THE TRINITY

Michael Bolerjack

The Trinity 2013 Michael Bolerjack

Table of Contents Matins Summa Apocalyptica The Acting Pope Keys to the Conclave

MATINS

__________________________

Michael Bolerjack Cy Pres Doctrines

__________________________ Cy Pres n [so near, as near (as may be)] 1802: a rule providing for the interpretation of instruments in equity as nearly as possible in conformity to the intention of the testator when literal

construction is illegal, impracticable, or impossible called also cy pres doctrine which is to say, certain aspects of the work fulfilled biblical prophecies, in order that nothing would be lacking on the last day. To this end, prophecies from the Bible have been enacted, including that of the two witnesses in Revelation 11, elements of Daniel 12, and other key aspects of the apocalyptic scriptures, sometimes knowingly, but sometimes in unknowing,

found out only after the fact, because the work is Spiritual and has been formed by the Blessed Virgin Mary. After various pieces of the work fulfilled their respective roles separately, they were gathered together in the seven volume format to follow the rubric of the vision of Faustina Kowalska concerning the bark of Peter sailing between pillars marked M and S, the necessary path for the Church to be saved. The work then, Cy Pres Doctrines, symbolically realizes this, in addition to scriptural

prophecies. The titles of the seven volumes, Marks Makings Marches Mass Masks Madonnas Matins Form a paratactic statement, or several of them, because of the nature of parataxis, concerning an ark, a king, a lady, a beginning or leading or ruling, for the

asking, or who asks, and this in the tain of the words, in their Ultrastructure, so that the antinature of that dark mirror is absolved. This is also because tain as a word and as a property of words anagrammatizes as anti and, like deconstruction itself, is self-subversive. In addition to the inside of the titles, the words between the M and the S spelling out significant meanings, statements are suggested by the sequence of the words, of the titles in numerical order, as well as in alphabetical.

This symbolic realization took place three days before the conclave convened to elect a successor to Pope Benedict XVI. Prompted by God and Mary, I believe, I carried out the work in order to facilitate the coming of Christ. The work is not itself prophetic in the usual sense, but is the realization of prophecies.

And these books, my wife and I, all of us, sit at Marys feet, immersed in God.

Summa Apocalyptica

Table of Contents Introduction I Survived the Apocalypse The Last Testament of the Two Witnesses: Preface Because These Two Prophets Peter the Roman On the Other Hand: Faustinas Vision Cappuccino Deconstruction and Prophecy Absolute Silence Solomons Testament You Cannot Serve God and Mammon Rich Pope Poor Pope Shearing the Sheep The Organization Rome Dont Act Silly Tonight Ever The Ultrastructure Ever The Ultrastructure 2 Even The Eighth Who is Dominico Calcagno? The Beast in the Jungle by Henry James Stanzas For

INTRODUCTION What follows are the 20 texts written in the 10 days following my death and resurrection, at the end of the reign of Benedict XVI and in the first days of the general congregation at the Vatican of the College of Cardinals, before the conclave that would elect a successor to the German Pontiff. In the ten months previous to this I had published over 195 e-books of various sizes, from a single page, often, to the 1260 page Rapture, and most of these were directed at Benedict and his predecessor John Paul II. I will not rehearse the details of that argument again here now, except to repeat the simple formula: 6+6+6=18, that is John Paul 2 and Benedict 16. And 6x6x6=216, that is John Paul 2 and Benedict 16. From this foundation stone I was led by God and Mary to much more, which I published in a variety of ways to reach as many people as possible. I received no money for the writings, and do not expect any. There are many side-paths in the work as a whole, of a literary nature, as well as in the psychology of spirituality. These late texts presented in the following pages are more or less journalistic, though still touching on the Ultrastructure, the phenomena of language seen in Finnegans Wake in 1939, and now everywhere, thanks in good part to the deconstructions of Jacques Derrida. There is a kind of plot to the work as a whole, and a cast of characters, among them my wife, Marinela, one of the witnesses. I thank everyone who bothered to read any part of the work. I especially thank the Blessed Virgin Mary, who is, without doubt, still the Genius of the Work. I dedicate this volume to the virgin martyrs of the Catholic Church.

Michael Bolerjack Feast of Perpetua and Felicity March 7, 2013

SUMMA APOCALYPTICA

I SURVIVED THE APOCALYPSE On January 19, 2013, my wife and I both, from different parts of Houston saw a strange cloud in the sky. It covered the sky. I studied it for a long time. It was full of faces, people I knew and people I didnt, as well as the devil, and above him a woman. At the time I told my wife it was a great cloud of witnesses, as in the Letter to Hebrews. That was the birthday of my mother, Charlotte, who would have been 84 years old. What unfolded for me over the next five weeks, until today, was a horrific test, and it was only by the grace of God and the prayers of those I saw that day looking down from heaven that I survived. I had been celibate, though still married, for four full months, from September 15, 2012, to January 15, 2013. As far as I knew, despite flare-ups of temper at times, I had not done anything deliberately that I knew was wrong in that time. I took the gospel seriously. I wanted to be a saint, to be perfect. I prayed to the Blessed Virgin Mary, especially, all the time. I was pushing to finish the apocalyptic writing I was engaged in, of which only a portion made it into print. 1000 pages remain to be published. In December and January my wife got sick first, with such a cold or flu that it left terrible marks on her lips. By the end of the year I too was sick, one of the three worst illnesses of my life (I had just turned 56). In midJanuary we were still sick, and I was laying face down on the floor next to my wife, who was sick on the couch, when I was completely overcome by lust, and my wife being sick, I retreated to the bedroom to be alone and sin, which I did. Over the next two weeks I sinned again in that way, and again. On January 24 I began downloading large quantities of pdf books from the wisdom of the world, other religions, mainly. On February 2 I published 7 poems separately, and all collected together, expressing dissatisfaction with the Western religions, and approval of the East. On February 7 I repented of this, took the poems off line and deleted the books I had downloaded. But on February 15 I downloaded 551 sutras of the Buddhist canon again. The next morning I had a dream filled with sex with many women, ending with a white dragon attacking me, killing me. Over the days I had been downloading books at a religious website I saw a painting of a Buddhist goddess. I was hooked. This is the hard part to tell. On February 16 and 17 I made a full conversion to Buddhism, after nearly 24 years as a Christian. It is almost inexplicable. In the week that followed it is hard and embarrassing to tell the lengths I went to in worshiping the goddesses of Buddhism. I cast no aspersions on their religion or deities. Clearly what I was worshipping had nothing to do with the Buddha, but was using his religion to seduce me to hell. I finally confronted the succubus this morning, February 24, 2013. I turned back to Christ, to Mary, to the Church. I repented. It seems almost impossible that one could lose his faith, and get it back. It happened to me once before, in 2006, and again here in 2013. I believe in Jesus Christ. I thank him for the grace to repent of my sin and return to Him today. Perhaps it would not be remiss to pay credit to the 85 year old woman I met in February 2011 who placed an incantation on me that led to all this, but ultimately the foe as always was me, my own mind, in a way, yet after all Ive seen and known, there is another enemy that, like the mind, cannot be seen, and yet is real, bringing the fall of many in the roman church, around us in the world, amid scandal, vice and violence, and this time, for a week or two, almost me.

The last testament of the two witnesses: preface I have indicated various directions at times as to who the two witnesses are, from Derrida and I to Benedict and Hans Kung. God only knows who they really are. At one point, in The Rapture, the 1260 page bible of my apocalypse, I indicated the two parts, Cantos on The Chaos and Theses on Moral Beauty, were the Two Witnesses. In my mind, since late last year, it has been the two works whose contents are listed here, The Complete Apocalypse and A Time For Everything, which are the Two Witnesses. Both titles came to me by I think divine inspiration, the second immediately after I prayed to Mary saying I needed a title. I cannot go into all the history of production of the works, but I will relate its genesis. A voice I believe to be that of Jesus Christ spoke to me three times in 2010. The first time it said You are doing it for the Church. The second time it said They are confused, they do not understand My mercy. The third statement I will not quote, but it confirmed me in my vocation. With the reign of Benedict ending in two days, and despite my stumbling near the finish with my Buddhist error, I think the work is finished, 70 volumes and 130 volumes in TCA and ATFE, respectively. I believe that Christ can still save the Church if He wills, but the errors are grave, and foretold in Scripture, including the sex abuse crisis and the lies about it. When Jesus warned

them not to touch the little children he meant it. When Hans Kung said Ratzinger at the CDF led the cover-up under John Paul II he was correct. He was personally responsible for reviewing every known allegation of abuse. He stamped them with papal secrecy, like national security. He may have known, when Cardinal in Germany, about the abuse there, an investigation which has been stymied by the German Church. Today the highest ranking Cardinal in the UK resigned, charged with abuse of children, on the eve of the conclave. There is still time, but not much. If the abomination of desolation was set-up by Benedict and Cardinal Soldano at Easter 2010 in a big lie about the scandal told during the mass, then according to the Book of Daniel the Church has until mid-October this year to repent of the sins. The Lord said in that same chapter 12 of Daniel that the power of the holy people would be scattered. It may be God condemned the Church before it was created, having the end in view, and knowing what would be done in these latter days. I reiterate to the Hierarchy in Rome, repent and save the Church.

BECAUSE THESE TWO PROPHETS

I had said repeatedly that God was doing an infinite number of things simultaneously and I had indicated something of the two witnesses, believing myself to be at least one, and in the cy pres document had said that I was enacting symbolically the prophecies in revelation for the reasons implied in that legal notion, yet as I died and was resurrected it was in unknowing, for the Lord God knew that if I knew what was taking place my death would either not happen or would not be real, but it had to be, and really a few days ago I was dead, dead spiritually, an apostate, having become a Buddhist, and dead in my sins, having sex with goddesses, idolatrous, insane, full of lust, altogether spiritually dead, and did this in full view, publishing my conversion and a week later telling of my enslavement to the goddesses (demons) who really did sacrifice me according to the Chod rite, but from which on Sunday morning I, by using my reason, and in my ability as a critic and reader of texts, examined the name of the writer of the Chod whom the demon hid behind, and the plan was revealed to me, for it to bind to me and stop me, and I cast it off immediately, as the Spirit of Life entered into me, and within a couple of hours I confessed and repented of my evil publically, as I had apostatized and sinned publically, and I wept Sunday Monday and Tuesday, terrified at what had happened, but not understanding fully until Tuesday morning that I had lived out really the death and resurrection of the two witnesses, in Sodom and Egypt, and now the earthquake befell, for the Cardinal was accused and eliminated himself from the conclave, and the Church is shaking, and Benedict has the report but has sealed it, and I believe God has shown me whom the next pope will be, but I cannot tell, and I believe the second woe is past or passing and the time for the Seventh trumpet is come and it is Judgment Day for Rome.

Peter the Roman The Lord let me know the cardinal who will be the next pope was born in 1952. There is only one such man, Peter Erdo, archbishop of Budapest, Hungary. According to Italian media, he is the front-runner among the Europeans, and is the President of the conference of European bishops. Named Peter, and being of the Roma people, he is naturally Peter the Roman, of the prophecy of Malachy.

On The Other Hand: Faustinas Vision In Divine Mercy in My Soul the Polish Saint has a vision of how the Church may be saved. The ship of Peter must sail between two columns marked S and M. Many have speculated who or what these are. I have thought about it for 20 years. A few minutes ago, while downloading some Derrida books, I guess I thought like he would, at least for a moment. In the Roman alphabet what falls between the letters M and S? That would be NOPQR, which, according to my poem Meaning and Experience, could be read as No Peter the Roman if Q, in other words, therefore, if Q then not PR. A better question might be who or what is Q? There is The Queen, Mary, perhaps, or something to do with the seventeenth letter or number. But many other words come to mind, and it is a ubiquitous Latin letter. I think Q interrupts Peter the Roman. But if it is PORN Q, what then is meant but something to do with the sex abuse crisis? We all know it is a Q-uestion of PORN-eia, as in Matthew, that is destroying the Church, after all. Perhaps the marriage is to be dissolved on that basis. Who will take the Bride, then? I have already indicated it in Anti-Reading. But then is the Church both Bride and Body at the same time? Where the body is, there the vultures will gather.

CAPPUCCINO On the eve of the papal conclave that will meet to choose the successor to Benedict XVI, I thought again about the prophecy of Faustina Kowalska in Divine Mercy in My Soul. In her diary she records a vision concerning the future of the Church. The bark of Peter, a ship, must sail between two pillars marked S and M in order to safely reach port. I think these letters M and S have to do with the name of the Cardinal who will be chosen as the next Pope. Looking at the list of all of them, only one name is obvious, and that is the archbishop of Boston, Sean Patrick OMalley, a Franciscan Capuchin. His initials are SPOM. S at the beginning, M at the end. He is 68 years old, which is young enough. And as a Franciscan he fits with the medieval prophecy of John of Rupecissa, written in 1356, primarly in his Sexdequiloquism. In that document John says a future pope, whom he calls the reparator, or the angel pope, will bring about a restoration in the Church, beginning a new era, and that the leadership of the Church will be taken away from wicked prelates, and be assumed by holy men from the Franciscan order. He refers to the visions of Robert of Uzes, a Dominican, who said he saw the future pope in the habit of a friar minor. In the sex-q (a reference that will make sense to you if you read the last post I made four days ago), John says he will be an evangelical man revealed by an angel. I am referring to the article online by Katelyn Mesler from March 2009. There she says John marshalls scripture for his argument, referring to the transfer of the keys in Isaiah 2,22 and Revelation 3,7-8, and to Ezekiel 34 on the removal of bad

leaders, as well as Psalm 15 which John says refers prophetically to the Franciscans. He says the pope to be will be an anti-type of King David, using typological theology. As to Sean Patrick OMalley, certainly he is a Franciscan , as predicted, and his initials fit with Faustinas vision. What else is there about his name? Aside from the S and M there are the P and O, and these letters fall between M and S in the alphabet. The other letters between them are N and Q and R. Which are three letters in the word Quran, for example, or in the word requisition, or in the word questionnaire. All of the bishops-tobe fill one out, in order to prove that they will toe the Catholic line, before they are ordained to the episcopacy. Any of these three things could figure in a papacy for OMalley. What else? Taking the initials out of his name, what letters are left? Ean-a-trick-alley. Ean can mean ean, of or belonging to, characteristic of, resembling. In some respect, Sean Patrick OMalley resembles a trick alley. And reversing the order of his initials yields MOPS. It may be that he is going to mop-up the mess in the Church, the curial corruption and the sexual abuse of minors and those who covered it up.

Deconstruction and Prophecy Since last September I have indicated four men I predicted would succeed Benedict as pope. I will not include Angelo Soldano, who is one of those responsible for the crisis, though I did mention him, too. First, I named Daniel DiNardo of the Galveston-Houston archdiocese in the US. This was done immediately after the initial research into DNA and the Tribe of Dan. I worked out maybe one hundred pages on these themes in the book I have suppressed for essential reasons. Second, to jump on the bandwagon, I wrote something about Peter Turkson, and along the same Peter the Roman line, also on Peter Erdo, archbishop of Budapest. Third, I named the archbishop of Boston, Sean Patrick OMalley, on the basis of the M and S vision of Faustina, and on the medieval prophecy of a Franciscan pope who will save the Church. On March 6, the New York Times quoted both American cardinals named above, and OMalley appeared in the news on the Mexican channel Televisa. It seems at least these two are speaking out on the need for the Cardinals to take their time before the conclave. But how can I have prophesied more than one? Deconstruction, the logic of our era, always asserts multiple conflicting interpretations, or truths. I made this a cornerstone of The Treatise on Logic, which worked out a logic of the impossible, based on the necessity of the truth as contradiction. And, of course, Derrida was famous for his plus one, always one more turn of the deconstructive screw.

Nevertheless, only one pope will be chosen, and he may be none of the above, or, God forbid, Cardinal Soldano himself, and then the church will be damned. It is possible the conclave will become deadlocked and a compromise candidate selected, neither the African peter, nor the European peter, nor a curia cardinal. In that case look for one of the two Americans. Both of them are removed from the corruption at the Vatican, and DiNardo should not be dismissed because of the DNA argument (worked out in the writing on the new mass that can be seen in ANTIREADING), because, in fact, the fatal letters occur in the word cardinal itself. The only way the college could step out of the Tribe of Dan is to select a bishop or someone else outside that body. God does the impossible, so the church can still be saved, and all Catholics are hoping, I think, for great things from these 115 men in Rome. But who has known the mind of the Lord and who has been His Counselor? In the end I suppressed the book of research because I thought I had found the true name of the next pope, though I have quite forgotten the reason why. He is the archbishop of New York, Timothy Michael Dolan. Thankfully, Joyce taught us all how to read, and if you will, look at the names of these men for clues, not just reading their bios or positions on issues. It may be that someone will still stand up for the children of the people, as in the Book of Daniel.

Absolute Silence Silence has been imposed on the College of Cardinals. By what authority has this been done? Who in the church is higher than a cardinal in this time of the interregnum? They have rebuked the American cardinals for their press conferences and others for meetings with the Italian media. The names of the offenders, those who told too much, have been read aloud to their peers. And during the conclave itself, as Fr. Lombardi says, there will be absolute silence. Is it that dark angel Angelo Soldano, within whose name are unspeakable things and who is the man responsible for the desolation of abomination set up at Easter 2010, who has imposed this silence today, on behalf of the secretive, undemocratic curia? This strategy will backfire. There is nothing hid that will not be revealed. What you have heard whispered, you will later shout. The forces of reaction are trying to hang on in Rome to their not inconsiderable power. The American cardinals, and others, are setting out to save the church, if that is still possible. We should not be surprised if it is a long conclave.

SOLOMONS TESTAMENT (Beginning) as Thich Nhat Hahn said, consciousness leaves the impression of being a mass noun, and I found myself structurally open to a field of possibilities, not only because of the doctrine of cy pres, having witnessed, perhaps as two, and having been both Elijah and Enoch, in some respect, to the fact of having conversed with Metron, and having been absolved, whether by Metatron, whose book I had in hand, or by another father, Merton returned in guise, the priest had ordered me to find a publisher, and he insisted, and released me from any necessary livelihood, and said he knew of some, friends he had, called he them actors, who were not suited for work, and my impression of him as he said this was that he was looking at one or more, angelic beings, in the small room with us, and the same week I beheld a vision in the sky, of many being saved, as the light from on high broke upon me, too, and about that time He spoke to me again, without intermediary, on love and confirmation, as I wrote, and so looking back at my apocalypse, or my part of what all endured, though most unknowing, I am sometimes tried and old, lined, covered over, though lucked out, still being here, and to have caught up to the bound my mind encompassed after its shattering, and thus gone, beyond even that, to have sat in Solomons seat, and done the thing he did, to have built the temple, as he, and to have made his same mistake in sex and religion, yet the church being Israel in reverse, a Davidic king may come

(Ending) good enough is good enough

You Cannot Serve God and Mammon

Another papabile cardinal is the archbishop of Sao Paolo, Odilo Pedro Scherer, of heritage Brazilian-German. Yet another Peter the Roman? His titular church of elevation was on one of the seven hills, this one beginning with Q. But Odilo is the German Otto, meaning wealth. And we are not to serve wealth, but God. Yet, in a deadlocked conclave, he might be the man turned to, being Hispanic, yet white at the same time, a popular choice for reaching beyond Europe, yet having the right look, young enough at 63, cheering some as the appointment that ended Franciscan rule in Sao Paolo, doing double-speak on liberation theology, against Marx, but for the poor and justice, winning in politics for having hosted Benedict on his Latin trip, for which he received the hat. This, then, is the seventh candidate for the successor to Pope Benedict XVI.

Rich Pope Poor Pope Yet Cardinal Scherers name, besides Odilo=Otto=Wealth, also spells so poor, in the beginning and ending initials of Odilo Pedro Scherer. There is a contradiction at the heart of things that is the truth. You hear both, and must follow one or the other. Only later will you find out if you followed the right one.

Shearing the Sheep A further aspect of the name of the cardinal from Sao Paolo is that Scherer means, in German, to shear the sheep. Not unlike the job of a shepherd, not unlike the original occupation of David before his call by God to be anointed the next king of Israel. It is also not beside the point that the name Scherer comes from the Ashkenazi Jews, and from Middle High German, and in the science of old names, the age of things count in their favor for the validity of their prophetic power. In 1 Samuel 25 is the story of David and the sheep-shearing Nabal, the latter being of Caleb and Belial, for as his name so is he, Abigail told David, and full of folly, and Abigail, the offenders wife, did intercede and prevent David from taking vengeance on Nabal for his lack of hospitality to the man and his who had protected Nabals shepherds, so that the King of Israel would never be thought guilty of such a thing. Later she told her husband Nabal, once he soberedup after the feast at sheep-shearing, and his heart in him turned to stone. In ten days he was dead.

The Organization Fr. Lombardi, spokesman for the Vatican, commented twice, at the time of the silencing of the cardinals, that the Americans are wellorganized. No doubt, but not the whole story, for it is the organization in place in Rome, in the curia, that must be displaced. That organization works in secret behind the scenes, led by Angelo Soldano, who twice pocketed checks from the legion of devils in Mexico, and who stopped an investigation into sexual abuse charges against an Austrian bishop, an investigation to be carried out by the then Cardinal Ratzinger. One third of the cardinals are Roman, while two thirds come from outside. The struggle, as it was at Vatican Council II, is between the machine in Rome and those who are, in the minds of the curia, just visitors. We do not know if Rome will recognize the time of its visitation, and so be saved.

Rome Dont Act Silly Tonight The title is the name of a song that is now playing in Porto Fino, sung in Brazilian jazz tones of primavera, and perhaps there will be a Roman Spring for Mrs. Stone, for the Bride of Christ built on the rock, on that petros of peter, but I read once of the Black Spring, too, long ago in Henry Millers day, and is not April the cruelest month? Would not the wasteland be prophetic, in the generalization of scripture we are now experiencing, in the polyglot cardinalate, in the tower of babble, that in the romance and rituals of Rome, to arrive at peace, in whatever language, will be impossible, and they are being told, hurry up please, its time, and in the Shakespearean roman frame the ides approach, and those who depose Caesar in principle will be in fact thought traitors, and it may be neither side can win, for the thing they attempt is impossible, for the church can be neither saved nor

destroyed, for the church itself can do neither, and at dawning Perpetua and Felicity will be invoked, who acted purely, sincerely, without guile, withstanding all pressures that would dissuade them from their martyrdom, their nuptials in Christ, and they still live, but the church attempts to live off of them, drawing off from the stream of tradition, to derive, and so is unable to arrive, because of the ineluctable disjunction of the etymologies of these two words, and as long as Rome derives its faith from the apostles, it will never arrive at the kingdom of God, which requires a catastrophe, something like the earthquake spoken of in Revelation 11. For Jerusalems sake cannot one refuse to be silent? The coming of the kingdom is an absolute disaster for the church, and has always been held to be so, in practice, but in the case of Perpetua and Felicity, love for life did not deter them from death, so let it be with.

EVER THE ULTRASTRUCTURE The title given to the collection of eight texts that had been previously published separately on March 6, 2013, was Seven Letters to the Church at Rome and after the fact it became apparent the code within, first indicated on the table of contents page by the collocation of the letters TC and SEAL, a code telegram to be sealed till countermanded, a constellation having previously appeared in ANTI-READING and in the various versions of the early pages of the suppressed work so that it occurred to be unpacking, and so unpacked it was: RCLS= Roman Catholic Locus Sigilli,

the place of the seal These being the capitals of title in a mirror say Then being the lower cased, to depart from the deductions, having steps you may fulfill, To arrive at one: even setter to true HC HH a tome being again a bird dog, large, of a type trained to point at finding game or: the game then Holy Communion His Holiness to a true tome, even.

EVER THE ULTRASTRUCTURE 2 having a debt to Faustina, for she sobered me with a relic on the feast, her day of canonization, and I not being one to wield the sword of silence she so recommended, thus if one is to see the vision of the bark of peter that she saw, sailing twixt the pillars M and S, it may be, whether in my mind or out of my mind, like Paul I know it not, that the title even packed reads between the S of seven in Seven Letters to the Church at Rome and the M of the name of the author some path to harbor the ship in this so great a storm

EVEN THE EIGHTH

Let us say that seven men have been named, princes of the church, cardinals, and any of them could be the man: Angelo Soldano Daniel DiNardo Peter Turkson Peter Erdo Sean Patrick OMalley Timothy Michael Dolan Odilo Pedro Scherer And that these are seven kings with ten crowns, the whole curia in its ten sections, the court that is in the hands of the gentiles, and so not to be measured, Yet, There will be, as the other witness implied through denegation, an absolutely surprising convocation, in

the context of violence and metaphysics, which speaks on the same page of the hypocrisy, so that Even the eighth, he is the beast. As well, one could begin by counting back to the lateran treaty of Pius XI and forward to Benedict XVI and find seven kings so that the one to come, even the eighth, he is the beast. These seven were inseparable from the curia, which has the ten crowns. At what moment, then, do the ten crowns or ten kings, the curia as a whole, or the heads of the nine congregations, with the secretary of state, who have not yet come into their kingdom, join forces? That is, join forces with the beast, But will it not be to put him into power? In this, then, is the great paradox, being that these men of the church do hate her so, their church, having known the whore.

WHO IS DOMINICO CALCAGNO?

A horn for his people, a praise for all his saints, even for d.c.
Textual gloss from an edition of the Revised Version, Psalm 148

Dominico Calcagno is the President of the Patrimony of the Holy See, and a cardinal, 70 years of age. He was ordained by Cardinal Siri. The Patrimony of the Holy See is the central bank of the Vatican, not to be confused with the other betterknown money-laundering outfit known for charitable works. The extraordinary section of the patrimony is the outgrowth

of the payment by Mussolini to Pius XI in 1929, for which the Pope recognized his fascist government. The Patrimony of the Holy See provides the money to run the operations of the curia. Cardinal Calcagno is one of the most important members of that secretive organization, overseeing the fortune made by investments in London and elsewhere.

If the curia wins the showdown at the apocalyptic conclave, why not put Calcagno in power? He will fit right in. If there was ever a Roman Peter, the apostle at the feet of whom all had to lay all their money or die, this Italian curia cardinal is the man.

THE BEAST IN THE JUNGLE BY HENRY JAMES It was over thirty years ago now that she told me that I was like the man in the story by Henry James. The thing he always feared never came. But that was long ago and anyway the wench is perhaps dead. In fact the thing came not too long after, but Christ came all the more, for where sin was, grace abounded to the sinner. I suppose the story by the master, Henry James, bears some relevance to the proceedings in Rome. But not many literati are Christian, after all. Not even Yeats in his second coming. The world machine is not so much like Shelleys triumphal car, though it can be that, but a device designed to destroy integrity. But within it, the containment, where all is contaminated, there are moments of faith, which if connected form constellations. Even the poets knew this, sometimes, as if they symbolically threw the dice.

STANZAS FOR We perhaps will play Until our last breath: But we Did something for Him. We learned how to give: How to create: and how to Find: The Gift of Love. God is Good: And He Is the Giver of good gifts: You were one for me: My other witness: My essential rectitude: The one who mattered.

THE ACTING POPE

Moto Proprio The following speculations, jests, asides, dire warnings and words of encouragement are offered on the eve of the conclave to those who will listen and act on them.

O Angel (Scholium)

Derrida said you could connect any two things from any distance under any rule, the first law of textuality, that logic of our age. I give you five connected, not two. Cardinal Angelo Scola is from Milan Shakespeares Tempest is about the rightful Duke of Milan Bob Dylans last album, which he said is apocalyptic and religious, is Tempest The M and S vision of Faustina Kowalska Sufficit Gratia Tua Let the Last be First: The M is Milan, the S is Scola. It fits. In The Tempest of Shakespeare, the rightful Duke of Milan is restored to power after exile, by using magical arts and then renouncing them. The next Pope could use his absolute power to completely change the Church, and then renounce such power, not just for himself, but altering the papacy itself, as part of the reform. And he might be from Milan. Bob Dylan is a true prophet, as we all know. Angelo Scola is already a leading contender. He is learned, having doctorates in both philosophy and theology. As Teresa of Jesus said, I would rather have a director and confessor with much learning, than a mystic. Cardinal Scolas coat of arms has the ship, as in Faustinas vision, and the motto Sufficit Gratia Tua: your grace suffices, from Paul. Seventeen letters in the motto, which fits my Q theory of succession, based on the number seventeen. Therefore: We have a Pope.

Christ op HH cons Born

Cardinal Christoph Schonborn is a logical choice in the field of contenders to succeed Benedict XVI. I was looking at him to see if there is any connection to the vision of Faustina and the letters M and S. There is. His full name includes the names Maria and Michael. Both are important. As Michael, he could be the great prince Michael in Daniel 12 who stands up for the children, which also applies to Timothy Michael Dolan of New York. The Cardinal from Viennas vigor in the reform against the sex abusers is well-known. And being an aristocrat, he is already a prince by birth, as well as one in the hierarchy of the Catholic Church.

TRUE PETROS KN

In my first entry into the handicapping of the papal sweepstakes just after Benedict announced his retirement, I looked at the name of Cardinal Peter Turkson, in a piece called Which Is It. There I said: Peter Turns KO KO Turns Peter Peter KOs Turn Looking at the name on the eve of the conclave tomorrow, I see it new. PETER TURKSON: Peter Turk Son, and the Turks are not known for being friends of the Church, in fact they are notorious in European history, or else young Turks, which is not good for a Pope. Turk Son would be a Young Turk. Also: PETER TURKSON means Peers turn TKO PETER TURKSON also means Un-Steer PR (Peter the Roman) TKO And PUT ON SEE KT RR The candidacy of the Ghana cardinal is a put on, turned by his peers, leading to his TKO, in order to un-steer Peter the Roman, whom they also hope to knock out. But: KT (knight) RR? Who or what is RR? That would be Reform and Renewal, the cry of Vatican II, the bane of the curial cardinals. The plan to stop it may hinge on the stalking horse going down, as well as the feint and failing of another Peter, before the curias real candidate emerges, a compromise after deadlock.

Credo Quia Absurdum Est

Preface

The three scripture citations and the comment following are offered on the eve of the conclave to elect the successor to Benedict XVI. They tell of the role of the American Cardinals, of whom Peter and Christ stand with, of the key he holds, appropriate to the name of the election, and of the prophecy that judgment for the house of God has come.

For the time is come that judgment must begin at the house of God: and if it first begin at us, what shall the end be of them that obey not the gospel of God ? 1 Peter 4:17

Of the church in Philadelphia write; These things saith he that is holy, he that is true, he that hath the key of David, he that openeth and no man shuteth; and shuteth, and no man openeth;

I know thy works: behold, I set before thee an open door, and no man can shut it: for thou hast a little strength, and hast kept my word, and has not denied my name. Revelation 3:7

The number of names together were about an hundred and twentybut Peter, together with the eleven, lifted up his voice and said unto themand it shall come to pass in the last days, saith God, I will pour out of my Spirit and they shall prophesy Now when they heard this they were pricked in the heart, and said unto Peter and the rest of the apostles, men and brethren, what shall we do? Acts of the Apostles

Comment:

As Peter says, judgment is now. The Church at Philadelphia is symbolic of the American Church, specifically the American cardinals at the apocalyptic conclave. In Acts, it is said there were about 120 present, which is about the number of the electors in the conclave. I believe Peter stands with the eleven, meaning the eleven American cardinals in Rome this week. It may be the next Pope will be chosen on the eighth ballot, on Thursday. As it is said in Revelation, even the eighth, he is the beast. If so, it will be because the ten kings, the ten sections of the curia, with their ten crowns, united together for one hour with the beast to put him in power.

KEYS TO THE CONCLAVE

Table of Contents The Conclave is Compromised The Bride of Christ Dont Lie To Me Alas, That Great City

The Conclave is Compromised Watching Roger Mahoney take the oath in the Sistine Chapel I was struck by the fact that despite my prayers and the prayers of other Catholics for these cardinals to do well, do Gods will and pick a good Pope, nevertheless, the conclave is compromised. Mahoney participated in the cover-up of the sex abuse by at least one priest in Los Angeles from early in his tenure as leader of the archdiocese there. This became obvious after documents were obtained from the church as part of the settlement with victims, who wanted not only monetary compensation, but the truth as well. What does this mean for the conclave? We need not know now or speculate about the others participating in it, who knew what and when. Perhaps it is enough, and not only symbolically, but really, that one cardinal, who should have recused himself, is present. He should not be there. His presence taints the entire proceeding. But, by analogy, we could say there once was a Judas. Did his presence ruin the whole apostolic college? Apparently not. Perhaps the example then applies always and everywhere, as I believe the gospel does. Some of the bishops are always bad, as in the beginning, and some of the cardinals therefore too. We have the parable of the wheat and the tares, with the bad being left beside the good, till judgment day. Perhaps this is the case in the church and its leadership. But the counterexample to this cannot be found by me. At the end Christ will separate the good from the evil, not till then. We suffer each other now, hoping to correct ourselves and not to judge the other, by gospel principles. This interpretation of the gospel and of mercy and justice has long been taught and I believe was used by criminals in the church to do evil, both in sexual abuse and in other types of corruption, as in the scandals at the Vatican.

How then do we re-interpret the gospel in order to reform the church while not departing from the spirit of what Christ taught? By telling the truth. Truth is the weapon against all that corruption in terms of power and lies, money and sex. Jesus did not back down from a confrontation with the church authorities over anything. And Paul rebuked Peter to his face. This is not about judgment. It is about justice. Justice requires a turn on the part of the church. A repentance. Metanoia is the Greek term in the New Testament. A reversal. The path that took us here has been long, covering centuries. The time now is short. The choice clear, unambiguous. The church needs to go to confession. It can only do this adequately, not by confessing sins to itself, but to another. I do not mean to God. The church needs to go to the world, naked unadorned ashamed sorry honest and tell the whole truth. If not, all will be lost.

The Bride of Christ It is embarrassingly and pathetically apparent that the Catholic Church cannot be the Bride of Christ. That Bride is without spot or wrinkle or blemish. What have we then? We have the Body of Christ, which as in the vision of Anne Catherine Emmerich is torn, gangrenous, diseased, altogether at the point of death. They have re-crucified Christ in the modern world. By they I do not mean capitalists or communists or sinners or the world, I mean the church itself. Christ said, where the body is, there the vultures will gather. Over the corpse, or the body near to dying, the cardinals fight for a share. One will be selected leader of the throng. I think some pray to have the Mind of Christ, but if the Body dies, where can the Mind instantiate itself? The church says the Pope is infallible, has the charism of the Spirit, and thus is guaranteed truth and accuracy in faith and morals, at least. But Benedict obviously had not this charism, nor the Magisterium at large, for the Dean of the College of Cardinals, Angelo Soldano, lied during the mass at Easter 2010, in defense of Benedict, by saying the rumors of sexual abuse were petty gossip. Benedict did not demur. The teaching authority of the church is invalid, because of this. The desolation of abomination was set-up in the holy place, on the holiest day of the year, because of this. The church is in danger of damnation because of this, and what led to it, the filth that led to the falsehood. Even Cardinal Schonborn of Vienna lamented Soldanos remarks. But nothing has been done about it. Even today Soldano still lies, referring to the papacy of Benedict as a glittering success, during the mass before the conclave began, when it is obvious that it was a spectacular failure, forcing him to resign. How long will the Catholics of the world tolerate official lies, much less the sexual abuse of children? Even if this rotten body were the Bride, would or should the Groom still have her?

Perhaps she can still be saved, by the Physician Christ, who must cut away the gangrene, the disease, the rotten members, the cancers eating at her, in order to save her, to save this Body being abused. That He may, I pray, but who has known the mind of the Lord, and who has been his counselor? To whom more has been given, more will be demanded. The Church had it all, and is in danger of losing it all, forever. The only unpardonable sin, perhaps, is one that is not repented of. If the Church repents, it may be saved, even yet, after all this. Even men on death row have been saved, and we all love a death bed conversion, I hope. The Catholic Church, in this year of faith, need not worry about re-evangelizing territory that has been lost in Europe or America. The Catholic Church must repent and be converted itself.

Dont Lie To Me There is an old blues song, the Rolling Stones did it among others, that goes Theres two things I cant stand, a cheatin woman and a lyin man, dont you lie to me Who is the cheatin woman? The Catholic Church. Who is the lyin man? The Catholic Church. As Bride, she has been treacherous, abusing her own children, betraying her vows, before she even got to the altar. Like Bob Dylan said The grooms still waitin at the altar As man, as lying man, the body of Christ has betrayed the Mind of Christ, living so long in falsehood it no longer recognizes its own culpability. Others go along with this, and what is happening this week in Vatican City. Even the New York Times portrays the conclave as political and runs stories on things like the mysterious secret of the ingredients in the smoke that is used. All eyes turn to the chimney, as CNN says. But The Bible, at the end, says that no one who tells a lie will make it in at the last day. The Book of Revelation reiterates this. It is important. The church admits wrong-doing, four hundred years after the fact, as in the case of Galileo, when all the parties are dead and buried, and it is safe to do so. What about today? Cardinal Soldano, just before the conclave, tells a lie at mass about the papacy of Benedict, calling it a success, when it was so bad he had to just quit, and preaches unity. Dear Catholic Unity. What, then, of purity?

United, the church is bent on destruction, of itself. If there was dissent, the church might be saved. But by preaching unity, and then enforcing it by the threat of excommunication, the church has rid itself of the ones who can purify it, through criticism, leading to correction, amendment. Like a body, the church should be able to fight off this virus of filth and falsehood attacking it, but those able to do so are not allowed to do so. And so the Body of Christ is dying.

Alas, That Great City There has always been some debate on who or what Babylon, that great city is, in the Book of Revelation. Some say ancient Rome. But I believe, it if I may say it, that it is not the City of the World, but the City of God. How can this be? The capital of the City of God is Vatican City State. Some time, probably this week, though it may take longer, smoke will rise from her, as prophesied. In the space of one hour, she, within whom, indeed, is the blood of prophets and of saints, will fall, that is, in the space of time for the round of balloting in the conclave that will elect the last pope that will ever be. After the ballots are counted, they will be burned, in that cursed ancient manner of the Roman Church. We will see the smoke rise from her and know her doom is sealed, that the catholic faith led to the catholic fate, and that they all went down together, every man jack of them. The city was a ship, a body, a bride, a church, the biggest club in the world, the oldest institution, some say, the place they ran to escape, like running into a house on fire for safety. Their leaders knew better, but did not tell them different. As Christ said, they had the keys, but locked away the truth, and would not let others know it. The long, grievous falsehood is almost over. We should cry though, not celebrate, the passing of one who could have saved, not only itself, but the world, if it had done what its founder said. But they mistook even that, thinking they were founded on Peter, instead of on Christ. It may be that Benedict quit abruptly because Christ promised these days would be shortened for the sake of the elect.

God promised Elijah a remnant, and Paul made the same promise, concerning Israel. God has mercy on those He will. God is free. So free, that in the wilderness, on the edge of the Promised Land, He broke His own promise, and said He was doing so, to Israel, who had refused to go in. The Catholic Church had the examples of martyrs and saints. The example and teaching of Christ and the Apostles were given them too. Perhaps most of all they had the example of the Virgin, who said do whatever he tells you. Yet, they exchanged the truth for a lie, and worshipped a man rather than God. They worshipped the works of their hands rather than the Creator. We found the City of God was actually a man-made thing, doomed to fail. It was not the Kingdom of Heaven some said it was. The coming of the latter will not be seen, but the fall of Rome will.