EXETER & DISTRICT BRANCH

devonpatriot@live.co.uk

The Exeter & District Branch of the British National Party held a meeting at The Twisted Oak, Ide, near Exeter on Wednesday 30th February 2013, which commenced at 19.30 hours. What follows are details of topics discussed at the meeting:

Announcements
Adrian Romilly, Cliff Jones, John Ings and John Irving recently attended Nick Griffins National Tour at a venue on the outskirts of Swindon. It was a good opportunity to meet other members in the SW region and talk with them about their local branches. Nick Griffin and Alwyn Deacon gave talks which covered the following topics: The State of the Economy. Nick spoke about the state of the economy, and the effect it will have on the Nations political system, and the consequences for the BNP. On pages 10 and 11 of this Newsletter is an edited version of the leaflet distributed at the meeting. The State of the Party. Nick gave a brief summary of the state of the party with membership gradually increasing as ex-members drift back to the BNP; and the finances now more secure then at anytime during the past two years. Local Elections. Alwyn Deacon said that in the forthcoming County Council elections it is the BNPs intention to stand as many paper candidates as possible. This will give the BNP large coverage and let people know that the BNP are still in business, regardless of what is said in the left-wing press. European Elections. Although the European elections are more that a year away. The BNP will be looking to stand candidates in all EU constituencies. The head office is currently seeking suitable candidates to stand for election in these constituencies. Postal Votes. It was pointed out that a person with a postal vote was more than 8 times more likely to vote than one having to vote at the polling station. Cliff pointed out to Nick the ease with which a fraudulent postal vote can be obtained by pointing out he has obtained a fraudulent vote in the name of Donald Teal (Duck). Cliff has sent Nick a copy of the letter sent to the Teignbridge MP, Anne Marie Morris, that explain how postal votes are used by Moslems to gain power in local elections. Lapsed Members. It was asked what the criteria for the re-instatement of members who had left the party to join other Nationalist groups? Nick indicated that in an overwhelming majority of cases there would be

Newsletter, February 2013

NEWSLETTER: FEBRUARY 2013

no problem in them rejoining the BNP. However, those members who left with malicious intent will not be eligible to renew their BNP membership. Cliff said that he had recently received a reply to a Freedom of Information (FofI) request that he had sent to Devon County Council concerning hate crime within Devon. The information extracted from the FofI request can be viewed on pages 20 to 21 of this Newsletter. John Coles had brought a colleague to the meeting, Sam Wakefield, who offered to give an update on the current position concerning Johns dealings with the Sanctuary Care organization. Sam said that she had been threatened with a court order, with her assets being seized if she persists in helping John whether this was legally enforceable was open to debate. Sam had been making some investigations into the Sanctuary Care Group and found that it is a so-called charitable company which is involved in a variety of activities, including; property development, healthcare, and providing homes for immigrants and asylum seekers. The Sanctuary Group has a lot of very wealthy people associated with it, who certainly dont work for charity its whole operation appears fraudulent and needs to be investigated! Robin Bridge-Taylor pointed out that he had recently read an article that stated that out of every 1000 immigrants that come into the country from Africa or Pakistan at least 500 are infected with TB (a disease that had been eradicated from the UK in the 1960s), and from this total more than 5% need urgent hospital treatment. These infected immigrants come into contact with other UK residents and infect them, so putting an additional burden on the NHS resources. It was, also, pointed out that 30% of immigrants are infected with gonorrhea, which is putting further strain on the HNS to the detriment of the indigenous population.

2 Future Campaigns
This coming May the Devon County Council elections will take place; it is our intention to field as many paper candidates as possible to broadcast the message that the BNP are still around and mean business. A potential candidate does not have to stand in the council Ward in which he lives, but can stand in any division throughout the county. No deposit is required to stand for election as a county councillor, so no financial outlay is required by the candidate. If anybody is willing to stand as a paper candidate, then could you let us know as soon as possible so that the necessary arrangements can be made. The focus of our Devon County Council election campaign will be on Chris Stone, as being a well known character within Exeter his prospects for getting elected are promising.
2

NEWSLETTER: FEBRUARY 2013

Below are the areas covered by both the Priory and St. Leonard wards.

Chriss election leaflet, as shown below, has been sent to BNP head office for his approval:

The time-table for the 2013 Devon County Council elections are: o o 26th March: collection of candidates application documents. Noon 5th April: cut-off time for receipt of candidates completed application documents. 5:00pm 17th April: cut-off time for receipt of postal votes. 2nd May: day of poll.

o o

NEWSLETTER: FEBRUARY 2013

3 Group Discussion: The Safer Devon Partnership Does it promote institutional Anti-white racism?
Cliff opened the group discussion by explaining the he had been given a booklet entitled The Safer Devon Partnership. Inspection of the booklet revealed that it was an organization set up by Devon County Council solely for the benefit of ethnic minorities and other so-called disadvantaged groups. A small sample of typical organization listed in the booklet includes:
Amber Initiatives Anatolian Cultural Association Polso- Angielska Organizacja Black South West Network CISCO Devon (Crediton International Social and Cultural Organisation) Cultural Champions Devon and Cornwall Refugee Support (DCRS) Devon United Women Equality South West (ESW) Exeter Citizens Advice Bureau Migrant Worker Advice Project Exeter Hindu Temple Cultural & Community Centre Fata He Global Centre Hikmat Imagine Islamic Centre of the South West MOSAIC . Multilingua Devon The Olive Tree Association One World Clubs Planet Rainbow Plymouth and Devon Racial Equality Council Refugee Action Plymouth Refugees First Refugee Housing Support Service - START and PATH Refugee Support Group Devon Rejuve-Nation The Rural Racism Project Sahara BME Mentoring Programme

Cliff then posed the question: Is this list of organizations truly representative of the Devon people?
The overwhelming response from the members was that it in no way represents Devon folk. In fact it was felt that it promotes ethnic minority culture and interests to the detriment of indigenous values. Furthermore, it was felt that these organizations did not promote integration, but merely encouraged immigrants to retain their own culture and values with the indigenous population expected to modify their culture and behaviour to suit the immigrant communities.

Cliff then stated: If the indigenous population are not represented; then could the Safer Devon Partnership be deemed a racist organization?
It was pointed out that apart from gypsies and single mothers there were no other organizations within the Safer Devon Partnership that represented the values, culture, interests and aspirations of the indigenous Anglo-Celtic peoples.
4

NEWSLETTER: FEBRUARY 2013

The consensus was that the Safer Devon Partnership was indeed a racist organization and that someone should report them to the appropriate regulating authority. However, it was felt that no appropriate action would be taken but it may be worth a try, just to see what the response would be.

Cliff then went on to say that all of these organisations are either: directly funded by the tax-payer, be it by the Central Government, County Council or District Council; indirectly tax-payer funded by County Council or District Council by the free use of tax-payer funded facilities and resources; quasi-government funded by mean of the National Lottery or charitable status.

This begged the question: Should these organizations be receiving tax-payer funding?
The general feeling was that too much of tax-payers money was squandered on programmes that benefit immigrants who make little or no contribution to society; yet the indigenous population were expected to pay for these programmes even though they didnt benefit from them.

Cliff went on to say that in addition to the funding received by the various organizations, there was the additional cost to the various local authorities and the police providing these services specifically for the BME (Black Minority Ethnic) community. It is known that Teignbridge District Council has three employees dedicated to the BME community even though they currently number less that 2% of the population within the councils area of responsibility. It is safe to assume that throughout Devon more that 100 people are employed solely to cater for the needs of the BME community. Clearly, the next question had to be: Should local tax-payers be paying for these employees, and can they be dispensed with?
The general response from the members was that all employees associated with these activities should be immediately dismissed, and the Safer Devon Partnership and all associated groups should be disbanded. Why should immigrants get special tax-payer funded treatment when indigenous folk are expected to pay for any specialist service. Immigrants should be treated just like the rest of us.

Cliff then asked the question: Does Safer Devon Partnership achieve anything useful?
It was felt that the Safer Devon Partnership had a negative effect on society as it encouraged immigrants to retain their own cultural identity, and to play the race-card if they had any grievance.

NEWSLETTER: FEBRUARY 2013

Cliff terminated the discussion by asking the final question: Who gains from the Safer Devon Partnership?
Apart from the immigrants themselves, it was pointed out that in the Safer Devon Partnership booklet three companies of solicitors are mentioned that specialize in: Immigration Accreditation Scheme; Asylum Accreditation Scheme; Nationality & Citizenship; Appealing Removal and Deportation; Human Rights; Legal Aid. So clearly the real winners are the immigrants, lawyers and associated employees.

Conclusion
After a lively and enjoyable discussion the meeting finished at 9:25pm. A collection raised 63:05 which will be used to off-set the debt incurred by the purchase of inks for the Xerox printer. The next meeting is scheduled for Wednesday 27th March, details will be sent to members when the date has been confirmed.

NEWSLETTER: FEBRUARY 2013

Adrian Romillys Letters to the Plymouth Herald

Keep prosperous city just the way it is Your correspondent Mr H Luscombe (WMN Jan 5) writes that "Exeter is booming because we accept change and welcome immigrants". May one ask how he knows that Exonians welcome, immigrants? I'm willing to believe some do, or think it prudent not to say otherwise - especially among Exeter's political class but is he willing to acknowledge, that many don't? He further suggests that Exonians will watch the decline of their City if they hinder the influx of immigrants, to which I say better accept decline than see Exeter go the way of London, Birmingham and other English cities. During the 40 odd years that I have visited the city it has always struck me as a prosperous and very agreeable place; don't, in anticipation of a promised economic advantage (uncertain) allow Exeter to be transformed from an oasis of Englishness into "a vibrant multi-cultural city" (of which many of us think we have already far too many) in which native Exonians will feel themselves outnumbered, uncomfortable and marginalised. They owe it to their children to act as stewards, not owners of their fair City.

Dear Sir, I write to register my opposition to the proposed redefinition of marriage and to point out that, although Christian Churches will not be obliged to conduct same sex 'marriages' there will be no safeguards for the many faithful Christians whose terms of employment will require them, on pain of dismissal, to accept the new definition - some teachers, social workers, doctors, registrars, lawyers, and members of our armed services, among others, fall into this category. Christians of the main denominations will, as matter of religious conscience, regard the recognition of same sex marriages as wrong and they will find that, thanks to the proposed legislation, they will be confronted with Hobson's choice: heed their conscience and in consequence lose their job, and perhaps earn a criminal conviction or, ignore their conscience, and keep their job. What is presented to the public as simply another "inclusive measure" (don't we have too many already) in fact excludes many Christians and others who find the new definition unacceptable. Is this fair? Is this what the people of this country really want? The more conscientious the Christian the less pliant he is likely to be and, in consequence, the more likely to be dismissed. Is this what the colleagues of these Christians really want to bring about? If they don't they'd better speak out soon. Clearly, a consequence of the redefinition will be that many people of integrity will be lost to the caring professions - in much the same way as the well-respected Catholic adoption agencies were lost - to the detriment of the children who would have benefited from them. Still, for the politicians, it was the "Equality Agenda" that really mattered, not the kids! Only an arrogant and wilful political class would dare treat decent people in this way. Since, as with so many policies harmful to Britain, the leaders of all three parties are agreed on the redefinition of marriage it will not help dissatisfied voters to switch from one mainstream party to another at the next election. Fortunately however, there are now other parties that do not subscribe to these common policies. Why not give one of them a try the next time?

NEWSLETTER: FEBRUARY 2013

Sir, Surely the Prime Minister's response to the news (last week's Sunday Times p4) that his rival, Mr Afriye is taking advice from Mr Phillips, the equalities expert, on wooing the black vote, should be to woo the white vote? Despite changing demographics there are still quite a lot of us white folk about. If asked, I suspect the historian David Starkey would be willing to offer the PM some constructive advice on how we might be wooed. Rather than being taken for granted, many of us in the white community would be agreeably surprised, even flattered, to be wooed by a senior politician from any of the mainstream parties. The fact we aren't causes many of us to look elsewhere for a more sympathetic consideration of our wishes,

Received the Following Article from Stephen Hopper

A German's View on Islam - worth reading. This is by far the best explanation of the Muslim terrorist situation I have ever read. His references to past history are accurate and clear. Not long, easy to understand, and well worth the read. The author of this email is Dr. Emanuel Tanya, a well-known and well-respected psychiatrist. A man, whose family was German aristocracy prior to World War II and owned a number of large industries and estates. When asked how many German people were true Nazis, the answer he gave can guide our attitude toward fanaticism. 'Very few people were true Nazis,' he said, 'but many enjoyed the return of German pride, and many more were too busy to care. I was one of those who just thought the Nazis were a bunch of fools. So, the majority just sat back and let it all happen. Then, before we knew it, they owned us, and we had lost control, and the end of the world had come. My family lost everything. I ended up in a concentration camp and the Allies destroyed my factories.' We are told again and again by 'experts' and 'talking heads' that Islam is the religion of peace and that the vast majority of Muslims just want to live in peace. Although this unqualified assertion may be true, it is entirely irrelevant. It is meaningless fluff, meant to make us feel better, and meant to somehow diminish the spectre of fanatics rampaging across the globe in the name of Islam. The fact is that the fanatics rule Islam at this moment in history. It is the fanatics who march. It is the fanatics who wage any one of 50 shooting wars worldwide. It is the fanatics who systematically slaughter Christian or tribal groups throughout Africa and are gradually taking over the entire continent in an Islamic wave. It is the fanatics who bomb, behead, murder, or honour-kill. It is the fanatics who take over mosque after mosque. It is the fanatics who zealously spread the stoning and hanging of rape victims and homosexuals. It is the fanatics who teach their young to kill and to become suicide bombers. The hard, quantifiable fact is that the peaceful majority, the 'silent majority,' is cowed and extraneous. Communist Russia was comprised of Russians who just wanted to live in peace, yet the Russian Communists were responsible for the murder of about 20 million people. The peaceful majority were irrelevant. China's huge population was peaceful as well, but Chinese Communists managed to kill a staggering 70 million people. The average Japanese individual prior to World War II was not a warmongering sadist. Yet, Japan murdered and slaughtered its way across South East Asia in an orgy of killing that included the systematic murder of 12 million Chinese civilians; most killed by sword, shovel, and bayonet. And who can forget Rwanda, which collapsed into butchery. Could it not be said that the majority of Rwandans were 'peace loving'? History lessons are often incredibly simple and blunt, yet for all our powers of reason, we often miss the most basic and uncomplicated of points: Peace-loving Muslims have been made irrelevant by their silence.
8

NEWSLETTER: FEBRUARY 2013

Peace-loving Muslims will become our enemy if they don't speak up, because like my friend from Germany, they will awaken one day and find that the fanatics own them, and the end of their world will have begun.. Peace-loving Germans, Japanese, Chinese, Russians, Rwandans, Serbs, Afghans, Iraqis, Palestinians, Somalis, Nigerians, Algerians, and many others have died because the peaceful majority did not speak up until it was too late. As for us who watch it all unfold, we must pay attention to the only group that counts--the fanatics who threaten our way of life. Lastly, anyone who doubts that the issue is serious and just deletes this email without sending it on, is contributing to the passiveness that allows the problems to expand. So, extend yourself a bit and send this on and on and on! Let us hope that thousands, world-wide, read this and think about it, and send it on - before it's too late. Now Islamic prayers have been introduced into Toronto and other public schools in Ontario, and, yes, in Ottawa too while the Lord's Prayer was removed (due to being so offensive?). The Islamic way may be peaceful for the time being in our country until the fanatics move in.

And we are silent.......

NEWSLETTER: FEBRUARY 2013

The End of Britain?

Below is a leaflet that was circulated during the meeting with Nick Griffin held a Swindon on Sunday 10th February 2013. It is interesting reading.

WILL BRITAIN GO BUST IN 2013? Money Week is now the UK's best-selling financial magazine, and serves tens of thousands of subscribers in more than 60 countries.
We cite our success and experience with the crises of the past because there is an even bigger crisis looming - something that we believe will destabilise the very foundations of Britain. For the size of our economy, Britain is now one of the most heavily indebted countries in the Western world. That's official. Our total debts stand at more than FIVE TIMES what our entire economy is worth. Proportionally, that's more debt than ltaly. . . Portugal. . . Spain. . . and almost twice as much debt as Greece. Those are four countries already in the throes of financial crisis. We're the odd one out because we haven't collapsed - yet. But things can't stay that way for long. In fact, our debts tower above almost every other nation's - here are the figures that show the true picture.

10

NEWSLETTER: FEBRUARY 2013

Because when you add in all of Britain's "unfunded obligations" - promises the Government has made on things like public sector pensions - our debts swell to 900% of our economy. When you add everything up, we owe NINE TIMES what our entire economy is worth. In 2012, the government will spend roughly 120 billion more than it collects in taxes.

Government over-spending = B0RR0WING

It's simple maths. If interest rates moved back towards the normal 5% level, our cost of borrowing would triple. Britain would change radically.

The problem facing everyone in Britain

When these events unfold, very few people will have any idea how to respond. Most will see the assets they have worked all their life to secure begin to lose value, rapidly. The most horrible feeling will be the loss of control and the confusion. It's essential you prepare for these events. An even bigger crisis looming. Britain's huge accumulation of debt means its fate has already been sealed. We are about to pay for what we have borrowed, and in the worst possible way.

Escape is impossible
In recorded economic history, every single country with debts as big as ours - every single one - has suffered a devastating economic collapse. There are NO exceptions.
11

NEWSLETTER: FEBRUARY 2013

When is a Murder Deemed a Racially Aggravated Hate Crime?

According to reports in the media, in more than 50% of inter-racial murders the victim is non-white and the aggressor is white. In less than 50% of racial murders the victim is white and the aggressor non-white. As non-whites only make up 10% of the population it is safe to conclude that a black or other non-white immigrant is more than 9 times more likely to commit an inter-racial murder than an indigenous white person. However, if a white person kills a black or other non-white it is always recorded as a racially aggravated hate crime. Yet if a Negro or Asian murders a white it is very rarely, if ever, classed as a racially aggravated hate crime. The difference in which a Caucasian and Negro victim of murder is treated can be illustrated in the Stephen Lawrence and Charlene Downes cases, as detailed below.

Stephen Lawrence was a known drug pusher and supporter of the racist Black Power organization hence the clenched fist black supremacist salute shown in the picture. Stephen is often portrayed as a dedicated A level student and a pillar of the community,
12

Charlene Downes was an innocent vulnerable schoolgirl living with her parents in Blackpool when she was approached by a gang of Moslem men of Pakistani origin who flattered her into accepting them as her friends in reality she was being groomed for sexual exploitation.

NEWSLETTER: FEBRUARY 2013

yet this is not based on any factual evidence. It is suggested that he was studying to become an architect, but there is no evidence to support this. Clearly, this has been fabricated to enhance his reputation; when in reality he was part of the racist black gangland culture that prevails around the Eltham area of London. Stephen was murdered by a rival gang; there was NO racial motive it was purely a case of gang warfare for the control of the local area. She was repeated raped and used for prostitution by her groomers; but she felt too ashamed and afraid to tell her parents of the abuse she had subjected to. Afraid that Charlene would expose the Moslem gang for their sexual exploitation, the groomers (after group raping her) murdered her in the room above their kebab shop. To dispose of her body the gang cut her into pieces and passed her parts through an industrial meat mincing machine. Her minced body meat was then sold to the general public in the kebabs cooked on their premises.

For both of these crimes extensive police investigations were undertaken with the result that the following suspects were arrested, and subsequently committed to trail.

In 1996 Gary Dobson and David Norris (Shown above) together with Jamie Acourt, Neil Acourt and Luke Knight were committed to trial for the murder of Stephen Lawrence under a private prosecution. Charges against Jamie Acourt and David Norris were dismissed due to insufficient evidence. The evidence submitted by Duwayne Brooks is found to be inadmissible (dishonest), consequently the case collapsed with Neil Acourt, Luke Knight and Gary Dobson being formally acquitted; and under the double jeopardy rules cannot be charged for the same crime again. The defendants received no compensation for wrongful arrest.

Mohammed Reveshi and Iyad Albettikhl (shown above) were put on trail at Preston Crown Court in 2007 for the murder of Charlene Downes. The jury could not reach a decision (Almost certainly because the jury comprised of Moslems who would not convict one of their own religion), as a consequence a retrial was required. It is believed that the Crown Prosecution Service decided that due to the ethnic make-up of Lancashire, there was little likelihood of getting a jury to convict the Moslem defendants. Consequently the retrial was cancelled and the defendants formally acquitted. These two murderers have been awarded up to 250,000 compensation for wrongful arrest.

Now, one would have thought that this was the end for both of these cases. Not so; the Labour government under the arch-traitor Tony Blair saw an opportunity to increase Labours share of the ethnic vote. To do this they implemented a judicial inquiry into
13

NEWSLETTER: FEBRUARY 2013

the Stephen Lawrence case headed by a retired High Court Judge Sir William Macpherson. The Macpherson Report proved to be the most dishonest piece of politically-correct dogma ever produced. It was clearly produced at the behest of the Labour government to maliciously slur the police force with fabricated accusations of institutional racism although in the report he failed to give specific examples. The most controversial aspects of the report was for the introduction of a new offence that of a hate crime. The Macpherson Report defined a hate crime as:

Any hate incident, which constitutes a criminal offence, perceived by the victim or any other person, as being motivated by prejudice or hate.
The very fact that the word perceived is used to define a hate crime means that for the first time in British judicial history the truth and actual proof of a crime being committed is of no consequence; as an alleged victims perception of being subjected to hateful treatment takes precedence over factual evidence. The Labour government accepted the report in its entirety without questioning any of its findings, regardless of the numerous flaws high-lighted by many prominent people. The most obvious flaw was the fact that its findings only related to ethnic minorities it assumed that indigenous white Britons would never be the victims of hate crimes inflicted on them by the newly empowered immigrant communities, and that only white people committed hate crimes. The Labour governments rash acceptance of the report and its subsequent changes to the law did not eliminate institutional racism; it vastly promoted it in the form of institutional anti-white racism. The Macpherson report resulted in the birth of institutional anti-white racist organizations such as the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) whose sole purpose is to promote the interests of the ethnic minorities, and demonize the indigenous population as bigoted racist thugs. Some parts of the report that has now been embodied within our law including the requirement for organisations to implement a policy of positive discrimination and affirmative action in the recruitment and promotion of their employees. This has resulted in the over-representation of ethnic minorities in government organizations, with the standard of competence being lowered to accommodate the less qualified and less able immigrant candidates. In organizations like the BBC it is now hard to spot the white, male, hetero-sexual presenter as women and ethnic minorities overwhelmingly dominate the scene. Another change in the law as a result of this report was the repeal of the double-jeopardy law that prevented a person being tried more than once for the same offence. The politically-correct bigots of the liberal left-wing establishment used the Stephen Lawrence affair as a means of promoting their political agenda of venerating the ethnic minorities at the expense of denigrating the indigenous populations traditions, morals and culture. The media has devoted so much publicity to the Stephen Lawrence gangland killing that other genuine racist murders, such as Kriss Donald, Christopher Yates and Ben Kinsela, have never been mentioned. The liberal establishment even
14

NEWSLETTER: FEBRUARY 2013

placed a memorial plaque at the location where Stephen Lawrence was supposed to have died.

The Stephen Lawrence murder has witnessed a frenzied outpouring by the main stream media to establish their politically-correct credentials by comparing this small-time gangland drugpusher to that of a paragon of virtue, whos every deed was portrayed as an act of selfless benevolence. Such was the establishments desire to promote diversity and multi-culturalism that it allowed Stephen Lawrence to be elevated to the status of a national hero - a Saint even! To commemorate his virtual beautification a plaque has been place at the location where he was killed. The site is monitored by CCTV so that it will not be vandalized by people who are disgusted by this over-reaction to an alleged racist murder, particularly when a multitude of white victims of hate crimes are not officially acknowledged as such.

The top picture shows the Moslem takeaway, Funny Boyz, where Charlene Downes was raped, murdered, dissected, minced and sold as kebabs. It has since changed its name to Mr Beanz in an attempt to conceal its infamous past. No memorial to Charlene exists at the location, and any attempt by friends and family to hold a vigil and place a wreath at the site in her memory has been met with police harassment and accusations of inciting racial hatred.

Many people have jumped onto the Stephen Lawrence bandwagon to further their own interests. The vast amount of racial discrimination laws and human rights legislation enabled the Wicked Witch Cherie Blair to set up the Matrix Chambers specializing in the extraction of tax-payers money for the pursuit of questionable racial discrimination cases. The Human Rights industry, promoted by greedy lawyers and corrupt judges, extracts billions from the tax-payer and private companies each year and is seriously damaging Britains economic recovery as employers are bombarded with spurious racial discrimination charges. How have the parents of these two murder victims fared? Below are the details of each set of parents, and it is very apparent that they have not treated been equally.
15

NEWSLETTER: FEBRUARY 2013

The parents of Stephen Lawrence, Neville and Doreen Lawrence, have been given as much hero worship by the liberal-left establishment and politically-correct media as their murdered son.

The parents of Charlene Downes, Robert and Karen Downes, have been given no such hero worship by the liberal-left establishment, but have instead been portrayed as white trash. Karen Downes has had no support from the liberal establishment in fact quite the opposite. When the two men accused of Charlenes murder were acquitted. Karen was naturally distressed and tweeted that they should have been sentenced to death. The extremist left-wing organization Unite Against Fascism accused Karen of inciting people to murder, and orchestrated a campaign of hate towards her. The venom directed towards the Downess was hateful to the extreme, calling them benefit scum and lazy work-shy trash. Naturally, the police made no effort to apprehend these hateful liberal bigots.

The liberal establishment had always placed the Lawrences at the centre of all their actions to further their goal of institutional anti-white racism. They have always been portrayed as hard-working, with wholesome family values and the pillars of society; but the victims of white racial harassment since their arrival from Jamaica in the 1950s. The liberal establishment used the Lawrences to found an organization called the Stephen Lawrence Trust a left-wing lottery funded charity to promote black people to the exclusion of indigenous white folk. For When Karen endeavoured to hold a protest lending their names to this trust both Neville outside of the kebab shop where Charlene met and Doreen were awarded the OBE. her death, she was threatened by the police for committing a hate crime and has The Lawrences did not possess the high subsequently been banned from approaching moral family values as portrayed in the the shop and handing out literature explaining media, as they were to divorce in 1999. circumstances surrounding Charlenes murder. Doreen Lawrence has appeared often on Karen has not been invited onto the BBC to the BBC and other official boards of enquiry as the voice of black victims of racism. She state her case, nor has any charity been set in has also appeared on Desert Island Discs, memory to Charlene or other girls groomed by Moslems to satisfy their sexual perversions. thought by the politically-correct BBC as worthy of public interest.

With the repeal of the double jeopardy law, the police managed to get enough DNA evidence to re-open the trail; and with the Crown Prosecution Service managing to select a compliant jury, David Norris and Gary Dobson were put on trial for racial
16

NEWSLETTER: FEBRUARY 2013

aggravated murder. The basis for re-opening the trial was based on flimsy DNA evidence; furthermore, there was no evidence to suggest it was racially motivated. Below is a review of the DNA evidence written while the jury were out deliberating on their verdict.

The Stephen Lawrence stabbing murder case verdict was expected to be not-guilty due to unreliable DNA evidence seems certain. It soon became evident that the new case has been built on unreliable DNA evidence, as there is a very good chance that cross-contamination has occurred It has emerged that a bag containing Stephen Lawrences blood-stained jacket had been put in a bag containing a suspects clothing prior the crucial evidence being put into storage for a number of years. In addition, clothes which had been recovered from the home of one of the two men accused of killing him, individually bagged to avoid forensic cross-contamination, had been placed into the same plastic sack when the investigation ground to a virtual halt back in the 90s. Evidence was placed into storage in 1995, following the unsolved 1993 investigation. One of the most crucial bits of evidence, the black LA Raiders jacket, which Stephen Lawrence was wearing when he was attacked, may not have been handled and stored in the ideal way, and contaminated other evidence, such as the clothing from the defendants. The stabbing in Eltham, South-East London shocked the nation at the time of the offence. One of the plastic sacks had also been discovered with a missing seal, which was supposed to keep contents free from contamination. The main prosecution argument suggests that blood, hair and microscopic fibres on the clothes taken from homes of the two suspects, Gary Dobson and David Norris appear to have been put into the same bag, further complicating the situation, and seriously undermining any plausibility of DNA evidence being reliable in the case. Although DNA evidence is now very reliable if well handled; flawed, and some say primitive, police systems in the 1990s arguably may make it impossible to rule out whether forensic evidence had been inadvertently transferred between clothing items belonging to victim and suspects during the handling and storage process. Christopher Bower, who was in charge of storage of exhibits at a Metropolitan Police lab has confirmed that there was no system to separate victim and suspect items after they had been forensically examined, which appears to be a massive blow for the prosecutions case. The brown paper bags containing individual items were placed at random in clear plastic over-bags, mixing up individual clothing evidence. When being questioned by Timothy Roberts QC, who is representing Dobson, Mr Bower confirmed that no specific segregation instructions for dealing with the bags, and also nothing to prevent the contents being mingled, and no system of keeping them separate for further examination, such as the cold case review which later followed. Remarkably gloves were not always used when presenting evidence which was produced at a private prosecution brought by Stephens parents in 1996. The items had to be moved and stored again before a cold case review in 2007 and 2008, which discovered the forensic evidence now at the heart of the prosecution case. Kent Police had taken possession of key exhibits in 1997 while they were looking into complaints about the conduct of Met officers during the first murder investigation. They had been returned in 1998, which was prior to the official Lawrence Inquiry.

17

NEWSLETTER: FEBRUARY 2013

In spite of the overwhelming evidence that the DNA evidence was unreliable, which in any other trail the Judge would have declared as inadmissible, the jury returned a guilty verdict on both defendants. Clearly, this was a show trial set up by the liberal establishment to appease the ethnic minority claim that they are the victims of racial persecution by the majority indigenous British population. The vicious witch-hunt against both Gary Dobson and David Norris instigated by the Labour Government of Tony Blair, the liberal/left-wing press and the BBC meant that the jury had been subjected to biased reporting for over twenty years; so is it any wonder that with the level of negative reporting about the defendants, the jury were brain-washed into finding them guilty. Why do the racial discrimination laws only seem to apply in the case of white-on-black offences but never in cases of black-on-white crime? A short rsum of official statistics reveals the following:
Blacks are 5 times more likely to commit violence against the person. Blacks are 4 times more likely to commit sexual offences. Blacks are fifteen times more likely to commit robbery. Blacks are over six times more likely to commit fraud and forgery. Blacks are over twice as likely to commit criminal damage. Black are five times more likely to commit drugs offences.

A preliminary analysis of official crime data shows: Violence against the person is 5 times more prevalent in the black community, than in the white community. Drugs offences are 16 times more prevalent in the black community, and 3 times more prevalent in the Asian community, than in the white community. Robbery is over 9 times more prevalent in the black community, than in the white community. Committing homicide is 6 times more prevalent in the black community, and twice as prevalent in the Asian community, than it is in the white community. The homicidal killing of white people is 90 times more prevalent in the black community, than the homicidal killing of black people in the white community. The homicidal killing of white people is 30 times more prevalent in the Asian community, than the homicidal killing of Asian people in the white community. The number of white victims of inter-racial homicide is approximately 40 times greater than expected, when compared to the number of such victims in the minority (BME) community. The white community suffers more victims of inter-racial and racially motivated homicide than all of the minority (BME) communities put together despite the BME communities being less than 10 per cent of the total population. The number of white victims of racially motivated homicide is approximately 50 times greater than expected, when compared to the number of such victims in the minority (BME) community.

In spite of these statistics very few (if any) ethnic minorities are actually charged with racially aggravated crime, yet an indigenous white person would be charged accordingly for the most trivial of incidents. Why do the indigenous British people put up with this injustice, when it is clear from government statistics that they are not the main instigators of hate crime? White Britons have been brainwashed since the 1950s into believing that they are intrinsically racist and must make amends for the perceived past sins of empire. This self-flagellation has got to stop; indigenous Britons must again take pride in their forefathers past achievements and stand up against the constant institutionalized demonization that is directed against them by the liberal elite establishment.
18

NEWSLETTER: FEBRUARY 2013

To answer the question at the head of this article: When is a Murder Deemed a Racially Aggravated Hate Crime?

Only when it is committed by a white person.

19

NEWSLETTER: FEBRUARY 2013

Hate Crimes in Devon
Below is a table detailing the incidences of reported Hate crime within Devon for the year 2012, as compiled by Devon County Council in response to a FofI request. My comments are shown in red.
Ethnicity of Victim
Asian Asian

Ethnicity of Perpetrator
White British White British

Nature of Crime/Incident
Verbal Abuse Harassment

Action Taken
Referred to Police Victim requested police involvement. Met and signposted to community support. Met and advised on options. Signposted to legal advice and to option of free counselling Referred to police. Victim requested no action. Met and discussed options. Signposted to legal advice and to option of free counselling No action Requested also reported directly to police. Also reported to police. Met with community advocate and liaised with police. Met with victim. Signposted to counselling, community support group and encouraged to talk to police. Eventually agreed to meet CPSO for informal talk. Victim Requested no action. Meeting arranged, but victim failed to show. No action Requested also reported directly to police. Allegation Discussed with police. Police advice passed and mediation offered.

Comments
Why no action? Was the victim here illegally? Who paid for free counselling? The tax-payer of course. Why no action? Was the victim here illegally? Who paid for free counselling? The tax-payer of course. Since when has property damage been a hate crime?

Chinese

Unknown

Workplace Discrimination

Asian Asian Black British

White British White British Unknown

Verbal Abuse Verbal Abuse Workplace Bullying

Gypsy/Traveller

Unknown

Property Damage

Asian

White British

Harassment

White Other

White British

Verbal Abuse

White British

Unknown

Verbal Abuse/ Harassment

Gypsy/Traveller

Unknown

Property Damage

White British

Unknown

Allegation of racism against institution.

Clearly, the white victim thought it pointless pursuing the case. No action requested? Probably an insurance fraud. Sounds like the victim of institutional antwhite discrimination.

20

NEWSLETTER: FEBRUARY 2013

White Other White British Workplace Bullying Met. Contacted employment solicitor on victims behalf and advised on options. Reported to police previously, but victim not satisfied with police action. Met at victims request, liaised with police to review investigation and report back. Met. Contacted employer on victims behalf. Referred to counselling and community support group. Victim involved in ongoing police case. Liaising with police to ensure aware of developments and protection and reassurance measures in place. No action requested. Contacted school and school welfare officer at parents request. Family signposted to local community support group. Already reported to police. Signposted to community support.
Its clear that the lawyers are making a fortune out of so called hate crime.

Black British

Assault

What; no ethnicity of the perpetrator!

White Other

Unknown

Workplace Bullying

Asian

Asian

Verbal Threats

Asian is a very wide term. Do they mean Indian, Paki, or Chinese?

Asian Mixed Heritage

White British White British

Verbal Abuse Racist Bullying at School

White Other

Unknown

Harassment and Verbal Abuse

It is the police who are primarily responsible for investigating hate crime. However, Devon County Council Social Services Department are responsible for providing support from the alleged victim. In fact throughout Devon there is a vast workforce (numbering more than 100) employed by local councils, health authorities and education authorities whose sole responsibility is to monitor, investigate and attempt to resolve issues of hate and racial discord within the community. Looking at the list of so called hate crimes throughout Devon during 2013, it very short 19 in total. So clearly we dont have a problem with this type of behaviour in Devon so why are their so many people employed to service this activity? It is apparent that these are non-jobs have been created to satisfy the politically-correct diktats of our liberal-left governments of the past 20 years. Savings to our council tax bills can be implemented immediately by sacking all of these parasitical employees.
21