Professional Documents
Culture Documents
+ =
/* /*
N9 N9
0.75(1.331.37) It (.4/12)(69.769.7-50) Ieet
2.03 It. 2.98 Ieet
NESC Vertical
Separation in the Span 5.01 Ieet
RUS Recommended
Clearance NESC Vertical Separation RUS Adder
5.01 Ieet .5 Ieet
5.51 Ieet (5.5 Ieet in RUS Table 6-1)
6.3 Maximum Span as Limited by Conductor Separation Under Differential Ice Loading
Conditions
6.3.1 General: There is a tendency among conductors covered with ice, Ior the conductor
closest to the ground to drop its ice Iirst. Upon unloading its ice the lower conductor may jump
up toward the upper conductor, possibly resulting in a temporary short circuit. AIter the lower
conductor recovers Irom its initial ice-jump it may settle into a position with less sag than beIore,
which may persist Ior long periods oI time. II the upper conductor has not dropped its ice, the
reduced separation may result in a Ilashover between phases.
The clearance recommendations provided in paragraph 6.3.2 oI this section are intended to
insure that suIIicient separation will be maintained during diIIerential ice loading conditions with
an approach towards providing clearance Ior the ice-jump.
6.3.2 Clearance Recommendations: The minimum vertical distance (D
v
) in span between
phase conductors, and between phase conductors and overhead ground wires under diIIerential
ice loading conditions, are provided in Table 6-1. These vertical separations in span are
recommended in cases where the horizontal separation between conductors (H) is greater than
one Ioot (H _1.0 It). When conductors or wires are directly over one another or have less than a
1 Ioot horizontal oIIset, it is recommended that an additional 2 Ieet oI clearance be added to the
values given in Table 6-1. The purpose oI this requirement is to improve the perIormance oI the
line under ice-jump conditions. It has been Iound that a horizontal oIIset oI as little as 1 Ioot
signiIicantly lessens the ice-jump problem. Figure 6-4 indicates the horizontal and vertical
components oI clearance and their relationship.
FIGURE 6-2: MINIMUM DISTANCE BETWEEN CONDUCTORS
Lower conductor at 32 F,
Iinal sag, no ice.
Upper conductor at 32 F
Iinal sag, maximum ice
H
v
D
Revised May, 2005
Upper conductor at 32F, Iinal sag,
ice Ior medium or heavy loading district.
Bulletin 1724E-200
Page 6-7
6.3.3 Conditions Under Which Clearances Apply: RUS recommends that lines be designed
so that clearances are considered with the upper conductor at 32F, final sag, and a radial
thickness of ice equal to the ice thickness from either the medium loading district or the heavy
loading district. The lower conductor should be at 32F, final sag, no ice. The designer is
reminded to check clearances for the upper conductor at the maximum operating temperature (no
wind) and the lower conductor at ambient temperature (see Note F of Table 6-1).
6.4 Overhead Ground Wire Sags and Clearances: In addition to checking clearances
between the overhead ground wire (OHGW) and phase conductors under differential ice loading
conditions, it is also important that the relative sags of the phase conductors and the OHGW be
coordinated so that under more commonly occurring conditions, there will be a reasonably low
chance of a mid-span flashover. Adequate midspan separation is usually assured for standard
RUS structures by keeping the sag of the OHGW at 60F initial sag, no load conditions to
80 percent of the phase conductors under the same conditions.
6.5 Maximum Span as Limited by Galloping
6.5.1 The Galloping Phenomenon: Galloping, sometimes called dancing, is a phenomenon
where the transmission line conductors vibrate with very large amplitudes. This movement of
conductors may result in: (1) contact between phase conductors or between phase conductors
and overhead ground wires, resulting in electrical outages and conductor burning, (2) conductor
failure at support point due to the violent stress caused by galloping, (3) possible structure
damage, and (4) excessive conductor sag due to the overstressing of conductors.
Galloping usually occurs only when a steady, moderate wind blows over a conductor covered by
a layer of ice deposited by freezing rain, mist or sleet. The coating may vary from a very thin
glaze on one side to a solid three-inch cover and may give the conductor a slightly out-of-round,
elliptical, or quasi-airfoil shape. The wind blowing over this irregular shape results in
aerodynamic lift which causes the conductor to gallop. The driving wind can be anything
between 5 to 45 miles per hour at an angle to the line of 10 to 90 degrees and may be unsteady in
velocity or direction.
During galloping, the conductors oscillate elliptically at frequencies on the order of 1-Hz or less
with vertical amplitudes of several feet. Sometimes two loops appear, superimposed on one
basic loop. Single-loop galloping rarely occurs in spans over 600 to 700 feet. This is fortunate
since it would be impractical to provide clearances large enough in long spans to prevent the
possibility of contact between phases. In double-loop galloping, the maximum amplitude
usually occurs at the quarter span points and is smaller than that resulting from single-loop
galloping. There are several measures that can be incorporated at the design stage of a line to
reduce potential conductor contacts caused by galloping, such as designing the line to have
shorter spans, or increased phase separation. The H-frame structures provide very good phase
spacing for reducing galloping contacts.
6.5.2 Galloping Considerations in the Design of Transmission Lines: In areas where
galloping is either historically known to occur or is expected, designers should indicate design
measures that will minimize galloping and galloping problems, especially conductor contacts.
The primary tool for assuring absence of conductor contacts is to superimpose Lissajous ellipses
over a scaled diagram of the structure to indicate the theoretical path of a galloping conductor.
See Figures 6-3 and 6-4. To avoid contact between phase conductors or between phase
conductors and overhead ground wires, none of the conductor ellipses should touch one another.
However, if galloping is expected to be infrequent and of minimal severity, there may be
situations where allowing ellipses to overlap may be the favored design choice when economics
are considered.
Revised May, 2005
B
u
l
l
e
t
i
n
1
7
2
4
E
-
2
0
0
P
a
g
e
7
-
1
3
R
e
v
i
s
e
d
M
a
y
,
2
0
0
5
F
I
G
U
R
E
7
-
6
:
I
N
S
U
L
A
T
O
R
S
W
I
N
G
C
H
A
R
T
F
O
R
E
X
A
M
P
L
E
7
-
9
(
c
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
)
c
i
c
c
w
W
w
p
H
S
T
V
S
2
t
a
n
2
s
i
n
2
=
0
H
S
=
2
0
0
H
S
=
4
0
0
H
S
=
8
0
0
H
S
=
1
0
0
0
=
s
i
n
/
2
0
0
0
0
a
n
g
l
e
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
v
e
r
t
i
c
a
l
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
w
h
i
c
h
i
n
s
u
l
a
t
o
r
s
t
r
i
n
g
s
w
i
n
g
s
.
a
)
(
2
)
(
T
)
(
s
i
n
/
2
)
0
0
0
0
=
l
i
n
e
a
n
g
l
e
b
)
(
H
S
)
(
p
c
)
1
1
0
.
8
0
2
2
1
.
6
0
4
4
3
.
2
0
5
5
4
.
0
0
T
=
c
o
n
d
u
c
t
o
r
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
a
+
b
1
1
0
.
8
0
2
2
1
.
6
0
4
4
3
.
2
0
5
5
4
.
0
0
H
S
=
h
o
r
i
z
o
n
t
a
l
s
p
a
n
c
)
(
w
c
)
(
t
a
n
)
1
.
4
6
0
1
.
4
6
0
1
.
4
6
0
1
.
4
6
0
V
S
=
v
e
r
t
i
c
a
l
s
p
a
n
d
)
(
a
+
b
)
/
c
7
5
.
7
7
1
5
1
.
5
3
3
0
3
.
0
7
3
7
8
.
8
3
p
c
=
w
i
n
d
l
o
a
d
o
n
c
o
n
d
u
c
t
o
r
s
e
)
W
i
/
(
2
)
(
w
c
)
6
1
.
7
0
6
1
.
7
0
6
1
.
7
0
6
1
.
7
0
w
c
=
w
e
i
g
h
t
o
f
c
o
n
d
u
c
t
o
r
/
f
t
.
d
e
=
V
S
1
4
.
0
7
8
9
.
8
3
2
4
1
.
3
7
3
1
7
.
1
3
W
i
=
w
e
i
g
h
t
o
f
i
n
s
u
l
a
t
o
r
s
t
r
i
n
g
=
1
H
S
=
2
0
0
H
S
=
4
0
0
H
S
=
8
0
0
H
S
=
1
0
0
0
s
i
n
/
2
.
0
0
8
7
2
7
.
0
0
8
7
2
7
.
0
0
8
7
2
7
.
0
0
8
7
2
7
a
)
(
2
)
(
T
)
(
s
i
n
/
2
)
1
.
0
8
.
9
8
1
0
8
.
9
8
1
0
8
.
9
8
1
0
8
.
9
8
b
)
(
H
S
)
(
p
c
)
1
1
0
.
8
0
2
2
1
.
6
0
4
4
3
.
2
0
5
5
4
.
0
0
a
+
b
2
1
9
.
7
8
3
3
0
.
5
8
5
5
2
.
1
8
6
6
2
.
9
8
c
)
(
w
c
)
(
t
a
n
)
1
.
4
6
0
1
.
4
6
0
1
.
4
6
0
1
.
4
6
0
d
)
(
a
+
b
)
/
c
1
5
0
.
2
9
2
2
6
.
0
5
3
7
7
.
5
9
4
5
3
.
3
5
e
)
W
i
/
(
2
)
(
w
c
)
6
1
.
7
0
6
1
.
7
0
6
1
.
7
0
6
1
.
7
0
d
e
=
V
S
8
8
.
5
9
1
6
4
.
3
5
3
1
5
.
8
9
3
9
1
.
6
5
=
2
H
S
=
2
0
0
H
S
=
4
0
0
H
S
=
8
0
0
H
S
=
1
0
0
0
S
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
:
T
H
-
1
0
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
R
u
l
i
n
g
s
p
a
n
8
0
0
_
_
_
f
t
.
s
i
n
/
2
.
0
1
7
4
5
2
.
0
1
7
4
5
2
.
0
1
7
4
5
2
.
0
1
7
4
5
2
C
o
n
d
u
c
t
o
r
:
7
9
5
2
6
/
7
A
C
S
R
L
o
a
d
i
n
g
d
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
:
H
e
a
v
y
a
)
(
2
)
(
T
)
(
s
i
n
/
2
)
2
1
7
.
9
5
2
1
7
.
9
5
2
1
7
.
9
5
2
1
7
.
9
5
V
o
l
t
a
g
e
:
1
6
1
k
V
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
N
o
o
f
I
n
s
u
l
a
t
o
r
s
:
1
0
_
_
_
b
)
(
H
S
)
(
p
c
)
1
1
0
.
8
0
2
2
1
.
6
0
4
4
3
.
2
0
5
5
4
.
0
0
I
n
s
u
l
a
t
o
r
S
w
i
n
g
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
:
M
o
d
e
r
a
t
e
w
i
n
d
_
_
_
_
_
_
a
+
b
3
2
8
.
7
5
4
3
9
.
5
5
6
6
1
.
1
5
7
7
1
.
9
5
(
F
=
6
p
s
f
a
t
0
F
)
c
)
(
w
c
)
(
t
a
n
)
1
.
4
6
0
1
.
4
6
0
1
.
4
6
0
1
.
4
6
0
=
5
3
.
2
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
d
)
(
a
+
b
)
/
c
2
2
4
.
8
0
3
0
0
.
5
7
4
5
2
.
1
0
5
2
7
.
8
7
p
c
=
0
.
5
5
4
l
b
s
.
/
f
t
_
_
_
_
C
o
n
d
u
c
t
o
r
d
i
a
:
1
.
1
0
8
_
_
e
)
W
i
/
(
2
)
(
w
c
)
6
1
.
7
0
6
1
.
7
0
6
1
.
7
0
6
1
.
7
0
w
c
=
1
.
0
9
4
0
l
b
s
.
/
f
t
d
e
=
V
S
1
6
3
.
1
0
2
3
8
.
8
7
3
9
0
.
4
0
4
6
6
.
1
7
T
=
6
,
2
4
4
l
b
s
_
_
_
p
c
=
(
d
)
(
F
)
1
2
W
i
=
1
3
5
l
b
s
=
5
3
.
2
B
u
l
l
e
t
i
n
1
7
2
4
E
-
2
0
0
P
a
g
e
7
-
1
4
R
e
v
i
s
e
d
M
a
y
,
2
0
0
5
F
I
G
U
R
E
7
-
6
:
I
N
S
U
L
A
T
O
R
S
W
I
N
G
C
H
A
R
T
F
O
R
E
X
A
M
P
L
E
7
-
9
(
c
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
)
c
i
c
c
w
W
w
p
H
S
T
V
S
2
t
a
n
2
s
i
n
2
=
0
H
S
=
2
0
0
H
S
=
4
0
0
H
S
=
8
0
0
H
S
=
1
0
0
0
=
s
i
n
/
2
0
0
0
0
a
n
g
l
e
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
v
e
r
t
i
c
a
l
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
w
h
i
c
h
i
n
s
u
l
a
t
o
r
s
t
r
i
n
g
s
w
i
n
g
s
.
a
)
(
2
)
(
T
)
(
s
i
n
/
2
)
0
0
0
0
=
l
i
n
e
a
n
g
l
e
b
)
(
H
S
)
(
p
c
)
2
3
0
.
8
0
4
6
1
.
6
0
9
2
3
.
2
0
1
1
5
4
.
0
0
T
=
c
o
n
d
u
c
t
o
r
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
a
+
b
2
3
0
.
8
0
4
6
1
.
6
0
9
2
3
.
2
0
1
1
5
4
.
0
0
H
S
=
h
o
r
i
z
o
n
t
a
l
s
p
a
n
c
)
(
w
c
)
(
t
a
n
)
5
.
0
2
5
.
0
2
5
.
0
2
5
.
0
2
V
S
=
v
e
r
t
i
c
a
l
s
p
a
n
d
)
(
a
+
b
)
/
c
4
6
.
0
0
9
2
.
0
0
1
8
3
.
9
9
2
2
9
.
9
9
p
c
=
w
i
n
d
l
o
a
d
o
n
c
o
n
d
u
c
t
o
r
s
e
)
W
i
/
(
2
)
(
w
c
)
6
1
.
7
0
6
1
.
7
0
6
1
.
7
0
6
1
.
7
0
w
c
=
w
e
i
g
h
t
o
f
c
o
n
d
u
c
t
o
r
/
f
t
.
d
e
=
V
S
-
1
5
.
7
0
3
0
.
3
0
1
2
2
.
2
9
1
6
8
.
2
9
W
i
=
w
e
i
g
h
t
o
f
i
n
s
u
l
a
t
o
r
s
t
r
i
n
g
=
1
H
S
=
2
0
0
H
S
=
4
0
0
H
S
=
8
0
0
H
S
=
1
0
0
0
s
i
n
/
2
.
0
0
8
7
2
7
.
0
0
8
7
2
7
.
0
0
8
7
2
7
.
0
0
8
7
2
7
a
)
(
2
)
(
T
)
(
s
i
n
/
2
)
1
8
1
.
5
1
1
8
1
.
5
1
1
8
1
.
5
1
1
8
1
.
5
1
b
)
(
H
S
)
(
p
c
)
2
3
0
.
8
0
4
6
1
.
6
0
9
2
3
.
2
0
1
1
5
4
.
0
0
a
+
b
4
1
2
.
3
1
6
4
3
.
1
1
1
1
0
4
.
7
1
1
3
3
5
.
5
1
c
)
(
w
c
)
(
t
a
n
)
5
.
0
2
5
.
0
2
5
.
0
2
5
.
0
2
d
)
(
a
+
b
)
/
c
8
2
.
1
7
1
2
8
.
1
7
2
2
0
.
1
7
2
6
6
.
1
7
e
)
W
i
/
(
2
)
(
w
c
)
6
1
.
7
0
6
1
.
7
0
6
1
.
7
0
6
1
.
7
0
d
e
=
V
S
2
0
.
4
7
6
6
.
4
7
1
5
8
.
4
7
2
0
4
.
4
7
=
2
H
S
=
2
0
0
H
S
=
4
0
0
H
S
=
8
0
0
H
S
=
1
0
0
0
S
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
:
T
H
-
1
0
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
R
u
l
i
n
g
s
p
a
n
8
0
0
_
_
_
f
t
.
s
i
n
/
2
.
0
1
7
4
5
2
.
0
1
7
4
5
2
.
0
1
7
4
5
2
.
0
1
7
4
5
2
C
o
n
d
u
c
t
o
r
:
7
9
5
2
6
/
7
A
C
S
R
L
o
a
d
i
n
g
d
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
:
H
e
a
v
y
a
)
(
2
)
(
T
)
(
s
i
n
/
2
)
3
6
3
.
0
1
3
6
3
.
0
1
3
6
3
.
0
1
3
6
3
.
0
1
V
o
l
t
a
g
e
:
1
6
1
k
V
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
N
o
o
f
I
n
s
u
l
a
t
o
r
s
:
1
0
_
_
_
b
)
(
H
S
)
(
p
c
)
2
3
0
.
8
0
4
6
1
.
6
0
9
2
3
.
0
1
1
1
5
4
.
0
0
I
n
s
u
l
a
t
o
r
S
w
i
n
g
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
:
H
i
g
h
w
i
n
d
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
a
+
b
5
9
3
.
8
1
8
2
4
.
6
1
1
2
8
6
.
2
1
1
5
1
7
.
0
1
(
F
=
1
2
.
5
p
s
f
a
t
3
2
F
)
c
)
(
w
c
)
(
t
a
n
)
5
.
0
2
5
.
0
2
5
.
0
2
5
.
0
2
=
7
7
.
7
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
d
)
(
a
+
b
)
/
c
1
1
8
.
3
5
1
6
4
.
3
5
2
5
6
.
3
4
3
0
2
.
3
4
p
c
=
1
.
1
5
4
l
b
s
.
/
f
t
_
_
_
_
C
o
n
d
u
c
t
o
r
d
i
a
:
1
.
1
0
8
_
_
e
)
W
i
/
(
2
)
(
w
c
)
6
1
.
7
0
6
1
.
7
0
6
1
.
7
0
6
1
.
7
0
w
c
=
1
.
0
9
4
0
l
b
s
.
/
f
t
d
e
=
V
S
5
6
.
6
5
1
0
2
.
6
5
1
9
4
.
6
4
2
4
0
.
6
4
T
=
1
0
,
4
0
0
l
b
s
_
_
_
p
c
=
(
d
)
(
F
)
1
2
W
i
=
1
3
5
l
b
s
=
7
7
.
7
Bulletin 1724E-200
Page A-3
Revised May, 2005
I. GENERAL INFORMATION
BORROWER: DATE:
LINE IDENTIFICATION:
VOLTAGE LENGTH
TRANSMISSION UNDERBUILD TRANSMISSION UNDERBUILD
___________kV ___________kV ___________mi
.
___________mi.
TYPE OF TANGENT STRUCTURE: BASE POLE:
____________HT. ____________CL
TRANSMISSION LINE DESIGN
DATA SUMMARY
DESIGNED BY:
II. CONDUCTOR DATA TRANSMISSION OHGW UNDERBUILD COMMON NEUTRAL
SIZE (kcmil or in.)
STRANDING
MATERIAL
DIAMETER (in)
WEIGHT (lbs./ft.)
RATED STRENGTH (lbs.)
III. DESIGN LOADS (Wires)
TRANSMISSION
(lbs./ft.)
OHGW
(lbs./ft.)
UNDERBUILD
(lbs./ft.)
COMM.NEUTRAL
(lbs./ft.)
NESC:__________________LOADING DISTRICT
a. ICE: _________in. Vertical.
b. WIND ON ICED COND. ____psf Transverse
c. CONSTANT K ___________ Resultant + K
HEAVY ICE(NO WIND) ______in. Vertical.
HIGH WIND(NO ICE) ______psf Transverse
OTHER
IV. SAG & TENSION DATA
SPANS AVERAGE(EST) ___________ft MAXIMUM(EST) ___________ft.. RULING(EST) ____________ft.
SOURCE OF SAG-TENSION DATA: TRANSMISSION OHGW UNDERBUILD COMM.NEUTRAL
TENSIONS (% RATED STRENGTH) INITIAL FINAL INITIAL FINAL INITIAL FINAL INITIAL FINAL
NESC
a. UNLOADED (0 15 30) _____F
b. LOADED (0 15 30) _____F
MAXIMUM ICE 32 F
HIGH WIND (NO ICE) _____F
UNLOADED LOW TEMPERATURE _____F
SAGS (FT)
NESC DISTRICT LOADED _____F
UNLOADED HIGH TEMP(120FOR OHGW &U.B.)___F
MAXIMUM ICE 32F
LOADED 1/2 ICE, NO WIND 32F
V. CLEARANCES
MINIMUM CLEARANCES TO BE MAINTAINED AT:_____________________________________________________________________
CLEARANCES
IN FEET
RAILROADS HIGHWAY
CULTIVATED
FIELDS
ADDITIONAL .
ALLOWANCE
TRANSMISSION
UNDERBUILD
VI. RIGHT OF WAY
WIDTH _____________ FT. (MIN.) _____________ FT. (MAX.)
Bulletin 1724E-200
Page E-1
APPENDIX E
WEATHER DATA
x Wind Velocities and Pressures E-2
x Conversion Factors for Other Mean Recurrence Intervals E-3
x Extreme Wind/Ice Maps E-4
x Map of Isokeraunic Levels for the United States E-8
Revised May, 2005