Professional Documents
Culture Documents
By Rex A. Crouch
Copyright © 2008 by Rex A. Crouch
Abstract
This is an overview of the Kidd Creek Mine identifying the location of the deposit, geologic
origin, the structural geology of the deposit, geochemistry that makes the deposit unique but
relates it to nearby sulfide deposits, and an examination of the minerals from the MTU Kidd
Creek Suite. The major sulfide minerals in the deposit are mainly pyrite, chalcopyrite, and
sphalerite. Other minerals are bornite, covellite, digenite, stromeyerite, pyrrhotite, marcasite,
galena, aresenopyrite, and silver. X-ray diffraction was conducted on several samples in the
suite and results presented herein. One sulfide in the suite was breaking down into a sulfate
and was addressed in more detail. Several reflected light images of polished sections are
reviewed to emphasize the complexity of the deposit.
Genetic Type: Archean, volcanogenic massive sulfide (VMS) with metavolcanic and
komatiitic rocks and high silica rhyolites under tholeiitic basalt in an Abitibi greenstone
belt consisting of high-grade Zn, Cu, and Ag ore. [4][5]
The Kidd Creek deposit is a VMS Archean lens with a rhyolite volcaniclastic pile, felsic
flows, and a thick sequence of mafic flows with dikes and sill throughout located in the
Abitibi greenstone belt. The lens has been overturned between 70 and 80 degrees with
profound structural deformation to include at least three phases of folding and north
trending of the structural body. The initial folds were isoclinals and have been refolded
and partially obscured by a set of northwest trending shear folds. The mentioned north
trending reopened previous folds but resulted in a deformation of the two fold phases.
The shearing, in addition to faults had a significant affect on the distribution and
redistribution of the sulfides. Hydrothermal fluids were also responsible in the mineral
deposition as defined by elevated MgO, Fe 2O3, and Cu which transect both the footwall
which is predominately rhyolite and the ultramafic rocks of the lens. [5]
Significance: Kidd Creek Mine is one of the largest VMS deposits descending more
than 10000 feet, and the lateral extents of the VMS deposit are 6 times as large as the
main deposit itself. It is estimated that 138 million tons are in reserve with grades of
2.35% Cu, 6.5% Zn, 0.23% Pb, and 89 g/ton of Ag. Many other metals are present
(such as Au) but not in economic concentrations. [5] Other minerals recovered in the
deposit include: bornite, covellite, digenite, stromeyerite, pyrrhotite, marcasite, galena,
and aresenopyrite. [6]
Relation to Other Similar Deposits Worldwide: Moving along the eugeosynclinal
successions of metavolcanic and metasedimentary structures where the Kidd Creek
Mine is found, other deposits such as the Kotia, Jamieson, and Genex share similar
geochemistry in terms of sulfides but the nearby McIntyre deposit was unusual being a
dissemination of chalcopyrite with tennantite and molybdenite in a quartz-feldspar
porphyry plus gold. On the flanks of the structure where the sulfide mines are found,
there are large bodies of diorite and gabbro. Going about 12 miles south from the Kidd
Creek deposit you encounter large gold deposits. Looking past sulfides and other
precious metals found in the Kidd Creek deposit and focusing on oxygen isotope ratios
a different story may be told. The oxygen isotope ratios in Zircons from rhyolites found
in the Kidd Creek VMS are 18O = 5.4 ‰ which is typically what is found throughout the
Superior Province. What is uncommon is that 18O = 14.2 ‰ to 16.1 ‰ in primary quartz
phenocrysts. The 18O content from the zircons are believed to be from partial melting of
a tholeiite source but the variation in the 18O for the quartz in the Kidd Creek deposit
serve as an additional indicator that Kidd Creek had a high degree of hydrothermal
exchange. [7] In relation to other similar deposits worldwide, the Kidd Creek deposit is
considered unique geologically but based on geochemistry with at least one noted
exception being the 18O content, otherwise it does share some similarities with deposits
of close proximity. [6] The discrete differences in geochemistry indicate that Kidd Creek
was probably more hydrothermally active than other VMS deposits
Map and/or cross-section
The below stratigraphic column is a very simplified version of the actual strata.
The above photos are to assist the reader in understanding the ores as they are found
in this deposit. An overview of some of the specimens found in the deposit follows:
Description of Specimens:
Specimen 20-3-456
Pyrite-Zinc ore from North Zone ore
body
Specimen 20-3-461
Diorite
Specimen 3463
Vaguely banded Sphalerite Pyrite
Specimen 3444
Massive Andesite – Diorite from the
hanging wall
Specimen 3477
Massive banded Chalcopyrite
Specimen 3459
Cherty Breccia
Specimen 3453
Carbonaceous Horizon
Specimen 3464
Carbonaceous Sedimentary rock from
the hanging wall
Specimen 3445
Andesite – Diorite from the footwall
Specimen 3455
Sericitized Rhyolite from the North Zone
ore body footwall
Specimen 3450
Altered Rhyolite from the South Zone ore
body footwall
Specimen 3480
Sphalerite – Galena ore
Specimen 3470
Fine-grained massive Sphalerite Pyrite
ore with thin folds of pyrite
Specimen 3473
Pyrite in Carbonaceous Horizon
Specimen 20-3-453
Graphite Agillite with Pyrite crystals
Specimen 3460
Stringer ore in Rhyolite from footwall
Specimen 20-3-452
Rhyolite Agglomerate with Quartz Eyes
Specimen 3466
Pyrite ore with Slate in Carbonaceous
Horizon
Specimen 3475
Chalcopyrite from South Zone ore body
Specimen 3452
Carbonaceous Horizon
Specimen 3408
Disseminated Sulfides in Carbonaceous
Horizon
Specimen 20-3-454
Siliceous Chalcopyrite in Cherty Breccia
Sample which was missing its identification card: About ⅓ of this sample was breaking
down from a sulfide to a sulfate. As mentioned, this is the only sample in the suite that
is breaking down. It had the odor of battery acid.
This acidic pH level suggested possible electric conductivity. A 2.43 gram sample was
removed from the affected area of the ore. The resistance was first determined to be
763 Ohms/cm on the surface of the sample. The sample was then immersed in 10 ml
of H2O. With the voltage probes 1 cm apart and in contact with the immersed sample,
the voltage produced was 0.058 volts varying by 0.003 volts as the water turned a pale
blue green color. The H2O used was left with 380 ppm total dissolved solids. The
process of this sample breaking down into a sulfate is producing about 76 microwatts
per cm so we can assume that the sample is producing its own heat and to some
degree can easily break down in solution. A more introspective question outside of the
scope of this paper may ask how the heat formed during the chemical reaction may
affect the surrounding rocks?
An x-ray diffraction was conducted on the sample as presented below:
This trace was difficult to interpret. There was a lot of noise at the beginning of the
trace that could not be smoothed out but there were peaks that positively identified
pyrite and iron sulfate hydrate (Szomolnokite) FeSO 4*H2O in the sample. The
Szomolnokite confirmed the suspicion that the sample was becoming a sulfate. One
peak remained unidentified.
Examining sample 3466. In confirming that the identification labels that came with the
samples were correct one piece was selected to be scrutinized. A small silver colored
piece of metallic mix was removed from the larger sample 3466 which is shown in the
above sequence of photos. This sample is said to be pyrite ore with slate in a
carbonaceous horizon. X-ray diffraction was conducted on the sample and Dr. George
Robinson and myself found that chlorite and quartz were present in the sample as well
as a very clean pyrite FeS2. Below is a trace of the x-ray powder diffraction pattern:
Quartz
Pyrite
Chlorite
The last specimen to be scrutinized is sample 3408 which has a very non-descriptive
label which states: “Disseminated Sulfides in Carbonaceous Horizon”.
The above trace indicates that sample 3408 is predominately sphalerite and quartz
A microscopic look at the complexity of ore textures from the Kidd Creek deposit:
At the macro level, the Kidd Creek deposit is a geologically unique VMS with strong
evidence of hydrothermal alterations with geochemistry that shares some
commonalities with local deposits but is unique to the area. At the microscopic level
there are complex replacement series which required detailed study and explanation.
Economically, the deposit is very rich allowing for penetration past the 10,000 foot level
involving the advancement of mining technologies at all levels.
Works Cited:
[1] Info Mine (2006). “Regional Map of Kidd Creek Mine location”
[4] Gibson, R., Hannington, Gibbins, DeWolfe, and Duff (2003). "The Kidd Creek
Volcanogenic Massive Sulfide Deposit: A Growing Giant, After Fortyt Years of Mining,
Exploration, and Research." The Gangue(78): 18.
[5] David M. Richardson (1998), "An Alteration Study of the Archean Kidd Creek
Volcanogenic Massive Sulphide Deposit, Abitibi Greenstone Belt, Canada for the
Department of Geology, Laurentian University Sudbury, Ontario, Canada
[6] Geology and Economic Minerals of Canada (1972), Geologic Survey of Canada,
Economic Geology Report Number 1
[7] King, Barrie, and Valley (1997), “Hydrothermal Alteration of Oxygen Isotope Ratios in
Quartz Phenocrysts, Kidd Creek Mine, Ontario” Geology, v. 25, n. 12, p 1079-108
[8] Mineral Deposits of Canada (2006), Photo library: Giant Kidd Creek Volcanogenic
Massive Sulfide deposit, Western Abitibi Subprovince, Timmins, Ontario, Canada.
http://gsc.nrcan.gc.ca/mindep/photolib/vms/kidd_creek/index_e.php
Your Notes-
Saved