Geo,

1.overplaying some stories.

2.on airing some stories without clarification from the concerned quarters,thereby damaging the real spirit of truth,though they do it later but things ist gone had more strong then the later.

3. Oniar some stories of international influence without confirmation from the official sources,which offcos is embarrassing for the the country and it's international image,i.e. ajmal qasab episode,sometimes anti state.

4.sometime making an ordinary story,a breaking news,which in fact has nothing to do with public consumption

5. Curruption stories on aired had no balance bcoz it seems target oriented,,,one political party is the target whereas other parties are also in coalition govt.

6.there is more angling in the current affairs programs,host tries to endorse his own view on the public thereby reflecting his views ,a public view.

Dunya news

1.it's a channel but not an organization.

2.it's policies clearly depicts,channel is for safeguarding other businesses of the owner.

3.it has shown clearly it's position against pml n Punjab govt.

4.on aired many stories without having solid proof like lap top scandle against Punjab govt for which it had to face legal action.

5.don't properly convey or reflect people views.

6.it's current affairs programs carry personal agenda of the hostJournalism and the Web

An Analysis of Skills and Standards in an Online Environment Mark Deuze

abstract The Internet is changing the profession of journalism in a number of ways, which this article looks at in terms of so-called digital, or rather online journalism. This article focuses in particular on the question of if, to what extent and in what respects online journalism differs from traditional journalism. The developments on the Internet in terms of journalism and, more specifically, news on the World Wide Web are presented, leading to a discussion of the three characteristic keywords: interactivity, personalization and convergence. This in itself leads to an analysis of the standards and skills of journalism and journalists online. In conclusion, it is argued that these keywords and journalistic skills and standards closely reflect a contemporary global trend towards community journalism - also known as civic journalism or public journalism - which is an area deserving more study in any analysis of journalism and the Internet.

Hard and soft news: A review of concepts, operationalizations and key findings Carsten Reinemann Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Germany James Stanyer Loughborough University, UK Sebastian Scherr

Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Germany Guido Legnante University of Pavia, Italy Carsten Reinemann, Department of Communication Science and Media Research, Ludwig-MaximiliansUniversity, 80538 Munich, Germany Email: reinemann@ifkw.lmu.de Abstract

Over 30 years, a large body of research on what is often called hard and soft news has accumulated in communication studies. However, there is no consensus about what hard and soft news exactly is, or how it should be defined or measured. Moreover, the concept has not been clearly differentiated from or systematically related to concepts addressing very similar phenomena tabloidization and infotainment. Consequently, the results of various studies are hard to compare and different scientific discourses on related issues remain unconnected. Against this backdrop, this article offers a conceptual analysis of the concept based on studies in English and other languages. We identify key dimensions of the concept and make suggestions for a standardized definition and multi-dimensional measurement of harder and softer news. In doing so, we propose to distinguish thematic, focus and style features as basic dimensions that in their combination make up harder and softer types of news.