Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ORG
I EXPOSING FOUR DECADES OF MISLEADING THE PUBLIC
CO R DE UN
Contents
?
ST N
UC R
ION T
Page
1 2 3 4 ! st Report Report 5~7 8 ~ 10 2 nd
Cover & Contents WFSF Open Letter to Ohio State Fire Marshal Ohio SFM Interview Transcript - ABC NC5 IAFF Position and Court Cases Ionization Smoke Alarms Are DEADLY: Ionization Smoke Alarms Are DEADLY:
The World Fire Safety Foundation is a self-funded Non-Profit Organization founded in March, 2000. We do not sell anything. We do not solicit or accept donations.
February, 2013
1 of 10
15 February, 2013 Attention: Larry Flower, State Fire Marshall, Ohio USA
The World Fire Safety Foundation is a self-funded Non-Profit Organization founded in March, 2000. We do not sell anything. We do not solicit or accept donations.
(by certied & electronic mail) c.c. (by electronic mail): - Senator Bill Seitz, Ohio - Jenn Strathman, Consumer Investigative Reporter, ABC News Channel 5, Ohio - Bob Segall, Investigative Reporter, WTHR, Indiana - Jeff Rossen, Investigative Reporter, NBC, New York - Anthony Castelli Esq, Ionization Smoke Alarm Attorney, Cincinatti, Ohio - Jim Hacker Esq, Hacker Murphy, Ionization Smoke Alarm Attorney, Utica, N.Y. - Jim Fetterly Esq, Robins Kaplan Miller & Ceresi, Ionization Smoke Alarm Attorney, Minneapolis, Minnesota - Richard Taylor Esq, Taylor Martino, Ionization Smoke Alarm Attorney, Mobile, Alabama
UN
ER D
ON C
RU ST
ION T
2 of 10
CO R DE UN
ST N
UC R
ION T
Results of smoke alarm test have some experts sounding an alarm, but not Ohio Fire Marshal
Extract from ABC News Channel 5 Investigative Report, 11 February, 2013
Interview Between: Jenn Strathman, Consumer Investigative Reporter, News Channel 5, Ohio, USA Larry Flowers, State Fire Marshal, Ohio, USA
Jenn Strathman: Do you think with an ionization alarm people have enough time to escape? Larry Flowers: In most scenarios yes. There are so many factors that take place. The contents of the room. Where they are in the room. Depending on how easy it is for them to get out. So there so many conditions of the residence. There are so many conditions of the sleeping area. There are so many conditions of a human that we believe in most cases thats true. There are so many various factors that enter into. Every re is different. The contents is different that its, were just are not comfortable in saying one is better than the other. But we know for a fact that a working smoke detector gives folks the adequate amount of time to get out if its properly installed and it has the battery in it and they have two ways out. Jenn Strathman: Which smoke detectors? Larry Flowers: Our message is a working smoke detector. Theres a lot of different technologies out there. Its gonna change in the future. We believe theres some new technologies we believe it is coming that people are working on. So our message has been, because we have such a large number of fatalities in Ohio without working smoke detectors, our message continues to be have a working smoke detector. Jenn Strathman: As part of this campaign will you be educating people on the two different types. Larry Flowers: Absolutely we will let people know that there are different technologies available and tomorrow there may be something that will come out thats even newer and maybe even effective in a different way. But you know every re is different, the contents of every room is different. To say one or the other is better, we cant say that, and because of the numbers we are having in Ohio, because the fatalities that we are having in Ohio our message we have to maintain the message to have working smoke detectors and as important, two ways to get out.
Larry Flowers
State Fire Marshal, Ohio, USA
Jenn Strathman
Consumer Investigative Reporter ABC News Channel 5, Ohio, USA
3 of 10
UN
ER D
ON C
RU ST
ION T
IAFF and other quotes and information about NEOFPAs photoelectric education campaign to go here
4 of 10
First Report, Summer 2011 - Reprinted from Australias The Volunteer Fire Fighter magazine - 1 of 3
The Ionization type are in almost every home. The Photoelectric type are in almost every commercial building.
I o n i z at i o n S m o ke A l a r m s a r e D E A D LY
www.theWFSF.org/afac
The public have been misled into believing that ionization smoke alarms are safe.
David Isaac, Standards Australia Committee FP002 Member, NSW, Australia, August, 2006
See the film, Ionization Smoke Alarms are DEADLY:
www.theWFSF.org
the volunteer fire fighter Summer 2011! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! page 35
5 of 10
First Report, Summer 2011 - Reprinted from Australias The Volunteer Fire Fighter magazine - 2 of 3
I think the ionization alarm is responsible for as many as 10,000 deaths since 1990.
Chief Jay Fleming, Boston Fire Department Massachusetts, USA, December, 2007
Deadly Smoke Detectors TV series:
www.theWFSF.org/cbs
Darren Curtis, Senior Reporter Channel 9 News QLD, Australia, May, 2011
Australias Flawed Smoke Alarm Standard:
www.theWFSF.org/sa
See: 1. Channel 9, video: www.thewfsf.org/tourstory2 2. CSIRO Certicate of Conformity document on page 8
www.theWFSF.org/fpaa
. . . its about recall: its about banning the ionization technology and only having the photoelectric technology.
Chief Marc McGinn, Albany Fire Department, CA, USA Today Tonight, Australia, June, 2011
Today Tonight story:
www.theWFSF.org/tourstory2
page 36! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! the volunteer fire fighter Summer 2011
6 of 10
First Report, Summer 2011 - Reprinted from Australias The Volunteer Fire Fighter magazine - 3 of 3
For early warning and less nuisance alarms replace your smoke alarm with a photoelectric type.
Queensland Fire & Rescue Service (QFRS) brochure sent to every Queensland home, October, 2011
QFRS Photoelectric Campaign:
www.theWFSF.org/qfrspromo
www.theWFSF.org/legislation_au_nt
I o n i z at i o n Alar ms are
S m o ke D E A D LY
VFFA TV Campaign:
www.NFPTV.com/vffa
the volunteer fire fighter Summer 2011! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! page 37
7 of 10
Second Report, Winter 2012 - Reprinted from Australias The Volunteer Fire Fighter magazine - 1 of 3
Kimberley and her four children died in 'The Fire That Changed Everything'
After the re was out, Captain Russell Ashe dutifully tested the three ionization alarms - chillingly they all activated. So why had they all failed despite the thick, toxic smoke? This report gives a brief overview of the story behind the 40 year ionization smoke alarm fraud . . .
Photoelectrics Introduced
c. 1960 - USA
Photoelectric smoke alarms were protecting some U.S. homes and businesses.
Ionization alarms were given the 'seal of approval' by Underwriters Laboratories (UL) after tests conducted inside ULs laboratories. Manufacturers claimed the new alarms would activate before there was any heat or smoke. Fire ghters across America were recruited to promote them.
Russell Ashe (4th from right) at the signing of USAs first photoelectric-only legislation Page 32 !
More information about the rst Ionization Smoke Alarms are DEADLY Australasian
Tour (May, 2011), the December 2011 report, this report and the lm, all by the same name, is available (with Internet links) at: www.theWFSF.org/vffa
Second Report, Winter 2012 - Reprinted from Australias The Volunteer Fire Fighter magazine - 2 of 3
After thousands of people had been killed or injured in homes tted with the new ionization devices, calls were made for Government testing. The National Institute of Standard and Technologies, 'Indiana Dunes Tests' report revealed ionization alarms had only been tested in a laboratory - not in a real-world setting inside a house. T h e ' D u n e s Te s t s ' w e r e conducted in abandoned homes on the Indiana Dunes Wildlife Reserve. The average activation time for the ionization alarms in the smouldering stage of the res was over one hour. Many ionization alarms failed to operate at all.
David Isaac, an electrical contractor, engineer and member of the NSW Bush Fire Brigade (now the NSW Rural Fire Service), installed two ionization smoke alarms in his home. However, when his home lled with thick smoke from a smouldering re the alarms never sounded. He did not understand why.
The public have been misled into believing that ionization smoke alarms are safe.
David Isaac, Standards Australia C o m m i t t e e F P 0 0 2 f ro m t h e f i l m , Ionization Smoke Alarms are DEADLY, NSW, Australia - August 2006 (more about Mr Isaac on next page).
I think the ionization alarm is responsible for as many as 10,000 deaths since 1990.
Chief Jay Fleming, Boston Fire Department, MA, USA - Dec, 2007
Fire Protection Engineer and chairman of the world's rst residential re detection standard, Richard Patton, distributed 3,000 'Smoke Detector Fraud Reports' to US Engineers and Fire Chiefs.
Underwriters Laboratories (UL) is, so to speak, in bed with the smoke alarm manufactures.
Richard Taylor, Senior Partner, Taylor Martino Attorneys, Mobile AL, USA from the report, The Defect in Smoke Alarms - August, 2009
Its about recall: its about banning the ionization technology and only having the photoelectric technology.
Chief Marc McGinn, California, USA, Australasian DEADLY Smoke Alarm Tour I, national Australian TV - June, 2011
After years of controversy, the International Association of Fire Chiefs (IAFC) published their 'Residential Smoke Alarm Report' urging re chiefs to only recommend photoelectric alarms. They warned ionization alarms, ". . . might be so slow to operate in a smoldering fire that lives may be in danger." The IAFC also warned about combination ionization/photoelectric alarms, ...what is to be gained by adding an ionization element to a good photoelectric element? In the sub-committees opinion, nothing. the volunteer re ghter Winter 2012
Almost 10 years later, in Tamworth NSW, Davids daughter Katherine (7), received burns to 50% of her body in a horric re (not related to smoke alarms). She suffered many full thickness (3rd degree) burns and spent six months hospitalised. Over the next four and a half years, Katherine underwent fourteen reconstructive plastic surgeries. David's personal experience of the horric suffering that is often caused by re is the reason he is a passionate advocate for all homes to be tted with photoelectric smoke alarms. ! ! ! ! !
Defendant UL was negligent or wanton . . . by failing to formulate and implement safety standards for ionization smoke alarms that required ionization smoke alarms to detect slow smoldering fires in a timely manner . . .
Hosford vs BRK Brands Inc, Underwriters Laboratories Inc; et al, Taylor Martino Attorneys, Mobile, AL, USA - Dec, 2011
Page 33
9 of 10
Second Report, Winter 2012 - Reprinted from Australias The Volunteer Fire Fighter magazine - 3 of 3
Canadian TVs (CTV) awardwinning documentary reported on the landmark Mercer law suit after US$16.3M was awarded in punitive damages for, Failing to disclose the known limitations of the (ionization) detector to the consumer.
The WFSF requested numerous manufacturers to disclose the level of smoke their ionization smoke alarms activated under Australias (awed) Smoke Alarm Standard. No manufacturers responded.
After former reghter Adrian Butler and Karl Westwell saw 'Silent Alarms', they co-founded the World Fire Safety Foundation (WFSF) to warn re ghters and the public about the serious defects with ionization alarms. The Foundation developed the 'Aquarium Test' to demonstrate to Fire Brigades how ionization smoke alarms fail to activate in thick smoke during the early, smouldering stage of a re. After seeing the Aquarium Test and research material provided by the WFSF, the Australasian Fire & Emergency Services Authorities Council (AFAC) commissioned the Victoria University to produce a report on global smoke alarm research.
WFSF sends specications of full-scale testing (which were extracted verbatim from the IAFCs 1980 report), to Captain Ashe at Barre City Fire Department. Tests were aired by Vermont's number one TV station, WCAX. In Jan, 2009 Vermont enacted A m e r i c a s r s t S t a t e - w i d e, photoelectric-only legislation.
During Christmas 2011, two horric res in the USA and Australia made headlines around the world. The Golinski re in Queensland, Australia - 3 sisters and their mother died. The Badger re in Connecticut, USA - 3 sisters and two of their grandparents died. Gary Siljac, chef and neighbour of Australian celebrity chef Matt Golinski, wrote to his smoke alarm manufacturer. Gary asked them to disclose the level of smoke the ionization alarms in his Tewantin home activated under Australian Standards scientic testing. Garys request was ignored.
C.A.N. Report
Feb, 2007 - QLD, Australia
AFAC, the peak representative body of all Australasian Fire Brigade's ofcial position states,
WFSF report, 'Recommending Selling or Installing Ionization Smoke Alarms, A Criminal Act of Negligence?' is published. The C.A.N. Report warned that failure to adequately disclose the known limitations of ionization smoke alarms may be deemed a Criminal Act of Negligence.
Gary Siljac's (Matt Golinskis neighbour) Smoke Alarm Disclosure Request Ignored
Is Australias Flawed Smoke Alarm Standard the Key to Exposing the 40 Year Ionization Smoke Alarm Fraud?
When Mr David Isaac (Standards Australia Committee FP002) appeared on National TV in October 2004, he concurred with the World Fire Safety Foundations allegations about the life-threatening defects with ionization smoke alarms. The Foundation subsequently gave Mr Isaac extensive global research, dating back to the mid 1970s, substantiating the life-threatening defects with ionization smoke alarm technology. In 2008, Standards Australia published a draft to correct the existing, awed Smoke Alarm Standard. Empirical scientic evidence shows if the draft is adopted into legislation, ionization alarms would fail the revised Standard. If this were to happen, this could be a catalyst for a ban and recall of ionization technology from all homes globally. Despite repeated attempts, the correction to the Standard remains blocked . . .
David Isaac - Standards Australia Committee FP002 from the film, Ionization Smoke Alarms are DEADLY.
Mr Isaacs statements about ionization smoke alarms have not been challenged or refuted.
. . . how many more lives will be needlessly lost while the truth about ionization smoke alarms continues to remain hidden from the public and our firefighters?
Page 34 !