Professional Documents
Culture Documents
com/
1/26/2010
Assets (Current + LT) = Liabilities (Current + LT) + Stock Holders Equity (SE) Current Assets (CA)
Cash + Marketable Securities (notes etc) Inventory (Inv.) Accounts Receivables (A/R) Pre-Paid Accounts (PPA)
Working Capital =
Current Assets (CA) Current Liabilities (CA)
If CA > CL, then positive Working Capital If CA < CL, then negative working capital So what do we want?
Conventional Wisdom
Positive Working Capital is the norm. Increase in WC yields negative cash flows
1/26/2010
Average number of days of sales that can be made using only the supply of inventory on hand
Higher working capital indicates liquidity However, excessive liquidity ties up capital and lowers overall return on assets.
Copyright 2010, Process IS Inc. 1/26/2010 5
Use unconventional wisdom and business model To fund internal operations using negative working capital Cash Conversion cycle could be negative! And get rewarded for it.. How do they do that?
1/26/2010
Requires the right business model. Automakers do not get paid before they ship. In fact they have their capital tied in inventory for a long time which is why they have a huge working capital. Amazon and Dell to an extent (since Dell is not just online/direct anymore as they used to be) get paid before they ship. So extending payables allows them to create a small cash conversion cycle (could be negative). The Unearned revenue, which is a liability, turns the working capital negative (credit UR and debit cash) They pay the suppliers with cash they get from customers and have some left over all the time in essence getting an interest free loan from the customers!
Copyright 2010, Process IS Inc. 1/26/2010 8
Yes, you could. However, that usually is a red flag for the credit rating agencies (i.e. funding operations with cash from investing or financing activities) Amazon does not have to worry about credit rating downgrade due to A/P increase. They are doing it to increase their working capital efficiency and not because of cash flow constraint. They did issue large amount of debt few years ago and was the reason for Amazon.bom Barron's article. Servicing that debt is not an issue anymore and they successfully used the capital raised to scale themselves and the rest as they say is history
1/26/2010
Why? For profitable growth A topic for another discussion Next: Case Scenarios with Numerical Examples
1/26/2010
10