Professional Documents
Culture Documents
I.
Justice Holmes once said: The power to tax is not the power to destroy while this Court (the Supreme Court) sits. Describe the power to tax and its limitations. (5%) SUGGESTED ANSWER: The power to tax is an inherent power of the sovereign which is exercised through the legislature, to impose burdens upon subjects and objects within its jurisdiction for the purpose of raising revenues to carry out the legitimate objects of government. The underlying basis for its exercise is governmental necessity for without it no government can exist or endure. Accordingly, it has the broadest scope of all the powers of government because in the absence of limitations, it is considered as unlimited, plenary, comprehensive and supreme. The two limitations on the power of taxation are the inherent and constitutional limitations which are intended to prevent abuse on the exercise of the otherwise plenary and unlimited power. It is the Courts role to see to it that the exercise of the power does not transgress these limitations. II. a) Mr. Pascuals income from leasing his property reaches the maximum rate of tax under the law. He donated one-half of his said property to a non-stock, non-profit educational institution whose income and assets are actually, directly and exclusively used for educational purposes, and therefore qualified for tax exemption under Article XIV, Section 4 (3) of the Constitution and Section 30 (h) of the Tax Code. Having thus transferred a portion of his said asset, Mr. Pascual succeeded in paying a lesser tax on the rental income derived from his property. Is there tax avoidance or tax evasion? Explain. (2%) SUGGESTED ANSWER: There is tax avoidance. Mr. Pascual has exploited a legally permissive alternative method to reduce his income tax by transferring part of his rental income to a tax exempt entity through a donation of one-half of the income producing property. The donation is likewise exempt from the donors tax. The donation is the legal means employed to transfer the incidence of income tax on the rental income. b) An Executive Order was issued pursuant to law granting tax and duty incentives only to businesses and residents within the secured area of the Subic Economic Special Zone, and denying said incentives to those who live within the Zone but outside such secured area. Is the constitution right to equal protection of the law violated by the Executive Order? Explain. (3%) SUGGESTED ANSWER: No. Equal protection of the law clause is subject to reasonable classification. Classification, to be valid, must (1) rest on substantial distinctions, (2) be germane to the purpose of the law, (3) not be limited to existing conditions only, (4) apply equally to all members of the same class. There are substantial differences between big investors being enticed to the secured area and the business operators outside that are in accord with the equal protection clause that does not require territorial uniformity of laws. The classification applies equally to all the resident individuals and businesses within the secured area.
TAXATION
TAXATION
TAXATION
TAXATION
TAXATION
TAXATION
SUGGESTED ANSWER: The value of the gross estate of a non-resident decedent who is a Filipino citizen at the time of his death shall be determined by including the value at the time of his
TAXATION
SUGGESTED ANSWER: The gross estate shall be determined by including the value at the time of his death all of the properties mentioned, to the extent of the interest he had at the time of his death because he is a Filipino citizen. [Section 85 (A), NIRC of 1997] With respect to the life insurance proceeds, the amount includible in the gross estate for Philippine tax purposes would be to the extent of the amount receivable by the estate of the deceased, his executor, or administrator, under policies taken out by decedent upon his own life, irrespective of whether or not the insured retained the power of revocation, or to the extent of the amount receivable by any beneficiary designated in the policy of insurance, except when it is expressly stipulated that the designation of the beneficiary is irrevocable. [Section 85 (E), NIRC of 1997] The deductions that may be claimed by the estate are: 1) The actual funeral expenses or in an amount equal to five percent (5%) of the gross estate, whichever is lower, but in no case to exceed two hundred thousand pesos (P200,000). [Section 86 (A) (1) (a), NIRC of 1997] 2) The judicial expenses in the testate or intestate proceedings. [Section 86 (A) (1) 3) The value of the decedent s family home located in Valle Verde, Pasig City in an amount not exceeding one million pesos (P1,000,000), and upon presentation of a certification of the barangay captain of the locality that the same have been the decedents family home. [Section 86 (A) (4), NIRC of 1997] 4) The standard deduction of P1,000,000. [Section 86 (A) (5), NIRC of 1997] 5) Medical expenses incurred within one year from death in an amount not exceeding P500,000. [Section 86 (A) (6), NIRC of 1997] The estate tax return shall be filed within six (6) months from the decedents death [Section 90 (B), NIRC of 1997], provided that the Commissioner of Internal Revenue shall have authority to grant in meritorious cases, a reasonable extension not exceeding thirty (30) days for filing the return. [Section 90 (C), NIRC of 1997] Except in cases where the Commissioner of Internal Revenue otherwise permits, the estate tax return shall be filed with an authorized agent bank, or Revenue District Officer, Collection Officer, or duly authorized Treasurer of Pasig City, the City in which
TAXATION
SUGGESTED ANSWER: The Commissioner of Internal Revenue may abate or cancel a tax liability when: (1) The tax or any portion thereof appears to be unjustly or excessively assessed; or (2) The administration and collection costs involved do not justify the collection of the amount due. [Section 204 (B), NIRC of 1997] XVII. A taxpayer is suspected not to have declared his correct gross income in his return filed for 1997. The examiner requested the Commissioner to authorize him to inquire into the bank deposits of the taxpayer so that he could proceed with the net worth method of investigation to establish fraud. May the examiner be allowed to look into the taxpayers bank deposits? In what cases may the Commissioner or his duly authorized representative be allowed to inquire or look into the bank deposits of a taxpayer? SUGGESTED ANSWER: No, as this would be violative of Republic Act No. 1405, the Bank Deposits Secrecy Law. The Commissioner of Internal Revenue or his duly authorized representative may be allowed to inquire or look into the bank deposits of a taxpayer in the following cases: a) For the Purpose of determining the gross estate of a decedent; b) Where the taxpayer has filed an application for compromise of his tax liability by reason of financial incapacity to pay such tax liability. [Section 6 (F), NIRC of 1997] c) Where the taxpayer has signed a waiver authorizing the Commissioner or his duly authorized representatives to inquire into the bank deposits. XVIII. Describe separately the procedures on the legal remedies under the Tax Code available to an aggrieved taxpayer both at the administrative and judicial levels.
TAXATION
TAXATION
10
SUGGESTED ANSWER: Motion granted. The Court of Tax Appeals has jurisdiction only over decisions of the Commissioner of Customs in cases involving seizure, detention or release of property affected (Section 7, Republic Act No. 1125). There is no decision yet of the Commissioner which is subject to review by the Court of Tax Appeals. ALTERNATIVE ANSWER: Motion is granted. The Court of Tax Appeals has no jurisdiction because there is no decision rendered by the Commissioner of Customs on the seizure and forfeiture case. The taxpayer should have appealed the decision rendered by the Collector within fifteen (15) days from receipt of the decision of Commissioner of Customs. The
TAXATION
11
SUGGESTED ANSWER: No. The legislators intended to divest the Regional Trial Courts of the jurisdiction to replevin a property which is a subject of seizure and forfeiture proceedings for violation of the Tariff and Customs Code otherwise, actions for forfeiture of property for violation of the Customs laws could easily be undermined by the simple device of replevin. (De la Fuente v. De Veyra, et al., 120 SCRA 455) There should be no unnecessary hindrance on the governments drive to prevent smuggling and other frauds upon the Customs. Furthermore, the Regional Trial Court do not have jurisdiction in order to render effective and efficient the collection of import and export duties due the State, which enables the government to carry out the functions it has been instituted to perform. (Jao, et al., Court of Appeals, et al., and a companion case, 249 SCRA 35, 43)
TAXATION
12