Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1
l
1
l
] _
u
1
( t)
u
2
( t)
] = Bu
c
( 2. b. i)
Fr om equat i on 2.a i t i s seen t hat
B = _
1
l
1
l
]
It i s know n f r om t he pl ane st r ess t heor y t hat
o = Fe = Bu
c
= Du
c
( 2 . b. ii)
w her e D = FB.
The dif f er ent i al st r ai n ener gy f r om equat i on 2.a.i becomes
JI =
1
2
( Du
c
)
1
Bu
c
AJx =
1
2
u
c
1
D
1
Bu
c
AJx
t hen f or t he w hole bar el ement t he st r ai n ener gy becomes
I =
1
2
_ u
c
1
D
1
Bu
c
AJx
I
0
=
1
2
u
c
1
__ D
T
BAJx
I
0
_u
c
. ( 2 . o. ii)
The st i f f ness mat r i x becomes
k = _ D
T
BAJx
I
0
= _ ( FB)
T
BAJx
I
0
= _ B
T
F
T
BAJx
I
0
For a unif or m bar t hen
k = AE_ B
T
BJx
I
0
= EA_ __
1
l
,
1
l
,
_ |
1
l
,
1
l
, |_Jx
I
0
k = EA_ _
1
l
2
,
1
l
2
,
1
l
2
,
1
l
2
,
_
I
0
Jx =
EA
l
2
_ j
1 1
1 1
[
I
0
Jx =
EA
l
2
j
l l
l l
[
k =
EA
l
j
1 1
1 1
[ ( 2. o. iii)
St iffness of a beam element
The choi ce of cubi c polynomi al i n t er ms of l ocal co-or di nat e f or li near di spl acement of a l i ne beam el ement i s j ust if i ed f r om t he st andpoi nt t hat
t r ansver se def l ect i on of an el ement of beam not subj ect t o t r ansver se l oads sat i sf ies
4
u
x
4
( x, t) = 0 w hi ch upon i nt egr at i on gi ves a cubic
pol ynomi al [ 1] .A l oaded beam el ement not onl y under goes li near t r ansver se di spl acement s u( x, t) but al so angul ar di spl acement s
u
x
( x, t) at t he
j oi nt s. u
1
( t) and u
2
( t) ar e l inear j oi nt di spl acement and angul ar joi nt di spl acement of j oi nt 1 r espect i vely w hil e u
3
( t) and u
4
( t) ar e t he
cor r espondi ng quant i t i es f or j oi nt 2.
It i s suggest ed ear l i er t hat cubi c pol ynomi al of l ocal co-or dinat e x f or t r ansver se di spl acement di st r i but i on u( x, t) al ong t he l engt h of a unif or m
l i ne beam element coul d be used t o achieve good r esul t s t hus
u( x, t) = o( t) + [( t) x + y( t) x
2
+ ( t) x
3
. ( 3 . o)
Thus angul ar di spl acement becomes
ou
ox
( x, t) = [( t) + 2y( t) x + 3( t) x
2
. ( 3. b)
Int r oduci ng t he boundar y condi t i onsu( 0, t) = u
1
( t) ,
u
x
( 0, t) = u
2
( t) , u( l, t) = u
3
( t) and
u
x
( l, t) = u
4
( t) i nt o equat i on (3.a) and (3.b) as t he
case may be w hil e t r eat i ng t he j oint di spl acement s u
1
( t) , u
2
( t) , u
3
( t) andu
4
( t) as unknow ns gi ves
o( t) = u
1
( t) , [( t) = u
2
( t)
y( t) =
1
l
2
[ 3u
1
( t) 2u
2
( t) l + 3u
3
( t) u
4
( t) l]
( t) =
1
l
3
[ 2u
1
( t) + u
2
( t) l 2u
3
( t) + u
4
( t) l]
If t he coef f icient s as gi ven i n t er ms of j oi nt di spl acement s above ar e subst i t ut ed int o equat i on (3.c) and r e-ar r anged i n t he f or m u( x, t) =
N
( x) u
( t)
4
=1
w her e N
u
1
( t)
u
2
( t)
u
3
( t)
u
4
( t)
= N
c
u
c
. ( 3. c. ii)
If a beam element of l engt h l i s subj ect ed t o bendi ng moment di st r i but i on H( x, t) as show n in f i gur e2, t he st r ai n ener gy st or ed in t he element i s
I =
1
2
_ H( x, t)
0
2
0
1
J0 =
1
2
_ H( x, t)
I
0
o0
ox
( x, t) Jx =
1
2
_ H( x, t)
I
0
o
2
u
ox
2
( x, t) Jx ( 3. J. i)
If anal ogy i s made w i t h t he case of bar above and H( x, t) r egar ded as st r ess and t he cur vat ur e
2
u
x
2
( x, t) r egar ded as st r ai n t hen
o
2
u( x, t)
ox
2
=
o
2
N
c
ox
2
u
c
= Bu
c
. ( 3. J. ii)
But f r om equat i on 3.c.i i
N
c
= __1 3
x
2
l
2
+ 2
x
3
l
3
_, _
x
l
2
x
2
l
2
+
x
3
l
3
_l, _3
x
2
l
2
2
x
3
l
3
_, _
x
2
l
2
+
x
3
l
3
_l_
Then
A E I , , , dx
l
1 int jo 2 int jo
) , ( t x u
x
) , ( t x M
2 . fig
o
2
N
c
ox
2
= _
12x
l
3
+
6
l
2
,
6x
l
2
+
4
l
,
12x
l
3
6
l
2
,
6x
l
2
+
2
l
_ = B . ( 3. J. iii)
Fr om t he t heor y of el ast ici t y
H( x, t) = EI
o
2
u
ox
2
( x, t) = H( x, t) = F
o
2
u
ox
2
( x, t) = FBu
c
= Du
c
. . ( 3. J. i:)
Wher e = FB onJ F = EI. Combi ni ng equat i ons 3.d.i t o 3.d.i v gi ves
I =
1
2
_ ( Bu
c
)
1
Bu
c
Jx
I
0
=
1
2
_ u
c
1
D
T
Bu
c
Jx
I
0
=
1
2
u
c
1
__ D
T
BJx
I
0
_ u
c
. . ( 3. J. :)
The st i f f ness mat r i x becomes
k = _ D
T
BJx
I
0
= _ ( FB)
T
BJx
I
0
= _ B
T
F
T
BJx
I
0
= _ B
1
EIBJx . ( 3. J. :i)
I
0
In l i ght of equat i on 3.d.ii i f or const ant modul us of r i gi di t y becomes
k = EI _ B
T
BJx
I
0
= _
12x
l
3
+
6
l
2
6x
l
2
+
4
l
12x
l
3
6
l
2
6x
l
2
+
2
l
I
0
_
12x
l
3
+
6
l
2
,
6x
l
2
+
4
l
,
12x
l
3
6
l
2
,
6x
l
2
+
2
l
_ Jx
k =
EI
_ _
12x
l
3
+
6
l
2
]
2
Jx
I
0
_ _
6x
l
2
+
4
l
] _
12x
l
3
+
6
l
2
] Jx
I
0
_ _
12x
l
3
6
l
2
] _
12x
l
3
+
6
l
2
] Jx
I
0
_ _
6x
l
2
+
2
l
] _
12x
l
3
+
6
l
2
] Jx
I
0
_ _
12x
l
3
+
6
l
2
] _
6x
l
2
+
4
l
] Jx
I
0
_ _
6x
l
2
+
4
l
]
2
Jx
I
0
_ _
12x
l
3
6
l
2
] _
6x
l
2
+
4
l
]
I
0
Jx
_ _
6x
l
2
+
2
l
] _
6x
l
2
+
4
l
] Jx
I
0
_ _
12x
l
3
+
6
l
2
] _
12x
l
3
6
l
2
] Jx
I
0
_ _
6x
l
2
+
4
l
] _
12x
l
3
6
l
2
] Jx
I
0
_ _
12x
l
3
6
l
2
]
2 I
0
Jx
_ _
6x
l
2
+
2
l
] _
12x
l
3
6
l
2
] Jx
I
0
_ _
12x
l
3
+
6
l
2
] _
6x
l
2
+
2
l
] Jx
I
0
_ _
6x
l
2
+
4
l
] _
6x
l
2
+
2
l
] Jx
I
0
_ _
12x
l
3
6
l
2
] _
6x
l
2
+
2
l
] Jx
I
0
_ _
6x
l
2
+
2
l
]
2
Jx
I
0
The above i s a symmet r i c mat r i x w hi ch w hen simpl i f i ed gi ves
h =
EI
l
3
_
12
6l
12
6l
6l
4l
2
6l
2l
2
12
6l
12
6l
6l
2l
2
6l
4l
2
_ . . ( 3. J. :ii)
Lumped mass mat rices
If t he mass of t he bar el ement i s assumed t o be di vi ded equal l y bet ween t he t w o nodes t he ki net i c ener gy becomes;
I =
1
2
pAl
2
[ u
1
( t) ]
2
+
1
2
pAl
2
[ u
2
( t) ]
2
I =
1
2
pAl
2
( u
1
( t) u
2
( t) ) [
1 0
0 1
_
u
1
( t)
u
2
( t)
]
Fr om w hich i t becomes clear t hat l umped mass mat r i x f or a uni f or m li ne bar el ement i s
m =
pAl
2
[
1 0
0 1
( 3 . c. i)
Taki ng i nt o account r ot at i onal degr ees of f r eedom t he ki net ic ener gy of t he beam el ement i s
I =
1
2
pAl
2
[ u
1
( t) ]
2
+
1
2
I
2
[ u
2
( t) ]
2
+
1
2
pAl
2
[ u
3
( t) ]
2
+
1
2
I
2
[ u
4
( t) ]
2
Wher e I =
pAI
3
12
t hen
I =
1
2
pAl
2
( u
1
( t) u
2
( t) u
3
( t) u
4
( t) )
1
0
0
I
2
12
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
I
2
12
u
1
( t)
u
2
( t)
u
3
( t)
u
4
( t)
The l umped mass mat r i x f or a beam becomes
m =
pAl
2
1
0
0
I
2
12
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
I
2
12
( 3 . J. ii)
M et hod of solut ion
Fr om cal culus of var i at i ons t he Lagr ange s equat i on appli ed t o t hi s si t uat i on i s gi ven by
J
Jt
_
oI
oU
]
oI
oU
= 0 ( 3. c. i)
Wher e L=I
t
I
t
i s t he l agr angi an of t he syst em. maki ng t he subst i t ut i ons I
t
=
1
2
U
1
K
t
U and I
t
=
1
2
U
1
M
t
U
+ K
t
U = . ( 3 . e. ii)
If har monic exci t at i on i s assumed of t he syst em an Ei gen-value pr obl em r esul t s t hus
( K
t
2
M
t
) U = . . ( 3. c. iii)
For w hi ch t he char act er i st i c equat i on becomes
| K
t
2
M
t
| = 0 ( 3. c. i:)
Fr om equat i on 3.e.iv t he eigen-f r equenci es of t he syst em coul d be cal cul at ed. If onl y t he f undament al f r equency of t he syst em i s needed
Dunker l ey s pr i nci pl e coul d be used t o appr oximat e i t being t hat M
t
f r om t he l umped mass mat r i ces i s diagonal . The Dunker ley pr i nci pl e as
appl icabl e in t hi s w or k i s
1
( o
11
m
1
+ o
22
m
2
+ o
33
m
3
+ o
44
m
4
+ o
55
m
5
+ o
66
m
6
+ o
77
m
7
+ o
88
m
8
)
-1
2
,
. . ( 3. c. :)
DESI GN CONSI DERATI ONS
Flexural st rengt h of t he beam
The beam shoul d be designed t o have dimensi ons t hat w oul d enable it car r y i t s ow n w eight t oget her w i t h t hat of t he mot or . If t he l oad
di st r i but i on of t he beam i s wr i t t en as
0
and t he wei ght of t he mot or wr i t t en as w t hen t he st at ic l oadi ng of t he beam i s as show n in t he f igur e3
bel ow
Due t o symmet r y l oadi ng i n t he r anges 0 < x <
l
2
, and
l
2
, < x < l ar e t he same t hus t he l ocat i on of maximum bendi ng moment i s calcul at ed.
The bendi ng moment H( x) i n t he r ange 0 < x <
l
2
, i s gi ven by
H( x) = R
1
x
0
x
2
2
, ( 4. o. i)
JH
Jx
= R
1
0
x
J
2
H
Jx
2
=
0
Si nce t he second der ivat i ve of t he bendi ng moment w i t h r espect t o x i s negat i ve maxi mum bendi ng moment t hus maximum f lexur al st r ess occur s
at
dM
dx
= R
1
0
x = 0 x =
R
1
o
0
=
I
2
+
w
2o
0
. Subst i t ut ed i nt o equat i on 4.a.i gi ves t he maximum bendi ng moment as
H
mux
=
pgAl + w
2
_
l
2
+
w
2
0
]
0
2
_
l
2
+
w
2
0
]
2
=
1
8
_l +
w
0
] (
0
l + w) ( 4. o. ii)
The maximum f l exur al st r ess i s gi ven as
o
mux
=
H
mux
c
I
=
H
mux
S
. ( 4. o. iii)
Wher e c =
h
2
= b onJ S =
2
3
b
3
i s t he sect i onal modul us f or t he beam. Wi t h equat i ons 4.a.ii and 4.a.ii i t aken t oget her and subst it ut i ons
l = 5.4m, w = 4448.22N,
0
= pgA = 243.58 9 .8 2b
2
= 4774 .2b
2
N/ m made w e get
o
mux
=
26102 .9
b
+
8999.3
b
3
+
775 .7
b
5
Si nce f at igue l oad i s expect ed a f act or of saf et y as hi gh as 2.5 w il l be necessar y t hus t he w or ki ng st r ess f or t he beam becomes
o
w
=
26102.9
b
+
8999 .3
b
3
+
775.7
b
5
o
ut
2 .5
If t he beam i s assumed t o be equal l y st r ong i n t ensi on and compr essi on and o
ut
i s chosen t o be 800M Pa[ 3] one of t he const r ai nt s on b becomes
26102 .9
b
+
8999.3
b
3
+
775.7
b
5
320 10
6
. ( 4. o. i:)
Equat i on(4.a.i v) gi ves t hat b 0.0763m.
A
B C
l
gA
0
W
2 l
2
1
W gAl
R
1 2
R R
x
Buckling st rengt h of t he columns
For t he concr et e t o act as a col umn t he sl ender ness r at i o by Eul er s col umn t heor y i s
l
r
= _
NEn
2
P A
_
1
2
( 4. b. i)
N i n equat i on 9 f or a f l ag t ype of col umn i s , P/ A i s t he r upt ur e st r ess w hich i s 7HPo f or cement (3), E f or cement i s given as 27579 .028
10
6
Po and r i s t he r adi us of gyr at i on of cr oss-sect i on of t he col umn. Clear ly r =
J
4
, . i f t he given values ar e subst i t ut ed i nt o equat i on 4.b.i t hen
f or buckli ng t o be t he mode of st at ic f ail ur e J 0.11m . Cr i t ical l oad i s gi ven by P
c
=
NLIn
2
I
2
and i f a f act or of saf et y of 2 used (4) t hen w or ki ng l oad
on a col umn sat i sf ies
P
w
EIn
2
8 l
2
. ( 4. b. ii)
Wher e t he w or ki ng l oad on any of t he col umns i s
P
w
=
( pAlg)
bcum
+ w
2
P
w
=
( 243 .6 2 b
2
5.4 9.8)
bcum
+ 4448.22
2
. ( 4. b. iii)
Usi ng equat i ons 4.b.ii and 4.b.i ii t he speci f i cat i on on b f or any chosen val ue of d becomes
b _
229103162 .7J
4
2224 .1
12891 .3
_
1
2
( 4. b. i:)
DI SCRI TI ZATI ON AND ASSEM BLAGE
The syst em i s di scr i t i zed i nt o t w o bar el ement s and a beam el ement as show n i n t he di agr am bel ow w i t h t he gl obal coor di nat es
St iffness mat rices
The st i f f ness mat r i x f or c
1
(el ement 1) i s obt ai ned by usi ng equat i on(2.e) as f ol l ow s;
1
U
2
U
3
U
4
U
5
U
6
U
7
U
8
U
1
e
2
e
3
e
4
e
5
e
6
e
7
e
k =
EA
l
[
1 1
1 1
= [
Wher e
=
EA
l
= 27579 .028 10
6
nJ
2
4.5 0.3
= 64179.31241 10
6
J
2
Wi t h t he boundar y condi t i ons u
1
= 0 and u
2
= u
1
i ncor por at ed t he st i f f ness mat r i x i n t he gl obal syst em becomes
The st i f f ness mat r i x i n t he gl obal syst em f or c
1
i s st r ai ght f or w ar dl y ext r act ed f r om I
1
t o be
K
1
=
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
The same pr ocedur e car r i ed out on c
2
w i t h t he boundar y condi t i ons u
1
= u
1
and u
2
= u
2
in mi nd r esul t s i n t he st i f f ness mat r i x
K
2
=
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
c
3
bei ng a uni f or m beam element wi t h boundar y condi t i ons u
1
= u
2
, u
2
= u
3
, u
3
= u
4
and u
4
= u
5
has st i f f ness mat r i x i n t he gl obal syst em as
der i ved
h =
EI
l
3
_
12
6l
12
6l
6l
4l
2
6l
2l
2
12
6l
12
6l
6l
2l
2
6l
4l
2
_ = h = _
12[
16 .2[
12[
16 .2[
16.2[
29 .16[
16.2[
14 .58[
12[
16.2[
12[
16.2[
16.2[
14.58[
16.2[
29.16[
_
Wher e l = 9 0 .3 = 2 .7 onJ [ =
LI
I
3
=
206842.71 10
6
2.7
3
2
3
J
4
= 7005.798913 10
6
b
4
K
3
=
c
4
has t he boundar y condi t i ons u
1
= u
4
, u
2
= u
5
, u
3
= u
6
and u
4
= u
7
and t hus t he st if f ness mat r i x
K
4
=
For c
5
, u
1
= u
6
and u
2
= u
8
t hen
K
5
=
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
c
6
has t he f ol l owi ng
K
6
=
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
M ass mat rices
Appl i cat i on of vel oci t y boundar y condi t i ons; u
1
( t) = 0 and u
2
( t) = u
1
t oget her wi t h equat i on(3.e.i ) t o c
1
as out l i ned bel ow r esul t s i n t he mass
mat r i x.
m =
pAl
2
[
1 0
0 1
= _
y 0
0 y
]
Wher e y =
pAI
2
= 39.65J
2
. In gl obal syst em boundar y condi t i ons f or el ement 1 st i pul at es t hat mass mat r i x i s
M
1
=
y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
si mil ar l y
M
2
=
y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 y 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
M aki ng use of equat i on(3.d.ii ) The mass mat r i x i n t he l ocal syst em f or element 3 becomes
m =
pAl
2
1
0
0
I
2
12
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
I
2
12
= _
p
0
0
.61
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
p
0
0
.61
_
Wher e l = 9 0 .3 = 2 .7 , p =
pAI
2
=
243.58312 2b
2
2.7
2
= 657.625b
2
. t aking not e of appr opr i at e boundar y condi t i ons gives a mass mat r i x f or
el ement 3 i n gl obal syst em as
M
3
=
Whi l e f or el ement 4
M
4
=
M
5
=
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 y 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 y
M
6
=
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 y
Assemblage
St i f f ness assembl age of t he bar el ement s i s as f ol l ow s;
K
bu
= K
1
+ K
2
+ K
5
+ K
6
=
The st i f f ness assembl age f or t he beam el ement s i s
K
bcum
= K
3
+ K
4
=
Tot al st i f f ness mat r i x becomes
K
t
= K
bu
+ K
bcum
=
( 5. o)
M ass assembl age of t he bar el ement s i s
M
bu
= M
1
+ M
2
+ M
5
+ M
6
=
2y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 y 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 y 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2y
Assembl ed mass mat r i x f or t he beam el ement s i s as f oll ow s;
M
bcum
= M
3
+ M
4
=
Tot al mass mat r i x f or t he syst em i s
M
t
= M
bu
+ M
bcum
+ M
7
=
. ( 5. b)
M ETHODOLOGY OF DESI GN
Desi gn Pr ocedur e
Inser t i ng t he mass and st i f f ness mat r ices of t he syst em i nt o t he char act er i st i c equat ion(t hat i s equat i ons 5.b and 5.a i nt o equat i on 3.e.i v) r esult s in
det er mi ni ng a det er mi nant t hat w oul d t ake l ong t o eval uat e so t r i al and er r or met hod ut il izi ng M ATLAB i s used t o ar r ive at a desi gn. The desi gn
pr ocedur e i s as f ol l ow s;
i . Chose d and b dependi ng on speci f i cat i ons
i i . Eval uat e K
t
usi ng equat i on 5.a
i i i. Det er mi ne f lexi bi l i t y i nf luence coef f i ci ent mat r i x A
t
= K
t
-1
i v. Appr oximat e
n
usi ng t he Dunker ley f or mul ar (3.e.v)
A t ypical gener al M ATLAB command f or car r yi ng out t hese st eps ar e;
J = ? ; b = ? ; o = 64179 .31241 10
6
J
2
; b = 7005 .798913 10
6
b
4
; K = ? ; K
-1
K
-1
=
?
o11 = ? ; o22 = ? ; o33 = ? ; o44 = ? ; o55 = ? ; o66 = ? ; o77 = ? ; o88 = ? ;
m1 = ? ; m2 = ? ; m3 = ? ; m4 = ? ; m5 = ? ; m6 = ? ; m7 = ? ; m8 = ? ; m = 657.625b
2
; g = 39.65J
2
; = 1 sqrt( o
)
=
?
Wher e o = o, c = [, m = p onJ g = y
Desi gn f or f l exur al st r engt h of beam and buckli ng st r engt h of cement col umn:
si nce t he di mensi ons of beam i s const r ai ned by t he w ei ght of t he mot or f or f lexur al st r engt h and t he wei ght of t he beam t oget her w i t h t he
machi ne i n t ur n bei ng limi t ed by possi bil i t y of buckli ng of t he col umns t hen desi gn speci f icat i ons f r om analysi s become;
b 0.0763m, J 0.11m, b _
229103162 .7J
4
2224.1
12891.3
_
1
2
,
n
157roJ/ s
If a choi ce of J = 0.1m i s made t hen t he above speci f icat i on gi ves t hat b 1.267m. w i t h t he choi ce of b = 1.25m made M ATLAB as di spl ayed
bel ow gives an accept abl e val ue of nat ur al f r equency
n
= 303roJ/ s.
d=0.1;b=1.25;
a=64179.31241* 10^ 6* d^ 2;
e=7005.798913* 10^ 6* b^ 4;
K=[ 2* a -1* a 0 0 0 0 0 0;-1* a a+12* e 16.2* e -12* e 16.2* e 0 0 0; 0 16.2* e 29.16* e -16.2* e 14.58* e 0 0 0;0 -12* e -16.2* e 24* e 0 - 12* e 16.2* e 0;0
16.2* e 14.58* e 0 58.32* e -16.2* e 14.58* e 0;0 0 0 -12* e -16.2* e a+12* e -16.2* e -1* a;0 0 0 16.2* e 14.58* e -16.2* e 29.16* e 0;0 0 0 0 0 -1* a 0
2* a] ;
K^ -1
ans =
1.0e-008 *
0.1558 0.1558 -0.0289 0.0779 -0.0289 -0.0000 -0.0289 -0.0000
0.1558 0.3116 -0.0577 0.1558 -0.0577 -0.0000 -0.0577 -0.0000
-0.0289 -0.0577 0.0219 0.0005 0.0213 0.0577 0.0211 0.0289
0.0779 0.1558 0.0005 0.1568 -0.0000 0.1558 -0.0005 0.0779
-0.0289 -0.0577 0.0213 0.0000 0.0215 0.0577 0.0213 0.0289
0.0000 0.0000 0.0577 0.1558 0.0577 0.3116 0.0577 0.1558
-0.0289 -0.0577 0.0211 -0.0005 0.0213 0.0577 0.0219 0.0289
0.0000 0.0000 0.0289 0.0779 0.0289 0.1558 0.0289 0.1558
>> a11=0.1558* 10^ -8;a22=0.3116* 10^ -8;
a33=0.0219* 10^ -8;a44=0.1568* 10^ -8;
a55=0.0215* 10^ -8;a66=0.3116* 10^ -8;
a77=0.0219* 10^ -8;a88=0.1558* 10^ -8;
m=657.625* b^ 2;g=39.65* d^ 2;m1=2* g;
m2=m+g;m3=0.61* m;m4=2* m+453.44;
m5=1.22* m;m6=m+g;m7=0.61* m;m8=2* g;
w =1/ sqr t (a11* m1+a22* m2+a33* m3+a44* m4+a55* m5+a66* m6+a77* m7+a88* m8)
w =
303.0862
Wi t h t he choi ce of J = 0.1m onJ b = 0.3m made, a si mi l ar M ATLAB pr ogr am gi ves an accept abl e val ue of nat ur al f r equency as
n
= 566roJ/ s.
M ODAL ANALYSI S
The equat i on of mot i on of t he compl et e syst em i n nat ur al r esponse i s expr essed as
M
t
U
+ K
t
U = . ( 6 . o)
If har monic exci t at i on i s assumed of t he syst em an Ei gen-value pr obl em r esul t s t hus
( K
t
2
M
t
) U = . . ( 6. b)
Post -mul t i pl ying equat i on(5.b) w i t h M
t
-1
gi ves
(K
t
M
t
-1
2
I)U = . . ( 6. c)
The char act er i st i c equat i on i s
|K
t
M
t
-1
2
I| = . . ( 6. J)
It i s impli ed f r om equat i on(6.c) t hat t he eigen-val ues of t he mat r i x K
t
M
t
-1
ar e t he squar ed val ues of t he nat ur al f r equenci es of t he syst em. By
maki ng use of t he design val ues J = 0.1m onJ b = 0.3m i n t he mat r i x K
t
M
t
-1
f or med f r om equat i ons(5.a and 5.b), M ATLAB pr ogr am as
di spl ayed bel ow gives t he modal mat r i x V and di agonal mat r i x of ei gen-val ues D ;
>> d=0.1;b=0.3;a=64179.31241* 10^ 6* d^ 2;e=7005.798913* 10^ 6* b^ 4;m=657.625* b^ 2;g=39.65* d^ 2;K=[ 2* a -1* a 0 0 0 0 0 0;-1* a a+12* e 16.2* e -
12* e 16.2* e 0 0 0;0 16.2* e 29.16* e -16.2* e 14.58* e 0 0 0;0 -12* e -16.2* e 24* e 0 -12* e 16.2* e 0;0 16.2* e 14.58* e 0 58.32* e -16.2* e 14.58* e 0;0
0 0 -12* e -16.2* e a+12* e -16.2* e -1* a;0 0 0 16.2* e 14.58* e -16.2* e 29.16* e 0;0 0 0 0 0 -1* a 0 2* a] ;M =[ 2* g 0 0 0 0 0 0 0;0 m+g 0 0 0 0 0 0;0 0
0.61* m 0 0 0 0 0;0 0 0 2* m+453.4 0 0 0 0;0 0 0 0 1.22* m 0 0 0; 0 0 0 0 0 m+g 0 0;0 0 0 0 0 0 0.61* m 0;0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2* g] ;[ V,D] =ei g(K* M ^ -1)
V =
-0.6311 0.6311 -0.0021 -0.0022 -0.0002 0.0042 0.0044 0.0000
0.3189 -0.3189 -0.2936 -0.3160 -0.0372 0.6303 0.6528 0.0000
0.0032 -0.0031 -0.3714 -0.4844 -0.0227 -0.2600 -0.1569 0.4082
-0.0000 0.0046 -0.0000 0.5753 -0.9981 -0.2649 -0.0000 -0.0000
0.0063 0.0000 -0.7428 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -0.3138 -0.8165
-0.3189 -0.3189 0.2936 -0.3160 -0.0372 0.6303 -0.6528 -0.0000
0.0032 0.0031 -0.3714 0.4844 0.0227 0.2600 -0.1569 0.4082
0.6311 0.6311 0.0021 -0.0022 -0.0002 0.0042 -0.0044 -0.0000
D =
1.0e+009 *
1.6241 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 1.6241 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0.0809 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0.0578 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0.0004 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0.0068 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0046 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0229
As st at ed ear l ier t he el ement s of t he mat r i x D ar e t he squar es of t he nat ur al f r equenci es of t he syst em. The f undament al nat ur al f r equency of t he
syst em coul d be seen f r om t he small est el ement of D as
n
= 0.0004 10
9
2
roJ/ s = 632roJ/ s w hi ch i s seen t o be cl ose t o t he Dunker ley
nat ur al f r equency of
n
= 566roJ/ s. The di scr epancy i s at t r i but abl e t o t he appr oximat i on i nvolvi ng t he Dunker l ey pr i nci ple.
When t he nat ur al f r equencies ar e non-zer o and di st i nct al l modal vect or s ar e li near l y i ndependent . A set of n l i near l y independent vect or s f or m a
basi s f or an n-dimensi onal vect or space and any ar bi t r ar y vect or in t he space i s a li near combi nat i on of t he basi s[ 3,6,7] . Unf or t unat el y degener acy
exi st s i n t he syst em r esponse as a r esul t of r epet i t i on of t he eigen-val ue 1.6241 10
9
as seen f r om t he mat r i x D never t heless t he mode
shapes can pl ot t ed f r om t he modal mat r i x V.
CONCLUDI NG COM M ENTS
St at i c and dynami c r equi r ement s ar e meet by t he choice J = 0.1m onJ b = 1.25m and t he pr obl em of r esonance dur i ng st ar t -up i s pr ecl uded
si nce t he nat ur al f r equency of t he syst em i s hi gher t han t he exci t at i on f r equency due t o unbal ance. For bet t er mat er ial economy i t i s suggest ed
t hat smal l er val ues of b t hat sat i sf y t he desi gn speci f icat i ons be desi gned. For exampl e J = 0.1m onJ b = 0.3m t hen
n
= 566roJ/ s meet t he
desi gn speci f icat i on.
REFERENCES
1 S. G. Kel l y, M echani cal Vibr at ions: Schaum s Out li ne Ser i es, M cGr aw -Hi ll ,1996, p.274.
2 S. S. Rao, M echani cal Vi brat ions(4
t h
ed.),Dor l i ng Ki nder sley, Indi a, 2004.
3 V. John, Int r oduct ion t o Engi neeri ng M at eri al s(3
r d
ed.), Pal gr ave, Hampshi r e, 1992, p.3.
4 A. Pyt el and F. L. Si nger , St r engt h of M at er ial s(4
t h
ed.), Replika Pr ess l t d 100% EOU,Indi a, pp(388-393).
5 R. J. Ashl ey, Fi ni t e El ement s in Soli ds and St ruct ur es: An Int roduct ion, Chapman and Hall London.
6 Jami n He and Zhi-Fang Fu, M odal Analysi s, But t er w or t h-Heinemann, Linacr e House, Jor dan Hil l , Oxf or d OX2 8DP, London, 2001.
7 K. F. Ri l ey, M . P. Hobson and S. J. Bence, M at hemat i cal M et hods f or Physi cs and Engi neer i ng(Low Pr ize ed.), Cambr idge Univer si t y Pr ess,
1999, p.185.