You are on page 1of 1

Australians Eat Lunch on the Go

With increasing time pressures, working Australians are less likely to bring lunch from home,
and eating at the desk or skipping lunch altogether is the reality for many.

Too busy to make lunch, too busy to eat lunch Expectation inflation
Around 90% of people purchase their lunch at least once a week While 98% of those surveyed believe that employers must provide
and 52% choose to buy their lunch at least half of the time. Also, at least tea, coffee and biscuits, there is a growing expectation that
nearly 60% of respondents admitted to sometimes skipping lunch employers should provide more. Over 40% of those surveyed stated
altogether with around 1 in 6 doing so frequently. that employers should also stock the staffroom with:
• Breakfast cereals
“Despite the promises of the 1980’s that with all of the new labour • Morning tea muffins, pastries etc
saving devices we’d be working fewer hours, the reality is that • Fruit and other snacks
we’re working longer” states the researcher Mark McCrindle. “1 in 4 • Spreads and bread
Australians works more than 50 hours a week and when you add in • Coffee machine
travel times, packing a lunch from home has been squeezed out of
most Australians’ schedule. Only 4% take a lunch from home each “Many employers baulk at spending money to stock a
day.” staffroom with food and equipment for employees. However
any saving may prove to be a false economy” stated Mark
To buy or not to buy McCrindle. “With annual voluntary turnover in Australia today
Workers are giving into convenience at lunchtime every week now exceeding 13%, a relatively small investment in kitchen
mainly because “it’s quicker to get less healthy options.” Though facilities and staff room catering can lead to significant
convenience is the dominant factor, many employees also cited savings through staff wellbeing, productivity, and improved
that the variety offered from purchasing their lunch was also very staff retention.”
important. In an average week, more than half (54%) said they
spent over $20 on lunches. Meanwhile, nearly 1 in 10 spent $60 or More than a kettle
more. This figure effectively translates into at least $3000 over the At least 2 in 3 workers expect their employer to provide not just a
span of a year. kettle, but also a fridge, microwave, water dispenser and toaster.

“There is financial stress on many today but this is trumped Staff kitchens: The key to attraction and retention
by the stress and complexity of daily life” Mark McCrindle More than two-thirds of workers say that a well-equipped staff
said. “The average full time worker spends $1400 per year on kitchen would either attract them to a new job or influence them to
lunches while 10% spend over $3000 per year.” stay longer with their current employer. Several respondents even
commented that such provisions were likely to contribute positively
Cafés trump big franchises their health, reduce tardiness, and inspire loyalty to a company that
While 1 in 5 can’t keep away from the big name franchises, the demonstrates an interest in their overall well-being.
proportion of workers who regularly opted to visit the local café/
takeaway instead was double this figure (41%). Source: McCrindle Research
Research method: Focus groups and a survey of 600 people from
Destination: Desk online panel www.australiaspeaks.com
Of all the possible destinations, the most common place to eat lunch
is at the work desk (28%). This was more than double the amount
About the Author
of people who made an effort to eat outdoors.
Mark McCrindle is a full member of the Australian
Leftovers versus lunches Market and Social Research Society and accredited
with their highest qualification: Qualified Practicing
2 in 3 workers are relying on leftovers for lunch at least once per Market Researcher. He is bound by the AMSRS
week. In contrast, when pre-prepared meals are taken to work, 83% ethics, privacy, and professional charter.
make the lunch themselves whereas 9% depend on their spouse to
Mark McCrindle
do it for them.
MA, BSc. (Psychology), AMSRS, QPMR

© 2007 McCrindle Research www.mccrindle.com.au

You might also like