Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Degree of Data
1st Degree. Explicitly Declared
2nd Degree. Inferred
Data Quality
Accurate
Complete Timely
Access Rights
User
Friend of User 3rd Party Everyone
Data Publisher
User
System 3rd Party
Explicit
Implicit
Analysis of 30 technical systems from Ubicomp and Mobile HCI conferences based on the properties shown on the table above. The analysis shows the catalyst role of location data in inferring and aggregating other data, even noncontextual data.
30
30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Total Systems
15 5 27%
17% 56%
Systems where location affects primarily the type of info published Systems where location affects but NOT primarily the type of info published Systems where location does NOT affect the type of info published
Systems that Systems with 3rd make 3rd degree degree inferences inferences without semantic relation to location data
IMDb 49 45
Very Concerned
54%
71% Yes Maybe
7%
39%
11% 18%
49 52
Somewhat concerned
21 22
Not very concerned
Wikipedia
No
Scenario-based questions for the users of each app: Would you publish your location in this app in this scenario?
- An online survey with 150 participants. - Real-life scenarios were used (e.g. posting about a concert on Twitter) to investigate peoples behaviour regarding location data (right figure); - Likert scale questions were used to explore peoples attitudes in theory (left figure). - No correlation between peoples attitudes and their answers to the scenarios. - Participants were also asked to justify their answer to each scenario. The purpose was to explore the underlying reasons for their decisions. The thematic analysis shows that privacy decisions can be seen as part of a process of structuration, where attitudes and values (peoples free agency) are tempered by situation and context (external structure).
Comfortable sharing my location No use of sharing my location Application Benefits (convenient) Concerns over data manipulation Public event / work-related Private event