Dr. Orly TaiTz ESQ 29839 SanTa MargariTa STE 100 ranchO SanTa MargariTa, ca 92688 ph.

949-683-5411 fax 949-766-7603 Orly.TaiTz@gMail.cOM

10.07.2012. Att. Chief Clerk of the Supreme Court of the United States William Sutter Dear Mr. Sutter, I am in receipt of your latest correspondence, where you are stating that I am out of time to file a Writ of Certiorari on Taitz v Astrue 11-5304 U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit as mandate issued in May. Please see the attached docket of the Taitz v Astrue 11-5304 U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. It shows that the case at hand ended on 08.29.2012 which means that I have 90 days until November 30th to file my Petition for Writ of Certiorari, I am certainly not out of time. I am asking you to correct your prior order issued in error. In the Court of Appeals we are simply seeing the same pattern of manipulation of the court documents and docket that we've been seeing during the last 4 years of
Letter to the Chief Clerk of the Supreme Court William Sutter 10.07.2012 1

Obama's regime, particularly in relation to my cases relating to Obama's forged IDs and his fraudulent use of a Connecticut Social Security number 042-68-4425, which was never assigned to him. I would like to remind you that my Application for Stay Lightfoot v Bowen 08A524 was erased from the docket of the Supreme Court on 01.21.2008, right after Obama's inauguration and one day before the scheduled conference hearing by the Supreme Court, and this case was reentered on the docket only after an enormous pressure by the public, media and State Representatives. There was no investigation by the Supreme Court as to who deleted this case from the electronic docket, seemingly to please Mr. Obama, and create an impression that his forged IDs are no longer challenged. My case was deleted when other case were untouched. Later, one of your clerks for Stay, Danny Bickel, stated that it was a technical error, that all cases were deleted, but obviously that was not the case. In relation to Taitz v Astrue, someone removed the link from the Mandate on the electronic docket in the Court of Appeals. There is no link on the docket to the Mandate, someone removed it and wrote on the paper Mandate May 25th, while in reality the Mandate was issued on August 28th.

Letter to the Chief Clerk of the Supreme Court William Sutter 10.07.2012

I am asking you to verify based on the docket that the Mandate issued on August 28th, 2012 and that I have until November 30th to submit my Petition for a Writ of Certiorari. Mr. Sutter, this is the most important matter in the U.S.A. today. This is the matter of the usurpation of the U.S. Presidency by a foreign national using forged IDs and a stolen Social Security number from a state where he never resided and high ranked Federal Judges committing treason against the United States of America by covering it up and being criminally complicit in this Social Security fraud, Identity fraud and Elections Fraud. The decision of the Court of Appeals was to deny my Freedom of Information request for a redacted SS-5 Social Security application for the Connecticut Social Security number Mr. Obama is fraudulently using because: a. Mr. Obama has an expectation of privacy, even though E-verify and SSNVS are saying that the number he is using, is not his number b. There is no Public Interest in knowing whether we have a criminal with a stolen Social Security number sitting in the White House.

Letter to the Chief Clerk of the Supreme Court William Sutter 10.07.2012

Mr. Sutter, I know that you are a retired general of the U.S. military. You took an oath of office to defend our Constitution from all enemies, foreign and domestic. There was never a more important time to do so. I am not asking for any favors, I am only asking you to look at the docket and see that the mandate was issued on August 28th and I have time until November the 30th, that I am not out of time, and am asking you to send me a letter of confirmation of this fact and a correction to your prior letter. Not allowing this case to be heard because of an incorrect and manipulated mandate notation would end in a most egregious deprivation of civil and human rights of 314 Million Americans.

Respectfully, Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ 10.07.2012

cc U.S. and International media

cc Congressman Gregg Harper (R-MS) Chairman United State House Administration Subcommittee on Election 307 House Office Building Washington DC 20515

Letter to the Chief Clerk of the Supreme Court William Sutter 10.07.2012

ph 202-225-5031 fax 202-225-5797 ccGregg Harper, Mississippi, Chairman Aaron Shock, Illinois Rich Nugent, Florida Todd Rokita, Indiana Bob Brady, Pennsylvania, Ranking Member Charlie Gonzalez, Texas cc Congressman Darrell Issa Chairman House Oversight Committee 2347 Rayburn House Building Washington DC, 20515

cc Congressman Mike Rogers Chairman House Intelligence Committee 133 Cannon House Office building Washington DC 20515

Letter to the Chief Clerk of the Supreme Court William Sutter 10.07.2012

cc Congressman Sam Johnson Chairman House Subcommittee on Social Security House Ways and Means Committee 2929 N Central Expy, 240 Richardson, TX 75080

cc Congressman Dana Rohrbacher Chairman House Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations' House Committee on Foreign Affairs 2300 Rayburn House Building Washington DC 20515

US Commission on Civil Rights 624 Ninth Street, NW Washington, DC 20425 C

Letter to the Chief Clerk of the Supreme Court William Sutter 10.07.2012

Public Integrity Section Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Ave, NW Washington DC 20530-0001

Inter -American Commission on Human Rights 1889 F Street, N.W.. Washington, D.C., 20006 U.S.A.. Tel.: 202-458-6002, 202-458-6002. Fax: 202-458-3992.

Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) Special Rapporteur on the Situation of Human Rights Defenders The Honorable Mrs. Margaret Sekaggya Palais des Nations CH-1211 Geneva 10, Switzerland International Criminal bar Hague BPI-ICB-CAPI Head Office Neuhuyskade 94 2596 XM The Hague The Netherlands
Letter to the Chief Clerk of the Supreme Court William Sutter 10.07.2012 7

Tel : 0031 (70) 3268070 Fax : 0031 (70) 3353531 Email: info@bpi-icb.org Website: www.bpi-icb.org

0031 (70) 3268070

Regional Office - Americas / Bureau rgional - Amriques / Oficina regional Amricas 137, rue St-Pierre Montral, Qubec, Canada, H2Y 3T5 Tel : 001 (514) 289-8757 Fax : 001 (514) 289-8590 Email: admin@bpi-icb.org Website: www.bpi-icb.org 001 (514) 289-8757

Laura Vericat Figarola BPI-ICB-CAPI Secretaria Barcelona laura_bpi@icab.es Address: Avenida Diagonal 529 12 08029 Barcelona, Espaa tel/fax 0034 93 405 14 24

Letter to the Chief Clerk of the Supreme Court William Sutter 10.07.2012

United Nations Commission for Civil Rights Defenders Orsolya Toth (Ms) Human Rights Officer Civil and Political Rights Section Special Procedures Division Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights tel: + 41 22 917 91 51 email: ototh@ohchr.org

Full Docket
If you view the you will be charged for 3 Pages $0.30

General Docket United States Court of Appeals for District of Columbia Circuit

Court of Appeals Docket #: 11-5304 Nature of Suit: 2895 Freedom of Information Act of 1974 Orly Taitz v. Michael Astrue Appeal From: United States District Court for the District of Columbia Fee Status: Fee Paid

Docketed: 10/31/2011 Termed: 05/25/2012

Case Type Information: 1) Civil US

Letter to the Chief Clerk of the Supreme Court William Sutter 10.07.2012

2) United States 3)

Originating Court Information: District: 0090-1 : 1:11-cv-00402-RCL Trial Judge: Royce C. Lamberth, U.S. District Judge Date Filed: 02/16/2011 Date Order/Judgment: 08/30/2011 Date NOA Filed: 10/25/2011 Lead: 1:11-cv-00402-RCL

03/16/2012

INCORRECT DOCKET ENTRY-DISREGARD--RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION FILED [1364401] by Orly Taitz to motion for summary affirmance [1353593-2] [Service Date: 03/15/2012 by US Mail] Pages: 1-10. [11-5304]--[Edited 03/20/2012 by KRM]

03/16/2012

RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION FILED [1364625] to motion for summary affirmance [1353593-2](Reply to Response by Mail and Response to Cross Motion due on 03/29/2012) combined with a MOTION FILED [STYLED AS "MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF THE APPELLANT"] by Orly Taitz for summary reversal [Service Date: 03/15/2012 by US Mail] Pages: 1-10. [11-5304]

04/27/2012

MOTION filed [1371429] by Orly Taitz for default judgment. (Response to Motion served by mail due on 05/07/2012) [Service Date: 04/24/2012 by US Mail] Pages: 1-10. [11-5304]

05/25/2012

PER CURIAM ORDER filed [1375820] denying motion for default judgment [1371429-2]; denying motion for summary reversal [1364625-2]; granting motion for summary affirmance [1353593-2], withholding issuance of the mandate. Before Judges: Rogers, Griffith and Kavanaugh. [11-5304]

06/04/2012

PETITION filed [1377943] by Appellant Orly Taitz for rehearing en banc. [Service Date: 05/31/2012 by US Mail] Pages: 16-20. [11-5304]

06/20/2012

SUPPLEMENT [1380221] to petition for rehearing en banc [1377943-2] filed by Orly Taitz [Service Date: 06/18/2012] [11-5304]

07/30/2012

MOTION filed [1387271] by Orly Taitz to recall mandate (Response to Motion served by mail due on 08/09/2012) [Service Date: 07/26/2012 by US Mail] Pages: 1-10. [11-5304]

08/02/2012

CLERK'S ORDER filed [1387293] Upon consideration of appellants motion to recall the mandate, it is ORDERED that the motion be dismissed as moot. No mandate has issued in this case. A petition for rehearing en banc remains pending before the court. The mandate issued July 24, 2012, in No. 11-5306, Taitz v. Ruemmler, where no petition for rehearing was received by the court. [1387271-2] [11-5304]

08/09/2012

PER CURIAM ORDER, En Banc, filed [1388336] denying petition for rehearing en banc [1377943-2] Before Judges: Sentelle, Henderson, Rogers, Tatel, Garland, Brown, Griffith and Kavanaugh. [11-5304]

08/29/2012

MANDATE ISSUED to Clerk, District Court [11-5304]

PACER Service Center

Transaction Receipt

DC Circuit (USCA) - 10/07/2012 09:49:41

Letter to the Chief Clerk of the Supreme Court William Sutter 10.07.2012

10

PACER Login: Description:

ot0363 Case Summary

Client Code: Search Criteria: 11-5304

Letter to the Chief Clerk of the Supreme Court William Sutter 10.07.2012

11