Professional Documents
Culture Documents
INTRODUCTION
Emissions Trading
POLLUTION CONTROL
Pollution Control
Market-based Approach
Form
Scope
ETS Design
Allowance Allocation
Compliance Cycle
ETS Form
Cap
Authority determine acceptable level of emissions representing an absolute emissions cap.
Cap divided into a number of units (allowance), each of which authorises the holder to emit a predetermined quantity of emissions. Allowances allocated amongst participants; quantity of allowances that a firm is allocated representing their emissions target. Firms must ensure that at the end of each year they have a sufficient quantity of allowances to cover their emissions for that calendar year
Trade
Companies that keep their emissions below the level of their allocation can sell their excess allowances. Those facing difficulty in keeping their emissions in line with their allowances have a choice between taking measures to reduce their own emissions or buying the extra allowances they need on the market. Decision determined by relative costs, i.e. market price -v- in-house abatement cost
Baseline
Participants are permitted to emit baseline level of emissions.
Baseline defined in terms of historical emissions technology standard, i.e. ratio of emissions to output
or
performance
Credit
Baseline establishes a standard against which emissions credits can be generated. Firms must ensure that at the end of each year emissions are in line with baseline Those facing difficulty in complying with baseline have a choice between taking measures to reduce their own emissions or buying the extra credits on the market.
Applies to all emissions All emissions can be traded Allowances are allocated by regulatory authority
OF
REGULATION
Emissions
Type
ETS Compatible
POINT OF REGULATION
ETS
Coverage
Upstream
Downstream
Indirect Emitters
Direct Emitters
Units expressed in terms of 1 tonne of a covered pollutant; E.g. EUA = one tonne of CO2
Unit allows holder to emit one tonne of covered pollutant within a given time period, typically one year.
Trading Periods
Banking
Allows ETS participants to save or bank any excess allowances for future use or to sell on later.
Borrowing
Process whereby installations could exceed their allowances on the basis that they make up the difference at some point within the trading period.
Banking
Compliance flexibility exposure to price instability Safety margin against contingencies unexpected
Borrowing
Provide a safety blanket in the event of there being a substantial price spike in the units market.
ALLOWANCE ALLOCATION
Allocation
Free Allocation
Auctioning
FREE ALLOCATION
Free
Allocation
Grandfathering
Projected Profiles
Benchmarks
AUCTIONING Participants bid to purchase emissions allowances from the trading schemes administrator. In an auction buyers are pitted against one and other to ensure that the auctioned item goes to the user that values it most as expressed in what they are willing to pay. Auctioning allowances would mean that firms regulated by the trading scheme would have to pay for all their emissions, thus conforming to the polluter pays principle. A crucial choice for administrators using the auction mechanism is how to use auction revenues, which could be recycled back to bidders, used to reduce specific taxes, or put into general revenues or some combination.
Facilitates:
Allowance creation (via free allocation or auctioning) in participant accounts; Allowance trading & transfer;
Surrendering of allowances for compliance to cover verified emissions and the subsequent deletion of such surrendered allowances.
REGISTRY:
ETS Participant Accounts
P3: 2013-2020
Participants: Countries:
C&T ETS
What are the Market & Price Fundamentals in the EU carbon market?
10
15
20
25
30
35
0 1/4/2008 5/4/2008 9/4/2008 1/4/2009 5/4/2009 9/4/2009 1/4/2010 5/4/2010 9/4/2010 1/4/2011 5/4/2011 9/4/2011 1/4/2012 5/4/2012 9/4/2012 1/4/2013 EUA Price
Market fundamentals of the EU carbon market are similar to those in other markets they relate to supply and demand.
The allowance allocation that installations receive will influence the role that they are likely to play in the market:
Installation allocations generous relative to emissions = sellers in the allowance market.
Participating installations will be allowance buyers where their allocation is insufficient to cover their emissions needs and/or the costs of abatement exceed the allowance price.
Weather
Carbon Price
Economic Growth
Fuel Prices
Warm weather effect linked to urban heat island effect As a result of increasing their output, power generators CO2 emissions will increase;
HEP SHARE
Member State Gross Prod. (TWh) Coal Prod. (TWh)
OF
Austria Belgium Czech Rep. Denmark Estonia Finland France Germany Greece Hungary Ireland Italy
70.83 96.44 85.91 38.57 12.96 80.35 572.88 621.00 61.63 37.38 60.64 298.21
6.28 7.75 50.18 16.94 11.57 21.28 26.53 270.53 27.42 6.31 33.03 41.6 25.19 138.26 7.19 4.16 5.29 26.12 3.5 109.77 0.12
1.26 0.33 0.16 0.84 0.04 0.61 6.34 7.50 7.68 0.46 2.23 21.55 1.34 2.88 2.29 0.61 0.01 16.51 2.72 3.37 0.03
14.46 31.11 1.07 7.86 0.30 11.15 26.2 84.50 16.54 11.61 21.62 153.8 15.76 22.78 428.59 140.56 47.94 28.00
38.58 1.67 3.38 0.02 0.03 12.88 68.04 25.93 7.49 0.19 0.73 53.77
Lux.
Neth. Poland Portugal Slovakia Slovenia Spain Sweden UK Norway
4.59
114.73 157.54 53.08 27.47 16.43 298.41 152.98 381.25 124.46
2.92
71.31 4.81 14.82 1.92 0.55 93.38 4.27 175.55 4.89 14.57 5.66 61.79 57.57 62.14 3.97
1.47
0.11 3.48 16.55 5.63 4.70 45.32 71.51 6.71 117.94 0.20
0.08
4.19 1.66 9.31 0.04 0.01 50.58 3.49 10.04 1.05
0.13
8.64 6.46 2.73 0.54 0.22 4.71 9.91 13.67 0.43
ESTIMATED VARIATIONS
OF
DUE TO
Member State
Fuel Switching The existence of fuel switching is important as it enables power generators to exploit short-term price differentials between fuel types. Some power generators are able to burn two or three different fossil fuels and switch between them. Changes in fossil fuel prices can change the merit order of plants using different fuels, thereby affecting the fuel mix in the short run.
Because the power sector accounts for approximately 70% of ETS emissions, the carbon-intensity of their fuel mix is potentially significant in terms of the potential impact on allowance price.
The opposite occurs when a power generator switches from natural gas to either oil or coal; Generator now using a more emissions-intensive fuel source, emissions will relative to normal position, seek to cover in demand by purchasing additional allowances; Oil is between natural gas and coal in terms of CO2 intensity. This means that the impact on EUA prices of switching away from oil will depend on which fuel type generators switch to.
(2010)
Solar/ Wind Prod. (TWh) 2.08 2.29 0.95 7.81 0.28 0.68 10.82 BF& Waste Prod. (TWh) 8.17 5.36 2.17 5.09 0.74 10.98 6.38 40.44 0.25 2.51 0.22 11.35 0.13 8.64 6.46 2.73 0.54
Austria Belgium Czech Rep. Denmark Estonia Finland France Germany Greece Hungary Ireland Italy Lux. Neth. Poland Portugal Slovakia
70.83 96.44 85.91 38.57 12.96 80.35 572.88 621.00 61.63 37.38 60.64 298.21 4.59 114.73 157.54 53.08 27.47
6.28 7.75 50.18 16.94 11.57 21.28 26.53 270.53 27.42 6.31 33.03 41.6
1.26 0.33 0.16 0.84 0.04 0.61 6.34 7.50 7.68 0.46 2.23 21.55
38.58 1.67 3.38 0.02 0.03 12.88 68.04 25.93 7.49 0.19 0.73 53.77 1.47 0.11 3.48 16.55 5.63 0.20 5.36 0.03
51.52 2.27 0.54 2.81 10.78 0.08 4.19 1.66 9.31 0.04
Slovenia
Spain Sweden UK
16.43
298.41 152.98 381.25
5.29
26.12 3.5 109.77
0.01
16.51 2.72 3.37
0.55
93.38 4.27 175.55
5.66
61.79 57.57 62.14
4.70
45.32 71.51 6.71
0.01
50.58 3.49 10.04
0.22
4.71 9.91 13.67
Dark & Spark Spread Relationship with the Carbon Price Power generators also pay particular attention to both the dark and spark spread as well as the difference between them. Dark spread is the theoretical profit that a coal-fired power plant makes from selling a unit of electricity having purchased the fuel required to produce that unit of electricity. Spark spread refers to the equivalent for gas-fired power plants. Where the difference between these measures one would expect this to have a positive impact on allowance price because utilities will prefer to use the more CO2 intensive coal-fired power plant to the gas-fired plant resulting in an demand for allowances.
The carbon market was created through a political decision making process.
The central policy and regulatory issue for the EU ETS is the allowance allocation process The supply of allowances is politically determined by the Commission. Commissions decisions likely to affect buying and selling in the EUA market through their effect on market sentiment or perceptions about potential supply and demand of allowances Additional regulatory issues include:
Annual release of verified emissions reports, potential to have a market impact because they indicate the position of individual market players as well as the market in general; Decisions regarding future shape of the carbon market; Amendments to market structure (Phising, VAT fraud)
Central to market participation is the full functioning of Member State allowance registries and market intermediaries (exchanges, spot market, futures market, OTC market).
Any factors that impact negatively on market functioning are likely to lead to decreased participation in the carbon market as well as decreasing the volume of allowances available for use in the market. Such factors will serve to decrease liquidity along with the potential for price volatility on account of the decrease in market activity.
Natural events have the potential to have both a direct impact on price and also influence market sentiment. The impact of natural events is felt when they disrupt the international supply of oil. Reduction in the supply of oil will naturally increases its price, thereby affecting the fuel switching decisions of the power sector participants in the ETS.
Political decisions made by OPEC regarding the supply of oil influence the carbon price. OPEC decisions or announcements regarding future supply of oil can affect market sentiment as it provides a signal to the power sector about whether they will have to adjust their level of oil use and switch to other fuel sources. International political events that are likely to influence the shape and future of the global carbon market will influence price. Climate change negotiations are always watched with keen interest by those associated with the carbon market. Carbon market participants are actively looking for indications regarding the future structure of the market.