mark everett of the family of austin 2408 Catalina Court to include physical address Farmington, New Mexico without

the United States Grantor/Beneficiary Governor/Settlor

Suit in Common Law, a seventh and 11th amendment right! Presented before the common law court of Farmington Within the territory of New Mexico, County of San Juan

mark everett of the family of austin presenter Vs. Suit in Law, Matter In Controversy, Deprivation of Entitlements, Deprivation of Rights Secured by the Constitution, trust-pass, Denial of Due Process, Interfering With the Right to Contract, Failure to Disclose, Denial of Equal Protection of Law, Violation of the Laws of Humanity, and Uniform Commercial Code article 3, article 8, and article 9. Cause number_______________________

AGENT ROSE BASILE, AGENT RONALD KILTHAU, AGENT DEAN CHAVEZ, MEJ INVESTMENTS INC.

Declaration, Affidavit, Acknowledgement, Common Law Cause of Action

INTRODUCTION OF STATUS and Declaration of Non-decedent

This non-decedent here in after called mark-everett of the family of ben austin of the town/city of El Paso, Texas declares as well as affirms that mark-everett is not a collective entity, or an artificial construct, a Corporation, a legal person, a legal fiction, but a living soul, sentient non-decedent man, with inalienable and on uninalienable entitlements.

mark-everett further declares and affirms that mark-everett does not consent to a judicial tribunal of any sort, that mark-everett does not consent to an administrative hearing of any sort, that mark-everett does not consent to having his matter in controversy heard before officers of the Corporation on any level. Mark1

everett has the right and is entitled to redress, due process in law, and equal protection in law, and mark-everett does hereby knowingly, deliberately, intentionally, and willingly exercise these rights and entitlements.

mark-everett further affirms as well as declares that mark-everett objects to all proceedings at law any violations of rights and entitlements whether known at present, or stated within this presentment, or divulged within the course of these matters, and the objection is expected to be sustained henceforth, forthwith, heretofore.

mark-everett further declares and affirms that mark-everett objects to this Matter being presented before a Corporation, Corporation Officers, Corporation Officials, Collective Entities, Artificial Entities, Artificial Constructs, Legal Fictions, Legal Persons, Legal Individuals, or Anything Related to or Having to Deal with a Citizen of the United States Company Corporation.

As a non-decedent man mark-everett has no owner but the one who created his fore-parents on or about the year 4026 B.C.E. that mark-everett possesses freedom of mind, freedom of intellect, freedom of choice, freedom of thought, freedom of movement, freedom of travel, freedom to redress, freedom within common law.

mark-everett hereby declares this matter to be a controversy in excess of $20, to be a matter within the scope and rules of common law. And as a member of the Public and one of the people of the United States of North America, an inheritor of the land a non-citizen national, mark-everett brings forth this complaint and charge the defendants with the following:

Charge Number One On or about February 19th 2012, October 11th 2012, October 30th 2012, and November 19th 2012 the defendants did the following acts knowingly, willingly, deliberately, intentionally, and participated in an ongoing conspiracy to subject the presenter to the Deprivation of Entitlements, with counterfeit securities. Charge Number Two On or about February 19th 2012, October 11th 2012, October 30th 2012, and November 19th 2012 the defendants did the following acts knowingly, willingly, deliberately, intentionally, and participated in an ongoing conspiracy to subject the presenter to the Deprivation of Rights Secured by the Constitution, with counterfeit securities. Charge Number Three On or about February 19th 2012, October 11th 2012, October 30th 2012, and November 19th 2012 the defendants did the following acts knowingly, willingly, deliberately, intentionally, and participated in an ongoing conspiracy to subject the presenter their unlawful Trust-Pass, with counterfeit securities.

Charge Number Four On or about February 19th 2012, October 11th 2012, October 30th 2012, and November 19th 2012 the defendants did the following acts knowingly, willingly, deliberately, intentionally, and participated in an ongoing conspiracy to subject the presenter to the Denial of Due Process, with counterfeit securities. Charge Number Five On or about February 19th 2012, October 11th 2012, October 30th 2012, and November 19th 2012 the defendants did the following acts knowingly, willingly, deliberately, intentionally, and participated in an ongoing conspiracy to subject the presenter their unlawful interference With the presenters Right to Contract, with counterfeit securities. Charge Number Six On or about February 19th 2012, October 11th 2012, October 30th 2012, and November 19th 2012 the defendants did the following acts knowingly, willingly, deliberately, intentionally, and participated in an ongoing conspiracy to subject the presenter to the harm in their Failure to Disclose, with counterfeit securities. Charge Number Seven On or about February 19th 2012, October 11th 2012, October 30th 2012, and November 19th 2012 the defendants did the following acts knowingly, willingly, deliberately, intentionally, and participated in an ongoing conspiracy to subject the presenter to the Denial of Equal Protection of Law, with counterfeit securities. Charge Number Eight On or about February 19th 2012, October 11th 2012, October 30th 2012, and November 19th 2012 the defendants did the following acts knowingly, willingly, deliberately, intentionally, and participated in an ongoing conspiracy to subject the presenter to the Violation of the Laws of Humanity, and Uniform Commercial Code article 3, article 8, and article 9, with counterfeit securities. mark-everett further attests and affirms that the rules of any Corporation and/or policies and/or procedures were not meant for him the non-decedent man, and that the rules and or procedures for the court are for the Officers of the Corporation and not for him the non-decedent man.

mark-everett has a right, and is entitled to a jury trial, under common law, with common law rules as prescribed by the seventh amendment of the United States Constitution, which supports and attests to his rights and entitlements.

It is mark-everetts goal is to immediately stop the active theft of his property and to seek a remedy of the maximum penalty allowed with-in the scope of the law that is to include but not be limited to punitive as well as compensatory damages. mark-everett demands that the payment be in the form or currency outlined by a joint 3

session of Congress at its highest valued rate at the time that these incidents occurred, and/or the completion of this matter whichever occurs first and has the highest value.

By presenting this complaint before this common law venue mark-everett retained all of his rights, entitlements, and status. mark-everett surrenders them onto no man and/or woman and/or organization, and/or collective entity and/or legal fiction and/or other jurisdiction. This matter is to remain a matter at, in, and under common law throughout its duration to include appeal, and/or transference to any other jurisdiction.

It has come to the presenters attention that this body practices a law and language known as legalese, such a language is foreign to mark-everett and possesses little concept of its wording. If this body chooses to or insists on using legalese mark-everett objects forcefully to such an implementation. mark-everett has a right to have this matter heard in English the official language for the United States of North America as enacted by Congress, or to have an impartial real man, and/or real woman to be a translator throughout all proceedings.

The aforementioned is true and correct, and presented in good faith and intention on this date ____/____/______, and is certified by the affixing of my autograph at top this presentment.

Delete this section before copying and printing: You will print this so as to cover both sides of the document, so page 1 is on side one page to was on the back of page 1). You will utilize both sides of every page and you will put a two cent stamp on the bottom right hand corner of the second page and sign your name through it. All of the highlighted areas you will fill in and delete the parentheses)). Remember the clerk of the court is not going to like this document, but let them know that the law says that you have the right to do this, and that they cannot read your document, they can only see if it has the proper indicators. What are those, a so-called plaintiff or presenter, and a defendant. A case title, a listing of allegations or charges, a signature or autograph, and affirmation or attesting to, and an address for which you may be contacted.

If they give you a problem demand to speak to a supervisor demand that it be taken before Judge so that the judge can make the determination. If they tell you must utilize their forms you ask them the show you the law where it says that you must do that, to show you the law that violates the Judiciary act of 1789 which states "pro se litigants pleadings may not be dismissed due to lacking in form" remember first do not allow them to Call you pro se, do not allow them to call you a litigant, referred yourself as the presenter and keep referring to yourself as the presenter.

It is the courts clerk who will give you the biggest problem, they are there to prevent you from filing for you to fill out their forms putting you in their jurisdiction. You don't want to argue with them you simply want them the show you the policy, to show you the law and to provide information which proves that you are obligated under such policies and such laws. They have their procedures so don't argue with them about their procedures, what they do not have is the right to demand that you follow their procedures.

As far as handling the case itself you want to send a copy of the complaint to the defendants all of them, and you have to send a copy of the summons to the defendants. The summons document you can utilize from the court so you will have to have that before you attempt the file and you just need to fill out the summons document. For service of process you can utilize the United States Postal Service, by sending it certified mail, and or delivery confirmation. The United States Postal Service is the official process service for the United States government, if the government can utilize them so can you. Once the parties are served you're going to include with your service of the complaint and summons a discovery notice and you typically ask for the following: DISCOVERY 1. Any and all records, microfilm, tape, recording, video, audio, computer generated product, documents, associated with this matter, with your (legal fiction/straw mans) Corporation's name, whether associated with this matter are not. (They will argue that this is privileged information so before they do that you mentioned to them that the use of your name is now prohibited and revoked), and they do not have any right to any proprietary use of your name and or files associated with your name. 2. If it's involving a mortgage- Any and all records, microfilm, tape, recording, video, audio, computer generated product, documents, associated with this matter to include but not be limited to the mortgage default 5

insurance, the carrier, a copy of the policy, a copy of any and all documentation of such policy, and when such policy was enacted. As well as a copy of any and all claims associated with the policy, a full statement of accounting referencing the policy, and the name of the beneficiary/grantor/trustee (make sure you indicate that the names that coincide with the aforementioned three is sufficient). 3. A complete and full validation of debt/verification of debt signed by an officer of the Corporation duly authorized to make such certifications/verification and/or validations 4. that you want access to the original contract, with the original with ink signature, and or for them to produce a copy of the loss of document on file, for any loss or missing notes and/or contracts and an explanation as to when the contract became missing and why did they fail to notify you. 5. Any and all IRS documentation including files, microfilms, audio, video, recordings, tape, computer generated product, in reference to this account filed at any time and to list the specifics about which such documents were created and/or generated.

You must also let them know that none of the information you are requesting is privileged, and that they must organize it in such a way to where each of the items you're requesting is specifically identified. That the items that you're requesting must be outlined in such a form that the information you're requesting is readily available without your having to search through each of the specific documents for the specific information. That they must provide written correspondence showing how each of the documents that are sent to you (Any and all records, microfilm, tape, recording, video, audio, computer generated product, documents, associated with this matter) are related to each and every page document, audio file, microfilm, tape, recording, video, computer generated documentation you receive from them.

When you file your case your certificate of indebtedness is what you're going to use to pay court fees, it is basically an IOU, and you can use the treasury our style money orders as your certificate of indebtedness, or the recent one we just put up on the Internet the same day as this document.

We will label both 0000AA 1 and 2 so that they will be easier to find.