Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Organised by
The Pontifical Council for Interreligious Dialogue, Vatican
&
The Office on Inter-Religious Relations and Dialogue,
World Council of Churches, Geneva
*****
*****
What humankind offers to God Almighty is a bouquet,
not a bunch of flowers of the same colour;
and God accepts prayers from every pure heart, irrespective of creed.
1
myself in the sublimely beautiful Church of St. Peter, I offered my heartfelt
prayers. And I experienced the same peace and tranquility within myself as
when I used to feel when visiting the Don Bosco church in the vicinity of my
home in Bombay every week, with my little daughter Tapas holding my hand.
Father Machado hails from Vasai, a distant suburb of Bombay on the Arabian
sea and a town that emits the fragrance of peaceful co-living between Hindus
and Christians. Last year, I was invited by ‘Suvarta’ (it means ‘Good Tidings’), a
reputed church journal in Marathi (the language of the state of Maharashtra,
which is spoken by most of the Christians living in Vasai) to participate in an
interactive session with a large gathering of devour church-goers. For me it was
a highly satisfying interaction, the more so because I went there as the
representative of an Indian political party that is associated with the majority
Hindu community and is often projected as antithetical to the Muslim and
Christian minorities. I think I was able to allay at least some of the misgivings of
the audience. The wooden carving of Jesus Christ on the Cross, which was
presented to me by Father Debrito at the function, still adorns our drawing
room, placed by the side of a statue of the Starving Buddha.
*****
‘T r uth is One; the W ise Inter pr et and E xpr es s It Dif fer entl y’
2
spirituality and, at most times in our history, also in the statecraft of the
countless kings and emperors who ruled India. This is because, since time
immemorial, India has welcomed people of every faith that found their way to
her shores or traveled to her plains overland. And within India, there has been
no persecution of any people on the grounds of their faith – or any new faith that
they might have accepted voluntarily.
The cumulative effect of all these internal transformations and social, spiritual
and cultural interactions has been to produce a society of immense diversity,
but one that exhibits an equally incontrovertible underlying unity. This Unity in
Diversity has been the ever-changing but ever-same signature tune of India
since her birth in the unknown depths in time.
3
India’s interaction with the two principal non-Indic faiths – Christianity and
Islam – may have introduced some new variations to this tune, but have not
changed the tune itself fundamentally. Today Islam and Christianity are as
much an integral part of India’s social fabric as the different Indic faiths.
Historically, the introduction of Christianity and Islam to India has followed two
trajectories – political and socio-spiritual. Insofar as Islam came with the trader
and the saintly sufi, its simplicity and message of equality had an appeal to a
section of society that embraced it. But when Islam gained converts on the
coercive strength of the sword of the invader or the intolerant ruler, who often
did not hesitate to destroy Hindu temples in his iconoclastic zeal, it left a scar.
The former kind of Islam enriched India’s society and spirituality. However, the
latter kind sowed the seeds of separatism, domination and bigotry, which in
course of time led to India’s bloody partition in 1947.
Another example, this one derived from Millie Graham Polak's book Gandhi, The
Man. Henry Polak and his wife Millie Graham Polak were quite to close to
Gandhiji during his years in South Africa. Mr. Polak, then a young lawyer and
editor of a journal, "Critic," presented John Ruskin's book "Unto the Last" to
Gandhi which greatly influenced him. Ruskin's "Lead Kindly Light" was his
favorite prayer. "Is Mr. Gandhi a Christian?", a visitor once asked Millie. Ms.
Millie asked for further clarification -- whether she meant one converted to
Christianity or one who believed in the teachings of Christ. The visitor
emphatically told she meant former. She was talking about him with some
friends and they were wondering that Gandhi knew Christian scriptures so well,
and fond of quoting words of Christ frequently and hence her friends thought he
must be a Christian.
Ms. Millie brooded over. What the visitor said was true. Mr. Gandhi frequently
quoted the sayings and teachings of Jesus. The lesson of the "Sermon on the
Mount" seemed to work constantly in his mind, and was a source of guidance
and inspiration to him. There was a beautiful picture of Jesus Christ that
4
adorned the wall over his desk. (There was no picture of the Buddha or of
Krishna in the office, but in the center of his office room was the face of Christ.)
When asked why he did not embrace Christianity, Gandhi has said that he had
studied the scriptures and was tremendously attracted. But eventually he came
to the conclusion that there was nothing really special in the scriptures which
he had not got in his own, and "to be a good Hindu also meant that I would be a
good Christian. There was no need for me to join your creed to be a believer in
the beauty of the teachings of Jesus or try to follow His example," he said.
It is believed that the earliest Christian community in India took birth after St.
Thomas, one of the twelve closest disciples of Jesus, came to India – on the
western coast of Kerala -- in the first century. The community there has evolved
since then in a natural, unobstructed manner, retaining its distinctive identity
but also contributing in a proud way to the common wellbeing of the larger
society of which it has been a part. In other parts of India, too, many individuals
have embraced Christianity out of their free choice. Among the notable
personalities is Pandita Ramabai (who was the first Indian woman to study
modern medicine by going abroad).
But the growth of Christianity in India has also followed a different trajectory,
determined, firstly, by the British colonial rule and, later, by the aggressive
evangelical work of some missionary organizations. This has sometimes created
tension between Christians and non-Christians, and given rise to misgivings
about Christians in general and missionaries in particular.
5
minister in the BJP-led government, has extensively dealt with both aspects of
the trajectory. Significantly, the book was a product of Shourie’s interaction with
distinguished representatives of the Christian community when he was invited
to share his views at a conference organised by the Catholic Bishops Conference
of India in 1994 to celebrate the 50th anniversary of the CBCI. With voluminous
documentary evidence, Shourie shows that conversion of the “heathens” to
Christianity, and thus “saving their souls”, was an important objective of the
British rule in India, especially in its early period. And those who were engaged
in this activity from this standpoint were unanimous on the following points:
As the people are in such suffering, and also because Jesus in his parting
words has bound us to do so, it is our duty to deliver them to Christianity;
For this, it is “the walls of the mighty fortress of Brahminism” which are to
be “encircled, undermined and finally stormed by the soldiers of the
Cross”, so that “the victory of Christianity must be signal and complete”;
For this, the missionaries have to focus particularly on the outcastes and
tribals, since these are the ones who are most oppressed and therefore
most in need of the saving-touch of Christ; The foremost target group – the
tribals – were declared to be not Hindus, but “Animists”.
6
Brahmin…who learns geography in our colleges, learns to smile at the
Hindu mythology,” wrote Lord T.B. Macaulay, a famous British historian.
Of course, this was not the only side of the reality, as far as the relationship
between the British rule and Indian Christians was concerned. Many eminent
Christians joined the Freedom Struggle, fighting shoulder-to-shoulder with their
non-Christian brethren. Some foreigners like C.F. Andrews, upon coming in
contact with Mahatma Gandhi, became participants in India’s Freedom
Movement. Gandhiji gave him the title ‘Din Bandhu’ (‘Brother of the Poor’), and
said of him: “He preaches through his life as very few do, and he preaches the
purest love.” Another close collaborator of Gandhiji was Joseph Chelladurai
Kumarappa. Many such examples can be given of Christians’ participation in the
Indian people’s common struggle for national liberation.
“It is impossible for me to reconcile myself to the idea of conversion after the style
that goes on in India and elsewhere today. It is an error which is perhaps the
greatest impediment to the world's progress toward peace. Why should a Christian
want to convert a Hindu to Christianity? Why should he not be satisfied if the Hindu
is a good or godly man?” (Harijan: January 30, 1937)
“I hold that proselytisation under the cloak of humanitarian work is unhealthy to say
the least. It is most resented by people here. Religion after all is a deeply personal
thing. It touches the heart… Why should I change my religion because the doctor
who professes Christianity as his religion has cured me of some disease, or why
7
should the doctor expect me to change whilst I am under his influence?” (Young
India: April 23, 1931)
“As I wander about through the length and breadth of India I see many Christian
Indians almost ashamed of their birth, certainly of their ancestral religion, and of
their ancestral dress. The aping of Europeans by Anglo-Indians is bad enough, but
the aping of them by Indian converts is a violence done to their country and, shall I
say, even to their new religion.” (Young India: August 8, 1925)
“My fear is that though Christian friends nowadays do not say or admit it that Hindu
religion is untrue, they must harbour in their breast that Hinduism is an error and
that Christianity, as they believe it, is the only true religion. So far as one can
understand the present (Christian) effort, it is to uproot Hinduism from her very
foundation and replace it by another faith.” (Harijan: March 13,1937)
“If I had the power and could legislate, I should stop all proselytizing. In Hindu
households the advent of a missionary has meant the disruption of the family
coming in the wake of change of dress, manners, language, food and drink.”
(Harijan: November 5, 1935)
In the post-independence period, there has been much welcome change but also
significant continuity in the proselytization work by Christian missionaries in
India. The most important change has come about due to the reformulation of
the Catholic Church’s relation to other religions in the world, after the historic
Second Ecumenical Council of the Vatican, or Vatican II, opened under Pope
John XXIII in 1962 and closed under Pope Paul VI in 1965. For the first time, it
was acknowledged that redemption may be attained through other religions too.
Whereas earlier the “others” used to be considered “heathens” living in torment,
Vatican II recognised non-Christians as those “in whom the Spirit has also
worked wonders.”
In the aftermath of Vatican II, the Church in India has started to lay far greater
emphasis on four elements -- “contextualisation”, “localisation”,
“inculturation” and “dialogue with other religions”. The earlier exclusivity of
Christianity has been de-emphasised. Christian rituals have been considerably
de-Latinised. Bhajan and aarti, both quintessential rites associated with the
Hindu way of worship, have become common in many places. CBCI has
acknolweged way back in 1994 that “the building of a truly local Church has
become an urgent and primary task in our mission agenda. The radical
questioning of the foreignness of our identity should not be left to those who
oppose Christianity. It must begin with the missionary Church itself.”
8
Freedom of faith is of course inviolable. It is the basic human right of
everybody in every country and in every age. And freedom of propagation
is integral to freedom of faith. And so is the right to embrace another faith
voluntarily. But is there any justification for a campaign for conversion,
especially though coercion or inducement, or in the guise of humanitarian
service?
Why do proselytizers in India target mostly poor tribals, dalits and other
oppressed sections of the Hindu society? Experience has shown that
religious conversion of these people does not in any significant way change
their life-condition. On the contrary, it creates misgivings among others
about Christianity and missionaries. (In this context, let me hasten to add
that I do not in the least deny or condone certain unfortunate and
extremist Hindu reaction to the work of missionaries. At the same time,
nobody can ignore that aggressive evangelism can evoke a negative
reaction in any society.)
Why are prosletizing missionaries not active among the poor and socially
backward sections of the Muslim community in India? Can we ignore the
recent incident in Afghanistan when intense pressure from western
countries was brought to bear on President Hamid Karzai to save the life
of a Muslim Afghan national, Abdul Rehman who, when he converted to
Christianity, was sentenced to death by Muslim clerics?
After Vatican II, is there really any need or propriety for evangelization as
a part of the Church activities? Isn’t it better, in acknowledgement of the
basic validity of all religions, for each religion to focus on its own self-
improvement and leave acceptance of another faith purely to the voluntary
and well-considered judgment of the individual concerned?
9
last year. He said, "By birth I am an Indian, by culture a Hindu and by faith, I
am a Christian."
I conclude this write-up by affirming my belief that God has created diversity –
and not uniformity – as the essential principle of the architecture of this
Universe. And this is as true about the physical or material side of Nature, as
about the social and spiritual side of Man’s life. Of course, there is also God-
created unity that underpins the religious diversity visible on the surface.
Therefore, what humankind offers to God Almighty is a bouquet, and not a
bunch of flowers of the same colour. God accepts prayers from every pure heart,
irrespective of creed.
10
unites humanity, and not divide it. It promotes universal peace, brotherhood,
goodwill and mutual trust and understanding. May all of us get “converted” to
that true, uniting and ennobling religious spirit.
11