Professional Documents
Culture Documents
13156
“Hamlet” has been read by various critics as dramatically presenting a man with a
fatal flaw, a misfit in a treacherous world or a weak revenger. In light of this, and
using the soliloquies as a starting point, examine how an Elizabethan audience
might have understood Hamlet and how that compares with your reading.
Hamlet’s first soliloquy occurs early in Act I, Scene 2 here Hamlet cannot confide
his feelings in anyone around him. Throughout the soliloquy Hamlet’s feelings
quickly change from one to another. Shakespeare presents a very isolated character
in Hamlet; in Kenneth Branagh’s film version2 someone who stands in a corner still
dressed in black signifying that he is still grieving the death of his father. This is
evident in the use of the soliloquy rather than dialogue with the other characters
on stage.
1
Oxford Dictionary Definition
2
Hamlet (1996) film version of Shakespeare’s Hamlet adapted and directed by Kenneth Branagh.
-1-
Stephan Amaranath Candidate No. 4204 Centre No. 13156
In Hamlet’s soliloquy in Act II Scene 2 we see Hamlet going through several changes
of mood. These are self-criticism “O what a rogue and peasant slave am I?”
imagining someone’s reaction to real grievance, self-disgust, rage and self-
reproach for his emotional outburst. Shakespeare presents Hamlet as a complex
individual portraying the ability to think about a situation carefully, proving that he
is a rational thinker in most cases, which is actually his flaw. This can also be seen
in his plan to catch the King with the actors’ play. The Act II Scene 2 soliloquy also
shows the audience that Hamlet is capable of feeling emotions like anger and rage.
In this soliloquy Shakespeare allows Hamlet to get rid of a lot of emotion, leading
to the cunning, intelligent Hamlet that devises the plan to catch his uncle; a plan
that a traditional hero would not need as a traditional hero would not require proof
to take revenge; this is one way that Hamlet is presented as a weak revenger.
However, Shakespeare also uses this soliloquy to present Hamlet’s major flaw to
the audience: his procrastination. In the soliloquy Hamlet becomes clearly angry at
his inability to act, it is here Hamlet recognises his flaw. Hamlet’s procrastination
suggests to the audience that he is thinking deeply about the consequences that his
actions might bring. Goethe Johann Wolfgang von4 has argued that it is this that
makes Hamlet one of most identified with character in English Literature.
The soliloquy ends with elation at the thought he will prove his uncle’s guilt. He
decides that a play of his father’s murder will test the words of the spirit that
visited him. Hamlet hopes that the play “…Wherein I’ll catch the conscience of the
king.” will give him some confirmation that the Ghost was telling the truth and it
will provoke Claudius into revealing his guilt. Hamlet’s complexity of character is
presented very effectively to an audience in this scene. Hamlet is again presented
as an intellectual in Act III Scene 1; he is seen to be thinking about suicide and life
after death.
“To be or not to be, that is the question…” What Hamlet is asking is ‘is it better to
live or die, to endure suffering or to fight against it?’ The metaphor at the start of
the soliloquy, “take arms against a sea of troubles, and by opposing end them” is
purposely confused. It captures Hamlet’s emotions of being unable to do the huge
responsibility that has been given to him. Though in this soliloquy, there is no word
about his father, his mother, his uncle, or any plans for revenge; this links to
Shakespeare’s purpose to explore the nature of man.
3
Hamlet as The Christmas Prince: Certain Speculations on Hamlet, the Calendar, Revels, and Misrule.
- Roth Steve. (EMLS 7.3.)
4
Wilhelm Meister's Apprenticeship - Goethe Johann Wolfgang von. The discussion of Hamlet in chapter
XIII is, in the words of Stephen Greenblatt "...what is probably the most influential of all readings of
Hamlet..." (Hamlet in Purgatory, p. 229).
-2-
Stephan Amaranath Candidate No. 4204 Centre No. 13156
It seems as if Hamlet has completely forgotten that not long ago the ghost of his
dead father visited him. An Elizabethan audience may believe that Hamlet is a
coward since Hamlet contemplates suicide; they may have thought that Hamlet
saw suicide as a more attractive option than his revenge task. Hamlet looks
forward to death as an end to all emotional and physical pain this is one other way
Hamlet is presented as a weak revenger. Hamlet is worried that if he commits
suicide and “shuffles off this mortal coil” he will not be able to control what comes
after death. He compares death to sleep; when we sleep and dream we are not in
control of our bodies or thoughts. However the argument that Hamlet has with
himself is clear-cut and its conclusion logical that why should we suffer in life when
we could find peace in death because it might not be peace and no one has
returned from death to set the record straight “The undiscovered country from
whose bourn no traveller returns…” therefore we “bear those ills we have”.
In the end the audience hear “conscience does make cowards of us all…” The
audience realises that Hamlet has decided that thinking stops people from acting
which is certainly true of him. The audience can relate what Hamlet is saying to his
present situation and have an image of him thinking, which is preventing him “the
pale cast of thought…” from committing, not suicide, but the act of revenge
“enterprises of great pitch and moment…”
Hamlet’s final soliloquy in Act IV Scene 4 is similar emotionally for Hamlet to the
soliloquy in Act I Scene 2. Yet Shakespeare gives us a much more penetrating
insight into the processes of Hamlet’s tortured thinking. The audience has seen
that Hamlet has been spurred to commit revenge, but he still hasn’t acted
presenting him as a weak revenger. Hamlet thinks back to “all occasions” where he
had a chance and all those that “informed” him to kill Claudius. The opening of the
soliloquy is to remind the audience of Hamlet’s failure to capitalize on former
opportunities also presenting him as a weak revenger. “I do not know. Why yet I
live to say this…” As with many of Hamlet’s speeches the audience will see this as
ironic and clearly not the case. Hamlet may have the cause, the strength, and the
means to commit the murder asked of him, but if he had the will, then he would
have acted a long time before and would not be in the position he is in now.
At this point the audience could draw a parallel between Hamlet and Laertes;
Shakespeare portrays Hamlet in a different light, not as the thinker but more
similar to the typical revenger Laertes, the two characters develop as contrasting
characters. The clear illustration of Hamlet and Laertes’s similarities rests in their
roles as avengers; both display impulsive reactions when angered. Hamlet’s desires
-3-
Stephan Amaranath Candidate No. 4204 Centre No. 13156
are revealed in his words “So, uncle, there you are. Now to my word…” here it is
apparent that Hamlet is angry and ready to seek revenge on his uncle. Similarly,
Laertes reveals his anger against Claudius for the death of his father. Unlike
Hamlet, Laertes literally invades the castle upon receiving news of the death of his
father. Another important aspect is that Laertes is so bent on getting revenge that
he is willing to be damned to Hell. Hamlet, on the other hand believes his soul is
more valuable than instant revenge. Clearly, the only similarity between Hamlet
and Laertes as avengers is their desires are rash in anger, presenting Hamlet as the
weaker revenger and Laertes as the “typical” revenger.
5
The Character of Hamlet - William Hazlitt (The following biography was originally published in The
Outlines of Literature: English and American. Truman J. Backus. New York: Sheldon and Company,
1897. pp. 90-102.)
6
Hamlet and His Problems, from The Sacred Wood. - Eliot, T. S.
-4-