Professional Documents
Culture Documents
- a set of instructions or strategies for archaeological problem-solving - intended to clarify goals and guide procedures of a research project - emphasis on RD, an outgrowth of processual archaeology (in Culture History archaeology, RD was usually implicit -- determine chronological sequence of region or site) - RD is now critical to research-based archaeology (no funding without it), and to CRM archaeology, where issues of cost-effectiveness at stake - in research archaeology: how will you solve the problem? - in CRM: how will you solve the problem cheaply? - RD serves 3 functions: 1. delimit research goals and clarify research questions -- ie., a clear statement of the problem 2. outline basic procedures for solving the problem, often through trial formulation, pilot studies 3. minimize error through appropriate measuring, sampling etc.
- basic elements of RD: 1. statement of the research problem(s); what is the research about? 2. development of a model of the systemic context 3. deduction of testable propositions 4. statement of methods (field and lab) 5. discussion of how results will be disseminated
- problem statement orients the research; most obvious but most difficult part of RD - good problem statement should show theoretical relevence (how the case study links to a larger archaeological issue) - problem should solveable (in at least one lifetime!); bad problem: what are the effects of the environment on sociocultural change? -- too vague, too open-ended, won=t get funded - types of research problems (a partial list): 1. cross-cultural studies -- search for cultural regularities by comparing several cultures, using ethnographic and/or archaeological data - usually relational studies involving two or more variables (eg., degree of sedentism, degree of food storage) - often geared to dealing with Abig theory@ problems - inexpensive research, usually does not involve fieldwork - biggest problem: reliability of existing data drawn from many sources 2. archaeological case studies -- most common, by far; involves intensively examining one case study of a larger problem
- may be used to refute conventional wisdom about the larger problem; eg., Ahunter-gatherers do not have economic specialization@ - biggest problem: demonstating relevence of the case study 3. ethnoarchaeological study -- usually a case study aimed at linking dynamic to static - problems: is the static worth knowing about (is it an important archaeological pattern)? - does more than one dynamic produce the same static?
Developing a Model
- model operationalizes theory with repsect to particular research problem; especially relevent to archaeological case studies - attempts to describe what the cultural system looked like, how it functioned (describes the >dynamic=, but without doing ethnoarchaeology - modeling is often based on existing anthropological theory (eg., D+D, p. 69) - in archaeological case studies, modeling may also invoke ethnographic record, using a version of DHA (relational analogy) - simulation modeling (eg., linear programming) sometimes used; systemic variable states are changed through several iterations
- using deduction, moves research design from description of systemic context to archaeological patterns it produced (eg., D+D, bottom p. 69) - should also make clear operating assumptions -- conditions that underly the model; we assume their existence without further testing (eg., climatic conditions have not changed in past 5000 years@; Awomen made the pots@)
- RD should specify the kind of data appropriate to solving the research problem (ie., what will we make observations on) - how will data be measured, according to what scale? - scale possibilities include: nominal (present/absent), ordinal (data can be ranked), interval (data have the property of distance), and ratio (allows comparison of two variables, eg., length:width = 2:1) - certain research problems often Adictate@ the kind of data required - eg., Aproblems of association@ (if A (agriculture), then B storage)) usually require nominal scale data; nominal scale places data into categories (present, absent, red, blue, etc.) - Aproblems of correlation@ (increase in A (distance between sites) leads to increase or decrease in B ceramic stylistic similarity)) require ordinal or interval data
- an attempt to look for systematic patterns in the data set, once measurements have been made - two types: 1. description of pattern in the sample of actual observations -- descriptive statistics
2. description of pattern in the larger universe from which sample is drawn -- inferential statistics - descriptive statistics (mean, median, range, etc.) describe general properties of sample - inferential statistics reason from sample description (a statistic) to population description (a parameter), using principles of probability; ie., what are the chances that the sample drawn accurately reflects the population? - inferential statistics are critical to process of induction -- allow us to generalize from specific cases -- producing empirical generalizations (hypothesis formation)
- RD should discuss how data will be collected - different kinds of sampling: judgemental, systematic, random, stratified - inferential statistics require random sampling (eg., can we infer projectile point length at a site if we only recover from refuse midden?)
Dissemination of Results
- RD should specify how research results will be reported (ie., you must learn to write good) - what audiences should results be presented to?