reach, which has aided rural centric models such as Bolero. M&M has steadily increased its already dominant share from 41% in FY07 to 55% in FY12
UV Market Share 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 42% 46% 47% 45% 43% 41% 42% 47% 55% 53% 55% 24% 22% 22% 10% 24% 7% 25% 9% 22% 17% 18% 19% 18% 19% 19% 18% 20% 18% 20% 17% 17% 18% 12% 20% 13% 14% 20% 14% 13% 19% Others 13% Toyota TAMO M&M
22%
20%
Source: CMIE
Competition less focused, but that could change TAMO and Toyota remain relevant competitors but are unlikely to pose significant threats with market shares of 13% and 20% respectively. We however expect fresh challenges from new global entrants. Of this, we would highlight Maruti Suzukis foray in MUV space in FY13E as significant, especially given its cost advantage and distribution reach. We believe global majors operating in the car business in India will also enter this segment soon. Competition has been increasing, but mainly in the premium SUV segment with products like Toyota Fortuner, Tata Aria, Skoda Yeti, Honda CRV and many others. The direct competitors to M&Ms current portfolio are from the entry level segment products like Chevrolet Tavera, Toyota Innova and Tata Safari.
16
Ford Edeavour Suzuki Grand Vitara Toyota Fortuner Mitsubishi Outlander Mitsubishi Pajero
Toyota Innova
Chev Tavera
ICML Rhino
Mah Scorpio
Premier Rio
Mah Bolero
Mah Thar
Tata Safari
Mah Xylo
Hyundai Tuscan
Skoda Yeti
Source: Darashaw
Based on our growth assumption of 20% CAGR over FY12-14E, we expect M&M to marginally loose market share by 150 bps in FY13E from 55.3% in FY12, owing to the launch of Marutis Ertiga. This is largely driven by the recent success of its high-end offering - XUV 500 (well ahead of competition), and the new launch of a compact SUV in Q3 FY13E, which should likely offset loss in other existing models.
Hyundai Santa Fe
No competition in the
INR Lacs
Tata Aria
Nissan X-Trail
17
32%
33%
33%
32%
31%
26%
26%
FY02
FY03
FY04
FY05
FY06
FY07
FY08
FY09
FY10
FY11
FY12
FY13E
FY14E
Source: CMIE LCV growth to moderate We expect M&Ms market share trends to reverse over our forecast period. While industry should register 28% volume CAGR over FY12-14E, we expect M&M to register 22% growth, there by losing market share of 270 bps. (from 30.7% to 28.0%). Market share loss will primarily be triggered by (a) the entry of Ashok Leyland in the LCV industry with the launch of Dost which has received good response since its launch in October 2011 and (b) the capacity expansion of Tatas Ace from 3 Lac units per annum to 4.5 Lacs.
18
Source: CMIE Although JV with Navistar Automotives will provide M&M access to new age design and technology, we believe that taking market share from present incumbents will prove difficult. Furthermore, unlike LCVs, M&HCV sales need to be supported by nationwide service network. In FY12, it was able to sell 3490 MHCV units, capturing 1.2% MHCV market backed by financing support from subsidiary M&M Finance. In FY11, the JV incurred a loss of INR 1.9 bn and the engine manufacturing JV (which supplies engines to the JV) incurred a loss of INR 0.5 bn. We believe that the JV with Navistar would prove to be a drag to consolidated earnings in the near term.
19
Source: Company
Source: Company
20
Auto - EBIT Margins are softening 16% 14% 12% 10% 8% 6% Dec-09
Mar-10
Jun-10
Sep-10
Dec-10
Mar-11
Jun-11
Sep-11
Dec-11
21
Source: Darashaw
22
Volumes
160,000 140,000 120,000 100,000 80,000 60,000 40,000 20,000 FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12
Source: Company
We see immense strategic value from the deal for both Ssangyong and M&M 1. Comfort amongst Ssangyongs dealers
Ssangyongs immediate gain is that acquisition by a strong auto company would address concerns over management uncertainty. This is critical to infuse confidence among the Korean companys 1,300-strong dealer network and, thereby, drive growth. M&Ms entry would also address Ssangyongs financial concerns, implying better ability to invest in product development. 2. Access to Ssangyongs technology for product development
M&M will also have access to Ssangyongs technology for developing new products.
23
M&M does not have presence in premium SUVs, the fastest growing segment of UVs in India. Ssangyongs recently launched Korando model and its highest selling brand, Rexton, would give M&M entry into the INR 14 - 20 Lac category premium SUV market. 4. Access to global markets for M&Ms products
Ssangyong will also help M&M make further inroads in markets like Europe, Russia, South America, Middle East, Africa and Asia by giving access to Ssangyongs global dealer network of 1300 dealers to sell its own brands.
Ssangyong - turnaround underway Despite owning some strong SUV brands, the company had been facing significant financial stress (losses and high debt) for the past few years, which aggravated operational issues as it could not invest in R&D. It had a debt of USD 650m at the end of CY09. According to agreements with various creditors, funds infused by M&M were used for settlement of debt, which has now come down to USD 85 mn. Ssangyong sold over 113k units globally in 2011. It aims to achieve volumes of 160k units in 2013 with revenue of 4 Trn won (USD 3.5 bn). It aims to sell 300k units by 2016 by boosting volumes in emerging markets of India, Russia and China. Robust volumes and debt restructuring has led to significant reduction in losses FY11 losses stood at USD 11 mn against a loss of USD 74 mn in FY10. Management expects Ssangyong to turn profitable in FY13E.
24
CAPEX
M&M is likely to spend INR 50 Bn over the next 3 years for capacity expansion. In addition to this, they are looking for investments of INR 20 Bn spread over the next 3 years. The ongoing capacity expansion of 100k tractor capacity will be operationalised in H2FY13E capacity will rise ~40% - a tad risky from an operating leverage perspective, if volume growth doesnt escalate at that juncture.
25
Standalone Assumptions
FY11 Tractors Volumes Growth Avg. Realisations Growth Revenue Growth EBIT EBIT Margin 215,452 22% 454,709 1% 97,968 23% 17,083 17.4% FY11 Auto Goods LCV Vols. Growth 3 Wheelers Vols. Growth Utility Vehicles Vols. Growth Total Vols. Growth Avg. Realisations Growth Revenue Growth EBIT EBIT Margin 114,926 30% 64,740 43% 172,933 13% 352,599 23% 386,702 4.4% 13,635 28% 1,717 12.6% FY11 Standalone Revenue Growth EBITDA EBIT DA Margin EBIT EBIT Margin PAT PAT Margin EPS Growth
1001-Regent Chambers, Nariman Point, Mumbai
FY12E
FY13
FY14E
146,993 28% 71,275 10% 207,864 20% 426,132 21% 445,836 15% 19,072 40% 1,697 8.9% FY12E
183,627 25% 79,206 11% 254,367 22% 517,199 21% 463,670 4% 23,981 26% 1,911 8.0% FY13
220,226 20% 80,147 1% 290,636 14% 591,010 14% 482,216 4% 28,499 19% 2,413 8.5% FY14E
227,575 26% 34,562 15.2% 30,423 13.4% 25446 11.2% 43.3 27%
384,186 20% 43,710 11.4% 36,433 9.5% 32936 8.6% 56.1 30%
26
We feel M&M should command a premium to TAMO and a discount to Hero Moto based on various qualitative parameters listed in the above table. M&Ms positional dynamics are similar to that of Marutis on the business front as well as on qualitative parameters. Thus we feel M&M should be valued in line with Maruti at 13x one year forward earnings. However under todays circumstances of a slowdown in the tractor industry we value M&M at a 20% discount to the value we ascribe it under normal circumstances. Thus we value M&M (SA) at 10.4x FY14E EPS of INR 56 to arrive at our fair value of INR 583.
Subsidiaries Value
We value M&Ms listed auto related subsidiaries at a 30% discount to their market cap and listed non-auto businesses at a 50% discount. We assign value of 1x P/B to M&Ms two unlisted subsidiaries that have Navistar as its partner. Mkt Cap (INR Bn) Auto related Ssangyong M&M Financial Mahindra Forgings Swaraj Engines Mahindra Ugine Non-auto Tech Mahindra Mahindra Holidays Mahindra Lifespace Mahindra EPC Value / Share 84 23 13 2 48.2% 83.1% 51.1% 38.0% 40 19 6 1 69 32 11 1 50% 50% 50% 50% 34 16 6 1 137 Value / Share 8 3 11 5% 2% 1% 0% 19% % of Final Value 1% 0% 2% 33 69 5 5 2 70.0% 56.0% 50.7% 33.2% 50.7% 23 39 3 2 1 39 66 5 3 1 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% 27 46 3 2 1 4% 6% 0% 0% 0% M&M's holding M&M's Stake (INR Bn) Value / Share Holding Co Discount Value / Share % of Final Value
BV 495 165
Thus, the total value of listed & unlisted subsidiaries is INR 154/share.
27
We believe the market has yet not factored in the possibility of a flat or negative volume growth for tractors in FY13E. Further, we are considerably below on the EBITDA margin front as compared to the consensus for FY13E and FY14E.
28
Profit & Loss Net Sales Growth Income from Ops. Other Income Income Expenditure Raw Materials Employee SGA EBIDTA Margin Depreciation EBIT Interest PBT Tax PAT Growth EPS
Balance Sheet Equity Reserves & Surplus Networth Debt Sources of Funds Application of Funds Gross Fixed Assets Less Acc. Depreciation Net Fixed Assets Capital WIP Investments Inventories Debtors Cash Loans & Advances Other Curr Assets Current Assets Current Liabilities Provisions Curr Liab & Prov Non-Curr Liab
FY12E 31% 8% 8%
Raw Materials Employee Other Exp EBIDTA margin EBIT margin Tax Rate
Operating Cash Flow Inc / Dec in other op assets Net Capex Net Investment Free Cash Flow Financing Cash Flow Dividend (inc/dec in prov)
PAT / Sales Sales / Assets Assets / Equity Dupont RoE RoE RoCE
Equity buyback/(issue) After-tax Interest Debt Repayment/(issue) Inc/(Dec) in Non-op Inv Inc/(Dec) in Excess Cash
29
30