Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Coverage Benchmarking data from book Benchmarkingdatafrombook Guideline/Benchmarking for assigning weight Guideline/Benchmarkingforassigningweight 20% 40% 60% 80% Remark 100%
C11 C12
C13
100% 20% %Areacoveredunderwastecollection 5 1 Separatesystemforcollectionofwasteother thandomesticwaste (Biomedicalwaste,C&Dwaste, Hotelwaste, Marketwaste, Dead animal disposal) <10 CPHEEOhasproposedthestaffing StaffdeployedperLacpop. patternnormof2530sweeperswith onesupervisorper10,000population.
40% 2
60% 3
80% 4
100% 5
10
15
20
25
Usuallyonesupervisorfor2530 <4,18< 4,18 sweepers Shouldnotbelessthan80%. 50 Notmorethan5%ofthebeatsmaybe 80 leftunattendedonanyday. 0.4 Onedustbin/containerforapopulation of2000. Recommendedaveragedistance g betweenbinsis500m. Generallytotalwastestoragecapacityin thecityshouldbe2to2.5timesof estimatedtotalwastegenerated. Ideally,thisindicatorshouldbeabove 90%,(allowingfor5%10%ofthewaste beingcollectedbyragpickers) 30
10 90 0
C18
Collectioneffectivenessration(%)
45
60
75
90
Transportation C21 C22 >20 Vehiclesdeployedfortransportingwasteper 100tonn Averagenumberoftripstolandfillspervehicle Trendinrecentmonthsisauseful benchmark.Eachcityshouldsetitsown perday normsbasedonthedistancetothe landfill. Ratedcarryingcapacityofeachtypeof vehiclecouldbeausefulbenchmark. Each loader beat and manual beat has a Eachloaderbeatandmanualbeathasa prescribedrequirementofdriversand helperswithsomeextrastaffas substitutesforthoseonleaveorabsent. Maitenancestaff:4staff/5vehicle,6 staff/10vehicle,17staff/25vehicle,24 staff/50vehicle,(CPHEEOmanual) 20 <0.5 16 1 13 10> 1.5 2 Dependsontypeofvehicle used
C23
<10Mt.
10Mt.
12Mt.
15Mt.
Dependsontypeofvehicle used Lesser staff deployed incase of Lesserstaffdeployedincaseof mechanizedsystem (mechanicalsweeper,transfer stationwithcompactor,etc.)
C24
C25 C26
C27
90%attendecelevelofdrrivers ForPrimarycollection04trip/day ForSecondary02trip/day For Secondary 02 trip/day WorkloadnormfordriversTrendin recentmonths AveragedieselconsumptionpertonnperKm Estimatednormforfuelconsumption Trendinrecentmonths ofgarbagetransported Comparisionwithratedfuelefficienyof vehivleshallbeconsider.
Attendancelevelofdrivers Averagetripsperdriverperday
50 <0.5
60
70 1
80 1.5
90 2
C28
%ofsparevehicle
30%sparevehicleasperCPHEEO manual
<10
10
12
15
Di l Disposal C31
C32 C33
40
60
80
90
C34
Vehiclesatdisposalsitesper100tonnesof garbagedisposed
C35
C36 C37
Consumer'scomplaint C41
Totalnumberofcomplaintsreceivedperday
15
10
C42
Complaintsattendedto.
40
60
80
100
C43 .
20
40 6
60 4
80 2 1,<1
100
C51
Establishmentcostpertonneofgarbage disposed
1200
1000
800
600 Costmaybemoreincaseof workcariiedout departmentally. Lesserincaseofoncontract. LeastincaseofonPPPbasis 250 Costmaybemoreincaseof workcariiedout departmentally. Lesserincaseofoncontract. LeastincaseofonPPPbasis 150 Dependsondistancetolandfill site
C52
900
700
500
C53
Totaloperationalcostpertonneofgarbage disposed
300
250
200
C54
Totalcostpertonneofgarbagedisposed
ComparsonswithothercitiesTrendin recentyears
>1600
1600
1400
C55
Totalcostpercapitaday
Outcome
>0.05
0.05
0.04
0.03
0.02
C61
Levelofcleanliness
Poor
Average
Good
Excellent
>3
25 0
20 20 <25 <26
40 40 25 25
60 60 30 30
80 80 35 35
No No No