Professional Documents
Culture Documents
As shown in Figure 1, the majority of propylene is currently produced in steam crackers and FCC units. In these processes, propylene is produced as a byproduct of ethylene production or transportation fuels. Historically, FCC units balanced the propylene demand fluctuations by varying severity. The other technology routes will start playing a greater role in fulfilling the increasing demand for propylene. Propylene via propane dehydrogenation is typically considered in areas where there is ample low cost propane available as feedstock. Metathesis is emerging as the low capital/low energy production option that can stand alone or be integrated with FCC units or steam crackers for improved flexibility and performance. With the demand for propylene outpacing the demand for C4s, the metathesis process offers the potential for significant improvement in a steam crackers or FCC units operating margins by reducing C4 product and increasing propylene production.
Steam Cracker
FCC
C3 Dehydro/Metathesis
Chemistry
Main Reactions
Ethylene + Butene-2 Butene-2
Figure 2 OCT Process Chemistry Figure 3 is a simple process flow diagram of the Lummus OCT process. Fresh C4s plus C4 recycle are mixed with ethylene feed plus recycle ethylene and sent through a guard bed to remove trace impurities from the mixed feed. The feed is heated prior to entering the vapor phase fixed-bed metathesis reactor where the equilibrium reaction takes place. The reactor is regenerated in-situ on a regular basis.
Guard Bed Ethylene Feed Metathesis Reactor Recycle Ethylene Ethylene Column Propylene Column Lights Purge
2 Propylene Butene-1
Propylene Product
C4 Plus Purge C
4
Feed
C4 Recycle
Figure 3 - OCT Process Flow Schematic As mentioned previously, the catalyst promotes the reaction of ethylene and butene-2 to form propylene and simultaneously isomerizes butene-1 to butene-2. The per-pass conversion of butylene is greater than 60% with overall selectivity to propylene exceeding 90%. The product from the metathesis reactor contains mainly propylene and unreacted feed.
Reactor effluent is sent to the ethylene recovery tower where the unreacted ethylene is recovered and recycled to the reactor. The C2 tower bottoms is processed in the C3 tower to produce propylene product and a C4 recycle stream. Purge streams containing non-reactive light material and C4s and heavier are also produced. Depending on the quantity of isobutylene in the C4 feed, the unit design may include a deisobutanizer to extend reactor runlength between regenerations and reduce OCT unit throughput, resulting in an overall lower capital cost plant. The deisobutanizer is a catalytic distillation tower that isomerizes butene-1 to butene-2 (CDIsom) to maximize recovery of OCT feed. The deisobutanzer option is evaluated on a case by case basis. Ultra-high purity propylene exceeding polymer grade specification is produced without a propylene fractionation system since the only source of propane is that contained in the C4 and ethylene feeds. OCT was originally developed by Phillips Petroleum and was first commercialized in 1965. Due to the propylene demand at that time, this unit processed propylene to produce ethylene and butylenes. A second unit that is still operating at Lyondell Petrochemical in the USA was commissioned in 1985 to produce propylene. ABB Lummus Global engineered both of these units. In 1996, Lummus acquired the technology from Phillips. Currently there is a unit under construction by Lummus for BASF Fina in the USA as part of the worlds largest single train olefins plant. When combined with a steam cracker or FCC unit, the OCT process is a proven, low cost product flexibility tool to increase propylene production and upgrade excess butylenes for greater total product value.
Refinery Applications
In current market conditions, FCC unit profitability is significantly enhanced by the increased flexibility to operate at higher propylene production rates and recoveries. It is currently feasible to double or triple FCC propylene yields by utilizing combinations of customized catalysts, higher severity operation, enhanced FCC design features and improved recovery facilities. Selective Component Cracking (SCC) is Lummuss maximum olefins catalytic cracking process. In this high olefin production mode, though the yield of gasoline decreases, the octane number increases. As the yield of propylene increases, the ethylene yield also increases. Ethylene recovery followed by butylene/ethylene metathesis to propylene can improve overall FCC plant economics.
30 25 20
Yield Wt% 15
ABB Lummus Global has patented a low cost low-pressure-recovery (LPR) flow scheme for ethylene recovery in cat cracking units that does not sacrifice reliability, flexibility or safety. (See Figure 5). In this process, typically greater than 95% of the ethylene is recovered from the FCC offgas stream that is normally used as fuel gas. There are a number of offgas contaminants that need to be removed when recovering cat cracker ethylene; the presence and quantity of these contaminants will vary with crude source and FCC design and operation. Some typical impurities and their concentration range are shown in Table 1. The impurities are removed by a combination of proven processing steps, including caustic/water wash, adsorbtion, hydrogenation or fractionation.
Drying
To Recovery Refrigeration
C2 minus
Deethanization
Ethylene Fractionator
Figure 5 - Low Pressure Recovery Block Flow Diagram Table 1 Offgas Impurities CO, mol % H2S, ppm Acetylene, ppm Water Arsine, ppb Mercury, ppb Ammonia, ppb Nitriles, ppb Nitrogen Oxide Typical Range .05 1.1 50 100 3 100 --0 100 0 300 5 10 0 - 100 ---
Adding the LPR unit results in simple payouts typically less than two years, with excellent returns over the historical range of ethylene prices. LPR upgrades ethylene in FCC offgas from fuel value to product value. Most refineries with operating FCCs have the infrastructure in place for handling propylene product but not ethylene product. So the LPR process can also be used to recover ethylene for further processing via metathesis with refinery C4s to maximize propylene. The LPR/OCT combination further improves the economics over the LPR unit alone. Figure 6 illustrates the IRR over a range of product values for ethylene recovery only and propylene production via LPR/OCT. Adding the OCT to the LPR unit increases IRR 10 to 20% even after considering that historically propylene price ranges 0.8 to 0.85 of ethylene price. This is because the major feed in producing propylene is
butylene, which is significantly lower in price than either ethylene or propylene. The OCT unit combined with FCC maximizes high propylene production flexibility.
300
350
400
450
500
550
600
650
Table 2 illustrates three operating scenarios. Case 1 recovers C4s as a mixed C4 product. This is typical of an operation where butadiene is a desired product for recovery. Case 2 hydrogenates and recycles the C4s to cracking. The naphtha feed requirement is reduced. This operating scenario has become more popular in recent years as butadiene demand has not kept pace with ethylene growth rates. However, this option reduces the quantity of hydrogen available for product sales. A more economic variation of Case 2 is to selectively hydrogenate the butadiene to butylenes to produce metathesis feed. This is shown in Case 3. The propylene/ethylene product ratio increase from 0.55 for Cases 1 and 2 to 0.94 for Case 3. This option requires more naphtha feed but 73% of the incremental naphtha feed is converted to propylene via metathesis. The IRR improves by 3 5% depending upon product price scenarios. Table 2 - Material Balance Comparison
Feedstock, kta Naphtha Feed Products, kta Methane Fuel Gas PG Ethylene PG Propylene Mixed C 4s Pygas Fuel Oil Acid Gas Total 389 760 418 263 196 60 2 2088 393 760 418 0 181 56 2 1810 437 760 713 0 235 66 2 2213 +295*
Feedstock Naphtha Severity P/E Naphtha Feedrate C3- from OCT TIC Gross Margin Net Margin Energy BD Benzene Pygas
Case 4 Naphtha Low 0.65 Base -Base Base Base Base Base Base Base
Case 5 Naphtha High 0.65 2 - 5% lower 15 - 28% 5 - 8% reduction <1 - 3% improvement 2 - 6% improvement 8 - 9% lower 17% less 25 - 50% more <2 - 12% less
Since the OCT unit produces propylene, the steam cracker can operate at higher cracking severity while maintaining the same overall P/E ratio. The higher cracking severity processes less feed and produces less byproducts, resulting in a smaller ethylene plant. Since the ethylene plant is the major cost and energy component, the overall result is that the steam cracker/OCT unit combination outperforms the low severity steam cracker. The addition of the OCT unit to the steam cracker improves capital and operating expenses as compared to larger plants operating in the traditional low severity range. In addition to the advantages discussed for grassroots complexes, the OCT unit can also be used as an effective debottlenecking tool. It can be applied to plants currently operating at low severity and looking to increase capacity without sacrificing P/E ratio or for plants operating at high severity and looking to debottleneck for higher capacities and P/E ratios.
Summary
Demand forecasts for ethylene and propylene indicate that the growth rate of propylene will exceed the growth rate of ethylene. The Olefins Conversion Technology (OCT) from ABB Lummus Global provides a low cost solution to expand the propylene flexibility and profitability of the major propylene production processes, namely FCC and steam crackers. In FCC applications, OCT converts byproduct butylenes and ethylene from fuel gas to polymer grade propylene. In steam cracker applications, the potential quantity of butylenes for OCT will vary depending upon how the butadiene contained in the mixed C4s product will be used. OCT can increase steam cracker P/E ratio from the traditional 0.45- 0.65 range to values greater than 1.1. In the traditional range, OCT improves the overall plant material balance and energy consumption, resulting in improved returns on grassroots facilities as well as a powerful debottlenecking option for existing units.
References
1. Steven I. Kantorowicz ABB Lummus Global, Innovative Technologies for Capacity Expansion and Product Flexibility of Steam Crackers, The 11th Ethylene Conference, Maoming, PRC, November 20-23,2000
2. Ronald M. Venner, Triolefins - The Bridge to Profitability, European Petrochemical Technology Conference London, June 21-22, 1999 3. Thi Chang, JV Builds Worlds Largest Single Train Olefins Plant, Oil & Gas Journal, September 20, 1999 4. Frank D. McCarthy and Aivars E. Krumins, Low Pressure Recovery of Olefins from Refinery Offgases, Lummus 8th Ethylene Seminar 5. S. Kantorowicz and M. Shreehan, Olefins Conversion Economics, Lummus 9th Ethylene Seminar 6. S.M. Edwards, Olefins Conversion Technology, Lummus 9th Ethylene Technology Seminar 7. Aivars E. Krumins, Propylene Options, EEPC HSE Conference 2000 8. K.M. Sundaram, E.F. Olszewski and M.M. Shreehan, Ethylene, Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology 4th Edition