Professional Documents
Culture Documents
\
|
= o
(...) A
(...) B
tan a ... e and
( )
|
|
.
|
\
|
= o
(...) D
(...) C
tan a ... i
The OR rigidity is noted KKe and the IR rigidity
is noted as KKi. The two parameters (KKe and KKi)
are functions of the rings width (W), length (L) and the
thickness (G). According to the material resistance
theory in a bending case:
e , i e , i
3
e , i e , i
e , i
I . E . 3
L . Qr
z = A , hence
e , i e , i e , i
KK . z Qr A = . Using the Hertz relations between
load and deformation, the equilibrium equations are:
( ) ( ) ( )
( ) ( ) ( )
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
( ) ( ) ( )
o o =
o o o o =
A o o =
A o o =
A A =
QA ... i sin ... i . Kpi 0
... e sin ... e . Kei ... i sin ... i . Kpi 0
zi . KKi ... i cos ... i . Kpi 0
ze . KKe ... e cos ... e . Kpe 0
zi . KKi ze . KKe 0
5 . 1
5 . 1 5 . 1
5 . 1
5 . 1
where: QA represents the axial load; Qr
i,e
represents the
radial component of the normal contact load; Kpe and
Kpi are the contact rigidity ball-raceways corresponding
to the OR and IR rings respectively.
NUMERICAL EXAMPLES FOR A SECTION
To show the PQs evoution as function of the REE
the following input parameters were considered:
Structure type 4PCBB-24
Radial clearance Jd 0 mm
Ball diameter Dw 5 mm
Axial Load Qa 20 N
Initial contact angle
o
0 deg
Radial displacement or 0
Virtual pitch diameter Dm 1000
To approximate the KK
i,e
parameters the OR and
IR widths are equals with Dw and the OR and IR
lengths are equals with 20 mm. The variable parameters
in analisys are the raceways thickness and the
conformities, according to Table 1. For all cases form
Table 1 the IR height variation is between [315] mm.
Table 1. Variable uses in the analysis.
Case GE, mm f
1 15 0,52
2 15 0,55
3 5 0,52
4 5 0,55
Figures 3 to 6 show the evolution of the PQs as
function of REE.
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
3 5 7 9 11 13 15
GE=5, f=0.55
GE=15, f=0.55
GE=5, f=0.52
GE=15, f=0.52
Fig 3. Load contact versus IR heigth [N and mm]
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
3 5 7 9 11 13 15
GE=5, f=0.55
GE=15, f=0.55
GE=5, f=0.52
GE=15, f=0.52
Fig. 4. Contact angle versus IR heigth, [deg and mm]
7+($11$/62)81,9(56,7<'815($'(-262)*$/$,
FASCICLE VIII, TRIBOLOGY 2011 (XVII) Issue 2
ISSN 1221-4590
61
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
3 5 7 9 11 13 15
GE=5, f=0.55
GE=15, f=0.55
GE=5, f=0.52
GE=15, f=0.52
Fig. 5. oa evolution versus IR heigth [mm and mm]
-0.005
0
0.005
0.01
0.015
0.02
0.025
0.03
0.035
0.04
0.045
3 5 7 9 11 13 15
GE=5, f=0.55
GE=15, f=0.55
GE=5, f=0.52
GE=15, f=0.52
Fig. 6. Azi evolution versus IR heigth, [mm and mm]
Fig. 7. Profiled slewing rings
C.ZT - series C.DI- series
C.DE- series U.ND- series
7+($11$/62)81,9(56,7<'815($'(-262)*$/$,
FASCICLE VIII, TRIBOLOGY 2011 (XVII) Issue 2
ISSN 1221-4590
62
U.DI- series 2U.ND- series
2U.DI series
Fig. 8.
The mathematical model is used into a complete
code to analysis the SIRCA-RIMA [2] profiled slewing
rings with the shapes presented in figure 7.
That method is useful also for the slewing ring
shapes presented in figure 8.
For these types of profiled slewing rings the
raceway elasticity have to be taken into account.
The raceway elasticity can occur to the non-
hertzian contact.
CONCLUSIONS
The raceway elasticity effects REE have to be
taking into analysis because the ring geometry and the
boundary conditions are modifying the standard
contact parameters. The mathematical model is useful
in the ball and roller bearing analysis.
REFERENCES
1. Rezmires D, 2003, Theoretical and experimental researches
regarding the dynamics of spherical roller bearings, PhD Thesis,
"Gheorghe Asachi" Technical University of Iasi.
2. SIRCA S.A Slewing Rings General Catalogue
ED2010/AM-DR, available online at www.sirca.com.ro