Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Megan Voegele
Mrs. Hackett
Exploratory Analysis
2/1/2009
The infamous Harry Potter series has drawn more than 400 million eyes to its pages
since its release in 1997. There are few books that parallel the teen literature’s
popularity, and like any figurehead, Harry has become a target. Fundamentalist
Christians stand poised and ready to hurl the novels into the fire pit, laying a very serious
charge upon the writer herself: Joanne Kathleen Rowling. Her crime? Leading children
into the devil’s arms with a detailed witchery instruction manual, of course. Today, the
In September of 2005, Laura Mallory became the face of this assault when she
pressed for the books to be banned from her children’s public school library. This was
claimed on the grounds that they violated the separation of church and state by promoting
the Wicca religion. She has never read any of the books, but is absolutely positive they
contain "evil themes, witchcraft, demonic activity, murder, evil blood sacrifice, spells and
teaching children all of this."(Mallory). In general, Christians are divided on the issue.
Some believe that the novels are harmless and “in good fun”. Those that side with
The criticism is understandable, considering that Harry and his friends wave
Voegele 2
wands, mutter Latin incantations, stir potions and turn into animals. Christians worry that
children are too small to clearly distinguish reality from fantasy, and that they will get
swept away with the spell of the story. Even if the child understands what fiction is,
there remains the concern that he will be influenced by the novels in a subtle way. It is
the same reasoning that parents use to restrict their children from befriending
interview released after Deathly Hallows, Rowling revealed that one of her characters,
the beloved Albus Dumbledore, was a homosexual. This caused quite a stir in the
Christian community. Extremist parents conclude that Rowling’s disclosure only slaps
the seal of evil on novels already full of satanic ideals. The announcement shouldn’t
really be relevant anyway, since there was no mention of it in the books, and thus
The same ones who would cast Potter into the ashes would also have Twilight, the
Ann Rice novels, and various other controversial books banned. Fundamentalists argue
that vampires and witches have no place in this world, and only lead America’s young
down the immoral path of no return. They are the fuel behind banned books of the world.
They are a minority, but a powerful minority at that. Most Christians do not want to
disrupt the ways of the country, and simply want the right to expose their children to the
things they wish. More vociferous crusaders like Mallory yearn for something more.
They seek the destruction of fantastical thought on a distorted accusation. The motivation
to destroy doesn’t stem from malice: it stems from fear. For some, it stems from
attention-seeking goals. When one looks beyond the radicalism, the issue at heart is
Voegele 3
whether books viewed as a danger should be allowed on the shelves. What must be
I absolutely did not start writing these books to encourage any child into
witchcraft. I'm laughing slightly because to me, the idea is absurd. I have met
thousands of children and not even one time has a child come up to me and said,
“Ms Rowling, I'm so glad I've read these books because now I want to be a
witch.” (Rowling.)
worse than if I said I thought there was no God. Every time I've been asked if I
believe in God, I've said yes, because I do, but no one ever really has gone any
more deeply into it than that, and I have to say that does suit me, because if I talk
too freely about that I think the intelligent reader, whether 10 or 60, will be able to
JK Rowling clearly had no intention of writing witch craft for children, and has no
experience with Wicca. Her spell incantations derive from her background in
mythology and Latin. Her autobiography, JK Rowling: The Wizard Behind Harry Potter
, describes her history of picking out funny-looking names, and her love of the odd and
delightful. For Rowling, the magic was a plot device used to weave the true substance:
Rowling was careful not to color her story with any one religion, but the avid
reader could argue there are a few sections that cry, “Christian allegory!” For example,
one scene entails Harry facing an evil spirit in the Chamber of Secrets, Lord Voldemort.
In this theoretical allegory, Voldemort is the Satan figure, and Dumbledore is the Christ
figure. Harry counts on Dumbledore for help while he rescues the young Ginny Weasley
from a sure death. In Deathly Hallows, it could be argued that Harry is also a Christ
figure because he willingly sacrifices his life for the good of the world.
Even if JK Rowling didn’t intend the books to lead children to evil, fundamentalists
could still argue that they did anyway. There are no statistics to support or deny a
Harry-Potter-driven rise in Wicca. However, Potter clearly did increase the amount
of readers in the world. With an audience of nearly 400 million, the books are translated
into 67 different languages. Many children will say that their journey into literature
began with the Harry Potter novels, and that it has encouraged them to read other tales. It
goes without saying that a series that transforms a child from not reading any books at all
If the fundamentalist crusade won this debate and managed to ban all Potter
books, it is amusing to think that Rowling would probably smile. After all, in Order of
the Phoenix , the loathed Professor Umbridge bans a magazine that contains Harry’s
interview and his truth. It has a chaotic effect. Instead of keeping the magazine out of the
school, the students smuggle it in and read it out of curiosity. Banning the magazine was
the worst thing Umbridge could have done, because it stoked the intrigue more. In the
same way, if controversial books are hushed, they will kindle in the fire of rebellion and
spread further than ever. Let us not forget that if Potter gets the axe, so should the
Voegele 5
Chronicles of Narnia and Macbeth. They too contain witches, but no one seems to think
Though fundamentalist concerns are valid and mostly of good intent, the populace
should weigh this against the fruits that the Potter novels have produced. Children are
not as gullible and mindless as those activists would paint them. It is possible to
distinguish fiction from reality. When Rowling set pen to paper, she sought
entertainment instead of fame, and wrote a strapping tale that spanned the life of a boy
and his decisions. She didn’t want to write about witches and wizards: she wanted to
Works Cited
Associated Press. “Georgia Mom Seeks Ban on Harry Potter.” MSNBC. 4 October 2006.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15127464/#storyContinued
Bowyer, Jeff. “Harry Potter and the Fire Breathing Fundamentalists.” Town Hall. 18
August 2007. http://townhall.com/columnists/default.aspx
Rowling, JK. Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets. United States: Scholastic, 1999.
Rowling, JK. Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows. United States: Scholastic, 2007.
Rowling, JK. Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix. United States: Scholastic, 2003.
Shapiro, Marc. JK Rowling: The Wizard Behind Harry Potter. United States: St Martin’s
Press, 2000.
Wyman, Max.. “You Can Lead A Fool to a Book but you Can’t Make Them Think.”
Accio Quote! 26 October 2000. http://www.accio-quote.org/articles/2000/1000-
vancouversun-wyman.htm