Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Foreword
The Army is at a turning point. Over the past decade, the Army has focused its resources and processes on fighting two wars, both of which developed into counterinsurgency and stability operations. We adopted the Army Force Generation model, changed Brigade Combat Team structure, refocused training, modified processes, purchased equipment and de-prioritized nonessential capabilities and missions to accomplish these critical tasks. While many of these changes were difficult, they were essential to accomplishing our mission while taking care of Soldiers and Families. Now, however, with the end of the war in Iraq and our plans for transition in Afghanistan, the President has asked the Army, along with the rest of the Department of Defense, to focus on fulfilling a broader range of missions and to do so while reducing defense spending. The development of the Army Program for Fiscal Years 2014 -18 is a key step in the process of refocusing the Army. The 2012 Army Strategic Planning Guidance (ASPG), Section I of The Army Plan (TAP), is our initial guidance for adapting the Army Program to meet new Department of Defense priorities, as defined by the Departments new guidance, Sustaining U.S. Global Leadership: Priorities for 21st Century Defense, and the Defense Planning Guidance for Fiscal Years 2014-18. As Section I of TAP, the ASPG is the foundation for strategic planning, priorities, and programming guidance to ensure Army resources are appropriately linked to strategy and will be the guide for evaluating the Army Program. The Army must transform itself from a force that focuses on counterinsurgency operations to an Army that is operationally adaptable, able to meet the range of Combatant Commander requirements as part of the Joint Force, including counterterrorism and irregular warfare; deterring and defeating aggression; projecting power despite anti-access/area denial challenges; countering weapons of mass destruction; operating effectively in cyberspace and in space; maintaining a safe, secure and effective nuclear deterrent; defending the homeland and providing support to civil authorities; providing a stabilizing presence; conducting stability and counterinsurgency operations; and conducting humanitarian, disaster relief and other operations. The breadth of missions the Army must fulfill requires changing priorities in the way we man, train, organize and equip the Army to ensure it is an agile, responsive, tailorable force capable of responding to any mission, anywhere, anytime. While not every Soldier will be trained for all missions, the Army as a whole will be trained to and capable of accomplishing all the missions with which it may be tasked. To do this the Army must re-invigorate capabilities that have declined, develop new capabilities for the changing world and adapt processes to reflect the broader range of requirements. This will require leveraging the capacity and capabilities of the 2012 ARMY STRATEGIC PLANNING GUIDANCE
Page 1
Page 2
Introduction
Embracing Change As the Nation adapts to an evolving security environment, the Army must embrace change to meet the needs of the Nation. The Army is faced with new challenges and new opportunities that require innovative approaches built on the lessons of the past decade. This guidance provides strategic planning parameters for implementation of the President and Secretary of Defenses Sustaining U.S. Global Leadership: Priorities for 21st Century Defense over the Future Years Defense Plan (FYDP). As the Army changes to meet its evolving requirements, it must continue to embrace its key characteristics of adaptability, flexibility, responsiveness and depth along with its experience of operating among populations across a variety of missions Missions of the U.S. Armed and activities. The future operational environment Forces from Sustaining U.S. requires that the Army prepare ready forces for a range of Global Leadership: Priorities for military operations and activities broader than its current 21st Century Defense counterinsurgency focus. Efforts to this end are already Counterterrorism and underway, the most significant of which is TRADOCs Irregular Warfare Army 2020 efforts. This series of studies and projects Deter and Defeat Aggression pursues many of the objectives identified in this ASPG. Project Power Despite AntiThe overarching Army of 2020 goal is to determine how Access/Area Denial Challenges. we transition from todays force to the Army of 2020 in Counter Weapons of Mass an era of fiscal austerity and still accomplish all that the Destruction Army must do as part of the Joint force. This will better Operate Effectively in support the full range of Joint Force Commanders future Cyberspace requirements, creating opportunities to better achieve Operate Effectively in Space national objectives. Maintain a Safe, Secure, and Effective Nuclear Deterrent A Complex and Competitive Security Environment Defend the Homeland and Provide Support to Civil The current security environment is complex, competitive Authorities and unpredictable, and will remain so for the foreseeable Provide a Stabilizing Presence future. The U.S. remains the preeminent global power Conduct Stability and but faces a host of complex relationships with Counterinsurgency Operations competitors and partners. Further, global economic Conduct Humanitarian, conditions are forcing many nations, including the U.S., Disaster Relief, and Other to make hard fiscal choices. Operations 2012 ARMY STRATEGIC PLANNING GUIDANCE
Page 3
Vision
The Army is globally engaged and regionally responsive; it is an indispensible partner and provider of a full range of capabilities to Combatant Commanders in a Joint, Interagency, Intergovernmental, and Multi-national (JIIM) environment. As part of the Joint Force and as America's Army, in all that we offer, we guarantee the agility, versatility and depth to Prevent, Shape and Win. Prevent, Shape, Win Framing What the Army Provides to the Nation The interdependent and at times simultaneous nature of Prevent, Shape, and Win allows Army actions within theaters to reinforce each other to meet the Joint Force and National objectives. 2012 ARMY STRATEGIC PLANNING GUIDANCE
Page 4
Army Imperatives
Throughout this decade and beyond, a globally engaged and regionally responsive Armya force of decisive action that can Prevent, Shape and Winhas four imperatives. Provide modernized and ready, tailored land force capabilities to meet Combatant Commanders requirements across the range of military operations. Develop leaders to meet the challenges of the 21st Century. Adapt the Army to more effectively provide land power. Sustain the All-volunteer Army.
Page 6
Page 8
Adapt the Army to more effectively provide land power. Over the last decade, the Army optimized its institutions for the current force readiness model, providing a steady supply of forces for large, continuous operations, while prioritizing ready forces over cost considerations. The mission requirements are changing and the Army will adjust accordingly. As such, the Army as an institution will seek to rebalance and prepare to respond to the next crisis, increasing institutional responsiveness through adaptive and transparent processes and supporting systems, and through continued investments in the required infrastructure to support these endeavors.
Page 11
Page 12
Sustain the All-volunteer Army The All-volunteer Force is our greatest strategic asset, providing depth, versatility, and unmatched experience to the Joint Force. The Army must retain the capabilities of this combat seasoned force and maintain the bonds of trust with our Soldiers and Families while we reduce our numbers responsibly to arrive at a smaller, balanced force. We must do this while remaining mindful that ten years of war and multiple deployments have strained our Soldiers and Families. (Continuous) Improve the Efficacy of Programs that Support our Soldiers, Families, Civilians, and Wounded Warriors. The Army must reinforce effective Soldier and Family programs. These programs will ensure our people remain resilient and enabled. The intent is to maximize the utility of these programs for Soldiers and Families, while eliminating waste in unnecessary activities and processes. (Continuous) Remain Army Strong and Enhance Army Professionalism. The Army must maintain the trust between the Soldier and the Army the basis of our profession. The Armys future success will be built upon maintaining this mutual trust through appropriate compensation, sustainable benefits, leader development, training systems and programs that support our Soldiers, Civilians and Families.
Page 13
CONCLUSION
Since September 11, 2001, Soldiers have sacrificed for the Nation and never wavered from a mission. The purpose of the Army has not changed: to fight and win the Nations wars. To serve this purpose, we will continue to employ and adapt our capabilities to be increasingly responsive to Combatant Commanders as part of the Joint Force. The Army will continue to provide the flexibility needed for national security decision makers, at home and abroad. To ensure we are able to do this within a shrinking budget, our Soldiers, equipment, network, and units must be restored, reconstituted, kept ready and, where appropriate, modernized. Trained and ready units must provide depth and versatility to the Joint Force. We must also preserve our All-volunteer Army of high quality Soldiers, Civilians, and leaders. This strategic guidance ensures we remain the Nations force of decisive action, ready today and prepared for tomorrow.
Page 15
Admiral Michael Mullen, Irregular Warfare: Countering Irregular Threats Joint Operating Concept , version 2, May 17, 2010, Department of Defense Technical Information Center, http://www.dtic.mil/futurejointwarfare/concepts/iw_joc2_0.pdf, accessed February 21, 2012)
Page 16
Shortened from Military Contribution to Cooperative Security Joint Operating Concept or CS. The IW JOC overlaps with the CS JOC. For instance, Multi- lateral and Bi-lateral exercises can serve as capstone events from months or years of FID and SFA work. Secretary Robert Gates, Military Contribution to Cooperative Security (CS) Joint Operating Concept, version 1.0, September 19, 2008, Department of Defense Technical Information Center, http://www.dtic.mil/futurejointwarfare/concepts/cs_jocv1.pdf, accessed February 21, 2012.
Page 17
Page 18
Mid-term Objectives Revitalize the Profession of Arms in the 21st Century Adapt the Army to more effectively provide land power. Near-term Objectives Reform and Restructure the Institutional Army Reset the Force Mid-term Objectives Continue to Modernize Business Operations Rebalance the Generating Force Set Conditions to Expand the Total Army When Called Upon Commit to Reducing Energy Requirements and Employing Sustainable Practices Provide Infrastructure and Support to Enable the Force to Fulfill its Strategic Roles and Missions Sustain the All-volunteer Army. Continuous Objectives Improve the Efficacy of Programs that Support our Soldiers, Families, Civilians, and Wounded Warriors Remain Army Strong and Enhance Army Professionalism Maintain an Army that Embraces and Leverages the Diversity of our Soldiers and Civilians Develop, Align and Integrate the Army Personnel Life-cycle Model and Processes to Optimize Soldier Management and Development
Page 20