You are on page 1of 5

FEBRUARY 7, 2013

BANKING

SECTOR COMMENT

Turkish Banks: Introduction of Supplemental Leverage Ratio Is Credit Positive


Summary Opinion
1

Table of Contents:
SUMMARY OPINION INTRODUCTION OF THE NEW LEVERAGE RATIO IS IN LINE WITH BASEL III INITIATIVES WHOLESALE FUNDING ON THE RISE FOLLOWING STRONG LOAN GROWTH

2 3

On 25 December, the Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey (CBRT) announced that it will introduce a leverage ratio as a supplemental regulatory metric for banks. The measure is credit positive for the Turkish banking system, as it will help ensure that banks remain well capitalised and limit their use of debt financing to fund loan growth. The use of a leverage ratio to supplement risk-weighted capital measures is an element of the global Basel III regulatory framework. In Q3 2012, the banking system implemented the Basel II capital framework with its variety of risk weights for different asset classes and which the Turkish banks have all adopted, thereby using the standardised approach1. However, the ongoing, prolonged period of global market and economic turmoil has shown that regulatory credit-risk weights do not always capture the full risk content of banks assets. Therefore, the use of a single, risk-weighted measure of capital adequacy may be insufficient to assess macro financial risks. The new leverage ratio tries to address or pre-empt this problem. According to our estimates, the banks we rate in Turkey comfortably comply with the new regulatory leverage ratio at present. The CBRTs introduction of the leverage ratio, follows a series of supplemental prudential measures that the Turkish regulators have recently used, including (1) a higher risk weighting for unsecured consumer credits with maturities longer than one year; (2) indebtedness caps on credit-card holders; and (3) higher reserve requirements for short-term funds, amongst others. These regulatory measures aimed to pro-actively limit undue risktaking and ensure the soundness of the banking system during its ongoing period of evolution and growth.

Analyst Contacts:
FRANKFURT +49.69.7073.0700

Arif Bekiroglu +49.69.7073.0773 Assistant Vice President - Analyst arif.bekiroglu@moodys.com Carola Schuler +49.69.7073.0766 Managing Director - Banking carola.schuler@moodys.com

The Basel II regime was rolled out in Turkey in Q3 2012. There is no date set to transition to Basel III, but we understand that systems draft Basel III regulations are planned to be issued in the first half of 2013.

BANKING

Introduction of the new leverage ratio is in line with Basel III initiatives
The proposed leverage ratio in Turkey will be calculated by dividing banks core capital by the sum of their assets and off-balance sheet items, with certain weights. Banks with a leverage ratio below 3.5% will be subject to additional reserve requirements of up to 2%. The threshold will increase to 4% by year-end 2014 and 5% by year-end 2015, and will be implemented from Q4 2013 onwards. Currently, the leverage ratios of the Turkish banks we rate are well above the thresholds and we view the system leverage as low; according to the CBRTs study, the majority of the banks leverage exceeds 7% (see Exhibit 1).
EXHIBIT 1

Distribution of the Leverage Ratio of Systems banks (per CBRTs definition)


18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 L<3 3 L<5 5 L<7 7 L<9 9 L < 11 11 L < 13 13 > L

Source: CBRT

The introduction of a leverage ratio is additionally supported by a sensitivity study the CBRT carried out on the Turkish banking system. The CBRTs base scenario assumed a 10% growth in shareholders equity and 15% in on- and off-balance sheet assets, while the CBRTs higher-risk scenario assumed 10% and 25% growth respectively, which results in leverage ratios of 6.5x and 4.8x, respectively for the system in 2015. The higher-risk scenario would result in an average system leverage ratio, for 2015 below the 5x minimum requirement and would trigger steps by the CBRT to counter excessive leverage by applying higher reserve requirements. Based on a simple leverage measure (total assets / Tier 1 capital) used below, which compares across systems, the Turkish banking systems leverage ratio today is currently favorable relative to those of its emerging-market peers (see Exhibit 2). Looking ahead, we expect Turkeys banking system to continue to experience high growth and lower margins. In order to maintain their resilience as the system continues to evolve, of the systems the banks will have to carefully manage and balance their growth strategies and risk discipline with the dual requirements of complying with a Basel II capitalisation ratio and a leverage ratio for the banking system.

FEBRUARY 7, 2013

SECTOR COMMENT: TURKISH BANKS: INTRODUCTION OF SUPPLEMENTAL LEVERAGE RATIO IS CREDIT POSITIVE

BANKING

EXHIBIT 2

Simple Leverage (Tier 1 /total average assets) for rated banks, by system
2008 YE 14% 12% 10% 8% 6% 4% 2% 0% BRAZIL CHINA CZECH REPUBLIC HUNGARY MALAYSIA POLAND RUSSIA TURKEY 2009 YE 2010 YE 2011 YE 2012 H1

Source: Moodys Investors Service

Furthermore, based on the simple leverage ratio and an approximation of the CBRTs parameters, the banks we rate in Turkey comply comfortably with the leverage threshold introduced by Turkish regulators (see Exhibit 3).
Exhibit 3

Consolidated Leverage Ratios for Moodys Rated Turkish Banks (as of Q3 2013)
Moody's Estimated Leverage 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% Simple Leverage

Source: Moodys Investors Service. Note: per consolidated Q3 2012 BRSA financials - Moodys Estimated Leverage = Tier 1 / (total assets + certain off-balance sheet items 2); Simple Leverage = Tier 1 / Total Assets; * non-deposit taking bank; ** formerly named Eurobank Tekfen

Wholesale funding on the rise following strong loan growth


Turkeys GDP has grown by approximately 22% between year-end 2009 and year-end 2012 and we project an additional 3.8% for 2013 and 4% for 2014, which continues to support further expansion of banking intermediation.

Certain Off-Balance Sheet Items = Total Guarantees and warranties + Irrevocable Commitments + 10% Revocable Commitments

FEBRUARY 7, 2013

SECTOR COMMENT: TURKISH BANKS: INTRODUCTION OF SUPPLEMENTAL LEVERAGE RATIO IS CREDIT POSITIVE

BANKING

During that period, the credit growth of the system largely outpaced that of deposits, because of Turkeys lagging savings ratio 3. Deposits are primarily very short-term in the system. The banks therefore resorted to funding credit demand, primarily in domestic currency retail loans, through (1) a higher reliance on wholesale funds which increased to 31% of balance sheet from 25%, and (2) a lower share of liquid assets holdings at 27% of the banks balance sheets from 42%. As a result, the systems loan to deposit ratio increased to 106%, from 81% in 2009. Furthermore, amidst high loan-book growth - which doubled in size (see Exhibit 4 below) - capitalisation metrics for the Turkish banking system have remained sound at a Basel Tier 1 of 14.5 % and a capital adequacy ratio of 16.5%. Nonetheless, they show a declining trend, underpinned by asset growth outpacing the systems internal capital generation, due to the low interest-rate environment (compared with historical levels) and narrower interest margins.
EXHIBIT 4

Turkish Banking System Loan Growth (2005-Q3 2012)


Total SME Loans Housing Loans (right axis) Personal and Other (right axis) Total Retail loans Credit Cards (right axis) Total Corporate Loans Vehicle Loans (right axis)

400.0 350.0 300.0

100.0 80.0 60.0 40.0 20.0 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Q3 2012

Billion TL

250.0 200.0 150.0 100.0 50.0 -

Source: BRSA

Overall, we view systems reliance on wholesale funds as moderate, and believe that the recent regulatory measures will contain the increase in the level of debt financing.

14.9% in 2011 per CBRT

FEBRUARY 7, 2013

SECTOR COMMENT: TURKISH BANKS: INTRODUCTION OF SUPPLEMENTAL LEVERAGE RATIO IS CREDIT POSITIVE

Billion TL

BANKING

Report Number: 148951

Author Arif Bekiroglu

Production Associate Kerstin Thoma

2013 Moodys Investors Service, Inc. and/or its licensors and affiliates (collectively, MOODYS). All rights reserved. CREDIT RATINGS ISSUED BY MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE, INC. (MIS) AND ITS AFFILIATES ARE MOODYS CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND RESEARCH PUBLICATIONS PUBLISHED BY MOODYS (MOODYS PUBLICATIONS) MAY INCLUDE MOODYS CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES. MOODYS DEFINES CREDIT RISK AS THE RISK THAT AN ENTITY MAY NOT MEET ITS CONTRACTUAL, FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS AS THEY COME DUE AND ANY ESTIMATED FINANCIAL LOSS IN THE EVENT OF DEFAULT. CREDIT RATINGS DO NOT ADDRESS ANY OTHER RISK, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: LIQUIDITY RISK, MARKET VALUE RISK, OR PRICE VOLATILITY. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODYS OPINIONS INCLUDED IN MOODYS PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT STATEMENTS OF CURRENT OR HISTORICAL FACT. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODYS PUBLICATIONS DO NOT CONSTITUTE OR PROVIDE INVESTMENT OR FINANCIAL ADVICE, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODYS PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT AND DO NOT PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS TO PURCHASE, SELL, OR HOLD PARTICULAR SECURITIES. NEITHER CREDIT RATINGS NOR MOODYS PUBLICATIONS COMMENT ON THE SUITABILITY OF AN INVESTMENT FOR ANY PARTICULAR INVESTOR. MOODYS ISSUES ITS CREDIT RATINGS AND PUBLISHES MOODYS PUBLICATIONS WITH THE EXPECTATION AND UNDERSTANDING THAT EACH INVESTOR WILL MAKE ITS OWN STUDY AND EVALUATION OF EACH SECURITY THAT IS UNDER CONSIDERATION FOR PURCHASE, HOLDING, OR SALE. ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS PROTECTED BY LAW, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, COPYRIGHT LAW, AND NONE OF SUCH INFORMATION MAY BE COPIED OR OTHERWISE REPRODUCED, REPACKAGED, FURTHER TRANSMITTED, TRANSFERRED, DISSEMINATED, REDISTRIBUTED OR RESOLD, OR STORED FOR SUBSEQUENT USE FOR ANY SUCH PURPOSE, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN ANY FORM OR MANNER OR BY ANY MEANS WHATSOEVER, BY ANY PERSON WITHOUT MOODYS PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. All information contained herein is obtained by MOODYS from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human or mechanical error as well as other factors, however, all information contained herein is provided AS IS without warranty of any kind. MOODY'S adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning a credit rating is of sufficient quality and from sources MOODY'S considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent third-party sources. However, MOODYS is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate information received in the rating process. Under no circumstances shall MOODYS have any liability to any person or entity for (a) any loss or damage in whole or in part caused by, resulting from, or relating to, any error (negligent or otherwise) or other circumstance or contingency within or outside the control of MOODYS or any of its directors, officers, employees or agents in connection with the procurement, collection, compilation, analysis, interpretation, communication, publication or delivery of any such information, or (b) any direct, indirect, special, consequential, compensatory or incidental damages whatsoever (including without limitation, lost profits), even if MOODYS is advised in advance of the possibility of such damages, resulting from the use of or inability to use, any such information. The ratings, financial reporting analysis, projections, and other observations, if any, constituting part of the information contained herein are, and must be construed solely as, statements of opinion and not statements of fact or recommendations to purchase, sell or hold any securities. Each user of the information contained herein must make its own study and evaluation of each security it may consider purchasing, holding or selling. NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF ANY SUCH RATING OR OTHER OPINION OR INFORMATION IS GIVEN OR MADE BY MOODYS IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER. MIS, a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moodys Corporation (MCO), hereby discloses that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by MIS have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to MIS for appraisal and rating services rendered by it fees ranging from $1,500 to approximately $2,500,000. MCO and MIS also maintain policies and procedures to address the independence of MISs ratings and rating processes. Information regarding certain affiliations that may exist between directors of MCO and rated entities, and between entities who hold ratings from MIS and have also publicly reported to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5%, is posted annually at www.moodys.com under the heading Shareholder Relations Corporate Governance Director and Shareholder Affiliation Policy. For Australia only: Any publication into Australia of this document is pursuant to the Australian Financial Services License of MOODYS affiliate, Moodys Investors Service Pty Limited ABN 61 003 399 657AFSL 336969 and/or Moodys Analytics Australia Pty Ltd ABN 94 105 136 972 AFSL 383569 (as applicable). This document is intended to be provided only to wholesale clients within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. By continuing to access this document from within Australia, you represent to MOODYS that you are, or are accessing the document as a representative of, a wholesale client and that neither you nor the entity you represent will directly or indirectly disseminate this document or its contents to retail clients within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. MOODYS credit rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a debt obligation of the issuer, not on the equity securities of the issuer or any form of security that is available to retail clients. It would be dangerous for retail clients to make any investment decision based on MOODYS credit rating. If in doubt you should contact your financial or other professional adviser.

FEBRUARY 7, 2013

SECTOR COMMENT: TURKISH BANKS: INTRODUCTION OF SUPPLEMENTAL LEVERAGE RATIO IS CREDIT POSITIVE

You might also like