Somali Aggregate

AID Washington USAID Mogadishu
Contract Number AFR 0114-C-00-3021-00 Project Number 649-0114 Amendment No. I
Somali Democratic Republic
Kismayo Port Rehabilitation Additional Site Investigation Report

Parsons Brinckerhoff International, Inc.
Mogadishu e New York March 1984
AID Washington USAID Mogadishu
Contract Number AFR 0114-C-00-3021 -00

Project Number 649-0114
Amendment No. 1
Somali Democratic Republic
Kismayo Port Rehabilitation Additional Site Investigation Report

Mogadishu New York March 1984
KISMAYO PORT REHABILITATION

ADDITIONAL SITE INVESTIGATION REPORT
TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 1.2
2.0
Background
Purpose
1
2
SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS INVESTIGATIONS

2.1 Subsurface Investigation at Port
2.2
3.0
Material Source Survey
SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION AT PORT
3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 4.0
Description of Work
3.1.1 Water Jet Probings
3.1.2 Borings
Geology
Soil Stratigraphy
Considerations for Design and Construction
7
7
8
9
9
11
AGGREGATE SOURCE INVESTIGATION

4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 4.6 General
Interviews with Contractors and Government Agencies Additional Quarry Sites Exploration Program
Results of Materials Testing
Recommendations for Wharf Rehabilitation
4.6.1 Fine Aggregate for Concrete
4.6.2 Coarse Aggregate for Concrete
4.6.3 Pavement Base Material
14
15
16
17
19
22
22
23
24
25
28
5.0
WATER SOUR(XE INVESTIGATION
6.0 WHARF TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY

REFERENCES
TABLE OF CONTENTS (Cont'd)
PLATES
Plate Plate Plate Plate Plate Plate Plate Plate 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Location Plan
Existing Wharf Structure
Recommended Rehabilitation Scheme
Location Plan, Water Borings
Location Plan, Water Jet Probings
Soil Profile, Section A-A
Soil Profile, Section B-B
Profile of Driving Records for
Existing Fender Piles
Location Plan, North Quarry Sites
Location Plan, South Quarry Site
Plate 9 Plate 10
APPENDICES
Appendix Appendix Appendix Appendix Appendix
A B C D E
Logs of Water Jet Probings

Logs of Water Borings
Logs of Quarry Borings
Laboratory Test Results
Profiles from Soundings Beneath
Wharf Platform
LIST OF TABLES Page Table 1 Table 2 Table 3 Design Soil Profiles for Wharf Rehabilitation Summary of Laboratory Testing for Quarry Samples Preliminary Results of Water Sample Analyses 12 20 26
1.0 1.1 Background
INTRODUCTION

(PBI) has been contracted by the
United States Agency for International Development (USAID) to perform a
preliminary design study,
and to prepare final design documents for the
rehabilitation of the Port of Kismayo, Somali Democratic Republic (SDR).
The
preliminary design phase of
the project commenced in January 1983 and
was
completed
in July 1983. Final design for the port rehabilitation was
initiated in November 1983, and is scheduled for completion in June 1984.
The Port of Kismayo
is located on the southern coast of the Somali
Democratic Republic, 375 km
(325 mi) south of the capital city of Mogadishu;
48 km (28 mi) south of the equator; and 8 km (5 mi) south of the mouth of the
Juba River (Plate 1). The existing pier has a capacity for four berths along
its approximately 620 m (2,030 ft) L-shaped length.
A preliminary design report(l) prepared by PBI,
and dated July 1983,
considered technical and socioeconomic aspects of the Port of Kismayo
rehabilitation, and presented
three alternative rehabilitation schemes. The
recommended alternative
requires replacement of the existing pile supported
deck structure
with an anchored sheetpile bulkhead located
12.2 m (40 ft)
beyond the edge of the existing wharf platform. Anchorage for the bulkhead
would be provided by a continuous sheetpile deadman.
Cross sections of the
existing wharf structure and
recommended rehabilitation scheme
are presented
in Plates 2 and 3, respectively.
A site investigation for the Port of Kismayo rehabilitation was performed
in 1982 by Tippetts-Abbett-MoCarthy-Stratton
(TAMS) (2), and is summarized in
Chapter 2 of this report.
During the preliminary design effort
it became
evident
that an additional site investigaton was required to obtain
information necessary to
proceed with final design. PBI received
authorization to
perform this additional site investigation under Amendment
No. 1, dated October 16, 1983, to
the preliminary design contract. This
report presents a description of the additional site investigations performed,
and summarizes their findings.
-1
1.2 Purpose
The additional site investigation included
a subsurface investigation at
the port site, an aggregate
source survey, a port topographic survey, and a
water source survey. Following are the specific purposes
of these
investigations:
Port Site Investigation
o Investigate subsurface conditions
along the alignment
of
the
proposed bulkhead structure.

o Determine layers or
boulders, identified during the
previous site investigation, exist along the recommended bulkhead
alignment, and determine the thickness and plan limits of the coral.
subsurface conditions
at the two proposed mooring
if coral
o Investigate
dolphin locations.
Aggregate Source Investigation
o Evaluate the suitability of available material for
concrete coarse
aggregate and pavement base material from existing local
quarry
sites and other sites outside the Kismayo area.
Port Topographic Survey
o Perform topographic survey of existing port facilities.
o
Define the surface of the existing slope beneath the pile supported
wharf platform.
Water Source Investigation
o Evaluate the quality of water
from the Juba River for use in mixing
concrete. Sampling and testing of water to
be conducted during
-2
periods of both high flow and low flow to evaluate tidal influence on water quality.
-3
2.0
SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS INVESTIGATIONS
2.1
Subsurface Investigation at Port
A previous subsurface investigation was conducted at the Port of Kismayo

by TAMS in November and December, 1982, and is described in their report
"Field Technical Surveys for Port of Kismayo, Somali Democratic Republic",
dated February 1983. The subsurface exploration program included nine borings
drilled at the edge of the existing pile supported wharf platform, four
borings at the mole fill area behind the wharf platform, five borings within
the inner harbor, and three borings in the outer harbor adjacent to the ship
approach channel. The location of borings along the edge of the wharf
structure are shown in Plate 4. The previous
investigation also included
water jet probings and an extensive bathymetric survey of the inner and outer
harbor areas.
Limited subsurface investigations of the port area were made prior to the
TAMS study. A series of water jet probings were performed in 1960 and 1961 to
gather information for the original construction of the wharf and breakwater
structures.
In 1964 three borings were also performed for the original wharf
construction. In 1980 four
borings were drilled for construction of the
molasses tank located
on the northwest end of the port. Information from
these previous investigations are summarized in the TAMS report( 2 ).
Previous investigations indicate that along the edge of the existing
wharf platform the soil stratification below sea bottom generally includes
a
surface layer of very loose to loose silt and sand
to a depth of about 3 m (10 ft), underlain by medium dense to very dense silty sand. A coral formation of unknown thickness was encountered at about elevation -34 m (-112 ft). Gravel size coral fragments were recovered throughout the soil profile. Of particular importance to the present design is the presence of hard ground at shallow depth beneath the sea bottom. During the previous investigation three borings encountered a coral layer or boulders at shallow depth in the area of berth 1. In one boring, K-7, the coral was found to be 3.8 m (12 ft) thick. It was uncertain whether this hard ground was a natural coral formation, or displaced rip-rap from the original construction.
-4
A design analysis report( 3 ) prepared by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

in October 1961
for the design of the existing port facility reported the
presence of a "crust of hard material, presumed to be of coral origin" at the
ground surface prior to construction. However, it
is likely that this crust
was
removed during dredging of the inner harbor basin.
information regarding the
presence
of a hard coral stratum was
obtained from Mowlem Construction Company of London, contractor
for the 1979
installation of the cantilever
steel H-pile fendering system at the Port of
Further
Kismayo.
According to Mowlem, when

the fender piles were driven, the "coral
penetrated by employing
standard
methods,
and predrilling or
breaking up of the "crust" was
not required.
Pile driving records from the
construction of the
existing steel H-pile fendering system are presented in
the profiles of Plate 8.
These profiles generally show
a sharp increase in
driving resistance between elevation -12 m (-39 ft) and -17
m (-56 ft).
However, along the southwest half of berth 1, corresponding to the area where
a shallow coral
formation was encountered in the borings
for the TANS
investigation, relatively high driving
resistance was observed as high as
elevation -9 m (-30 ft).
Another significant observation from
these
construction records is the presence of very loose material to elevation -16 m
(-53 ft) indicated in the area of berth 3.
2.2
crust" was
Material Source Survey

The TAMS investigation( 2 )
included a material
source survey which
evaluated existing quarry sites
in the Kismayo area for potential sources of
pavement base material
and fine and coarse aggregate for use in concrete.
Also, samples from available water sources
in the Kismayo area were collected
for testing their suitability for use in mixing concrete.
Three quarry sites, identified as the Control Point Quarry, Old Airport
Quarry
and Sheikh Road Quarry, were evaluated. The locations of these
quarries
are shown in Plates
9 and 10. For the investigation, five
core
borings were performed and numerous
test pit and surface samples were
obtained.
Details of the investigation and a discussion of the findings
are
presented in the TAMS report. The bedrock at all three quarries is s.inilarly described as a "porous coral limestone". Based on the results of laboratory
-5
tests, the study concluded that the available quarry material was unsuitable
for use as coarse aggregate for concrete, and it was recommended that
consideration be given to obtaining dense, good quality coarse
aggregate from
sources located outside the Kismayo area. The study also concluded that test
pit samples from the Control Point Quarry and Sheikh Road Quarry were best suited for pavement base course. However, these materials were considered to
be of poor quality which might degrade under compaction equipment and truck traffic, leading to rutting of the pavement surface.
The previous investigation recommended "dune" sand deposits from the Old Airport Quarry as a source of fine aggregate for construction. However, a
visual reconnaissance of the Old Airport Quarry and an inspection of samples from the TAMS investigation indicated that the recommended fine aggregate
source is beach sand rather than dune sand. Dune sand, which is fine grained and uniformly graded, would be a poor source of fine aggregate. The beach sand would require some processing to modify its natural gradation to conform to ASTM standards.
The previous water source investigation evaluated the quality of water
obtained from local wells, untreated water from near the mouth of the Juba
River, and treated river water from the Port of Kismayo water supply system.
Results from the analysis of water samples indicated that the Juba River would be an acceptable source of water for construction purposes. The conclusion was based on laboratory tests on river water samples obtained during flood stage, when the influence of tidal action on water quality is minimal. The previous study recommended however, that additional samples be tested during periods of low flow to investigate any tidal influence on the sulfate and
chloride content.
-6
3.0 3.1 Description of Work
SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION AT PORT
A subsurface exploration program was performed at the Port of Kismayo as part of the additional site investigation by PBI. The exploration at the port
site, conducted during November 1983, consisted of water jet probings
and
water borings. The work was performed by Geodrill Ltd., of Mombasa, Kenya, under subcontract to PBI, and inspection services for the field work were provided by PBI. The details of the equipment and work performed are described below. 3.1.1 Water Jet Probings
Water jet probings were conducted to locate the surface of boulders or

coral layer along the proposed alignment of the sheetpile bulkhead. The
equipment used consisted of a 7 m (23 ft) long, 2.5 cm (1 in.) diameter steel pipe fitted with
a reducer nozzle tip to increase water exit velocity. To
determine penetration of the jet probe below sea bottom the pipe was marked at intervals of 0.10 m (4 in.) starting from the bottom of the probe. Sea water was pumped through the pipe by a high pressure piston pump, with a section of rubber hose between the pump and the top of the
probe. Divers manually
advanced the probe pipe vertically into the seabed by repeatedly raising and lowering the probe with the water jet at high pressure. The penetration below
the seabed was recorded when refusal was met or when the probe pipe penetrated essentially its full length. The soils encountered at the bottom of the probe
hole were identified by the resistance to penetration, and by examining
samples of material recovered from the tip of the probe pipe.
A total of thirty-one (31) jet probings were performed. The probings
were located 12.2 m (40 ft) from the edge of the existing wharf structure. An
initial series of probings were made generally at 29 m (96 ft) intervals along
the entire length of proposed bulkhead alignment. Additional probes were then made between the initial set where hard material was encountered. The locations of the water jet probings are presented in Plate 5, and logs of the probings are contained in Appendix A.
-7
3.1.2
Borings
The exploration program included six water borings at the locations shown
in Plate 4. Two borings, WB-l and WB-6, were drilled at proposed mooring
dolphin locations at each end of the wharf to determine subsurface conditions
for the design of pile foundations. The four remaining borings, WB-2 through
WB-5, were drilled 12.2 m (40 ft) from the edge of the existing wharf
structure along the alignment of the proposed sheetpile bulkhead. these borings, located along berths
Three of
the
1 and 2, were drilled to evaluate
hard stratum encountered by the water jet probings, and to obtain samples from
this stratum for visual inspection and laboratory testing. One boring, WB-2,
was drilled in the area of berth 3 where the water jet probings indicated very
soft material for the full 7 m (23 ft) depth penetrated by the water jet
probings.
The
borings
at
the
mooring
dolphins
were
drilled
to
depth
of
approximately 25 m (82 ft) below the seabed.
The four borings adjacent to the
existing wharf were drilled to a depth of 9.5 m (31 ft)

to 10 m (33 ft) below
the seabed. Logs of the water borings are contained in Appendix B.
Soil sampling in the borings consisted of standard split spoon samples
obtained generally at 1.5 m (5 ft) intervals and at changes in strata.
Sampling was performed in accordance with ASTM D 1586 procedures. Recovered
samples were visually classified and then sealed in plastic containers for
later laboratory testing.
The borings were drilled from the stern of the diving support/salvage
vessel M.V. Venturer using a Pilcon Mark 2 marine drill. Except for surface
and near surface samples the drill unit was supported independent of the
vessel to avoid disturbance due to motion of the vessel.
The drill unit was
mounted to the top of a 15 cm (6 in.) diameter pipe casing through which the
bore hole was advanced. For surface and near surface samples the casing was
clamped to the working platform at the stern of the vessel. An overhead A frame structure was used for lifting the drill rod string. After obtaining a
split spoon sample at the seabed surface, the boring was advanced by lowering
or driving the casing to the next sampling depth. The casing was then cleaned
out with a drag bit, or tricone roller bit where gravelly material was
-8
encountered, and the next

split spoon sample was obtained. A bentonite and
barite slurry mixture
was used for the drill fluid to prevent the bore hole
bottom from heaving and also to provide more efficient removal of the drill
cuttings.
When the casing was seated a sufficient depth into firm material
the boring was continued uncased.
Laboratory tests on samples recovered by the water
borings included grain
size analyses and Atterberg Limit determinations. All laboratory testing was
performed by Central Testing Laboratories Ltd. of Nairobi, Kenya. The results
of the laboratory tests are presented in Appendix D.
3.2 Geology
The Somali Democratic Republic lies within the eastern part of

the
northeast African structural block which is triangular-shaped and bounded on
the north by the Gulf of Aden, on the west by the Abyssinian fault trough, and
on the east by the Indian Ocean.
In the southern regions of the SDR, the
surface of bedrock is generally
covered by a thick mantle of unconsolidated materials of quaternary age,
including
alluvial, aeolian, and marine deposits, and coral reef
4 formations( ).
The Port of Kismayo area
is composed of marine deposits of undetermined
thickness, which generally consist
of fine sand and silt, and include
extensive coral reef formations. These warm-water
marine deposits contain a
high concentration of carbonates
which exhibit lower hardness and weaker
structure than silica deposits( 5 ).
Kismayo is located in an area
of low seismic activity. not designed for seismic forces.
3.3 Soil Stratigraphy
Structures are
Along the proposed alignment of the sheetpile bulkhead the seabed varies
in elevation from approximately -8.6 m (-28 ft) to -10.6 m (-35 ft),
MLWS
Datum. The seabed surface along the proposed bulkhead alignment, shown in
-9
Plates 6 and 7, was generally found to be 1 to 3 m

(3 to 10 ft) lower than the
seabed surface along the edge of the existing wharf platform.
Subsurface conditions along the proposed bulkhead alignment are presented
in the profiles of Plates 6 and 7.
These profiles summarize the findings of
the water
jet probings and water borings performed for this investigation, and
also show soil conditions encountered in the wharf borings performed for
the
previous site investigation.
Along the proposed bulkhead alignment the existing soil stratification
includes a surface layer of very loose silty sand and sandy silt, or
very soft
silty clay. Generally this layer is approximately 1 m (3 ft) thick, but in
the vicinity of berth 3, and the southwest portion of berth 2, very soft silty
clay extends to
a depth of as much as 3 m (10 ft), and is underlain by
approximately 2 m
(7 ft) of very loose silty sand.
Generally, the soft surface stratum is underlain by 2 to 3 m
(7 to 10 ft)
of loose
to medium dense silty sand which extends to about elevation -13 to
-17 m
(-43 to -56 ft). This stratum is underlain by medium dense to very
dense silty sand to the surface of
a coral formation approximately at
elevation
-34 m (-112 ft). Coarse to fine coral gravel
was encountered
throughout the soil profile, but was concentrated primarily between elevations
-13 and -20 m (-43 and -66 ft), and below about elevation -30 m (-98 ft).
Along the southwest portion of berth 1 the
soil stratification differs
somewhat from the
above described general condition. In this area the very
soft surface layer is directly underlain by dense to very dense silty sand
containing coral gravel, the surface of which was
encountered at approximately
elevation -11 m (-36 ft). As discussed in Section 2.1, the borings performed
for the TAMS investigation encountered coral
at a shallow depth in this
same
area, requiring coring through coral
as thick as 3.8 m (12 ft). No
solid
coral was encountered in the
current borings drilled 12.2 m (40 ft) outboard
of the previous borings.
Boring WB-4 did encounter a thin
layer of cemented
sand at approximately elevation -13 m (-43 ft).
The driving resistance profile for existing steel fender piles, shown in
Plate 8, closely parallels
the subsurface conditions encountered in the
-10
borings and water jet probings. Hard pile driving was encountered at shallow
depth along the southwest portion of berth 1, corresponding to the area where
hard bottom was encountered at shallow depth during the subsurface exploration
programs. In the vicinity of berth 3 the steel
fender piles penetrated to
elevation -16 m
(-53 ft) under the pile and hammer weight alone. It is in
this area where boring WB-2 encountered soft soil
deposits to approximately
elevation -16 m (-53 ft).
The driving resistance profile is a valuable index
for determining the lateral limits
of different ground conditions as it
provides a continuous profile along the edge of the existing wharf platform.
3.4 Considerations for Design and Construction
The existing to subsoil conditions described
be
three different soil
profiles for design of the sheetpile
bulkhead. These profiles, identified
as profiles A, B and C, are presented in
Table 1, and preliminary limits of each profile are shown in Plate 4.
simplified In profile A, loose
to medium dense silty sand extends from the mudline
to elevation -13 m (-43 ft), and is underlain by medium dense to
very dense
silty, gravelly sand. Profile A is generally located along berth 4, and the
northeast portion of berth 2.
In profile B, loose
to elevation -17 m (-56 ft), and is underlain by medium dense
to very dense
silty, gravelly sand. Profile B is generally located along berth 3, the
southwest portion of berth 2, and the northeast portion of berth 1.
In profile C, loose
to elevation -11 m (-36 ft), and is underlain by medium dense
to very dense
silty, gravelly sand. Profile C is anticipated for a length of approximately
63 m (207 ft) along the southwest portion of berth 1.
Below about
elevation -17 m (-56 ft) soil stratification is generally
uniform across the site. Therefore, a single profile, profile A, can be used
for
the design of bearing pile foundations for the mooring dolphins and
bollards.
in Section 3.3
can
-11
TABLE 1
DESIGN SOIL PROFILES FOR WHARF REHABILITATION

Submerged Unit Weight (Pcf) 55 55
Profile Designation A
Stratum Description Loose to medium dense silty SAND Medium dense to very dense silty SAND, with gravel
Stratum Limits -9.5 to -13 m (-31 to -43 ft) -13 to -34 m (-43 to -112 ft)
Angle of Internal Friction 300 350
Loose to medium dense

silty SAND Medium dense to very dense silty SAND, with gravel
-9.5 to -17 m
(-31 to -56 ft) -17 to -34 m (-56 to -112 ft)
55
55
300
350
Loose to medium dense silty SAND Medium dense to very dense silty SAND, with gravel
-9.5 to -11 M (-31 to -36 ft) -11 to -34 m (-36 to -112 ft)
55
300 35
55
-12
The design
soil profiles developed from informnation obtained during the
additional site investigation are comparable to the soil
profile used for
preliminary design(l) in which the
transition between loose
to medium dense
sand and medium dense to very dense sand was
assumed to be at elevation -15 m
(-49 ft). Therefore, no
significant modifications
to the recommended
structure are anticipated.
For the entire length of the wharf,
the existing surface layer of very
soft silty clay and sandy silt should be removed by displacement or dredging,
and replaced with granular backfill. Removal and replacement of this material
is considered necessary to reduce lateral earth pressures
on the inboard side
of the sheetpile bulkhead,
and increase the passive soil resistence on the
outboard side.
Also, excessive settlement due to consolidation of these very
soft soils may cause overstressing of the bulkhead tie
rods, early
deterioration of surface pavement, and disruption of surface drainage systems.
Generally, the depth
of these very soft soils is less than 1 m (3 ft).
However, in the vicinity of berth 3 and the southwest portion of berth 2, tbs
silty clay extends to a depth of
as much as
3 m (10 ft) and is underlain by
very loose silty sand. In these areas dredging and replacement with granular
backfill will be required to a depth of 4 to 5 m
(13 to 16 ft).
Within the limits of soil profile C, where hard ground was encountered at
shallow depth, and possibly at other locations along the bulkhead alignment,
hard driving may be encountered during installation of the sheetpiling. To
achieve
the required sheetpile penetration in these
areas it may be necessary
to loosen the ground along the bulkhead alignment by pre-punching ahead of the
sheetpile installation.
-13
4.0
AGGREGATE SOURCE INVESTIGATION
4.1
General
A major consideration for the Port of Kismayo rehabilitation project

is
the availability of materials for construction, including fine aggregate,
coarse aggregate, and pavement base material. A previous
investigation,
discussed in Section 2, identified possible local
sources of fine aggregate,
but indicated that locally available quarry materials were unsuitable for use
as coarse aggregate for concrete, and were generally of
a poor quality for use
as pavement base material.
The primary purpose of the PBI investigation was
to search for sources of coarse aggregate and base materials in quarries other
than those previously investigated, if such new quarries could be located.
The PBI investigation included the following tasks:
o with Contractors and Government
Agencies. Interviews
were conducted with foreign contractors who are currently
or were
recently involved in construction projects in the Kismayo
area and
elsewhere in the southern part of the SDR to
determine the sources
aggregate materials used for their projects.
Somali
government agencies were
also contacted for information regarding
existing quarry sites in the Kismayo area.
o Visual Reconnaissance of
Local Quarries. A visual reconnaissance
was made of quarry sites previously investigated, and also of new
quarry sites located as
a result of interviews with contractors and
government agencies.
The visual reconnaissance was made to identify
the most promising quarry sites for which further exploration would
be performed.
o Quarry Investigation.
Bulk surface samples were obtained at several
Kismayo quarry
sites which were considered potential sources of
aggregate materials. Bulk samples
were also obtained at two sites
outside the Kismayo area for comparison with the local materials.
In addition, two borings were drilled at one quarry site.
of the Interviews
-14
Laboratory Testing. Laboratory testing

was performed on samples
obtained
from the quarry sites to evaluate the suitability of the
materials for use as
aggregate in construction.
Following is a detailed description of the above tasks and

a sumary of
the investigation findings.
4.2 Interviews with Contractors and Government Agencies
At the time the PBI investigation was conducted, three major construction
projects, directed by foreign contractors, were in progress in the Kismayo
vicinity. These projects included construction of cold storage facilities for
the Ministry of Fisheries, the Mugambo Irrigation Project,
and the Saco
Irrigation Project.
The Ministry of Fisheries project
includes the construction of several
cold storage facilities along the southern coast of the SDR to
serve as
temporary storage for fish being transported to a processing plant in Kismayo.
The facilities were designed by a West German firm, and construction is being
conducted by ARABCO Limited,
a Dutch firm. Coarse aggregate for the cold
storage facility in Kismayo is obtained from three quarry sites:
the Control
Point Quarry, Old Airport Quarry
and Sheikh Road Quarry. These quarries,
shown in the location plans of Plates 9 and 10, were
all identified during the
previous investigation. The Kismayo quarries were also the source of
coarse
aggregate for other cold storage facilities located along the coast south of
Kismayo. ARABCO officials were not aware of any quarries south of the Sheikh
Road Quarry which would
provide quality coarse aggregate material. Fine
aggregate for
the cold storage facility in Kismayo is obtained from beach sand
deposits from the Old Airport Quarry.
Water used for construction is obtained
from the Kismayo water supply system.
The Mugambo Irrigation Project, sponsored by the Ministry of Agriculture,
is located approximately 70 km north of Kismayo.
The project was designed by
a consulting firm from
the United Kingdom, and the construction contractors
are the German-Somalian Construction
and Trade Co., Ltd., and Buralhess, a
West German-Somalian joint venture
firm. Coarse aggregate used for concrete
for this project is obtained from the Old Airport Quarry.
Aggregate for base
-15
material is obtained from a quarry near

the town of Torda, approximately 20 km
southeast of the Juba River bridge to Gemama.
Fine aggregate is obtained from
beach sand deposits at
the Old Airport Quarry, and water is obtained from a
local well.
sponsored by the Ministry of
Agriculture, is located near Gelib, approximately 100 km north of Kismayo, and
is being constructed by a construction group from the People's Republic of
China. Coarse aggregate for this project is obtained from the Control Point
Quarry, and fine aggregate is obtained from the beach sand deposits at the Old
Airport Quarry.
The foreign contractors
were also helpful in providing information
regarding aggregate sources used for
recently completed construction projects
in the Kismayo vicinity.
It was reported that concrete coarse aggregate and
fine aggregate for the Juba Sugar Project north of Kismayo were obtained from
the Old Airport Quarry. Pavement base material for this project was
reported
to have been obtained from the same Torda Quarry being used for
the Mugambo
Irrigation Project. Pavement base material
for construction of the highway
linking Kismayo with Mogadishu was obtained from numerous sources including
an
inactive quarry, designated as the Highway Quarry for future reference, located on the east side of the highway approximately 8 km north of the Control Quarry. Somalian government agencies contacted for information regarding existing
quarries in the Kismayo area included the Ministry of Public Works, the
Ministry of Mineral and
Water Resources, the Somali Shipping Agency, the
Kismayo Security Office and
the Kismayo Port Directors Office. The quarry
sites identified during these interviews included only those which
had been
previously investigated. There was no information available on additional
quarry sites.
4.3 Additional Quarry Sites
The two additional quarry sites identified
during the interviews with
foreign contractors were the Torda Quarry and
the Highway Quarry. These
quarry sites are discussed below.
The Saca Irrigation Project, also
-16
Torda Quarry: The Torda Quarry is approximately 70 km from Kismayo,

including about 18 km of
rough coral surfaced road which is reported to be
impassable during rainy periods.
The rock available at the Torda Quarry is a
soft sandy, porous limestone,
which exhibits compressive strength noticeably lower
than material available
from the three quarries previously investigated. Rock from the Torda Quarry
generally fractured easily under the blow of a hammer, with fractured segments
producing fine sand sized particles. Voids in the
rock contain uncemented
loose
fine sand which flows freely when exposed. Stockpiles of the quarry
material contained a high percentage of sand, and it is likely that handling
and compaction of this material will cause additional degrading.
The Torda Quarry is considered an unsuitable source of aggregate for the
Port of Kismayo rehabilitation because of the long haul distance required, and
because the visual inspection of the available material indicated it to be of
poorer quality than material available from quarries near Kismayo.
For these
reasons, no further exploration was performed for this quarry.
Highway Quarry:
The Highway Quarry north of Kismayo contains materials
of highly
variable quality. The exposed quarry material is generally fine
sand and highly decomposed coral. A limited quantity of the quarry material
is composed of medium hard porous limestone, occurring as isolated boulders
outcropping from the decomposed coral.
Scattered stockpiles of these boulders
indicated
previous quarrying of this material. A visual inspection of the
limestone boulders indicated that the rock is of
a quality similar to that of
the porous limestone existing
at the three quarry sites previously
investigated.
However, because of the limited and uncertain quantity of this
material, and the anticipated higher quarrying cost to locate and excavate the
boulders,
the Highway Quarry is considered an inappropriate source for
aggregate. No further exploration was performed at this quarry.
4.4 Exploration Program
The visual reconnaissance of the additional quarry sites located during

this investigation failed to identify suitable new sources of coarse aggregate
for construction. Based on an
inspection of all local quarries, it is
-17
concluded that
the Check Point, Old Airport and Sheikh Road Quarries contain
the highest quality
aggregate material available in the Kismayo
area.
Although the previous investigation concluded that the materials
from these
quarries are unsuitable, the use of these
quarries for major construction
projects by foreign contractors indicated
that a reconsideration of the
previous conclusions was warranted.
Further exploration, described below, was
therefore performed at these quarry sites for the PBI investigation.
Bulk samples of crusher stockpile material were obtained at the Old
Airport Quarry and at
the Control Point Quarry, and designated as samples 2
and 4, respectively.
The sampling locations are shown in Plate 9.
For
comparison, additional samples
were
obtained from a quarry site at Mogadishu
and from the stockpile of a roadbuilding contractor
at Brava, designated as
samples 1 and 3, respectively. The stone use
by the contractor at Brava was
reportedly obtained from a quarry near Merca.
Laboratory L.A. abrasion tests
were performed on these samples for
correlation and comparison with
the
results of previous tests.
Additional bulk samples of
coarse aggregate, designated as
Q-1 through
Q-4, were obtained at the three Kismayo quarry sites,
but the results of the
laboratory tests performed on these samples were not available
at the time
this report was prepared.
These results will be presented in an addendum to
this report.
The additional site investigation also included
two borings, identified
as QB-l and QB-2, at the Control Point Quarry. The locations of these borings
are shown
in Plate 9. The Control Point
Quarry was selected for further
investigation since it is considered the most favorable source of coarse
aggregate of the
three local quarries.
The Control Point Quarry contains a
massive bed of limestone
which would be easier to quarry than the thin
limestone beds existing at the other
two quarries. Also, test results from
the previous investigation indicated
the materials from this quarry to
be
generally of better quality in comparison with the other quarry sites.
The
visual inspection of the Control Point Quarry indicated that the engineering
properties of the rock varied considerably within the quarry.
The additional
borings were performed to evaluate these variations in rock quality, and
hopefully allow a better estimate of typical conditions.
-18
The two quarry borings were drilled to a depth of approximately 8.0 m (26
ft) using a Radio Sonda SR2 trailer mounted drill rig. In general, a special
large diameter core barrel with a 146 mm (5.7 in.)
outside diameter was used
to obtain a 122 mm (4.8 in.) diameter core. In boring QB-2, an NWT
core
barrel with a 75 mm (2.9 in.) outside diameter was used to obtain a 59 mm (2.3 in.) diameter core below 4.7 m (15.4 ft) depth. The drilling equipment was switched to the smaller size core barrel in QB-2 to allow the borehole to be cased to the 4.7 m (15.4 ft) depth after problems with caving of the borehole were encountered. Core run lengths were 0.5 m (1.6 ft) in the upper portion of the borehole and were increased to 1.5
m (4.9 ft) at depth. A thin
bentonite slurry was circulated for the drill fluid. borings are presented in Appendix C.
Logs of the
quarry
The laboratory tests performed on samples

from borings QB-l included
L.A. abrasion, soundness (magnesium sulfate), specific unconfined compression, and water absorption
tests. The procedures the soundness test were revised
from the 10 cycle test performed
and QB-2
gravity,
used for
for the
previous investigation to
a 5 cycle test which is the commonly used test for
evaluating concrete coarse aggregate and pavement base material( 6
,7 ).
Laboratory testing for samples from borings QB-l and QB-2, and
bulk
samples Q-1 through Q-4, were performed by Central Testing Laboratories
Ltd. of Nairobi, Kenya. Laboratory testing for bulk samples 1 through 4 were
performed at the SDR Highway Department laboratory in Mogadishu. The results
of the laboratory tests are
presented in Appendix D, and summarized in
Table 2.
4.5 Results of Materials Testing
L.A. abrasion tests yielded 22.7 to 37 percent loss for

samples from the
Kismayo Control Point and Old
Airport Quarries. Generally a loss of 50
percent after 500 revolutions is the maximum acceptable for coarse
aggregate
for concrete or pavement base material( 6 ,7 ). Thus, the test results are
within the acceptable range.
The L.A. abrasion values obtained during this investigation are lower
than the values of 28 to 62 percent obtained during the previous
-19
TABLE 2 SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TESTING FOR QUARRY SAMPLES
L.A
Sample No. QB-1 Quarry Source Control Pt. Material Description Red-Brown Porous Coral Limestone Red-Brown Porous Coral Limestone 1 2 Mogadishu Old Airport Porous Coral Limestone Red-Brown Porous Coral Limestone Porous Coral Limestone Red-Brown Porous Coral Limestone 34.2 22.7 Abrasion 500 rev. (t) 37
MgSO4
Soundness 5 cycle (t) +No. 4 -No.4 1.4 3.3 Specific Gravity O.D. 2.37 S.S.D. 2.47 App. 2.62 Water Absorption 3.9
Fines (t
Passing No. 200 sieve) 1
Compression
Strengt kg/cm (psi) 157 (2230) 166 (2360)
Unconfined
QB-2 0
Control Pt.
33
1.2
4.0
2.36
2.46
2.62
4.1
3 4
Merca Control Pt.
29.7 26.4
investigation. investigation
A visual
inspection
of
the
samples
from
the
previous
indicated that a wider range of

materials were sampled and
tested.
The samples with the greatest abrasion loss were more porous and had
weaker structure. Samples comparable in quality
to those tested during this
investigation had abrasion loss ranging from 28 to 51 percent.
The higher abrasion loss values for
both investigations were obtained
from tests performed on
boring samples. Tests performed on crusher stockpile
material resulted in losses of
22.7 and 26.4 percent for this investigation,
and 28 and 29 percent for
the previous investigation.
These results indicate
that the quality
of the quarry material is improved by the quarrying and
crushing operations, which remove some of
the softer, less abrasion resistant
materials. These lower
values may therefore be more representative of the
abrasion characteristics of the locally available coarse aggregate material.
L.A. abrasion tests performed on coarse aggregate samples
from quarries
in Mogadishu and Merca resulted
in losses of 34.2 and 29.7 percent. These
values are within the range of values obtained for all Kismayo quarry samples,
but are higher than the values
obtained from tests
on comparable crusher
stockpile samples. This indicates
that
quarry materials available in the
Kismayo area are
of somewhat better
quality than the Mogadishu and Merca
materials.
These findings were anticipated by local engineers prior
to the
testing program. However, the limited
testing performed was insufficient to
reach any definite conclusions regarding the quality of aggregate from outside
the Kismayo area.
Magnesium sulfate soundness
tests (5 cycles) performed on rock samples
from borings QB-1 and QB-2 resulted in losses of 1.4
and 1.2 percent for
material larger than 5mm
(0.2 inch). Samples tested during the
previous
investigation using
a 10 cycle procedure had an average loss of
2.2 percent,
except that one
test pit sample had
a loss of 14.2 percent. Generally a loss
of 18 percent is the maximum acceptable for concrete coarse aggregate( 6 ).
The specific gravity tests performed on samples
from borings QB-I and
QB-2 resulted in G(oven-dry) of 2.37 and
2.36, I(saturated-surface-dry) of
2.47 and 2.46, and G(apparent)
of 2.62. The low oven-dry and saturated surface-dry values are indicative of the porous rock available
in the Kismayo
-21
The above specific gravity values are comparable to values obtained for
gravel and crusher stockpile material
tested during the previous
investigation. However,
tests on boring samples during the previous
investigation resulted in much lower values,
with oven-dry values of about
2.0, and saturated-surface-dry values of about
2.2. There is no standard
minimum value of specific gravity for coarse aggregate for concrete or
pavement base material.
Water absorption tests on
samples from borings QB-1 and QB-2 resulted in
absorption values of 3.9 and 4.1 percent.
These values are significantly
lower than
the values of 9.1 to 11.7 percent obtained for boring samples
tested during the previous investigation. There are no standard
maximum
values of water absorption for determining the suitability of coarse aggregate
for concrete. The suitability of concrete coarse aggregate with high water
absorption, or low specific gravity, is normally
evaluated by performing
concrete cylinder tests, and comparing the cylinder strengths obtained with
the minimum
strength required. Cylinder strength tests performed for the
recently completed Mogadishu Port expansion project resulted
in strengths of
356 to 398 kg/cm 2 (5000 to 5600 psi) using coarse aggregate from the Mogadishu
area of similar or poorer quality than that available in Kismayo. Specified
concrete strength for the Mogadishu Port expansion was 280 kg/cm 2 (4,000 psi).
Unconfined compression strength of rock core samples
from borings QB-l
and QB-2 were 157 and 166 kg/cm 2
(2230 and 2360 psi). These values indicate
that the intact rock has low compressive strength, which is typical of coral
limestone with porous structure.
4.6 Recommendations for Wharf Rehabilitation
4.6.1 Fine Aggregate for Concrete
area.
Recommendations for finu aggregate are based on data obtained during the
previous investigation( 2 ). That study found that the most suitable source of fine aggregate is the
beach sand deposit at the Old Airport Quarry.
Information obtained during
the additional site investigation indicates that
these beach sands are the source of fine aggregate for several major
construction projects presently in progress in the Kismayo area.
-22
It is recommended that these beach

sands be used for fine aggregate for
the Kismayo Port rehabilitation project. However, these beach sands must be
mixed with other materials, such as crushed quarry rock, to conform with ASTM
gradation requirements( 6 ). Also, since these beach sands have a high sulfate
content, it is recommended that they be washed with fresh water prior
to use
in construction.
4.6.2 Coarse Aggregate for Concrete
The coarse aggregate available from

local quarry sources meet standard
criteria for abrasion resistance and soundness. Compression tests on concrete
using comparable coarse aggregate materials indicate
that sufficient strength
can be obtained using these aggregates. Thus, considering abrasion
resistance, soundness and strength properties, the local quarry materials
are
acceptable for use as
concrete coarse aggregate.
There is a
concern, however, that the relatively low specific gravity and
high water
absorption properties of these materials may result in a more
porous concrete which may adversely affect the durability of the concrete in a

marine environment. There exist no standards
addressing specific gravity or
water absorption for coarse
aggregate. 8 Available information( , 9, 10, 11)
indicate that the specific gravity and
water absorption properties
of the
coarse aggregate do not have a significant influence on the durability of the
concrete. The more
important component from the standpoint of durability is
the quality of the cement paste surrounding the aggregate particles. The
specific gravity and water absorption characteristics of the aggregate are of
primary importance for determining the design mix. Aggregate of lower
specific gravity, and correspondingly higher water absorption,
typically
require increased water and cement quantities to compensate for water lost to
the aggregate. Adequate durability of concrete usually can
be obtained if the
concrete mix is proportioned to provide adequate strength.
Durability of the
concrete can be improved by 1) using admixtures to reduce the quantity of mix
water
and achieve a denser concrete, 2) using air entrainment to reduce the
water-cement ratio, 3) providing greater
cover of concrete over the
reinforcing bars (typically 50
to 75mm, 2 to 3 inches), or 4) applying
protective coating to the surface of the concrete.
-23
It is therefore concluded that locally available quarry material can be

used for concrete coarse aggregate, provided that some
of the above discussed
measures are employed to improve the durability of the concrete.
All three
Kismayo area quarries would be suitable sources of coarse
aggregate, but
materials used should be limited to
the denser coral limestone available from
these locations. The construction specifications should include abrasion
resistance and soundness requirexents to exclude unsuitable guarry material.
4.6.3 Since Pavement Base Material
locally
available quarry material meets the standard

abrasion
resistance and soundness requirements for soil-aggregate base material, it is
recommended that the local quarry material be used for pavement base
course
for the Kismayo Port rehabilitation project.
All three Kismayo area quarries
would be suitable sources of base material, but materials used should be
limited
to the denser coral limestone available from these locations. Also,
the base material gradation must be carefully specified to
assure a well
graded mixture for maximum compacted density.
-24
5.0 The previous
WATER SOURCE INVESTIGATION

which evaluated several potential
water
sources, suggested that the Juba River is a suitable source of water for
the
mixing of concrete during construction. However, further investigation was
considered necessary to evaluate the influence of tidal action on
the quality
of the river water. A water source investigation was therefore included in
the additional site investigation program to test and evaluate river water
samples obtained at various river Elow stages.
The water source
investigation, which is currently in progress, is described below.
For the current investigation, water samples were obtained from the Juba
River at the village of Gobuen, approximately 6 km from the mouth of the
river, and approximately 13 km north of Kismayo. Gobuen, which was also the
location the previous investigation, is easily
accessible by road, and is the closest location of the river to Kismayo.
Sample W-1, was obtained from the Kismayo Port water supply system which is treated river water from the village of Yantoy, located approximately 28 km north of Kismayo. Sample W-2 was obtained at Gobuen in November, 1983 when the river was at flood stage. Sample W-3 was obtained at Gobuen in January, 1984 when the river was at an intermediary stage. A third river sample will
be obtained in the future when the flow of the river is at
a low stage.
Laboratory testing of the water samples was performed by the University
of Nairobi Environmental Health Engineering Laboratory.
Tests performed
included determination of pH and concentration of chlorides, sulfates, total
dissolved solids and total suspended solids. The results of the
tests
completed to date are presented in Table 3.
The pH values for samples of untreated river water indicate that the
tested samples were slightly acidic to slightly alkaline. The values
obtained, 6.5 to 8.8, are acceptable for concrete mix water.
Measured sulfate concentrations ranged from 9 to 64 mg/L (1 mg/L = 1 part per million), with minimum and maximum values measured during flood conditions. The maximum concentration of sulfates normally considered of water
sampling for
investigation,
-25
TABLE 3
PRELIMINARY RESULTS OF WATER SAMPLE ANALYSES
Sample W-1 Parameters Date Sample Obtained pH Chlorides Sulfates Total Dissolved Solids Total Suspended Solids Total Solids
Kismayo Port
Sample W-2
Sample W-3
Water Supply (2) Nov. '83

7.5 58 16.5 184
76
260 (7.8) (98) (78)
Juba R. at Gobuen Juba R. at Gobuen
Flood Stage (3)

Interm. Stage
Nov. '83 7.7 (6.5) Jan.'84
8.8
146
44
3,460
2,000
5,460
40 (105)
9
688 187 875
(64)
Note: 1. All table values, except pH, are expressed in milligrams per liter. 1 mg/L = 1 part per million. 2. Values in parenthesis are test results from sample #4
obtained from Kismayo Port water supply during TAMS
investigation.
3. Values in parenthesis are test results from Sample #3
obtained from Juba River at Gobuen during TAMS investi gation, when river was at flood stage.
-26
acceptable for concrete is 1000 mg/L(1 2 ).

Measured chloride concentrations
ranged from 40 to 146 mg/L, with
the maximum value measured during an
intermediary river stage. The maximum concentration of chlorides normally
considered relatively acceptable narrow for of reinforced
concrete measured is 1000 mg/L(1 2 ). The
range sulfate
and chloride concentrations
indicate that the influence of tidal action is small.

Total solids measured in untreated river water was 875 and 5460 mg/L.
The higher value should be acceptable for concrete mix water, but concrete
cylinder tests should be conducted prior to
using this water in concrete to
assure that such high total solids content does not adversely affect concrete
strength.
The test data available to date indicate
that the Juba River is an
acceptable source of water for mixing
concrete. However, it is anticipated
that sulfate and chloride contents of the river water may increase during
periods of lowest flow when
tidal influence is greatest. Therefore,
conclusions can not be made regarding the suitability of untreated river water
for use in mixing concrete until water samples are obtained during lowest flow
conditions.
-27
6.0
WHARF TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY
The topographic survey performed for the

additional site investigation
included two tasks:
1) a surface survey of port facilities, and 2) soundings
beneath the existing pilc supported concrete platform.
The surface survey was performed by the licensed land surveyor
firm of
Hime and Zimmerlin of Mombasa, Kenya, under subcontract to Geodrill, Ltd. The
limits of the survey included the entire port facility commencing from the
south end of the approach causeway. The data obtained from the surface survey
will be presented in plans to be included in the final design
contract
documents.
The soundings beneath the wharf platform were
obtained to better define
the existing ground surface for more
accurately estimating construction backfill requirements. The soundings were obtained with the aid of divers provided by Geodrill, Ltd. Sounding profiles were obtained at existing pile bents at a spacing generally about 29 m (95 ft). Soundings were taken at each pile in the bent and referenced to the surface level of the outer edge of the wharf platform, which is at elevation +4.5 m (+14.8 ft). Profiles developed from these soundings are presented in Appendix E. The profiles indicate that
the lower portion of the existing slope surface is generally 1.0 to 1.5 m (3
to 5 ft) higher than the original design slope surface. Near the top of the
slope, however, the existing surface
drops sharply and, for a limited
distance, the existing surface is lower
than the original design slope
surface. In general, the sounding profiles
indicate that the existing slope
surface is higher than previously indicated, and that the quantity of backfill
previously estimated will therefore be significantly reduced.
-28
REFERENCES
1. Parsons, Brinckerhoff International, Inc., "Preliminary Design Report,

Rehabilitation of the Port of Kismayo, Somali Democratic Republic," Vol.
I and II, July 1983.
2. Tippetts-Abbett-McCarthy-Stratton, "Field Technical Surveys for Port of
Kismayo, Somali Democratic Republic," Vol. I and II, Feb. 1983.
3. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, "Port Facilities
- Phase I, Kisimaio,
Somalia, Design Analysis," Oct. 1961.
4. Osman, A.S., Farag, H.A.,
and Abdi, M.S., "Geology of Somalia," for SDR
Ministry of Mineral and Water Resources, 1976.
5. McClelland, B. "Design of Deep Penetration Piles for Ocean Structures,"
Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE, Vol. 100 No. GT7,
July 1974.
6. American Society for Testing and Materials, ASTM Standard C 33-82.
7. American Society for Testing and Materials, ASTM Standard D 1241-79.
8. American Concrete Institute, "Guide to Durable Concrete", ACI 201.2R-77
from ACI Manual of Concrete Practice, Part 1, 1982.
9. American Concrete Institute, "Selection and Use of Aggregates for
Concrete", ACI 221R-61 from ACI Manual of Concrete Practice, Part 1, 1982.
10. Freedman, S., "High-Strength Concrete", Portland Cement Assoxiation, 1971.
11. Kleiger, P.,
"High Strength Concrete", Portland Cement Association, Jan.
1973.
12. American Concrete Institute, "Recommendations for Design, Manufacture and
Installation of Concrete Piles", ACI Committee 543 from ACI Manual of
Concrete Practice, Part 3, 1974.
mA
Gu/f of Aden'
:ETHIOPIA,
"
KENYA
o,,.
jS
Omt
if\
Jaif/
I
,-.Casewy
Klsmaya Harbor
//
/!/
/ /
/ /
//
\ \da
'.--
1000
1500
0 Meters
1000
.2000
PORT OF KISMAYO REHABILITATION
LOCATION PLAN
PLATE I
r18.25 Pvement
r Pcast Dedc Panels
Hydraulic
r
Fqll ast In
3
Sections of Precast Pilo CapCati
'A
-
----
Elevation +4.3mr
e.G
o...
M.LW.S. Elevation
I!
Bulkhed Dike (Care Ston)
Plexdble Fndiir Rap System
I I
II
II II
I'
Bi
.n .1l- Bat
and
.nd .
II
.Originally
I":
andI Se iI I
ii
Ii
II
I
I
II
______I
Approximate
Existing Pvcfle
__s
j I
______,_o.
~edium Dense
S~d a 228 cm on Cantart
Ullee
48~
10
EXISTING WHARF STRUCTURE

PLATE 2
Fes of Existing Concrete Dock 15.25 m. Asphaltic Cone. Pavement

*f. ". ..
Fac of Bulkhead
Relocated
._ ....
:."
:
."...
.
.*
.-.
Elevation .. .. --. +4.5 m .

.
*. .**
wrs. t. =I.......
Uita .
Urs
Fonder System * Y.
Bulkhead
Shootidng
**
..
~Rods
U.a. **
re
-*.
*Oo
*.
nits of
:avation
ii
Bulkhead D1ke (care Ston*)

1.0 n
El. - 1.0 m
A4.
II
New Sand Fill
**.
.Exising
Piles
I '
,toe .. so* .
*
____________
I_ -
I t
i
_an
'
IOriginal
N.,i
" - Cut O ff Planned ~~Revot~n. nt at 1.0L..,ee 1.5 Slope
.'. ,
Lose
Silt
IA
I/Approximate
and Sand
-Existing
Praia"t Depth Elevation -g.
Profile
m1
/
Medium Dense
Silty Sand
8 Piles 48 cm x 48 Cm
SpaCed at 228 c, on Centers
#1l
S10
Meter
RECOMMENDED
REHABILITATION SCHEME
PLATE 3
WB -6
K-K K-I '4FCEO
IWB5 lI___HPPLTOM
-1
K-2 FACE OF EXISITINA WHARF PLATFORM 4
# -
ii._
BORINGLOCATION,
-
~~~~~~~K
NETGAIN
'
13SN
K- 3
~WB-2
I
-5
LEGEND:
LOCATION,BE B PRESENTGINVESTIGATION LOCATION,
A
OBORING
PREVIOUS INVESTIGATION
NOTES:
1.
FOR SOIL PROFILES A-A AND BPLATES 6 AND 7, RESPECTIVELI ALONG THE LENGTH OF THE WHARI BORINGS ARE LOCATED WITH RESPI EXISTING PILE BENTS. THE PILE BE CORRESPONDING TO EACH BORING LOCATION IS IDENTIFIED ON THE BORING LOGS.
SCALE:
s0
l00
150 METERS
PR
P R
FKSAORHBLT
KS A O R H B LT
LOCATION PLAN, WATER BORINGS

PI
J-21
J-22,
jJP
0
o
JP-20o
-2 16 JP-3 JP-4 Jp- 16 JP-0 JP-15.5 JP-15 0 JP-14.5 0 JPP147 JP-17 JB-19 JR- 18.5 0 JP-18 o
o E
.~
JP-6
JP-7JP-13.5 o
J12.5 0 0 JR-9 JPI
SWATER
SCALE
jET LOCATION
WHARFrPELATFLRTATION
POR
OFSTN
JE P
WROBE
0 cl
1.
FOR SOIL PROFILES A-A AND 8-8 PLATES 6 AND 7.
ENOTES:
SEE
N
. F
RESPECTIVELY.
WATER JET PROBES ARE LOCATED WITH RESPECT TO E :ISTING DENTS. THE PILE BENT CORRESPDONDING TO EACH PROBE LOCATION IS IDENTIFIED IN TABLE
S CALE:
051015 ME E SPORT OF KISMAYO REHA ILITATION
LOCATION PLAN,
WATER JET PROBINGS
PLATE 5
mn.............
..-.
II
It
-rO
-IT
So
-...
2a'
. _-
--
--
%,0.
.,a_.
_-----4 0
"43"
*0
' -,---
S So -
LIL
*K -
T lAI1InAII
-
-aI~mlMO
....-,c.
aC'C C,*,t.
co- S c
o,
SOI'T 00cr,
,s~r.
SaO~cOaS
rms3
"
..
.....
.+PORT
OF K:SMAYO REHABILITATION
MUMS
orSOIL aS fag,
PROFILE, SECTION A-A

PLATE 6
on ItA a. a. a. a
.
fj
nO CrO
T
__,.
I
_
.....
-"
_-_--
-in0
'l0,.
MM,
""
;i '
"' "PORT
OF KISMAYO REHABILITATION
SOIL PROFILE, SECTION B-B

PLATE 7
|oo,,
0
-3
(4 OF
DET -.---
.,,,o
-10n
w .,
A--A
" "'.
2-
=r
....
R9-0
'(
~l ~v
1
v%.TIN
20
l5.*i.. ~
FOR
, .... ......
FEoR
IE
~~~~~~~ 0W
*CS,205t.
a.A rg,*Ca
'ttes
GAA S .,*l 2
LWATE
l
E f oS gyW
l:lPR
IM
EHBLTTO -20
P
02
flPROFILEE o
TOPTaC~ ft G s mALAt FL AL S . DR ,t
tMTl
E~: PATT 7
OF0DIVIG
REORD
PMM -sa' AE
PROFILE OF DRIVING RECORDS FOR EXISTING FENDER PILES

PLATE 8
OLD AIRPORT QUARRY SITE

Q-2 n2
CONTROL Q U A RR Y SITEN
Ca IINDEAN
DI A N
LEG EN D:
QUARRY BORING KISMAY BAG SAMPLE
1000
500
1000
2000
K ISMAYO0Mt, HARBOR
KISMAYO ISLAND
PORT
LOCATION PLAN, NORTH. QUARRY SITES
PLATE 9 2)
PAE
SHEIKH ROAD QUARRY SITE
PR
INDIAN
OCEAN
LEGEND:
2
BAG SAMPLE
1000
S00
0 Meters
1000
2000
LOCATION PLAN, SOUTH QUARRY SITE

PLATE 10
APPENDIX A
LOGS OF WATER JET PROBINGS
BEfti" 3
OUTER
WAR'F
ER1
.uj
z z
To shore

PLAN OF EXISTING PILE BENTS
KS~'4vo ~e~d3/L~rr/o~W~t~l~> ORT

_______
PII)NGS
4Er /4r~~~~ Pr~~~e
PVT#
W04Tc.I
-VA5
t I - C~O& L ,o3~i
P R Rfl y
B~g~ 0OSMAT
P~~.
t~
,jL~i
~ S~LL.
______~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ______
A -~~2~tr-1.
5. W c
bQIi~___
AA
soA
____~~~~W ____ ____I
D
_ f7J
-m~v5
D__ _
__
AND___ _
M,
Z Aiv~r L
Iafl
fi E
Trrop4
Ll cTVzl
sO
Z rh,4
b NO
RA-D
ef
ArC 13r
I0
10
p
3Is
-8B~
/1.
E:0
lo .
________
79O
6,4r Z-/A
,*
5,9A/
KiSs41,'/o POqT 9EH,413,L~rAr1ON

He~re
M~oat plo.
WATER~ TET
~ ~
TF-rre
A 7dT WA TE F . AA4z!x P
Pf?OLIN6S mge
Per
__
plix 8&.,rP
AV.___
'ELNA1J
SoOTCrooThi.,AJLeo~
?AIOV
TFRP14->
,A
"A pi'
07 5-J5-
A.7c
9.LA -5. Al
Tp.ov
____l
-------------
90V
1W__5/1-__7
7.70
71.1 0
TVi
FC
9 7 ___________________ ___________________ ___________._____? so___________A L____
KISM,4vv1
PO/3T
9 f/A/3,1-r7r/OfN
-WTI~ER
-r F?OBN6S
re'3
PRoaE
p4o.
pJLx8(Aor
PA r
WA TEA
~prF
$j7e
o.MJSI~LT
1/.
/ 3
-.V /1Z,0 I
AJOm/i____/.-J 15 / 5 X-
1/
0...
iAlto
/1MW
.14.
_____
4-10:14-A/.3
_________ /I_____ oF
7So
e______ __5!______________________I&' ___el ____________________
_______,qt
Lt
PROBE i/O.
Pit-
scApT
W TEA
alF
HA
17~
-3
do 2 6Z /0
_____I
!5i
_____
T4
6
M.~t' Yf94 -
4/ A,'77
A f ' r 51t
j wC
'
Zo4- 1A V.__
~oi7__
/i3
1~J3
il,.-< ~~
D?~e
7-71e,4.T~2~//
17
~k/~10:3
3t74141A)'A
V.2ti
-250
__
AV>___ _
APPENDIX B
LOGS OF WATER BORINGS
PARSONS,BRINCKERHOFF, QUADE 8 DOUGLAS
BORING LOG
IECT ,,iz Yo _TON ____ _ ____Q---___AX rRACTOR c-7i . ,AL,

LER SWE-- N' ; ,C)L-F
I I
GROUND ELEVATION STATION
IBORING
9
NUMBE"-\
( )v,
,CIA
vet
RIG .P:1:\C( .1'T-y'E tAD. ECTOR C-t- 7)U J
-OD-fC
DRILLING START
DRILLING FINISH
OFFSET
TIME nD) DATEJIQ N[ 4 . TIMEQO, M DATE 12 Rb
QUANTITIES
,lNo ription
BORING
_.nA
Depth
D SHEAR STANDB
O
.
_
Hour
0
-GRe4Na--WATER DATA
Date
I N~j P
Remarks
SS
ntity
LF
EAI :E EA
TYPE
EAJ
E I
OF
SAMPLE
UNDISTURBED
SPLIT SPOON OD. 2;th2''

nmer weight
nrmer fall .. 3
PISTON O.D. .
I
0.0. IL.
..
DENISON
-.
LOCATION SKETCH
i IH C
,LJ
I.L.
CORE
BARREL TYPEID. . L 0.0 1. D.
%-
CASING
O . D I D
1,
,4,
NeighIof hammer
Hammer all SOIL -BLOWS OR HTD. PRESS.
'2.
cn!= W
!1:
5-
I SAMPLE
O0/6
6/12 -/
11,118
I
FIELD
" M:
IDENTIFICATION
"OF U.1"
CORING
RN
SOIL / ROCK
LI
e
I REG.
ROD
C)
MA
'
JI D
3.
/T
7__Irvm______M_____c__ I-.6.
' U Y A.
.-,
.F
, . .
: "L
/ 1
''~
'
2-
'" l'"'~ p. l l l
..
h .:" '." '~ 2,
.Og'P " r S.: *..: ,s
.t,.,,' ,:.. .
.
'" .:. .
"B
R N . '*
,,M -
S E T \ ,.
.F
I ,
'
2.. "
~.4
.IN
... . \ S 4
..
-~
PARSONS,BRINCKERHOFF,OUADE 8 DOUGLAS
BORING .OJECT
'CATION
LOG CONT'D
FBORING NUMBER UJ INSPECTOR C, 0-90 )J
kIcA4
A"'f
Pr---Ir' m''.L SOIL- BLOWS ORHYD.PRESS.
kI ', A--') SAMPLE
o E en
.
0/6T6/12 T1/Is 18/2

CL CORIN1
E ROD
FIELD OF
IDENTIFICATION SOIL /
ROCK
RUN
REG.
RU
R%
At L-EM)
- :JCM
7-(U4C
.3b ..
..
O . ;;
I..
e"4
npI 1 Nv"1_ _L_,
J I-
_____Z
Am
I~
TONQA _
jA
&
,..._z-Et
7.?K--u
t
8. w
~
____BRNG____________
---T ___~
1--.. -~ ~ ~ ~~
!Z.
-H~vp~f46jI
-
G
T.f-' ~
L/r.e4E
-.
~~~I ~
- II_~ -~bUS
.-H_.c9..5,r C~'~.r~
Akh
-8
4C113P -~
----
vI
poe,
*. .
..
...
.'
IDO
4, "-'
'-
..
PARSONS,BRINCKERHOFF,OUAV
"&
DOUGLAS
BORING
DJECT iSJ
-
LOG CONT'D
?g-T
CATION w
-C
RM I IROD R%/
1BORING NUMBER kj,.-
INSPECTOR.
__ -i <_ >,
C)RUN
--~~
SAMPLE
SOIL- BLOWS OR HYD.PRESS.
o.RUN-OF
cr
0/6 16/1T212 /18 18/2
CORING
REG.
FIELD
IDENTIFICATION SOIL /ROCK
"
,,)
.....
-?-_ _ _"
.'.
-)TIP
dI
~~
v-o"LV
'T I~..J.... nr P~ii tr-.' ei U-' s &hW
CokD.A\. is.~-
-T -~i6 -.--b-I
no
,t4 \N~-T, --. -'
rTL
t I
P. ..
,-.
Zn2.L.
I
i-2.______\IA
IS-C7
1-,04-t ___._
,7
BORIN S1~_ (%
N2L
4: 3EE -O
,
.*< .* **.*o.
*..r
.,.
*.
Kkc
PARSONS, BRI NCKERHOFF, OUADE S DOUGLAS
BORING
OJECT
*
,, __ .
LOG CONT'D
_"BORING
-
--
___________
____,__________-_
NUMBER
) -
)CATION -1\--\ ,
SAMPLE -Enz
J
8W , --
,AINSPECTOR
S.
-)U
KI
SOIL- BLOWS OR HYD. PRESS 0/6

I-a.
LJ
-
612 1218 18/2
FIELD
OF
IDENTIFICATION
SOIL / ROCK
* wU3
c.
--
CORING
RUN REG. RM
-1\4
R%
ROD
-_
-L
IiN
-4
(_
G-.
w To
tf,
4 - ,S
-"
h6_ ,o
I
-
1.
_,-1-1--
4'.
"
LJ
", U6
I/
"
-'
-A;7-
-)
-eL
i
________
D f? I L36
/___
18 -
y--
riIje-.
JI
NP
T4
/B
B R N
N.
-I
E TO
PARSONS, BRINCKERHOFF, QUADE S DOUGLAS
BORING
OJE CT
LOG
CONI'D
BORING NUMBER INSPECTOR ,o Z-Vl AJ
CATION
-81.0i tAA,
SAMPLE
4-SC.AAAL\ 1.2,
SOIL- BLOWS OR HYD. PRESS. 0/6
RU
WJ
-D
>-
6/12 12/18 18/2 REC. CORCLG
FIELD OF
IDENTIFICATION SOIL / ROCK
Lo
REG. RM
R%ROD
_//___
-r
tx&
SMEL
., IA
'
--
-7'
WT o -TO ('cf.
( . 2_ .-_ 1et"
.2
, If
-'-
-I,+
7-7.LOi
5117
. I_,
_ ___E'I
__
_ _ _ CcFL-
__
_____ _
-_ ____
_, _, OL __, Tr
_____\__
___ \_ LPC4 R
L......j/ p_
i
::o
liA
T)T2-\\)
(oL.4)
wF L'k T EI -'JA/ . rHc~/
I-
~dtJ ~ S
-
I I.
2 ti~s~.V~k
t..L~rcy1=2,_ pC o.} -~1-V i! C bE., MEv7(j
48-V-
CB t2-'--
I- I
,
-
""2' ___ ___

__
-4 iKI.
!
PE0____
___ -UAL.. f.Dt.ttSL2 "
"-I
.- L!c,A_ -' R S-- ' 1.-
LA~L:\-ibS:'A "
'm1_- &Tj
'b1L"
-4
_- _
_o _
r __,
__>oo
I_
--- iPPt 0
o\_J , T)_
nK7
7__,1,
PARSONS,BRINCKERHOFF,OUADE 5 DOUGLAS
BORING
)JECT
:ATION
TRACTOR
LLER S,
LOG
___'_
EIC
,I
.
t ,-"
fz LF"A
tU,-_
,() Mt .A,
GROUND ELEVATION
STATION
DR.L.L_
IBORING NUMBER U-)1-Z_

'?Te ,tW
OFFSET
.Vwy DATE..DATE
/
PE RIG Sit .. LU PECTOR ... .PT
DRILLING START
DRILLING FINISH
___A,
TIME 9'-'01M
TIME 2_-____
)ttA
-3,'.
,
s'vI
QUANTITIES
bm No
cription BORING SS P D =SHEAR STANDS
GRet"t#
Hour
".-
WATER DATA
J' p./.
Depth
I,<
Dote
Remarks
f.j, ,tl T,.
-O nt i t y
LF 1
EAA
A.
14IA
TYPE OF SAMPLE
UNDISTURBED
55
SPLIT SPOON
OD
2.
I.0 D
P ISTON 0. D.
-
fD
I
LOCATION SKETCH
;
DENISON 0.0.
I.D.
immer weight
mmer fall -
CORE
i D____
I
,.
L) >
BARREL TYPE 0.0. I.D.
CASING,
0.D.
it._
Weight of hommer
SAMPLE
C7ASI
>
D-
Hammer fall .,/

SOIL -BLOWS OR HTD. PRESS. 612 06 Z/I 1824 ECFIELD
1
OF
RRQD
--
1i
SOIL/
"
IDENTIFICATION
=z i--
.
0"
CRIN
ROCK
-'_-
c-,
RUN REG' RM
-'
" '
_ _ _
/, -2 '
oMN.iMc7tA'
I
$I'
1L;___
-.
(cit
_ _ _ _
T _5
I~
CA -.. LY .A'
RYZ-'" .T\TuiK "T'rcA.CH. ..

Alh:,
I ,
!
c
;I ,., I C.A\J d/ IJ ?,5',.-!or- '3 zS

.
' t
I o
tORING o I1,
0 \,I
.)
T Tc
PARSONS, BRI NCKERHOFF, QUADE & DOUGLAS
BORING
!OJECTDCATION
-j
LOG CONT'D
BORING NUMBER INSPECTOR > -R't-.

-
k4 ,I',M4Yr)
KI 6M V SAMPLE
Mf- t , 5S,/L% SOIL- BLOWS ORHYD. PRESS.
tu
=6/12112/lB11,2 /6
3.
RUN
CORINGREG. RM R% ROD
FIELD OF
IDENTIFICATION SOIL / ROCK AT" o,,'t )-.,TO
...
S 11 -1 ,.r, m" CJ,,-[Ut
-s
TIOP,
50PTo~A 00"TT
7tAC
T1_
14
r-V
rL
LQQ!,
S"
LI-rT T
T+
'ILA.--(. T E
-t9 IT r?-_
VA
.'s
__
"_ .
p L-a S- ,,If lPT0 '-If,47 6,zu-T

,
L0. SA'S Q
3
CJ-,r.A .L
.
.
-'N +r
$ILTL.I
5,L
A-
-T
Lu~nPToJV-r
-4CI76
-i{k~i
BORING~c N&%
/LSHEL
"
0~
-~(......__"arAL-":
.1
/4
':'.
t. h '
, q"
.:
,t ,t? +".J
" ,,:..,,
,
2"U
17
PARSONS, BRINCKERHOFF, QUADE a DOUGLAS
BORING
"OJECT -'5n 'b6M
OCATION : uSAMPLE IA //" SOIL- BLOWS ORHYD. PRESS
LOG CON'TD
INSPECTOR
EDGL 5 _
IBORING NUMBER Lu -Z... f?--DQU
m (n
U)O
0/6
RUN
6/1212/18 18/2REC.
REG. RM R%
IROD
__ _
FIELD
_ _ _ _
IDENTIFICATION
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
uii
0 m ui
17
1...
om
AUb..
1I-
_ _
_ _
D,
TuMu
ini
'
:_
_______
--
-c-tO-- -- ----
s[[
L...
1-
10
______NS
PARSONS, BRI NCKERHOFF, QUADE B DOUGLAS
BORING
)JECT
OCATION
ONTRACTOR 'RILLER 6:-. 1L L .-.-
LOG
FBrGROUND ELEVATION STATION
_ _._
'1,-
"
/XIAIORING
NUMBER W
I
_"
t.v's
;ftr-7
YPE RIG SlLLDQ -SPECTOR oop
OFFSET
DRILLING START DRILLING FINISH
TIME 10: "z(PMDATE!-S JV TIME L!O-ANDATE 25 NN\/
QUANTITIES
Item No
escriptionBORNGl 55
S
h D SHEAR STANDO
eReAt'
Hour 1A
WATER DATA
Remarks
I
I
A
Date
u .ntity
EA .
U
H!
i,
_
ja'2ov .
A'rq
....
TYPE OF SAMPLE
ss
SPLIT SPOON
O.D.
F PISTON .D.
I[
O.D.
I.D.
DENISON
I.D
ength Hammer weight o
DE NI
SKETCH LOCATION . ..
1:,'D1 f'
ommerL e foil
M.O, WCU
'-' -I-:-' 0.D
11 CORE BARREL TYPE
I'
D .
-
. ._3 -LX i '

-
/Z
! '
I
A: -3
'-,
-'-
JI .
'-
Weight of hammer SAPL-"

o
,'
"
ID
Hammer fall
I .
T-SOIL - BLOWS OR HTD. PRESS.

0/6 6/12 1I./18 118/2411EC:
08FIELD
IDENTIFICATION
3OI
RUN REG. RM R0 RD ROD_
_
OF
_
SOIL / ROCK
_ __--_
-~r?
,1r-A_t T,7
"TC
,R. F 15t), -r
ITG'fl
_
?
iE
I7TO)ATTrMPTs >
(r-
SAMFL,
AT
__ _
,_________,____
b=__TF ,J T
bZR-O w
__
__
SL SOC1I*
0F
OEET
PARSONS, BRINCKERHOFF, OUADE & DOUGLAS
,ORING
,3JECT OCATION <
SAMPLE
LOG
CONT'D
BORING NUMBER WT;.,.- S INSPECTOR.. i-I
1'r'
O2T T-.v'
/r,.
SOIL- BLOWS OR HYD.PRESS. CORNOF
.
-
SOIL
ROCK
,<
,-
La
LDa
RUN
&
REG. RM
Ig ,I IF-
R% ROD
..--- ,.
,3
. 3(
BIw~u) bEU5, -4.

tVAC,'7
ANb; mMo
2A/ C
IL-r pN> I
-";-".--___ ,(
I
4_'2AI
_ _
__
__
__
__
__
!3
__J
-il
11Ary
.!
DJ+IF AL)(le-E
TJ.
H-
- 4 C 1I
-o""
-1ET-
BOIN
_-I _-_i__
__
__
_iNG
NorT. '
iJ a
E_.
- __
_'
PARSONS, BRINCKERHOFF, OUADE S DOUGLAS
BORING
3OJE CT 1W\i/ 7 /p )CATION ki A -rO SAMPLE :D
:'z 10 o
m
-
LOG
CONTrD
BORING NUMBER INSPECTOR S'
"-3
(O_.jT
gO
: 0/6
AL--A
6/12 12/18 18/2 REC. CORING
Vf A)U0/Tz,
Cs-'ca L i
SOIL- BLOWS ORHYD. PRESS
FIELD OF
IDENTIFICATION
SOIL / ROCK
"
C.
Lui
(DRUN
REG.
RM
R% RQD
2Y.
-WR
LE
Iir-u0u-- 0. -M
2 o,-' .
14)P710 -
BORIGp &FvLtT . .H _
- K - -- ~ --j-_
__
__
--
__
__
-- II7
H-______
PARSONS,BRI NCKERHOFF,QUADE S DOUGLAS
BORING LOG
>)JECT
c-\A'-h
$.AA"r(
OCATION
AO(--T
.
10 /r,, l
\.,
GROUND ELEVATION
)NTRACTOR 6nB--1 tILLER -- 't' 'PE RIG PtL-frK
BORING NUMBER U R
M,
OFFSET
-H
IJ'
WNS
'
4t"5
STATION
SPECTOR .
Of!1 .'Lj
/i#h . C.STe"I-Z.Z
DR,. LING START

DRILLING FINISH
TIME -713LO4 DATE

TIME :oo DATE
.O #v
QUANTITIES emNo.
scription
uant it
BORING
SS P 0 EA
Depth
LA
SHEAR STANDB H A EA
__
Hour
C 0I
Ves
, WATER S -DrPrl Date Remarks
_ ____-__
TYPE OF SAMPLE
SS. SPLIT SPOON
0 D. O.D.
5/_1
_
UNDISTURBED PISTON
-
[DENISON
O.D.
I.D.
.
LOCATION SKETCH
i .
'_ '
_ _
ID.
rnngth_
4ommer weight ommer fall
--
1.D.
__
-jq
;
L
-
D-1
l
"
1 I
______.__0
CORE BARREL .YPE
0..2--
"
_. _v
,':
-
O. D. 7
_____________ -
CASING
1,D
-
#II
Al
i-+-,=-'
,.,
IL. I_______________
:
I
Weight of hammer
2t-Y )
Hammer fall
SAMPLE'
SOIL - BLOWS OR HTD. PRESS.

0/ 6
cnCLI"OF
CORING
6/12
12118 18/24
FIELD
IDENTIFICATION
SOIL I ROCK
R%/ ROD
LJ) V -1i
I.
RUN
REG.1 R M
cc: v) <i _-,) ' I I I

r____F ,
G.
r 62i , U 1
C.....i
.S
2
.1..
T ,
6T 1TS owt.4 L&j I
-'ti
a sz.hG',
2i
S~37 ze' 1 . m Z r,
_
1,1
L1&I.4-T &kt- N Nvla2 .f !\),N/se ~ ~ U~ A')JD -D. 5 A 1 L I"-T-, I -X7 (-T d rta A\JL
S
i I
1H1'
,, ' -,.c
-BORING. ,, .r
r>..... M
"'
.N,'
'
....
,:
"H
_ - ..
o..G BO
. . .
...
. 7
PARSON S,.BRINNCKERHOFF, QUADE & DOUGLAS
... "BORIIG .
iOJECT-
LOG. CON'ID
.
P\SYAAG ~o QT
BORING NUMBER.
)CTO
SAMPLE
S8A-LA
SOILBLOWSORHYD.IRESS
INSPECTOR
' FIELD OF
IV.~
.'
).*~sLi
..
-7
r,
C
Sa.m
6 /12112/18 18/2
CORING 0 RUN
IDENTIFICATION
'SOIL./
ROCK7,
.
-. t
"
., .j -..
REG.30RN
JR% ROD
S_/.4-
Z4___IR-9
-5rl
z.
w,
ir-r'
A-r-
Pm-
SA tA
-3
RM
....
b14A
I I'
1,N641 X
___
L7-r
IO~
~P
I~~
4...
7TI3
7-7T1E ~
,_e, ~
r.,r.e ~~L
PA~~
IQ,.ir .
I.r C2.A C sp
fI
4.
,.AJ m
ab
it
4 71
.
__._
_'
,S ,r
'V
1-8 4M
. '
3
-*
lHcomptrr..
,,, , I: "
..i..'
~~
... . ,".,
5p
" t . .
.,
,,
'.
"
KNG N= _
or
'. , 1''.V
PARSONS,BRI NCKERHOFF,OUADE a DOUGLAS
BORING
,OJECT
LOG .CONT'D.
IBORING
INSPECTOR ,
NUMBER
)CATION
i "z
.
K'ifl4-o Po''r KI "11'9l' S "/ ' R0 1. 112

SAMPLE SOIL- BLOWS ORNYD. PRESS
ie',- 4
ill E >r
-cc o , C)m
-J) L)
,n CL, ,
0m >-
0/6
L =) mRUN
6/12 1Z/.8 18/2

CORING CORING'
-
FIELD
-OF
SOIL
IDENTIFICATION / ROCK
REG.RM
R% ROD
!p '
l 3 6,
CI
L f2t 7 1
;d IL
More
--.
P1-Ylr7 FO
Boe.,
__
A1--TOE
_ _
4& f)/ 70__
1, -4C11
t - -S.ET
BORING
"
_-_ OF.!-'
PARSONS, BRI NCKERHOFF, OUADE 3 DOUGLAS
BORING LOG
NJECT
CATION )"6_541 '/oy
lkl5l"vo
0,f'7
_ [-______________ BORING NUMBER __"
INTRACTOR
!ILLER -5.
-500104 L/.P -0 /;,/e e44eL9 I~ h

Rot.F 6-.Md IE
1jk'- S7
GROUND ELEVATION
STATION
rpoa~'4S s4
OFFSET
_
'PE RIG
3PECTOR
DRILLING START
l -o
TIME /,o*o0)A1 DATEA4, tv 3
DRILLING FINISH
TIME
2) -t AM DATE 07 YVrn
QUANTITIES em No
'sCription BORING
uontity LF
Depth
SS
-
GROUND WATER DATA

Hour Dote Remarks
O: o ,t ?- M/
I 1"/0 'o "I 47TZ .. ,77/ '
"
P hA EA
0 EA
SHEAR STANDS OM A H
,Lom.gd,9r.,
TYPE OF SAMPLE
UNDISTURBED 0~
SPLIT SPOON
r% b,
P E. ' PISTON
ID
DENISON
,oI D.o 1%.D. ,, length

_____.__._
0.D.
O.0.
~~
lommer weight ommer fall
-" I.L.
CORE
BARREL TYPE
O.D.
I.L
I I.D.
D I
-[
LOCATION SKETCH 4I
b 4 I'
-IA (3 C "..-". [
._.'WL*
j
I
i
,I-_ .
CASING
D.
-7
Weight of hammer
Z.
_______ _________
____________
Hammer fall...2...
L II
OF
c)
SAMPLE
SOIL -BLOWS' OR HTD. PRESS. 2
/ 11/
FIELD FIEL DI
it
; ,-
Scz
>"
"CORING
-.
RM HR, Rm ! R ROD
____
A9Afro at- Fllfr_
S.".slfp
,p,{=~v?7
/1
i4
00
ol,.
ee~ok'rly,
.Xflve 14"iAI
IV-I
B1 oti' M1
' I
/ 7-
'BORING
No
SEET.L 0_
PARSONS,BR I NCKERHOFF, QUADE & DOUGLAS
BORING
).JE CT DCATION
L.j
LOG
CONT'D
BORING NUMBER $Ed,/ ',,,
Pv kJ65.mi~
SAMPLE
K)SIs,'/t,
v/7 , $
SOILBLOWS OR HYD. PRESS
INSPECTOR
A.
I
j C)-
S
'o
MCORIG
L
0/6D 6/21/b1/,C RUN REG RM R% ROD
OF
SOIL
IL
/ ROCK DETFCTO
_,I
-'-
---
t
_rL)
-_
_,,__
_1 t_
(,, _ ._ _
c_ '
r_
-.
Ai~.
pr-
TO
IAZ. l/>-rtA L
-.
zv
L6P
S I
/I
,.
LI:
,...
,_
_D_ L)_ _
-
S__ _
__ _ _ _IQt)_!S
~'
!-
K2 ,_
Cz#24\. L (CoT2. AL_ r
L~ep
I--
0 -4
--
-JUL
___BORING_________________
PARSONS,BRINCKERHOFF,QUADE 8 DOUGLAS
BORING
h.OJECT )CATION
LOG CONT'D
IBORING NUMBER
-4
A'-' .
Drz-r
-1
kvr3
AC/K-f,
SAMPLE
'AWL
INSPECTOR
___________
L
(n
SOIL- BLOWS OR HYD.PRESS

-0/6
M
(
n' )
-,
Lu
6/12 12/18 18/2
REC.
FIELD
OF
IDENTIFICATION
SOIL / ROCK
-,-,
CL
CORING
RUN REG. RM R%I RQD
cr
=_
-_P
t 'k
f--)
;C
- -
S
-0 -l_ T -'l~ N H A,
4.I
JJ
__I
__
~7
-
_1-C7
.~......
-
Hz____________
I___
OIG AT
________________________________________________________________________
_ _ _ _ _ ___________________________________________ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
SI_
-
,--~~~t.-
-4.____
.-
_________________________________________
"II" 4C1"18
BORING NO.t - SHEET.-.Z.o...
.,.
PARSONS, BRI NCKERHOFF, QUADE a DOUGLAS
BORING LOG
-"JECT.
'IfC >
.CATION Ik4__$M\A " ONTRACTOR $ ' 2. r) RILLER S. o4lF YPE RIG
4j-_
-,
/4LIA
oE GROUND ELEVATION STATION 44-S2U rot-.LL;
'l__
IBORING NUMBERL.,-7]
-
G-.
A
ow, l OFFSET
','S
7..,j
ISPECTOR
FlLe-b,)'
/.
4 T;ME II"IS ADATE2t, D\jO TIME P't DATEZ- LOV
QUANTITIES tern No
.cription BORING LF SS A P EA D EA SHEAR "TANDIB Hi
WATER
-VWW
.
P7#
Depth
A
_ _
Hour
/',j
Date
.
Remarks
uontit}
TYPE OF SAMPLE
__
_
__
__
_
SS
SPLIT SPOON
F
UNDISTURBED
0 D.
I"D ~ength
_
PISTON
El DENISON
0?2cp
_ _ _
O.D.
1.. .. CORE TYPE

-
0. D. I.D. IL
-
LOCATION
SKETCH
... 1L t
J
I
WHAF
rl
-Iommer weight
~mmer fall
39BARREL 0. D.
CASING
IYC
I. D.
____
66
...
K 1 of hammer [ Weight
SAMPLE
0
ID . . Hammer foil
0/6
t:t~~
FIELD
Lys;#
tt
r-I
+ __
SOIL -BLOWS OR HTD. PRESS.

6/12 1 /I 18/24 REC
IDENTIFICATION
LO CL '
iOF
Z
SOIL / ROCK
RUN IREG. IRM R% RQDg/
-z
I
II
,
tj~~aTx
r~MP T Ioi~$ AT7 DM'T F

;R:-t
~t Tv
&/
TLT r
-r.:
Jlp
tu
l' 5AW f*J-ro
teT Iu -o
APcb/JJ/
Z9 ea
A PA~4~i~ ~
Z7 i Z6
71A-ekcr S?(LT 1AU9 t , i OZL
tV~
"
TOh La~v4, PL5
___
i 4 IIC~M~AJk
i-t7L
dE.~)u.. I~A~~
OIN o~~(
L~,P~if'ALL IIA-A A~' -W-~/L - P'T:

R/C7
I~~~~~
PARSONS, BRI NCKERHOFF, QUADE a DOUGLAS
BORING
]OJECT " sl Ar '1i:/n PeR
.
LOG CONTD
NUMBER Z'
-
'-
"BORING
)CATION
= =-
lit$VV
yO
t SOIL- BLOWS ORHYD. PRESS.
INSPECTOR
. ofF
./
A, e*,,
rr-ec'
SAMPLE
u..0.. z
m a
0 -
, R oRUN
-3
ui
0/
RUN
/1
2181/2PC
FIELD OF
S I
IDENTIFICATION "/ R C
ROCK
CORING
.REG. RM.
SOILR% ROD
0 a
=Tu-
.Cl
Zv-eg
"Z
Ale
FR Wl
"-M
3
,jrr,
9 4
3q
L,16r[EROtUJvriY
&
0556
',_SP
).16mu D,
fA.=F_
jS,
'.bo
. -r ~
,-t
,,m ,o .,
''ol
-o a
,T
2,
--
tAxD ON1 Cj- jj-5

-tT?
.2:.,
-o.-.__ -
cm.. Po t--L
o4 , /
"
:!
-I
....
PA
,~/
L tiirW.4 :r~v
... -<I M
1- 710 -
eo
V 6R,
SA
tJ-Vr7
i.EJ'
PARSONS, BRINCKERHOFF, QUADE a DOUGLAS
BORING
LOG CONeD
IBORINGNUMBER
INSPECTOR ' ,,? 'J,
'JECT C-
,o f"'1,r-
1/50,!,,'yp , *CATION rr, 4cI4
SAMPLE SOIL- BLOWS ORHYD. PRESS
vj,
C.r ) !',
"r
a
I"
0/6
-
6/12112/1l818/21REc. ,
',,CORING
R%.RD
-3
,z=
,
_
FtELD OF
IDENTIFICATION
SOIL! ROCK
RUN .'REG. RM
7
' '
4-" .
~..,.:
/A-{r
emy wA46 f -51f.
,dV ,
-,
-.
*--2"L'
// *-1*IT ._I_"_'
'i"'
,
.ii.'
f~rbo.. Ll /Vf I I " ? _r A .'
L 1..1r
5Me
Z N.
.1
I7 I
I.
.*"
"
"--
'.=
'
"'
'I'
~
__~
K-7__ 1--7~
U1
, .I
.*ORIN., ::
..
.[.TT O-v,
-IB4C
L'.(
PARSONS, BRINCKERHOFF, QUADE & DOUGLAS

BORING
.)JET T~~-TB-ORING ~4AA~f) CATION
LIj
LOG
CON'rD
NUMBER
6ISACf
eOA114INSPECTOR
SO!L- BLOWS OR HYD. PRESS.
/c . <.(012EQUI FIELD
4$ 7 wj-I
L)SAMPLE
cmORING
=) _UU LA
0/6T6/21/8182
c)
>
OF
REG.
.-
IDENTIFICATION
SOIL /ROCK
mRU
RM
RRI
-u
--
-~,T
-3-RWAW &0AVL
17ZACE5
IA4rt;k
-~
~~
-L
~~~rl
-a iPtK A
'k
.WPke,
C4 -I Ph
641312
7?4-.ArJ
TOJ Crzk-
sr4-T sz!5
___LITL
tljT, T
ZIA
10, IT
A
f
-2_
I __
~ ~
- - I -~T
~ IM
~ IZL'0' I&iI ~A2 aoiJpr~r

______ _____
~
_____
SAJb
_____
isfTL
____
540~
/5 W
-
25
-r~r-
L4Cv7
611-r Lit-cM,
zwo
2 \Jt-z-r
o,
tI4T-rt, SAW~
srkIO& 4O:P
s!mcE
M.r
-r
-To
---4--ALA--
__-
\Yc-
SOpC.
Ll
MW1t> r---H
ID
18
4CISBORING
No.IL.13.. SMEECTII
OF...
PARSONS,BRI NCKERHOFF,QUADE S DOUGLAS
BORING
IDCATION AcAT
-j
LOG CONT'D
IBORING
INSPECTOR --,-UU NUMBER /TL, 6-.M
-(=I,
)JECT
-
k_-. A'f,, SAMPLE
PoC?_:T SO,,A ALA\, SOIL- BLOWS ORHYD. PRESS
"
_j 0 /6t"' U) uj
w
-RUN
6/T12 12/18 18/2 1wc.

COXI N
FIELD OF
IDENTIFICATION SOIL! ROCK
REG.
RM
R% ROD
-A)
NoD.Y-czaCa
4?OILK
__' _
,
-
-$3
~T(.A
~t)R
Sf VT(2OW&
sALT) -AT
:l.
.
__
$!
17
'e' ,Or L
4Tl4A
(PIrA&
NJ. I "H
"~
t..,D
-;C
-m
-,
4-5
30q
' I A
'
IrL
fiR
--
&1
4LNT)
sor
-- 1
-5A n
sn_
V~./~'I)
1 fA-Th rT f
e
1-_.
I
s
2~ '
OLI(M
17
4c.'18 -,8-
N2 S4-
.,ORING No2_
SHEET-'-
o...
I .0>
APPENDIX C
LOGS OF QUARRY BORINGS
PARSONS, BRINCKERHOFF, QUADE 8 DOUGLAS
BORING LOG
)JECT TRACTOR
LLER
_ ____ _ _ _)__
CGROUND
'EL5TO ,l
(.p -.
STATION
\,l,
ELEVATION
IBORING
NUMBER C '
'E RIG 1P, -OSD: PECTORS.() L--tuJ
JEJTEi-)JT" l 7"-
OFFSET
TIME qI L6 DATE.. TIME 3 :E'. / DATE '-DEt
QUANTITIES m No. scription BORING

uantity iF
SS P D SHEAR STANDB;
epth
EA EA EA
CND
H
GROUND WATER DATA Hour Dote Remarks
TYPE OF SAMPLE
s:] SPLIT SPOON 0 D.___,._._,._._
________
UNDISTURBED [ PISTON P
;aBNSN
0.D.
D.0
O.D.
I.0.
--
: !I I SKETCH i LOCATION J JI- Li -.
!ngth 3mmer weight immer foil

_II
I.L.
CORE_
I.L.
'
'.
BARREL TYPE
o.o. 147-M&
_____;_: L .D,
CASING
2
I
E
t...
1
__ _ __
,_
i
__
O D._
Weight of hammer
C>
_ ______-
ID,
Hammer foil
__________
i
FIELD IDENTIFICATION
SAMPLE
SOIL -BLOWS / /2I~I
OR HTD. PRESS. 82
c)
L ML I C: CLCORING
' RU IRU REGD.
H
OF
SOIL / ROCK
10,7
7,
-72-
C
C -.
k ObLZc)
'
r?- ,cr 0b C5-.
PA rZ-rJ-tVL
J _______
__c
-- ,
__LX
LI
_AQ
T,"LA"T,
__N_______
Tm--,
I2
,l,
- t)lO
2J-? I'p i LArl

. '74
~-umr-T) PT N .
jj. I '/2. 31
'),
______
,
I
I
~Imm)
IIVr
At -
tfL
'I
f6~p1uL)!0-
00o*-r-
CAcA-oIJAUM-
10 v\jti
-43--
-CI "-7 '
C2,11 .
.AOUGOA R&..
~pc
S LI jL
'
BORING No qa-L. SHEET.4,.,. OF
PARSONS, BRINCKERHOFF, OUADE a DOUGLAS
BORING
.ATION
Li
LOG CON'ID
IBORING NUMBER
___._
INSPECTOR
' l4)
SAMPLE
SOIL- BLOWS ORHYD. PRESS.
En
.. o.
n( -
0/6 SRUN
6/12112 /18 118/21 REC.

CORING
FIELD
OF
IDENTIFICATION
SOIL / ROCK
M--
"-A
REG.
RM
R%
ROD
-r-
/. q
-
I
4lOAr I
I
in
LcJ
L . ~-D~A
1~
/. -
"AU
M ACL UF/ ! :>
.7
cT
_X'
!/I.sr 2-
lO 12-I
_
-r
r71Lk~
Cc?
Lc<.
,.
.,,
AT )cF )u j_ QJ'.
/.2-_~c
' Wu I
I- -TU LLIr
=-L Wlt 4 -
/~
2_
_ _
6ZtAL
LmACs Ar- DrzjLL
A c7. 4_,
._ 1,0I
'.
(~70L
..
4. .,A. - 'T
.,P
1,T
.. ,_ ,,L .
-
3,01 5
r- C r.A ,'-\ ,,,--.i
L-,,'-..
.,, I
17870r
I-c-
-t
-. 4-io~i-.L-km
AT
ov
18 - 4CI73
BORING Noo
SHEET.
F.........
PARSONS, BRI NCKERHOFF, OUADE a DOUGLA,S
BORING LOG
CATION UILLER
"IJECT t
. I -70 'I NTRACTOR C.O
P
,4 ,.U L.,A IL L
,Y_
,3--
.
, ,
0(>,
STATION
k\*'
BORING NUMBER
OFFSET
GROUND GR UN ELEVATION LEV TIO
( PE RI G
SPECT OR f.. _,
\C )
5.
e='P
b
,
DRIL L ING STA RT

DRI L LING F IN ISH
TI ME 1 ,t
T IME
A .30 M DATE 2 , ) p ov
..
102 -N DA T E A _D1 -
QUANTITIES tam No
!scription BORING uantity F SS P D
' Depth
SHEAR
STAND
GROUND WATER 'DATA Hour Date Remarks
EA EA E t T YPE OF SAMP L E
PISTON
O___0.D. -
..
A
_
_ _
=L =_
UNDISTURBED SPLTLSOO
0 .D
ID DENISONH
O.D.
LOCATION
SKETCH L-
I D __.
Length
________ _
.
I. L.
-
L D .
IL , C ORE
: I
.
I
'
H a mme r weight - om me r f al l
BAR RE L T Y PE
I_
O.
.9---FIELD OF
__
" , ODI
Weight of hammer l-1
SAMPLE j
zno L-3
CA SIN G
#-
t
3,
.. ..
Hammer fall
SOIL -BLOWS OR HTD. PRESS. 0/6 6/12 12/I 18/24 R C

CL
a )
CO RIN G R% ROD
RUN IREGRM
7q
c"
"Do,__
-
Cr
Ib.
c,
\, HT
7 F M Di ri4 ?- i
;=j I-
L I
"
1~)90 -C 1 7 Z , ,' tc, i t . -
71 77 CZ, 5kiVI Al,cl
II I
CN
. cE BR
StH Ec. T% O F
A-217 ORINC No O S[T r[l
PARSONS, BRINCKERHOFF, QUADE & DOUGLAS
BORING
:)JECT &l )CATION .AI
' "
LOG CON''D
IBORING NUMBER
... p'l-rT P4\'r" L3

SOIL-
f[
,
SAMPLE
INSPECTOR
"0
BLOWS ORHYD. PRESS,
c
C)
0/6
oJ ,,=C
>3n-
CRN C OR I N G
U
6/12112/18 18/2 REC. .

R% ROD
FIELD OF
IDENTIFICATION
SOIL / ROCK
RUN7REG. R M
_1
,' e9
'3"
011&5 Ot7
'i4
SAMM.~~n-
S4~7L
____
-,
3,- ,
-,
o,,Oi ".0
t or
22 1 -, . Z
.1
1L
t.o S . ., ____________"____j-oD. _______.,_____________.
r'Tp.
. .UI
__________-
___- _
_ _7
__ __
--
,ruV-
r-I
I- t5b ,flb0,,t
OL
I2A 1,
L- o
-'
o-
-.
Yo__~
__---_
,
-~v
'bL
An
F O?
I~ha
V~ L
-
I
YA
ti
MM
c.IR
-I
-
~ ~
f-~
-I--~
I,
I
I(Q:
_
SAM,,
SA ~
_~
i
.02
L_
.
_
C It
_ _ _ _ _ _ __
I_
7~~2 77! 71- e,
C- 7
vo~1 AigA
As ci
-k
b-
m T-
v1-m---a
10S-4CI73
BORING NoX?_HET2
_F2L
APPENDIX D
LABORATORY TEST RESULTS
CTL
let. Client... .. ............... LIMITED GEODRILL . Location ... .
CEI:TF A It I ISTr
f 0 LC ;8so
LABDP/TORIES
lte 5--.2/23
Ltd.
,ISMYQ..,
eet.......,,
...
JobNo ...........
"
LII~TS "
SOIL TEST
~
....
ESuLiS SU14I,;/;t'%Y SHEET

C
75
Dote...i,
.... ....
~GRADI}:G
1. PASSINI
"
SV
I.E .
75LP63 50S37.S528 - 20 ..mm It. mm 10 mm 5.3 mm S & 2 w--__m mmmmmm 1 Sao 5o0 L2513l)0 150 I m mm- mm .. -.
-1 _
. B.R. V.I C C..R -- Ir*? -. E.oo. ... E iP.SfAK

II i.
STRENGTH TESTSIE_
U.
I .%
B.
SAMPLE
DECITO
lBS.
L99 I
-
t"
SI
-m
. .
.. -
.- rr -mm .mmb
--
--
'+"--'-T.
-+..... 1 m i
mI
5
/ml
w.
cap
1991
.S
.
- --
1..00 9 99
-- --..
98
97 95 ,
0.00.45 m
1.0-4. 5
_ ----------------------------
00 101-,T 98 100
98
_
97 97 9_
97
96
961 92 84 93 92
79 9 --
72 90
57 84
31 19 68 29 . . ._.
-_6.9in .-. - ...
370.-
14. 1 5r
35 15.
9 . 00 - 18 .4 5m
WB
1.
_a
...
.M
.0
9... 86 80
78
76 74
7171
70 63!
9.00-9.45m
-1945 IS 7
..-- ---
.1.
84-2.29
.07-52m
W00
2010_.2_
1952 7 "'-4-
_I9-
99
_7
- . -
JD _ 94 _D 1_
. 100 9 - _- -968
-.6-- -
- -"
17 I
4.
"
-E3
19
.6
_L4
8_,1.0 0 4 n m
--
_-
--
-..
3.n, 10
CTL
Client..
GEODRILL LIMITED
CENTRAL
TESTING
P S . lea 11501 Ii
LABORATORIES
1e t, I. l
l21
Ltd.
Job N
Loc tio n. .
L. A Y..... ... .... . ... . . . ....
SOIL TEST RESULTS

GRADING I
R A
SUMMARY SHEET
COMPACTION
'
D at e. ... a
1 _MS
PASSING h
600 500 &25 30015 5-$1 ij'. lam km rom
b-77, tn. )_ -m
__ -1
5
-
,20111 1o. mmm i ima - mm mMAmmmm

mm 63
so
S mm m m m
R A
FIELD
TPE
Mir. Co
_
STRENGTH TESTS
CIA[ .3 1 IA
a V
'
. . .
UC
SAMPLE
]Jm
.%
fe
DESCRIPTION
1 M.._____________
WB 6
2021
2022 5
S. 4 S. 8
-- -S.
100 98 92 O 85 73 70 68 63 56 4 9 48 46 _ _ 100 96 94 92 90 89 86 85 84 83 -81 100 98 95 93 92 91 89 87 82 77

979797 100 99 95 9 96 93 92 96 95 91 90 93
41 Z3
402 1.
15
-
7Z 35 20 67 39 17 20 41
3.50- 1 5.00.5.45m
1500 S. 45m
9. 50-9.95m
-
2028 sIT--0 TV
90189 8"848 7 88 87 8316
11 .00-14.45m 121.50-ZL 95m
2033 S. 16
89188
- -
- -
- -
- - -- - - -- -- - -
--
--
--
-
- - - - - - - -- -- - -- - - - - - ---- --
- - -
- - -
--
--
--
--
--
--
-- -- - - - - - - - -
- -
~~
CENT14L TL
CIIfLnt..G
iESIII:G
p C
lox
LABORATORIES
9427123
Ltd.
IS07 l el .
DL.L
MLTJgD.
..
Location.. KjsmAX . ................. Job No R
AGGREGATE
TEST RESULTS SUMMARY SHEET

WC OMPRESSIVE 2
Sheet N..o,.......
Dot e.... ........
AGNESI .A
STRENGTH N/mm
SOUNDNESS'/.
IV
SPECIFIC GRAVITY
MOM mm ,am 37.5 1.z553 rAI mm 28125 MIN MIN 201L10 mm mm MIT mm .35 s 1967 QBI
1.69 TO
..L~ 2-6111 mU PMm mm mm bm bm bm bm bm bm 0101 21301O

30 24 L.
__
50,
~CTED
37
CE
TDSIE CTED EV
.. SSD 0..IEV0.EP
. 37 "
2.47 2Z62 A
100 84
631 4836 32
18
14
1_
+5ina 16,4
15.4
.1.4
3.3
2- 77r
------
--
r.l
2.02 2.35
3.0316.6
1968
QRZ 0.05 TO 1.05n

34 6 62 i 1 _L 1 9 8 i.l. 7 5 Z 1 33
-tartx 17-L -5Z
16.3
4.0
. 62-46 2-62 4.-1; 01 2.34 -9 1
05
........ . .........

........
I ----------------
TL
CENTRAL
TESTING
BOX 18507
LABORATORIES
TEL. 559422123
LTD.
P.O.
NA IROBI.
I5otopic No.
PARTICLE ILocation
IQ42KISM
tIM Decito1fSm
Desripion f S
SIZE
DISTRIBUTION
mple
,V /2/
S Z/
1. 95-2o.1~
B.S.
METRIC
SIEVES
E i
E
0
C40
FEE E n0 C)
400
EE
.
= E.EE
,oEE
in "-?,. , > a i inL,
E EE
0
E EE eEeEEer
-,V.; 6
"u 00
0 -i . CQU, 6
I
, _
lii
i-A- 10a
._____ .
..
-I .
1
~
-
HHF.I
L
96
60--7
Wi
5050
.,."
I4il
60
40
LL:
4-
40
202
*.I-
-30
o F4.e Si
*, ,,t
jcor':.rs!.Sitt Fi
_
n 5SaTd
i,, ..
....... L .. ":..
I--it [I
C diu n.. .. _
Coor's -_j.
Lii
CENTRAL TESTING
P.O. BOX 18507
LABORATORIES
TEL. 559422123
LTD.
NA IROBI.
PARTICLE
SIZE
[Sample
DISTRIBUTION
of Scmple
FL C ? : _Q coo :F Eh E C- E EE
0 0 u C?
NO.1 9 4
L ocation KISMAX'O
JDescription
E -E
aAM/onnn
f E EE I
ooo
B.S.
METRIC
SIEVES
"-
EL z q ;I f-) 0 o
E C :E
o o
-EC L-EEE E 1: Eo O'

ui o o
IT 100
90.90
80
,W S7o-0
80
of-i
__..
J l
7o 70--"~
63
60
D 50
40 cr__ -30
--
50
-30
40
20
10
20
10
0 0
C y
i.S
lt
M du
o..tF
n'
dFill,
Sand
G... toe 1 1?orse I
le din Grcivmt
Gravel
TEST. No. ABRASION LOS ANGELES TEST
0ate1,/2-
TEST3iG METHOD: 'A ST'M

TEST FOR:
C 131 &
535 Required C < 50%._ 40, 35% 35D

5%
D coarse Aggregate
C- Base Roads =1 Surface Dressing ROCKS, ROCKFTlLS & FILTERS U Materials of Types 1,11,111, V, VI & VII
0) Material of Type IV
GRADING ,3_,__
'
Weight Passing 3
2
and
grading weight
of
test sample
spheres .revolutions
.__
Retained
1/22"
,.
I2"
it/" 3/41.
I"
3/41L 11"
'2"_
"_
_ _ _ _ _ __/2 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
2 oo
_
"_
___o
3/8,"
'
"
No.4(4.75 mm)
.
1/4"No.4-4.75mm
No..8.(2. 36 mm)-
.
I_______==_=,_=,
__
Total weight
W
=
5000 G'
=
_
Weight of material coarser than no. 12 sieve W /

/ w-w
/0
_9
Los Angeles Coefficient
C =100 W-W.
LOCATIONS
OF
CORRESPONDING
WORKS
AND REA.RKS
b4O6ADh514Q
-SJMPL)
ABRASI o
LOS ANI=IAS TESTI G METHOD:
TEST FOR:
coarse Aggregate E-- Base Roads CZJ Surface Dressing ROCKS, ROCFIi & FILTERS
C3 Materials of Types I,II,III, V, VI & VII 0 Material of Type IV GRADINGf _ .
2 Date 90- 2-93

TEST No.
TEST
A S TM
C 131 & 535
Reouired C
571 40%
35%
_ 50 501
Weight Passi 311.. 2 112" 2," 1 1/2"1 . Retained 2 1/2".

1
1 1/2" 1"
and
grading weight
of
test sample
spheres revolutions
2"
...
3/4
./'"
'
...
..... ' 2_
_ _i"0,0_
_7_11
3/8"
No.4-4. 5
1/" No.4(4.75 mm)

No.8(2.36 mm) - .
1/4...
Total weight
__.............
5,o, _ 3693
G.r.
/ Weight of mateiial coarser than no. 12 sieve W
C -100 W-W4
j oCATIONS
OF COR]RESPONDING
WORKS
AND RPIAM
oLD 41
01Z7 -.
45A1/yu SAP 4PL E/
A B R A"S : 0 N
LOS ANGLES TEST
TEST No.
Date.20-12.
'
TESTING METHOD:
TEST FOR:
AS TM C 131 &
535
....
iReauired C
Coarse Aggregate
<-
52%_
CI
E
Base
Roads
40%35%
Surface Dressing
ROCKS, ROCKFILS & FILTERS CJ Materials of Types I,IIIII, V, VI & VII 0 Material of Type IV
GRADING
_ _,
<' IA
5-016 5091 ..
Weight Passing Retained 2 1/2" 2"
and
grading weight
of
test sample
spheres revolutions
__
2 1/2" 2"-_... ...
1
__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _I__ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
____ __/_".
1 1/21
3/4"
li.. , 1___/2"
'
1/21
3/811
... . .
3/811
1/4"
1/411,:
No.4(4.75
No.8.(2.36
_ ._
.2
..
..... _..
.____......._
_/_,,__ ,.__1___
___
mm)
mm)- L
No.4-4.7,5mm
'
.__
Total weight
W / Weight of. material coarser than no. 12 sieve w

L0.CATIONS. OF _CORRESPONDING
S0 O 6r-.
35/6
C -100 W-4
WORKS_.AND_ .REMARKS
VEI
AES W W
"
SAMPL-5
ABRASION
;LOS ANGEIES TESTING METHOD: TEST FOR:
A S T M C 131 535
TEST
TEST No.
Date
Coarse Aggregate C- Base
1J
Roads
Required
C 59% 40%
EM
0 0 GRADING
Surface Dressing (3524 ROCKS, ROCKFILLS & FILTERS

Materials of Types l,II,Ill, V, VI & VII
Material of Type IV 5,
C.0 .
Weight Passing 3" 2 1/2"

11
and
grading weight .'
of
test sample
spheres revolutions
Retained
2 1/211 2"
2" 11',2"
3/4"
1/2"1/2 1"__
/.1.
...
__
3 /8"' 1/411
_1/4
3 /_
1/2.a"_ "
No_.4(_..75
, .
_ .
_.
_ _
_ _
__
___ _ __'
No.4-4.75mm
No.8(2.36 mm)
Total weight
,
-
50,C, 6r'
3 4
Weight of material coarser than no. 12 sieve W
G -100 W-W/'
,/
LOCATIONS
OF
CORRESPONDING
WORKS
AND RIAS
IT oSA124
APPENDIX E
PROFILES FROM SOUNDINGS BENEATH WHARF PLATFORM
BERTH 3
OUTER
WHARF
BER
'.
To shore

PLAN OF EXISTING PILE BENTS
Bltm
IM Computation Sheet
/B 3'
Made
oL.
-
,
el
Subject _K L 3__IASubec Y.._. .-f~i~iy'e f o ,,f
Dot.-,,, Checked by-
Date -----
Date----------
n~ %
LO
'ShfliE~ fX0OV~
T7VA4
f-j CCA
5"1
70
6,foa/,m)
sc'joffra
DtT/
/we-
k/V4TEd
-r&4tj59(
Se,g)/vS
47-
YcA
Ir
I~
/ ja
7:.z A
,4
. 71-o
4
.tz
4.,
?.*r
),7 I.oo z.4v /. '

z ,+ ,1 I
loft"A? IO: 3,IO
/42
17/
-A
55'
.3 7.S 3 o . t 3.3 .6 /,s
7,0 8
,o
417 z." /,47 z.7 3OO 2.57 Z.5 147- 10 3.?- z.i o 1o 3.6e Z-,7-0
/.XT 1,4-3
EC.3 s,
,,
"
14-7
34 t6 /0:o07
3 Z6a~ 11,3
~
,I
0.
__
75
~~~~
6.~2
-5
O 4-,
3.I
/ z
I
__
I.25 *
.402 .1---80,0
'I
I acr g II
_____
J/O:g~37 .4
-3
7.o &r
3 ,7/5 /.(o *,15-;?

,0*0.. loI9430-971-79 -Z
i,ao0
.-
3
.o111
/.'0
I I
98~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-"Awe
PC'e,(
SC'd
OU/ZW-
q/?'Mz
(4)
_
I
I
il1 . /2-
4-
__
7 o
//:i;2
.
z.cqo
7/7 7.5-0
, 1
3,4o
3.
Z./O , zR3
/,4S ?a1
/0 ,
/.zo
i,
I'o 7- Z
?,go
5-4704o
"0
571 4-3
/Z?0?-~ p Z' 2 z-
,,,
?,60 o
-94,- 7.o, 7Z-4
;77-
-3,oe .4
1,3 3 r*
I
e'?So 7Z5
-o
5-9-7 4-,OZ.
zRO
Al
/-7
*/e3
I
p~~~L
ZAZ 7 .1 7 4- 5 ia
- 341
z
1,70
I L
OL.
)*7 z4z7-
46 6
V4 4.-
),qo 36
/77
4
7,
-7.47
-4.o 6
--
-C.zz.
-4-,7 -z,s--
SZ..
,
/.z
-o./7
1 ,.4-o
9-/,0'2
t3,o'-
"
/7/ i 3
-7,67-
-6,37
-4-."I
-3.1z.-
.z.-
-o,o -0o,V .4 - o
Z,?7 -, o + .I
iN~~0
IN 0
-' . q
- 3-.? - 1,5 7
97- - 0,3 z- c/,
- -o
.. z - t/.,3 -2
,
Ix
(~
IZ
//.
-6.31
-5-.Zl
-,
-4-.t/ -3-31
-3 3
I;
-2,33I
o~,
oI -
zo4
3 o
I a
-/,37
'7 -7 3? -I.f4 - 4. 7 # .s .7
-I ' .ok / // .-, ,)7, - ./ -:
I%
'"
- i .7 6
-J;~
J94 4, -1 Z~ 61.1 -
o.o & t . -4- 1 tZ-.?7 1 t3 , I.Z
^At-LcWrtS
Z
-3,-4
75e
Z,3? -124 4-17

-/g '. O -,.gZo -,z -',?-0
.e,-
7-
'0? ' 4I 1-67 R6T 13.
%4 -;
- .?
-G.c/ZL
- ,7,s7
-
4-,oz.
-7.7+ -3.,2.
-o,O
fS-/-.-z-I.
7 -. 93,07
-3,o03
)"--,0-
,0 o
--
- 7. 06 - . -3 - 90.?o -z &-/ -7.7 e - . 63 Ze -3,'Fo - ,

-
- o;3-, -o. f-
z-.7 ,-3 o5
.- ,-.
l-l,
- . - o, 7
-o.O7
"
)-o,.'4-
-7,34-
-!9Z' 3a"~ ~
~ ~
-f-.97
~
-3.H- -/,?o
*3.17
~~~~~~~t -.z-..7-.-..g--.--,o..-o.7o
z..54-. 7'
-,o f--i 3,o
-.
S, -3 . .- .3 ,97 -Z,-64
-0,77
-o,5-7
-0o,/L
,,
I I
-7,.4-7
-7. 6
- ,,74- - - .g-5'c ,
-1.?o
-F.
-o, eT.. -o4-o -z. 3Z. &- -/./ - -.
i! '
h,15-I
-,
-53.113
97 +
[-
I L
r7.
-L
...
ES C.-
&
'
. . .
Ri
TAL
"
4.
.
. ..
" "- L:
EL
.
V.
1.
I
!i
K .
.. ::
.....
.- ,
-..1: *,
I
"
....
"L-"S
ELEV. 0.0
+'1
.
.
**L..
l T
..
..
.i.
.1.
iT/N-
SOP
4f
. .
K7
,
-PE
ic
3,
;..1
........
7...
-7"" ........
LL
...
. .
.. . ..
7PILES.
. .
2.2&M
_*1'__
.. . .
.. ... ...... :
_._
-":e.
- - -
.:
1.
5
.
',
.V.
: '.
-'
. ..
E L. +1
-iLL\__
"
..
__
__
.E
'
+.
"
ILws ELEV. E" 0.0
.n
UIN
...
,.
i .
. ..
. .
"
" "
...
7:
..
. ...
....-..
;
, ..
I,
-1
.
.
"..
.
.
I
,
_______7 :: 1:.... ... .1
PI LE:S.CG2."&tl
-_.,: ._ -- .-_.. -__._... . __ ._
5 .'.
... ........ .__._

___..
l l
..
.. . .. ..
... .. ....
.
I.
-4. --I
..
"7LWS E'LEV. 0.0
. .
. .
..
.
4
*tI
.
...
. . --... . .
...
..
: ....
....
..
. .I
I"
---.
"" ~~~~~......... ... ............. "... ....

-3 .
..
... I...
i,
T%
'"
"l
:-.
-... ..
.
.
..
..
. .
*
. ..
. .
._.
_-_..
7 P LE :
_ " t 2 ._. . ....
-I
__
"-1 ...
. .
:I
-7-",.... " ij5
. .. EL V
4 - . 7....
St
..
....
*"LwS
ELEV.
0.0
1
CO
-..
..
.--. ....
.... ..
: ,
1
.
SI.
2-.
.a.
. .
....
, .r.
..
'.
fl . T[ - H -
i __ f . . .. .
". . , _.-....
.:j,! I.
.
.
....
Ia..
" .- '. 2
ii . ... :: ...
-1.
a..
.. ..
.,-..
...
...
. .
... a'
..
I*I
"a..-
..
.
I
S
. .
"1 .-
.. I
.:
..
. .
i,.-
.:..
* ..
. . : 1
' ..
I
.
..............
I
,
. ..
I.
,.
..
" ;
... .:
...
1.1.
".
I
~~~.......... ...................-.
*.-
* .ii
-",
.5
I..
ALL
4 :"
, ~~~~~~..............................................
. . ..
I r....
I:
9-6... .... ..
.~. .. 1a57
.!.,
.
.
..
".
*."
..
:.!
. .".
....
__ __
"
.. .... ...... II
EL&V.t41.5
I."I
!.....
I .-..
.K
'
.... . ... .. . ..... .
...............
....
-f ...
.'
VHJ~LWS ELEV. 0.0
"i
'
"
"44
-: ..
t ', . .
! " .!:
..
..
. .
, IN
::i
"
"..............
....
...
....
...
..
.. I .. "I
...
LES ....
,
P
2.28'M .4 . ....
"
. I. I
.. . ...i
...... . . .
t
4r I1
"
_ :._.
___.
.. .. "
'l: ..
; /5 6I1
. . . .
'
" :'I.
.
--. . .. .. .
t-
-"
'
F-!-
-...
.. . .V ..
E.
"--
3..
i~
'~HLWS:
ELEV. 0.0
...
./
4
CA) ,,:. -
',
:
[
1.
...
.
"i
I ', .:.
......
. .I
: .
i .
..
i .. . .E
7"
2.2U
..
I-.-.
...
. *' .
............. .
.."_
.., .
-__'_
EL&V.
... .....
......
....
;6U
I.
. .
. . . .
LWS
ELEV. 0.0
*
*
. .
. .
.... Ir
I
4.
I . ..
....................
. .
-6
...
I.
: I.
11
. .
- .
......
r1-
..
t-
!..
. ._-_._
.
-
7.P.L.ES..2.2
__
_;_"
o - i
--.
* ..
......
..
I. .
.. . ... ......
, ..
:..
,
...
<
~71LSE*LEV. 0.0
. . .
1
. I
.:....,.
... '
.
"
[.N
'. ..
~i..
' ."I
"i.....
*
.
I
I~~
_ .
1'..
1 ... .. ,-i
_ _-'S
. : I1 PI LES;,A,2.28r3l
.. ... P m
* ITI
: : : .-... ....
.
-.
.-,
.. ...
.6
..... .. ... . . .i
..
'. . ..
EL V
7H1LWS ELEV. 0.0

. . . .
I
J
:i :.
. ...
" !.. .. ..
. . I'
..
, *.
.. .
II
..
.. .
.. .
.. .
..
..
..
"
..
-.
. ,
, ..
...
. . .,
*.
"""I -
. ...i.: . . . .... ;: i "

t
: ' :: l " . 7PILr-s. . . : :I" '' : -- 4;-...
a"2 T W '
. . ...
.. .
.
2.. ... ... 7:::1
.
.. t"
! .. ..
4.
17
1. ......
..
. ..
-.
I
.*
N
... .
'
, . ..
. -
. .
..
.". .... .
.. I
. . .
"*
..
- ...
.
,..... ..... ....

. .
I
.....
/.
'I""\
- .
.......
"-'"t"L . . . '. L " .. : .':. ..
...... :;,"
:.1.
I__ __ ::___ _-__

IELEV.
_"
+4.5
t,
k...
..
'"..
V," ELEV. 0.0
. . . ...
i
" 1
..
I" ..
' "
..
.I.:"
.:
' I '
.,,
L .
*
I . ... . "" . .
."
-_
t4.
. .
..
. .,
..
5 - _! ..
..-. _ ... .
E L V. +4.5
"
OD.
....
.
7LWS ELEV. 0.0
L*
[
. . ..
Ii
.
: .....
.
...
..
.i
,"I
. I
I-..
I ...
....
". --
- .
...
"
"-.
:. .
.
....... '....... . ........ ..... . ... . . ... .I .. ................
. .
.. ..
. .
..
. ...... .
. I . !
..
. ..
..
7I
PILE
. .. ..
..
..
,1......
.. .
E
I
....
....
...
...
*..:
"
r..
... . .....
..
e .--
.1'
.......
___LWS
ELEV. 0.0
.- .
*.
.v...
- '*
"... ........
.... -.....
..
-..
' :--
..
,......
00
..
. ... E
..
-.
...-
._-
..
-I
.4..........
.......
... 2
........
... . ...... 1I..'i

.
__ _ __ _
..
0.0
...
. ... .
. ..I
"
:. .
.:
" . ..
"4.
*1*
I
:
I""
1
I. . . ..
'..
. .
. .. ~7JIL SE'LEV.
..
-T--
II
;
....
. .. . .
I-=
_
--.
i
.
T"
. . .
I
.N
. .-
...
,
1,.
.
."
:::
-. .........................
.I
!
, . . . i .-..
::
h T ::LL
4:.
t~~
". . . ! . .. .". .. . . . . . . .. . .. .. ~1' 1":m I..-....... :.7 1P'

i:I
.,
.i . : P IL E 5:C"2
: '~6
.:T.....I
: -:I
.....
....
.. .:
L " . ....
_____I::....,
,E L ,V . t .4. 5
-.
'I
'
.. ... .... .......

....-...
... .........
........
...
..
' 'I"
I!
j.;.
.
" I.
. .... .
.
..
.L-iS
ELEV. 0.0
.. ... . . . . . . . . ...
4
,. . -
'
7
":
. .
. ..
..
. .
..
..
"
,
, [
,..,: r
.-..... I .
,,
.~
Ull
. . .
,I .. .
I ...........
*....
,.
.~
..
.. ........
95
..
..
.5
." ....
. .. ..
.
..
....... .
.. t
.. .
.
........j.... ..........
...
..
.
.
...
. .
"1
. . ....
__________ ____________
..
..
"'':. 2
7PILE5'
4TA[t
-jiIt
/
:
.
.. -
4T . ...
i-.
":-iI-...
| ..
....
.
..
"1
1.
........
..
..
.....
-.
I..I . ..... ."I " ." ..
1. . .
",
,0.
JI1 ws
C,.
..
..
.'t
...
1..
.....
..
1. .. .
. .I
I. . .:~
"."',-.. . .
. .
I.-
" ' ....

. ..
. ...
/. .
- ....
., .
4.....
,-
I " "
..
:.....
. . .....
.
I..
-'
..
..
..
; ":"
-4l
"1 ..
..
I:3,
TL
..
..
:
[-N.....
1: !..
___..,.
.:
., , ..
,7PILES~2.
__"_______________'_'__.. ...
..... I
777.I
. . . . . . .,
.
.&'M T T
.. __.
I.
.i
11
. ."
1 :
___
.
__ __".
:~
.i.
. .. .F
. .
J.
'
. . .
..
t45,7
-+
"N
"
.....
..
"
""
";" "
I'
"
\ :
":
..
.... "! ! _! 71LW5S ELEV. 0.0
.i
..
-'
I.
I . .
-I
..
"-.
..
..
..
I.
1-.,1
'
. ...
j....
t.
. .......
.... .
." .
...... . - .
"......
I..
..........
T .-
.. ..
"7.
. .. ..
..
"LE_
_i_
.. .. .. .
P6 ''
"...-
. ..-
A...
--I i
. ., . , .
. . .
.. .
..
. . . . .E
L EV. .4 .5
.
-,.
S.,/...
..
LWS ELEV. 0.0
... . , ..
-
I,.
1.I..
:
.. . ... .. . . . . .
.
..
. . i
. . .
. .
'
.. -
: . .....
..
... ..
1:.. l
. . " "
I.
,
"!
. ..
.I 1-... ::
~~~-.............
___._
___1.___
-4 .. .
....... .. .........
..
. ....... 7..
. ....
...
. . .
... .. .
.
.. ' .
. .. . .
.
.
..
I "*
..
'
...
___...
.|
::;
.....
~d
PI L,
1 2. a-'..
__
v"LL.
+
5 -"
..
... 17
.K .. . . .:
+:
l!
"
j:. ,
...
.v
"
i", "
. .I
ti
,
.++ 1
?
4:
.
. . .. ...
:.
+-I--;-. .. I
-.. . .
. .
:
. .
,.
-..-
t.. -.
.-
..-.. ,
VH7LwYS ELEV. 0.0
".
.". .
. . ......
I
...
I:
..............
..
.t: !
. .
I"i
4.
'
T rn
.
. ,:A
: : .
". . ....
____
-.. . ...
:i..4
... I.:r
'PILES: 7
. ;
II
. ..
2.28M .I. .. . ..
..........
.:
..
......
. .
L.
II
~
..
j.15
.~
-~i--. ,! :
.--
~-________
. ....
.II
.....
. ..
-i
"
I
-
1
.....
... I i
1 -i *;
I
.
.
0.0
,v...
"
/A LL
..
..
.. "I N
T'
Z 1
V 'L
0.
.1..,
.
"
I..!
..
i..
:.
. .
I.:
-711
I . . . . . . . .
o
...
I..
..
,
-. . ".-." !... . ..
...I
...
~~I .
....
.
. .
..
..
...
'-
.....
. I~~~~~~.. .... i. .. -.
,. I,
. ' ....
..
;;I
W.
O,
. ScF- i
rr
...............
: .....
..
.2....
..
...
!-.
, :... a.i.
i ..
: :..
-
.'... .. .... . :.. .. .. ... ... ...

. ......... I:.... j .........
-i ..... .
.. ..
:<i.
..
..
....
. ..
..
: ..
-......
/-
.. .
. .
"
.... i....
7'P"L S 4
2 28
t.1
.I
t ..
..
.....
""
...
.....
.0
..
0.
........ .~~~...
" " ".

: .
.....
. ..
.. .-.. . '..
.... . . .. .. .....
-"..--
.
... ...
..'":
.
..
. .
"
....
..
.........
..
. . .
..
......
. .... ...
. . . .- ..---
' ":
" I
''.
. . ":
.
:'
.. .
. .
..
EJLV
E.
0.
. .." .. . ... . . . . ..... .. .. . . ... ..

...
I
-.. T9
-.
..
..
. .
..
.I.
. .
4.........
"i.......__
*
_.
I -
7PI
. ! ,
.
iG2 26
M :!"/ .'-M . ' .
.
. .
p
-[-;-. 3
ii
I1
.:1.:".
":
....,......
.
....
U-:.-,
. :... ...
. .
..... -- ........
-i "
..
* i--..--....
*
... ". . . ..
I;
. .."
.1 .
" ":I:
. .......
...
T . .. . .
;.I. ".
:":/
,.
i! .. ...1
. ... !.
.. *.
.
"
.*1-
"
..
..i
I~I I
..
- .. .
.. ....
".I
..
U
i . ..
I..
......
TA I N-
.7PI
L E R 2.28 *M.:l
:-i. .
1.
.*
H.__..
PI '1" i ~i@2 :. ... W;

. ... . . . . . .
Aa ...
..
.j.:. . i-...
F.
....
.. ...
"-
EL V 0... 0
:..
-.
.
. .-----......
.
. .
....-.
-.
...
a..
~7LW-S
fLEV. 0.0
____
. .....
4-
'
~
*
" " '
.I
*1
................
a.
"
.
i.
. ...
"
'
"
....
~~.
..
. '..
.......
...................
"i
..:P
... . .,-.
. . . . . . ..
LES @2.28""
: :
......
T ..-........... ...
.;. ..
. 5 .6 . .
I i '#j;-;
.T.
......
. . .
. ..
..
'
;.*......-t
"-;
... -*
-t
"- "
"-
...
..
..
.. .i
.. ..
" "
;"
'
:.
"LW' 'LEV.
0.0
...
., +.
:1 ::
.
.**-
.. . .
I ...
.1.............
. : . .....
. " . . . I.. .. .
o
:
.
"" , i
'..
_______________
. .
.I..
. .. ...
.4N
.. .~"'. . .. .. .
j
.
I.
...
......
.
~lob
.J.."

1.
. .. .
"
. . ..
..
. ..
. ..
... .
........ ..

Somali Aggregate

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Somali Aggregate

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

AID Washington USAID Mogadishu

Contract Number AFR 0114-C-00-3021-00 Project Number 649-0114 Amendment No. I

Somali Democratic Republic

Kismayo Port Rehabilitation Additional Site Investigation Report

AID Washington USAID Mogadishu

Contract Number AFR 0114-C-00-3021 -00

Somali Democratic Republic

Kismayo Port Rehabilitation Additional Site Investigation Report

KISMAYO PORT REHABILITATION

SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS INVESTIGATIONS

Material Source Survey

SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION AT PORT

3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 4.0

AGGREGATE SOURCE INVESTIGATION

WATER SOUR(XE INVESTIGATION

6.0 WHARF TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY

TABLE OF CONTENTS (Cont'd)

Appendix Appendix Appendix Appendix Appendix

Logs of Water Jet Probings

1.0 1.1 Background

Parsons Brinckerhoff International, Inc.

proposed bulkhead structure.

SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS INVESTIGATIONS

Subsurface Investigation at Port

A previous subsurface investigation was conducted at the Port of Kismayo

A design analysis report( 3 ) prepared by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

According to Mowlem, when

Material Source Survey

3.0 3.1 Description of Work

SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION AT PORT

Water jet probings were conducted to locate the surface of boulders or

1 and 2, were drilled to evaluate

approximately 25 m (82 ft) below the seabed.

The four borings adjacent to the

existing wharf were drilled to a depth of 9.5 m (31 ft)

The drill unit was

encountered, and the next

The Somali Democratic Republic lies within the eastern part of

Plates 6 and 7, was generally found to be 1 to 3 m

DESIGN SOIL PROFILES FOR WHARF REHABILITATION

Angle of Internal Friction 300 350

Loose to medium dense

AGGREGATE SOURCE INVESTIGATION

A major consideration for the Port of Kismayo rehabilitation project

Laboratory Testing. Laboratory testing

Following is a detailed description of the above tasks and

material is obtained from a quarry near

Torda Quarry: The Torda Quarry is approximately 70 km from Kismayo,

The visual reconnaissance of the additional quarry sites located during

The laboratory tests performed on samples

L.A. abrasion tests yielded 22.7 to 37 percent loss for

TABLE 2 SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TESTING FOR QUARRY SAMPLES

Merca Control Pt.

indicated that a wider range of

It is recommended that these beach

The coarse aggregate available from

It is therefore concluded that locally available quarry material can be

available quarry material meets the standard

5.0 The previous

WATER SOURCE INVESTIGATION

PRELIMINARY RESULTS OF WATER SAMPLE ANALYSES

Water Supply (2) Nov. '83

Juba R. at Gobuen Juba R. at Gobuen

4Er /4r~~ Pr~e

IECT ,,iz Yo _TON ____ _ __Q---_AX rRACTOR c-7i . ,AL,

""2' _ _