You are on page 1of 2

The Internal Structure of the Syllable Rebecca Treiman Linguistic Structure in Language Processing Studies in Theoretical Psycholinguistics Volume

7, 1988, pp 27-52 http://link.springer.com.tiger.sempertool.dk/chapter/10.1007/978-94-009-2729-2_2 Until relatively recently, phonologists tended to neglect the syllable or to leave it undefined. Generative phonologists often claimed that the syllable played no role in phonological organization. Recently, however, this position has changed. The syllable has begun to be reintegrated into phonological theory. (For discussion, see Clements and Keyser, 1983.) Two competing views of the syllable may be distinguished. In one view (e.g., Hooper, 1972), the syllable is seen as a linear string of phonemes. The syllable itself has no internal structure. Another position (e.g., Cairns and Feinstein, 1982; Fudge, 1969; Halle and Vergnaud, 1980; Hockett, 1967/1973; Selkirk, 1982; Vergnaud and Halle, 1979) is that the syllable has a hierarchical internal organization. That is, there exist units intermediate in size between the syllable and the phoneme. Hierarchical views of the syllable typically divide the syllable into two primary units. These are, to use the terminology of Vergnaud and Halle (1979), the onset and the rime.1 The onset is the initial consonant or consonant cluster of the syllable. For example, the onset of the word strip is /str/, the onset of trip is /tr/, and the onset of rip is /r/. In English, the onset is not obligatory: The syllable ip does not have an onset. The rime of the syllable is the vowel and any consonants that come after it.

The division between onsets and rimes in English syllables Journal of Memory and Language Volume 25, Issue 4, August 1986, Pages 476491 Rebecca Treiman

Wayne State University USA http://dx.doi.org.tiger.sempertool.dk/10.1016/0749-596X(86)90039-2, How to Cite or Link Using DOI

Linguistic and psycholinguistic evidence suggests that the English syllable has two main partsan onset (initial consonant or cluster) and a rime (vowel and any following consonants). For example, subjects learn manipulations that respect the unity of onsets and rimes more easily than manipulations that do not. The present results showed that these findings held for real words as well as for nonwords and for three-consonant onsets as well as for one- and two-consonant onsets. The strength of the onset/rime division did not vary with the phonetic category of the prevocalic consonant. Finally, although college students learned a word game involving the analysis of syllables more quickly than did 8-year-olds, the two groups showed similar effects of syllable structure.

You might also like