Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Carlisle Rainey
Florida State University
Carlisle Rainey
1/ 15
Table of Contents
1 2 3 4
Review and Preview Motivation and Institutional Design Preliminaries Some Results from Social Choice Theory Condorcets Paradox The Reversal Paradox Agenda Setting Conclusion
Carlisle Rainey
2/ 15
Review
Basic Tools of Comparative Politics
Game theory Regression tables
Transitions to Democracy
Economic theories Institutional theories Collective action Incomplete information
Political Parties
Function and Role Duvergers Law
Carlisle Rainey Introduction to Social Choice Theory 3/ 15
Preview
Carlisle Rainey
4/ 15
One important topic in comparative politics is institutional design. We believe that some outcomes are better than others. Institutional design focuses on how to produce certain outcomes (e.g. stable democracy, higher turnout, more or less policy change) using political institutions. Social choice theory forms the foundation of institutional design. Social choice theory focuses on how to aggregate preferences.
Carlisle Rainey
5/ 15
Preliminaries
Denition sincere voting - voting for ones most preferred option strategic voting - voting for for a less preferred option because it will produce a more preferred outcome
Carlisle Rainey
6/ 15
Rationality
Denition preference ordering - a ranking of possible outcomes (e.g. Snickers Twix Butternger) rational - possess a complete and transitive preference ordering over a set of outcomes complete preference ordering - the actor has a preference between all possible outcomes, either preferring one to the other, or being indierent between the two. transitive preference ordering - if an actor prefers Snickers to Twix, and Twix to Butternger, then that actor must prefer Snickers to Butternger See the text for more formal denitions.
Carlisle Rainey Introduction to Social Choice Theory 7/ 15
Round-Robin Tournament
Denition round-robin tournament - each competing alternative is pit against every other alternative in a series of pair-wise votes.
Exercise
1 2 3 4
Get into groups of three (or as close as possible). Have a vote between Snickers and Twix - note the groups decision. Repeat for Snickers and Butternger. Repeat for Twix and Butternger. Is everyone in the group rational? Are their preferences complete and transitive? Does one candy bar win against all others? Which?
Carlisle Rainey Introduction to Social Choice Theory 8/ 15
Questions
1
Condorcets Paradox
Denition Condorcets Paradox - a group that is composed of individuals with rational preferences does not necessarily have rational preferences as a collectivity; individual rationality is not sucient to ensure group rationality Condorcet winner - an alternative that beats all other options in a series of pair-wise contests
Carlisle Rainey
9/ 15
Three girls need to decide where to do to dinner together One suggests Applebees (A), another Burger King (B), and the last Churchs Chicken (C) So, of course, they have a pair-wise contest to nd the Condorcet winner. Each girl has complete and transitive preferences.
Carlisle Rainey
10/ 15
B C A
C A B
Which restaurant wins the contest between Applebees and Burger King? Applebees and Churchs Chicken? Burger King and Churchs Chicken? Is there a Condorcet winner?
Carlisle Rainey Introduction to Social Choice Theory 11/ 15
2 3 4
Each individual ranks the outcomes from most to least preferred. Assign points to reect each outcomes ranking (e.g. 3 to highest, 2 to middle, 1 to least preferred). Sum the points for each possible outcome. The outcome with the most points wins. Question: If the girls used the Borda count rather than pair-wise voting, what outcome would win?
Carlisle Rainey
12/ 15
It receives a lower score than all the original choices. It is not the rst choice of any girl.
Amy has preference ordering A Betty has preference ordering B Carol has preference ordering C
B C Z
C Z A
Z A B
Carlisle Rainey
13/ 15
Conclusion
From this lecture and readings, you should be able to answer the following questions:
1 2
Describe what it means to have rational preferences. Find the Condorcet winner and/or determine whether one exists for a given set of preferences. Describe and give an example of Condorcets paradox. Describe and give an example of the reversal paradox. Describe and give and example of the power of agenda setting.
3 4 5
Carlisle Rainey
15/ 15