Where Did the Towers Go?

B. WTC Evidence that Must be Explained

4
In addition to explaining why ej ecta is being propelled upwardin what is officially
said to be a downward "collapse," any model of the WTC's destruction, if that model
is to be taken seriously, must seek to explain not some but all of the follo'W1.ng facts,
although these "facts" may also be thought of as occurrences, questions, things, and
anomalies. The alert reader may notice that not even this highly detailed book itself
has been able to cover all of them:
1. FACT: Although Hurricane Erin was located just off Long Island throughout the
day of 9/11/01, both the approach in days before and the presence of the storm
on that day went almost totally unreported. Hurricane Erin was omitted on the
morning weather map, even though that portion of the Atlantic Ocean where she
stood was covered by the map. Astronauts gazing down said they could see the
drifting plume from the destruction of \"V'TC2 and W'TCl but made no mention
of the highly visible Erin. WHY?
2. FACT: Approximately 1,400 motor vehicles were toasted in strange ways during
the destruction of the Twin Towers. WHY AND HOW?
3. FACT: During destruction, there appeared alongside the buildings curious cork
screw trails, called in this book Silfysmngs. WHY?
4. FACT: During the demise of each tower, large enough volumes of dust made of
nano-sized particles went up, enough to block out 100% of sunlight in some areas.
This nano-sized particulate dust in volume enough to achieve sun-light-blocking
density constituted the remains of the greatest part of the destroyed buildings'
material substance. WHAT CAUSED THIS DUST TO FORM?
5. FACT: During the destruction, there was an absence of high heat. Witnesses
reported that the initial dust cloud felt cooler than ambient temperatures.
Additionally, there was scant evidence of burned bodies, although in one case
a man was described as "crisped" even while his jacket remained uncrisped,
indicating an "inside-out" combustion not possible with conventional fire. WHAT
CAUSED THESE PHENOMENA?
6. FACT: Evidence that the WTC dust continued to break down and become finer
and finer long after 9/11 itself came through the observable presence of Fuzzballs.
WHAT CAUSES THIS PHENOMENON?
7. FACT: First responders on 9/11 testified as to toasted cars, spontaneous "fires"
(including the flaming heavy coat of a running medic, who survived), the instant
disappearance of people, a plane turning into a fireball in mid-air, electrical power
cut off moments before \"'V'TC 2 destruction, and the sound of explosions. WHAT
480
Copyright 2012 Reprinted With Permission From Dr. Judy Wood Unauthorized Reprinting/Copying Prohibited
icially
nodel
facts,
s, and
itself
ut the
,torm
In the
re she
~ e the
:ntion
luring
cork-
de of
areas.
cking
lings'
.esses
tures.
case
sped,
HAT
finer
tballs.
'ires"
.stant
ower
HAT
22. Conclusions and Summary
CAUSED THESE PHENO!v1ENA?
8. FACT: For more than seven years, regions in the ground under where the main
body of WTC4 stood have continued to fume. WHY?
9. FACT: Hazy clouds, called FUZ?yblobs in this book, appeared in the vicinity of
material undergoing destruction. WHY?
10. FACT: .Magnetometer readings from six stations in Alaska recorded abrupt shifts
in the Earth's magnetic field as each of the major destructive events unfolded at
the WTC on 9/11. WHY?
11. FACT: Many cars in the neighborhood of the \X'TC complex were flipped upside
down. They couldn't have been flipped by hurricane-force "rinds, since they stood
adjacent to trees with full foliage, not stripped by high wind. WHY?
12. FACT: More damage was done to the bathtub by earth-moving equipment during
the clean-up process than from the destruction of more than a million tons of
. buildings above it. WHY?
13. FACT: Most of the destroyed towers underwent mid-air pulverization and were
turned to dust before they hit the ground. WHAT FORCE CAUSED THIS
"DDSTIFICATION"?
14. FACT: Near-instant rusting of affected steel provided evidence of molecular
dissociation and transmutation. WHY?
15. FACT: Of the estimated 3,000 toilets in \TICl and WTC2, not one survived, nor
was any recognizable portion of one whatsoever found. WHY?
16. FACT: Only one piece of office equipment in the entire WTC complex, a filing
cabinet \vith folder dividers, survived. WHY?
17. FACT: Only the north wing of WTC4 was left standing, neatly sliced from the
main body, which virtually disappeared. FACT
18. FACT: Rail lines, tunnels and most of the rail cars at levels under the WTC
complex had only light damage, if any. WHY?
19. FACT: Cylindrical holes were cut into the vertical faces of buildings 4, 5 and 6.
They were cut also into Liberty Street in front of Bankers Trust and into Vesey
Street in front of WTC6. In addition, a cylindrical arc was cut into the fa<;ade of
Bankers Trust. WHY AND HOW?
20. FACT: Scott-Paks-portable air-tanks for firemen-frequently exploded for
no visible reason. Entire fire trucks themselves that were parked near the WTC
481
Copyright 2012 Reprinted With Permission From Dr. Judy Wood Unauthorized Reprinting/Copying Prohibited
Where Did the Towers Go?
exploded. WHY? HO'X?
21. FACT: Sheets of plain office paper were omnipresent throughout lower Manhattan
after each tower's destruction. This paper, however, remained unburned, even
though it was often immediately adjacent to flaming cars or to steel beams glowing
red, yellow, and even white. WHY?
22. FACT: Some steel beams and pieces of glass at and near GZ had what this book
calls a appearance. WHY?
23. FACT: Steel columns from the towers were curled around vertical axes like ro!!ed
up carpets. Steel columns of this kind, however, when they buckle from being
overloaded, would be bent around the horizontal, not the vertical, axis. \xrHY?
24. FACT: The "collapse" of the towers took place with remarkably little damage to
neighboring buildings. The only seriously damaged or entirely destroyed buildings,
in fact, were those with the WTC prefix, only those, that is, that were a part of the
WTC complex. WHY?
25. FACT: The destruction of WTC7 in late afternoon on 9/11 was whisper quiet.
The seismic signal during its disappearance was not significantly greater than
background noise. WHY?
26. FACT: The facades of WFC1 and WFC2 showed no apparent structural damage
from the destruction of WTC1 and WTC2. However, the decorative marble
fayade around the entry to the buildings was completely missing, entirely gone.
WHY? FROM WHAT FORCE?
27. FACT: In the dirt pile, the Fuming was unusual for its quality of immediately
decreasing when watered, contrary to fumes caused by fire or heat, where an initial
steam-up is the response to watering. WHY?
28. FACT: The majority of the towers (\VTC1, WTC2, WTC3, wrC7) did not remain
as rigid bodies as they "fell." WHY NOT?
29. FACT: The method of destruction in the case of each tower minimized damage to
the bathtub and adjacent buildings, whereas terrorists would have been expected
to maximize damage, including that of infrastructure.
30. FACT: The protective bathtub was not significantly damaged by the destruction of
the T\V1.n Towers.
31. FACT: The seismic impact was minimal during the destructions of \VrC1, wrC2
and WTfC7 and far too small to correspond with a conventional "collapse" as
based on a comparison ,vith the IGngdome controlled demolition.
32.
34.
35.
36.
37.
38
39
40

4
482
Copyright 2012 Reprinted With Permission From Dr. Judy Wood Unauthorized Reprinting/Copying Prohibited
fanhattan
led, even
lsglowing
this book
like rolled
'Om being
WHY?
::lamage to
buildings,
)art of the
sper quiet.
eater than
:al damage
ve marble
rely gone.
unediately
e an initial
lot remain
:lamage to
. expected
uction of
:1, WTC2
Uapse" as
. ." )1) ",,'

22. Conclusions and Summary
32. FACT: The Twin Towers were destroyed from the top down, not from the bottom
up.
33. FACT: The Twin Towers were destroyed in a shorter time than can be explained
by physics as a "collapse" even at free-fall speed.
34. FACT: The upper 80 percent, approximately, of each tower was turned into fine
dust and did not crash to the earth.
35. FACT: The upper 90 percent, approximately, of the inside of WTC7 was turned
into fine dust and did not crash to the earth.
36. FACT: The WTC underground mall survived well, witnessed by Warner Brothers'
Road Runner and friends.
37. FACT: The \TIC1 and WTC2 rubble pile was far too small to account for the total
mass of the buildings.
38. FACT: The WTC7 rubble pile was too small to account for the total mass of the
building, and much of it consisted of mud.
39. FACT: Truckloads of dirt were hauled both into and out of the WTC site, a
pattern that continues to this day.
40. FACT: What this book calls lather, thick clouds of dust and fumes, emanated from
some faces of buildings before destruction, as if large volumes of the buildings'
mass was dissolving into the air. Lather poured from WTC7 for several hours
before its destruction. WHY?
41. FACT: What this book calls weird fire appeared frequently on 9/11. This "fire"
flamed but gave no evidence of providing heat, not even enough to burn nearby
sheets of paper. WHY?
42. FACT: Glass >.vindows on nearby buildings received circular and other odd-shaped
holes without the entire panes breaking. WHY?
43. FACT: Changes and alterations in materials on 9/11 were similar or even identical
in a great many ways to the changes and alterations in materials caused by The
Hutchison Effect. The Hutchison Effect is known to result in material-altering
phenomena of the kinds we have listed here.
c. Summary
To determine what happened on 9/11, not just some but all available evidence
must be considered. \YJe cannot pick and choose which observable facts we may want
L\'iS?'
Copyright 2012 Reprinted With Permission From Dr. Judy Wood Unauthorized Reprinting/Copying Prohibited