Professional Documents
Culture Documents
LIST
OF
ABBREVIATIONS ..................................................................................................... 4 ABSTRACT .......................................................................................................................... 5 CORDA
CORPORATION ....................................................................................................... 5 OVERVIEW
OF
THE
OIL
MARKET .......................................................................................... 7 BRIEF
HISTORY
OF
THE
OIL
MARKET ........................................................................................... 7 CRUDE
BENCHMARKS........................................................................................................... 12 World
-
Brent
Crude ..................................................................................................... 13 American
-
WTI
Crude .................................................................................................. 13
Bottleneck
WTI .................................................................................................................................... 15
IMPACTS
ON
OIL
PRICES ................................................................................................... 20 SUPPLY
AND
DEMAND .......................................................................................................... 20 Rising
demand ............................................................................................................ 20 Tighter
supply ............................................................................................................. 22 Inventories ................................................................................................................. 24 Spare
Capacity ............................................................................................................ 25 Geopolitical
Uncertainty .............................................................................................. 27 Weather
Uncertainty ................................................................................................... 29 EXCHANGE
RATES ............................................................................................................... 29 INTEREST
RATES ................................................................................................................. 30 SCARCITY
RENT-
MODEL
OF
HOTELLING ..................................................................................... 30 Changes
in
the
extraction
costs .................................................................................... 32 New
crude
Discoveries ................................................................................................. 32 Backstop
technology ................................................................................................... 33 Impacts
of
a
monopoly ................................................................................................ 34 PRICE-INELASTIC
IN
THE
SHORT
TERM........................................................................................ 35 PRICE
VOLATILITY ............................................................................................................... 35
Restructuring
of
Corda
Corp .................................................................................................................. 38
INTRODUCTION TO DERIVATIVE OIL PRODUCTS ................................................................. 38 OTC DERIVATIVE ................................................................................................................ 39 Price Reporting Agencies.............................................................................................. 40 FUTURE MARKET ................................................................................................................ 41 Specifications of Light Sweet Crude and Brent ................................................................ 42 Future curves and Pricing ............................................................................................. 42 SPECULATION IMPACTS ON CRUDE MARKETS .............................................................................. 46 Parties on the future market ........................................................................................ 47 CALCULATING CRUDE PRICE ................................................................................................... 50 CASE STUDY ..................................................................................................................... 53 RISKS OF HEDGING .............................................................................................................. 54 AIMS OF HEDGING .............................................................................................................. 55 CORDA CORPORATOIN 2011 ................................................................................................. 57 FUTURE STRATEGY .............................................................................................................. 58 COLLAR STRATEGY .............................................................................................................. 62 2
LIST
OF
ABBREVIATIONS
API
ASCI
bbl
BFOE
EIA
IEA
IOC
IOSCO
NOC
OPEC
OTC
PADD
PRA
TRC
WTI
American
Petroleum
Institute
gravity
Argus
Sour
Crude
Index
Barrel
/
158
liter
Brent
Blend,
Forties,
Oseberg,
Ekofisk
U.S.
Energy
Information
Administration
International
Energy
Agency
International
Oil
Companies
International
Organization
of
Securities
Commissions
Nationalized
Oil
Company
Organization
of
Petroleum
Exporting
Countries
Over
the
counter
Petroleum
Allocation
for
Defense
Districts
Price
Reporting Agency
Texas
Railroad
Commission
West
Texas
Intermediate
ABSTRACT
Exploration
and
production
companies
like
Corda
Corporation
have
to
face
a
variety
of
risks.
The
origin
of
these
uncertainties
arise
from
the
complexity
of
the
industry.
In
general,
these
risks
can
be
divided
into
two
groups:
Element
/
technical
risks:
containing
construction,
operation,
financing,
and
revenue
generation
risk
Global
/
market
risk:
lasting
from
political,
legal,
commercial
and
environmental
risk,
to
crude
prices
risk
Crude producers can sway the technical risks, since they can influence the volume of their production. Independent exploration and production companies are in a competitive market, therefore, they cannot influence market risks and have to find ways to roll over market risks. 1 The aim of this paper is to provide different crude price hedging strategies for Corda Corporation. In order to understand the specialties of the market, I will start with a broad history and overview. I will then determine factors that impact crude pricing and will pay special attention to the scarcity rent that is described by the Hotelling rule. I will ultimately show the need for hedging strategies for crude prices. I will then introduce derivative instruments that help to hedge crude prices. Finally, I will apply these methods to a case study on Corda Corporation.
CORDA
CORPORATION
Paul
DeCleva
Jr.
founded
Corda
Corporation
in
1982.
Corda
Corporation
is
an
oil
and
gas
exploration
corporation
with
an
executive
office
in
Dallas,
TX
and
a
production
office
in
Wichita
Falls,
TX.
Corda
Corporation
runs
56
producing
wells
in
and
around
Texas.
The
players
in
the
oil
business
can
be
divided
into
3
categories:
Upstream
Midstream
Downstream
Exploration
and
production
Transportation
of
hydrocarbons
Refining,
distribution,
and
retailing
Corda Corporation is one of the Exploration & Production companies. His father, Mr. Paul DeCleva Sr., came from Hungary to America after the Second World War, where he fulfilled the "American Dream." He drilled over 850 wells and set the course for his
On the State's Choice of Oil Company: Risk Management and the Frontier of the Petroleum Industry, Peter A. Nolan and Mark C. Thurber, Program on Energy and Sustainable Development, 12-2010 (S 7)
1
son. Even though he is 97 years old, he is still in the office every day. Paul DeCleva Sr. has four children, all of whom have an interest in the business; his son Paul DeCleva Jr. runs the business. Because its a family business, the Corda Corporations strategy is conservative and aims for long-term success. To retain control over the development, Corda Corporation prefers operating on its own properties, while also financing its projects with a combination of its own capital and external private equity. Further, the management seeks to increase oil, gas reserves and production through a combination of new exploratory drilling and takes advantage of techniques for the development of existing wells. Corda Corporation is concentrating on their core business: the exploration and development of vertical wells in the Fort Worth Basin in Texas. The Fort Worth Basin is famous for its unconventional energy sources of shale gas and shale oil. The oil and gas is captured in tight formations. These unconventional sources became available through new technologies like horizontal drilling. Horizontal drilling is an expensive and risky drilling method for independent firms. The costs for drilling a h orizontal well are three times higher than a comparable vertical well. Due to the h igh capital intensity of horizontal drilling, an independent exploration and p roduction firm would have to shoulder a higher risk compared to major companies, since they could drill less wells, resulting in a lower diversification. As a result, horizontal wells are mostly operated by major or second- tier integrated companies rather than by independent exploration and production companies. However, the Fort Worth Basin contains other types of layers with hydrocarbons that can be reached through the classical vertical drilling. Corda Corporation outsourced the drilling rigs in the 1980s and books the drilling as a service from a drilling rig contractor. In the section "Consequences of Oil Price Volatility," I will take a closer look at the reasons for this decision. High oil prices made the past year extraordinary for Corda Corporation. The average price for the WTI crude was $92.37, and Corda Corporation's gross oil and gas revenue from operated properties were $9,436,249 in 2011. A minor part of Corda Corporations income is due to gas sales. The wells of Corda Corporation are producing a mixture of oil and gas. However, gas prices are tumbling at a low price level. This paper is going to focus entirely on oil, as it plays the leading role for Corda Corporation
1870- Standard Oil Company Standard Oil Company 1911 1931- TRC Seven Sisters / netback pricing 1971 1971- OPEC-Seven Sisters / posted pricing and buyback OPEC 1973 pricing 1974- OPEC 1975 OPEC / administered oil-pricing regime 1984- OPEC Market pricing - finished product 1986 1986- OPEC Market pricing crude 2012 In order to understand the current oil price system, it is important to take a closer look at previous oil pricing systems and their major changes. This chapter discusses the main alterations in the oil market. 2 The history of the modern oil market begins in 1870 in America with John D. Rockefeller forming "The Standard Oil Company." Rockefeller controlled 90% of the American oil market, and thus was frightening the American public and government. In 1911 The Standard Oil Company was split in to 34 companies. Some of todays major oil companies, like ExxonMobil, Chevron, and ConocoPhillips, have their origin in The Standard Oil Company. The next era began in 1931 when massive oil fields were discovered in Texas. The US government imposed production restrictions through the Texas Railroad Commission (TRC) in order to support the oil industry. At that time the TRC was in control of the crude spare capacity and thus controlled the global crude pricing. This was the time of the International Oil Corporations (IOC), also called the Seven Sisters. The Seven Sisters controlled the upstream, midstream, and the downstream. Furthermore, they controlled the rate of supply through concessions that they received from major oil producing countries. The profits were split 50/50 between the foreign government and the IOC.
The history is based on four books: The Prize: The Epic Quest for Oil, Money, & Power, Daniel Yergin, ISBN 978-0671799328, 2011 / The Quest - Energy, Security, and the Remaking of the Modern World; Daniel Yergin, ISBN 978-1-59420-283-4, 2011 / Understanding Oil Prices - A Guide to What Drives the Price of Oil in Today's Markets, Salvatore Carollo, ISBN 978-119-96272-4, 2012/ and the history part of Oil 101, Morgan Downey, ISBN 978-0-09820392-0-5, 2009
2
The oil majors set the posted price over netback pricing. Netback pricing linked the crude in a foreign country to the transparent US gulf price and discounted it by the freighting costs to the US gulf coast. The result was an underdeveloped spot market where the posted price did not respond to the actual demand and supply on the market. Basically, it had no function of allocation. Instead, the Seven Sisters set the posted price and controlled the revenues of the oil exporting countries. After the oil fields in the Middle East were developed with the help of the IOC, the foreign oil producing countries had no need for the IOC. Some of the foreign producing countries began to nationalize their oil sectors. At the beginning of the nationalization process, the oil producing countries gained control over the oil companies with equity participations. These participations increased over time, finally resulting in a complete nationalization, like in Kuwait in 1980 or in Iraq in 1972. This was not the only problem for the IOC between 1960 and 1970. The competition in the exploration and production sector was increasing, and more and more independent oil companies were appearing. These independent oil companies were entering the upstream market and were assuring concession in countries like Venezuela, Libya, Iran, and Saudi Arabia. Furthermore, the independent companies started to produce huge volumes of crude, forcing the majors to lower the posted prices. The major oil-producing countries formed a supply cartel: Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC). The main idea of OPEC was to organize the different national oil companies. Furthermore, the OPEC was formed as a correspondent to the Seven Sisters in order to fight against the declining posted prices. 3 In 1971, six OPEC Gulf members: Abu Dhabi, Iran, Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and Kuwait, formed the Ministerial Committee. The Ministerial Committee was empowered by the Saudi Arabian Oil minister. The Saudi Arabian Oil minister should negotiate the posted prices with the oil companies and collectively for the other OPEC member. These changes led to a shift in the balance of power, from the IOC to OPEC. Now, OPEC members gained control over the oil pricing system, and they would change it in its foundations. Instead of the posted price being set by the IOC, OPEC published an official selling price. This price was not only published by the IOC, but also, OPEC tried to sell their crude to their rising competitors in order to be more independent. However, the governments were unable to market all of their crude to third party buyers, so they sold their crude to the major oil companies for the buyback price. On the other side of things, the oil companies were still holding on their old price system and thus were also posting their prices. This system was complex and highly inefficient, because the purchaser could choose between three different prices. This pricing system was discarded by the administered oil-pricing regime, ruling from 1974 to 1975. In this pricing system, the Saudi Arabian Light crude was chosen as the
Oil Politics: A Modern History of Petroleum, Parra, London: IB Tauris, 2004, (Page1-10)
3
reference crude. The different crudes of the OPEC countries were set in relation to the market price, and they were adjusted depending on crude quality. This was the final power exchange, with OPEC setting the oil prices. Between 1965 and 1973 global crude demand was sharply increasing. The increasing demand was mainly met by higher production rates from OPEC countries. OPEC increased its share in the global production from 44% in 1965 to 51% in 1973. 4 During the 1980s, the US oil production peaked. Now the OPEC controlled over the spare production capacity, and OPEC was setting the oil prices in a time of rising demand. It was the first time that OPEC had set the posted price in a unilateral role. Before, OPEC had only been able to prevent oil companies from reducing the price. In 1973, some of the OPEC members imposed an oil embargo on the US and the Netherlands for a period of six months. The reason being that the US supported Israel with its military. The embargo resulted in a 5% to 10% cut in crude supply and a price increase in todays terms, from $14.00 to $50.00. This was the first time that oil was used as a weapon, and this led to the first oil crisis. Shortly after the first oil shock, the second oil shock came during the period 1978-1981. This time it was caused by a strike of Iranian oil workers and was followed by the Iran-Iraq War. The price was rising to new heights, reaching price levels of $90.00 in todays terms. During this time, the general public in the developing countries began to realize how dependent they were on crude oil and especially how dependent they were on OPEC countries. In addition, a new environmental movement came along, resulting in technological improvements and higher fuel efficiency. This led to a sinking demand of crude oil. During the second oil crisis, the crude spot prices were rising faster than the official selling price. The official selling price was linked to the reference price of Saudi Arabian Light crude. The problem for the OPEC countries was that they had long-term contracts with the oil companies based on the official selling price. The oil company could make profits by selling the differential between spot and official selling price. As a result, OPEC producer countries were abandoning their long-term contracts and starting to sell large volumes of crude to the players in the spot market. During this time, the major oil companies had lost large percentages of their oil reserves through equity participation and nationalization. Thus, they were searching for new reserves outside the OPEC.5 These reserves were found in Canada and the Gulf of Mexico. However, it would take until the early 1980s to bring these reservoirs to the oil market. In addition, small independent market players, piqued by high oil prices, were entering the market and exploring
An Anatomy of the Crude Pricing System, Bassam Fattouh, The Oxford Institute for Energy Studies, 01-2011 (Page 15)
4
On the State's Choice of Oil Company: Risk Management and the Frontier of the Petroleum Industry, Peter A. Nolan and Mark C. Thurber, Program on Energy and Sustainable Development, 12-2010 (S26)
5
new
fields.
In
the
mid
1980s,
oil
demand
was
declining,
whereas
supply
was
rising.
Furthermore,
these
new
suppliers
were
undercutting
the
oil
prices
set
by
the
OPEC
in
the
spot
market.
As
a
result,
OPEC
market
shares
in
the
world
oil
production
were
sharply
dropping
from
51%
in
1973
to
28%
in
1985.
Disagreements
started
to
arise
between
the
OPEC
countries
about
how
to
set
the
oil
prices
effectively.
It
became
clear
very
quickly:
independent
producers
could
always
sell
their
crude
at
a
discount
to
the
official
price,
and
this
pricing
system
is
therefore
unlikely
to
hold.
6
In
1984
the
power
of
setting
the
crude
prices
changed
and
set
up
a
new
chapter
in
the
history
of
oil
pricing.
The
oil
price
was
first
set
by
multinational
oil
companies,
then
by
the
OPEC,
and
this
time
by
the
markets
in
the
future
exchange
marketplaces.
The
system
is
called
a
market-related
pricing
system.
At
the
beginning
crudes
were
linked
to
the
finished
products.
The
refinery
paid
the
producer
the
difference
between
the
selling
prices
of
their
finished
product
and
subtracted
the
fixed
refinery
margin.
In
this
pricing
system,
refineries
had
an
incentive
to
run
at
high
capacity
and
oversupplied
the
markets
with
their
products.
This
resulted
in
lower
product
and
crude
prices.
The
crude
prices
sharply
decreased
from
$26.70
per
barrel
in
July
1985
to
$9.15
per
barrel
in
July
1986.
The
yields
(finished-products)
of
one
barrel
(42-gallons)
of
crude
are
dependent
on
the
type
of
refinery
and
the
characteristics
of
the
crude.
These
figures
show
the
average
yield
of
US
refineries:
Finished
Product
Gasoline
Distillate
Fuel
Oil
(Home
Heating
and
Diesel)
Kerosene
(Jet
Fuel)
Residual
Fuel
Petroleum
Coke
Other
Products
Source:
Database
-
refining
crude
oil
from
IEA
During
this
time
there
were
spare
refinery
capacity
and
OPEC
crude
oil
producers
replaced
the
refining
margin
netback
pricing
with
the
crude
oil
formula
netback
pricing
system.
OPEC
producers
would
set
their
crude
price
in
relationship
to
a
crude
benchmark,
also
known
as
a
Risk Management at Apache, Lisa Meulbroek, Harvard Business School, 08-272001(Page 4)
6
10
price marker, plus or minus a differential. The market-related pricing system became standard in 1988 and is still the main method used today; all market participants are now setting the oil prices. During the year 1990, the price for crude spiked again, doubling within a week. This time it was a result of uncertainties related to the Iraq invasion of Kuwait. Saudi Arabia and other countries were increasing their production, and the crude prices were rising and falling very quickly in succession. In late 1998 the crude prices plummeted due to an oversupply of almost $11.00. The oversupply happened because of the Asian financial crisis and the United Nation "oil-for-food" program for Iraq.
Source:
Database
-
spot
prices
WTI
from
IEA
In the beginning of the 21st century, demand was soaring, and the Asian economies recovered. In addition, it was the beginning of the Internet bubble, a time of great world GDP growth rates. The prices were almost tripling - even sharper than during the Iran revolution. At the beginning of 2006 the oil prices dipped slightly, followed by a time of rising prices, lasting until the financial crisis of 2008. 7 There are three main reasons for the rapid price increase, resulting in a crude price bubble from mid 2006 until the world financial crisis in 2008: first, Chinas rapidly growing economy; second, the rising impacts of financial speculation on the crude markets, and third, the threat that the world production had passed its peak. Furthermore, it seemed that the markets had become very sensitive to small shocks and news, resulting in high volatility.
Understanding Oil Prices - A Guide to What Drives the Price of Oil in Today's Markets, Salvatore Carollo, ISBN 978-119-96272-4, 2012 (Page 10-17)
7
11
The financial crisis of 2008 led to a collapse of the oil prices. As fast as the prices collapsed in 2008, they were rising again in the middle of 2010. In this period, the daily oil prices tended to walk random, with an upward trend.8 The history of the last two decades especially shows the great volatility of crude prices. Further, it makes clear that the pricing system is not always underlined by rational decisions. 9
CRUDE
BENCHMARKS
Nowadays,
there
are
a
variety
of
different
indicators
for
determining
crude
prices.
However,
there
are
three
major
international
benchmarks.
Two
of
them
are
mainly
used
for
the
western
countries:
WTI
in
the
US,
Dated
Brent
in
Europe,
and
Dubai
crude
for
the
Asian
region.
60-70%
of
the
international
oil
trades
are
directly
or
indirectly
based
on
the
Brent
Benchmark.
Dubai
crude,
also
known
as
Fateh,
is
used
with
Oman
crude
as
the
benchmark
for
countries
from
the
Middle
East.
There
is
a
new
fourth
index
arising
also:
the
Argus
Sour
Crude
Index
(ASCI).
The
ASCI
benchmark
is
seen
as
an
addition
to
WTI.
In
the
long
run
there
is
an
equilibrium
relationship
between
these
benchmarks
where
the
world
market
is
unified
and
homogenous.
There
is
an
impulse
response
function
between
the
markets
where
WTI
crude
leads
Brent
and
the
ASCI;
Brent
leads
Dubai
and
Oman
crude.
10
Most
of
the
crude
prices
are
linked
to
benchmark
prices
plus
or
minus
a
differential,
which
represent
a
special
type
of
crude
in
a
specific
area.
However,
these
benchmarks
represent
a
relatively
low
volume
of
production,
while
they
set
the
price
for
a
high
volume
of
crudes.
The
problem
becomes
even
more
serious
when
the
benchmark
markets
get
tighter,
and
production
rates
are
declining.
In
thin
markets,
the
price
discovery
process
becomes
more
difficult,
and
the
danger
of
market
players
manipulating
and
squeezing
the
benchmark
rises.
11
Squeezing
occurs
when
a
party
goes
long
in
the
forward/future
market
with
a
volume
that
exceeds
the
physical
market.
It
is
only
possible
to
squeeze
a
market
if
the
parties
have
anonymity
and
if
the
parties
are
trading
relatively
huge
volumes.
The
results
are
prices
that
are
not
reflecting
actual
market
conditions
and
higher
volatility.
Empirical Evidence of Some Stylized Facts in International Crude Oil Markets, Ling-Yun He, College of Economics and Management, Chinese Agricultural University,2008 (Page 2) 9 Probability Distribution of Return and Volatility in Crude Oil Market, Tung-Li Shinih, Hai-Chin Yu, MingoDao University Taiwan, 2009 (Page1-4)
8
Lead-Lag Relationship between World Crude Oil Benchmarks: Evidence from WTI, Brent, Dubai and Oman; Mohammad S. AlMadi, Baosheng Zhang, China Petroleum University Beijing, 2011 (Page 1-5)
10
An Anatomy of the Crude Pricing System, Bassam Fattouh, The Oxford Institute for Energy Studies, 01-2011 (Page 7)
11
12
In future markets the parties are anonymous, however, these markets are very liquid, so it is hard for one party to accumulate significant percentages in the volume in order to influence the market. The physical market is therefore much easier to squeeze, even though the parties evolved are known.
An Anatomy of the Crude Pricing System, Bassam Fattouh, The Oxford Institute for Energy Studies, 01-2011 (Page 7)
13 14
All of Corda Corporation's production is somehow linked to the WTI benchmark, and changes in WTI directly affect the revenues.
Source:
Database
-
IEA
PADD
Production
2011
In order to understand the US oil market, it is important to get the overview over the allocation of crudes in the US. The EIA divides the US into five "Petroleum Allocation for Defense Districts" (PADDs); these PADDs were defined in the Second World War. The most important PADD for the US crude production is PADD III, as it has large volumes of crude production and refining capacities. PADD II receives a special importance for the oil market, as PADD II has large crude storage facilities and refineries. PADD II can be divided into two subregions: Midcontinent with huge storage facilities and Midwest with refineries. The Midcontinent region is the heart of the storage facilities in the US and is gathering the crude 14
from
Oklahoma
to
Texas.
Cushing,
a
small
city
near
Oklahoma
City,
is
the
delivery
point
for
WTI
crude
future
contracts.
The
storage
capacity
of
Cushing
exceeds
45
million
barrels.
Acronym
Name
Type
API
Location
/
Composition
Benchmark
West Texas Intermediate Argus Sour Crude Index Light Louisiana Heavy Louisiana Deep-water Mars Poseidon West Texas Sour Southern Green Canyon
Light sweet crude Medium sour crude Light sweet crude Heavy sweet crude Sour and medium crude Sour and medium crude Medium sour crude Heavy sour crude
39.6 Cushing, Oklahoma 38 37 31 30 Mars, Poseidon, SGC Offshore US Gulf Coast Offshore US Gulf Coast Offshore US Gulf Coast
HLS
Mars
Poseidon
WTS SGC
As it is shown in the table above, there are a variety of important crudes in the US. However, most of these indices could not establish themselves as a leading benchmark. These crudes are defined by their physical characteristics and their production location. These popular crudes are mostly traded over the OTC market and measured by PRA in order to determine price differentials to the underlying benchmarks. Even though the US has a variety of crudes, WTI is the predominate benchmark. The WTI crude is produced in Texas, New Mexico, Oklahoma, and Kansas. The main difference between the WTI and Brent crude is that Brent is a waterborne crude, whereas WTI is a pipeline crude. Pipeline crudes like WTI have the advantage of a higher diversification in the physical market. As mentioned above, diversification plays a key role in the success of a benchmark. In the US the typical trading volume for a pipeline crude over the OTC market is around 30.000 barrel, a fraction when compared to the 600.000-barrel ship cargos traded on the Brent market. BOTTLENECK WTI However, the infrastructure of WTI cannot handle the traded volumes resulting in a physical bottleneck and in high price volatiles. Pipeline crudes have logistic- and storage- problems and are less flexible than waterborne crudes. Cushing is not accessible by tankers or ships. In history, the problem was to get enough oil into Cushing, resulting in a dislocation of the WTI price above international benchmarks. Nowadays, this problem has been solved and the problem has shifted in getting the crude out of Cushing to the refining hubs located in the Gulf of Mexico. The refineries around Cushing have a high utilization, and while supply is growing, refineries and pipelines are not.
15
2011 0.65571719 Brent is trading at a premium to WTI, as WTI has higher transportation and storage costs. The signs of this change began in mid 2007. As it can be seen in the graph above, WTI lost for a short time period the correlation to Brent beginning in January 2007 to July 2007. At that time, the explanation was that this shift would be temporary, caused by the impacts of the financial markets. It was not considered that these differences were the result of the physical limitations of Cushing. Besides, at this time imports, especially from Canada, were flooding the market, whereas North Sea production was steadily declining. In addition, the crude production in Midwest PADD II was rising due to the development of shale oil and gas, which became available through new technologies like horizontal drilling and more efficient ways of fracking. 15 As new crude reserves became available, the scarcity rent of crude declined, which resulted in a lower
What's the real price of oil?, Joachim Azria, Credit Suisse Fixed Income Research, 02-17-2012 (1-8)
15
16
world crude price. However, these crudes were not able to reach the world markets since pipeline facilities were missing (compare Hotelling rule). The table above shows that the correlation (Brent,WTI) in the years from 2006 to 2009 was always above 0.95. This changes in 2010, yet still there is a strong relationship between WTI and Brent. It can be seen that the relationship has begun to weaken. In 2011 this relationship changes from a strong relationship to a moderate relationship: 0.65. This is mainly due to the huge discounts on WTI over Brent.
Source:
Database
-
Crude
Imports
Report
Feb.
2012
from
EIA
Source:
Database
-
Crude
production
by
country
from
EIA
17
Source:
modified
from
Canadian
Association
of
Petroleum
Products,
Crude
Oil
Forecast
June
2011
Source:
Database
-
Petroleum
and
other
liquids,
stocks
from
EIA
18
In the following I want to show the impacts of Canadian crude imports on the WTI market. In 2011, almost 30% of crude imports came from Canada. Enbridge, a Canadian pipeline company, bought important pipelines in the US, like the 190-k bd Spearhead pipeline from Cushing to Chicago (red line in "Canadian and US Pipeline"). This pipeline system was pumping crude from the storage facilities of Cushing to the refineries in Chicago. Most of the Canadian crude imports are pumped towards Chicago and then to Cushing. Enbridge changed the flow of the Spearhead pipeline. Nowadays, Canadian crudes are transported from Chicago to Cushing over the 190-k bd Spearhead pipeline, resulting in a higher crude supply in Cushing. 16 It seems that this trend will extend in to the future, as Enbridge has new projects, like the expansion of the Flanagan South Pipeline, which will supply Cushing with more crude. The steady rise of the supply can be seen in the rise of stock inventories at Cushing, which are plotted in the graph above. If the supply in Cushing is rising, the costs for the storage are rising too. 17 One possibility of transporting the oversupply out of Cushing would be to transport it by railway or trucks to the US Gulf Coast. However, these ways of transportation are limited in their volume and only occur if the arbitrage between WTI and Brent is significant enough to equalize the higher transportation costs. Until there are no solutions found to debottleneck the oversupply in Cushing, the WTI crude will likely have a very volatile discounted relationship to Brent. Thus, investors will move their interest from WTI, towards Brent or ASCI. Additionally, this shift is supported by the negative roll yields in the short-term of WTI. It is interesting to take a closer look at the stock inventory during the financial crisis. Before the world financial crisis of 2008, crude inventories in Cushing were decreasing, while during the financial crisis, crude stocks were sharply rising as the demand was sinking. This underlines a positive correlation between the GDP growth rate and the stock storage in Cushing. If the WTI price is affected by local supply and demand in Cushing, WTI prices are not reflecting the supply and demand balance of the US or the world market. The WTI price in such a case would decouple from the Brent market. Further, the bottleneck of WTI directly impacts the revenues of Corda Corporation. The indices that are underlying for Corda Corporations crude production are all directly linked to WTI and have a high positive correlation. As a reaction to the WTI price volatilities in 2008, Saudi Aramco (NOC of Saudi Arabia), one of the leading exporters to the US, dropped WTI as their main benchmark in favor of the Argus Sour Crude Index (ASCI). This index was published by the price-reporting agency (PRA) Argus and is based on three types of US crudes: Mars, Poseidon, and Southern Green Canyon. The crudes from the ASCI are mostly located on the Gulf of Mexico, and thus they have not the logistical problems of a pipeline crude. The importance of the ASCI as the benchmark for the US crude market is rising on behalf of the WTI benchmark.
What's the real price of oil?, Joachim Azria, Credit Suisse Fixed Income Research, 02-17-2012 (Page 5)
16 17
RISING DEMAND
An Anatomy of the Crude Pricing System, Bassam Fattouh, The Oxford Institute for Energy Studies, 01-2011 (Page 11)
18
20
Source:
Database
-
from
World
Bank
World
Development
Indicators,
International
Financial
Statistics
of
the
IMF
The key driver for the demand of crude oil is the global economic growth.19 For example, during the financial crisis from 2008-2009, or during the dot-com crisis, the global demand for petroleum fell slightly. Still, the demand for petroleum had been growing rapidly by 12.6% over the last 10 years. As it can be seen in the graph above, the growth rate of crude production could not measure up with the GDP world growth rate. (Remember the graph - Cushing, stocks of crude and products and the impacts of the financial crisis)20
Source:
Database
-
Crude
Demand
2012
from
EIA
The rise of the demand side is largely driven by non-OECD and emerging markets with high GDP growth rates. The shift of oil flowing to Asia is remarkable. These economies have a high GDP
Interim Report on Crude Oil Interagency Task Force of Commodity Markets, Commodity Future Trading Commission, 06-2008 (Page 8)
19
Understanding Oil Prices - A Guide to What Drives the Price of Oil in Today's Markets, Salvatore Carollo, ISBN 978-119-96272-4, 2012 (Page 21-24)
20
21
growth, while simultaneously their economies are shifting from being labor-intensive towards oil-intensive. Additionally, many of the emerging markets, like Indonesia and India, are supporting their economy by price subsidies on fuel oil. Due to subsidies, the oil price in some emerging economies is set below the global oil price, and the demand is not adequately responding to price signals, resulting in a higher demand for crude oil.21
TIGHTER SUPPLY
Source:
Database
-
April
2012
Monthly
Energy
Review
from
EIA
On the other side, crude supply has not kept up with the crude demand. If crude prices are rising, oil reserves, which were not economical in times of low crude prices, will become available, and the crude supply will rise. In 2011 the non-OPEC crude production counted for 57.12%, with nearly 1/4 of this coming from Russia. The graph above shows the change in the production volumes in 2011 compared to 2000. While global demand and crude prices were rising, the non-OPEC countries, except Russia, couldnt keep their production in balance with the rising demand. The reason why the Russian production is sharply rising is due to private investments made after the fall of the Soviet Union. However, the graph shows that non-OPEC countries have passed the peak production, and that they are not able to hold the production levels from past decades, even with higher crude prices. OPEC producing countries and Russia are equalizing this imbalance of supply and demand. In order to supply the growing demand, OPEC has increased their production from 2000 to 2011 by 2.71 million barrels per day. However, the "call on OPEC," which is defined as the world
Oil Subsidies: Costly and Rising, Benedict Clemens, David Coady, John Piotrowiski, International Monetary Fund, 06-2010
21
22
consumption, subtracted by the non-OPEC production, has increased over the same period to over 7.07 million barrels per day. This imbalance results in tighter markets. 22 However, as it is getting more difficult to explore conventional crudes, OPEC production growth rates are slowing down. And in order to replace the production of conventional crudes, unconventional crudes have to be explored. Unconventional crudes are difficult to explore and are causing higher production costs. Unconventional crudes are all the crudes not produced from a classical wellhead. According to the IEA, unconventional crudes can have the following sources: Oil sands (i.e. Alaska) Oil shale (i.e. Forth-Worth Basin in Texas) Coal based liquid (i.e. German production in the Second World War) Biomass based liquids (i.e. Brazil) Natural gas based liquids
Expectations play a major role in the financial market and in the crude market. The current crude spot price should be based on expectations in the future, making changes in the price hard to predict.23 In the crude market there are a lot of uncertainties about the future in oil supply and demand. These uncertainties lead to a risk premium and increase demand, as the parties involved are gathering crudes and storing it for uncertain times. As a result, the oil price in future markets can differ from its true underlying value and may cause a crude bubble like in 2008.24 The result is an imbalance in rising demands and declining supply. This imbalance is likely to rise in the future and is the main reason for large and rapid price increases in order to reestablish the equilibrium between supply and demand.
22Database: 23
Interim Report on Crude Oil Interagency Task Force of Commodity Markets, Commodity Future Trading Commission, 06-2008 (Page4) Price of Oil: Manipulation? Bubble? Supply/Demand?, Natural Resources, 0606-2008 (Page 2-3)
24
23
INVENTORIES
24
Correlation between WTI-Price and US-Crude Stocks -0.527304116 0.389332895 0.8459272 -0.261635432
Source: Database - US Stock history from EIA WTI pricing from NYMEX spot
One indicator that is used by crude market experts to predict future price developments is the US-Stock inventory. In order to determine if there is any correlation between crudestocks and crude prices, I plotted the WTI crude prices from different time periods to the crude oil inventories in the US. After the Hotelling theory, crude oil prices and inventories should have had a negative correlation. This means if crude inventories are rising, crude prices should be decreasing, and the other way around, everything else equal. The plot above shows that there is little systematic relationship between oil inventories and oil prices, especially in the last time period from 2006 to 2011. Furthermore, the correlation of the different time periods seems to vary. In the first period, from 1992 to 1996, there is a moderate negative correlation, which changes in the next five-year period to a weak positive correlation. This positive correlation cannot be explained by theory. Furthermore, in the period of 2002 2006, the correlation is high positive, whereas in the last period, the correlation changes again to a weak negative covariance. The relationship between crude inventories and crude pricing is not clear, and therefore, US crude inventories fail if used for future price predictions. 25 This plot diagram may show some evidence that speculation has an increasing impact on crude pricing. In the last period, from 2006 to 2011 it seems that there is almost no correlation between rising oil prices and US stock inventories. In past periods, the dots in the graph were closer together. Through excessive speculation, the future price would be above the equilibrium. This would result in higher stocks, as production would rise and demand would fall. Further, rising inventories could be interpreted in that way, that the market believes, that there is a relatively low scarcity today and that there will be a supply shortfall in the future. Otherwise, the market would have no need to hold crude inventories, as inventories have to compensate storage costs and interest costs.
SPARE
CAPACITY
The
party
who
controls
the
crude
spare
capacity
sets
the
crude
prices.
The
controlling
party
can
be
a
superficial
organization
that
sets
quotas
on
oil
like
the
TRC
and
OPEC
or
a
private
company,
The Role of Speculation in Oil Markets: What have we learned so far?, Bassam Fattouh, Lutz Kilian, Lavan Mahadeva, Oxford Institute for Energy Studies, 03-182012 (Page 13)
25
25
like the Standard Oil Company. However, these parties can only influence the oil supply as long as they have spare capacity and as long as they are taking on the role of a swing producer.
Source:
Database
-
Short
Term
Outlook
May
2012
from
EIA
Today, OPEC countries still serve as a swing producer in the world crude market. The majority of the world crude production comes from National Oil Companies (NOC), like Saudi Aramco, a member of the OPEC. 26 However, there are concerns that OPEC countries are producing over the optimal production rate in order to stabilize the markets and that they are not able to serve as a swing producer in the long run. As seen in the graph above, OPEC surplus capacity stays low. Surplus capacities were sharply rising due to the world recession. These capacities are consumed and will decline to the lows before the recession. The spare capacity of 3.02 MBPD in 2011 is equivalent to 3.46% of the world crude consumption. This puts pressure on the supply market and on the crude price. Further, it is unclear who will take the role of the swing producer in the future; there may not be one. Besides, this low surplus capacity is also concentrated in a few OPEC countries, with Saudi Arabia holding the largest share, resulting in a higher geopolitical risk, because there is a lower diversification.
26
Database: Global Crude Oil and Liquid Fuels, IEA Short Term Outlook June 2012 26
GEOPOLITICAL UNCERTAINTY
Source:
Database
-
International
Energy
Statistics;
Total
oil
Supply
from
EIA
Oil production is highly concentrated in a few countries; this results in a higher risk of disruptions, as there is a lower diversification. In addition, in 2011, six of the ten largest crude- producing countries were either ruled by communistic parties or had nationalized their oil production and thus, have limited access to private investments. 27 Nationalized oil companies (NOC) have different aims compared to the private oil companies. The main aim in the private sector is to yield high returns, reached through a full and q uick development of oil prospects, with enhanced experts and technology. On the other hand, nationalized oil companies are driven by political agendas and public interests. Therefore, private oil companies would be more efficient in the supply of crude. 1 This phenomenon is described by the Hotelling rule of a monopoly supply, which will be discussed later. Geopolitical disruptions frequently appear in oil-supplying countries. It seems that oil-supplying countries are addicted to being unstable. During the last two years there have been over a dozen supply disruptions, lasting from a few days to a few months. These disruptions mainly occurred in the Middle East.
Interim Report on Crude Oil Interagency Task Force of Commodity Markets, Commodity Future Trading Commission, 06-2008 (Page 13)
27
27
Source:
unplanned
production
disruptions
from
U.S.
Energy
Information
Administration
In the first quarter of 2012, four countries were responsible for the main unplanned production disruption: Canada, Libya, Sudan, and South Sudan. In 2011 Libya was holding in almost their entire oil production of about 1.65 mbbl/day due to a civil war, resulting in a crude price drive in the end of 2011. However, the situation in Libya got under control, and the offline production in April 2012 went down to 350 mbbl/day. In July 2011, South Sudan became independent from Sudan. Sudan and South Sudan had an argument over the pipeline transit fee, and South Sudan shut down their entire production of 460 tbbl/d.28 The disruption in Canada was caused by technical upgrades in the Alberta oil sand production facility in the mid of March and unplanned repair from February until March at the Horizon Oil Sand production facility. The analysis of the first quarter of 2012 shows that disruptions occur frequently and randomly. Political disruptions have long-term impacts on the crude supply compared to short-term technical disruptions. These supply disruptions directly affect the physical oil market and lead to a shortage in supply. Through the limited spare capacity, geopolitical problems cannot always be absorbed resulting in crude price jumps.
Crude Oil: The Shifting of Global Supply Disruptions, Where Food comes from, 418-2012
28
28
WEATHER
UNCERTAINTY
In
addition
to
geopolitical
uncertainties,
there
are
weather
uncertainties
which
can
have
huge
impacts
on
the
supply
side.
Weather
uncertainties
are
relatively
similar
to
geopolitical
uncertainties,
as
they
occur
frequently
and
randomly.
These
uncertainties
include
flooding,
earthquakes,
and
hurricanes.
These
disruptions
impact
the
crude
production,
refineries,
or
the
transportation
system.
One
typical
example
of
a
weather
uncertainty
is
the
frequently
occurring
disruptions
during
the
hurricane
season
in
the
Gulf
of
Mexico
from
June
to
November.
EXCHANGE
RATES
The
crude
price
and
the
exchange
rates
are
both
variables
that
generate
a
significant
impact
on
the
real
economy.
The
relationship
between
the
crude
oil
price
and
the
exchange
rates
is
complex,
and
causality
can
affect
each
other.
29Crude
is
typically
priced
in
dollars,
and
a
depreciation
of
the
dollar
leads
to
a
rise
in
the
oil
price;
all
other
factors
are
equal.
For
example,
if
the
value
of
the
dollar
depreciates
against
other
currencies,
it
could
boost
foreign
demand.
Additionally,
foreign
oil
exporters
could
suffer
in
their
purchasing
power
of
their
earning.
Thus,
these
exchange
rate
movements
are
canceling
each
other
out.
The
United
States
has
changed
over
time,
from
being
a
net
oil
exporter
to
a
net
oil
importer,
and
this
counts
not
only
for
their
oil
imports.
The
United
States
has
a
significant
trade
d eficit,
resulting
in
increasing
concerns
about
the
sustainability
of
the
US
d ollar,
and
it
sets
the
oil
price
against
other
currencies
under
pressure.
Source:
Database:
Yahoo
finance
(US.Dollar
index);
IEA
(WTI
Spot
Price)
Interim Report on Crude Oil Interagency Task Force of Commodity Markets, Commodity Future Trading Commission, 06-2008 (Page 14)
29
29
The above graph plots the WTI spot price and the U.S. dollar index performance since the beginning of November 2011. It seems that the negative correlation between the dollar and the oil price is lost over the time period of March YEAR??? to the beginning of May 2012. The latest tensions between Iran and the West have resulted in a rise of the oil prices. While the U.S. dollar index gained as the European currency struggled, in May 2012 the correlation snapped back to a normal negative correlation. The latest development shows that crude price developments are unpredictable and that long-term relationships and indicators can change in the short run.30
INTEREST
RATES
The
impact
of
changes
in
the
interest
rates,
set
by
the
FED
on
the
oil
price,
is
not
evident.
There
are
many
studies
about
how
the
interest
rate
influences
the
oil
price,
and
their
results
differ.
However,
a
decline
in
the
interest
rates
tends
to
lead
to
a
raise
in
the
oil
price,
all
other
factors
equal.
One
explanation
for
the
phenomena
is
that,
if
interest
rates
are
declining,
costs
for
oil- storing
inventory
are
sinking,
and
thus,
the
temporary
demand
is
rising.
Furthermore,
oil
demand
in
general
will
rise
due
to
a
higher
economic
activity.
Of
course
this
phenomena
will
not
occur
if
the
reason
for
the
decline
in
the
interest
rates
is
due
to
a
struggling
economy
where
low
interest
rates
boost
the
economy.
In
a
crisis,
the
oil
demand
will
decrease
and
thus
the
oil
price
will
decrease.
The
federal
fund
rate
is
still
0.25%
almost
four
years
after
the
financial
crisis.
Nowadays,
these
low
interest
rates
may
not
be
impacted
as
much
from
the
financial
downturn
of
2008
and
result
in
a
rising
oil
demand
and
oil
price.
Ties That Bind Oil and Dollar Snap, Christian Berthelsen, The Wall Street Journal, (03-07-2012) 31 Nonrenewable Resource Scarcity, Jeffrey A. Krautkraemer, Journal of Economic Literature, Dec. 1998 (Page 1-10)
30
30
proposes that stock prices reflect all available information. Further, it assumes that producers are price takers and could sell any quantity at the market price. Inexhaustible resource:
Pt
=
MCt
Exhaustible
resource:
Pt
=
MCt
+
P0(1+r)
As
oil
is
a
non-renewable
good,
the
producer
has
the
option
of
leaving
the
crude
in
the
ground
for
future
production
or
producing
the
crude
today
and
receiving
interest
(r)
on
the
yields.
The
producer
will
hold
the
oil
as
a
reserve
if
he
believes
that
the
future
price
will
be
above
the
interest
rate
(r).
Source:
ON
THE
ECONOMICS
OF
NON-RENEWABLE
RESOURCES
If the crude price were to rise slower than the interest rate, producers would sell off their stocks in order to receive the interest. If the crude price were to rise faster, producers would hold their stocks for the future. As seen in the left graph above, the market would get tighter and prices would rise exponentially. Furthermore, as prices rise, the production rates would continuously fall, as the resource stock gets exhausted (left graph). 32 The demand, on the other hand, would be cut off at a certain price level and in order to sell crude, the producers would have to decrease the crude price. In this model, the quantity produced would be the result of the equilibrium of the price rises in crude and the exponential interest (r). It makes no difference between selling a barrel today or at a future point. 33 34
Natural Resource Economics under the Rule of Hotelling, The Canadian Journal of Economics, Vol 40, No 4., 11-2007 (Page 1043)
32
On the Economics of Non-Renewable Resources, Neha Khanna , Invited contribution to Encyclopedia of Life and Social Sciences, UNESCO. Forthcoming,
33
31
However, there are four variables that confuse this steady development: Fluctuations in demand Changes in the extraction costs New crude discoveries Alternative fuels (backstop technology)
Rt=Pt-MCt
Production
costs
would
decrease
as
new
technologies,
like
horizontal
drilling
or
advanced
fracking
methods,
promise
a
higher
recovery.
As
a
result
of
decreasing
production
costs,
net
prices
can
decrease
in
the
short-term,
as
long
as
sinking
production
costs
are
outweighing
the
rising
scarcity
rent.
Yet,
after
all
this,
the
prices
would
rise
even
quicker,
as
the
resource
would
be
exhausted
more
quickly.
Production
cost
would
rise,
since
it
would
be
getting
harder
to
produce
conventional
crude.
There
are
still
new
discoveries
of
conventional
crudes.
However,
these
discoveries
are
in
remote
places,
and
the
production
has
to
move
to
locations
of
extreme
conditions,
like
to
the
offshore
fields
of
the
Gulf
of
Mexico
or
to
fields
near
the
Arctic.
If
conventional
crude
were
depleted,
expensive
unconventional
crude
resources
would
have
to
be
produced.
Petrobras finds new offshore oil reserves, Oil and Gas Technology, 03-13-2012 32
Resources are the total amount of undiscovered and discovered oil. They contain the produced oil as well as future predictions. Reserves are a part of the resources and are the economically and technically producible in the future. OOIP URR EUR Reserves Original Oil in Place Ultimate Recoverable Resources Estimated Ultimately Recoverable Proven Probable Possible Total Oil Resources Produced + Reserves 90 % probability 50-89 % probablity 10-49 % probability
BACKSTOP
TECHNOLOGY
A
backstop
technology
is
a
substitute
for
the
non-renewable
resource,
like
ethanol
from
sugar
in
order
to
use
as
crude.
36This
resource
can
be
produced
at
any
quantity
if
the
price
reaches
a
certain
level.
When
the
price
of
crude
is
higher
than
the
price
of
the
renewable
energy,
the
demand
will
switch
to
the
renewable
energy
source.
This
switch
can
be
seen
in
the
oil
market.
High
volatility
and
rising
crude
prices
in
the
past
decade
have
led
to
higher
interest
in
non-conventional
transportations
fuels,
like
biofuels,
GTL
fuels,
and
CTL
fuels.
As
a
result,
the
crude
market
has
rising
impacts
on
the
corn
market,
and
the
correlation
between
these
markets
is
increasing.
Crude Oil Price Forecasting: A Statistical Approach, Armando Lara, Michael Leger, John Auers, National Petrochemical & Refiners Association, 03-18-2012 (Page 6)
36
33
Source:
ON
THE
ECONOMICS
OF
NON-RENEWABLE
RESOURCES
IMPACTS
OF
A
MONOPOLY
Lets
assume
OPEC
has
a
monopoly
market
position.
In
this
situation,
crude
prices
would
be
higher
in
general
and
would
rise
more
slowly,
as
the
extraction
would
be
slower.
It
is
assumed
that
a
monopoly
would
not
complete
the
resource
as
fast
as
it
would
in
a
competitive
market,
and
thus,
oil
production
would
last
longer.
Todays
crude
market
is
far
from
a
monopoly
market
structure
and
is
more
characterized
by
perfect
competition.
On
a
country-based
view,
there
are
monopoly
structures
with
NOC
controlling
the
entire
local
production.
37The
governments
of
these
countries
will
adjust
their
production
rates
to
their
political
agendas
and
will
extract
their
crude
reserves
more
slowly
than
private
companies
would.
However,
they
are
acting
independent
from
other
governments
nationalized
oil
companies.
The
crude
market
was,
with
the
Standard
Oil
Company,
a
monopoly
market.
OPEC
countries
as
a
whole
never
had
a
monopoly
position,
as
the
members
were
not
acting
as
a
group.
OPEC
members
were
acting
independently
from
the
group
decision.
This
phenomenon
is
also
known
as
the
"Prisoner's
Dilemma:"
every
country
is
acting
in
its
best
interest,
so
every
party
has
an
incentive
to
cheat
on
their
production
quotas.
On the State's Choice of Oil Company: Risk Management and the Frontier of the Petroleum Industry, Peter A. Nolan and Mark C. Thurber, Program on Energy and Sustainable Development, 12-2010 (S4)
37
34
PRICE
VOLATILITY
In
the
following
I
want
to
determine
the
price
volatility
and
the
impacts
on
crude
producers.
Interim Report on Crude Oil Interagency Task Force of Commodity Markets, Commodity Future Trading Commission, 06-2008 (Page 14)
38
Understanding Crude Oil Prices, Matt Nesvisky , The National Bureau of Economic Research, 06-12-2012
39
35
Source:
Database
-
spot
WTI
from
IEA
The graph above shows the volatility of crude prices in the last decade. Most of the peaks are due to economical booms or recessions. The abnormal peak in 2009 was caused by the world financial crisis. However, it seems that these peaks are getting bigger over time.
The daily returns of WTI crude oil are plotted in the graph above. It can be seen that these returns are not following a normal distribution. The standard deviation is relatively low, which means that the majority of returns are clustered around the median. Furthermore, the 36
distribution is left skewed. This implies that most of the values are concentrated on the right of the mean, with extreme values to the left. The results from this graph are characteristic for crude pricing. It shows that huge negative fat tails disrupt the general trend. 40 In the last period of low oil prices in 1999, many of the major oil companies were moving their focus out of the United States as the recovering costs were too high. For example, the cost of recovering one barrel of crude out of the Gulf of Mexico is roughly $12, compared to OPEC countries, that have production costs of less than $2. 41 The oil business in general is a very volatile business, mostly depending on the actual oil price. Oil and gas producers are drilling circadian. They are spending too much money for drilling or the acquisition of new plays during times of high oil prices, resulting in a short cash flow during times with low oil prices. These producers have questionable methods for reducing fixed costs. During periods of low oil prices, it may be economical to "shut in" a well and wait for higher oil prices in order to eliminate the fix costs for keeping up the well structure. However, there is the risk that the reservoir is damaged during the closing time and has to be re-drilled.42 Besides, the exploration and production company may not be able to shut a well in for a longer time period, as the company has to pay back the drilling and completion costs to investors and banks. The costs for drilling an onshore vertical well in Texas are roughly about $300,000 and the costs for completion are about $100,000 In order to refinance these expenditures it is important to have a continuous return flow. Another possibility of reducing fix costs during periods of low oil prices would be to lay off personal like oil engineers and geologist in times of low oil prices. This strategy is used by many majors and second tier integrated. They have huge layoffs and employments, depending on the oil price. Of course, circadian fire and hire employee politic are not sustainable and great institutional knowledge is getting lost. Institutional knowledge is a crucial factor in the competitive advantage of an oil company. In the oil business, every play in a region has its special characteristics i.e. the formations or service companies. The management of Corda Corporation realized that these firing and hiring cycles were extremely costly for the company and made it to their advantage. The corporation is very lean managed and has only one engineering office in Wichita Falls. The director of the engineering office in Wichita Falls, Paul Leming, followed the footsteps of his father-in-law and has been working for Corda Corporation for 10 years. Thus he has a huge experience in the local oil fields
World Crude Oil Markets: Monetary Policy and the Recent Oil Shock ,Noureddine Krichene , IMF Working Paper, 03-2006 (Page 10-20)
40 41 42
and the local structure. If the workload reaches the capacity of Corda Corporation, work is outsourced to local companies. RESTRUCTURING OF CORDA CORP Even more affected by the price changes are the suppliers of the oil producer, like for example the drilling rigs. Quoting Mr. DeCleva junior: "The oil service43 industry, are the last who are benefiting from high oil prices and the first who get out of business, if the prices go down." As explained above, most oil E&P firms nowadays do not own the drilling rigs. These services are outsourced. The business of drilling rig companies is more volatile than the E&P business. If the oil prices are high, drilling rigs are booked over 12 months in advanced, whereas if the price goes down, many oil plays are not economical for development, leaving the rigs tied up at the docks. Corda Corporation had to make this experience in the 1980s. Besides the exploration and production risk Corda Corporation had to manage the risks arriving out of the oil service industry. During the 1980ts the oil industry was near its margin of substance. Due to a massive oil oversupply in the mid 1980s oil prices were tumbling to new lows and so did the profits of most oil businesses. Many oil firms, especially mid and small sized firms had to declare bankruptcy. Corda Corporation and its affiliates were running three drilling rigs and a payroll of 30 employees, mostly roughnecks, engineers and geophysics. In 1986, Corda and its affiliates sold its drilling rigs at a steep discount, thereby allowing it to focus exclusively on prospectives and exploration. Rig services were outsourced and Corda Corporation had to reduce staff and overhead. Corda Corporation went back to a long-term oriented view with lean structures. This policy still dictates today's decisions and set a basis to the success of today's business.
Reservoir Digs: on energy investing and private equity, JP Morgan, 03-22-2012 (Page 1-2)
43
38
producer and the consumer some kind of confidence that the crude price was grounded in the physical dimension of the market rather than set by oil majors or OPEC. Over time this led to the complex and interlinked structure with the spot market, futures and options. In todays world the price of the benchmarks cannot be isolated from financial layers. Spot cargos, for immediate delivery of crude are rare. 46 Through the high volatility of crude prices and their huge impacts on the daily business, the need for the producer evolves to roll over the risks to the market. By using derivatives the oil producer can focus on their strengths and build out their comparative advantage while they don't have to worry about the short-term price volatility.
OTC
DERIVATIVE
The
International
Organization
of
Securities
Commissions
(IOSCO)
reported
in
2010
that
45%
of
the
trades
in
crude
or
petroleum
products
were
over
the
OTC
market;
the
remaining
was
traded
over
exchanges.
In
the
OTC
markets
in
general
there
are
more
physical
traders,
including
producers,
refineries,
downstream
consumers,
and
physical
traders.
Financial
players
are
trading
for
the
purpose
of
speculation
and
are
marginally
presented
in
the
OTC
market.
However,
more
and
more
OTC
deals
are
traded
over
clearing
houses.
The
OTC
market
has
shifted
from
a
market
where
parties
were
negotiating
over
brokers
or
face-to-face
to
a
market
over
electronic
OTC
and
became
more
similar
to
exchange
markets.
There
are
two
main
OTC
derivatives
for
crude:
forwards
and
swaps.
I
will
focus
especially
on
the
forward
market,
as
the
forward
market
sets
the
price
differentials.
An Anatomy of the Crude Pricing System, Bassam Fattouh, The Oxford Institute for Energy Studies, 01-2011 (Page 6)
45
An Anatomy of the Crude Pricing System, Bassam Fattouh, The Oxford Institute for Energy Studies, 01-2011 (Page 7)
46
39
One
popular
forward
is
the
21-day
BFOE
contract.
For
example,
the
producer
of
a
Brent
field
can
sell
on
the
forward
market
one
cargo,
600.000
barrel
of
the
projected
field
production
of
July
in
May.
After
the
loading
schedule
is
finalized
the
purchaser
receives
at
least
21
days
before
the
actual
loading
date
-
a
notice
of
the
exact
three-day
loading
window.
The
purchaser
of
the
cargo
of
crude
may
not
want
to
receive
a
physical
load
of
crude
and
thus
he
sells
his
contract
before
expiration
and
is
booking
his
position
out.
The
purchaser,
who
is
holding
the
21
days
BFOE
beyond
the
expiration
date,
has
to
take
the
physical
delivery.
When
the
delivery
date
is
known,
the
21-days
BFOE
cargo
turns
into
a
Dated
Brent
cargo.
Dated
Brent,
Dated
BFOE,
Dated
North
Sea
Light
(Platts),
or
Argus
North
S ea
Dated
refer
all
to
the
spot
market,
where
a
cargo
has
a
specific
loading
date.
However,
Dated
Brent
contracts
are
not
delivered
immediately
and
still
have
a
forward
element
that
can
be
traded.
In
fact,
the
Dated
Brent
price
published
reflects
the
price
of
crude,
delivered
between
10
and
21
days
ahead.
For
example,
the
Dated
Brent
on
the
May
first
represents
the
price
for
crude
delivered
on
May
11
until
May
22.
The
linkage
between
the
forward
Brent
market
and
the
Dated
Brent
market
is
through
the
Contracts
for
Difference
(CFD)
swap
market.
In
the
CFD
market
buyers
and
sellers
can
swap
differences
between
positions
of
the
Dated
Brent
and
forward
Brent.
47
Understanding Oil Prices - A Guide to What Drives the Price of Oil in Today's Markets, Salvatore Carollo, ISBN 978-119-96272-4, 2012 (Page 94-100)
47
An Anatomy of the Crude Pricing System, Bassam Fattouh, The Oxford Institute for Energy Studies, 01-2011 (Page 7-31)
48
40
decide which information they are using. Thus, physical indices have a big element of subjectivity. For instance, ASCI, the main index from Argus, and an important benchmark for US markets, is mainly based on observed deals during a day. The Platt's index has the same underlying data, however Platt's method differs from the Argus method, as Platt's only looks at deals in a certain time window. Platt's was using a volume-weighted average pricing system until 2001, when it changed to the market-on-close (MOC) methodology. The problem of the volume-weighted average pricing system used by Argus, is that it is always representing prices in the past, and thus it is lagging behind. This is especially a problem in high volatile markets. In the MOC system, there is a certain time window in which the markets are analyzed. The criticism about the MOC system is that involved parties may change their trading strategy in order to influence the benchmark, thus it would not be a reliable source for the physical market. This time window will only represent a fraction of the real market transactions and trading parties. The traders could for example, accept higher or lower offers during the Platt's time window. This would distort the market price. The losses made during the time window could be easily compensated over extern derivatives as the price direction is known. There are concerns about the huge influence of the PRA on the oil commodity market. In November 2010 the influences of the PRAs were discussed by the G20 and analyzes were done by the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO).49 The result is that PRAs are under a special oversight of the IOSCO and the G20 governments have imposed more control on the oil markets. PRAs, like Argus or Platts, are private companies, each having their own methodology of assessing prices. The difference of one to another PRA benchmark is over time less than one dollar. However, on the daily time, the differences for the same benchmark can be significant and has important implications on the export earning respectively on the financial flows of the involved parties.50
FUTURE
MARKET
The
advantages
of
standardized
futures
over
forwards
are
that
the
exchange
matches
the
parties
and
takes
over
the
counterparty
risk
resulting
in
a
higher
liquid
market.
On
the
other
hand,
forwards
have
the
advantage
that
they
are
more
flexible
in
their
contract
agreements
like
location,
price,
or
time.
For
example,
WTI
crude
is
priced
in
Cushing,
Oklahoma.
The
entering
party
in
the
future
contract
has
to
take
over
the
responsibilities
of
delivering
the
crude
to
Cushing
even
if
the
crude
goes
to
a
refinery
on
the
Gulf
Coast.
An Anatomy of the Crude Pricing System, Bassam Fattouh, The Oxford Institute for Energy Studies, 01-2011 (Page 30)
49 50
Oil price agency Platts too powerful, regulator told, Reuters, 04-05-2012 41
Future and option trading is mostly done through the electronic platform GLOBEX. The advantage of GLOBEX over an open outcry system is that GLOBEX provides access to a larger range of people and is almost around the clock. It is important to link both, the forward and the future market, in order to ensure the efficiency of the crude market. The oil price in a forward market is linked over the Exchange for Physicals market (EFP) to future contracts.
42
Source:
Database
-
Crude
Production
2011
from
IEA
The graph above plots the WTI and Brent future curve from the view of May 17, 2012. The steps of the Brent future curve occur due to different time periods of WTI and Brent. These two curves differ significantly. The bottleneck of WTI mentioned above and the resulting storage problems changed the WTI future curve. This is why the future curve of WTI crude begins with a contango and then changes after three months to backwardation. The formula for determining the price of a future is:
F0
=
S0
e(r+u-y)^T
Where
(F0)
is
todays
future
price,
(S0e)
is
todays
spot
price,
(r)
is
the
riskless
rate,
(u)
the
costs
for
storage,
(y)
the
convenience
yields,
and
(T)
the
time
from
now
to
the
expiration
date.
(r)
and
(u)
are
also
known
as
the
"costs
of
carry."
In
order
that
the
future
price
is
lower
than
the
spot
price,
(F0
)
<
(S0e,)
the
convenience
yields
have
to
be
higher
than
the
riskless
rate
and
the
costs
for
storage.
Furthermore,
(F0)
declines
as
(T)
gets
larger.
If
futures
are
in
backwardation,
it
means
that
there
is
an
advantage
of
physically
having
the
crude,
rather
than
on
paper.
What
is
the
advantage
of
physically
having
the
crude?
In
order
to
understand
the
advantages
of
physical
crude,
I
have
to
take
a
closer
look
at
the
crude
characteristics.51
Crude
is
characterized
by:
Crude
is
actually
consumed,
unlike
gold,
which
is
mainly
for
a
financial
commodity
Actual
consume
is
highly
volatile
and
is
driven
by
a
variety
of
parameters
Crude
inventories
are
relatively
low
Futures Pricing- Contango and Backwardation, Jim Finnegan, Chartered Financial Analyst, 43
51Commodity
Consuming, in the short run, is price inelastic The supply has a high risk of disruptions Inventories for crude are expensive
Crude has high costs of carry, as it has high costs for storage and a high riskless rate. Crude can be used conditional as a security and if only with an advance payment resulting in a higher riskless rate. This would favor future price curves to be in contango. The high costs of carry, especially in the commodities market, are the reason why most commodity future curves are in contango. As mentioned above, oil supply and demand are full of uncertainties. The supply side has to guarantee that the demand for refined products is always met, independent from supply disruptions or higher demands. As supply has to be guaranteed in order to fulfill contracts, the suppliers can't take the risk of selling inventory and buying future contracts. According to Dr. John Hull the convenience yield of crude futures reflect the markets expectations concerning the future availability of the commodity. The greater the possibility that shortages will occur during the life of the futures contract, the higher the convenience yield. Therefore, convenience yields occur out of the risk aversion of the supplying party.52 However, this explanation only applies to physical parties and not to the financial speculator on the future market. What is the convenience yield for the financial speculator in crude? One explanation comes from John Maynard Keynes. Keynes argues that speculators are acting out of the same intention of risk aversion as physical parties. The physical parties are holding crude inventories and are selling futures out of the purpose of risk hedging. Speculators buy these futures, and they have to carry the risk. The risk was rolled over from the physical parties to the financial parties.
Commodity Futures Pricing- Contango and Backwardation, Jim Finnegan, Chartered Financial Analyst
52
44
Crude future curves are not always in backwardation. However, during the last decade the future curves have been mostly in backwardation. If future curves are in backwardation, roll yields can be made, as the expiration dates come closer, the future price is rises. They are the difference between future prices and spot prices. The historical development of roll yields can be seen in the graph above. In November 2008, due to the financial crisis, the future curves changed and stayed in contango until October 2011. The crude future curve was in contango as the market became less tight and crude prices fell. The result was that the crude prices and the absolute convenience yields sank, while the absolute costs of carry stayed the same. But, the relative carry costs increased compared to the crude price. Thus, the carry costs outweighed the convenience yields, resulting in a contango future curve.
Source:
Database
on
IEA
Future
price
and
CME
WTI
crude
Spot
price
45
In the two graphs above, future curves at different times are compared. The data was taken on May 22 1987, and every 5 years after that, until May 22 2012. Contract 1 is in the nearest future for the next month in our example for June, contract 2 is for July, and so on. The future curves changed during this time period from backwardation in 1987 and 1992 to a more horizontal future curve.
The Role of Speculation in Oil Markets: What have we learned so far?, Bassam Fattouh, Lutz Kilian, Lavan Mahadeva, Oxford Institute for Energy Studies, 03-182012 (Page1)
53
An Anatomy of the Crude Pricing System, Bassam Fattouh, The Oxford Institute for Energy Studies, 01-2011 (Page 6-20)
54
46
The Role of Speculation in Oil Markets: What have we learned so far?, Bassam Fattouh, Lutz Kilian, Lavan Mahadeva, Oxford Institute for Energy Studies, 03-182012 (Page 2-10)
55
Interim Report on Crude Oil Interagency Task Force of Commodity Markets, Commodity Future Trading Commission, 06-2008 (Page 17)
56
An Anatomy of the Crude Pricing System, Bassam Fattouh, The Oxford Institute for Energy Studies, 01-2011 (Page 9)
57
47
Source:
Monthly
Crude
Report
from
CTFTC
(May-2012)
The U.S. Commodity Future Trading Commission (CFTC) publishes the Commitments of Traders Report each week. In this report the parties involved in the future market are analyzed and divided into two groups: first the commercial participants include producers manufacturers and swap dealers. These parties are acting out of the purpose of hedging and second, the non- commercial parties, include hedge funds, floor brokers, and traders. These parties are speculating in the oil market. The first two graphs, commercial open interest and non- commercial open interest, show the open interest in oil futures. In the second two graphs, the net positions of the commercial and non-commercial parties can be seen. Commercial parties are generally short, whereas non-commercial participants are net long (see mutual funds). If the development of the open interest of both parties is compared, it becomes clear that the non-
48
commercial parties gained on weight in the future pricing. Thus, the long futures of the non- commercial parties could drive the future market.58 The mutual fund and hedge funds play an important role for the future market as they enter positions over long time p eriods. Both of these parties act out of financial speculation. By rolling their entire position forward on a regular basis, they can increase the pressure on the crude price. The interest of hedge funds in the commodity market increased over time as the expectations of the investors changed. In the past, hedge fund returns were compared to the returns of popular indexes like the Dow Jones or the S&P 500. Nowadays, hedge funds are assessed by their absolute returns, and the expectations on the hedge fund yields increased. Hedge funds have a rising interest in commodity assets, as they have, compared to stocks, a higher volatility with the opportunity of higher returns.1 Mutual funds are only allowed to enter into long p ositions, resulting in a long position bulge. As mentioned above, in order to ground the paper market with the physical market, both markets are linked. From the paper market there is a lot of information, impacting the forward market. Thus the question remains whether the paper market drives the forward market or the other way around. In February 2012 at a crude price of $108, Forbes magazine estimated that more than 21%, $23.39, was due to speculation on the crude price. 59 Forbes based its calculation on the assumption of Goldman Sachs estimates. Goldman Sachs believes that every million barrels of speculation adds $0.10 to the actual crude price. In the mid of February the held positions for crude speculations on the NYMEX where $233.9 Mio and thus, the Forbes magazine concludes that this equals $23.39 or 21% speculation on the actual crude price level.
The Role of Speculation in Oil Markets: What have we learned so far?, Bassam Fattouh, Lutz Kilian, Lavan Mahadeva, Oxford Institute for Energy Studies, 03-182012 (Page 5-10)
58
Speculation In Crude Oil Adds $23.39 To The Price Per Barrel, Robert Lenzner, Forbes Staff 02-27-2012
59
49
ETFs, ETNs, and ETCs are examples of investment instruments for the layman wishing to speculate in crude commodities. In the following I want to show that new financial innovations like ETFs are attracting the broad public. These investments are mainly in the future market and directly affect the physical market.1 One example of an easy way for a layman to invest in commodities is ETFs; they offer diversification and are traded like stocks. ETFs, compared to futures, don't require a daily management, as they are not rolled over on the expiration date. Further, ETFs have the advantage for a small investor, because the face value is very high. Thus smaller investors can use ETSs for the diversification of their portfolio (vs. on future contract of 1000 barrel). Popular Crude ETFs United States Oil Fund LP ProShares Ultra DJ-AIG Crude ETF iPath S&P GSCI Crude Total Return PowerShares DB Oil Fund United States 12 Month Oil Fund There are three different ways of how ETFs are linked to commodities: I) They can be linked to the p hysical spot price of a commodity, which is the case with most metals II) ETFs are linked to the future market III) They can invest in equity of commodity intensive companies. Crudes future are general in backwardation. Thus, most crude ETFs are linked to the future market, as they gain roll yields. F urthermore, ETFs differ from their dated time to the maturity, resulting in a variety of different products. In general, shorter dated ETFs have a higher correlation to the spot price. ETFs with a long-term expiry are affected by substantial changes in the crude market, like a rising demand in emerging economies or a long-term shortage in supply, resulting in a h igher volatility in short-dated ETFs compared to long-term ETFs. Besides the investment possibilities in oil through ETFs, there are two other ways of investing with a portfolio in the oil market. Exchange traded notes (ETNs) can be compared to ETFs. Besides that, they are issued mostly by large banks and thus have to carry the credit risk of the counterparty (which should not be underestimated as the latest history with AIG shows). The main advantage of ETNs is that they have lower handling costs compared to funds. The second possibility of investing is through exchange-traded commodities (ETC), that are a variation of the ETFs.
50
Two parties in a long-term contract are usually negotiating the delivery of crude from certain wells over a time period, generally 6 months or longer. The price agreement in the long-term contract is typically linking the price over formula pricing to a market spot price benchmark. The formula pricing can be written as: Px = Pr + D(Q+L)60 Where Px is the price for the crude traded, with Pr as the reference price benchmark added with the difference D containing the quality of the crude Q and the location L. The reference price in a long-term agreement is typically set at delivery, to a benchmark like WTI or ASCI, whereas the difference is agreed upon when the deal is agreed upon. The difference is usually assessed by price reporting agencies (PRAs), like Platts and Argus. The price level, Pr, of main crude benchmarks like WTI or Brent, is set over the future market. The OTC market sets the price differentials based on quality and location. These differentials are then interpreted by the PRA and published in their physical benchmark. The physical benchmark and the paper market are linked together and adjust each other.
The center of the formula pricing method is the benchmark Pr. Producing oil countries are using different benchmarks for different export destinations. For example, Saudi Aramco sells their crude based on the two Arabian Gulf benchmarks: Oman and Dubai crude. These indices are published by Platt's and are the base of most Asian crude trades. Whereas if Saudi Aramco sells crude to Europe, it uses the Brent benchmark for the reference price and to the US the ASCI published by Argus.61 The chosen benchmark has a main impact on the revenue obtained from the oil producer. Given the large variety of crudes, the crude receives a differential, either a discount or premium depending on its physical components of the crude (Q) compared to the underlying crude benchmark characteristics. These differentials are periodically adjusted in order to meet the actual needs for a specific type of crude.
An Anatomy of the Crude Pricing System, Bassam Fattouh, The Oxford Institute for Energy Studies, 01-2011 (Page 21)
60
Saudi Aramco Raises Oil Premium For April Sales To Asia, U.S.; Cuts Europe, Stephen Voss and Mark Shenk, Bloomberg, 03-04-2012
61
51
A barrel of crude makes a variety of different products (see the diagram of finished products in the history). However, the refined products from one barrel vary depending on the crude characteristics. The demand for a refined product changes over time and so does the demand for a specific type of crude. The Gross Product Worth (GPW) is the spot price of a refined product times the percentage share of one refined product out of a specific crude. The spot prices for the refined products change as to the underlying demand changes. For example, the gasoline prices are typically highest during the driving season in summer, whereas no. 2 fuel oil and propane used for heating are highest during the winter period. Refineries are focusing their production on the products with the highest yield, thus the demand for specific types of crude are affected by the GPW. For example, by analyzing the gasoline seasonal price changes of the past, it seems that steep declines after the consumption peaks of summer are smoothing out. This shows that markets are getting more efficient, where consumers are buying anti-cyclical and building inventories.62 Since the price of a crude is very dependent on the location of the crude (L), freighting costs have to be considered in the formula pricing difference. This variable is determined after the "equivalence to the buyer" principle, where crudes can be compared at a certain destination. 63 The location where crudes can be compared is the destination harbor or storage facility of the crude before it goes to the refinery. These differentials are not the delivery costs that occur if the crude is transported from the field to the refinery, instead these are hypothetical costs that
Crude Oil Price Forecasting: A Statistical Approach, Armando Lara, Michael Leger, John Auers, National Petrochemical & Refiners Association, 03-18-2012 (Page 4)
62
An Anatomy of the Crude Pricing System, Bassam Fattouh, The Oxford Institute for Energy Studies, 01-2011 (Page 23)
63
52
would occur if the crude were to be transported from the field to the benchmark location, for example to Cushing. Transportation costs can play a significant role, especially in the case of gas. The casing head gas out of a wellhead is running through a separator that is differing between water, crude, and methane. Crude and water can be stored in a steel or fiberglass tank and are then fetched by trucks. Methane has to be directly injected into the pipeline system. The costs for connecting a well to the pipeline system can be so high that the gas cannot be economically used, and it is therefore released in to the air.
CASE
STUDY
Crude
oil
markets
are
characterized
by
high
price
volatility,
while
the
produced
volumes
are
relatively
steady.
It
is
important
for
oil
producers,
as
they
are
directly
impacted
by
price
fluctuations,
to
hedge
the
oil
price
risks
in
order
to
receive
the
following:
Steady
and
predictable
income
Absorb
price
declines
Higher
credit
reliability
to
lower
borrowing
rate
Financial intermediaries providing oil-collateralized loans require oil producers to hedge a minimum percentage of their future production in order to minimize the impact of oil price volatility on the oil producers ability to repay. In addition, some of the hedging strategies can reduce the need for financial capital as producers can sell their crude in advance and increase thereby the amount of leverage in the company, resulting in lower overall capital costs. 64
Energy Derivatives and the transformation of the U.S. Corporate Energy Sector" in the Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Volume 13, Number 4, Winter 2001 pp 55-75
64
53
Source:
Crude
Oil
&
Natural
Gas
Hedging
Study
from
Mercatus
Energy
Advisors
Mercatus Energy Advisors released a study about the hedging strategies of independent exploration and producing companies in 2009. Their findings were that hedging crude oil is common among E&P companies. 41% of the participants of the study claimed to hedge their crude oil and natural gas production. Of these, 80% hedged over 51% of their entire production. There are five ways of hedging the oil price volatility risks for an independent oil company like Corda Corporation: OTC o Swaps (fix against floating) o Fixed Price Forward Contracts Exchange traded o Futures o Options Puts Mixture of Puts and Calls (Collars)
RISKS
OF
HEDGING
Despite
the
advantages
of
stabilizing
future
incomes
and
the
possibility
of
increasing
the
amount
of
leverage,
skepticism
about
hedging
strategies,
especially
under
exploration
and
production
companies,
remains.
The
line
between
hedging
and
speculation
is
thin,
and
speculation
is
high
risk,
as
it
is
not
the
core
business
of
an
oil
producer.
65
54
Furthermore, hedging is costly in management time and resources. Independent oil companies are trading smaller volumes compared to the majors. The advantages may not offset the costs of a specialized risk manager and gets only efficient at a certain volume. Hedging could be risky for a producer, since it is not a standard in the industry. Producers, which are hedging over futures, could not take advantage of an upside in the oil price, or if the company is hedging over options it would have to pay an option fee in order to have the ability of taking advantage of rising oil prices. Thus, in times with high oil prices, companies that are hedging would stand relatively alone, while its competitors were making huge profits. If the oil price is decreasing, the profits of unhedged producers might crunch, but at least they would not stand alone, as they would have plenty of company. 66As the crude industry counts for an important part of the US GDP, crude producers might gamble that the US government supports the industry in rough times. This happened during the time of the low oil prices in 1988 with Ronald Reagan signing the tax act "Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act" in order to support the oil industry. A hedging strategy should take these points into account and should perform in a high price and low price environment. Further, it is crucial to understand that hedging is not a source of revenue, but rather, it is a risk management tool. Also, when companies are hedging over the OTC market, there is always a counterparty risk involved. In order to minimize the counterparty risk, it is important for Corda Corporation to find the right hedging provider. The recent history with the impacts of Lehman Brothers on the OTC market shows that the counterparty risk is not to underestimate. It is complicated to estimate the counterpartys risks, as it is almost impossible to estimate the involvement of the counterparty in the OTC market. 67
AIMS
OF
HEDGING
Corda
Corporation
can
affect
the
revenue
by
lowering
the
element
or
technical
risk
of
production
in
order
to
assure
a
certain
volume.
Corda
Corporation
cannot
influence
the
second
variable
that
determines
the
returns
as
the
market
sets
the
crude
price
and
Corda
Corporation
is
a
price
taker.
OTC Derivative Contracts in Bankruptcy: The Lehman Experience, GuyLaine Charles, NYSBA NY Business Law Journal, Spring 2009
67
55
Crude Price $0 Utility for CC 0.0 Crude Price $70 Utility for CC 73.7
$10 $20
$30
$40
$50
$60
13.4 25.8 37.3 47.8 57.4 66.0 $80 $90 $100 $110 $120 $130 80.5 86.3 91.1 95.0 98.0 100.0
The
graph
above
plots
a
simplified
supposed
utility
function
of
Corda
Corporations
returns;
the
graph
is
shaped
concave.
This
suggests
that
Corda
Corporation
is
acting
risk
averse.
Rising
returns
on
high
crude
prices
have
a
lower
utility
compared
to
rising
returns
on
low
crude
prices.
For
example
the
U($0)
would
be
0,
U($130)
would
be
100,
the
U($65)
would
be
70.
U(E(W)
represents
the
utility
of
the
expected
value
of
the
uncertain
payment,:
E(U(W))
represents
the
expected
value
of
the
utility
of
a
uncertain
payment,
and
U(CE)
represents
the
Utility
of
certain
equivalent.
The
risk
premium
RP
is
the
difference
between
the
uncertain
E(U(W))
and
the
certain
U(CE).
Thus
the
utility
function
would
be
maximized
if
the
monthly
prices
would
have
a
low
volatility.
() = (( ) + ( ) + ( ) + (. . . ))
12
!"
max
!!!
56
The main aim of hedging in Corda Corporation is to reduce the standard deviation and guarantee minimum revenue in order to provide a continual cash flow. If prices are predictable and constant, Corda Corporation can focus on their core business, the exploration and development of new wells. Corda Corporation tries to drill, independent of the actual price, 4-5 wells per year. The graph above plots a repetitive bet on the crude prices, where the red line shows the standard deviation of last year and the green line shows a target standard deviation. The utility for Corda Corporation is highest if the prices are around last years mean of $92.35.
Jan-11 Feb-11 Mar-11 Apr-11 May-11 Jun-11 Jul-11 Aug-11 Sep-11 Oct-11 Nov-11
Total Revenue $28,374.8 $36,286.4 $35,881.1 $33,937.6 $31,342.4 $30,005.8 $30,046.9 $34,908.8 $26,463.2 $27,035.8 $29,679.6
Sunoco
North
Texas
Marketing
Production
Sweet
Adjustment
in
bbl
$86.19
0.35
328.07
$86.09
0.35
420.03
$99.49
0.35
359.53
$106.88
1.04
314.47
$97.65
1.04
317.52
$92.68
1.04
319.96
$93.56
1.04
317.62
$82.45
1.04
418.12
$82.07
1.04
318.45
$82.76
0.85
322.7
$93.50
0.85
313.97
57
Dec-11 $41,482.0
$95.05
0.85
432.6
The table above gives an overview of the returns of one producing well from Corda Corporation. Corda Corporation negotiated a one-year contract with Sunoco Logistics that included this well and 12 other wells. Sunoco Logistics will purchase all of their crude oil and condensate to the posted average monthly price of North Texas Sweet crude oil. Through the average pricing System of Sunoco, prices are already abraded on a monthly basis. In the agreement, Corda Corporation receives a "marketing adjustment" from January to March of $0.35, from April to September of $1.04, and from October to December of $0.85 per barrel. The marketing adjustments are set every six months. This index is posted by Sunoco and is in a correlation of 0.99 to the WTI NYMEX benchmark, it traded last year at an average discount of $3.6 per barrel. This difference, which is changing from period to period, is the basis risk. The basis risk cannot be hedged. However, through the high correlation between these two indices, the basis risk can be neglected.
Sunoco
North
Texas
Sweet
and
Adjustment
Average
Price
$92.35
Standard
DV
7.813340136
Semi
DV
5.729792693
Correlation
to
WTI
0.999343639
Source:
WTI
price
from
IEA
and
North
Texas
Sweet
from
Sunoco
pricing
The graph above plots the deviation of the WTI crude and the index of Sunoco, plus adjustment on a monthly basis. As it can be seen, the graph is highly volatile with a mean of $92.35 and a standard deviation of about 7.8. The Semi deviation with 5.7 is relatively high; this implies a greater volatility in downward movements compared to upward movements.
FUTURE STRATEGY
58
Jan-11 Feb-11 Mar-11 Apr-11 May-11 Jun-11 Jul-11 Aug-11 Sep-11 Oct-11 Nov-11 Dec-11
Total Revenue $486,259.5 $621,841.2 $614,895.6 $581,589.9 $537,115.8 $514,211.3 $514,914.0 $598,234.0 $453,500.7 $463,313.6 $508,620.1 $710,878.7
Sunoco North Texas Marketing Production Sweet Adjustment in bbl $86.19 0.35 5619.22 $86.09 0.35 7193.99 $99.49 0.35 6158.75 $106.88 1.04 5388.93 $97.65 1.04 5442.29 $92.68 1.04 5486.50 $93.56 1.04 5442.84 $82.45 1.04 7165.25 $82.07 1.04 5456.89 $82.76 0.85 5541.50 $93.50 0.85 5390.78 $95.05 0.85 7412.86
In order to determine Corda Corporations monthly return on oil, I extrapolate the returns of the well above. I assume that the monthly returns of this one well reflect the overall relative monthly return of all other wells and thus can be used for the projection monthly return distribution of 2011 with a total revenue of $9436.249. I took into account that Corda Corporations total returns in 2011 were 70% from crude revenues. 68 In a perfect hedge, Corda Corporation would completely eliminate their crude price volatility by purchasing an equal and opposite position of their crude production through derivative. At the beginning of 2011 Corda Corporation does not know their exact production volume for the following months, thus Corda Corporation has to rely on the calculated historical production rates. This results in an additional basis risk, as production may not match the future contract size. The average production per month in 2010 was 6150 bbl. Corda Corporation held their monthly production steady for the past five years, around 6000 to 6500 bbl per month. The next step is to determine how much possible upside is Corda Corporation willing to pay for a lower volatility. Corda Corporation has to decide the percentage of their production volume that they want to hedge. This decision is established by the management of Corda Corporation and written down in the companys policy. At the moment, Corda Corporation is not hedging their production against volatility and has no policies for hedging. I assume that Corda Corporation wants to hedge 70% of the average production of last year, which is equivalent to 4305 barrels per month. One future contract is traded in 1.000 barrels, and so Corda Corporation is purchasing four future contracts each month, which is equivalent to 65.04% of 2010 and 66.9% of 2011 total crude production. I assume that there are no commissions for the trading house.
59
The future curve in 2011 was in contango until October 2011. The contango future curve is in favor of Corda Corporation, as future productions can be sold for higher prices. There are no storage costs for Corda Corporation, as they are selling their monthly average production. The spot price for WTI crude on January 3, 2011 was $91.59 per barrel. For example, the six month contract expiring in July 2011 could be sold for $94.45 per barrel. I examined three different time periods for locking the crude price over cross hedging Sunocos North Texas sweet crude oil with WTI futures: Case 1 - Short entire crude production at the beginning of 2011 Case 2 - Short crude in advanced of 6 months Case 3 - Short crude in advanced of 3 months
The table above shows the methodology on the evaluation of case three. Corda Corporation would enter into two different contracts: one contract with Sunoco Logistics and one contract 60
over the future market. These two contracts are working in the opposite direction. For example, Corda Corporation has sold their crude production of April 2011 on January 3, 2011 for $93.14 per barrel, while the average WTI spot price in January was $89.58 per barrel. On April 20 2011 the spot price for crude is $108.26. Corda Corporation will receive a margin call from their broker as the value of the futures depresses; this future will be offset by a long contract before expiration on April 20, 2011 (expiration day being three days before the 25th of the month), and Corda Corporation has to clear the difference of $15.12 per barrel. On the other hand, Corda Corporation receives $106.88 per barrel from Sunoco Logistic. Corda Corporation could lock in the January price level and would receive $93.14 per barrel. However, Corda Corporation had hedged 74.22% of their April 2011 production, the rest of the 1388.93 barrels are unhedged, resulting in an average price of $96.95 in April.
The results of the first two future cases have lowered the standard deviation from 7.813 (Case 0) to 3.09 respectively to 3.998. In the second case Corda Corporation could appreciate in the high future prices during June. The strategy where futures are purchased every three months could not accomplish the aim of reducing the volatility.
61
The futures purchased have a hedge ratio of -1. By purchasing 4000 contracts in 2011 Corda Corporation would have a total delta of -48000 bbl as they are only hedging a portion of their total production resulting in a total hedge ratio of -0.66. The impacts of different contract sizes for the three cases can be seen in the graph above. While the standard deviation of case one and two is sinking, the standard deviation of case three is rising with the contract size.
1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 16.7% 33.5% 50.2% 66.9% 83.7%
COLLAR
STRATEGY
In
this
hedging
strategy
Corda
Corporation
will
hedge
their
production
of
2011
over
options.
In
a
collar
strategy
Corda
Corporation
would
go
along
with
an
out
of
the
money
put
option
and
short
with
an
out
of
the
money
call
option.
The
advantage
over
a
normal
put
option
is
that
through
going
short
with
the
call
option
the
hedging
costs
can
be
reduced.
The
crude
price
could
float
free
between
the
bottom
floor
of
the
put
and
the
cap
of
the
call.
The
data
for
the
historical
option
prices
comes
from
the
trading
platform
"Thinkorswim"
from
TD
Ameritrade.
TD
Ameritrade
publishes
the
option
data
for
"Light
Sweet
Crude
Oil
",
with
the
symbol
"/CL",
for
three
months
in
advantage
and
the
price
for
the
May
option
of
the
following
year.
62
The options are American styled, and underlined and settled by Light Sweet crude futures. The expiring of the trade is three business days before the future contract. The future contracts expire three days before the 25th of each month. For example, the January 2011 "Light Sweet Crude Option" will expire on January 14, 2011, and if the option is in the money, the purchaser receives a February future contract. The February future contract will expire three business days prior to the 25th, thus on January 20, 2011. I suppose that the price can float 7.5% from average price to the floor or from the average price to the cap of the future price. Further, I want to purchase options at the beginning of each quarter for the following three months. I assume that there are no costs of commission for the trading house.
Source:
Database
Thinkorswim
The graph above shows that the standard variance can be reduced with the range of the floating prices. For example, on January 14, 2011 the underlining future price is $91.67. Corda Corporation goes long put at $85.00 and short call at $98.50 for February, March, and April. The crude price that Corda Corporation will receive is dependent on the price level of the option and the costs and gains from the collar option. The settlement of the March option is on March 18, 2011. The future price on this day is $104.02. Corda Corporation has a short call position at $98.50 and thus has to deliver the future and balance the difference of $5.52. Besides, the costs for the long put were $2.87 and the revenues from the short call were $1.93. Thus Corda Corporations received price is $97.56. 63
64
Corda Corporation would receive a total average of $92.95 (total revenue and production), and the average price per month would be $92.81 (12 months price average) with a standard deviation of 6.3125 . The standard deviation could be reduced even more if option contracts would be purchased in advance for longer periods like six or nine months or by reducing the range of the price level between the long put and the short call position. These two simple hedging strategies illustrate that hedging makes sense even for relatively low crude volumes. In both cases the standard deviation could be reduced and the average price gained.
CONCLUSION
Based
on
the
above
analysis
of
the
crude
market
and
its
pricing
system,
it
becomes
clear
that
there
will
be
no
change
in
the
crude
price
volatility.
The
market
pricing
system
has
been
in
place
for
over
25
years,
much
longer
than
any
pricing
system
before.
69This
pricing
system
has
problems
and
does
not
act
in
favor
of
the
general
public.
Theoretically,
there
are
alternative
pricing
systems.
However,
financial
and
physical
traders
are
not
interested
in
changing
the
market
system.
Thus
it
seems
more
likely
that
the
crude
price
volatility
is
rising
as
markets
are
getting
tighter
and
impacts
of
speculation
are
rising.
Another
problem
of
oil
markets
is
its
missing
transparency
resulting
in
a
high
uncertainty
in
the
market
where
the
oil
price
is
decoupled
from
physical
fundamentals.
There
is
great
transparency
in
the
price
of
future
markets,
but
the
trading
parties
are
anonymous.
The
future
exchanges
have
the
information
for
the
counterparties
involved
in
the
deal.
Furthermore,
it
would
make
the
crude
market
more
transparent
if
the
data
of
the
PRAs
were
to
be
published
for
the
general
public.
Independent
exploration
and
production
firms
like
Corda
Corporation
are
the
bereaved
of
the
rising
volatility
as
they
have
not
the
resources
and
expertise
for
financial
markets.
However,
in
order
to
have
predictable
revenues
this
industry
sector
will
have
no
other
choice
than
to
make
friends
with
hedging
strategies.
Since
the
resources
are
not
enough
for
an
in
house
risk
manager,
hedging
will
be
outsourced
to
investment
banks
like
JP
Morgan
or
Goldman
Sachs.
The
origin
for
hedging
comes
out
of
the
financial
markets;
they
create
a
vicious
circle
and
the
only
party
profiting
is
the
financial
service
industry.
An Anatomy of the Crude Pricing System, Bassam Fattouh, The Oxford Institute for Energy Studies, 01-2011 (Page 10-20)
69
65
LIST
OF
REFERENCE
Risk Management at Apache, Lisa Meulbroek, Harvard Business School, 08-27-2001 An Anatomy of the Crude Pricing System, Bassam Fattouh, The Oxford Institute for Energy Studies, 01-2011 Empirical Evidence of Some Stylized Facts in International Crude Oil Markets, Ling-Yun He, College of Economics and Management, Chinese Agricultural University,2008 Ties That Bind Oil and Dollar Snap, Christian Berthelsen, The Wall Street Journal, 03-07-2012 Interim Report on Crude Oil Interagency Task Force of Commodity Markets, Commodity Future Trading Commission, 06-2008 On the State's Choice of Oil Company: Risk Management and the Frontier of the Petroleum Industry, Peter A. Nolan and Mark C. Thurber, Program on Energy and Sustainable Development, 12-2010 The Role of Speculation in Oil Markets: What have we learned so far?, Bassam Fattouh, Lutz Kilian, Lavan Mahadeva, Oxford Institute for Energy Studies, 03-18-2012 What's the real price of oil?, Joachim Azria, Credit Suisse Fixed Income Research, 02-17-2012 Crude Oil Price Forecasting: A Statistical Approach, Armando Lara, Michael Leger, John Auers, National Petrochemical & Refiners Association, 03-18-2012 Lead-Lag Relationship between World Crude Oil Benchmarks: Evidence from WTI, Brent, Dubai and Oman; Mohammad S. AlMadi, Baosheng Zhang, China Petroleum University Beijing, 2011 Price of Oil: Manipulation? Bubble? Supply/Demand, Natural Resources, 06-06-2008 Reservoir Digs: on energy investing and private equity, JP Morgan, 03-222012 Probability Distribution of Return and Volatility in Crude Oil Market, Tung-Li Shinih, Hai-Chin Yu, MingoDao University Taiwan, 2009 Oil 101, Morgan Downey, ISBN 978-0-09820392-0-5, 2009 Understanding Oil Prices - A Guide to What Drives the Price of Oil in Today's Markets, Salvatore Carollo, ISBN 978-119-96272-4, 2012 The Quest - Energy, Security, and the Remaking of the Modern World; Daniel Yergin, ISBN 978-1-59420-283-4, 2011 The Prize: The Epic Quest for Oil, Money, & Power, Daniel Yergin, ISBN 9780671799328, 2011 Nonrenewable Resource Scarcity, Jeffrey A. Krautkraemer, Journal of Economic Literature, 12-1998 Natural Resource Economics under the Rule of Hotelling, The Canadian Journal of Economics, Vol 40, No 4., 11-2007 Hotelling Revisited: Oil Prices and Endogenous Technological Progress, Cynthia Lin, Haoying Meng, Tsz Yan Ngai, Natural Resources Research, 0301-2009 66
Oil Politics: A Modern History of Petroleum, Parra, London: IB Tauris, 2004 Canadian Enbridge to expand pipeline into Oklahoma, Tulusa World, 0328-2012 Oil Subsidies: Costly and Rising, Benedict Clemens, David Coady, John Piotrowiski, International Monetary Fund, 06-2010 Crude Oil: The Shifting of Global Supply Disruptions, Where Food comes from, 4-18-2012 On the Economics of Non-Renewable Resources, Neha Khanna , Invited contribution to Encyclopedia of Life and Social Sciences, UNESCO. Forthcoming, Department of Economics and Environmental Studies Program Binghamton 01-30-2001 Petrobras finds new offshore oil reserves, Oil and Gas Technology, 03-132012 Understanding Crude Oil Prices, Matt Nesvisky , The National Bureau of Economic Research, 06-12-2012 World Crude Oil Markets: Monetary Policy and the Recent Oil Shock ,Noureddine Krichene , IMF Working Paper, 03-2006 Oil price agency Platts too powerful, regulator told, Reuters, 04-05-2012 FACTBOX-Oil production cost estimates by country, Reuters 07-2009 Commodity Futures Pricing- Contango and Backwardation, Jim Finnegan, Chartered Financial Analyst Speculation In Crude Oil Adds $23.39 To The Price Per Barrel, Robert Lenzner, Forbes Staff 02-27-2012 Saudi Aramco Raises Oil Premium For April Sales To Asia, U.S.; Cuts Europe, Stephen Voss and Mark Shenk, Bloomberg, 03-04-2012 OTC Derivative Contracts in Bankruptcy: The Lehman Experience, GuyLaine Charles, NYSBA NY Business Law Journal, Spring 2009
67
DECLARATION
OF
AUTHENTICITY
The
work
contained
in
the
thesis
"Anatomy
of
Crude
Pricing
and
Hedging
Strategies
at
Corda
Corporation"
is
original
and
has
not
been
previously
submitted
for
examination
that
has
led
to
the
award
of
a
degree.
To
the
best
of
my
knowledge
and
belief,
this
thesis
contains
no
material
previously
published
or
written
by
another
person
except
where
due
reference
is
made.
Place,
Date
Signature
68