You are on page 1of 21

Federal Register / Vol. 66, No.

100 / Wednesday, May 23, 2001 / Notices 28429

Dated: May 17, 2001. Information and Regulatory Affairs, states provide information the
John Tressler, Attention: Lauren Wittenberg, Acting Department requires to obligate funds
Leader, Regulatory Information Management, Desk Officer, Department of Education, and for program management. The
Office of the Chief Information Officer. Office of Management and Budget, 725 signed assurances legally bind the states
17th Street, NW., Room 10235, New to administer the programs according to
Office of Student Financial Assistance
Executive Office Building, Washington, regulatory and statutory requirements.
Programs
DC 20503 or should be electronically With the clearance of this collection, the
Type of Review: Revision. mailed to the internet address Department is seeking to automate the
Title: Campus-Based Reallocation Lauren_Wittenberg@omb.eop.gov. application for web-based applying for
Form E40–4P. both the LEAP Program and the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section
Frequency: On Occasion. subprogram, SLEAP. There are no
3506 of the Paperwork Reduction Act of
Affected Public: Businesses or other significant changes to the current LEAP
1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35) requires
for-profit; Not-for-profit institutions; form data elements. There are, however,
that the Office of Management and
State, Local, or Tribal Gov’t, SEAs or some additional items pertaining to the
Budget (OMB) provide interested
LEAs. SLEAP Program which combines the
Federal agencies and the public an early
Reporting and Recordkeeping Hour application into one form for both
opportunity to comment on information
Burden: programs.
collection requests. OMB may amend or
Responses: 3,000. Requests for copies of the proposed
waive the requirement for public
Burden Hours: 500. information collection request may be
consultation to the extent that public
Abstract: The Reallocation Form is accessed from http://edicsweb.ed.gov, or
participation in the approval process
necessary to determine the funds should be addressed to Vivian Reese,
would defeat the purpose of the
available and to establish eligibility for Department of Education, 400 Maryland
information collection, violate State or
the distribution of supplemental Federal Avenue, SW, Room 4050, Regional
Federal law, or substantially interfere
Work-Study (FWS) awards. Office Building 3, Washington, D.C.
with any agency’s ability to perform its
Requests for copies of the proposed 20202–4651. Requests may also be
statutory obligations. The Leader,
information collection request may be electronically mailed to the internet
Regulatory Information Management
accessed from http://edicsweb.ed.gov, or address OCIO_IMG_Issues@ed.gov or
Group, Office of the Chief Information
should be addressed to Vivian Reese, faxed to 202–708–9346.
Officer, publishes that notice containing
Department of Education, 400 Maryland Please specify the complete title of the
proposed information collection
Avenue, SW, Room 4050, Regional information collection when making
requests prior to submission of these
Office Building 3, Washington, D.C. your request. Comments regarding
requests to OMB. Each proposed
20202–4651. Requests may also be burden and/or the collection activity
information collection, grouped by
electronically mailed to the internet requirements should be directed to
office, contains the following: (1) Type
address OCIO_IMG_Issues@ed.gov or Joseph Schubart at (202) 708–9266 or
of review requested, e.g. new, revision,
faxed to 202–708–9346. via his internet address
extension, existing or reinstatement; (2)
Please specify the complete title of the Joe.Schubart@ed.gov. Individuals who
Title; (3) Summary of the collection; (4)
information collection when making use a telecommunications device for the
Description of the need for, and
your request. Comments regarding deaf (TDD) may call the Federal
proposed use of, the information; (5)
burden and/or the collection activity Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–
Respondents and frequency of
requirements should be directed to 800–877–8339.
collection; and (6) Reporting and/or
Joseph Schubart at (202) 708–9266 or
Recordkeeping burden. OMB invites [FR Doc. 01–12949 Filed 5–22–01; 8:45 am]
via his internet address
public comment. BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
Joe.Schubart@ed.gov. Individuals who
use a telecommunications device for the Dated: May 17, 2001.
deaf (TDD) may call the Federal John Tressler,
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1– Leader, Regulatory Information Management,
800–877–8339. Office of the Chief Information Officer. [CFDA No. 84.215X]
[FR Doc. 01–12948 Filed 5–22–01; 8:45 am] Office of Student Financial Assistance Teaching American History Grant
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P Programs Program; Notice Inviting Grant
Type of Review: Revision. Applications for New Awards for Fiscal
Title: The Joint Application for the Year (FY) 2001
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Leveraging Educational Assistance
Partnership (SLEAP) and Special Note to Applicants: This notice is a
Submission for OMB Review; complete application package. Together
Leveraging Educational Assistance and
Comment Request with the statute authorizing these grants
Partnership (LEAP) Programs.
AGENCY: Department of Education. Frequency: Annually. and the Education Department General
Affected Public: State, Local, or Tribal Administrative Regulations (EDGAR),
SUMMARY: The Leader, Regulatory this notice contains all of the
Information Management Group, Office Gov’t, SEAs or LEAs.
Reporting and Recordkeeping Hour information, application forms, and
of the Chief Information Officer invites instructions needed to apply for a
Burden:
comments on the submission for OMB Teaching American History grant under
Responses: 56.
review as required by the Paperwork Burden Hours: 112. this competition. These grants are
Reduction Act of 1995. Abstract: The LEAP and SLEAP funded under Title X, Part A of the
DATES: Interested persons are invited to programs use matching Federal and Elementary and Secondary Education
submit comments on or before June 22, State funds to provide a nationwide Act of 1965, as amended (20 U.S.C. 8001
2001. system of grants to assist postsecondary et seq.).
ADDRESSES: Written comments should educational students with substantial Purpose of Program: Teaching
be addressed to the Office of financial need. On this application the American History grants will support

VerDate 11<MAY>2000 19:28 May 22, 2001 Jkt 194001 PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\23MYN1.SGM pfrm04 PsN: 23MYN1
28430 Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 100 / Wednesday, May 23, 2001 / Notices

programs to raise student achievement Please note that applicants for multi- student achievement in American
by improving teachers’ knowledge, year awards are required to provide history by improving teachers’
understanding, and appreciation of detailed budget information for the total knowledge, understanding, and
American history. Grant awards will grant period requested. The Department appreciation for American history
assist local educational agencies (LEAs), will determine at the time of the initial through intensive, ongoing professional
in partnership with entities that have award the funding levels for each year development. These professional
extensive content expertise, to develop, of the grant award. The Department of development activities should reflect
document, evaluate, and disseminate Education is not bound by any estimates the best available research and practice
innovative, cohesive models of in this notice. in teaching, learning, and leadership.
professional development. By helping Note: To provide the applicant the capacity Project activities should enable teachers
teachers to develop a deeper to effectively plan for and carry out the to develop further expertise in
understanding and appreciation of comprehensive long-term activities involved American History subject content,
American history as a separate subject in ongoing, intensive professional teaching strategies, use of technologies,
matter within the core curriculum, these development, to establish partnerships to and other essential elements of teaching
programs will improve instruction and support this work, and to document and to higher standards. Projects should be
demonstrate the effectiveness of its program driven by a coherent, long-term plan
raise student achievement. for future dissemination, the Secretary
Eligible Applicants: Local educational and should be evaluated on the basis of
anticipates awarding the entire three-year
agencies (LEAs), working in partnership grant amount for the project at the time of the their impact on teacher effectiveness
with one or more of the following initial award. and student learning. This assessment
entities: Page Limits: Applicants are strongly should guide subsequent professional
• Institutions of higher education; encouraged to limit the application development efforts.
• Non-profit history or humanities This program will demonstrate how
narrative to no more than 20 double-
organizations; and school districts and institutions with
spaced pages.
• Libraries and museums. expertise in American history can
The following standards are preferred:
Note: Groups of LEAs interested in collaborate over a three-year period to
(1) A ‘‘page’’ is 8.5″ x 11″ (one side only)
submitting a single application must follow ensure that teachers develop the
the procedures for group applications in 34
with one-inch margins (top, bottom, and
knowledge and skills necessary to teach
CFR 75.127–129 of EDGAR. sides). (2) Use 12-point font for all text
American history in an exciting and
in the application narrative.
E-Mail Notification of Intent To Apply engaging way. Through these projects,
The page limit does not apply to the
for Funding: The Department will be districts will demonstrate
cover sheet, the one-page abstract,
able to develop a more efficient process comprehensive professional
budget section, appendices, and forms
for reviewing grant applications if it has development approaches for providing
and assurances.
a better understanding of the number of high-quality American history
Applicable Regulations: The
LEAs that intend to apply for funding instruction. In addition to any
Education Department General
under this competition. Therefore, the dissemination conducted directly by
Administrative Regulations (EDGAR) in
Secretary strongly encourages each grantees, the Department intends to take
34 CFR parts 75, 77, 79, 80, 81, 82, 85,
potential applicant to notify the the products and information resulting
86, 97, 98 and 99.
Department with a short e-mail noting from this grant and share the results
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Budgets
the intent to submit an application for with other communities.
funding. The e-mail need not include must include funds for at least two Under this program, applicants must
information regarding the content of the project staff members to attend a two- propose projects that:
proposed application, only the day annual meeting of the Teaching • Develop and implement high-
applicant’s intent to submit it. The American History Grant Program in quality in-service and/or pre-service
Secretary requests that this e-mail Washington, DC, each year of the professional development that provides
notification be sent no later than June project. Applicants must include funds educators with content and teaching
22, 2001. The e-mail notification should to cover travel and lodging expenses for skills to prepare all students to achieve
be sent to Ms. Christine Miller at: these training activities during each year to higher standards in American history;
TeachingAmericanHistory@ed.gov. of the project. and
Applicants that fail to provide this e- Program Description: The Teaching • Develop and implement strategies
mail notification may still apply for American History grant program is for sustained and on-going collaboration
funding. funded under Part A of Title X of the that will take place over the course of
Deadline for Transmittal of Elementary and Secondary Education at least three years among teachers and
Applications: July 23, 2001. Act. outside experts to improve instruction
Deadline for Intergovernmental Students who know and appreciate in American history.
Review: September 21, 2001. the great ideas of American history are Applicants should consider projects
Estimated Available Funds: more likely to understand and exercise that include at least one or more of the
$50,000,000. their civic rights and responsibilities. following:
Estimated Range of Awards: Their understanding of traditional • Supporting participation of teams of
$350,000–$1,000,000 (total funding per American history will be enhanced if teachers in summer institutes and
grant, for a three-year project period). teachers make the study of history more summer immersion activities;
Estimated Average Size: $500,000 exciting, interesting, and engaging. • Supporting school-based
(total for all three years). Students need teachers who have a collaborative efforts among teachers,
Maximum Award Amount: The total thorough understanding of American including programs that facilitate
amount of funding that an LEA may history as a separate subject within the teacher observation and analyses of
receive under this competition is core curriculum, and incorporate into fellow history teachers’ classroom
$1,000,000. their teaching effective strategies to help practice to improve instruction;
Estimated Number of Awards: 75– students learn. • Developing programs to assist new
125. The Teaching American History Grant history teachers in the classroom, such
Project Period: Up to 36 months. Program will support projects to raise as—

VerDate 11<MAY>2000 19:28 May 22, 2001 Jkt 194001 PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\23MYN1.SGM pfrm04 PsN: 23MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 100 / Wednesday, May 23, 2001 / Notices 28431

(a) Mentoring and coaching by trained • Is applicable to a broad range of • Non-profit history or humanities
mentor teachers over the entire grant rural and urban schools serving poor organizations; or
period; and disadvantaged students, including • Libraries or museums.
(b) Team teaching with experienced those schools that are chronically low- (a) The applicant must identify the
history teachers; or performing; entity or entities with which it will
(c) Providing released time for • Makes effective use of technology to collaborate and include in its
observation and consultation with further the program goals; and application an assurance from
experienced history teachers; • Describes methods by which the appropriate officials of those entities
• Providing collaborative professional that they will work with the applicant
applicant will assess the project’s
development experiences for veteran in implementing the proposal.
outcomes.
history teachers;
• Establishing and maintaining Reporting Requirements and Expected Invitational Priority
professional networks that provide a Outcomes The Secretary is particularly
forum for interaction among teachers interested in receiving applications from
and that allow for the exchange of The Secretary requires successful
applicants to submit annual high-poverty rural and urban LEAs for
information; projects designed to improve American
• Providing guidance to teachers on performance reports that document the
grantee’s yearly progress toward history instruction in chronically low-
the use of technology to provide access performing schools.
to primary historical documents, enable meeting expected programmatic
Definition: In addition to definitions
cooperative learning efforts, and outcomes. The Secretary will use these
in the statute and EDGAR, the following
develop effective presentations of reports to measure the success of the
definition applies:
historical content; and grantee’s project and contribute to a
Research-based, when used with
• Creating materials documenting the broader knowledge base about high-
respect to an activity or a program,
implementation and benefits of the quality, effective professional
means that, to the extent possible, the
program and products for other development strategies that can improve
activity or program is based on the most
educators to use in the course of the teaching and learning of American
rigorous theory, research, and
teaching American history as a separate history nationwide. In addition,
evaluation available and effective in
subject within the core curriculum. grantees will be required to submit a
improving student achievement and
Application Content: To apply for final performance report, due no later
performance and other program
Teaching American History program than 90 days after the end of the project
objectives.
funds, applicants must fully describe, in period.
Selection Criteria: The Secretary uses
their project narrative, projects that: the following selection criteria to
Waiver of Proposed Rulemaking
• Further the development of high-
evaluate applications for grants under
quality professional development In accordance with the
this competition. In all instances where
programs, through collaboration, Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C.
the word ‘‘project’’ appears in the
designed to improve American history 553), it is the practice of the Secretary
education programs in elementary, selection criteria, the reference to a
to offer interested parties the
middle, or high schools; Teaching American History program
opportunity to comment on proposed
• Develop materials designed to help should be made.
rules. Section 437(d)(1) of the General The maximum composite score for all
replicate or adapt the program; Education Provisions Act (GEPA),
• Document the program’s outcomes of these criteria is 100 points. The
however, allows the Secretary to exempt maximum score for each criterion is
and benefits; and from rulemaking requirements rules
• Develop products and services that governing the first grant competition
indicated in parentheses. Within each
may be used to replicate the program in criterion, the Secretary evaluates each
under a new or substantially revised factor equally.
other settings. program authority (20 U.S.C.
Thus, grant applications must 1232(d)(1)). Funding was provided for (a) Need for Project (10 points)
describe existing or proposed strategies
this new initiative in the FY 2001 In determining the need for the
that could successfully be implemented,
appropriations act, enacted December proposed project, the Secretary
expanded, documented, evaluated and
21, 2000. The Secretary, in accordance considers the following factors:
disseminated. Taken together, these
with section 437(d)(1) of GEPA, has (i) The extent to which the proposed
strategies and methods should comprise
decided to forego public comment in project addresses the needs of
a research-based comprehensive
order to ensure timely grant awards. disadvantaged students and students at
American History education
These requirements will apply to the FY risk of educational failure.
improvement project that:
• Is based on reliable theory, 2001 grant competition only. (ii) The extent to which specific gaps
preliminary internal or external Competition Requirements or weaknesses in services,
research, and evaluation regarding infrastructure, or opportunities have
effective practice; Absolute Priority: The following been identified and will be addressed by
• Has the potential to improve requirement applies to all applicants the proposed project, including the
students’ achievement in American seeking funding under this competition. nature and magnitude of those gaps or
history; An applicant must meet this weaknesses.
• Highlights the development of requirement in order to be eligible for
funding. (b) Significance. (20 points)
model pre-service and/or in-service
professional development for history Collaboration With Other Agencies or In determining the significance of the
teachers; Institutions proposed project, the Secretary
• Involves multiple partners and considers one or more of the following
effectively combines resources to create (a) Each applicant must propose to factors:
quality, sustainable programs; work in collaboration with one or more (i) The potential contribution of the
• Demonstrates the feasibility of of the following entities: proposed project to increased
further replication and dissemination; • Institutions of higher education; knowledge or understanding of effective

VerDate 11<MAY>2000 19:28 May 22, 2001 Jkt 194001 PO 00000 Frm 00013 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\23MYN1.SGM pfrm04 PsN: 23MYN1
28432 Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 100 / Wednesday, May 23, 2001 / Notices

strategies to improve instruction and (e) Quality of Project Personnel (5 Contact to find out about, and to comply
student achievement in American points) with, the State’s process under
History. In determining the quality of the Executive Order 12372. Applicants
(ii) The likelihood that the proposed project personnel, the Secretary proposing to perform activities in more
project will result in systematic considers one or more of the following than one State should immediately
improvement in the delivery of factors: contact the Single Point of Contact for
professional development to improve (i) The qualifications, including each of those States and follow the
teacher’s knowledge, understanding and relevant training and experience in procedures established in each State
appreciation of American History. American history, of key project under the Executive order.
(iii) The extent to which the proposed personnel and major partners, project If you want to know the name and
partnership with institutions with consultants and contractors. address of any State Single Point of
expertise in the field will contribute to (ii) The extent to which the applicant Contact (SPOC) you may view the latest
teachers’ ability to instruct students in encourages applications for employment SPOC list on the OMB Web site at the
American History in an engaging from persons who are members of following address: http://
manner. groups that have traditionally been www.whitehouse.gov/omb/grants.
(iv) The likely utility of the products underrepresented based on race, color, In States that have not established a
(such as information, materials, national origin, gender, age, or process or chosen a program for review,
processes, or techniques) that will result disability. State, area-wide, regional, and local
from the proposed project, including the entities may submit comments directly
(f) Quality of the Project Evaluation (15 to the Department.
potential for their being used effectively points)
in a variety of other settings. Any State Process Recommendation
In determining the quality of the and other comments submitted by a
(c) Quality of the Project Design (25 evaluation, the Secretary considers one State Single Point of Contact and any
points) or more of the following factors: comments from State, area-wide,
(i) The extent to which the methods regional, and local entities must be
In determining the quality of the
of evaluation are thorough, feasible, and mailed or hand-delivered by the date
design of the proposed project, the
appropriate to the goals, objectives, and indicated in this notice to the following
Secretary considers one or more of the
outcomes of the proposed project. address: The Secretary, E.O.
following factors:
(ii) The extent to which the methods 12372’CFDA #84.215X, U.S. Department
(i) The extent to which the goals, of evaluation include the use of of Education, Room 7E200, 400
objectives, and outcomes to be achieved objective performance measures that are Maryland Avenue, SW., Washington,
by the proposed project are clearly clearly related to the intended outcomes DC 20202–0125.
specified and measurable. of the project and will produce Proof of mailing will be determined
(ii) The extent to which the quantitative and qualitative data to the on the same basis as applications (see 34
professional development activities to extent possible. CFR 75.102). Recommendations or
be provided by the project are of (iii) The extent to which the comments may be hand-delivered until
sufficient quality, intensity, and evaluation will provide guidance about 4:30 p.m. (Eastern Standard Time) on
duration to lead to improved instruction effective strategies suitable for the date indicated in this notice. Please
in American History. replication or testing in other settings. note that the above address is not the
(iii) The extent to which the project same address as the one to which the
(g) Adequacy of Resources (10 points)
involves the collaboration of applicant submits its completed
appropriate partners with expertise in In determining the adequacy of
application. Do not send applications to
the content of American History to resources for the proposed project, the
the above address.
improve teachers’ knowledge and Secretary considers:
instruction. (i) The extent to which the costs are Instructions for Transmittal of
(iv) The extent to which coherent reasonable and the budget sufficient in Applications
theory or quality external and internal relation to the objectives, design, and
(a) If an applicant wants to apply for
research and evaluation underlie the scope of project activities.
a grant, the applicant must—
proposed project. (ii) The relevance and demonstrated
commitment of each partner in the (1) Mail the original and two copies
(d) Quality of the Management Plan (15 proposed project to the implementation of the application on or before the
points) and success of the project. deadline date to: U.S. Department of
Education, Application Control Center,
In determining the quality of the Intergovernmental Review of Federal Attention: CFDA # 84.215X, Room 3633,
management plan for the proposed Programs Regional Office Building #3, 7th and D
project, the Secretary considers one or This program is subject to the Streets, SW., Washington, DC
more of the following factors: requirements of Executive Order 12372 or
(i) The adequacy of the management (Intergovernmental Review of Federal (2) Hand deliver the original and two
plan to achieve the objectives of the Programs) and the regulations in 34 CFR copies of the application by 4:30 p.m.
proposed project on time and within part 79. (Eastern Standard Time) on or before the
budget, including clearly defined The objective of the Executive order is deadline date to: U.S. Department of
responsibilities, timelines, continuous to foster an intergovernmental Education, Application Control Center,
improvement strategies and milestones partnership and to strengthen Attention: CFDA #84.215X, Room 3633,
for accomplishing project tasks. federalism by relying on State and local Regional Office Building #3, 7th and D
(ii) The extent to which the time processes for State and local Streets, SW., Washington, DC.
commitments of the project director and government coordination and review of (b) An applicant must show one of the
other key project personnel are proposed Federal financial assistance. following as proof of mailing:
appropriate and adequate to meet the Applicants must contact the (1) A legibly dated U.S. Postal Service
objectives of the proposed project. appropriate State Single Point of postmark.

VerDate 11<MAY>2000 19:28 May 22, 2001 Jkt 194001 PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\23MYN1.SGM pfrm04 PsN: 23MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 100 / Wednesday, May 23, 2001 / Notices 28433

(2) A legible mail receipt with the evaluating the application. Applicants Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–888–877–
date of mailing stamped by the U.S. are strongly encouraged to limit the 8339.
Postal Service. application narrative to no more than 20 Individuals with disabilities may
(3) A dated shipping label, invoice, or double-spaced, standard-type pages. obtain this notice in an alternative
receipt from a commercial carrier. The following standards are preferred: format (e.g., Braille, large print,
(4) Any other proof of mailing (1) A ‘‘page’’ is 8.5″ x 11″ (one side only) audiotape, or computer diskette) on
acceptable to the Secretary. with one-inch margins (top, bottom, and request to the contact persons.
(c) If an application is mailed through sides). (2) If using a proportional Electronic Access to This Document
the U.S. Postal Service, the Secretary computer font, applicants are requested
does not accept either of the following to use a 12-point font. You may view this document, as well
as proof of mailing: as all other Department of Education
(1) A private metered postmark. Part IV: Assurances and Certifications documents published in the Federal
(2) A mail receipt that is not dated by a. Assurances—Non-Construction Register, in text or Adobe Portable
the U.S. Postal Service. Programs (Standard Form 424B). Document Format (PDF) on the Internet
Note: (1) The U.S. Postal Service does not at the following site: http://www.ed.gov/
b. Certifications Regarding Lobbying;
uniformly provide a dated postmark. Before legislation/FedRegister.
Debarment, Suspension, and Other
relying on this method, an applicant should To use PDF you must have Adobe
Responsibility Matters; and Drug-Free
check with its local post office. Acrobat Reader, which is available free
(2) The Application Control Center will Workplace Requirements (ED 80–0013)
at this site. If you have questions about
mail a Grant Application Receipt and instructions.
using PDF, call the U.S. Government
Acknowledgment to each applicant. If an c. Certifications regarding Debarment, Printing Office (GPO) toll free, at 1–888–
applicant fails to receive the notification of Suspension, Ineligibility and Voluntary 293–6498; or in the Washington, DC
application receipt within 15 days from the Exclusion—Lower Tier Covered
date of mailing the application, the applicant area at (202) 512–1530.
Transactions (ED 80–0014, 9/90) and Note: The official version of this document
should call the U.S. Department of Education instructions.
Application Control Center at (202) 708– is the document published in the Federal
9494. Note: ED Form 80–0014 is intended for the Register. Free Internet access to the official
(3) The applicant must indicate on the use of grantees and should not be transmitted edition of the Federal Register and the Code
envelope and—if not provided by the to the Department. of Federal Regulations is available on GPO
Department—in Item 3 of the Application for Access at: http://www.access.gpo.gov/nara/
d. Disclosure of Lobbying Activities
Federal Assistance (ED 424) the CFDA index.html
(Standard Form LLL) (if applicable) and
number—and suffix letter, if any—of the instructions. Program Authority: 20 U.S.C. 8001 et seq.
competition under which the application is
being submitted. An applicant may submit information Dated: May 17, 2001.
on photostatic copies of the application, Thomas M. Corwin,
Application Instructions and Forms budget forms, assurances, and Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for
The appendix to this notice contains certifications as printed in this notice in Elementary and Secondary Education.
all required forms and instructions, the Federal Register. However, the
application form, assurances, and Appendix
including instructions for preparing the
application narrative, a statement certifications must each have an original Instructions for the Application Narrative
regarding estimated public reporting signature. All applicants are required to The narrative is the section of the
burden, a notice to applicants regarding submit ONE original signed application, application where the selection criteria used
compliance with section 427 of the including ink signatures on all forms by reviewers in evaluating the application are
and assurances, and TWO copies of the addressed. The narrative must encompass
General Education Provisions Act each function or activity for which funds are
(GEPA), various assurances and application, one bound and one
unbound copy suitable for being requested. Before preparing the
certifications, and a checklist for application narrative, an applicant should
applicants. photocopying. Please mark each read carefully the description of the program
To apply for an award under this application as ‘‘original’’ or ‘‘copy.’’ To and the selection criteria the Secretary uses
competition, your application must be aid with the review of applications, the to evaluate applications.
organized in the following order and Department encourages applicants to Applicants should note the preferable page
include the following four parts. The submit two additional paper copies of limits for the application narrative stated in
the application. The Department will this notice under Page Limits.
parts and additional materials are as 1. Begin with a one-page Abstract
follows: not penalize applicants who do not
provide additional copies. No grant may summarizing the proposed Teaching
Part I: Application for Federal American History project, including a
be awarded unless a completed description of project objectives and
Assistance (ED 424, Exp. 06/30/2001) application form, including the signed activities and partners in the application.
and Instructions assurances and certifications, has been Also include a short description of the
Part II: Budget Information-Non- received. population to be served by the project.
Construction Programs (ED Form No. 2. Include a table of contents listing the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: parts of the narrative in the order of the
524) and Instructions Christine Miller or Alex Stein, Teaching selection criteria and the page numbers
An applicant for a multi-year project American History Grant Program, U.S. where the parts of the narrative are found. Be
must provide a budget narrative that Department of Education, 400 Maryland sure to number the pages.
provides budget information for each Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20202– 3. Describe how the applicant meets the
budget period of the proposed project 6200. Telephone (202) 260–8766 absolute priority.
(Christine Miller) or (202) 205–9085 4. Describe fully the proposed project in
period. light of the selection criteria in the order in
(Alex Stein). E-mail: which the criteria are listed in the
Part III: Application Narrative teachingamericanhistory@ed.gov. application package. Do not simply
The application narrative is where an Individuals who use a paraphrase the criteria.
applicant addresses the selection telecommunications device for the deaf 5. Provide the following in response to the
criteria that are used by reviewers in (TDD) may call the Federal Information attached ‘‘Notice to all Applicants:’’ (1) A

VerDate 11<MAY>2000 19:28 May 22, 2001 Jkt 194001 PO 00000 Frm 00015 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\23MYN1.SGM pfrm04 PsN: 23MYN1
28434 Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 100 / Wednesday, May 23, 2001 / Notices

reference to the portion of the application in 8. Attach copies of all required assurances Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW, FB–6,
which information appears as to how the and forms. 5C126, Washington, DC 20202–6200.
applicant is addressing steps to promote
equitable access and participation, or (2) a Estimated Public Reporting Burden Checklist for Applicants
separate statement that contains that According to the Paperwork Reduction Act The following forms and other items must
information. of 1995, you are not required to respond to be included in the application in the order
6. If the application is from a group, attach a collection of information unless it displays listed below:
the group’s agreement. When applying for a valid OMB Control Number. The valid
funds as a group, such as a consortium, OMB control number for this information l1. Application for Federal Assistance (ED
individual eligible applicants must enter into collection is 1810–0639, (Expiration Date: 05/ 424)
an agreement signed by all members of the 31/2004). The time required to complete this l2. Budget Information—Non-Construction
group. The group’s agreement must detail the information collection is estimated to average Programs ED Form No. 524) and budget
activities each member of the group plans to sixty-five (65) hours per response, including narrative.
perform, and must bind each member to the time to review instructions, search l3. Application Narrative, including
every statement and assurance made in the existing data resources, gather the data information that addresses section 427 of
group’s application. (The designated needed, and complete and review the the General Education Provisions Act (see
applicant must submit the group’s agreement information collection. If you have any the section entitled ‘‘NOTICE TO ALL
with its application.) comments concerning the accuracy of the APPLICANTS’’), and relevant appendices.
7. Applicants may include supporting time estimate or suggestions for improving l4. Group agreement, if applicable.
documentation as appendices to the this form, please write to: Christine Miller, l5. Assurances—Non-Construction
narrative. This material should be concise Teaching American History Grant Program, Programs (SF 242B).
and pertinent to the competition. Note that U.S. Department of Education, 400 Maryland l6. Certifications Regarding Lobbying;
the Secretary considers only information Avenue SW, FB–6, 5C126, Washington, DC Debarment, Suspension, and Other
contained in the application in ranking 20202–6200. Responsibility Matters; and Drug-Free
applications for funding consideration. If you have comments or concerns Workplace Requirements (ED 80–0013).
Letters of support sent separately from the regarding the status of your individual
l7. Disclosure of Lobbying Activities
formal application package are not submission of this form, write directly to:
(Standard Form LLL).
considered in the review by the technical Christine Miller, Teaching American History
review panels. Grant Program, U.S. Department of BILLING CODE 4001–01–U

VerDate 11<MAY>2000 19:28 May 22, 2001 Jkt 194001 PO 00000 Frm 00016 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\23MYN1.SGM pfrm04 PsN: 23MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 100 / Wednesday, May 23, 2001 / Notices 28435

VerDate 11<MAY>2000 19:28 May 22, 2001 Jkt 194001 PO 00000 Frm 00017 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4725 E:\FR\FM\23MYN1.SGM pfrm04 PsN: 23MYN1
28436 Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 100 / Wednesday, May 23, 2001 / Notices

VerDate 11<MAY>2000 19:28 May 22, 2001 Jkt 194001 PO 00000 Frm 00018 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4725 E:\FR\FM\23MYN1.SGM pfrm04 PsN: 23MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 100 / Wednesday, May 23, 2001 / Notices 28437

VerDate 11<MAY>2000 19:28 May 22, 2001 Jkt 194001 PO 00000 Frm 00019 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4725 E:\FR\FM\23MYN1.SGM pfrm04 PsN: 23MYN1
28438 Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 100 / Wednesday, May 23, 2001 / Notices

VerDate 11<MAY>2000 19:28 May 22, 2001 Jkt 194001 PO 00000 Frm 00020 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4725 E:\FR\FM\23MYN1.SGM pfrm04 PsN: 23MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 100 / Wednesday, May 23, 2001 / Notices 28439

VerDate 11<MAY>2000 19:28 May 22, 2001 Jkt 194001 PO 00000 Frm 00021 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4725 E:\FR\FM\23MYN1.SGM pfrm04 PsN: 23MYN1
28440 Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 100 / Wednesday, May 23, 2001 / Notices

VerDate 11<MAY>2000 19:28 May 22, 2001 Jkt 194001 PO 00000 Frm 00022 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4725 E:\FR\FM\23MYN1.SGM pfrm04 PsN: 23MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 100 / Wednesday, May 23, 2001 / Notices 28441

VerDate 11<MAY>2000 19:28 May 22, 2001 Jkt 194001 PO 00000 Frm 00023 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4725 E:\FR\FM\23MYN1.SGM pfrm04 PsN: 23MYN1
28442 Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 100 / Wednesday, May 23, 2001 / Notices

VerDate 11<MAY>2000 19:28 May 22, 2001 Jkt 194001 PO 00000 Frm 00024 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4725 E:\FR\FM\23MYN1.SGM pfrm04 PsN: 23MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 100 / Wednesday, May 23, 2001 / Notices 28443

VerDate 11<MAY>2000 19:28 May 22, 2001 Jkt 194001 PO 00000 Frm 00025 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4725 E:\FR\FM\23MYN1.SGM pfrm04 PsN: 23MYN1
28444 Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 100 / Wednesday, May 23, 2001 / Notices

VerDate 11<MAY>2000 19:28 May 22, 2001 Jkt 194001 PO 00000 Frm 00026 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4725 E:\FR\FM\23MYN1.SGM pfrm04 PsN: 23MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 100 / Wednesday, May 23, 2001 / Notices 28445

VerDate 11<MAY>2000 19:28 May 22, 2001 Jkt 194001 PO 00000 Frm 00027 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4725 E:\FR\FM\23MYN1.SGM pfrm04 PsN: 23MYN1
28446 Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 100 / Wednesday, May 23, 2001 / Notices

VerDate 11<MAY>2000 19:28 May 22, 2001 Jkt 194001 PO 00000 Frm 00028 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4725 E:\FR\FM\23MYN1.SGM pfrm04 PsN: 23MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 100 / Wednesday, May 23, 2001 / Notices 28447

VerDate 11<MAY>2000 19:28 May 22, 2001 Jkt 194001 PO 00000 Frm 00029 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4725 E:\FR\FM\23MYN1.SGM pfrm04 PsN: 23MYN1
28448 Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 100 / Wednesday, May 23, 2001 / Notices

VerDate 11<MAY>2000 19:28 May 22, 2001 Jkt 194001 PO 00000 Frm 00030 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4725 E:\FR\FM\23MYN1.SGM pfrm04 PsN: 23MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 100 / Wednesday, May 23, 2001 / Notices 28449

[FR Doc. 01–12931 Filed 5–22–01; 8:45 am]


BILLING CODE 4001–01–C

VerDate 11<MAY>2000 19:28 May 22, 2001 Jkt 194001 PO 00000 Frm 00031 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\23MYN1.SGM pfrm04 PsN: 23MYN1

You might also like