Case 2:12-cv-00887-CBM-AJW Document 95 Filed 03/01/13 Page 1 of 8 Page ID #:1829

1 JOSEPH J. LEVIN, JR. (Pro Hac Vice) joe.levin@splcenter.org 2 CHRISTINE P. SUN (SBN 218701) 3 christine.sun@splcenter.org CAREN E. SHORT (Pro Hac Vice) 4 caren.short@splcenter.org 5 SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER 400 Washington Avenue 6 Montgomery, AL 36104 7 Telephone: (334) 956-8200 Facsimile: (334) 956-8481 8 9 (Listing of attorneys continued on next page) 10 11 12 13 14 15 TRACEY COOPER-HARRIS and 16 MAGGIE COOPER-HARRIS, 17 18 19 v. 20 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., 21 22 BIPARTISAN LEGAL ADVISORY 23 GROUP OF THE U.S. HOUSE 24 OF REPRESENTATIVES, 25 26 27 28 Intervenor-Defendant. Defendants, Plaintiffs, ) No. 2:12-cv-00887-CBM (AJWx) ) ) ) STIPULATION ) REGARDING SUMMARY ) JUDGMENT BRIEFING ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Hon. Consuelo B. Marshall ) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Western Division

Case 2:12-cv-00887-CBM-AJW Document 95 Filed 03/01/13 Page 2 of 8 Page ID #:1830

1 RANDALL R. LEE (SBN 152672) randall.lee@wilmerhale.com 2 MATTHEW BENEDETTO (SBN 252379) 3 matthew.benedetto@wilmerhale.com WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP 4 350 South Grand Avenue, Suite 2100 5 Los Angeles, CA 90071 Telephone: (213) 443-5300 6 Facsimile: (213) 443-5400 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 ADAM P. ROMERO (Pro Hac Vice) adam.romero@wilmerhale.com RUBINA ALI (Pro Hac Vice) rubina.ali@wilmerhale.com WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP 7 World Trade Center New York, NY 10007 Telephone: (212) 230-8800 Facsimile: (212) 230-8888

14 EUGENE MARDER (SBN 275762) 15 eugene.marder@wilmerhale.com WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP 16 950 Page Mill Road 17 Palo Alto, California 94304 Telephone: (650) 858-6000 18 Facsimile: (650) 858-6100 19 Counsel for Plaintiffs 20 21 STUART F. DELERY Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General 22 ANDRE BIROTTE, JR. 23 United States Attorney ARTHUR R. GOLDBERG (DC Bar No. 180661) 24 Assistant Branch Director 25 JEAN LIN (NY Bar No. 4074530) Senior Trial Counsel 26 jean.lin@usdoj.gov 27 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Civil Division Federal Programs Branch 28

Case 2:12-cv-00887-CBM-AJW Document 95 Filed 03/01/13 Page 3 of 8 Page ID #:1831

1 20 Massachusetts Ave., N.W. Washington, DC 20530 2 (202) 514-3716 3 4 5 PAUL D. CLEMENT (DC Bar 433215) pclement@bancroftpllc.com 6 H. CHRISTOPHER BARTOLOMUCCI (DC Bar 453423) 7 cbartolomucci@bancroftpllc.com NICHOLAS J. NELSON (DC Bar 1001696) 8 nnelson@bancroftpllc.com 9 MICHAEL H. MCGINLEY (DC Bar 1006943) mmcginley@bancroftpllc.com 10 BANCROFT PLLC 11 1919 M Street, N.W., Suite 470 Washington, D.C. 20036 12 202-234-0090 (telephone) 13 202-234-2806 (facsimile) 14 Of Counsel: 15 KERRY W. KIRCHER, General Counsel (DC Bar 386816) Kerry.Kircher@mail.house.gov 16 WILLIAM PITTARD, Deputy General Counsel (DC Bar 482949) 17 William.Pittard@mail.house.gov CHRISTINE DAVENPORT, Senior Assistant Counsel (NJ Bar 043682000) 18 Christine.Davenport@mail.house.gov 19 TODD B. TATELMAN, Assistant Counsel (VA Bar 66008) Todd.Tatelman@mail.house.gov 20 MARY BETH WALKER, Assistant Counsel (DC Bar 501033) 21 MaryBeth.Walker@mail.house.gov ELENI M. ROUMEL, Assistant Counsel (SC Bar 75763) 22 Eleni.Roumel@mail.house.gov 23 OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL, U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 24 219 Cannon House Office Building 25 Washington, D.C. 20515 202-225-9700 (telephone) 26 202-226-1360 (facsimile) 27 Counsel for Intervenor-Defendant 28 Counsel for Federal Defendants

Case 2:12-cv-00887-CBM-AJW Document 95 Filed 03/01/13 Page 4 of 8 Page ID #:1832

WHEREAS, on February 20, 2013, plaintiffs filed with this Court Plaintiffs

2 Notice of Motion and Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 85), Memorandum 3 of Points and Authorities in Support of Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment 4 (ECF No. 84), and Statement of Uncontroverted Facts and Conclusions of Law in 5 Support of Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 86) (collectively, 6 Plaintiffs Original Summary Judgment Filings); and 7 WHEREAS, counsel for Intervenor-Defendant has objected that (1) the

8 typeface of the footnotes in Plaintiffs Memorandum of Points and Authorities in 9 Support of Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 84) does not 10 comply with Paragraph 7(c) of this Courts Standing Order (ECF No. 6), and (2) 11 Plaintiffs Statement of Uncontroverted Facts and Conclusions of Law in Support 12 of Plaintiffs Motion (ECF No. 86) does not comply with L.R. 56.1 of the Local 13 Rules of this Court on the ground that it contains legal conclusions and argument; 14 and 15 WHEREAS, counsel for Plaintiffs (1) agree that the footnotes in the

16 Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Plaintiffs Motion for 17 Summary Judgment (ECF No. 84) are less than 12-point typeface, but (2) disagree 18 that the Statement of Uncontroverted Facts and Conclusions of Law in Support of 19 Plaintiffs Motion (ECF No. 86) does not comply with L.R. 56.1 of the Local 20 Rules of this Court; and 21 WHEREAS, counsel for Plaintiffs, in order to advance this case and avoid

22 motion practice, now wish to withdraw Plaintiffs Original Summary Judgment 23 Filings and to file new summary judgment papers; and 24 WHEREAS, Intervenor-Defendant intends to cross move for summary

25 judgment; and 26 WHEREAS, counsel for Plaintiffs and Intervenor-Defendant have agreed

27 that their statements filed pursuant to L.R. 56.1 of the Local Rules of this Court 28 1

Case 2:12-cv-00887-CBM-AJW Document 95 Filed 03/01/13 Page 5 of 8 Page ID #:1833

1 shall include only statements of fact that they contend are material and that they 2 contend are not the subject of any genuine dispute, and will omit all legal 3 arguments and purported conclusions of law; and 4 WHEREAS, counsel for all parties have agreed on a briefing schedule for

5 such motions; 6 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED,

7 by and between the undersigned, attorneys of record for all parties to the above8 captioned action as follows: 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 1. Plaintiffs withdraw Plaintiffs Original Summary Judgment Filings. 2. On or before March 4, 2013, Plaintiffs will file with the Court a new summary judgment motion and supporting papers that address Intervenor-Defendants objections. Plaintiffs will include in their new statement filed pursuant to L.R. 56.1 of the Local Rules of this Court only statements of fact that they contend are material and that they contend are not the subject of any genuine dispute. Plaintiffs will omit from their new statement filed pursuant to L.R. 56.1 of the Local Rules of this Court all legal arguments and purported conclusions of law. 3. Not later than March 18, 2013, Intervenor-Defendant will file its opposition to Plaintiffs new summary judgment motion and will file its cross-motion for summary judgment. Intervenor-Defendant will include in its statement filed pursuant to L.R. 56.1 of the Local Rules of this Court only statements of fact that it contends are material and that it contends are not the subject of any genuine dispute. IntervenorDefendant will omit from its statement filed pursuant to L.R. 56.1 of the Local Rules of this Court all legal arguments and purported conclusions of law.

Case 2:12-cv-00887-CBM-AJW Document 95 Filed 03/01/13 Page 6 of 8 Page ID #:1834

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

4. Within 21 days after Intervenor-Defendant files its opposition to Plaintiffs new summary judgment motion, Plaintiffs will file their reply. 5. Within 21 days after Intervenor-Defendant files its cross-motion for summary judgment, Plaintiffs will file their opposition and Federal Defendants will file their response to both Plaintiffs new summary judgment motion and Intervenor-Defendants cross-motion for summary judgment. 6. Within 14 days after Plaintiffs file their opposition to IntervenorDefendants cross-motion for summary judgment, Intervenor-Defendant will file its reply. 7. Within 14 days after Federal Defendants file their response to Plaintiffs new summary judgment motion and Intervenor-Defendants cross-motion for summary judgment, Plaintiffs and Intervenor-Defendant may, if they choose, file replies to Federal Defendants response. 8. Argument on Plaintiffs new motion for summary judgment and Intervenor-Defendants cross-motion for summary judgment will be set for May 6, 2013, or as soon thereafter as is convenient for the Court. 9. Counsel for all parties have conferred and agree that, in light of the numerous significant and complex issues in this case, the briefing schedule stipulated and agreed to herein represents an appropriate and efficient manner in which to brief up those issues for the Courts consideration. 10. Counsel stipulate and agree that the Court should enter the Proposed Order submitted herewith.

Respectfully submitted,

Case 2:12-cv-00887-CBM-AJW Document 95 Filed 03/01/13 Page 7 of 8 Page ID #:1835

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 March 1, 2013 22 23 24 25

SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER By: /s/ Christine P. Sun Christine P. Sun WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP By: /s/ Adam P. Romero Adam P. Romero Counsel for Plaintiffs

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE CIVIL DIVISION, FEDERAL PROGRAMS BRANCH By: /s/ Jean Lin Jean Lin, Senior Trial Counsel Counsel for Federal Defendants

BANCROFT PLLC By: /s/ H. Christopher Bartolomucci H. Christopher Bartolomucci1 Counsel for Intervenor-Defendant

Kerry W. Kircher, as ECF filer of this document, attests that concurrence in the filing of the document has been obtained from signatory H. Christopher 27 Bartolomucci. 26 28 4

Case 2:12-cv-00887-CBM-AJW Document 95 Filed 03/01/13 Page 8 of 8 Page ID #:1836

1 2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that on March 1, 2013, I electronically filed the foregoing

3 Stipulation Regarding Summary Judgment Briefing with the Clerk of Court by 4 using the CM/ECF system, which provided an electronic notice and electronic link 5 of the same to the attorneys of record through the Courts CM/ECF system. 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 /s/ Kerry W. Kircher Kerry W. Kircher