Pipeline Hydraulic Design Proposal

(A39833)
Doc. No: BDE-QF- 09

Rev. 3.6
Page i of62
Issue Date: August 23 , 20 11
BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING
Hydraulic Design Proposal Mainline

Company Confidential
Pipeline Hydraulic Design Proposal

Northern Gateway Pipeline - 36" Crude Oil / 20" Condensate
Enbridge Pipelines Inc.
Project Code: <459.01>

Charge Code: 4032800002
Prepared by: Maury Porter, P. Eng I Yuntong She I Gary Carmichael
Revision: 3.6
Issue Date: August 23, 201 1
Note: This is a prelimimuy DRAFT (v3.6 dated August 23,2011) and has been issued for information only. It has not undergone a rigorous
review by internal stakeholder groups.
(A39833)
Doc. No: BDE-QF- 09
Rev. 3.6
Page 2 of 62
Issue Date: August 23 , 2011

DGE
Table of Contents
1
2
Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................ 3

Project Background & Scope of Work ................................................................................................ 4
2.1 Background ............................................................................................................................ 4
2.1.1
Revision History ......................................................................... 5
2.2 Scope of Work ....................................................................................................................... 6
2.2.1
Business Development Engineering - Hydraulics Design ..... 6
2.2.2
Facilities Management ............................................................... 6
Deliverables ................................................................................ 7
2.2.3
2.2.4 Assumptions ............................................................................... 7
2.2.5 Scope Not Included .................................................................. 11
3 Hydraulic Design ................................................................................................................................ 12
3.1 Pipeline Facilities ................................................................................................................ 13
3.1.1
J-Curves and Diameter Selection ............................................ 13
3.1.2
Line Description ....................................................................... 14
3.2 Pump Station Facilities ....................................................................................................... 17
3.2.1
Station Locations ..................................................................... 17
3.2.2
Pump Plan ................................................................................. 19
Power......................................................................................... 23
3.2.3
3.2.4 Variable Frequency Drive (VFD) .............................................. 31
3.2.5 Case Pressure Limits ............................................................... 32
Pump Standby .......................................................................... 33
3.2.6
3.3 Operational Limitations and Concerns .............................................................................. 35
3.3.1
Petroleum Quality and Batching ............................................. 35
Minimum Reynolds Number .................................................... 35
3.3.2
3.3.3
Maximum Mainline Fluid Velocities ........................................ 35
3.3.4 Operating Limits ....................................................................... 36
3.4 Pipeline Thermal Analysis ................................................................................................... 39
Annual Average Temperature Profile ..................................... 39
3.4.1
3.4.2 Maximum Temperature Analysis ............................................. 42
4 Transient Analysis .............................................................................................................................. 45
4.1 Crude Oil Pipeline System ................................................................................................... 45
4.2 Condensate Pipeline System .............................................................................................. 47
5 Risk Management ............................................................................................................................... 49
5.1 Risk Register ......................................................................................................................... 49
Appendix A: Product Specification ......................................................................................................... 50
Appendix B: Batch Plans .......................................................................................................................... 51
Appendix C: Pump Curves ....................................................................................................................... 52
Appendix D: Graphical Hydraulic Profiles .............................................................................................. 55
Appendix E: Sensitivity Analysis ............................................................................................................. 59
Pump Design Limit Basis ............................................................................................................. 59
Maximum Temperature Design Limit Basis ................................................................................. 61
Note: This is a preliminary DRAFT (v3.6 dated August 23, 2011) and has been issued for infomlation only. It has not undergone a rigorous
review by intemal stakeholder groups.
(A39833)
Doc. No: BDE-QF- 09
Rev. 3.6
Page 3 of62
Issue Date: August 23,2011

1 Executive Summary
Business 0 evelopment (BO) has requested th at Business Oevelopme nt Engineering
(BOE) Hydraulic Oesig n Group prepare a Hy draulic Design Proposal for the En bridge
Gateway Pi pelines Proj ect (the Project). The Project will consist of a crude oil pip eline
system to transport oil f rom the Bruderheim Terminal, locat ed near Bru derheim, Alberta
to the Kitimat Terminal located near Kitimat, British Colombia. The Project also includes
a condensa te pipeline system to unload cond ensate (Oilu ent) from ship at the K itimat
Terminal and transport it to the Bruderheim Terminal for distribution to markets in
Alberta.
The proposed system consists of:
Crude Oil Pipeline
From Bruderheim Terminal to Kitimat Terminal - 731.274 miles (1 176.869 km) of

NPS 36, X70 grade pipe with an average wall thickness of 0.665"
Total Pump Facilities Required at Phase I (525 kbpd ann ual) - 7 stat ions, 28 x
5,750 hp pump and motor units, 7 x 6,000 hp VFOs
Total Pump Facil ities Required at Phase IV (850 kbpd annual) -1 2 stations, 80 x
5,750 hp pump and motor units , 12 x 6,000 hp VFDs
38C maximum inlet temperature

Condensate Pipeline
From Kitimat Terminal to Bruderheim Terminal -731 .274 miles (1176.869 km) o f
NPS 20, X70 grade pipe with an average wall thickness of 0.273"
Total Pump Facilities Required at Phase I (193 kbpd ann ual) - 9 stat ions, 18 x
Total Pump Facilities Requ ired at Phase III (275 kbpd annual) - 15 stations, 31 x
This report also contain s preliminary design information for future exp ansion phases.
Northern Gateway notes that the se expansion facilities are not part of the applied for
Project; the information provided has been
primarily developed from a hydraulics
perspective and to assist in syste m design and pipe wall thickne ss selection. Further
work would be done during detailed eng ineering to finalize th e hydraulic design and the
locations of any potential future pump stations. Any futu
re expansion scenario and
be the subject of a future
associated facilities beyond the applied for Project would
design review and optimization.
The following report pro vides the a ssumptions and inputs, as well as t he details of the
hydraulic studies for the proposed design.
Note: This is a preliminary DRAFT (v3.6 dated August 23, 20 II) and has been issued for information only. It has not undergone a rigorous
rev iew by internal stakehol der groups.
(A39833)
Doc. No: BDE-QF- 09
Rev. 3.6
Page 4 of62

'&INB
GE
2 Project Background & Scope of Work

2.1 Background
Business Development Engineering (BDE)
Hydraulic Design Group prepared an
unclassified Hydraulic Design Proposal for th e construction of a Greenfield pip eline
system to transport liq uid hydrocarbons between central Alberta and western British
Colombia in Canada. The proposed system consists of:
A Crude Oil Pipeline which will ca rry crude oil from Bruderheim Terminal to
Kitimat Terminal.
A Condensate Pipelin e which will carry condensate (Diluent) from Kitimat

Terminal to Bruderheim Terminal.
The followin g pipeline capacities were identif ied for use in the design of the Crud e Oil
Line:
Phase
I
II
III
IV
Capacity Summary (bpd)

Annual
Operating
(90% of Design)
(95 % of Design)
525,000 554,167 583,333
600,000633,333 666,667
750,000 791,667 833,333
850,000897,222 944,444
Design
The following pipeline capacities were identified for use in the design of the Condensate
Line:
Phase
I
II
III
Capacity Summary (bpd)

Annual
Operating
(90% of Design)
(95 % of Design)
193,000203,722
250,000 263,889
275,000 290,278
Design
214,444
277,778
305,556
Note: the Annual Capacity is the capacity required by the business and is provided by
the Business Development sponsor. Flow rates for all ph ases are co nsidered in wall
thickness design, but only the hydraulic resu Its of Phase I (initia I) and Ultimate are
presented in this report.
Note: This is a preliminary DRAFT (v3.6 dated August 23, 2011) and has been issued for infollllatioll only. It has not undergone a rigorous
(A39833)
Doc. No: BDE-QF- 09
Rev. 3.6

Page 5 of62
Issue Date: August 23,201 1
A significant amount of hydraulics related work has been d one on this project and this
effort should be recognized. Some but not all areas carried out were:
oJ-curve
analysis
Steady State Hydraulics - heavy and light wall thickness designs, station locating
considering electrical infrastructure issues
Preliminary
pump selection
Transient Analysis by Tau Engineering - NPS 30 - 10 st ation parallel an d series

configurations for crude oil and series for condensate line
An attempt to compile this information and updated information in d

carried out as this project was re-initiated.
etail has been
2.1.1 Revision History

August 23, 2011 - Unclassified Hydraulic Design Proposal v3.6 - Issued for Information
- updated and revised for final NEB IR Submission
August 16,2011 - Unclassified Hydraulic Design Proposal v3.3 -Issued for Information
August 10,2011 - Unclassified Hydraulic Design Proposal v3.1 -Issued for Information
- updated with route revision T and updated manufacturer's pump curves
Note: This is a preliminaIY DRAFT (v3.6 dated August 23,2011) and has been issued for infom1ation only. It has not undergone a rigorous
(A39833)
Doc. No: BDE-QF- 09
Rev. 3.6
Page 6 of62

GE
October 20, 2009 - Un classified Hydraulic Design Proposal v2.0 - is sued for internal
stakeholder review
- updated with route revision R
July 22, 2009 - Unclassified Hydraulic Design Proposal v1.1
- updated with operating limits
- updated with thermal study results
April 29, 2009 - Unclassified Hydraulic Design Proposal v1.0

- to be cir culated in t he project
assumptions
team for the purpose
of confirmin g scope a nd
2.2 Scope of Work

2.2.1 Business Development Engineering - Hydraulics Design
The following scope of work has been identified:
2.2.1.1 Task 1: Pipeline, Pump Station and DRA Facilities

BDE Hydraulics will identify the pump and pipeline facilities required to meet the desired
throughputs. Pipeline wall thickne ss, pump station facilit ies, and exp ansion plan s to
meet the required annual capacities have been identified in this proposal.
2.2.1.2 Task 2: Tank and Terminal Facilities
A review will be conducted upon receipt of the

from consultants
tank and ter minal facility design
BDE Hydraulics will provide power requirement for booster pumps. It is assumed
that others will select and size the booster pumps.
2.2.2 Facilities Management

Initial power costs estimation has been performed by Enbridge's Fa cilities Management
Group (FACMAN) base d on the tot al horsepower of the hydraulic design. Operational
feasibility assessments are to be performed by Facilities Management upon completion
of the final hydraulic design.
Note: This is a preliminary DRAFT (v3 .6 dated August 23, 20ll) and has been issued for infonnation only. It has not undergone a rigorous
(A39833)
Doc. No: BDE-QF- 09
Rev. 3.6

Page 7 of62
Issue Date: August 23, 2011
2.2.3 Deliverables
The Business Development Engin eering Hydraulic Desig n group has developed this
Hydraulic Design Proposal which identifies the new facilities required to meet the scope
as defined above. A design review meeting wi th the relevant internal stakeholders will
also be conducted.
2.2.4 Assumptions
2.2.4.1 Model Files
There are no base files for th is project as it is a Greenfield project. The following names
represent the cu rrent hydraulic model files in use:
Crude Oil Line Model File:

Phase I: E28-N00310-REVT-v1A-PH1-Ann
Phase IV: E28-N0031 O-REVT-v2A-U LT-Ann
Condensate Line Base File:

Phase I: E29-N00310-REVT-v1A-PH1-Ann
Phase III: E29-N00310-REVT-v2A-ULT-Ann
2.2.4.2 Pressure Boundary Conditions

Condition
Pressure
psig
Injection Pressure @Bruderheim

Injection Pressure @Kitimat
Station Suction (Minimum)
Terminal Holding (Minimum)
75
75
50
100
2.2.4.3 Allowable Design Limits

Minimum Flow
Minimum Temp
Minimum Velocity
Flow Rate (bpd)

I Maximum Flow
Temperature (0C)
TBD
I Maximum Inlet Temp
Velocity (ttls)
TBD
I Maximum Velocity
TBD
944 kbpd
38C
20 ftIs (stn)
Note: This is a preliminary DRAFT (v3.6 dated August 23,2011) and has been issued for information oniy. It has not undergone a rigorous
(A39833)
Doc. No: BDE-QF- 09
Rev. 3.6
Page 8 of62

Soil Properties
11_
1111-
11Note: Soil properties are based on the AMEC 2005 report on thermal conditions for the Northern Gateway route. Therefore,
some uncertainties can be expected and a sen sitivity analysis has been conducted around these soil properties. According
to the comments of an industry recognized ex pert in the field of pipe line heat tra nsfer modeling, it is recommended that
additional soil sample to be taken during the detailed engineering phase of the project.
Note: This is a preliminary DRAFT (v3.6 dated August 23, 2011) and has been issued for information only. It has not undergone a rigorous review by intemal stakeholder groups.
(A39833)
Doc. No: BDE-QF- 09
Rev. 3.6

Page 9 of62
NBRIDGE
2.2.4.5 Fluid Properties

Fluid Properties
Fluid
Dilbit
Identifier
T1
Viscosity @ T1
kg/m3
C
11.9
17.5
cSt
350.0
350.0
829.2
4.0
9.7
731.0
7.5
1.24
34.2
OX193 .0
HVB.Q3B 35.3
Light Oil
TVP@
T1
kPa
Density @ 15C
21E
Diluent 7 )E
20.9
TVP@
T2
kPa
RVP
36.1
64.3
6.2
31.7
1.07
56.9
80.6
T2
Viscosity @ T2
C
21.2
26.8
cSt
177.1
18.3
21.0
177.1
kPa
Note: Single product was assumed in this proposed desig

n. There are possibilities of shipping multiple products in the
Northern Gateway Delivery System. The OX1 is used in the model t 0 determine the system design requirements of the oil
pipeline. HVB.Q3B is the diluted bitumen blended to a summer reference temperature. This fluid specification will be used in
model runs to determin e the worst case (summer) te mperature profile only. The 21 E is light crude and will be used to
generate the worst case scenario in the operating limits study.
2.2.4.6 Fluid Injection Temperatures

Injection Temperature
I
I
Pipeline
Injection
Location
Flow Rate
kbpd
Q1
Q2
OF
OF
50
50
9.8
9.8
Q3
Q4
DC
Annual
Average
DF
DC
53
53
OF
C
11.5 0
11.5 ( 0
OF
C
21.1 3
15.6 3
11.5
11.5
531 .5
571, .9
Crude Oil line

Crude Oil line
Bruderheim
Bruderheim
583
944
Condensate line
Kitimat
214
40
4.4
45
7.27D
21.1
50
9.8
487.3
Condensate line
Kitimat
306
40
4.4
45
7.27D
21.1
50
9.8
487.3
Note: As suggested by Facilities Management. For the maximum in-line temperature studies, a summer injection temperature
of 38.0C (1 OOA OF) was used as decided by the project team.
Note: This is a preliminary DRAFT (v3.6 dated August 23, 2011) and has been issued for information only. It has not undergone a rigorous review by internal stakeholder groups.
(A39833)
Doc. No: BDE-QF- 09
Rev. 3.6
Page 10 of62

2.2.4.7
Note: This is a preliminary DRAFT (v3 .6 dated August 23, 2011) and has been issued for inf ormation only. It has not undergone a rigorous review by internal stakeholder groups.
(A39833)
Doc. No: BDE-QF- 09
Rev. 3.6
Page 11 of62
Hydraulic Design ProposalMainline

2.2.5 Scope Not Included

The following scope has not been considered a s part of the baseline estimates for cost
and schedule in this proposal:
o
Tankage requirement at injection and delivery locations

Terminal facilities
Note: This is a preliminruy DRAFT (v3 .6 dated August 23,2011) and has been issued for infoTl1lation only. It has not undergone a rigorous
(A39833)
Doc. No: BDE-QF- 09
Rev. 3.6
Page 12 of62

IDGE
3 Hydraulic Design
The followin g sectio ns describe th e detailed pipeline and related facilities require d to
achieve the desired th roughput for the pipelines describ ed above in Section 2.1 :
Background.
For design purposes, the following capacity definitions are required:
Design Capacity - Maximum theoretical capacity of the pipeline assuming ideal

operating conditions, which mayor may not be achievable in actual operation.
Operating Capacity - Sustainable average capacity re suIting from ta king into

account un -planned e vents such as un- scheduled maintenance, operating
problems, leaks, varia tions from forecast, an d schedulin g proble ms (95% 0 f
Design Capacity).
Annual Average Capacity - Sustainable average capacity on an annu al basis

taking into account planned eve nts such a s schedu led maintenance and
construction (90% of Design Capacity).
The following design philosophy represents Enbridge's typical appr oach for pipeline
design. Thermal effects can playa large role in determining the achievable capacity of a
pipeline, especially in heavy crud e lines where frictional heating ca n contribute to a
significant increase of in-line crude temperat ures. With a n increase in temperatu res
there is a decrease in fluid visco sity resultin g in lower pressure dr ops and highe r
account when
predicted capacities.
Therefore, these effect s must be taken into
completing a hydraulic design.
Enbridge's design philo sophy invol ves two steps. The first step involves solving an
energy balance where the frictional heating generated by the annual average capa city,
and the flu id heat tran sferred to th e soil durin g annual average conditions, deter mines
the resulting in-line fluid temperature profile.
don
Secondly, the temperature profile created at the annual average capacity is force
the pressure drop calculations at t he design rates, resulting in a conservative pressure
drop calculation at the design capacity due to the realistic th ermal profile created at t he
annual average capacit y. Impleme nting this philosophy reduces the possibility of over
estimating the design capacity of the pipeline.
For the detailed ste ady state hydraulic design r
temperatures, and power) please refer to Appendix E.
esults ( capacity, pressures,
Note: This is a preliminruy DRAFT (v3.6 dated August 23, 20 II) and has been issued for infonnation only. It has not undergone a rigorous
(A39833)
Doc. No: BDE-QF- 09
Rev. 3.6

Page 13 of62
3.1 Pipeline Facilities

3.1.1 JCurves and Diameter Selection
BDE Hydraulics conducted the J-Curve and diameter selection study for the oil line . The
diameter 36" was selected for this pipeline design based 0 n the econo mic results as
shown in the following figure.
Normalized Cost of Service
1.00
0.90
0.80
0.70
0.60
0.50
"
'" .., ~.
0.40
'~ ~
------
0.30
, ..
::----..
.;~
-- -------
~
--+-NPS 24-A
_____ NPS 30-8
NPS 36-C
- ---t
~--~~--~
c.:.
NPS42-D
"
0.20
0.10
0.00
200,000
300,000
400,000
500,000
600,000
700,000
800,000
900,000
1,000,000 1,100 ,000
bblld
BDE Hydraulics conducted the J-Curve and diam eter selection study for the conden sate
line. The d iameter 20" was select ed for th is pipeline design based 0 n the econo mic
results as shown in the following figure.
Normalized Cost of Service
1.00
0.90
0.80
'" ~
0.70
0.60
0.50
0.40
~
~
~
-----u::
--+- NPS 16-A
......
":---
____ NPS 20-8

NPS 24-C
0.30
:.~
---it-
NPS 30-D
0.20
0.10
0.00
100,000
125,000
150,000
175,000
200,000
225,000
250,000
275,000
300,000
325,000
bbl/d
Note: Th is is a preliminary DRAFT (v3.6 dated August 23,201 1) and has been issued for infonnation only. It has not undergone a rigorous
(A39833)
Doc. No: BDE-QF- 09
Rev. 3.6

Page 14 of62
3.1.2 Line Description

3.1.2.1 Crude Oil Pipeline
Outer Diameter - 36 inches
FromlTo - From Bruderheim Station to Kitimat Terminal
(S
Length - 731.274 miles (1176.869 km)
Steel Grade - X70
13
Approximate Steel Tonnage - 484,735 tons (imperial)
Pipe
Segment
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
Steel Tonnage
From
To
Length
Proposed Wall
KP
KP
km
in
psig
kPag
Tons (Imperial)
24.551
231.522
286.769
295.500
324.500
331.200
347.150
361.850
364.249
373.849
387.749
418.999
427.001
493.499
496.149
502.149
522.599
564.498
570.099
586.348
594.348
602.498
605.149
612.899
619.948
635.998
642.249
647.399
681.499
687.549
712.349
725.098
739.299
779.199
809.548
836.798
842.899
24.551
206.971
55.247
8.731
29.000
6.700
15.950
14.700
2.400
9.600
13.900
31.250
8.002
66.498
2.651
6.000
20.450
41.899
5.601
16.250
8.000
8.150
2.651
7.751
7.049
16.050
6.251
5.150
34.100
6.050
24.800
12.749
14.201
39.900
30.349
27.249
6.101
0.781
0.719
0.656
0.719
0.656
0.625
0.656
0.625
0.656
0.625
0.656
0.719
0.781
0.719
0.781
0.719
0.656
0.563
0.594
0.625
0.656
0.719
0.656
0.594
0.563
0.469
0.594
0.656
0.719
0.625
0.656
0.719
0.656
0.719
0.656
0.719
0.625
2,430
2,237
2,041
2,237
2,041
1,944
2,041
1,944
2,041
1,944
2,041
2,237
2,430
2,237
2,430
2,237
2,041
1,752
1,848
1,944
2,041
2,237
2,041
1,848
1,752
1,459
1,848
2,041
2,237
1,944
2,041
2,237
2,041
2,237
2,041
2,237
1,944
16,753
15,423
14,071
15,423
14,071
13,406
14,071
13,406
14,071
13,406
14,071
15,423
16,753
15,423
16,753
15,423
14,071
12,077
12,742
13,406
14,071
15,423
14,071
12,742
12,077
10,OGO
12,742
14,071
15,423
13,406
14,071
15,423
14,071
15,423
14,071
15,423
13,406
11,831
91,983
22,442
3,880
11,780
2,595
6,479
5,694
975
3,718
5,646
13,888
3,856
29,553
1,277
2,666
8,307
14,645
2,064
6,294
3,250
3,622
1,077
2,856
2,464
4,686
2,303
2,092
15,155
2,343
10,074
5,666
5,768
17,733
12,328
12,110
2,363
0.000
24.551
231.522
286.769
295.500
324.500
331.200
347.150
361.850
364.249
373.849
387.749
418.999
427.001
493.499
496.149
502.149
522.599
564.498
570.099
586.348
594.348
602.498
605.149
612.899
619.948
635.998
642.249
647.399 .
681.499
687.549
712.349
725.098
739.299
779.199
809.548
836.798
MOP
Note: This is a preliminary DRAFT (v3.6 dated August 23, 2011 ) and has been issued for infonnation only. It has not undergone a rigorous
(A39833)
Doc. No: BDE-QF- 09
Rev. 3.6

Page 15 of62
ENBRIDGE
Pipe
Segment
From
To
length
Proposed Wall
KP
KP
in
psig
kPag
Ton s (Imperial)
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
842.899
847.149
851.148
854.198
865.298
869.899
877.099
886.749
889.848
892.200
901.748
917.598
924.348
927.148
928.849
933.897
935.248
936.299
939.849
946.248
950.899
954.499
959.948
972.848
976.197
981.449
988.849
998.698
1005.599
1014.498
1029.000
1031.647
1043.449
1054.848
1063.648
1071.398
1087.405
1089.598
1094.347
1170.048
847.149
851.148
854.198
865.298
869.899
877.099
886.749
889.848
892.200
901.748
917.598
924.348
927.148
928.849
933.897
935.248
936.299
939.849
946.248
950.899
954.499
959.948
972.848
976.197
981.449
988.849
998.698
1005.599
1014.498
1029.000
1031.647
1043.449
1054.848
1063.648
107l.398
1087.405
1089.598
1094.347
1170.048
1176.871
km
4.250
3.999
3.050
11.100
4. 601
7.200
9.650
3.100
2.352
9.548
15.850
6.750
2.800
1.701
5.049
1.350
1.051
3.550
6.399
4.651
3.600
5.449
12.900
3.349
5.251
7.400
9.849
6.901
8.900
14.502
2.647
11.801
11.399
8.800
7.751
16.007
2.193
4.749
75.700
6.824
0.594
0.500
0.563
0.625
0.656
0.625
0.563
0.625
0.594
0.563
0.500
0.563
0.656
0.719
0.625
0.594
0.594
0.563
0.500
0.594
0.563
0.469
0.406
0.469
0.500
0.594
0.563
0.656
0.594
0.625
0.563
0.625
0.563
0.594
0.563
0.594
0.656
0.719
0.781
0.781
1,848
1,556
1,752
1,944
2,041
1,944
1,752
1,944
1,848
1,752
1,556
1,752
2,041
2,237
1,944
1,848
1,848
1,752
1,556
1,848
1,752
1,459
1,263
1,459
1,556
1,848
1,752
2,041
1,848
1,944
1,752
1,944
1,752
1,848
1,752
1,848
2,041
2,237
2,430
2,430
12,742
10,725
12,077
13,406
14,071
13,406
12,077
13,406
12,742
12,077
10,725
12,077
14,071
15,423
13,406
12,742
12,742
12,077
10,725
12,742
12,077
10,060
8,709
10,060
10,725
12,742
12,077
14,071
12,742
13,406
12,077
13,406
12,077
12,742
12,077
12,742
14,071
15,423
16,753
16,753
1,566
1,244
1,066
4,299
1,869
2,789
3,373
1,201
867
3,337
4,929
2,359
1,138
756
1,956
498
387
1,241
1,990
1,714
1,258
1,591
3,266
978
1,633
2,727
3,443
2,803
3,279
5,617
925
4,571
3,984
3,242
2,709
5,898
891
2,111
36,480
3,288
MOP
Steel Tonnage
Note: SM YS MAOP i s the Maximum Allowable 0 perating Pres sure based on t he prel iminary desi gned wall
thickness and the Barlow Equation. No considerations for actual planned hydro-test pressW"es, which may be lower,
are included.
Note: This is a preliminary DRAFT (v3.6 dated August 23,2011) and has been issued for infol1nation on ly. It has not undergone a rigorous
rev iew by internal stakeholder groups.
(A39833)
Doc. No: BDE-QF- 09
Rev. 3.6
01

Page 16 of62
ENS IDGE
3.1.2.2 Condensate Pipeline
Outer Diameter - 20 inches
FromlTo - Kitimat Terminal to Bruderheim Terminal
Length - 731.274 miles (1176.869 km)
Steel Grade - X70
Approximate Steel Tonnage - 111,053 tons (imperial)
Pipe
Segment
From
To
length
Proposed Wall
KP
KP
km
in
psig
kPag
Tons (Imperial)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
0.000
47.500
92.149
347.719
503.725
667.949
885.677
969.212
1066.590
1126.541
47.500
92.149
347.719
503.725
667.949
885.677
969.212
1066.590
1126.541
1176.871
47.500
44.649
255.570
156.006
164.224
217.728
83.535
97.378
59.951
50.331
0.297
0.312
0.250
0.297
0.250
0.297
0.250
0.297
0.250
0.250
1,663
1,747
1,400
1,663
1,400
1,663
1,400
1,663
1,400
1,400
11,467
12,047
9,653
11,467
9,653
11,467
9,653
11,467
9,653
9,653
4,870
4,805
22,108
15,994
14,206
22,322
7,226
9,983
5,186
4,354
MOP
Steel Tonnage
Note: This is a preliminary DRAFT (v3.6 dated August 23, 2011) and has been issued for infornlation on ly. It has not undergone a rigorous
(A39833)
Doc. No: BDE-QF- 09
Rev. 3.6
Page 17 of62

ENBRIDGE
3.2 Pump Station Facilities

BDE Hydra ulics h as pr oposed a pump selection and pu mp plan for each of th e flow
stages with the appropriate number of pumps, pump/motor sizes, and minimum required
VFD sizes. The pump plans for th e future flo w phases h ave not und ergone extensive
reviews with Engineering Services or the pum p manufacturer. Therefore, BDE Hydraulics
recommends a detailed review of the proposed future pump plans at the appropriate time
during detailed engineering.
3.2.1 Station Locations

3.2.1.1 Crude Oil Pump Stations
The Gateway Delivery System crude oil pipeline will start at Phase I with seven (7) pump
stations, and will expand to encompass twelve (12) pump stations in total at Phase IV.
The proposed station locations for the oil pipeline are summarized in the table below:
Station
(HAINAGE (m)
(HAINAGE (km)
ELEVATION (m)
UTME
UTMN
ZONE
Bruderheim
0.0
98,000.0
203,267.1
286,808.6
400,733.8
506,632.2
600,906.7
719,650.7
828,401.1
929,347.6
1,006,033.1
1,129,293.4
1,176,870.7
0.0
98.0
203.3
286.8
400.7
506.6
600.9
719.7
828.4
929.3
1006.0
1129.3
1176.9
623.0
713.0
753.8
860.5
784.0
843.0
845.3
715.9
720.0
847.1
680.9
211.0
158.0
364,279
659,786
579,695
502,839
410,493
319,684
615,383
519,557
416,897
321,593
640,322
530,634
518,460
5,964,720
5,969,024
6,005,207
6,027,042
6,065,773
6,086,216
6,074,335
6,040,283
6,026,782
6,015,353
6,008,003
6,014,828
5,977,762
12
11
11
11
11
11
10
10
10
10
9
9
9
Majeau
Whitecourt
Fox Creek
Smoky River
Elmworth
Tumbler Ridge
Bear Lake
Fort St. James
Burns Lake
Houston
Clearwater
Kitimat Te rmi nal
Note: This is a preliminary DRAFT (v3.6 dated August 23, 2011) and has been issued for infonnation only. It has not undergone a rigorous
(A39833)
Doc. No: BDE-QF- 09
Rev. 3.6
Page 18 of62

GE
3.2.1.2 Condensate Pump Stations

The Gateway Delivery System con densate pip eline will start at Phase I with nin e (9)
pump stations, and will expand to encompass fifteen (15) stations in total at Phase III.
The proposed station locations for the condensate pipeline are summarized in the table
below:
Station
CHAINAGE (m)
CHAINAGE (km)
ELEVATION (m)
Kitimat Terminal
0.0
47,577.3
92,149.0
170,837.6
247,523.1
293,249.0
348,469.6
457,220.0
503,723.0
575,964.0
670,238.5
776,136.9
890,062.1
973,603.6
1,078,870.0
1,176,870.7
0.000
47.577
92.149
170.838
247.523
293.249
348.470
457.220
503.723
575.964
670.239
776.137
890.062
973.604
1078.870
1176.871
158.0
211.0
Clearwater
Clore
Houston
Burns Lake
Future Station 1
Fort St. James
Bear Lake
Future Station 2
Tumbler Ridge
Elmworth
Smoky River
Fox Creek
Whitecourt
Majeau
Bruderheim
TBD
680.9
847.1
TBD
720.0
715.9
UTME UTMN
ZONE
518,460 5,977,762
9
530,634 6,014,828
9
TBD
TBD
640,322 6,008,003
321,593 6,015,353
TBD
TBD
416,897 6,026,782
519,557 6,040,283
TBD
9
10
TBD
10
10
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
845.3
843.0
784.0
860.5
753.8
713.0
623.0
615,383
319,684
410,493
502,839
579,695
659,786
364,279
6,074,335
6,086,216
6,065,773
6,027,042
6,005,207
5,969,024
5,964,720
10
11
11
11
11
11
12
Note: This is a preliminary DRAFT (v3.6 dated August 23, 20 II) and has been issued for information only. It has not undergone a rigorous
(A39833)
Doc. No: BDE-QF- 09
Rev. 3.6

Page 19 of 62
3.2.2 Pump Plan

Phase I - Appl ication 525,000 bpd
Station
Brake Horsepower
@ Design Rate
bh_
-
Pump
r--"
-
Typ~
Pump
Speed
I
I
Note: This is a preliminary DRAFT (v3.6 dated August 23,2011) and has been issued for infomlation only. It has not undergone a rigorous review by intemal stakeholder groups.
Minimum
VFD
(A39833)
Doc. No: BDE-QF- 09
Rev. 3.6

Page 20 of62
Phase IV - Ultimate 850,000 bpd
Brake Horsepower
@ Design Rate
Station
_I
bhp
Pump Type
-I
Note: This is a preliminary DRAFT (v3.6 dated August 23,2011) and has been issued for information only. It has not undergone a rigorous review by internal stakeholder groups.
Minimum
VFD
(A39833)
Doc. No: BDE-QF- 09
Rev. 3.6
Page 21 of62


Phase I - Application 193,000 bpd
Station
Brake Horsepower
@ Design Rate
---
Pump
Speed
bh
---
Note: This is a preliminary DRAFT (v3 .6 dated August 23, 2011) and has been issued for information only. It has not undergone a rigorous review by internal stakeholder groups.
Minimum
VFD
(A39833)
Doc. No: BDE-QF- 09
Rev. 3.6

Page 22 of62
Phase III - Ultimate 275,000 bpd
Minimum
VFD
Station
- I
---
-
(A39833)
Doc. No: BDE-QF- 09
Rev. 3.6
Page 23 of62

3.2.3 Power
3.2.3.1 Crude Oil Pump Stations
The followin g table pro vides a su mmary of the pressure and power requirements of the
capacity of 583 kbpd and the ultimate design capacity of 944 kbpd.
oil pipeline at the init ial design
Note: This is a preliminary DRAFT (v3.6 dated August 23,2011) and has been issued for information only. It has not undergone a rigorous review by intemal stakeholder groups.
(A39833)
Doc. No: BDE-QF- 09
Rev. 3.6
Page 24 of62
Hydraulic Design Proposal

Mainline
Conf igurat ion Name:E28-N003 10-REVT-v1A-PH 1-Ann
PH 204: Hydraulic Horsepower Report

Page 31 of 38
C:lse N:lme:525_TA_EA_FC
Rate
Station
PUnlP
BR
rm'\ 3/dav)
02745
OfoTime
SIn
%Time
PumD}
100.00
Hold
Pres
75.00
PR E SSUR E {P S I)
Case
Diso
RMO
Pres
Pres
P res
Pres
2160.09
2 160.00
Suet
75.00
Peak
BHP
Peak
HHP
AVij
0.758
4973
38 26
3826
3826
3826
3826
27360
1
27359
2493
4973
4973
4973
4973
4973
20745
20744
16 12
3826
3826
3826
3826
3826
0.647
0.769
0.769
0.769
0.769
0.769
' 074 .63 TOt31:

Throttle:
Diff;=O.OO Useful:
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.000
140.2 1 Total:
Throttle:
Oiff;= ' 912.44 Useful:
24453
0
24453
4694
4939
4 939
4939
4 939
16094
0
18004
3649
3836
3836
3836
3836
965.43 Total:
Throttle:
Diff=O.OO Useful:
0
0
0
0
41.25 Total:
Throttle:
Oiff;= '923.79 Usefu l:
0.09 Total:
Th rottle:
Diff= 2085.0g Useful:
BR l 5750
BR~2-5750
BR-3-5750
BR-4-5750
BR-5-5750
BR-6-5750
92743
92743
n743
92743
n743
92745
OL
OL"-5750
WC- I-5750
WC-2-5750
WC-3-5750
WC-4-5750
WC-~ 5750
Fe
92743
92743
FC-I -6750
SR
92743
92743
SR- I -5750
SR2575D
SR-3-6750
SR-4-575o
SR-~575o
EW
EW-I-57S0
TR
TR- I -5750
TR-2-5750
TR-3-5750
BL
BL-I-5750
BL-2-S750
BL-3-6750
FJ
194.96
212.98
0.00
20 19.79
20 19 .78
1131.64
1131.64
1131.64
194.96
21 18.75
2 11 8.75
'071.01
107 1.0 '
'071.0 1
2 12.98
2 12.98
1250.09
1250.0 9
0.000
19281
0.777
1928 1
3Q35
3836
3836
3836
3836
0.778
0.777
0.777
0.777
0.777
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.000
0
0
0 .000
24602
0
24 602
4845
4 939
4939
4 939
4939
191 10
0
19110
1928 1
0 .777
3838
3836
3836
3836
24823
0
24823
5068
4940
4940
4940
4940
1928 1
3935
3836
3836
3836
3836
0.777
0.777
0.777
0.777
0.777
96B.88 Total:
Throttle_:
Diff;=O.OO Useful:
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.000
0
0
0.000
681.57 Total:
Tluottle:
Diff;= 1037.1 1 Useful:
13275
0
13275
10304
0.776
3389
494 3
4 943
10304
0
10304
2634
3835
3835
0
13275
3389
4943
4943
10304
2634
3835
3835
0 .777
0.776
0 .776
14266
0
14266
4444
4911
4911
11174
0
111 74
3486
3844
3844
14266
0
14266
4444
4911
49 11
11174
0 .783
11174
3486
3844
3844
0.784
0.783
0.783
14266
0
14266
4443
49 11
49 11
11174
0
11174
3485
3844
3844
14266
0
14266
4443
4911
49 11
1 11 74
0.783
11174
3486
3344
3844
0 .784
0 .783
0.783
12934
0
12934
3069
4932
4932
10063
0
10063
2387
3838
3838
12934
0
12934
3069
4932
4932
10063
0 .778
10063
2387
3838
3838
0 .778
0 .778
0 .778
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
344.4'
344.41
1438.21
1468.2 1
633.89 Total:
Throttle:
Diff= 11 23_80 UsefuJ:
lCO.CO
100.00
10C.00
100.00
485.4 1
485.4 1
' 610.74
161 0.74
54(f.2e Total:
Th rottle- :
Diff-:: 1125.34 Useful:
FJ- I-6750
FJ-2-5750
FJ -3-5750
9274:>
92743
92745
BU
BU- H i750
BU-2-5750
BU-3-5750
100.00
100.00
' 00.00
92743
92743
~2743
9274 3
100.00
565.27
100.00
100.00
100.00
565.27
1580.45
1580.45
16 12
24823
0
24823
5068
4940
4940
4940
494 0
0. 00
' 00.00
92743
92743
92743
92745
107.35
20745
0
20744
Eft
0
0
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
'00.00
92743
Q2743
92743
92745
1162.26
0.00
92745
194;96
100.00
Q2743
92743
92743
92743
92743
92745
107.35
0.00
0
92745
1162.2e
100.00
100.00
' 00.00
100.00
100.00
~274 J.
92745
1162.26
0.00
100.00
27 360
1
27359
2403
4973
4973
4973
4073
107.35
0.00
0
92745
WC
100.00
100.00
100.00
100. 00
100.00
100.00
92743
pow E R (H PI
Avg
Avg
BHP
HH P
110.55 Tolal:
Throttle:
Diff= 1015 .17 Useful:
13275
3764
%
RP M
75.23
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
0.00
97.80
100.00
100.00
100.00
'00.00
0 .00
99.1 4
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
0.00
85.25
100.00
100.00
95.80
100.00
100.00
95.80
100.00
100.00
82.02
'00 .00
'00.00
Note: This is a preliminary DRAFT (v3.6 dated August 23, 20 11) and has been issued for info rmation only. It has not undergone a rigorous review by internal stakeholder groups.
(A39833)
Doc. No: BDE-QF- 09
Rev. 3.6
Page 25 of62

Mainline
Configuration Name:E28-N0031 O-REVT -v1 A-PH 1-Ann
C;!se N3me:525_TA_EA_FD
P;!ge 32 of 38
PR E SSUREjPSI)
Ilm A 3ldav)
%i~~~~
g2745.
0 .00
Rate
St<ltion
Pump
HU
r;D~~~~
Hold
Suet
RMD
PO"N E R (H P)
Avg
Avg
Pea k
Peak
Avg
Pres
Case
Pres
Disc
Pres
Pres
PrE's
BHP
HHP
BHP
HHP
Eft
RPM
270.57
1137.21
1137.21
113721
0
0
0 .000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o.oon
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 .000
0
0
0 .000
0
H3Q2
len
0
O.OOD
- l!592
0
0 .000
682.13 Tat']l:
Throttle:
Diff=O.OO Usoful:
H lJ-1-5750
0
Q2745
OW
0.00
0.00
270.57
641.01
641.01
64 1.01
1781.47
TOI.lI:
Th:rottle:
0
0
0
Diff=O.OO Useful:
OWl575<1
KM
Q2745
KM- l
KM
0
(Termi:nrJIl
0.00
270.57
0.00
270.57
0.00
270.57
0
0
1Da.OO 99999832.00 Tot-a!:

Throttle :
[)iff: O.O~ USEfu l:
0
16P2
1692
0
i 6"2
1692
0
270.57
Note: This is a preliminruy DRAFT (v3.6 dated August 23,2011) ruld has been issued for information only. It has not undergone a rigorous review by internal stakeholder groups.
0 .00
o.on
0.00
(A39833)
Doc. No: BDE-QF- 09
Rev. 3.6
Page 26 of 62

Mainline
GE
Configuration Name:E28-N00310-REVT-v2A-UL T-Ann
Case Name:850_TA_EA_FD
Page 33 of 41
P R E S SUR E (P S I)
Rate
Station
Pump
BR
I(m '3Iday)
150157
%Time
%Time
(St n)
(P ump)
100.00
POW ER(H P)
Hold
Suet
Case
Disc
RMD
Avg
Avg
Pea k
Pres
Pres
Pres
Pres
Pres
BHP
HHP
BHP
HHP
75.00
75.00
2 145.03
2 145.03
42317
33389
0
33389
42317
0
42317
33389
2918
2 192
4924
4 924
29 18
4924
4924
3899
3S99
3899
3899
3899
3899
3899
3899
41408
0
4 1408
2877
48 18
46 18
4B16
48 18
4616
481 6
48 18
48 16
33744
0
33744
2240
3937
3937
3937
3937
3937
3937
3937
3937
4 1406
0
4 1406
2877
4818
4816
4B16
4816
48 16
4816
4B 16
4B1 6
33744
3937
3937
3937
3937
3937
3937
3937
3937
0.779
0.818
0. B1B
0.B1B
0.8 18
0.81 B
0.8 18
0.81 8
0.81 B
3 158B
0
31588
3112
4745
4745
4745
4745
4745
4745
26236
0
28238
2514
3953
3953
3953
3953
3953
3953
31588
0
31588
3112
4745
4745
4745
4745
4745
4745
26236
0.83 1
26236
2514
3953
3953
3953
3953
3953
3953
0.B08
0.833
0.833
0.833
0.833
0.833
0.833
37684
0
37684
4706
4711
471 '
4711
47 11
47 11
47 11
4711
31668
0
31668
3954
3959
3959
3959
3959
3959
3959
3959
37684
0
37684
4706
47 11
47 11
47 11
4711
47 11
47 11
4711
3 1868
0.840
3 1868
3954
3959
3959
3959
3959
3959
3959
3959
0.840
0.840
0.840
0.840
0.840
0.840
0.840
0.840
27725
0
32B76
0
32B76
4696
4696
4896
4696
4696
4698
4696
27725
0.843
14.97 To ta l:
Throttle:
BR- 1-5750
BR-2-!l750
BR-3-!l750
BR-4-5750
BR-5-5750
BR-6-!l750
BR-7-5750
BR-8-5750
BR-9-5750
Ol
150 154
150154
150 154
150 154
150 154
150 154
150 154
150 154
150 154
150 157
Diff= 2070.03 Useful:
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
4 924
4924
4924
4924
4924
6006
50.01t
'2 152.00
2152.00
8.00 Total:
Throttle:
.I~
Ol-I -5750
Ol-2-5750
Ol-:l-5750
OL-4-5750
OL-5-5750
OL-6-5750
OL-7-5750
OL-8-5750
OL-rl-5750
WC
Oiff= 2091.94 Useful:

150154
150154
150154
150154
150154
150 154
150154
150 154
150154
150 157
100.00
'100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
- ..
g9.65
100.00
99.65
1726.27
.. 1726.27
433.73 Total:
Throttle:
WC-I -5750
WC-2-!i750
WC-3-5750
'lVC-4-5750
'lVC-!l-!l750
'lVC.(l-!l750
WC-7-5750
FC
150157
FC- I-5750
FC-2-5750
FC-:l-5750
FC-4-5750
FC-5-5750
FC- 6-5750
FC-7-5750
FC' B-5750
SR
150 154
150 154
150 154
150 154
150 154
150 154
150 154
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
1501 54
150154
150 154
150 154
150154
150154
150 154
150154
150157
116.33
116.33
2086.09
2086.09
8.91 Total:
Throttle:
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
253.33
253.33
1978.45
1978045
181.55 Total:
ThrotUe:
Diff=: 1725. 12 Useful:
SR- 1-5750
SR-2-5750
SR-3-5750
S R-4-5750
SR-5-!l750
SR-1l-5750
SR-7-5750
EW
150 154
150 154
150 154
150154
150 154
150 154
150 154
150157
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
113.44
113.44
1838.40
1838.40
194.Bo To!.>l:
Throttle;

EW- I-5750
EW-2-5750
EW-3-575o
EW-4-5750
EW-5'5750
EW-1l-5750
_~~~EW-7-5L5.0
150 154
150154
150 154
150 154
150 154
150 154
15_0154
100.0 0
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
1.0_0.,0.0_ .
0
42317
32876
0
32876
4898
4696
4696
4696
4696
4696
4696
27725
3geO
3960
3960
3960
3980
3980
3960
4924
4n4
4924
4924
4924
4924
4924
Peak
Avg
0.789
2 1"2
3899
3899
3899
3899
3899
3899
3899
3899
0.751
0.792
0.792
0.792
0.792
0.792
0.792
0.792
0.792
83.05
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
0.815
33744
2240
83.19
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
85.79
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
99.96
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.0 0
100.00
100.00
27725
0.843
0.843
0.543
0.843
0.843
0.843
0.843
32774
27726
0
32774
27726
3953
4672
3953
4883
3962
3962
- '3962
4683
3962
3962
4683
3962
3g62
4683
3982
3982
4683
3982
46_8_3~~3_9_6_2_ _
46~_3~_3_96 2
0.846
277 26
0
RPM
33389
3960
3960
3980
3960
3980
3960
3960
-32774
0
32774
4672
4683
4683
4683
4683
4683
Eft
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
27726
0.846
0.846
0.846
-0.846
0.848
0.846
99.92
100,00
100.00
100:00
100.00
100.00
~_0._8.'1ll~~_
1 0_0"OO_
Note: This is a preliminary DRAFT (v3 .6 dated August 23, 201 1) and has been issued for information only. It has not undergone a rigorous review by internal stakeholder groups.
(A39833)
Doc. No: BDE-QF- 09
Rev. 3.6
Page 27 of62

Mainline
Configuration Name:E28-N00310-REVT-v2A-ULT-Ann
PH 20 4: Hydrau lic Horsepower Repo rt
Case Name:850_TA_EA_FD
Page 34 of 41
P RE S SUR E (P S I)
Station
Pump
TR
Rat.
m A 3 ld.y}
%Time
%Time
Hold
Suet
Case
(Stn)
(Pump)
Pres
Pres
Pres
Disc
Pres
150 157
100.00
3 19.33
3 19.33
191 0.33
191 0.33
POWER(HP}
Avg
A vg
Pea k
BHP
HHP
BHP
RMD
Pres
5 1.99 Total:
Throttle:
Diff= 159 1.00 Useful:

TR- I-5750
TR-2-5750
TR-3-5750
TR-4-5750
TR-5-5750
TR-6-5750
TR-7-5750
150 154
150 154
150 154
150 154
150154
150 154
150 154
150157
BL
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
191.38
1913.41
1913.41
226.33 Total:
Th rottle:

BL-I-S750
BL-2-5750
BL-3-5750
BL-4-5750
BL-5-5750
BL-6-5750
BL-7-5750
150154
150154
150154
150154
150154
150154
1501'54
150 157
FJ
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
186. 10
186. 10
2 160.07
2 160. 00
-0.07 Total:
Throttle:

150 154
150 154
150 154
150154
150 154
150 154
150154
150 154
FJ- I-5750
FJ-2-5750
FJ -3-5750
FJ -4-5750
FJ -5-5750
FJ--6575<Q
FJ-7-575iJ
FJ-8-5750
BU
150157
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
453.7 1
453.71
1687.56
18B7.56
38.30 Total:
Throttle:

BU-I -575<Q
BU-2-5750
BU-3-5750
BU-4-5750
BU-5-6750
HLJ
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
150154
150154
150154
150154
150154
150 157
100.00
752.48
752.49
168 1.36
168 1.36
142.25 Tota l:
Throttle:

HU-I-5750
HU-2-5750
HU-3-5750
HU-4-5750
1501 54
150 154
150 154
150 154
150157
CW
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
383.97
383.97
838.37
838.37
1321.63 Total:
Throttle:
Diff= 4 54.41 Useful:

CW-I -5750
CW-2-5750
KM
150154
150154
150 157
100.00
100.00
0.00
148.36
148.36
148.36
100.0099999952.00 Tota l:
Throttle:
Diff= 0.00 Useful:

KM- l
KM
K ennina.l
0.00
Avg
Elf
25797
0.842
25707
2022
3062
3062
3062
3962
3962
3962
0.79 2
0.846
0.846
0.846
0.846
0.846
0.846
32563
0
32563
4606
4 659
4659
4659
4659
4659
4659
27703
0.85 1
27703
39 17
3964
3964
3964
3964
3964
3964
0.85 1
0.85 1
0.85 1
0.85 1
0.85 1
0.85 1
0.85 1
3 1720
0.853
3965
3965
3965
37 167
I
371 65
4645
4645
4845
4645
4645
4645
4645
4645
3 17 19
3964
3965
3965
3965
3965
3965
3965
3965
0.853
0.853
0.853
0.853
0.8 53
0.8 53
0.853
0.853
23229
0
23229
4645
4 645
4645
4645
4645
19825
0
19825
3965
3965
3965
3965
3965
23229
0
23229
4 645
4 645
4645
4 645
4645
19825
0.853
19825
3965
3965
3965
3965
3965
0.853
0.853
0.853
0.853
0.853
17537
0
17537
3594
4847
4647
4647
1494 1
0
14941
3046
3965
3965
3965
17537
0
17537
3594
4647
4647
4647
1494 1
0.852
1494 1
3046
3965
3965
3965
0.847
0.853
0.853
0.853
8580
0
8580
3945
4 634
7329
0
7329
3363
3965
8580
0
8580
3945
4634
7329
0.854
7329
3363
3965
0.853
0.856
0
776
-77 6
0
0
776
-776
0
0.000
-776
0
0.000
30642
0
30642
4681
468 1
468 1
4681
4681
4681
25707
0
25797
2022
3962
3062
3062
3062
3962
3962
30642
0
30642
2552
468 1
4681
4681
4681
4681
4681
32563
0
32563
4606
4650
4 650
4659
4659
4659
4659
27703
0
27703
39 17
3964
3964
3964
3964
3964
3964
37 167
1
37165
4645
4645
4845
4645
4645
4645
4645
4645
3 1720
1
317 19
3964
3965
3965
3065
25 52
191.38
HHP
Pea k
3Q65
%
RPM
80.84
100.00
100.00
100 .00
100.00
100.00
100.00
99.59
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.0 0
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
9 1.53
100. 00
100.00
100.00
94.58
100.00
776
-776
0
148.36
0.00
(A39833)
Doc. No: BDE-QF- 09
Rev. 3.6

Mainline
Page 28 of62
3.2.3.2 Condensate Pump Stations

The followin g table provides a summary of the pressure a nd power requirements of the cond ensate pipeline at the initial
design capacity of 214 kbpd and the ultimate design capacity of 306 kbpd.
Configuration Name:E29-N0031 O-REVT -v1 A-PH 1-Ann
Case Name:193_TA_EA]D
Station
Pump
KM
m"'3/~:~;
'!.I~~n}
34095
100.00
Page 24 of 34
(~J~)
Hold
Pres
75.00
PRE S SUR E (P S I)
Case
Suet
Prl!S
PreS
75.00
590.55
P OWER(H P}
34094
0
340g5
CW
236.95
1682.9a
340g4
34004
34095
NB
435.00
797.34
797.34
0.02 Total:
707.34
470.28 Tot.!!l:
Throttle:
HU
0.00
340115
100.00
435.00
4315.90
1140.25
1146.25
252.75 Total:
Throttle:

HU-l
HU-2
340114
0
34095
BU
100.00
0.00
100.00
507.28
507.28
1180.S0
1180.S9
212. 11 Tot.11:
Throttle:
Oiff= 673.61 Usefu l:
BU- l
BU-2
X,
34094
0
100.00
0.00
341X1!5
(LOD
34095
100.00
XI-I
FJ
69S.69
636.4 1
636.41
636.41
609.31 TOt31:
Throttle:
Diff= 0.00 Useful:
Bl
34094
0
34095
ege.e9
696.69
1387.17
1367.17
240.83 Tot.)l:
100.00
0 .00
100.00
709.84
70Q.84
1416.81
1416.81
246.39 Total:
Throttle:
100.00
0.00
34094
0
34095
IX2
6744
0
6744
2627
4117
5277
0.782
553.47
0.00
Avg
1114.39
1114.39
111 4.39
yJ
RPM
78 ,97
0 .00
5277
2155
3121
0 .820
0.758
64,23
100.00
0.000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 .000
326g
0
326g
3269
0
259 1
0
25g 1
2591
0
3270
0
3270
3270
0
2592
0.793
2592
2592
0
0.793
0 .000
3060
0
3069
3069
0
2457
0
2457
2457
0
3106
0
3106
3 106
0
248 1
0.801
248 1
2481
0
0.801
0.000
0.00
92.06
0.00
89 .74
0.00
0.000
0.000
DifF 706.97 Useful:

BL-I
Bl-2
0.833
0 .000
5277
0
6277
2155
31 2 1
lsaO
0.00
Throttle:
Oiff=: 690.46 Useful:
FJ- l
FJ-2
1880
1880
0
6744
0
6744
2627
4117
1682.98
Diff= 0.00 Useful:

NBl
1880
0
lB80
997.9(} Total:
100.00
100.00
0.00
0.833
2257
0
2257
2257
0
590.55
Throttle:
Diff= 1446.03 UseflJl:
CW-1
CW-2
1880
HHP
a.{)O
23tHIS
Eft
2257
0
2257
2257
0
Avg
BHP
100.00
100.00
HHP
Avg
Pres
Throttle:
KM-2
Puk
RMD

KM'
Peak
BHP
Disc
Pres
2539
0.797
2519
0
3 192
0
31Q2
3192
0
2539
2539
0
0.797
0.000
2579
0
21579
2579
0
3270
0
3270
3270
0
2591
0.793
2591
2591
0
0.793
0.000
316 1
0
31 0 1
31 6 1
0
2519
0
3251
0
3251
3251
0
2~19
285.61 Total:
0.00
9o.a2
0.00
9 1.65
0 .00
0.000
Throttle:
Oiff= 0.00 Useful:
)(2-1
34095
ITR
0.000
0 .00
100.00
553.47
553.47
1224.50
1224.50
148.15 TObl:
Throttle:
TR-1
TR-2
EW
34094
0
34005
10 0.00
0.00
4Q.Q3
0 .00
651.77
6S1.n
651 .77
3055
0
3055
3055
0
2448
0
2448
2448
0
3072
0
3072
3072
0
2459
0.80 1
2459
2450
0
0.S01
0 .000
876.76 Total:
0.00
89.58
0.00
0.000
Throttle:
Oifi: 0.00 Useful:
EW-1
0.00
341XJ5
SR
100.00
0 .000
4 9.{j3
40.g3
1285.78
1285.78
358.22 Tot.!!l:
Throttle:
Dif'f: 1235.85 Useful:
SR.1
SR-2
FC
34004
34094
3409S
100.00 "
100.00
95.S1
0 .00
495.24
495.24
495.24
904 .70 Tot.11:

Throttle:
Diff=: 0.00 Useful:

Fe- ,
0.00
6750
0
5759
1640
4119 '
0
0
0
0
45 11
0
4511
1390
3121
5861
0
5861
1741
4119
4506
0.783
4506
14 74
3121
0.S48
0 .758
0.00
68.02
100.00
0.000
0
0
0 .000
0 .00
(A39833)
Doc. No: BDE-QF- 09
Rev. 3.6

Mainline
Page 29 of62
Configuration Name:E29-N0031 O-REVT -v1A-PH 1-Ann

Case Name: 193_TA_EA_FD
Station
Pump
we
l(m'31~~~
%I~':'n;
340Q5
UHLO[}
(~Tim.
Pump)

P.lge 25 of 34
PRE S SUR E (P S II
Suet
Case
Pres
Hold
Pres
Pre-s
fl5.B l
~5.81
1225.66
POW ER (H P)
Disc.
RMD
Avg
Avg
Pres
Pres
BHP
HHP
1225.66
40(;.34
To~l :
Throttle:
34oij4
340Q4
WC-l
WC-2
34oQ5
OL
100.00
100.00
0.00
41 1 ~
100.13
653.81
653.81
653.81
746. 19 Total:
Thrat1le:
Oiff=O.O~
9il
34095
0.00
4 122
0
';122
1001
3121
Peak
HHP
Avg
'10
Eft
RPM
5305
0
5305
4124
O.n7
4124
1186
41H}
3121
1002
0.845
0 .i58
0.000
100.13
100. 13
100. 13
60.54
100.00
0.000
Useful:
0.00
OL-l
5303
0
5303
1184
Peak
BHP
100.00 00000000.00 Total :
0.00
0.000
Throttle:
Oift=O.O[} Useful:
eRl
BR
0.00
(Termin.l)
0.000
0.00
100.13
(A39833)
Doc. No: BDE-QF- 09
Rev. 3.6
BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERI NG
Hyd ra ulic Design Proposal

Mainli ne
Page 30 of 62
Configuration Name:E29-N0031O-REVT -v2A-UL T-Ann
C3se Name:275_TA_EA_FD
P3ge 24 of 32
pow ER(H
P R E S SU R E (P S I)
Statio n
Pump
l (mA31~!~
%I;;;'i
48581
100.00
Kid
[~nme
Pump)
Pre.
Suet
Pres
Case
Pres
Dis c
RMD
Pres
Pres
75.00
75.00
690.47
690.47
Hold
9 11.53 Total:
Throttle:
Difr-o 6 15.47 Useful:

KM- l
KM-2
48580
0
CW
48581
100.00
0.00
100.00
50.06
50.06
1666.08
1666.08
4 2.92 Toul:
Throttle:
. Dift= 1616.02 Useful:

CW-l
CW-2
48580
48580
4858 1
N8
100 .00
100.00
100.00
510.18
5 10.18
1058. 19
1058.19
2 12.77 Total:
Throttle:
Diff= 548.0 1 Useful:
48580
0
NB- l
NB-2
HI)
48581
100.00
0.00
100.00
48580
48580
HU- l
HUC2
BU
4858 1
237.36
237. 36
1399.09
13911.00
-0.00 Total:
Throttle:
Dift= 1161.73 Useful:
100.00
100.00
100.00
3 11.53
31 1.53
l11B.96
1118.96
275.04 Total:
Throttle:
DifF 807.43 Useful:

4 8 ~80
8 U- l
100.00
0.00
BU-2
Xl
4858 1
100.00
307. 14
307.14
11 14.1IIl
1114.99
118.0 1 T01.1:
Throttle:
Xl -1
X1-2
48580
0
FJ
4858 1
10.0.00
0. 00
100.00
852.50
1585.66
1585.66
49.34 Tot.31:
Throttle:
Diff= 733.0.7 Useful:

FJ- l
FJ-2
485BO
0
Bl
4858 1
100.00
0. 00
100.00
257.39
257.39
1658.08
1658.00
8l-1

48580
48580
Bl -2
-0 .0.8 Total:
Throttle:
I~
X2
4858 1
100.00
100.00
100.00
974.43
1399.0B
974.4 3
1399.00
-0.08 Total:
Throttle:
Diff= 424. 65 Useful:
X2- 1
)(2-2
48580
0
T~
4858 1
100.00.
0.00
100.00
519.00.
519.00
1223,54
1223.54
-TR-l
TR-2
48580
0
EW
485Bl
EW- l
EW-2
SR
48580
48580
48581
14 9.46 Total:
Throttle: _
Difr-0704.53 Usefuf:
100.00
0.00
100.0.0
100.3 1
100.3 1
14 72.7e
1472.76
88.24 Total:
Throttle:
100.00
100.00
100.00
237.72
237.72
1654.09
.1!l54.00
-0.09 Toul:
Throttte:
S R- l
SR-2
SR-3
- Dift= 1416 .36 Useful:

"'l'-''''
4 8580.
48580.
0
100.00
100.00
0:00
Avg
8HP
Avg
HHP
Peak
Peak
8HP
HHP
Avg
Elf
3774
0
3774
3774
0
3 199
0
3 199
3 199
0
3774
0
3774
3774
0
3199
0.848
3199
3199
0
0.848
0.000
9904
0
9904
4951
4952
8400
0
8400
4 199
4200
9904
0
9904
4951
4952
8400
0.848
8400
4199
4200
0.848
0.848
3369
0
3369
3369
0
2848
0
2B48
2648
0
3369
0
3369
3369
0
2B48
0.845
284B
2848
0
0.845
0.000
7 194
0
7 194
2242
4952
606 1
0
606 1
1660
4200
7194
0
7194
224 2
4952
6061
0.842
6061
1660
4200
0.830
0.848
4947
0
4947
4947
0
4 197
0
4 197
4 197
0
4947
0
4947
4947
0
4197
0.848
4950
0
4950
4950
4199
0
4199
4 199
0
4492
0
44 92
4492
0
3Bl0
0
3810
3B l 0
0
8597
0
B596
364 5
495 1
7293
0
7293
3092
4 200.
2639
0
2639
2639
0
2207
4197
4197
0
0.848
0.000
4950
0
4950
4950
0
4 190
0 .848
4199
4190
0
0.B48
0.000
44Q2
3B l 0
0.B48
0
4492
4492
0
3810.
38 10
0
0.848
0.000
8597
0
B596
3645
4951
7293
0.B48
7293
3092
4200
0.B48
0.848
2207
0.836
0
2207
220.7
0
2639
0
2639
2639
0
2207
2207
0
0.B36
0.0.00
43 16
0
4316
43 16
cO
3662
0
3662
3682
0
4316
0
4 316
4316
0
3662
0.848
B444
0
8444
3492
4952
7 157
0
7 157
2956
4200
B455
0
8455
3503
4952
86Q7
0
8696
3744
4952
0
7377
0
7377
3 176
4200
0
c8703
" 0
87 02
375 1
4952
0
852.59
~-~
!""::,,':-,
P)
3662
3662
~-0
%
RPM
89.60
0 .00
99.99
100.00
85.75
0.00
73.73
100.00
99.96
0.00
09.99
0.00
96.09
0.00
88.39
100.0 0
78.21
0 .00
il!O
-,
0.84 B
0.000
7167
0.848
7167
2966
4 200
0.847
0.84B
7382
0.848
7382
3181
4 200
0
0. 848
0.848
0.000
94.5B
0.00
86.92
100.00
89.35
100.00
0 .00
Note: This is a preliminary DRAFT (v3 .6 dated Angust 23 , 2011) and has been issued for information only. It has not undergone a rigorous review by internal stakeholder groups.
(A39833)
Doc. No: BDE-QF- 09
Rev. 3.6
Page 31 of62

Configurati.on Name:E29-N0031 O-REVT -v2A-UL T -Ann
C<lse N<lme:275_TA_EA]D
Station
Pump
rC
FC-l
FC-2
(mA31~~~';
%nrni
48&8 1
1 0~ . 00
48580
48M I
(~J:i
PRE S SUR E (P S II
Case
Pres
pow
Hold
Pres
Suet
Disc
Pres
Pres
18 1.24
181. 24
9:>8. 15
Q38 .15
RMD
Pres
Avg
BHP
456.85- To!.sl:
Throttle:
Oiff= 756.91 Us ..!ul:
100.1l0
0.00
WC
P<lge 25 of 32
I IlO.OO
50.09
50.00
164,Ulll
1648.0!)
- O.O~
TOtal:
Throttle:
Diff= 1597.97 lJse!ul:
we-l
100.00
100.00
485-80
48580
WC-2
OL
4859 1
500.33
100.00
5-DO.3S
1272.3-6
1272.36
122.64
To:~I :
Throtle:
Diff= 772.03 Uselul:
O L-l
O L-Z
10().OO
I}.OO
48580
BR
4858 1
0.01}
100.06
100.06
100.1l6
100.000000[1000.01} Tobl:
Thronle:
Oili: 0.00 Uselut
8R-1
8R-2
BR
0
0
0.00
0.00
(Terminal}
4"39
ER(H P)
Avg
HHP
3934
Peak
BHP
Peak
HHP
AV[J
Elf
RP~I
4639:
0
463S
3934
0.848
453Q
4639
3934
3934
~63 G'
3lJ34
3934
I)
I}
0.848
0.000
9S03
0
9a03
4850
49S3
83 14
0
83 14
41 13
420()
8314
0.848
9803
4ll5D
4953
B3 14
4113
4200
0.848
0.848
4731
4() 13
40 13
0.848
9803
97.34
0.00
(I
4 731
473 1
40 13
4D l 3
473 1
0
473 1
4731
40 13
4013
I}
I}
I}
0.848
D.Q{)O
()
I}
0.000
(}
[}
()
[)
0
0
0
0
()
(}
(}
0
0
0.000
D.1l00
-g9.13
100.00
98.13
0.00
0.00
0.00
100.1l6
3.2.4 Variable Frequency Drive (VFD)

Since both the oil and the diluent pipelines are large diameter pipelin es with relatively large motor sizes, BDE Hydra ulics
recommends the use of a Variable Frequency Drive (VFO) to enhance operability and reduce pressure throttling.
(A39833)
Doc. No: BDE-QF- 09
Rev. 3.6
Page 32 of62

?J
N
RIDGE
3.2.5 Case Pressure Limits

3.2.5.1
Crude Oil Pipeline
For crude oil pipeline pump stations, all the st ation piping will be designed to PN 150
(ANSI 900) class resulting in a case pressure limit of 2160 psig for all pump stations. To
maintain maximum operational flexibility, it is recommended that all the station piping be
hydro-tested to the full ANSI 900 (2160 psig) rating

For condensate pipelin e pump stat ions, Clearwater, Fort St. James, Be ar Lake, Smoky
River, and Whitecourt will be designed to PN 150 (ANSI 900) cia ss resulting in a case
pressure limit of 2160 psig for these 5 stations. All the other stations will be designed to
PN 100 (ANSI 600) class resulting in a case pressure limit of 1440 psig.
(A39833)
Doc. No: BDE-QF- 09
Rev. 3.6
Page 33 of62

3.2.6 Pump Standby

The current Enbridge standby philosophy is to ensure that when the largest unit at a
pump station is out of service, the pipeline can still achieve operating capacity (95 % of
design capacity). A sta ndby analysis was com pleted to en sure the pro posed desig n for
the NGP meets the above criteria. The results are summarized in this section.
Note: This is a preliminalY DRAFT (v3.6 dated August 23, 2011) and has been issued for infollllation only. It has not undergone a rigorous
(A39833)
Doc. No: BDE-QF- 09
Rev. 3.6
Page 34 of62

ENBRIDGE
Note: This is a preliminruy DRAFT (v3.6 dated August 23, 2011) and has been issued for infonnation only. It has not undergone a rigorous
(A39833)
Doc. No: BDE-QF- 09
Rev. 3.6
Page 35 of62

3.3 Operational Limitations and Concerns

3.3.1 Petroleum Quality and Batching
The oil and condensate pipelines were hydraulically designed based on a single product
for each pipeline. During detailed engineerin g, the final hydraulic design for t he oil
pipeline will incorporate the additional lighter oil products anticipated to be transported in
batches, a nd this will re suit in revis ions to the design pressures and wa II th icknesses at
some specific locations along the pipel ine.
3.3.2 Minimum Reynolds Number

The table below summarizes the range of the Reynolds number in any crude oil pipeline
and condensate pipeline at in itial and ultimate flow rates. It can be seen that the flow
regime is fully turbulent in both system at the target flow rates.
Pipeline
Phase
Design Flow Rate (bpd)
Reynold's Number
583,333
4,531 - 5,395
IV
944,444
9,763 - 25,082
214,111
803,725 - 824,213
Oil
Condensate
III 305, 556
1,179,335 - 1,240,192
3.3.3 Maximum Mainline Fluid Velocities

The maxi mum fluid velocity in the crude oil pipel ine is 9.5 ftlsec ba sed on the ultimate
phase targe t design ca pacity of 944,444 bpd. The ma
ximum fluid velocity in the
condensate pipeline is 9 .7 ftlsec based on the ultimate phase target design capacity of
305,556 bpd. These values are within the typical flu id velocities found acceptable on the
Enbridge System.
(A39833)
Doc. No: BDE-QF- 09
Rev. 3.6
Page 36 of62

-etNBRIDGE
3.3.4 Operating Limits

Operating limits were critical due to the significant elevation changes along the route.
Note: This is a preliminary DRAFT (v3.6 dated August 23,2011) and has been issued for information only. It has not undergone a rigorous
(A39833)
Doc. No: BDE-QF- 09
Rev. 3.6
Page 37 of62

Note: This is a preliminary DRAFT (v3.6 dated August 23,2011) and has been issued for infomlation only. It has not undergone a rigorous
(A39833)
Doc. No: BDE-QF- 09
Rev. 3.6
Page 38 of62

Note: This is a preliminary DRAFT (v3.6 dated August 23, 2011) and has been issued for information only. It has not undergone a rigorous
(A39833)
Doc. No: BDE-QF- 09
Rev. 3.6
Page 39 of62

3.4 Pipeline Thermal Analysis
3.4.1 Annual Average Temperature Profile

The followin g profiles contain a summary of the average station in let and outlet in-line
temperature under annual average conditions. These are the thermal conditions used in
the hydraulic design capacity and pressure loss calculations.
Note: This is a preliminruy DRAFT (v3.6 dated August 23,2011) and has been issued for information only. It has not undergone a rigorous
(A39833)
Doc. No: BDE-QF- 09
Rev. 3.6

Page 40 of62
ENBRIDGE

Phase I - Application 525 kbpd Annual
Conflg: E28-SE2109-REVRLF-A/'IEC Case: 583kbpd_DesI(11
Thermal Profile
Profile of temperalJJe vs Milepost
85 .
80 .
75.0
70.0
65 .
60 .
55 .
so .
<15.0
..
<i
ti
Phase IV - Ultimate 850 kbpd Annual

Conflg: E28-SE2109-REVRHF-AMEC Case: 944kbpd_Design
Thermal Profile
Profile of temperature vs Milepost
00.
95.
').0
85 .
80 .
.>
~
ill
:"
"
~
-<""")
Note: This is a preliminary DRAFT (v3 .6 dated August 23,2011) and has been issued for infonnation only. It has not undergone a rigorous
(A39833)
Doc. No: BDE-QF- 09
Rev. 3.6

Page 41 of62

Phase 1- Application 193 kbpd Annual
Conflg: E29-AU1009-DL-REVR ease: 214kbpd_deslgo
Thermal Profile
Profile of temperature vs Milepost
o.
65.0
60.0
55.0
SO.O
'15.0
40.0
35.0
!!
'2
;..;;:
;j
'"
i!i
Phase III - Ultimate 275 kbpd Annual

Config: E29-AU1009-DL-REVR case: 306kbpd_design
Thermal Profile
Profile of temperabJre \IS Milepost
o.
65.0
60.0
55 .0
SO.O
15.0
40.0
35.0
0.0
'2
!l
"
i1;
iii
r1iepost(o*s)
Note: This is a preliminary DRAFT (v3 .6 dated August 23,2011) and has been issued for infon11ation only. It has not undergone a rigorous
(A39833)
Doc. No: BDE-QF- 09
Rev. 3.6

Page 42 of62
3.4.2 Maximum Temperature Analysis
3.4.2.1 Baseline
Phase I - Application 525 kbpd Annual

Conflg: E28-SE2109-REVRLF-38Clnj case: max_temp_Q3
Thermal Profi Ie
Profile of temperalLre vs Milepost
"'.0
~&
!
as.O
00.0
75.0
70.0
$ .0
O.
l"
<>
:t'
iii
!!
r.uepost(mles)
Note: This is a preliminruy DRAFT (v3 .6 dated August 23,2011) and has been issued for infonnation only. It has not undergone a rigorous
(A39833)
Doc. No: BDE-QF- 09
Rev. 3.6

Page 43 of 62
Phase IV - Ultimate 850 kbpd Annual

Config: E28-SE2109-REVRHF-38Cinj Case: maJ,-Temp_Q3
Thermal Profile
Profile of temperabJre vs Milepost
'''.
125.0
120.0
115.0
110.0
IOS.0
100.0
95.0
90.0
65.0
9.6
"
Ii'
'"
'"
:c
"
"
r'li!e~t(miles)
The temperature profile shown above indicates that the maximu m in-line temperatures
between Bruderheim and Kitimat range from between 19.3C (66.8F) and 39.SoC
(103.1F) at the Pha se I flow rate; 38.1 C (100.S0F)
and 40.9C (1 os. rF) at the
ultimate flow rate. These in-line temperatures are well within the desig n limitation of the
pipeline SO.OC (122.0F).
3.4.2.2 Sensitivity Study

There is so me uncertainty in some of the thermal assumptions u sed in determinin g the
baseline thermal profile shown above, specifica lIy soil prop erties (ther mal conduct ivity
and temperature). Th erefore a sensitivity analysis was conducted
around th ese
parameters to determine the range of potential maximum in-line temperatures that could
be seen.
Sensitivity Assumptions:
Summer soil thermal conductivity -lower by 30% from the values in AMEC
report (200S) based on previous project experience.
Summer soil temperatures - 10C (SOF) based on preliminary reCD mmendations

provided by Derick Nixon (2008).
The in-line temperature profiles of the above two sensitivity runs are presented in the
graph below, together with the baseline profile for the purpose of comparison.
Note: This is a preliminaIY DRAFT (v3.6 dated August 23, 20 II) aIld has been issued for information only. It has not undergone a rigorous
(A39833)
Doc. No: BDE-QF- 09
Rev. 3.6

Comp any Confidential
Page 44 of62
~
ENBRIDGE
Dilbit Line Maximum In-line Temperature Sensitivity - Phase IV Fll ow

-
Baselin e
70%Conductivity
50FG round
125 -,--- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ---,- 51.7

LL..
120
48 .9
0.0
<1.1
OJ
...
....
...
<1.1
0.0
<1.1
115
46 .1
:::I
til
<1.1
Co
110
---- ---- -- - -. - - - -- ---- - -- - - - --- - --- - ----- -- -- - - - - -- - - - -------- - - _.- ----.--- - --- - - -- ----------- ----~
43.3
105
40.5
100
37.8
95
35 .0
<1.1
l-
E
:::I
'xtil
U
OJ
-<1.1
...
...
:::I
.....
til
<1.1
Co
90
50
100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 650 700 750
Milepost
The results show that th e maximu m temperatures are arou nd 40.0C (1 04.0F) in most
cases. However, it can get close to 50.0C (122.0F) when the soil co nductivity is 30 %
lower than the AMEC re port values, It is recom mended that an addition al soil sampling
program be conducted at the commencement of detailed engineering.
Note: This is a preliminary DRAFT (v3.6 dated August 23, 2011) and has been issued for information only. It has not undergone a rigorous
:::I
'xtil
~
(A39833)
Doc. No: BDE-QF- 09
Rev. 3.6
Page 45 of62
Issue Date: August 23,20 11

Transient Analysis
A preliminary transient analysis ha s been conducted for both the crude oil pipelin e and
the conden sate pipeline systems
4.1 Crude Oil Pipeline System

Thirty-eight (38) scenarios in tota I were ex ami ned for the oil pipeli ne system at the
ultimate flo w rate. The transient scenarios examined include sudde n and unplanned
pressu re co ntrol valve (peV) closure (95% at intermediate stations, 1 00% at delivery
locations), station suction valve closing, and station lockout.
The transie nt study resulted maxi mum pressure profiles of all scenario s, as well as the
steady-state pressure profile are sho wn in the figure below. I t can be seen that the wall
thickness design is adequate as the maxi mum pressure profile of all scenarios is under
the 110% MOP limit.
Note: This is a preliminary DRAFT (v3.6 dated August 23,2011) and has been issued for infomlation only. It has not undergone a rigorous
(A39833)
Doc. No: BDE-QF- 09
Rev. 3.6

Page 46 of62
NGP Oil Pipeline Maximum Pressure Profile - All Scenarios

- - Min MOP
2800
2400
2000
~.
- - 110% Mill MOP
- - Maximum Pressure
Steady State
- - Wa ll Thickness
2.8
r=n
L--...JA~ R-I-r=-,.,I
I.\
II
n nn
fl
.-,
r1" rf
Ir
L.J
n
L......J
L'I-lt-n'Hl-I~HI
n IF
I Ir
2.4
-1- 1-1--+ 2
:cu
bii 1600 I
'" ~ PJ '. IN\ fI
IV~" H IlfIl--:rI~HIA j
'I,
I rIllU--+-lfIIH h ~ I I
~,----+
1.6
:.
c.
V>
Q)
I:
.
.~
VI
Q)
5
V>
VI
1200 I
11
't
I ';1.
,V,'
"'.11.n.H--f V'4lR----..I- -- - - +
..c:
1.2
l-
n;
$:
800 _
400
,, ,,
0 .8
L.!
\1
,'1 ,
50
100
1~1
SR
200
250
,f~
300
TR
EW
350
_'I ,
11
Fe
150
I,
we
OL
tI
,,'
h,
'..
o . BR
1\ I
\
BL
400
450
.Ii
~r
..
'/
I,
'/.'
, 'FJ
500
''I
550
600
I
ew
HU
BU
650
I 0.4
oKI,,1
700
Milepost
Note: This is a preliminary DRAFT (v3.6 dated August 23, 2011) and has been issued for information only_ It has not undergone a rigorous review by internal stakeholder groups.
750
(A39833)
Doc. No: BDE-QF- 09
Rev. 3.6
Page 47 of62

4.2 Condensate Pipeline System

Thirty (30) scenarios in total were examined for the condensate pipel in e system at the
ultimate flo w rate. The transient scenarios examined include sudde n and unplanned
pressure co ntrol valve (peV) closure (95% at intermediate stations, 1 00% at delivery
locations) and station lockout.
The transient study resulted maxi mum pressu re profiles of all scenario s, as well as the
steady-state pressure profile are shown in the figure below. I t can be seen that the wall
thickness design is adequate as the maxi mum pressure profile of all scenarios is under
the 110% MOP limit.
Note: This is a prel iminary DRAFT (v3.6 dated August 23, 201 1) and has been issued for infomlation only. It has not undergone a rigorous
(A39833)
Doc. No: BDE-QF- 09
Rev. 3.6

Page 48 of62
NGP Condensate Pipeline Maximum Pressure Profile - All Scenarios

- - Min MOP
- - 110% Min MOP
- - Maximum PressLI,'e
Steady Stete
Wall Thickness
2000
2.800
2.400
,\
1
_
1200
2.000
:;:u
1.600 :.
.2P
III
III
III
C.
Q)
Q)
:5
..)::
III
III
:E
...
0Q)
1.200
800
0.800
\
400 I 1 I
~.
"PI _ , .. If ',. _.
I r?
I'
I'
0'"
."
,
0.400
if
o
~ro
KM
NB
BU
Xl
I BL
X2
TR
EW
SR
50
100
150
II
'II
\I
H1r
'1
OL
BR
, 0.000
'
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
550
600
650
700
Milepost
Note: Tllis is a preliminary DRAFT (v3.6 dated August 23, 2011) and has been issued for information only. It has not undergone a rigorous review by internal stakeholder groups.
750
(A39833)
Doc. No: BDE-QF- 09
Rev. 3.6

Page 49 of62
Risk Management
The followin 9 section 0 utlines the risks identified by the hydraulics gro up that wi ll need to be
addressed prior to project execution.
5.1 Risk Register

Assumption/ Risk
Description
Probability
Impact Mitigati n
Strategy
(High/
Low/Med ium)
The proposed desig n of the
crude oil pipelin e is based on
single product (a II heavy). The
line w ould be ver y likely
shipping multiple products
(heavy an d light) in batches.
High
Operating limit and h

ydrau lic
resu lts w ill change. Batch
pigging w ill need to be
considered.
Conduct ope rating limit and hydraulic

modeling for Linefill w ith heavy an d
lights. Incorporate light products in
hydraulic design s and adjust pipeline
design pressures and wall thickness
where required. Model batch pig .
Parallel pump alignment
Medium
Re-selection of new pump an d

motor units
Work with Eng ineering Services to

optimize pump plan . To be reviewed
by affected groups.
ORA ma y be u sed to reduce

the number of stations on the
condensate line at Phase III.
Medium
Number of stati ons w ill reduce.

Pressu re profile along the line
will change.
Should ORA usage be conside red, a

review of the h ydraulic design w ould
necessary.
Initial oil pipe

may be low.
line th roug hput
High
Low fluid vela city and small

Reynolds num ber. Ma y be
w,
operating in laminar flo
causing quality problem.
Conduct hyd raulic analysis on low flow

rate. Identif y th e flow pattern a nd the
requirements of batch pigging.
Soil properties a long the rightof-way a re based on AMEC

desktop report. Discrepancies
with actual values ar
e
expected.
High
If actual soil
conductivity is
higher than pred icted , there will
be risk of not making the target
capacity; if the actual is lower
than predicted value, in-line
temperature will increase.
A sensitiv ity analysis in ter ms of th e

soi l conduct ivity was conducted. It is
recommended t hat an addition al soil
sampling prog ram be conducted at the
commencement of detailed
engineering.
Note: This is a preliminary DRAFT (v3 .6 dated August 23, 2011) and has been issued for inforn1ation only. It has not undergone a rigorous
(A39833)
Doc. No: BDE-QF- 09
Rev. 3.6

Mainline
Page 50 of62
?J
EN RIDGE
Appendix A: Product Specification

The tables below present the specification of crude oi l and condensate prod ucts.
Configuration Name: E28-7F 5-S E1808-REVPLFTR
PH 102: Fluid Report
Case Name:58J_kbpd_deslgn_w_BU_AT_AMEC
Page 5 of 67
Temperature 1
T e
Descri tion
Fahr.
Cel.
Temperature 2
Visco
cSt
350.000
Vapor
Pressure
Visco
Fahr.
Cel.
cSt
70.0
21.'1
'177 ..100
S .Grav.
si
PH 102: Fluid Output Report
Configuration Name:E29-4A-AUG2108-DL
PH 102: Fluid Report
Case Name:214_khpd
Poge 5 0150
Temperature 1
Descri tion
T e
COND
'Fahr.
50.0
Tempemture 2
Cel.
Fahr.
"10.0
64.9
Cel.
18.3
PH 102: Fluid Output Report

40 F (4.44 C)
Visco
cSt
1.276
Co nv.
Factor
silfi
0.321 4
Note: This is a preliminary DRAFT (v3.6 dated August 23, 20 II) and has been issued for infomlation only. It has not undergone a rigorous
(A39833)
Doc. No: BDE-QF- 09
Rev. 3.6

Mainline
Page 51 of62
Appendix B: Batch Plans

Crude Oil Pipeline
Configurat ion Name:E28-7F5-SE1808-REVP LFTR
Case Nalne:583_kbpd_design_w_BU_AT _AMEC
8lte h
10
eR4NJ
O?
;O'J(I-) FL'
HlJG-J FL'
i OJOJ FL'
FL'
Tot~:-=
To::'IfD ~v:
Page 2 of 67
KM-DEl
Volum!; OP
Fluid
OXI
OXI
OX I
OXI
PH 101: Batch Plan Data
Fluid
V olu m,",
OXI
'JXl
OXI
OXI
4IJClIJO
Condensate Pipeline
Configuration Name:E29-4A-AUG2108-DL
Case Nom e :214_kbpd
KM -1NJ
Batc h
.0
OP
PH 101: Batch Plan Data

Page 2 of 50
BR-DEL
Volume- OP
Fluid
Fluid
7:;:;:
1 0][])
7:! E
7::0::
71E
721:
; (j]O]
nE
FL'
FL'
; OJCD FL'
.~
4 0000
TcUI:
Total.'Oav:
FL'
Volum~
7::E
71E
4 0000
Note: This is a preliminary DRAFT (v3.6 dated August 23,20 II) and has been issued for infonllation only. It has not undergone a rigorous
(A39833)
Doc. No: BDE-QF- 09
Rev. 3.6
Page 52 of62

DGE
Appendix C: Pump Curves
Note: This is a preliminary DRAFT (v3.6 dated August 23 , 2011) and has been issued for infornlation only. It has not undergone a rigorous review by internal stakeholder groups.
(A39833)
Doc. No: BDE-QF- 09
Rev. 3.6
Page 53 of62
.Hydraulic Design Proposal Mainline

Note: This is a preliminary DRAFT (v3.6 dated August 23 , 2011) and has been issued for information only. It has not undergone a rigorous review by internal stakeholder groups.
(A39833)
Doc. No: BDE-QF- 09
Rev. 3.6
Page 54 of62

(A39833)
Doc. No: BDE-QF- 09
Rev. 3.6

Page 55 of62
Appendix D: Graphical Hydraulic Profiles

36" Crude Oil Pipeline Hydraulic Profiles - Phase I Flow (583 kbpd)
(onng: E28~N00310-REVT-vlA-PH1-Ann Case: 525_TA_EAJD
Hydraulic Gradient Profile

Profile of max head + elevation, head + elevation, elevation vs Milepost
Hilepos t:8.60
"
(m.iles)
HAOH=8110
(tt)
HoIIIad"'7055
(ft.)
Iilev&t1on-Z110
( tt)
IiQQQQl
1000
9.5K
9.5K
9 .0K
9.0K
8 .5K
8.5K
a.OK
B.OK
7 . SK
7.SK
7.0K
7.0K
6.5K
6.5K
6.0K
6.0K
S.SK
5 .5K
~
5 , oK
"'"
1l
5 .0K
i .5K
4.5K
" .OK
".OK
3.5K
3.5K
3.0K
3.0K
2 . SK
2.51(
2.OK
2.0K
1.5)(
l.5K
1000.0
1000.0
500.0
500 .0
Ml
Milepost (mSes)
(A39833)
Doc. No: BDE-QF- 09
Rev. 3.6
Page 56 of62

36" Crude Oil Pipeline Hydraulic Profiles - Phase IV Flow (944 kbpd)
Config: E28-SE2109-REVRHFAfvIEC Case: 944kbpd_Design
Hydraulic GradientProfile
Profile of max head + elevation, head + elevation, elevation vs Mi lepost
9.0K
9,OK
:3,5K
8,5K
a,OK
a,OK
7, 5K
7,5K
7.0K
7.0K
6,5K
6,5K
6,OK
6,OK
5,5K
5,5K
5.0K
5.0K
4,5K
4,OK
<[
3,5K
:::
g
~
"
4~rI
4,OK
3,5K
3,OK
3,OK
2, 5K
2,5K
2,OK
2,OK
L5K
1.5K
1000,0
1000,0
500,0
500,0
P.Ol
[;
iii
P.O
f~ilepost
(miles)
(A39833)
Doc. No: BDE-QF- 09
Rev. 3.6
Page 57 of62

Mainline
20" Condensate Pipeline Hydraulic Profiles - Phase I Flow (214 kbpd)
[onflg: E29-N003tO-REVT-YIA-PHl-Ann Case: 193_TA_EA]D
Profile of max head + elevation) head

llilepost=606.6Z (lAiles)
10000
9,()K
'"
(ft)
+ elevation) elevation vs Milepo51:
Blevat:ion-Z343 (ft)
9.5K
9.0K
B.5K
8.51(
8.0t(
8,OK
7.SK
7.SK
7.01:
7.Q!(
6,s*(
6.51(
6.01:
6.0K
S.5K
~
g 5'5K~ So
5.0K
So
Ha.d-6264
[jQQQ
9.51(
9.SK
lIAOH =7617 (ftl
S.CK
; .51(
4.51(
tiJ
4 ,ot~
4.0K
3.SK
3.SI(
3 .0K
3.01(
2.51(
2.5K
2.OK
2.0I(
1.5K
1.51:
1000.0
1000.0
500.0
500 ,0
IJ:Ol
IJ:Ol
Milepo5t(miles)
Note: Th is is a preliminary DRAFT (v3.6 dated August 23, 2011) and has been issued for information only. It has not undergone a rigorous review by internal stakeholder groups.
(A39833)
Doc. No: BDE-QF- 09
Rev. 3.6
Page 58 of62

Mainline
20" Condensate Pipeline Hydraulic Profiles - Phase III Flow (306 kbpd)
(oong: E29- N00310-REVT-v2A-UlT-Ann Case: 275_TA_EA_FD
Prone of max head + elevation, head + ele....ation, elevation 'IS Milepost

IUlepo 5t:z460 . 47 (triles )
,I
9.51(
9.01(
Z"
6.51::
8.5K
B.OK
7, 5K
7.0K
7,OK
6.5K
6.51(
6.01(
6,OK
5. 5K
g 5'5] ~
1 5.01: 'Ii
5.0K
"
' .5K
Elevation" Z370 Ctt)
9.51(
7.5K
J:
0
He ad"'4675 I te)
9.0K
B.OK
'=-
HAOH=7618 (ft)
4.5K
"1.0K
4.0K
3.5K
3.5K
3.0K
3.0K
2.5K
2.5K
2,OK
2.0K
1.51(
J.5K
1000.0
1000.0
501),0
500,0
Il.(j
Il.O
iii
Milepost (miles)
Note: Tllis is a preliminary DRAFT (v3.6 dated August 23,2011) and has been issued for information only, It has not undergone a rigorous review by internal stakeholder groups.
(A39833)
Doc. No: BDE-QF- 09
Rev. 3.6
Page 59 of62

Appendix E: Sensitivity Analysis
(A39833)
Doc. No: BDE-QF- 09
Rev. 3.6
Page 60 of62

(A39833)
Doc. No: BDE-QF- 09
Rev. 3.6
Page 61 of62

ENBRIDGE
(A39833)
Doc. No: BDE-QF- 09
Rev. 3.6
Page 62 of62


Pipeline Hydraulic Design Proposal

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Pipeline Hydraulic Design Proposal

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

(A39833)

Doc. No: BDE-QF- 09

BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING

Hydraulic Design Proposal Mainline