Barry "Withholding Your Consent without Suffering Repercussions!" Withholding Your Consent without Suffering Repercussions!

The Declaration of Independence, codified in 1 Statutes at Large, making it the supreme law of the land, reads: We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed I have been thinking about the phrase stating that we are sovereigns without subjects from the S .Ct. decision Chisolm v. Georgia. I think that even if another sovereign takes and files a proper oath to become an IRS agent, or state trooper, or cop that doesn't make him a sovereign with subjects! I'm reading Thomas Jefferson: The Art of Power. He says there, If man can't be trusted to govern himself, can he be trusted to govern others? This shows how serious Jefferson was about the phrase self-governance. Barry will be talking tonight about using an expanded understanding of our sovereignty and the importance of obtaining our consent under the principles of the Declaration of Independence by government still today and recognizing where government, IRS included, is asking for your consent, usually without you knowing or recognizing it, and strategies withholding that consent without suffering severe repercussions and having the government go ballistic on you. Between now and the call, give some thought to these excerpts below from U.S. Supreme Court decisions. See if you can predict where I am going with this. I have already experienced some success using these strategies which do require some extensive knowledge of the supreme law of the land. Consider these: The constitutional rights of respondents are not to be sacrificed or yielded to the violence and disorder which have followed upon the actions of the Governor and Legislature A void act can afford any protection to the officers who execute it. All who assist in the execution of a void order are trespassers in the law. If it is not within the officer's statutory powers or, if within those powers. . . if the powers, or their exercise in the particular case, are constitutionally void. Judicial power is never exercised for the purpose of giving effect to the will of the Judge The federal courts should never be accomplices in the willful disobedience of a Constitution they are sworn to uphold. Conduct that is beyond the officer's powers is not the conduct of the sovereign. Where the officer's powers are limited by statute, his actions beyond those limitations are considered individual and not sovereign actions. The officer is not doing the business which the sovereign has empowered him to do or he is doing it in a way which the sovereign has forbidden. His actions are ultra vires his authority and therefore may be made the object of specific relief.