ENVIRONMENTAL PROPAGANDA...

The change in terminology from "global warming" to "climate change" is not a change in methodology.
It is a change in psychology to keep pace with growing awareness of the propaganda schemes
surrounding the "global warming" hype. There is plenty of documentation in print and video from
unbiased scientists (ones not paid by the "global warming" propaganda fiasco) who explain that the
science of the earth's warming and cooling cycles are due to solar activity. The greater the activity on
the sun the greater or longer the warming trend THROUGHOUT the entire solar system. The lesser the
activity on the sun the lesser or shorter the cooling trend THROUGHOUT the entire solar system. Any
global warming (or cooling) and any climate change on earth (including increases in hurricanes and
earthquakes) are due mainly to H.A.A.R.P. (High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program) and
related though differently named, but collaborated programs, throughout the earth. In addition
chemtrail 'clouds' affect weather as well.

The above is an addition (or clarification) written in response to a section in the following
article/definition from Wikipedia entitled, “Republican Party (United States)” from the sub-heading,
“Environmental policies” which is pasted below:

Environmental policies
Some Republicans are skeptical of anthropogenic global warming and question scientific studies on the
impact of human activity on climate change, instead asserting that global warming is part of "natural"
cyclical phenomenon, or caused by a number of other alternative theories.[citation needed] This is
slowly changing due to more scientific research and increasing pressure from the international
community, and in July 2008 the Bush administration acknowledged, at least in principle, the need to
act on the issue of climate change.[citation needed] John McCain, the Republican nominee for
president in 2008, is a strong advocate of legislation to regulate the emission of greenhouse gases into
the atmosphere.

(Then my addition is, now, mentioned in this location of the article. The remainder of this sub-
heading's review follows.)

Historically, the Republican Party has made several contributions to the protection of the environment.
Republican President Theodore Roosevelt was a prominent conservationist whose policies eventually
led to the creation of the modern U.S. National Park Service.[22] Also, President Richard Nixon was
responsible for establishing the Environmental Protection Agency in 1970.[23] More recently,
California Republican Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, with the support of 16 other states, sued the
Federal Government and the United States Environmental Protection Agency for the right to set vehicle
emission standards higher than the Federal Standard,[24] a right to which California is entitled under
the Clean Air Act.
On the other hand, President George W. Bush has publicly opposed ratification of the Kyoto Protocols
on the grounds that they unfairly targeted Western industrialized nations such as the United States
while giving developing Global South polluters such as China and India a pass.[25]
In 2000, the Republican Party adopted as part of its platform support for the development of market-
based solutions to environmental problems. According to the platform, "economic prosperity and
environmental protection must advance together, environmental regulations should be based on
science, the government’s role should be to provide market-based incentives to develop the
technologies to meet environmental standards, we should ensure that environmental policy meets the
needs of localities, and environmental policy should focus on achieving results processes."[26]
Although this platform was created for the Republican National Convention, emphasis on these issues
within the Republican Party has diminished in the past few years.[27]
The Bush administration,[28] along with several of the candidates that sought the Republican
Presidential nomination in 2008,[29][30][31] supported increased Federal investment into the
development of clean alternative fuels, and environmentally unsound fuels such as ethanol, as a way of
helping the U.S. achieve energy independence, as opposed to supporting less use of carbon dioxide-
producing methods of generating energy. McCain supports the cap-and-trade policy, a policy that is
quite popular among Democrats but much less so among other Republicans. Most Republicans support
increased oil drilling in currently protected areas such as the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, a
position that has drawn sharp criticism from many environmental activists.

“1.” to “7” (below) correspond to “25” through “31” (above).

1. ^ Bush, George W. (2001-03-13).
[http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2001/03/20010314.html "TexProxy-Connection:
keep-alive Cache-Control: max-age=0 of a Letter from the President"].
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2001/03/20010314.html. Retrieved on 2007-11-09.
2. ^ "Encourage Market-Based Solutions to Environmental Problems". OnTheIssues. 2000-08-12.
3. ^ Paul Rauber (2006 May-June). "Elephant graveyard - how the Republican Party is handling
environmental issues". Sierra.
4. ^ "Fact Sheet: Harnessing the Power of Technology for a Secure Energy Future". 2007-02-22.
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2007/02/20070222-2.html. Retrieved on 2007-11-09.
5. ^ Kudlow & Company (2007-03-26). "Interview with Rudy Giuliani".
http://www1.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2007/03/interview_with_rudy_giuliani_1.html.
Retrieved on 2007-11-09.
6. ^ "Issue Watch: Achieving Energy Independence". http://www.mittromney.com/Issue-
Watch/Energy. Retrieved on 2007-11-09.
7. ^ "The Candidates: Rep. Duncan Hunter". Washington Post.com. 2007-10-12.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-
dyn/content/discussion/2007/10/01/DI2007100101460.html. Retrieved on 2007-11-09.

(COMPOSED AND COMPILED BY 'Fire Fly in the Dark' or Gord Zaretzki)