Professional Documents
Culture Documents
I l/1
l)
Crimtnal Complainr
District of Connecticut
United States of America
v.
--__
Case No.
DAVID MILLER
Defendantk)
CRIMINAL COMPLAINT
I, the complainant in this case, state that the following is true to the best of my knowledge and beiief. On or about the date(s)
of
in the county
, the defendant(s)
of
FairFeld
in the
Dist c10f
violated:
Code Section
afense Description
Wire fraud
JasonM.Btu@
Prinled name and title
Ciq urd
state:
STATE OF
COUNTY OF FAIRFIELD
and
a Special Agent of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBf), and have been so employed for approximat.ely
am
1. f
four years. r
am
Bridgeport Resident Agency that is responsible for investigating and prosecuLing various t.}T)es of white colrar crime. rn my role
as a Special Agent of the FBI, I have received training in
conducting criminal investigations, and r am familiar with the procedures of the FBr. As a speciar Agent of the FBr, f have
partlcipated in numerous criminal- investigations involving violations of federar criminal Iaw, including investigations invorving mail fraud and wire fraud, securities fraud,
launderj-ng, and other financial frauds.
money
2. f make this affidaviE in support of a criminal complaint seeking an arrest warranL for DAvrD MTTJLER (hereafter, "MrrrrJER")
on one counL of wire fraud, i-n violation of Titie 18, united
St.ates Code, Section 1343.
3. The informat.ion contained in this affidavit is based upon my personal- knowledge developed during the investigation, -;t.. incLuding through witness int.erviews and my revi_ew of documents,
report.s, as welf as other documentation such as emails and other electronic messages involving UIIJLER. Because this affidavit
included each and every fact known to me concerning this
is
being submitted for the limited purpose risted above, r have not
I have set forth only those facts I believe to be necessary t.o establish probable cause for the criminal complaint against
Due
MILLER and
investigat.ion.
seal_ed
scheme or artifice to defraud, or for obtaining money or property by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, or promises, transmlts or causes to be transmitt.ed by means of wire, radio, or television communication in intersEate or foreign commerce, any writings, signs, signals, pictures, or sounds for the purpose of executing such scheme or artifice, shal1 be fined under this t.it1e or imprj-soned not. more t.han 20 years, or both.
Summary
of the Fraud
an
(
5.
am
inwestigation
of DAVID MILLER
relating
to
LLC
"Rochda1e" )
obtain
money and
sale of shares of st.ock of Apple Inc. ('.App1e"). In summary, on or about October 25, 20].2, MfLtER made material
misrepresentations t.o Rochdare and its principals and employees
Lo the effect that a Rochdale customer whose account he covered ("customer #1") had placed an order for Rochdale to buy a tot.al-
MILLER knew
that. that
bore the risk of loss on the trade. The scheme was designed to
generate profits by trading out of the position aft.er Apple
announced
Rochdale was reft hoLding over 1.G million shares of Apple stock. Rochdale ultimately traded out of that posiEion at. a loss
in a separate
part of the
another broker-dealer ("Broker #1") causing it t.o selr 5oo,ooo shares of Appre stock. MTLLER purported Lo be a representative
"Fj-rm A"
#1,
MfLLER
firm, and was not authorized to trade on iEs behalf. purportedly on behalf of Firm A. Specifically,
201-2, !{ILLER f alsely represent.ed
#1
holding a short posiEion of approximately 500,000 shares of Apple stock, which it was required to cover, and thus was placed at risk of loss depending on the direction the stock price took. fn the end, Broker #1 was abLe Lo trade out of the position at profit. 7.
scheme, MILLER caused numerous
a
int.erstate
I.
commerce.
in the securities industry. I and other FBI agents have had occasion to speak with representatives of Rochdale, including some of its principals, as well as persons responsibre for supervising
MTLLER, and other
MTLLER.
9.
Information received from these witnesses ind.icates that. Rochdale provj-des various financial services, j-ncluding engaging in agency trading on behalf of institut.ional clients, and that it does not Lrade for its own account. As a sal-es trader, Mrr-rLER was
responsible for covering the accounts of certain institutional
Rochd.are.
that
MILLER,
accounts he covered.
10.
MTILER
MrtrJER
Establishing a Trading Relationship with Broker #1 L1. The FBI has interviewed several individuals who work at Broker #1, including an employee who has known MILLER for
approximat.ely 10 years and who wilr be referred to as@".ra
gknowsMII,I,ERprofessiona11yandhassocia].izedwithhim
in the past.
L2. According to the inf ormation provided
MILIJER
Uy
14
@,
, 2Ol2 and advised Ehat he would be ]eaving Rochdale to joj-n Firm a. Swas
aware of Firm A because of a mutual acquaintance he and MILLER
MTLLER
toldfltit.t
he wanted to
establish a trading relationship with Broker #1 on behalf of Fj-rm A, as Firm A intended to do some rebafancing of its portfoli-o at
monLh's end. Eadvised
MILLER Lo
back
engaged
practice. 13. several d.ays later, according IoSMTLTJER cal-Ied and ga.refla
new phone number and
falsely Lold$ttrat
he could
no
the calfer
ID
the
name
of a woman.
about this,
MfLLER
falsely advisedflthat
woman
for
whom
then LoIdEto
expect
at
Rochdale
;-.4. Public reporting shows that Apple was scheduled to release it.s quart.erly earnings on October 25, 2Ol2 af ter the
markets cfosed at 4:00 p.m.
communicaLions
They reflect
that, at, approximately 9:31 a.m. that morning, representative of Customer #1, who wil1 be referred to as
"Customer Rep. #1, " sent an instanL message to MILLER to buy
.,b
15. Records reflect that short.ly afLer receiving this order, UfLLER began trading in Apple. Over the course of the day,
MTLLER
in the amount of 125,000 shares. Each such order was executed over a period of time through various Lrading
management system
platforms to which Rochdale had access, includ.ing, but not limited to, a sysLem Lhat gave Rochdale direct el-ectronic access to the
New
one
order for l-25,000 shares, he wouLd close out, the order and promptly enLer a new order inLo Rochdale's order management, system. The records show that. on several occasions,
MTLLER
entered orders to buy 55,000 shares of App1e, but canceLed t,hose orders a few minuEes rater and substituted an order for ]-25,000
MrtrJER executed
multiple
orders to buy 125,000 shares of Appre, closing out the last order just before the market closed at 4:00 p.m.
. i{iLnesses report that during t.he eourse of the day october 25, 2012, MTLLER made certain farse and misleading
L7
on
specifically,
he was
doing a "cover, " falsely implying that his customer was covering a short position in the stock when he knew that was not true. rn
MrLr:ER
compounded
his orders in Rochdale's trading system. This former co-worker advised that turning off Ehis feat.ure in Rochd.ale,s system wourd
have prevented others from easily seeing t.he totar number of
shares MILITER had entered into the syst.em over the course of the
day.
MfLLER
well capit.alized to take on a position of the magnitude of this trade in Apple stock. 18.
MIIJIJER
executed over the course of october 25, 2oL2 were done for the
than customer #J-, would bear the risk of loss if Apple,s stock price dropped as a resurt of its upcoming earnings announcement.
af
for the
quarter.
Once
reflect t.hat. Apple's stock price began to decline. According the large order UILLER had executed, the customer disavowed
1,625 shares). As a result, Rochdale was 1eft. holding a position o.f approximat.ely 1,523,3'75 shares of Apple stock.
Rochdale
Lhe
at Broker
#1
scheme
at Rochdale sel-l
on
the
scheme
of Apple stock. At this time, MIITIJER continued wiLh his bogus story that he was working for Fj-rm A and t.rading for its account ryand the trader at Broker #1, who will be
500,000 shares
referred Lo asE
MIIJITER
confirmed with
MTLLTER
other
things,
MILLER
A, MftLER instructed Broker #1's personnel to leave the 23. As noted above, publicly available documents
show
that
after App1e announced its earnings on October 25, 2012, and trading sEarted again, the stock price began fal-Iing. to@atthispoint,Broker#].ca11edMILLERagain,and he instructed Broker #1 to sLart buyi-ng back t.he st.ock with
10
According
timit of $600 per share. Broker #1 personnel then insisted conLact informatj-on for Firm A's back office personnel.
According to Broker #1's personnel,
names
MILIJER
on
ultimat.ely provided
back
no
MILIJER
stopped communicat.ing
with groker #1 the evening of october 25, 20a2, and Broker #1 was left holding a short position in Apple stock of approximately
500, OOO
was
position. actually
posiLion the next day, and because the stock price dropped, iE a profit.
MILITER
did not have a job offer with Firm A, and was never authorized to trade on its behalf. The FBI has also confirmed with the CFO of
MIIJIJER
25. In the course of and in furtherance of the scheme identified above, MTLLER sent and caused to be sent numerous wire
t.ransmissi-ons in interstate commerce.
in the District
defendant. herein, caused to be t,ransmitted, by means of wire communications in interstate and foreign commerce, writings,
scheme
york,
New york,
Lhe
28. Based on the forgoing, there is probabl_e cause Eo believe, and f do believe, that
DAVID MILLER
fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. S 1343. Accordingly, I request that an arrest warrant issue for the arrest of
such charges.
DAVID MTLLER on
29. As noted above, the cri-minal investigation is ongoing. Accordingly, t.Lre undersigned requests that this Affidavit and the
12
in t.he interest of avoiding compromising the ongoing investigation, until furEher order of t.he Court.
Subscribed and sworn Lo before me on the 3rd day of 2012, at Bridgeport, Connecti ut.
December
UNITED
ISTRATE
13