Professional Documents
Culture Documents
c
c
e
p
t
e
d
M
a
n
u
s
c
r
i
p
t
N
o
t
C
o
p
y
e
d
i
t
e
d
1
Strength and Abrasion Characteristics of ISF Slag
Concrete
Bhavna Tripathi
a
, Anurag Misra
b
, Sandeep Chaudhary
a
a
Department of Civil Engineering, Malaviya National Institute of Technology Jaipur, India.
b
Anand International College of Engineering, Jaipur, India.
Abstract
Use of industrial byproducts as a raw material in concrete is becoming necessary to
address sustainability of both, the concrete and the industrial growth. The present study
assessed the potential of ISFS (Imperial Smelting Furnace Slag) as sand in concrete,
considering the presence of toxic elements (lead and zinc) and their detrimental effects on the
early hydration of cement. Equivalent volume of sand was replaced by ISFS in different
percentages. Concrete specimens were prepared at different water to cement ratios.
Compressive, flexural, and pulloff strength, along with abrasion resistance, were examined.
Leaching potentials of toxic lead, zinc, and cadmium from ISFS concrete mixtures were also
analyzed to evaluate environmental viability. Results were encouraging because sign of delay
in setting was not observed. Improvement in compressive and pulloff strength; comparable
flexural strength and abrasion resistance; and, leaching of toxic elements within safe limits
assured the potential of future use of the ISFS as sand in concrete.
CE Database subject headings: Concrete, Slag, Lead, Zinc, Compressive Strength.
C until the
time of test.
Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering. Submitted December 9, 2011; accepted October 8, 2012;
posted ahead of print October 11, 2012. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000709
Copyright 2012 by the American Society of Civil Engineers
J. Mater. Civ. Eng.
D
o
w
n
l
o
a
d
e
d
f
r
o
m
a
s
c
e
l
i
b
r
a
r
y
.
o
r
g
b
y
G
l
o
b
a
l
A
c
a
d
e
m
y
O
f
T
e
c
h
n
o
l
o
g
y
o
n
0
2
/
0
7
/
1
3
.
C
o
p
y
r
i
g
h
t
A
S
C
E
.
F
o
r
p
e
r
s
o
n
a
l
u
s
e
o
n
l
y
;
a
l
l
r
i
g
h
t
s
r
e
s
e
r
v
e
d
.
A
c
c
e
p
t
e
d
M
a
n
u
s
c
r
i
p
t
N
o
t
C
o
p
y
e
d
i
t
e
d
7
Test Procedures
Morphology of Slag and Sand
The morphology of slag and sand particles was studied through SEM (Scanning Electron
Microscope) JEOL JSM 6610 LV. The fraction passing 2.36 mm and retained on 600 m
was used for the purpose of capturing images of both, sand and ISFS, in order to allow
comparison.
Density, Setting and Hardening of ISFS Concrete
Workability of fresh concrete mixtures was measured through compacting factor test as
per Indian Standards (BIS 1959). Density of fresh concrete was also measured as per BIS
(1959). As discussed above in the section Introduction, addition of heavy metal oxides and
slag containing heavy metals, increases the demouldable age of specimens. In this study,
setting and hardening of ISFS concrete was qualitatively judged in relation with the
demouldable age of cube specimens along with observations on presence of soft
corners/edges as a sign of delay in setting, in comparison with control specimens.
Compressive, Flexural, and Pulloff Strength
Concrete cubes (100 100 100 mm; tested at 7, 28, and 90 days of curing) and beams
(100 100 500 mm; tested at 7 and 28 days of curing) were cast for measuring compressive
and flexural strengths respectively. Pulloff strength, representing the tensile strength of
cover zone concrete, was measured on broken pieces of beams after conducting the 28day
flexural strength test. Iron discs (50 mm diameter) were bonded to the concrete surface by
epoxy adhesive. The force required to pulloff the disc along with the surface layer of
concrete was recorded. The pulloff strength was obtained by considering average of three
selective observations, based on proper/uniform removal of the surface layer of concrete
specimens.
u
u
u
u
Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering. Submitted December 9, 2011; accepted October 8, 2012;
posted ahead of print October 11, 2012. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000709
Copyright 2012 by the American Society of Civil Engineers
J. Mater. Civ. Eng.
D
o
w
n
l
o
a
d
e
d
f
r
o
m
a
s
c
e
l
i
b
r
a
r
y
.
o
r
g
b
y
G
l
o
b
a
l
A
c
a
d
e
m
y
O
f
T
e
c
h
n
o
l
o
g
y
o
n
0
2
/
0
7
/
1
3
.
C
o
p
y
r
i
g
h
t
A
S
C
E
.
F
o
r
p
e
r
s
o
n
a
l
u
s
e
o
n
l
y
;
a
l
l
r
i
g
h
t
s
r
e
s
e
r
v
e
d
.
A
c
c
e
p
t
e
d
M
a
n
u
s
c
r
i
p
t
N
o
t
C
o
p
y
e
d
i
t
e
d
8
Abrasion Resistance
Abrasion resistance was measured according to BIS (1980) on 28 days cured,
100u100u100 mm cubes. Concrete cubes were oven dried at 110 5
Fig. 2. Scanning electron microscope images oI (a) ISFS particle (18), (b) ISFS particle
(100), and (c) sand particle (25)
(a)
SphericaI
protuberance
Cavity
(b) (c)
Fig 2.pdf
Accepted Manuscript
Not Copyedited
Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering. Submitted December 9, 2011; accepted October 8, 2012;
posted ahead of print October 11, 2012. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000709
Copyright 2012 by the American Society of Civil Engineers
J. Mater. Civ. Eng.
D
o
w
n
l
o
a
d
e
d
f
r
o
m
a
s
c
e
l
i
b
r
a
r
y
.
o
r
g
b
y
G
l
o
b
a
l
A
c
a
d
e
m
y
O
f
T
e
c
h
n
o
l
o
g
y
o
n
0
2
/
0
7
/
1
3
.
C
o
p
y
r
i
g
h
t
A
S
C
E
.
F
o
r
p
e
r
s
o
n
a
l
u
s
e
o
n
l
y
;
a
l
l
r
i
g
h
t
s
r
e
s
e
r
v
e
d
.
Fig. 3. Compressive strength at (a) 7day, (b) 28day, and (c) 90day age
20
30
40
50
60
70
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
C
o
m
p
r
e
s
s
i
v
e
S
t
r
e
n
g
t
h
(
N
/
m
m
2
)
Percentage of ISFS
0.55 w/c 0.50 w/c
0.45 w/c 0.40 w/c
(a)
20
30
40
50
60
70
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
C
o
m
p
r
e
s
s
i
v
e
S
t
r
e
n
g
t
h
(
N
/
m
m
2
)
Percentage of ISFS
(b)
20
30
40
50
60
70
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
C
o
m
p
r
e
s
s
i
v
e
S
t
r
e
n
g
t
h
(
N
/
m
m
2
)
Percentage of ISFS
(c)
Fig. 3.pdf
A
c
c
e
p
t
e
d
M
a
n
u
s
c
r
i
p
t
N
o
t
C
o
p
y
e
d
i
t
e
d
Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering. Submitted December 9, 2011; accepted October 8, 2012;
posted ahead of print October 11, 2012. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000709
Copyright 2012 by the American Society of Civil Engineers
J. Mater. Civ. Eng.
D
o
w
n
l
o
a
d
e
d
f
r
o
m
a
s
c
e
l
i
b
r
a
r
y
.
o
r
g
b
y
G
l
o
b
a
l
A
c
a
d
e
m
y
O
f
T
e
c
h
n
o
l
o
g
y
o
n
0
2
/
0
7
/
1
3
.
C
o
p
y
r
i
g
h
t
A
S
C
E
.
F
o
r
p
e
r
s
o
n
a
l
u
s
e
o
n
l
y
;
a
l
l
r
i
g
h
t
s
r
e
s
e
r
v
e
d
.
Fig. 4. Flexural strength at (a) 7day and (b) 28day age
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
F
l
e
x
u
r
a
l
S
t
r
e
n
g
t
h
(
N
/
m
m
2
)
Percentage of ISFS
0.55 w/c 0.50 w/c
0.45 w/c 0.40 w/c
(a)
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
F
l
e
x
u
r
a
l
S
t
r
e
n
g
t
h
(
N
/
m
m
2
)
Percentage of ISFS
(b)
Fig. 4.pdf
Accepted Manuscript
Not Copyedited
Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering. Submitted December 9, 2011; accepted October 8, 2012;
posted ahead of print October 11, 2012. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000709
Copyright 2012 by the American Society of Civil Engineers
J. Mater. Civ. Eng.
D
o
w
n
l
o
a
d
e
d
f
r
o
m
a
s
c
e
l
i
b
r
a
r
y
.
o
r
g
b
y
G
l
o
b
a
l
A
c
a
d
e
m
y
O
f
T
e
c
h
n
o
l
o
g
y
o
n
0
2
/
0
7
/
1
3
.
C
o
p
y
r
i
g
h
t
A
S
C
E
.
F
o
r
p
e
r
s
o
n
a
l
u
s
e
o
n
l
y
;
a
l
l
r
i
g
h
t
s
r
e
s
e
r
v
e
d
.
Fig. 5. Pulloff strength of control and ISFS concrete
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
P
u
l
l
-
o
f
f
S
t
r
e
n
g
t
h
(
N
/
m
m
2
)
Percentage of ISFS
0.55 w/c 0.50 w/c
0.45 w/c 0.40 w/c
Fig. 5.pdf
Accepted Manuscript
Not Copyedited
Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering. Submitted December 9, 2011; accepted October 8, 2012;
posted ahead of print October 11, 2012. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000709
Copyright 2012 by the American Society of Civil Engineers
J. Mater. Civ. Eng.
D
o
w
n
l
o
a
d
e
d
f
r
o
m
a
s
c
e
l
i
b
r
a
r
y
.
o
r
g
b
y
G
l
o
b
a
l
A
c
a
d
e
m
y
O
f
T
e
c
h
n
o
l
o
g
y
o
n
0
2
/
0
7
/
1
3
.
C
o
p
y
r
i
g
h
t
A
S
C
E
.
F
o
r
p
e
r
s
o
n
a
l
u
s
e
o
n
l
y
;
a
l
l
r
i
g
h
t
s
r
e
s
e
r
v
e
d
.
Fig. 6. Depth of wear in control and ISFS concrete
1.2
1.6
2
2.4
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
D
e
p
t
h
o
f
w
e
a
r
(
m
m
)
Percentage of ISFS
0.55 w/c 0.50 w/c
0.45 w/c 0.40 w/c
Fig. 6.pdf
Accepted Manuscript
Not Copyedited
Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering. Submitted December 9, 2011; accepted October 8, 2012;
posted ahead of print October 11, 2012. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000709
Copyright 2012 by the American Society of Civil Engineers
J. Mater. Civ. Eng.
D
o
w
n
l
o
a
d
e
d
f
r
o
m
a
s
c
e
l
i
b
r
a
r
y
.
o
r
g
b
y
G
l
o
b
a
l
A
c
a
d
e
m
y
O
f
T
e
c
h
n
o
l
o
g
y
o
n
0
2
/
0
7
/
1
3
.
C
o
p
y
r
i
g
h
t
A
S
C
E
.
F
o
r
p
e
r
s
o
n
a
l
u
s
e
o
n
l
y
;
a
l
l
r
i
g
h
t
s
r
e
s
e
r
v
e
d
.
Table 1. Chemical composition of ISFS (B.K. Singh, personal communication 2010, with
permission from Hindustan Zinc Limited)
Element Weight percentage
SiO
2
18.08
Fe
2
O
3
34.28
Al
2
O
3
8.17
CaO 17.91
MgO 1.93
Na
2
O 0.68
K
2
O 0.71
Mn
2
O
3
1.33
ZnO 9.21
PbO 1.22
Sulphide Sulphur 1.41
Insoluble residue 6.28
Loss on ignition (LOI) (+)5.68
R2 Tables ASCE.docx
Accepted Manuscript
Not Copyedited
Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering. Submitted December 9, 2011; accepted October 8, 2012;
posted ahead of print October 11, 2012. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000709
Copyright 2012 by the American Society of Civil Engineers
J. Mater. Civ. Eng.
D
o
w
n
l
o
a
d
e
d
f
r
o
m
a
s
c
e
l
i
b
r
a
r
y
.
o
r
g
b
y
G
l
o
b
a
l
A
c
a
d
e
m
y
O
f
T
e
c
h
n
o
l
o
g
y
o
n
0
2
/
0
7
/
1
3
.
C
o
p
y
r
i
g
h
t
A
S
C
E
.
F
o
r
p
e
r
s
o
n
a
l
u
s
e
o
n
l
y
;
a
l
l
r
i
g
h
t
s
r
e
s
e
r
v
e
d
.
Table 2. Chemical composition of cement (D.C. Maheshwari, personal communication 2010,
with permission from UltraTech Cement Limited)
Components % mass
0.88
1.18
Insoluble residue 2.82
Magnesia 0.85
Sulphuric Anhydride 2.46
Total loss on ignition 2.74
Total chlorides 0.02
3
2 2 3 2 3
0.7
2.8 1.2 0.65
CaO SO
SO Al O Fe O
2 3 2 3
/ Al O Fe O
Accepted Manuscript
Not Copyedited
Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering. Submitted December 9, 2011; accepted October 8, 2012;
posted ahead of print October 11, 2012. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000709
Copyright 2012 by the American Society of Civil Engineers
J. Mater. Civ. Eng.
D
o
w
n
l
o
a
d
e
d
f
r
o
m
a
s
c
e
l
i
b
r
a
r
y
.
o
r
g
b
y
G
l
o
b
a
l
A
c
a
d
e
m
y
O
f
T
e
c
h
n
o
l
o
g
y
o
n
0
2
/
0
7
/
1
3
.
C
o
p
y
r
i
g
h
t
A
S
C
E
.
F
o
r
p
e
r
s
o
n
a
l
u
s
e
o
n
l
y
;
a
l
l
r
i
g
h
t
s
r
e
s
e
r
v
e
d
.
Table 3. Mixture proportions and properties of fresh concrete
SR
(%)
Materials (kg/m
3
)
CF
Density
(kg/m
3
) w/c Sand Cement Slag CA SP
0 0.55 604.5 377.8 0 1208.9 0 0.96 2335
10 0.55 544.0 377.8 83.2 1208.9 0 0.94 2390
20 0.55 483.6 377.8 166.4 1208.9 0 0.94 2326
30 0.55 423.1 377.8 249.7 1208.9 0 0.94 2398
40 0.55 362.7 377.8 332.9 1208.9 0 0.94 2452
50 0.55 302.2 377.8 416.1 1208.9 0 0.93 2428
60 0.55 241.8 377.8 499.3 1208.9 0 0.93 2476
70 0.55 181.3 377.8 582.6 1208.9 0 0.90 2582
0 0.50 604.5 377.8 0 1208.9 1.133 0.92 2351
10 0.50 544.0 377.8 83.2 1208.9 1.133 0.92 2414
20 0.50 483.6 377.8 166.4 1208.9 1.209 0.92 2406
30 0.50 423.1 377.8 249.7 1208.9 1.209 0.92 2420
40 0.50 362.7 377.8 332.9 1208.9 1.247 0.92 2425
50 0.50 302.2 377.8 416.1 1208.9 1.247 0.92 2494
60 0.50 241.8 377.8 499.3 1208.9 1.322 0.92 2428
70 0.50 181.3 377.8 582.6 1208.9 1.436 0.90 2593
0 0.45 604.5 377.8 0 1208.9 2.267 0.94 2343
10 0.45 544.0 377.8 83.2 1208.9 2.267 0.93 2452
20 0.45 483.6 377.8 166.4 1208.9 2.342 0.94 2400
30 0.45 423.1 377.8 249.7 1208.9 2.342 0.93 2445
40 0.45 362.7 377.8 332.9 1208.9 2.342 0.93 2483
50 0.45 302.2 377.8 416.1 1208.9 2.380 0.92 2501
60 0.45 241.8 377.8 499.3 1208.9 2.380 0.93 2552
70 0.45 181.3 377.8 582.6 1208.9 2.569 0.90 2603
0 0.40 604.5 377.8 0 1208.9 4.458 0.93 2340
10 0.40 544.0 377.8 83.2 1208.9 4.458 0.93 2444
20 0.40 483.6 377.8 166.4 1208.9 4.496 0.92 2459
30 0.40 423.1 377.8 249.7 1208.9 4.496 0.92 2474
40 0.40 362.7 377.8 332.9 1208.9 4.533 0.92 2481
50 0.40 302.2 377.8 416.1 1208.9 4.533 0.94 2504
60 0.40 241.8 377.8 499.3 1208.9 4.533 0.92 2559
70 0.40 181.3 377.8 582.6 1208.9 4.735 0.90 2662
SR = Sand Replacement; CA = Coarse Aggregate; SP = Superplasticizer; CF = Compacting Factor
Accepted Manuscript
Not Copyedited
Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering. Submitted December 9, 2011; accepted October 8, 2012;
posted ahead of print October 11, 2012. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000709
Copyright 2012 by the American Society of Civil Engineers
J. Mater. Civ. Eng.
D
o
w
n
l
o
a
d
e
d
f
r
o
m
a
s
c
e
l
i
b
r
a
r
y
.
o
r
g
b
y
G
l
o
b
a
l
A
c
a
d
e
m
y
O
f
T
e
c
h
n
o
l
o
g
y
o
n
0
2
/
0
7
/
1
3
.
C
o
p
y
r
i
g
h
t
A
S
C
E
.
F
o
r
p
e
r
s
o
n
a
l
u
s
e
o
n
l
y
;
a
l
l
r
i
g
h
t
s
r
e
s
e
r
v
e
d
.
Table 4. TCLP (ppm) results of raw ISFS and ISFS concrete mixtures
Toxic
elements
Raw
ISFS
Water cement ratio
0.55 0.50 0.45 0.40
Lead 25.102 2.920 3.535 2.942 3.582
Zinc 126.181 16.420 13.575 15.720 17.955
Cadmium 2.304 0.068 0.142 0.113 0.166
Accepted Manuscript
Not Copyedited
Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering. Submitted December 9, 2011; accepted October 8, 2012;
posted ahead of print October 11, 2012. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000709
Copyright 2012 by the American Society of Civil Engineers
J. Mater. Civ. Eng.
D
o
w
n
l
o
a
d
e
d
f
r
o
m
a
s
c
e
l
i
b
r
a
r
y
.
o
r
g
b
y
G
l
o
b
a
l
A
c
a
d
e
m
y
O
f
T
e
c
h
n
o
l
o
g
y
o
n
0
2
/
0
7
/
1
3
.
C
o
p
y
r
i
g
h
t
A
S
C
E
.
F
o
r
p
e
r
s
o
n
a
l
u
s
e
o
n
l
y
;
a
l
l
r
i
g
h
t
s
r
e
s
e
r
v
e
d
.