Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2 3 4
THOMAS A. LAMB a Resident of the State of Alaska, acting as pro se, Plaintiff,
OBAMA,
13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Defendats
NOTICE TO THE COURT OF RECIEPT OF RESPONSE FROM HAWAII ATTORNEY GENERAL ON VERIFICATION OF AMENDED BIRTH CERTIFICATE
Plaintiff Thomas A. Lamb (Plaintiff herein) continues to file notices 1 to the court.
The Plaintiff files this notice to continue to impeach the credibility of allegations that Barack Obama was not adopted or an Indonesian citizen; who at one time was referred to by the
Fr ie nd
26 27 28
General of Hawaii (Attorney General herein) on the Plaintiffs request for verification of an amended birth certificate of Defendant Barack Obama. The date of the response is December
27th, 2012. See Exhibit A. The Hawaii Statute that the Attorney General cites 2, pertains to only records that exist.
name Barry Soetoro and did not hold a Kenyan citizenship. On January 3 1, 2013 the Plaintiff via the USPS, received a response from the Attorney
of
Th eF og bo w. co m
VW' Case No.: 3AN-12-09464-CI ) ) ) )
Thomas A. Lamb 2806 Howe Place #1 Anchorage, Alaska 99517 E-mail: tlamb775@aol.com Telephone: 907-306-5855
3 4
5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Moreover, the Attorney General's interpretation of the Hawaii Statute conflicts with state due process laws in Alaska and other states that allow pro se litigants to litigated in court.
Given the Attorney General's interpretation on non-attorneys not having a direct and
tangible interest under Section 338-18(g) (4), the Attorney General's interpretation is a direct attack on the due process rights of pro se litigants.
If apro se litigant were involved in a paternity case against him in Alaska and a
certificate of live birth of a child named Barack Obama from Hawaii was introduced in the
Alaska Superior Court without verification of the certificate of live birth, the Attorney General's interpretation of the Hawaii statute would deny the pro se litigant the ability to verify the
authenticity of what becomes a hearsay document without official verification of the document.
Arguably there are more legal scenarios that could come into play where apro se litigant in an Alaska court or a court in another state would be denied due process by the Attorney General's interpretation of the Hawaii Statue relied on. Moreover, if a student from Hawaii was enrolled in an Alaskan school and there is
Fr ie nd
26 27 28
School for the Deaf is enrolled under the name Barack Obama but previous school records show
that his name was Barry Soetoro, the Alaska Department of Education would be denied the authorization to verify the existence of a record of a name change or amended certificate of live
records proffered to the Alaska Department of Education that the student enrolled in the Alaska
of
Th eF og bo w. co m
338-18 Disclosure of records. (a) To protect the integrity of vital statistics records, to ensure their proper use, and to ensure the efficient and proper administration of the vital statistics system, it shall be unlawful for any person to permit inspection of, or to disclose information contained in vital statistics records, or to copy or issue a copy of all or part of any such record, except as authorized by this part or by rules adopted by the department of health. (emphasis added)
The Attorney General takes one last step by saying "nor any other legal authority, entitles
3 4
The Attorney General when stating you, this means all pro se litigants and all state agencies.
5
6 7
Moreover, the State of Hawaii in effect is saying it is above the Full Faith and Credit
Clause when it comes to respecting due process laws, issued orders, civil rules on evidence and hearsay documents in Alaska and other states.
Their law with regard to disclosure of public records is supreme to all other laws of other
9
states.
10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
testimony in other court proceedings that Barack Obama was not adopted. An amended birth certificate lends credence to the school record that listed Barack Obama as Barry Soetoro by virtue of an adoption and became an Indonesian citizen in Indonesia.
In previous court proceedings dealing with Barack Obama's eligibility, 3 an application for an extension of a passport of Barack Obama's mother was introduced as evidence. On the passport, the name Barack Hussein Obama (Soebarkah) is listed but crossed out.
Also noted is Barack Obama's mother indicated that she was going to live in Indonesian indefinitely because she was married to an Indonesian.
crossing out the name with the added surname Soebarkah to Barack Obama's name. However, in researching the name Soebarkah, this is considered a legal surname of Indonesians.
Fr ie nd
26 27 28
Department of Justice made a misrepresentation of material fact that "to the extent this paragraph
Soetoro-Passport-Application-File-Strunk-v-Dept-of-State-FOIA-Release-FIN AL-7-29- 10 (last visited January 6th, 2013) I See paragraph 20 http://www.scribd.com/doc/20704651/ALLEN-v-SOETOR0-14-ANSWERto-l-Complaint-by-Hi nary-CI inton-Eric-Holder-Janet-Napolitano-Barry-S oetoro-U-SCitizenship-and-Immigration-Servic (last visited January 7th, 2013)
Amended Lawsliit Mama- 3
In another case that challenged the eligibility of Barack Obama, 4 the attorney for the
of
Since Barack Obama's mother is dead, it is hard to say what was being done with
Th eF og bo w. co m
alleges that President Obama is not a natural-born citizen of the United States, or is or ever was a
3
4 5 6
In arguendo, if the Department of Justice were to be correct that Barack Obama was never adopted, then he would have held a dual citizenship from the time of birth until 1983.
Thus twice, the Department of Justice has made a misrepresentation of a material fact to
7 8 9 10
citizen.
If Barack Obama claimed he was a foreign student in college, then there are the questions of fraud or in the alternative, did he renounce his U.S. citizenship as an adult?
Those are questions that can be answered through this lawsuit by reviewing Barack Obama's actual birth records and eventually, Barack Obama's college records. To the Plaintiff's knowledge, there is no known case where an actual copy of Barack Obama's birth certificate has been entered in a court proceeding.
11 12 13
14
All litigation with regard to Barack Obama's eligibility, has been based on a document posted on the internet and the information of the document being verified in court.
15
16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24
he in effect by claiming to be a foreign student, renounced his U.S. citizenship, then the Plaintiff can take the evidence and present it to both the Alaska Legislature and Congress for it is the role
And Congress can be petitioned to take action if indeed it is found Barack Obama renounced his U.S. citizenship by enrolling himself in college as a foreign student.
Fr
ie
nd
the Plaintiff upon the request of the case manager with the Alaska Supreme Court sent a Notice to the Court indicating that an amended copy of the complaint and a summons were sent to Barack Obama and Mitt Romney restricted delivery. A copy of the restricted delivery receipts were included with the Notice of the Court as an exhibit.
25
26
27 28
See State Department Confirms Obama Dual Citizenship http://www.wnd.com/2010/081195441/ (last visited January 7th 2013)
Amended Lawsuit Mama- 4
As for the Alaska Supreme Court rendering the Plaintiff's Petition of Review as moot:
of
of the Congress and the Alaska Legislature to enact laws that safeguard the voting process.
Th
eF
og bo
w.
the courts. i.e. Barack Obama never practiced the Muslim faith and he was never was a Kenyan
co
5
1
2 3 4 5 6 7
8
It is the request of the Plaintiff that this Court on its own motion, clarify that proper
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
The undersigned certifies that on this 7111 day of January, 2012 I caused a copy of the foregoing to be served by First Class USPS mail to the following parties known address: Barack Obama 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. Northwest Washington D.C. 20500
Cc:
Fr ie nd
26 27 28
s
Amended T.ausuit Ohm- 5
of
Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court Chief Justice of the Alaska Supreme Court Rep. Don Young (907) 271-5950 Alaska Attorney General 907-465-2075 Governor Sean Parnell Fax 269-7461 Rep. Lindsey Holmes - Representative_Lindsey_Holmes@legis.state.ak.us
Th eF og bo w. co m
7>
T1Nrm.'s A Lamb
.--`
December 27, 2012 Thomas A. Lamb 2806 Howe Place #1 Anchorage, Alaska 99517 Dear Mr. Lamb:
ie
nd
(2) The section you cited only allows verification of a record which is already part of legal proceedings. Your request is to determine "the existence" of a record, rather than a request for a verification of a record which actually exists and is part of your legal proceedings. Thus, your request is not one which is contemplated by section 338-18(g)(4), Hawaii Revised Statutes. (3) Based on your described facts, neither section 338-18, Hawaii Revised Statutes, nor any other legal authority, entitles you to the verification you have requested. Very truly yours,
of
(1) The section you cited as authority only allows verification to private or government attorneys, and not non-attorneys. I understand that you are representing yourself in the case you referenced, but nevertheless, you are only "acting" as an attorney. Section 338-18(g)(4), Hawaii Revised Statutes, does not allow the Department of Health to provide you with verification of a record to which you do not have a direct and tangible interest.
Th
The Department of the Attorney General of the State of Hawaii received a copy of your request for verification of a vital record which you sent to Director Fuddy of the Hawaii Department of Health. Because I represent the Vital Records Section of the Department of Health, your request was referred to me. You claim to be entitled to a verification of a Hawaii vital record pursuant to the authority of section 338-18(g)(4), Hawaii Revised Statutes. I disagree and have advised my client that it cannot comply with your request for the following reasons:
Fr
486170_1
eF
-7'
og bo
w.
co