Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Vena W.
1, Chu
Laurence C. Asa K. Richard R. Colin J. Lincoln H. 4, Carl J. Legleiter4, Alberto E. Behar5, Marco Tedesco6, Kang Yang1,7 Brandon T. Overstreet
1UCLA Department of Geography, 1255 Bunche Hall, Los Angeles, CA 90095 (venachu@ucla.edu)
4Department of Geography, University of Wyoming, 1000 E. University Ave., Laramie, WY, 82071 5Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA
1, Smith
2, Rennermalm
3, Forster
1, Gleason
1, Pitcher
Samiah E.
2, Moustafa
C43C-0618
2Department of Geography, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, 54 Joyce Kilmer Avenue, Piscataway, New Jersey 08854 3Department of Geography, University of Utah, 260 S. Central Campus Dr., Salt Lake City, UT 84112
6Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, The City College of New York, 160 Convent Ave., New York City, NY, 10031 7Department of Geographic Information Science, Nanjing University, 210093, China
1 Introduction
Increasing surface melting on the Greenland ice sheet and rising sea level have heightened the need for understanding the complex pathways transporting meltwater from the ice sheet surface to the ice edge and the ocean. Supraglacial streams are abundant throughout the ablation zone, transporting large volumes of meltwater into moulins and crevasses (Colgan et al., 2011), yet these streams remain poorly studied. Here we present a study of supraglacial stream hydraulics and geometry in the ablation zone of western Greenland during summer 2012. We measured various parameters including flow width, depth, velocity, and water surface slope at different elevations and stream network types in a 75 km transect spanning 500 m to 1480 m in elevation. This transect includes two highly sampled catchments, one at 500 m (Ice Edge) and one at 875 m elevation (Ice Camp), and 6 other day trip sites, yielding a total of 78 cross-sections.
3 Field locations
0.1 0.001 10
w = 3.260Q0.516 R = 0.883, n = 78
0.01 0.1 1 10 100
f = 0.498
1
Combining 78 cross-sections from a 75 km transect spanning various stream types and catchments yields a universal hydraulic geometry for Greenland Ice Sheet supraglacial streams. Width and depth show high and very similar b and f exponents, while velocity shows a nearzero m exponent, indicating that discharge is predominantely driven by variations in width and depth. With velocity less important and averaging ~1 m/s, the three variables controlling dicharge may possibly be simplified to just two, width and depth.
2
Hydraulic geometry
Hydraulic geometry describes an empirical model where changes in width, w, depth, d, and velocity, v at cross-sections are power functions of discharge, Q (Leopold and Maddock, 1953): w = aQb; d = cQf; v = kQm, where ack = b+f+m = 1 Science questions: What are the relationships between supraglacial stream hydraulics and geometries, and are they scaleable to larger rivers? Is there a universal hydraulic geometry for Greenland Ice Sheet supraglacial streams?
10
m = -0.014
0.01
0.1
10
100
1293m elev 4 cross-sections 1410m elev 1080m elev 1200m elev 1080m elev 1 cross-sections 2 cross-sections 1 cross-sections 2 cross-sections
Min 0.006 0.20 0.03 0.24 0.008 0.21 1.3 0.024 0.055 0.009 0.001
Mean 3.749 4.62 0.48 1.08 5.756 6.01 11.2 0.363 0.892 0.136 0.032
Max 28.782 19.06 1.95 2.60 29.000 31.14 42.2 1.627 3.116 1.278 0.088
0.1
0.01 0.001
d = 0.331Q0.498 R = 0.897, n = 78
1.5
1.5
0.5
0.5
0.1 0.001
v= R = 0.003, n = 78
0.01 0.1 1 10 100
0.927Q-0.014
Width (m)
Width (m)
Legend
Discharge (m3s-1) Fig. 5. Power functions relating discharge with width, average depth, and average surface velocity for the 78 cross-sections.
Fig. 6. (Left image) The relationship between width and average depth shows a strong correlation, providing the possibility for extracting depths from remotely-sensed widths. (Right image) Width is is also strongly correlated with hydraulic radius, a component of Mannings n. The empirically-derived Mannings n represents surface roughness and sinuosity and can be used to calculate velocity using hydraulic radius and slope.
! (
! .
7 Conclusion
This study provides a first assessment of supraglacial stream hydraulic relationships and preliminary findings integrating those relationships with remotely-sensed imagery. While hydraulic geometry relationships are traditionally evaluated for downstream reaches of the same stream catchment, results show that hydraulic relationships across a variety of cross-sections and catchments yield a universal hydraulic geometry for Greenland Ice Sheet supraglacial streams. Velocity is typically the parameter with the highest rate of change with discharge in other supraglacial environments, driven by both steep slopes and relatively low resistance from smooth stream beds (Brykala 1999; Knighton 1981; Marston 1983), but here discharge is controlled almost equally by width and depth variations, with very little contribution from velocities. While the strong relationship between width and depth over larger scales may help constrain water flux measurements, preliminary results show that empirical models relating depth to spectral reflectance ratios can map depths from satellite imagery. Future work will assess our ability to estimating ablation zone meltwater fluxes at other ice sheet locations using high-resolution WV2 satellite imagery.
Fig. 2. Locations of stream measurements in southwest Greenland over the period of July 20 - August 20 in summer of 2012 along a 75 km transect. Each site is labeled with the elevation and number of cross-sectional hydraulic measurements. Two highly sampled sites at 500 m and 875 m also provide measurements of ablation rate, stream water and temperature data, and meteorological variables. Rivers are extracted from World-View 2 imagery from July 18-23, 2012 coincident with the field campaign.
Meteorological measurements
Cloudy
Temperature ( C)
4 3
800 600
2 1 0 200 -1 -2 7/20 0 7/21 7/22 7/23 7/24 Temperature, C Upward shortwave radiation, W/m Downward shortwave radiation, W/m 400
a)
References
Brykala D (1999). Hydraulic geometry of a supraglacial stream on the Waldemar Glacier (Spitsbergen) in the summer. Polish Polar Studies 5164. Colgan W, Steffen K, McLamb WS, et al. (2011). An increase in crevasse extent, West Greenland: Hydrologic implications. Geophysical Research Letters 38:17. Leopold LB, Maddock TJ (1953). The hydraulic geometry of stream channels and some physiographic implications. U S Geological Survey Professional Paper 252:157. Knighton AD (1981). Channel form and flow characteristics of supraglacial streams, Austre Okstindbreen, Norway. Arctic and Alpine Research 13:295306. Marston RA (1983). Supraglacial stream dynamics on the Juneau lcefield. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 73:597608. Yang K, Smith LC (in press). Supraglacial streams on the Greenland Ice Sheet delineated from combined spectral-shape information in high resolution satellite imagery. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.
Fig. 3. Ice Camp meteorological measurements of temperature and upward/downward shortwave radiation. A heavily overcast day on July 22, 2012 dampened to diurnal temperature variation and muted the shortwave radiation.
25 20 15 10 5 7/20/2012 17:00
Temperature ( C)
7/21/2012 05:00
7/21/2012 17:00
7/22/2012 05:00
7/22/2012 17:00
7/23/2012 05:00
7/23/2012 17:00
a)
b)
c)
Acknowledgments
b)
Fig. 4. WV2 imagery from July 18, 2012 showing (a) the extracted water mask, and (b) retrieved water depths from application of the empirical model: d = -0.936 + 3.09ln(R545/R605)
This work was supported by the NASA Cryospheric Sciences Program grant NNX11AQ38G, managed by Dr. Thomas P. Wagner. The WorldView imagery was provided by Paul Morin and Claire Porter from the Polar Geospatial Center at the University of Minnesota. We thank Kangerlussuaq International Science Support (KISS) for providing logistical support for field work.
Fig. 1. a) Surface velocity measured using a portable velocity meter and near-surface velocity measured using a mechanical flowmeter. b) ADCP tethered to a cross-sectional cable for measuring depth and velocity. c) Water surface slope measurement using an automatic level and leveling rod.
Fig. 4. Ice Camp meteorological measurements of temperature and upward/downward shortwave radiation. A heavily overcast day on July 22, 2012 dampened to diurnal temperature variation and muted the shortwave radiation.