Hey everybody, I know that a lot of us found our quest into the alternative science literature in search for

an alternative energy source. It has been a long quest of sacrifice, but thanks to Eric Dollard, it has begun to pay off for me. I don't have a lot of time to explain all of the little details because those will have to be tackled according to the material that you choose to use, but here is the basic bare bones circuit that I am using and am definitely 'Synthesizing Energy'.

I am not posting my results as of yet because I have much more to test before I give a 'final presentation'. This is just a starting platform for any other engineer to work with. This worked with my first attempt at following the idea's highlighted in the diagram above. If this worked first attempt for me with COP > 1, I am sure that none of you will have much trouble expanding upon this and getting usable power out. I will answer what I feel are important questions, but will probably not spend too much typing since I have lots of work to do winding coils. Good Luck Dave P.S. I am easily seeing a net efficiency of up to 1100% without the system even being close to optimally tuned.

Quote:

Originally Posted by SilverToGold Hi Dave, If someone else posted such claims, I'd be skeptical. But coming from you Dave, I have to give it serious consideration. Where did you get the 3 leg Magamp? Are the 3 windings on the Magamp of equal length of wire? What is the output ratio on your Output transformer? 1:1? I'd be more interested in hearing the theory of how this works. You say that it is a variable inductance machine, how does the variable inductance happen here? I'll give this circuit a try and see what happens. 1100%!!! Will be very interested in seeing the posted results. Please don't delay in trying to make it all perfect. If you got it, please share so something doesn't happen to prevent replication and verification. I'm sure you know how it goes in this field. Thanks Dave and great work! I am not actually using a three legged magamp. It is two large grain-oriented eletrical steel tape wound toroids. From all of my studies into parameter variation, it should also work with a three legged magamp. The only goal with the core is to cause the power circuit to see a change in inductance. Either the three legged core or my toroid setup should work fine. Here is a picture of my hand wound toroidal magamp:

The two power windings are of equal AWG (16), length, turns (184), but of different magnetic orientation as to not see an induced EMF from the modulation winding. The control winding has 928 turns of 23 AWG and it is wound around both toroids whereas the power windings each have their own toroid. The output transformer is a 5:1 and I am running the constant current source thru the low impedance side so it is stepping up the voltage. Any transformer with a low resistance winding should work for the primary side but you MUST impedance match the load to the secondary winding of the transformer. The modulation circuit causes the constant current circuit to see a change in inductance due to the permeable core's saturation/desaturation cycles of the applied AC signal. This change in permeability causes the constant current circuit to see a variation in inductance. This variation in inductance causes an AC signal to be superimposed on to the DC constant current. The AC signal is picked off by the variation of the flux density in the output transformer which results in an EMF at the secondary terminals of the output transformer. The EMF at the secondary terminals, when properly tuned, will not be a reflection of the amount of energy used to cause the EMF. Energy seems to be synthesized in this mode of operation. Smoking resistors on the output terminals of my setup are a testament of this while observing the input energy of the modulation circuit and constant current circuit to be of far less magnitude. Read Eric's "Law of Electromagnetic Induction" series for more technical info.

ANY competent researcher can put this together and make it work. Use low resistances in the modulation and constant current circuits to cut down on losses, then impedance match the load to the output transformer. Measure the i^2R losses in the input circuits using a scope or DMM and compare those to the power dissipated in the output load. Just build it and be surprised. Thank you Eric Dollard for making all of this possible. I am truly indebted to you. If you build this and see that it works, please consider donating to Eric. Trust me when I say that he has made far less than minimum wage for his efforts to put together all of these writings.

Originally Posted by SilverToGold Thank you Dave for the reply. I believe I understand what is going on now from Eric's posts and your explanation. It's sort of like an Alexanderson variable inductance machine. I'll put something together and see what happens. Are you using a hand made constant current circuit or hooking up a DC power supply in Constant Current Mode? This is the first time I believe someone trustworthy has finally given out a simple easy to reproduce circuit that ends all the guess work. With widespread replication, this could be BIG. Thank you Dave and Eric. I hope everyone remembers Eric and helps the man out. God Bless My constant current consists of 120V 60 Hz wall socket EMF that is fed into a variable transformer that feeds a full wave bridge rectifier that charges my Constant Current Source which is a capacitor. It is important that there NOT BE ANY UNNECESSARY RESISTANCE in the constant current circuit; this is the reason for using a source capacitor instead of a low voltage, low amp hour battery which has inherent resistance. **This is all for theoretical analysis and not practical use as of yet** I just tried replacing my two smaller transformers with two microwave oven transformers that have LOWER RESISTANCE and HIGHER FLUX DENSITY CAPACITY and was able to get up to a 2600% net output and a 600% total output. Net Output = (Total Output Watts)/(Input Loss Watts - Modulation Step-Up Transformer Watts) = 2600% Total Output = (Total Output Watts)/(Total Input Watts) = 600% The reason for the modulation step-up transformer is because it inductance of the control winding is so large that applying a direct 120V 60 Hz doesn't pass enough current to saturate the core. I have a variac connected to a microwave oven transformer (MOT) that modulates the control winding with the higher voltage. The MOT secondary winding has about 120 Ohms of resistance compared to the 14 Ohms in the control winding. Naturally, since the resistance of the secondary winding of the MOT doesn't play a role in the system under study, I left it out of the 'Net Output' calculations.

Originally Posted by GSM Hi Dave. You are merely resonantly phase shifting conduction angle. Make your source a battery driven pure sine power inverter and see how much power you are really using ! Cheers ........... Graham Hey Graham, I know that over time we become ever more skeptical of such claims of 'free energy' and try to find out where the researcher has gone wrong in his measurements, but I assure you this circuit is the real deal. I don't have a pure sine wave inverter, but I do have one that puts out a 'spikey' 60Hz wave. I hooked it up to the variac that is feeding the constant current source and there was no difference in DC power being delivered from the battery while the circuit was being modulated vs. the modulation circuit being unpowered. The heat being developed in the output resistors is definitely a function of the parameter variation. Just build it and see. Dave

For those of you who don't have magamps and don't want to wind toroids, go browse this site: Homemade Magnetic Amplifiers.. I'd be willing to bet that you can achieve the same effect as me using conventional transformers hooked up like the 'Magnetic Amplifier with Reactance Coils in Series' configuration shown on that page. Dave

Originally Posted by Web000x My constant current consists of 120V 60 Hz wall socket EMF that is fed into a variable transformer that feeds a full wave bridge rectifier that charges my Constant Current Source which is a capacitor. It is important that there NOT BE ANY UNNECESSARY RESISTANCE in the constant current circuit; this is the reason for using a source capacitor instead of a low voltage, low amp hour battery which has inherent resistance. **This is all for theoretical analysis and not practical use as of yet** Kind of like this (being used to charge some batteries for a shopping go-cart), with large electrolytic caps in parallel to the bridge rectifier?

Originally Posted by SilverToGold Kind of like this (being used to charge some batteries for a shopping go-cart), with large electrolytic caps in parallel to the bridge rectifier?

Yes, that is how I am charging my capacitor. You do not mean you are replacing the mag-amp toroids with 2 MOTs, correct? But replacing an input transformer to the toroid with a MOT to saturate the mag amp toroid's core with a higher voltage and the other MOT replacing the output transformer? In my original diagram, I only showed one output transformer for the sake of simplicity. In reality, I have put two transformer primary windings in series to have two output transformers to siphon off more energy. I replaced the original output transformers (Radioshack 50VA 5:1 Transformers) that I was using with two microwave oven transformers (MOT). Two microwave oven transformers now constitute the output

transformers. There is another MOT in the circuit that is not shown for the sake of diagrammatic simplicity. It is delivering EMF to my control winding because of the incredibly large inductance of the control winding. This way I can deliver enough current to the winding. The circuit has three MOT's, One powering the control winding, and two acting as output transformers. Dave, if I understand what you said clearly - I don't think you can't use i^2*R for the coils to get input power due to the phase angle. Using that actually will give you higher input power calculations than acutal, so the reported efficiencies you report would be actually LOWER than the actual efficiencies (if my reading of your post was correct). You would be under-reporting how good the system really is. If my memory serves me correctly, using (SQRT(2)/2)*V*I*cosine(angle) is better and will give you the RMS power value. Yeah, I understand this, but the way that I am measuring this, I am looking for REAL losses that come from the resistances in the wire. i^2R is the real power losses within the modulation winding. Because I am not trying to multiply the EMF at the terminals of the control winding by the current going into the winding (which would have a phase angle associated) , I don't need to worry about phase angle. No matter what the phase angle of ANY circuit, i^2R represents the resistive losses regardless.

You probably got that all figured out but I wanted to be clear in case someone else also read that as I did. If I may offer a suggestion, since your input power supply to the Toroids is a Variac and your Constant Current supply is also a Variac... I suggest just plugging each variac through a couple of kill-a-watt meters to get total power for each of those to cut off any naysayers to what the real input power is - since that would include all core losses and any other power being used at that point of power input. It would also eliminate arguments that it's some phase angle issue. Yeah, I have thought about that, but wanted to get other people up to speed with replication information first. I don't need to convince anybody else so long as I can build something that works.

You could also use a bridge rectifier and large cap at the output to produce a DC voltage over your known resistance to eliminate any power calculation errors there that some may claim. Yeah, I have analyzed the hell out of this using DMM, Analog MM, and two different scopes, one with math functions to be able to project a Power wave on the screen. I am convinced that this is real. The heat from the resistors burns me and makes my lab smell like electrical fire. There is very little doubt in my mind of what I am seeing. Response in blue above. Dave

Originally Posted by David G Dawson David, Well done! Thankyou for the clear and precise information transfer. Planned some years back to do the Marks TPU but had too many questions and so have two open grained Toroids here of 3" and 4.75". What size Toroid are you using please? Is there anything that you feel you would like or need to change to improve performance that you may have considered? One comes to mind where the Toroids are wound on top vice alongside where energy transfer may be greater - a greater surface area of contact so to speak. Asking these questions as I will probably replicate. Chris Carson in Video 4&5 of the SBARC Lecture series, shows us a Toroid where it is said to act like a sponge in receiving the induced magnetic energy from the Primary Coil but then on the Secondary side how do we really get that same energy induced into the Copper if the Toroid Iron 'is acting like a sponge'? Does anybody have an answer for this, David, Eric? Have been looking for Chris Carson's Video on his electrostatic rotating capacitor device but cannot find it. Can anybody help please as it appears to be no longer available? Thankyou for pointing me to the Silver Mica Capacitors for high voltage as I had neglected the Audio Amp side. Building Aluminium chassis here for the Regen Magnifying Receiver and looking at an adjustable power supply that covers about 200v to 1200v and found one in the 1964 ARRL Handbook on page 237 - uses voltage regulators for each adjusting group. Next is a Bias supply and the pages after the above also have some good schematics. Will upload later into Files at 'n6kph' for those interested. The 3 major problems with Vacuum Tube technology is a suitable chassis, suitable power supply and suitable bias supply. I have never considered Vacuum Tubes as ever being a problem like the 3 above. Thanks. Smokey Hey Smokey, Those toroid dimensions sound like they will be comparable to mine. Here is the toroid that I used: Toroidal O-Core OA-250 One thing that I would do differently for experimental purposes would be to make taps or have multiple inductors that constitute the power winding. The reason for this is because if you want to try to parameter vary any decent amount of Constant Current, you are met with the unwanted magnetizing force inside the core that is developed from the power winding. I have 184 turns in each power winding so when the current is .4 Amps, the magnetizing force is 260 At/m. This is less than a desirable condition. The more saturated the core is, the less the magnitude of peak to peak current that is being induced by the parameter variation. Having taps or multiple power windings, you can experiment with different levels of constant current, magnetizing force, and inductance to determine where the ideal operating point is. I think the goal for getting real usable power out of this thing is to have a decent size constant current while not saturating the cores of the magamp OR the cores of the output tranformers. I think the output

transformers will be a bit more forgiving if saturated due to fact that they still see a dPhi/dt that drops the core to back below saturation, thus still generating an EMF, only distorted on one half cycle. (1) Finding the most efficient operating point of the constant current on the magamp hysteresis loop, (2) creating a large enough inductance change seen by the constant current, and (3) keeping the constant current high enough to cause a wider window for EMF to be developed at the output transformer's secondary winding will be the three main issues that you will have to fight with. They are all opposing one another. A change in one, affects the others. I still can't conceive in my head the idea of the energy conveyance between the primary and secondary of a toroidal transformer. In the SBARC video, they say most of the magnetism stays within the toroid, yet they say that a magnetic line of force must terminate upon itself in a closed loop. Do the magnetic lines of force produce by the primary just "appear" inside of the toroid? Or do they expand outward from the primary, cutting the secondary windings as they find their home inside of the saturating core? I believe the latter to be true due to the fact that when I put a magnet near an energized toroid transformer, the magnet vibrates like hell. Eric seems to have a different explanation that I have yet to be able to fully grasp. Did Chris Carson have a video of his electrostatic generator? I never saw that... Dave