State Assessment, Maddux

Building Information - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Maddux Elem (21949)
Program Type: Setting: Assessment Name: Assessment Date: Cost Set: Building Name: Building Address: Building City: Building Zipcode: Building Phone: Acreage: Current Grades: Teaching Stations: Number of Floors: Student Capacity: Current Enrollment: Enrollment Date:
Assessment Only Suburban 21949-Maddux Elementary-FINAL 2004-06-03 2004 Maddux Elem 943 Rosetree Lane Cincinnati 45230 513-231-0780 20 K-6 35 2 417 617 2003-10-01
Enrollment Date is the date in which the current enrollment was taken. Number of Classrooms: Historical Register Buildings Principal: Building Type: Current Elementary Enrollment: Current Middle Enrollment: Current High Enrollment: Current Career Technical Enrollment: 28 NO Stephen Troehler Elementary/Middle 533 84 0 0
Next Page
Page 1
Report Generated at 19 May 2005 06:43
Building Pictures - Forest Hills Local SD(47340) - Maddux Elem(21949)
North elevation photo:
East elevation photo:
South elevation photo:
West elevation photo:
GENERAL DESCRIPTION 57,930 Total Existing Square Footage 1966,1993 Building Dates K-6 Grades 617 Current Enrollment 35 Teaching Stations 20 Site Acreage Maddux Elementary School, which is not on the National Register of Historic Buildings, is a 1966 2-story, 57,930 square foot brick school building located in a suburban residential setting. The existing facility does not use modular buildings. The structure of the original building is a steel frame and nonbearing masonry wall construction except for the Gymnasium, which is brick veneer on masonry bearing wall. The floor system consists primarily of concrete slab on grade with precast concrete used over the basement area. The roof structure is metal deck and steel joists except for the Gymnasium, which has tectum deck. The structure of the 1994 addition contains bearing masonry exterior and interior wall construction. The floor system consists of concrete slab on grade. The roof structure is metal deck and steel joists. The roofing system over the original building is EPDM installed in phases over the past 17 years. The roofing system of the addition is built-up with gravel ballast installed in 1994. The ventilation system of the building is inadequate to meet the needs of the users. The classrooms are slightly smaller than the current standards established by the State of Ohio. Physical Education and Student Dining spaces consist of one Gymnasium and separate Student Dining. The electrical system for the facility is inadequate. The facility is equipped with a security system, but it lacks some of the OSFC standard features. The building has a non-compliant fire alarm system. The facility is not equipped with an automated fire suppression system. The building is reported to contain asbestos. The overall building is not compliant with ADA accessibility requirements. The school is located on a 20 acre site. The property is not fenced for security. Access onto the site is unrestricted. Site circulation is fair. There is space for school buses to load and unload on the site, which is shared with parking. Parking for staff, visitors and community events is adequate.
Page 2
Previous Page Next Page
Page 3
Program Type: Setting: Assessment Name: Assessment Date: Cost Set: Building Name: Building Address: Building City: Building Zipcode: Building Phone: Acreage: Current Grades: Teaching Stations: Number of Floors: Student Capacity: Current Enrollment: Enrollment Date:
Assessment Only Suburban 21949-Maddux Elementary-FINAL 2004-06-03 2004 Maddux Elem 943 Rosetree Lane Cincinnati 45230 513-231-0780 20 K-6 35 2 417 617 2003-10-01
Enrollment Date is the date in which the current enrollment was taken. Number of Classrooms: Historical Register Buildings Principal: Building Type: Current Elementary Enrollment: Current Middle Enrollment: Current High Enrollment: Current Career Technical Enrollment: 28 NO Stephen Troehler Elementary/Middle 533 84 0 0
Next Page
Page 4
Building Construction Information - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Maddux Elem (21949)
Name Original Building
Year Handicapped Access Floors Square Feet 1966 no 2 1 53,520 4,410
Classroom Addition 1993 yes Previous Page Next Page
Building Construction Information - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Maddux Elem (21949)
Page 5
Building Component Information - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Maddux Elem (21949)
Addition Original Building (1966) Classroom Addition (1993)
Auditorium Corridors 8634 597
Agricultural Media Vocational Student Gymnasium Kitchen Natatorium Education Lab Center Space Dining 3299 1210 2404 1432
Previous Page Next Page
Building Component Information - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Maddux Elem (21949)
Page 6
Career Technical Information - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Maddux Elem (21949) No Career Technical Programs Present Previous Page Next Page
Career Technical Information - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Maddux Elem (21949)
Page 7
Main Assessment Menu - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Maddux Elem (21949)
Building Summary - Maddux Elem (21949)

District: Name: Forest Hills Local SD Maddux Elem Cincinnati,OH 45230 Bldg. IRN: 21949 Current Grades Proposed Grades Current Enrollment Projected Enrollment Addition Original Building Total *HA *Rating = Handicapped Access =1 Satisfactory =2 Needs Repair =3 Needs Replacement *Const P/S = Present/Scheduled Construction FACILITY ASSESSMENT Cost Set: 2004 A. Heating System B. Roofing C. Ventilation / Air Conditioning D. Electrical Systems E. Plumbing and Fixtures F. Windows G. Structure: Foundation H. Structure: Walls and Chimneys I. Structure: Floors and Roofs J. General Finishes K. Interior Lighting L. Security Systems M. Emergency/Egress Lighting N. Fire Alarm O. Handicapped Access P. Site Condition Q. Sewage System R. Water Supply S. Exterior Doors T. Hazardous Material U. Life Safety V. Loose Furnishings W. Technology X. Construction Contingency / Non-Construction Cost Rating 3 3 1 3 3 2 1 2 1 3 3 2 3 3 3 2 1 1 3 2 3 3 3 K-6 N/A 617 N/A Acreage: Teaching Stations: Classrooms: County: Contact: Phone: Hamilton Stephen Troehler 513-231-0780 By: By: Tony Zircher Bill Mentges Area: Cincinnati (1)
Address: 943 Rosetree Lane
Date Prepared: 2004-06-03 Date Revised: 2004-11-16 20 35 28 Cover Sheet Section CEFPI Appraisal Summary
Points Possible Points Earned Percentage Rating Category 100 200 100 200 200 200 1000 83 135 69 154 129 136 706 83% 68% 69% 77% 65% 68% 71% Satisfactory Borderline Borderline Satisfactory Borderline Borderline Satisfactory
Date HA Number of Floors Current Square Feet 1.0 The School Site 1966 no 2 53,520 2.0 Structural and Mechanical Features 1 4,410 3.0 Plant Maintainability 57,930 4.0 Building Safety and Security 5.0 Educational Adequacy 6.0 Environment for Education Commentary Total C=Under Contract Dollar Assessment C Renovation Cost Factor $1,245,495.00 - Cost to Renovate (Cost Factor applied)
Classroom Addition 1993 yes
100.44% $6,301,019.98
$238,660.00 - The Replacement Cost Per SF and the Renovate/Replace ratio are only provided when this summary is $0.00 - requested from a Master Plan. $537,048.00 $322,020.00 $3,300.00 $0.00 $65,180.00 $0.00 $907,846.00 $231,720.00 $92,688.00 $57,930.00 $86,895.00 $241,793.00 $197,540.00 $0.00 $0.00 $14,000.00 $92,183.00 $203,272.50 $173,790.00 $334,256.10 $1,227,800.34 $6,273,416.94 Previous Page
Total
Page 8
Original Building (1966) Summary

100.44% $6,301,019.98
$238,660.00 - The Replacement Cost Per SF and the Renovate/Replace ratio are only provided when this summary is $0.00 - requested from a Master Plan. $529,848.00 $322,020.00 $0.00 $0.00 $65,180.00 $0.00 $862,234.00 $214,080.00 $85,632.00 $53,520.00 $80,280.00 $241,352.00 $192,806.90 $0.00 $0.00 $6,000.00 $91,962.00 $188,940.00 $160,560.00 $308,810.40 $1,166,222.84 $5,958,788.14
Total
Page 9
Classroom Addition (1993) Summary

Date HA Number of Floors Current Square Feet 1.0 The School Site 1966 no 2 53,520 2.0 Structural and Mechanical Features 1 4,410 3.0 Plant Maintainability 57,930 4.0 Building Safety and Security 5.0 Educational Adequacy 6.0 Environment for Education Commentary Total C=Under Contract Dollar Assessment C Renovation Cost Factor $94,815.00 - Cost to Renovate (Cost Factor applied)
100.44% $6,301,019.98
$0.00 - The Replacement Cost Per SF and the Renovate/Replace ratio are only provided when this summary is $0.00 - requested from a Master Plan. $7,200.00 $0.00 $3,300.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $45,612.00 $17,640.00 $7,056.00 $4,410.00 $6,615.00 $441.00 $4,733.10 $0.00 $0.00 $8,000.00 $221.00 $14,332.50 $13,230.00 $25,445.70 $61,577.50 $314,628.80
Total
Page 10
Facility Assessment
A. Heating System
Description:
The existing system for the overall facility is a gas fired hot water system, installed in 1966, and is in fair condition. The two hot water boilers, manufactured by International, were installed in 1966 (1 rebuilt 4 years ago) and are in fair condition. Heating water is distributed to terminal units consisting of unit ventilators, cabinet heaters, and air handlers. The terminal equipment was installed in 1966 and is in fair condition. The 1993 addition is an extension of the original hot water unit ventilator system. The system does not comply with the 15 CFM per person fresh air requirements of the Ohio Building Code mechanical code and Ohio School Design Manual. The pneumatic system temperature controls were installed in 1966 and are in fair condition. The system does not feature individual temperature controls in all spaces required by the OSDM. Louvered interior doors are a violation of the Ohio Building Code, and interior doors in this facility are louvered to facilitate corridor utilization as return air plenums. Louvered doors are replaced in Items J and O. The existing system is not ducted. The overall heating system is evaluated as not being in safe and efficient working order, and long-term life expectancy of the existing system is not anticipated. The structure is not equipped with air conditioning. The site does not contain underground fuel tanks. 3 Needs Replacement Provide new overall heating, ventilating, and air conditioning system to achieve compliance with Ohio Building Code and Ohio School Design Manual standards. Provide for a ducted system. Cost Unit Whole Building Original Building (1966) 53,520 ft Required Required $1,245,495.00 $1,150,680.00 Classroom Addition Sum Comments (1993) 4,410 ft Required $1,042,740.00(includes demo of existing system and reconfiguration of piping layout and new controls and air conditioning) Required $202,755.00(includes cost for vert. & horz. chases, cut openings, soffits, etc.) $94,815.00
Rating: Recommendations:
Item
HVAC System Replacement: $18.00sq.ft. Convert To Ducted System Replacement Sum: $3.50sq.ft.
Gymnasium Air Handler Back to Assessment Summary
Unit Ventilator
Facility Assessment
Page 11
Facility Assessment
B. Roofing
Description:
The roof over the original construction is an EPDM system that was installed in three phases (1987, 1992, 1997) and is in fair condition. There are District reports of current leaking in the corner of the gymnasium. Signs of past leaking were observed during the physical assessment. The roof over the 1993 addition is a built-up system with gravel ballast that was installed in 1993, and is in fair condition. There are no District reports of current leaking. No signs of past leaking were observed during the physical assessment. Access to the roof was gained by ladder. There were no observations of standing water on the roof. Roof drains are adequate in number, properly located, and in fair condition. 3 Needs Replacement The roof over the original building requires replacement to meet Ohio School Design Manual guidelines for age of system.
Item
Whole BuildingOriginal Building (1966)Classroom Addition (1993)Sum Comments 53,520 ft 4,410 ft Membrane (all types):$5.00sq.ft. (Qty) 47,732 Required $238,660.00(unless under 10,000 sq.ft.) Sum: $238,660.00 $238,660.00 $0.00
Cost Unit
EPDM Roof Back to Assessment Summary
Built-Up Roof
Facility Assessment
Page 12
Facility Assessment
C. Ventilation / Air Conditioning

Description:
The overall facility is not equipped with an air conditioning system. Multiple rooftop condensing units serve individual areas such as the computer lab, art, music, and office areas. Units vary in age and condition from good to poor. Window units are provided in the library. The ventilation system in the overall facility consists of unit ventilators, installed in 1966 / 1994 and in fair condition, providing fresh air to classrooms, and air handlers, installed in 1966 and in fair condition, providing fresh air to other miscellaneous spaces such as the gymnasium. Interior doors are louvered to facilitate corridor utilization as return air plenums. The ventilation system does not meet the Ohio Building Code 15 CFM per occupant fresh air requirement. The overall system is not compliant with Ohio Building Code and Ohio School Design Manual requirements. Dust collection systems are not required in this facility. Exhaust systems for restrooms, kitchen, and custodial closets are adequate. 1 Satisfactory Provide an air conditioning system to meet with Ohio Building Code and Ohio School Design Manual requirements. Pricing included in Item A.
Item CostUnitWhole BuildingOriginal Building (1966)Classroom Addition (1993)SumComments 53,520 ft 4,410 ft Sum: $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Rooftop Condensing Unit Back to Assessment Summary
Air Conditioning Unit
Facility Assessment
Page 13
Facility Assessment
D. Electrical Systems
Description:
The electrical system provided to the overall facility is a 1600 amp, 120/208 volt, 3 phase, 4 wire system installed in 1966, and is in fair condition. The system in the 1994 addition is an extension of the original construction. Power is provided to the school by a utility owned, pad-mounted transformer located near the mechanical room, and in fair condition. The panel system, installed in 1966 / 1994, is in fair condition, with limited capacity for expansion. The classrooms are not equipped with adequate electrical outlets. The typical classroom contains 4 general purpose outlets and no dedicated outlet for each classroom television, as well as no dedicated outlets for student and teacher computers. All the spaces have electrical outlets. The corridors are not equipped with adequate electrical outlets for servicing. There are adequate GFI protected exterior outlets located around the perimeter of the building. The overall electrical system does not meet Ohio School Design Manual requirements in supporting the current needs of the school, and will be inadequate to meet the facilitys future needs. 3 Needs Replacement The entire electrical system in the original building requires replacement to meet Ohio School Design Manual guidelines for classroom capacity, due to condition and age, and to accommodate the addition of an air conditioning system. Provide additional panels (circuits / outlets) to increase capacity for the 1994 addition. Unit Whole Building Original Building (1966) 53,520 ft Required Classroom Addition (1993) 4,410 ft Sum Comments
Item
Cost
System $9.90sq.ft. Replacement: Additional Circuits: $800.00per circuit Additional $250.00each Receptacles Sum:
4 Required 16 Required $537,048.00 $529,848.00 $7,200.00
$529,848.00(includes demo of existing system. Does not include telephone or data cable or equipment) $3,200.00 $4,000.00
Main Panels Back to Assessment Summary
Transformer
Facility Assessment
Page 14
Facility Assessment
E. Plumbing and Fixtures

Description:
The service entrance is equipped with a reduced pressure backflow preventer in fair condition. A water treatment system is provided for the dishwasher only and is in fair condition. The domestic water supply piping in the overall facility is copper in fair to poor condition. The waste piping in the overall facility is cast iron in fair condition. The facility is equipped with four 200 gallon hot water storage tanks that are filled by the boiler. The storage tanks are in fair to poor condition. Hot water is not available when the boilers are not operating. The school contains two restrooms for boys, two restrooms for girls, and five restrooms for staff. Boys restrooms contain 1 ADA and 2 non-ADA wall mounted flush valve toilets, no ADA and 7 non-ADA wall mounted flush valve urinals, and 5 ADA and 1 non-ADA wall mounted lavatories. Girls restrooms contain 1 ADA and 6 non-ADA wall mounted flush valve toilets, as well as no ADA and 6 non-ADA wall mounted lavatories. Staff restrooms contain 2 ADA and 3 non-ADA wall mounted flush valve toilets, no urinals, and 2 ADA and 3 non-ADA wall mounted lavatories. There are 14 individual restrooms located in the classrooms. Each individual restroom contains a non-ADA wall mounted flush valve toilet. Classrooms are equipped with a sink with a bubbler. The facility is equipped with 4 ADA and no non-ADA electric water coolers, in good condition. The school meets the OBC requirements for fixtures. ADA requirements are not met for fixtures. Drinking fountains are not adequately provided. Adequate exterior wall hydrants are provided. Project laboratories for sixth grade classes are not equipped with the required gas, compressed air, or safety shower/eye wash. 3 Needs Replacement Replace water supply piping in the original facility with new copper piping. See Item O for replacement of fixtures related to ADA requirements. Replace remaining plumbing fixtures due to age, condition and work associated with piping replacement. Remove hot water storage tanks and provide new hot water heater and hot water piping system. Provide gas, compressed air, and safety shower/eyewash in sixth grade project laboratories. Cost Unit Whole Building Original Building (1966) 53,520 ft Required 1 Required 23 Required 6 Required 42 Required 1 Required 7 Required 1 Required $322,020.00 $322,020.00 $0.00 Classroom Addition Sum Comments (1993) 4,410 ft $187,320.00(remove / replace) $5,100.00(remove / replace) $34,500.00(remove / replace) See Item O $9,000.00(remove / replace) $63,000.00(remove / replace) $2,500.00 $5,600.00 $15,000.00
Item
Domestic Supply Piping: Domestic Water Heater: Toilet:
$3.50sq.ft. $5,100.00per unit $1,500.00unit
Urinal: $1,500.00unit Sink: $1,500.00unit HIGH BAY/INDUSTRIAL SPACE - LAB TYPES 5,6,7 - Safety $2,500.00each Shower/Eyewash - New Installation HIGH BAY/INDUSTRIAL SPACE - LAB TYPES 5,6,7 - Natural Gas $800.00each Connections HIGH BAY/INDUSTRIAL SPACE - LAB TYPES 5,6,7 - Compressed $15,000.00per Air Connections system Sum:
Wall Mounted Urinals Back to Assessment Summary
Classroom Sink with Bubbler
Facility Assessment
Page 15
Facility Assessment
F. Windows
Description:
The overall facility is equipped with thermally broken aluminum frame windows with double pane insulated glazing type window system, which was installed in 2002, and is in good condition. The exterior doors in the original building are equipped with thermally broken aluminum sidelights and transoms with double pane insulated glazing, in good condition. The exterior doors in the 1994 addition are equipped with hollow metal transoms with insulated panel, in poor condition. The school does not contain skylights. 2 Needs Repair Replace window transoms in 1994 addition exterior doors.
Item
Whole BuildingOriginal Building (1966)Classroom Addition (1993)Sum Comments 53,520 ft 4,410 ft Curtain Wall/Storefront System:$55.00sq.ft. (Qty) 60 Required $3,300.00 Sum: $3,300.00 $0.00 $3,300.00
Cost
Unit
Original Building Windows Back to Assessment Summary
1994 Addition Windows
Facility Assessment
Page 16
Facility Assessment
G. Structure: Foundation
Description:
The original facility is equipped with concrete foundation walls on concrete footings, which displayed no locations of major settlement, or leaking. Minor spalling of the concrete foundations occurs at some of the building corners, but the foundations are in overall good condition and require no repair. The 1994 addition is equipped with concrete masonry unit foundation walls on concrete footings, which displayed no locations of major settlement, cracking, or leaking, and are in good condition. The District reports that there has been past leaking in the mechanical room due to a water main break. 1 Satisfactory Existing conditions require no renovation or replacement at the present time.
Concrete Foundation Wall Back to Assessment Summary
Concrete Foundation Wall
Facility Assessment
Page 17
Facility Assessment
H. Structure: Walls and Chimneys

Description:
The classroom portion of the original building is equipped with steel columns and beams that support the roof structure. The original facility has a brick veneer on a masonry bearing wall system (gym), steel frame with brick veneer over nonbearing masonry wall (classroom), which displayed locations of deterioration, and is in fair condition. The 1994 addition has a brick veneer on a masonry bearing wall system, which displayed no locations of deterioration, and is in good condition. The exterior masonry appears to have appropriately spaced and adequately caulked control joints in fair condition. The exterior masonry has not been cleaned and sealed in recent years, and shows evidence of mortar deterioration in numerous locations. Interior walls are primarily concrete masonry units, and are in fair condition. Some minor cracking was noted on classroom wing interior walls. The cracking was attributed, by the District, to the new windows. Some additional cracking was noted in the gymnasium. The cracking appears to be the result of inadequately spaced control joints. The original building window sills are an element of the aluminum window system, and are in good condition. The 1994 addition window sills are stone and in good condition. 2 Needs Repair Provide tuckpointing in all areas of mortar deterioration as required in the original building. Provide masonry cleaning and sealing as required in the original building. Replace severely damaged exterior masonry. Repair gymnasium cracking. Cost Unit Whole Building Original Building (1966) 53,520 ft 600 Required 20,000 Required 20,000 Required 840 Required 184 Required $65,180.00 Classroom Addition (1993) 4,410 ft Sum Comments
Item
Tuckpointing:
$2.50sq.ft. (Qty) Exterior Masonry Cleaning: $1.00sq.ft. (Qty) Exterior Masonry Sealing: $0.75sq.ft. (Qty) Replace Brick Veneer $21.00sq.ft. System: (Qty) Install Control Joints $60.00ln.ft. Sum:
$1,500.00(wall surface) $20,000.00(wall surface) $15,000.00(wall surface) $17,640.00(total removal and replacement including pinning and shoring) $11,040.00 $0.00
$65,180.00
Original Building Back to Assessment Summary
Damaged Exterior Wall
Facility Assessment
Page 18
Facility Assessment
I. Structure: Floors and Roofs

Description:
The floor construction of the base floor of the overall facility is concrete slab on grade type construction. The east classroom wing appears to have experienced some settling over the buildings life. There is no crawl space. The floor construction of the second floor of the original building is precast concrete planks with concrete topping type construction, and is in fair condition. The roof construction of the gymnasium volume is tectum deck on steel joist type construction, and is in fair condition. The roof construction of the remainder of the facility is metal deck on steel joist type construction, and is in fair condition. 1 Satisfactory Existing conditions require no renovation or replacement at the present time.
Steel Canopy Framing Back to Assessment Summary
Concrete Floor Settling
Facility Assessment
Page 19
Facility Assessment
J. General Finishes
Description:
The original 1966 building has classrooms with vinyl asbestos tile (VAT) flooring, acoustic ceiling tile (ACT) type ceilings, and concrete masonry unit (CMU) type wall finishes all in fair to poor condition. Corridors are terrazzo and VCT type flooring, ACT type ceilings, and CMU type wall finishes all in fair condition. The restrooms have ceramic tile flooring, ACT type ceilings, and CMU type wall finishes all in fair condition. The 1994 addition has classrooms and corridors with VCT type flooring, ACT type ceilings, and CMU type wall finishes all in fair to poor condition. The restrooms have VCT type flooring, ACT type ceilings, and CMU type wall finishes all in fair condition. Classroom casework throughout is wood type construction with plastic laminate countertops. Casework is inadequately provided, and in poor condition in the original building and adequately provided, and in good condition in the 1994 addition. Typical Classroom chalkboards, markerboards, and tackboards are in fair condition but are not adequately provided. Classrooms have storage cubbies adequately provided, and in fair condition. The Gymnasium space has VCT type flooring, exposed tectum ceilings, and CMU type wall finishes all in poor condition. Gymnasium mobile stands are in fair condition. The facility is equipped with wood louvered interior doors in fair to poor condition. The toilet partitions are metal type construction, and are in fair condition. Student Dining has VAT type flooring, ACT type ceilings, and CMU type wall finishes all in fair to poor condition. The existing kitchen is full service. The existing kitchen equipment is original to the buildings construction and in fair condition. Glass in display cases and interior sidelights did not appear to be safety rated. 3 Needs Replacement Provide complete replacement of finishes and casework in the original building due to condition and installation of systems outlined in Items A, C, D, E, K, N, T, and U. Provide complete replacement of finishes in the 1994 addition due to condition and installation of systems outlined in Items A, C, K, N, and U. Replace kitchen equipment due to age and condition. Replace interior doors due to louvers and condition. (See item O for cost). Replace toilet partitions due to condition and to installation of fixtures outlined in item O. Replace non-compliant wood partitions. Provide safety rated glass in display cases and interior sidelights. Cost Unit Whole Building Original Building Classroom Sum Comments (1966) Addition (1993) 4,410 ft 53,520 ft 4 Required $3,000.00(removing and replacing) Required 1,900 Required 1,432 Required $10,704.00(per building area) $6,650.00 $150,360.00(square footage based upon only area of food preparation, serving, kitchen storage areas and walk-ins. Includes demolition and removal of existing kitchen equipment) $589,480.90Elementary $100,162.60Middle 3,780 Required 630 Required 135 Required $907,846.00 $862,234.00 $45,612.00 $38,934.00Elementary $6,678.00Middle $1,876.50Replace plate glass in display cases and interior sidelights
Item
Toilet Partitions: Toilet Accessory Replacement Demo and Reinstall Drywall Partitions: Total Kitchen Equipment Replacement: Other: Complete replacement of finishes and casework Other: Complete replacement of finishes and casework Other: Complete replacement of finishes Other: Complete replacement of finishes Other: Safety Glazing Sum:
$750.00per stall $0.20sq.ft. $3.50sq.ft. (Qty) $105.00sq.ft. (Qty) $12.85sq.ft. (Qty) $13.10sq.ft. (Qty) $10.30sq.ft. (Qty) $10.60sq.ft. (Qty) $13.90sq.ft. (Qty)
45,874 Required 7,646 Required
Media Center
Gymnasium
Facility Assessment
Page 20
Back to Assessment Summary
Facility Assessment
Page 21
Facility Assessment
K. Interior Lighting
Description:
The typical classrooms in the original facility are equipped with T-8 surface mounted fluorescent fixtures with dual level switching. Classroom fixtures are in fair condition and provide an average illumination of 65 FC, thus complying with the 50 FC recommended by the OSDM. The typical classrooms in the 1994 addition are equipped with T-8 2 x 4 lay-in fluorescent fixtures with dual level switching. Classroom fixtures are in fair condition and provide an average illumination of 60 FC, thus complying with the 50 FC recommended by the OSDM. The typical corridors in the overall facility are equipped with T-8 lay-in or 2x4 surface mounted fluorescent fixtures. Corridor fixtures are in fair condition and provide an average illumination of 45 FC, thus complying with the 20 FC recommended by the OSDM. The gymnasium is equipped with pendant HID type lighting, in fair to poor condition, and providing an average illumination of 30 FC, which is less than the 50 FC recommended by the OSDM. The Media Center is equipped with surface mount T-8 fluorescent fixture type lighting in fair condition, and providing an average illumination of 68 FC, thus complying with the 50 FC recommended by the OSDM. The student dining spaces are equipped with pendant mounted T-8 fluorescent fixture type lighting in fair condition, and providing an average illumination of 26 FC, which is less than the 50 FC recommended by the OSDM. The service areas in the overall facility are equipped with T-8 fluorescent fixture type lighting in fair condition. The typical administrative spaces in the overall facility are equipped with surface mount T-8 fluorescent fixture type lighting in fair condition, and providing inadequate illumination based on OSDM requirements. The overall lighting systems of the facility are not fully compliant with Ohio School Design Manual requirements due to age, condition, and due to inadequate lighting levels. 3 Needs Replacement Provide complete replacement of lighting system due to condition, lighting levels and installation of systems outlined in Items A, C, and U.
Item
Cost Unit Whole BuildingOriginal Building (1966)Classroom Addition (1993)Sum Comments 53,520 ft 4,410 ft Complete Building Lighting Replacement$4.00sq.ft. Required Required $231,720.00 Sum: $231,720.00 $214,080.00 $17,640.00
Classroom Lighting Back to Assessment Summary
Additional Classroom Lighting
Facility Assessment
Page 22
Facility Assessment
L. Security Systems
Description:
The overall facility contains a Z1100 type security system in fair condition. Motion detectors are adequately provided in offices, corridors, and spaces where 6 or more computers are located. Some exterior doors are equipped with door contacts. An automatic visitor control system is not provided. CCTV cameras are provided at main entry areas, parking lots, central gathering areas, and main corridors. CCTV is monitored in administrative area with the use of TV, VCR, and multiplexer. The security system is not fully compliant with Ohio School Design Manual guidelines. The exterior site lighting system is equipped primarily with surface mounted metal halide entry lights in fair to poor condition. Parking and bus pick-up / drop off areas are illuminated by pole mounted metal halide fixtures in fair condition. The exterior site lighting system provides adequate coverage, but some fixtures appear damaged. 2 Needs Repair Provide partial security system upgrade, to meet Ohio School Design Manual guidelines. Provide replacement of exterior site lighting system, to meet Ohio School Design Manual guidelines.
Item
Cost Unit Whole BuildingOriginal Building (1966)Classroom Addition (1993)Sum Comments 53,520 ft 4,410 ft Partial Security System Upgrade:$1.10sq.ft. Required Required $63,723.00(complete, area of building) Exterior Site Lighting: $0.50sq.ft. Required Required $28,965.00building Sum: $92,688.00 $85,632.00 $7,056.00
Damaged Exterior Light Back to Assessment Summary
Camera Monitoring System
Facility Assessment
Page 23
Facility Assessment
M. Emergency/Egress Lighting
Description:
The overall facility is equipped with an emergency egress lighting system consisting of illuminated exit signs and emergency floodlighting. The system is in fair condition, and is provided with appropriate battery backup. The system is adequately provided throughout, and meets Ohio School Design Manual requirements. 3 Needs Replacement Provide complete replacement of emergency / egress lighting system due to work outlined in items J, K, and U.
Item
Cost Unit Whole BuildingOriginal Building (1966)Classroom Addition (1993)Sum Comments 53,520 ft 4,410 ft Emergency/Egress Lighting:$1.00sq.ft. Required Required $57,930.00(w/ battery pack) Sum: $57,930.00 $53,520.00 $4,410.00
Egress Lighting Back to Assessment Summary
Egress Lighting
Facility Assessment
Page 24
Facility Assessment
N. Fire Alarm
Description:
The overall facility is equipped with a fire alarm system in fair condition, consisting of manual pull stations, horn and strobe indicating devices. The system is automatic and is monitored by a third party. The system is not equipped with sufficient flow switches, tamper switches, smoke detectors, or heat sensors. The system is not adequately provided throughout. The system is not fully compliant with Ohio Building Code, NFPA, and Ohio School Design Manual requirements. 3 Needs Replacement Provide complete replacement of fire alarm system to meet NFPA and Ohio School Design Manual guidelines.
Item
Cost Unit Whole BuildingOriginal Building (1966)Classroom Addition (1993)Sum Comments 53,520 ft 4,410 ft Fire Alarm System:$1.50sq.ft. Required Required $86,895.00(complete new system, including removal of existing) Sum: $86,895.00 $80,280.00 $6,615.00
Fire Alarm Panel Back to Assessment Summary
Horn Strobe Indicating Device
Facility Assessment
Page 25
Facility Assessment
O. Handicapped Access
Description:
The exterior entrances are ADA accessible. Access from the parking / drop-off area to the building entries is not compromised by steps or steep ramps. Adequate handicap parking is provided. Exterior doors are equipped with ADA hardware. The main entry is not equipped with an ADA power assist door. Special provisions for floor level changes in this two story structure have been addressed with the addition of a single occupant elevator. Access to the stage is facilitated by a ramp. Some interior doors in the original building are recessed, and are not provided adequate clearances. Interior doors in the original building are not provided with ADA-compliant hardware. 8 ADA-compliant toilets are required, and 4 are currently provided. 8 ADA-compliant lavatories are required, and 3 are currently provided. 4 ADA-compliant urinals are required, and none are currently provided. 7 ADA-compliant electric water coolers are required, and 4 are currently provided. Toilet partitions are metal, and provide appropriate ADA clearances. ADA-compliant accessories are not adequately provided throughout. ADA signage is not provided on both the interior and the exterior of the building. 3 Needs Replacement Provide ADA-compliant signage, power assist door opener, electric water coolers, toilets, sinks, urinals, toilet partitions, toilet accessories, doors and frames in the original facility to facilitate the schools meeting of ADA requirements. Parking issues are corrected in Item P. Unit Whole Building Original Building Classroom Sum Comments (1966) Addition (1993) 53,520 ft 4,410 ft Required Required $5,793.00(per building area) 3 Required $9,000.00(new double ADA) 13 Required 2 Required 1 Required 80 Required 16 Required 8 Required $19,500.00(replacement ADA) $2,000.00(ADA - grab bars, accessories included) $7,500.00(openers, electrical, patching, etc) $120,000.00(standard 3070 wood door, HM frame-classroom door/light, includes hardware) $48,000.00(rework narrow opening to provide 3070 wood door, HM frame, door/light, includes hardware) $30,000.00(rework opening and corridor wall to accommodate ADA standards when door opening is set back from edge of corridor and cannot accommodate a wheelchair. See diagram) $441.00
Item
Cost
Signage: Electric Water Coolers: Toilet/Urinals/Sinks: Toilet Partitions: ADA Assist Door & Frame: Replace Doors: Replace Doors: Replace Doors:
$0.10sq.ft. $3,000.00unit $1,500.00unit $1,000.00stall $7,500.00unit $1,500.00leaf $3,000.00leaf $3,750.00leaf
Sum:
$241,793.00 $241,352.00
Compliant Restroom Back to Assessment Summary
Elevator
Facility Assessment
Page 26
Facility Assessment
P. Site Condition
Description:
The 20 acre gently sloping site is located in a suburban residential setting with generous tree and shrub type landscaping. There are no apparent problems with erosion or ponding. The site is bordered by lightly traveled city streets. A single entrance then breaks into separate parking and bus loading areas allowing for proper separation of bus and other vehicular traffic, and one-way bus traffic is provided. Staff, and visitor parking is facilitated by a 91 space asphalt parking lot in good condition, which provides adequate parking for staff members, visitors, and the disabled. The parking lot drainage design, consisting of proper slopes and catch basins, provides adequate evacuation of storm water, and no problems with parking lot ponding were observed. Concrete curbs in fair to poor condition are appropriately placed. The front concrete sidewalks are properly sloped, are located to provide a logical flow of pedestrian traffic, and are in fair condition. The rear concrete sidewalks are somewhat steep, are located to provide a logical flow of pedestrian traffic, and are in fair condition. The site is not fenced for security. Separation of playground areas from vehicular traffic is moderate. The playground equipment is in fair condition, and on a combination of hard and soft surfaces. The athletic facilities are comprised of a baseball field and soccer nets, and are in fair condition. 2 Needs Repair Provide new asphalt wearing course over entry drive and bus loop area. Replace damaged concrete curb. Replace miscellaneous damaged concrete walks. Replace outdated playground equipment. Cost Unit Whole Building Original Building Classroom Sum Comments (1966) Addition (1993) 4,410 ft 53,520 ft 18,477 Required 1,523 Required $30,000.00(up to $100,000, per sq.ft. of school) Required $5,000.00 28,640 Required 2,360 Required $17,360.00(includes minor crack repair in less than 5% of paved area) 795 Required 65 Required $12,900.00(new) 462 Required 38 Required $2,000.00(5 in exterior slab) Required $50,000.00Include this and one of the next two. (Applies for whole building, so only one addition should have this item) $80,280.00Include this one or the next. (Each addition should have this item) $4,733.10
Item
Playground Equipment: Removal of existing Playground Equipment: Asphalt Paving / New Wearing Course: Concrete Curb: Concrete Sidewalk: Base Sitework Allowance for Unforeseen Circumstances Sitework Allowance for Unforeseen Circumstances for buildings between 0 SF and 100,000 SF Sum:
$1.50sq.ft. (Qty) $5,000.00lump sum $0.56sq.ft. (Qty) $15.00ln.ft. $4.00sq.ft. (Qty) $50,000.00allowance
$1.50sq.ft.
Required
$197,540.00 $192,806.90
Entry Drive Back to Assessment Summary
Outdoor Classroom
Facility Assessment
Page 27
Facility Assessment
Q. Sewage System
Description: Rating: Recommendations:
The sanitary sewer system is tied into the municipal system in good condition. No significant system deficiencies were reported by the School District or noted during the physical assessment. 1 Satisfactory Existing conditions require no renovation or replacement at the present time.
Sanitary Lines Back to Assessment Summary
Manhole
Facility Assessment
Page 28
Facility Assessment
R. Water Supply
Description:
The domestic water supply system is tied in to the municipal system, features 4 service, and is in good condition. The facility is not equipped with an automated fire suppression system, and the existing water supply will not provide adequate support for a future system. The domestic water service is not equipped with a water booster pump, and none is required. The system provides adequate pressure and capacity for the future domestic needs of the school. 1 Satisfactory Existing conditions require no renovation or replacement at the present time.
Service Entrance Back to Assessment Summary
Facility Assessment
Page 29
Facility Assessment
S. Exterior Doors
Description:
Typical exterior doors in the original facility are either aluminum or hollow metal type construction, mounted on corresponding frames, and in fair to poor condition. Entrance doors in the original facility are aluminum type construction, mounted on aluminum frames, and in good condition. Entrance doors feature thermally broken tempered glass vision panels. One coiling overhead door is in fair condition. Typical exterior doors in the 1994 addition are hollow metal type construction, mounted on hollow metal frames, and in poor condition. Typical exterior doors feature single pane vision panels. Entrance doors in the 1994 addition are hollow metal type construction, mounted on hollow metal frames, and in fair condition. Entrance doors feature single pane vision panels. 3 Needs Replacement Replace 3 exterior doors in the original building and 4 exterior doors in the 1994 addition, due to poor condition.
Item
Whole BuildingOriginal Building (1966)Classroom Addition (1993)Sum Comments 53,520 ft 4,410 ft Door Leaf/Frame and Hardware:$2,000.00per leaf 3 Required 4 Required $14,000.00(includes removal of existing) Sum: $14,000.00 $6,000.00 $8,000.00
Cost
Unit
HM Door in Addition
Aluminum Entrance Door Back to Assessment Summary
Facility Assessment
Page 30
Facility Assessment
T. Hazardous Material
Description:
The School District provided the AHERA three year reinspection reports, prepared by Paran Consulting Services, and dated January 2002, documenting known and assumed locations of asbestos and other hazardous materials. Vinyl asbestos floor tile and mastic, heater mastic, and a transite tabletop containing hazardous materials are located in the original building in fair condition. These materials were described in the report to be in non-friable condition. There are no underground storage tanks on the site. Due to the construction date, there is a potential for lead based paint. Fluorescent lighting will require special disposal. 2 Needs Repair Remove all hazardous materials, inclusive of asbestos-containing materials in the original building, as noted in the attached Environmental Hazards Assessment. Provide for the testing of paint that has the potential of being lead-based. Provide for disposal of fluorescent lighting. Cost Unit Whole Building Original Building (1966) 53,520 ft EHA Form 24,940 Required 5,000 Required 5,000 Required 50,844 Required 4,600 Required Required Required $91,962.00 $221.00 Classroom Addition (1993) 4,410 ft EHA Form 0 Required 0 Required 0 Required 4,410 Required Sum Comments
Item
Environmental Hazards Form Resilient Flooring Removal - Incl. Mastic
$3.00sq.ft. (Qty) Estimated Cost For Abatement Contractor to Perform Lead $1.00per unit Mock-Ups Special Engineering Fees $1.00per unit Fluorescent Lamps & Ballasts Recycling/Incineration $0.05sq.ft. (Qty) Other: EHA ACM Other $1.00per unit Other: T Discrepancies from Old EHA System (Renovation $0.50lump only) sum Other: T Discrepancies from Old EHA System (Renovation -$0.20lump only) sum Sum: $92,183.00
$74,820.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $2,762.70 $4,600.00heater Mastic & countertop $0.50T Discrepancies From Old EHA System -$0.20T Discrepancies From Old EHA System
Vinyl Asbestos Floor Tile Back to Assessment Summary
Asbestos Countertop
Facility Assessment
Page 31
Facility Assessment
U. Life Safety
Description:
The overall facility is not equipped with an automated fire suppression system. Exit corridors are situated such that dead-end corridors are not present. Stair towers are not protected by a two hour fire enclosure. Guardrails are constructed with vertical bars with less than 4 inch clearance as required by the Ohio Building Code. The kitchen hood is equipped with a fire suppression system. There is an adequate number of fire extinguishers that are adequately spaced. The existing water supply is provided by a tie-in to the municipal system, and is insufficient to meet the future fire suppression needs of the school. Rooms with capacity greater than 50 are equipped with adequate egress. 3 Needs Replacement Provide a new automated fire suppression system to meet Ohio School Design Manual guidelines. The required service piping increase for the fire suppression system is included in the cost table pricing. Provide new handrails to meet the requirements of the Ohio Building Code. Provide fire-rated enclosure around existing stair tower. Cost Unit Whole Building Original Building (1966) 53,520 ft 53,520 Required 1 Required 2 Required $203,272.50 $188,940.00 Classroom Addition (1993) 4,410 ft 4,410 Required Sum Comments
Item
Sprinkler / Fire Suppression System: Interior Stairwell Closure: Handrails: Sum:
$3.25sq.ft. (Qty) $5,000.00per level $5,000.00level
$188,272.50(includes increase of service piping, if required) $5,000.00(includes associated doors, door frames and hardware) $10,000.00
$14,332.50
Kitchen Hood Back to Assessment Summary
Unprotected Stair Tower
Facility Assessment
Page 32
Facility Assessment
V. Loose Furnishings
Description:
The typical classroom furniture is mismatched, and in generally fair condition, consisting of student desks & chairs, teacher desk & chair, reading table, computer workstation, bookcases, and wastebasket. The facilitys furniture and loose equipment was evaluated in item 6.17 in the CEFPI section of this report, and on a scale of 1 to 10 the facility received a rating of 6 due to observed conditions, and due to the fact that it lacks some of the Design Manual required elements. 3 Needs Replacement Provide for replacement of outdated or inadequate furniture.
Item
Cost Unit Whole BuildingOriginal Building (1966)Classroom Addition (1993)Sum Comments 53,520 ft 4,410 ft CEFPI Rating 6$3.00sq.ft. Required Required $173,790.00 Sum: $173,790.00 $160,560.00 $13,230.00
Cafeteria Furniture Back to Assessment Summary
Music Furniture
Facility Assessment
Page 33
Facility Assessment
W. Technology
Description:
The typical classroom is not equipped with the required four technology data ports for student use, one data port for teacher use, one voice port with a digitally based phone system, one cable port and monitor to meet Ohio School Design Manual requirements. A 2-way PA system that can be initiated by either party does not exist. The facility does contain a media distribution center, and provides computer labs for use by students. 3 Needs Replacement Provide complete replacement of technology systems to meet Ohio School Design Manual requirements.
Item
Cost Unit Whole BuildingOriginal Building (1966)Classroom Addition (1993)Sum Comments 53,520 ft 4,410 ft Non-OSDM Compliant:$5.77sq.ft. Required Required $334,256.10 Sum: $334,256.10 $308,810.40 $25,445.70
Technology Closet Back to Assessment Summary
Typical Technology Outlet
Facility Assessment
Page 34
Facility Assessment
X. Construction Contingency / Non-Construction Cost

Renovation Costs (A-W) 7.00% Subtotal 16.20% Non-Construction Costs Construction Contingency $5,045,616.60 $353,193.16 $5,398,809.76 $874,607.18 $6,273,416.94
Total Project
Construction Contingency Non-Construction Costs Total for X.
$353,193.16 $874,607.18 $1,227,800.34
Non-Construction Costs Breakdown Soil Borings Agency Approval Fees Construction Testing Printing Advertising Builders Risk Design Professional Compensation CM Compensation Non-Construction Contingency (includes partnering and mediation services) Total Non-Construction Costs Back to Assessment Summary 0.03% 0.20% 0.15% 0.30% 0.05% 0.20% 7.50% 6.00% 1.77% 16.20% $1,619.64 $10,797.62 $8,098.21 $16,196.43 $2,699.40 $10,797.62 $404,910.73 $323,928.59 $95,558.93 $874,607.18
Facility Assessment
Page 35
School Facility Appraisal
Name of Appraiser Building Name Street Address City/Town, State, Zip Code Telephone Number(s) School District
Bill Mentges Maddux Elem 943 Rosetree Lane Cincinnati, OH 45230 513-231-0780 Forest Hills Local SD
Date of Appraisal
2004-06-03
Setting: Site-Acreage Grades Housed Number of Teaching Stations Student Enrollment Dates of Construction Energy Sources: Air Conditioning: Heating:
Suburban 20 K-6 35 617 1966,1993 Fuel Oil Roof Top Central Hot Water Gas Windows Units Roof Top Steam Floor Construction Wood Joists Steel Joists Slab on grade Structural slab Electric Central Individual Unit Solar Room Units Forced Air Building Square Footage Student Capacity Number of Floors 57,930 417 2
Type of Construction Load bearing masonry Steel frame Concrete frame Wood Steel Joists
Exterior Surfacing Brick Stucco Metal Wood Stone
Page 36
CEFPI Ratings Sheet
1.0 The School Site

Points Allocated
Points
1.1
Site is large enough to meet educational needs as defined by state and local requirements The 20 acre site is smaller than the 26.5 acres recommended by OSDM for a combination school per current enrollment.
25
20
1.2
Site is easily accessible and conveniently located for the present and future population The site is centered within the population it serves and allows for many walking students.
20
17
1.3
Location is removed from undesirable business, industry, traffic, and natural hazards The site has residential surroundings.
10
1.4
Site is well landscaped and developed to meet educational needs The landscaping is mature and well placed.
10
1.5
ES MS HS
Well equipped playgrounds are separated from streets and parking areas Well equipped athletic and intermural areas are separated from streets and parking Well equipped athletic areas are adequate with sufficient solid-surface parking
10
The playground is well equipped with hard and soft surfaces available which are away from traffic. One piece of equipment is an older wood device that causes splinters.
1.6
Topography is varied enough to provide desirable appearance and without steep inclines Gently sloping site provides desirable appearance.
1.7
Site has stable, well drained soil free of erosion Soil is free from erosion and appears to be stable.
1.8
Site is suitable for special instructional needs, e.g., outdoor learning An outdoor classroom is available.
1.9
Pedestrian services include adequate sidewalk with designated crosswalks, curb cuts, and correct slopes
Front sidewalks correctly sloped, crosswalks, and curb cuts exist. Some sidewalks toward Weatherridge Avenue limit pedestrian access due to steep slopes.
1.10
ES/MS HS
Sufficient on-site, solid surface parking for faculty and staff is provided Sufficient on-site, solid surface parking is provided for faculty, students, staff and community
Sufficient solid surface parking exists and is in good condition.
TOTAL - The School Site Back to Assessment Summary
100
83
CEFPI Ratings Sheet
Page 37
CEFPI Ratings Sheet
2.0 Structural and Mechanical Features

Structural
Points Allocated
Points
2.1
Structure meets all barrier-free requirements both externally and internally ADA requirements are met with regards to entry and vertical circulation but many other areas require revision.
15
2.2
Roofs appear sound, have positive drainage, and are weather tight Low slope roofing provides adequate drainage. The District did not report any roof leaks.
15
10
2.3
Foundations are strong and stable with no observable cracks Minor cracking was observed in the foundations.
10
2.4
Exterior and interior walls have sufficient expansion joints and are free of deterioration The facility is equipped with sufficient expansion joints, but minor wall deterioration was still observed.
10
2.5
Entrances and exits are located so as to permit efficient student traffic flow Building entrances are properly located for the efficient flow of traffic.
10
2.6
Building envelope generally provides for energy conservation (see criteria) Composite masonry walls with poured insulation, insulated roof, and thermally broken windows provide an adequate building envelope.
10
2.7
Structure is free of friable asbestos and toxic materials
10
According to the report provided by the District, hazardous materials exist. See the worksheet at the end of this report for a summary of hazardous materials.
2.8
Interior walls permit sufficient flexibility for a variety of class sizes Folding partitions are available for varying class sizes.
10
Mechanical/Electrical
Points Allocated
Points
2.9
Adequate light sources are well maintained, and properly placed and are not subject to overheating Light fixtures appeared to be well maintained. Darks spots were not observed.
15
11
2.10
Internal water supply is adequate with sufficient pressure to meet health and safety requirements
15
Water supply is from a municipal system, has a backflow preventer, and has adequate pressure for domestic service, but is insufficient for future fire suppression.
2.11
Each teaching/learning area has adequate convenient wall outlets, phone and computer cabling for technology applications
15
A typical classroom is equipped with 4 electrical outlets, 0 phone, and 3 computer outlets. The facility does not meet the OSDM technology requirements.
2.12
Electrical controls are safely protected with disconnect switches easily accessible
10
CEFPI Ratings Sheet
Page 38
Locked electrical panels are located in student occupied areas.
2.13
Drinking fountains are adequate in number and placement, and are properly maintained including provisions for the disabled
10
The O.B.C. requires one drinking fountain per 100 students. The building capacity requires 6 drinking fountains. The existing facility has 4 drinking fountains. ADA requires that 50 percent of drinking fountains be accessible. 4 of the drinking fountains are accessible.
2.14
Number and size of restrooms meet requirements
10
The O.B.C. requires that restrooms be located on every floor and that the maximum travel distance shall not exceed 500 feet. The facility meets the requirement. The size of the restrooms is such that ADA access is achievable.
2.15
Drainage systems are properly maintained and meet requirements The waste piping is cast iron. The District reported that no problems existed with the drainage system.
10
2.16
Fire alarms, smoke detectors, and sprinkler systems are properly maintained and meet requirements
10
The fire alarm system does not meet current code requirements. Detection devices are not properly located. There is no sprinkler system.
2.17
Intercommunication system consists of a central unit that allows dependable two-way communication between the office and instructional areas The PA system provides two way communication that can be initiated from either party.
10
2.18
Exterior water supply is sufficient and available for normal usage Hose bibbs are located near areas where water is needed.
TOTAL - Structural and Mechanical Features Back to Assessment Summary
200
135
CEFPI Ratings Sheet
Page 39
CEFPI Ratings Sheet
3.0 Plant Maintainability

Points Allocated
Points
3.1
Windows, doors, and walls are of material and finish requiring minimum maintenance Aluminum windows, aluminum, steel, wood doors and CMU walls require moderate maintenance.
15
12
3.2
Floor surfaces throughout the building require minimum care
15
10
Typical classrooms have vinyl asbestos or vinyl composite tile flooring. Typical corridors have vinyl asbestos tile or terrazzo flooring. Typical restrooms have ceramic tile or vinyl composite tile flooring.
3.3
Ceilings and walls throughout the building, including service areas, are easily cleaned and resistant to stain
10
The lay-in acoustic ceiling panels are not resistant to stain and must be replaced when damaged. Painted wall surfaces are cleaned easily.
3.4
Built-in equipment is designed and constructed for ease of maintenance Built-in equipment is constructed of plastic laminate and wood which requires maintenance.
10
3.5
Finishes and hardware, with compatible keying system, are of durable quality The hardware does not have a quality finish and is not ADA accessible. Keying system is adequate.
10
3.6
Restroom fixtures are wall mounted and of quality finish
10
Toilets are wall mounted flush valve. Urinals are wall mounted flush valve. Lavatories are wall mounted. ADA requirements are met in four restrooms. The fixtures are in fair condition.
3.7
Adequate custodial storage space with water and drain is accessible throughout the building Custodial closets with mop sink are available throughout the building. Storage is limited.
10
3.8
Adequate electrical outlets and power, to permit routine cleaning, are available in every area Electrical outlets are located as required for cleaning.
10
3.9
Outdoor light fixtures, electrical outlets, equipment, and other fixtures are accessible for repair and replacement Outdoor light fixtures provide adequate light levels in all areas. Outdoor mechanical equipment is easily accessible.
10
TOTAL - Plant Maintainability Back to Assessment Summary
100
69
CEFPI Ratings Sheet
Page 40
CEFPI Ratings Sheet
4.0 Building Safety and Security

Site Safety
Points Allocated
Points
4.1
Student loading areas are segregated from other vehicular traffic and pedestrian walkways The facility is equipped with a separate bus loop.
15
12
4.2
Walkways, both on and offsite, are available for safety of pedestrians
10
Correctly sloped sidewalks, with crosswalks and curb cuts exist in the front of the facility. Pedestrian access is limited due to steep slopes on the Weatherridge Avenue entrance.
4.3
Access streets have sufficient signals and signs to permit safe entrance to and exit from school area School signs are provided to permit safe site access.
4.4
Vehicular entrances and exits permit safe traffic flow Single entrance separates into bus loop/delivery/parking area.
4.5
ES MS HS
Playground equipment is free from hazard Location and types of intramural equipment are free from hazard Athletic field equipment is properly located and is free from hazard
The playground is well equipped with hard and soft surfaces available which are away from traffic.
Building Safety
Points Allocated
Points
4.6
The heating unit(s) is located away from student occupied areas The mechanical room is located away from student areas. Unit ventilators are located in student occupied areas.
20
15
4.7
Multi-story buildings have at least two stairways for student egress Stairways exist to provide the amount of egress required, but they are not in fire rated enclosures per code requirements.
15
4.8
Exterior doors open outward and are equipped with panic hardware Exterior doors open outward per O.B.C. requirements and have panic hardware.
10
10
4.9
Emergency lighting is provided throughout the entire building with exit signs on separate electrical circuits The exit lighting is powered by battery backup.
10
4.10
Classroom doors are recessed and open outward
10
Most classroom doors are recessed with allowable ADA clearances. Doors open outward. Doors are louvered as a function of the mechanical system corridor return air plenum which is a code violation. Some doors did not have allowable ADA clearances.
CEFPI Ratings Sheet
Page 41
4.11
Building security systems are provided to assure uninterrupted operation of the educational program The facility is equipped with a security system with the following features: cameras, CCTV, motion detectors, and door contacts.
10
4.12
Flooring (including ramps and stairways) is maintained in a non-slip condition The stairs do not have non-slip pads. The entry doors did not have step off mats.
4.13
Stair risers (interior and exterior) do not exceed 6 1/2 inches and range in number from 3 - 16 The stair risers measure 7 inches and typically fall into the acceptable range.
4.14
Glass is properly located and protected with wire or safety material to prevent accidental student injury Glass in interior doors, display cases, and exterior door assembly did not appear to be properly protected.
4.15
Fixed Projections in the traffic areas do not extend more than eight inches from the corridor wall Drinking fountains extend more than the allowable dimension.
4.16
Traffic areas terminate at an exit or a stairway leading to an egress There are no dead end corridors in the facility.
Emergency Safety
Points Allocated
Points
4.17
Adequate fire safety equipment is properly located The number of fire extinguishers appears to meet the requirements. The kitchen hood is equipped with a fire suppression system.
15
15
4.18
There are at least two independent exits from any point in the building
15
10
Rooms with capacity greater than 50 persons are equipped with two exits. There are no dead end corridors in the facility. Classrooms that are divided with folding partitions, when opened, have a capacity greater than 50 persons and exits are not remote from one another to meet code.
4.19
Fire-resistant materials are used throughout the structure The entire building structure is constructed with non-combustible materials.
15
15
4.20
Automatic and manual emergency alarm system with a distinctive sound and flashing light is provided An emergency alarm system exists, but it is not equipped with all of the code required indicating devices.
15
10
TOTAL - Building Safety and Security Back to Assessment Summary
200
154
CEFPI Ratings Sheet
Page 42
CEFPI Ratings Sheet
5.0 Educational Adequacy

Academic Learning Space
Points Allocated
Points
5.1
Size of academic learning areas meets desirable standards The average size of classrooms is 876 s.f. compared to 900 s.f. recommended by the OSDM.
25
20
5.2
Classroom space permits arrangements for small group activity The classrooms are of moderate size allowing for somewhat affective small group arrangements.
15
10
5.3
Location of academic learning areas is near related educational activities and away from disruptive noise Most classrooms are remote from rooms with noisy functions.
10
5.4
Personal space in the classroom away from group instruction allows privacy time for individual students No designated personal space is present.
10
5.5
Storage for student materials is adequate Cubby areas are available for the storage of elementary student supplies. Condition is fair.
10
5.6
Storage for teacher materials is adequate Some casework is provided for teacher material storage. Condition is fair.
10
Special Learning Space
Points Allocated
Points
5.7
Size of special learning area(s) meets standards The average size of special education areas is similar to that recommended by the OSDM.
15
12
5.8
Design of specialized learning area(s) is compatible with instructional need Very few special education provisions are made. Special education classrooms similar to standard classrooms.
10
5.9
Library/Resource/Media Center provides appropriate and attractive space Space is cluttered and not well layed out.
10
5.10
Gymnasium (or covered P.E. area) adequately serves physical education instruction The existing gym is 3,299 s.f. compared to the 3,500 s.f. recommended by the OSDM.
5.11
ES MS/HS
Pre-kindergarten and kindergarten space is appropriate for age of students and nature of instruction Science program is provided sufficient space and equipment
10
The average size of kindergarten classrooms is 1,100 compared to 1,200 s.f. recommended by the OSDM.
CEFPI Ratings Sheet
Page 43
5.12
Music Program is provided adequate sound treated space The size of the music room is less than the OSDM recommendation. Sound treatment is fair.
5.13
Space for art is appropriate for special instruction, supplies, and equipment The size of the art room is less than the OSDM recommendation. Equipment is in good condition.
Points Allocated
Points
5.14
Space for technology education permits use of state-of-the-art equipment Computer labs are too small for proper arrangement of stations.
5.15
Space for small groups and remedial instruction is provided adjacent to classrooms Small project rooms are located near classrooms.
5.16
Storage for student and teacher material is adequate
Cubby areas are available for the storage of elementary student supplies. Condition is fair. Inadequate casework is provided for teacher material storage. Condition is fair.
Support Space
Points Allocated
Points
5.17
Teachers lounge and work areas reflect teachers as professionals Teachers lounge is small with dated furnishings and finishes.
10
5.18
Cafeteria/Kitchen is attractive with sufficient space for seating/dining, delivery, storage, and food preparation
10
The kitchen is significantly smaller than the OSDM standards. The cafeteria size is less than the size recommended by the OSDM. The finishes are fair.
5.19
Administrative offices provided are consistent in appearance and function with the maturity of the students served Administrative offices do not contain all the elements and are smaller than OSDM recommendations.
5.20
Counselors office insures privacy and sufficient storage Counselor has private office. Storage is poor.
5.21
Clinic is near administrative offices and is equipped to meet requirements Clinic is equipped with toilet, sink, and 2 cots. Location is near offices.
5.22
Suitable reception space is available for students, teachers, and visitors Reception space is too small to adequately serve the need.
5.23
Administrative personnel are provided sufficient work space and privacy Work space is smaller than OSDM recommendations. Some OSDM elements are not provided.
TOTAL - Educational Adequacy
200
129
CEFPI Ratings Sheet
Page 44
CEFPI Ratings Sheet
Page 45
CEFPI Ratings Sheet
6.0 Environment for Education

Exterior Environment
Points Allocated
Points
6.1
Overall design is aesthetically pleasing to age of students Interesting design with good site placement.
15
14
6.2
Site and building are well landscaped The landscaping is mature and well placed.
10
6.3
Exterior noise and poor environment do not disrupt learning The surrounding neighborhood is a residential type.
10
10
6.4
Entrances and walkways are sheltered from sun and inclement weather
10
The main entrance is sheltered but the secondary entrances are not. There is a covered walkway which leads to the bus drop area.
6.5
Building materials provide attractive color and texture Brick walls with aluminum windows and doors provide attractive appearance.
Interior Environment
Points Allocated
Points
6.6
Color schemes, building materials, and decor provide an impetus to learning Colors are very monotone.
20
10
6.7
Year around comfortable temperature and humidity are provided throughout the building
15
The facility is equipped with a heating system only. The heating system is in fair condition. Cooling and humidity control are provided in media center, computer lab, art, music and office areas.
6.8
Ventilating system provides adequate quiet circulation of clean air and meets 15cfm VBC requirement The existing unit ventilator system does not provide the code required amount of fresh air.
15
6.9
Lighting system provides proper intensity, diffusion, and distribution of illumination Light fixtures appeared to be well maintained. Darks spots were not observed.
15
11
6.10
Drinking fountains and restroom facilities are conveniently located
15
The O.B.C. requires one drinking fountain per 100 students. The building capacity requires 6 drinking fountains. The existing facility has 4 drinking fountains. ADA requires that 50 percent of drinking fountains be accessible. Four of the drinking fountains are accessible. The O.B.C. requires that restrooms be located on every floor and that the maximum travel distance shall not exceed 500 feet. The facility meets the requirement. The size of restrooms is such that ADA access is achievable.
6.11
Communication among students is enhanced by commons area(s) for socialization A commons area does exist, but size and decor limits function.
10
CEFPI Ratings Sheet
Page 46
6.12
Traffic flow is aided by appropriate foyers and corridors Corridors are approximately the width that is recommended by the OSDM.
10
6.13
Areas for students to interact are suitable to the age group Media center, gym, and cafeteria are smaller than OSDM guidelines. Commons areas are provided, but limited.
10
6.14
Large group areas are designed for effective management of students Large group areas are not provided with a sound system. There are no blind spots where supervision is limited.
10
6.15
Acoustical treatment of ceilings, walls, and floors provides effective sound control Lay-in acoustic ceilings, masonry walls, and vinyl tile floor provide fair acoustics.
10
6.16
Window design contributes to a pleasant environment Nicely sized, well placed, well maintained windows contribute to a pleasant environment.
10
6.17
Furniture and equipment provide a pleasing atmosphere The equipment appeared to be mismatched and was in fair condition.
10
TOTAL - Environment for Education Back to Assessment Summary
200
136
CEFPI Ratings Sheet
Page 47
Justification for Allocation of Points
Building Name and Level:
Maddux Elem K-6
Building features that clearly exceed criteria: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Building features that are non-existent or very inadequate: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Back to Assessment Summary No fire suppression system. Hazardous materials in facility. Unprotected stair tower. Outdated technology. Outdoor classroom donated by former teacher.
Justification for Allocation of Points
Page 48
Building Summary - Maddux Elem (21949)

100.44% $6,301,019.98
$238,660.00 - The Replacement Cost Per SF and the Renovate/Replace ratio are only provided when this summary is $0.00 - requested from a Master Plan. $537,048.00 $322,020.00 $3,300.00 $0.00 $65,180.00 $0.00 $907,846.00 $231,720.00 $92,688.00 $57,930.00 $86,895.00 $241,793.00 $197,540.00 $0.00 $0.00 $14,000.00 $92,183.00 $203,272.50 $173,790.00 $334,256.10 $1,227,800.34 $6,273,416.94 Previous Page
Total
Page 49
Environmental Hazards - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Maddux Elem (21949) - Original Building Environmental Hazards - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Maddux Elem (21949) - Original Building
Owner: Facility: Date:
Forest Hills Local SD Maddux Elem 2004-06-08
Bldg. IRN: BuildingAdd: Assessor:
21949 Original Building Tony Zircher
A. Asbestos Containing Material (ACM) ACM Found 1. Boiler/Furnace/Breeching Insulation Removal 2. Tank/Duct Insulation Removal 3. Pipe Insulation Removal 4. Pipe Fitting Insulation Removal 5. Acoustical Plaster Removal 6. Fireproofing Removal 7. Hard Plaster Removal 8. Gypsum Board Removal 9. Acoustical Panel Ceiling Removal 10. Resilient Flooring Removal - Incl. Mastic 11. Roofing Removal 12. heater Mastic & countertop 11 Sum of lines(1-12) 12 Sum of lines(1-9, 12) B. Removal Of Underground Storage Tanks Tank No. 1 Sum Of Lines(1-0) Location
AFM=Asbestos Free Material Status Quantity Unit Cost Estimated Cost Not Present 0 $15.00 $0.00 Not Present 0 $12.00 $0.00 Not Present 0 $8.00 $0.00 Not Present 0 $25.00 $0.00 Not Present 0 $7.00 $0.00 Not Present 0 $20.00 $0.00 Not Present 0 $10.00 $0.00 Not Present 0 $6.00 $0.00 Not Present 0 $3.00 $0.00 Reported Asbestos-Containing Material 24940 $3.00 $74,820.00 Not Present 0 $2.00 $0.00 Reported Asbestos-Containing Material lump sum $4,600.00 Total Abs. Hazard Abatement Cost for Renovation Work $79,420.00 Total Abs. Hazard Abatement Cost for Demolition Work $4,600.00 None Reported Age Product Stored Size Total Cost For Removal Of Underground Storage Tanks Est.Rem.Cost $0.00
C. Lead-Based Paint (LBP) - Renovation Only 1. Estimated Cost For Abatement Contractor to Perform Lead Mock-Ups 2. Special Engineering Fees 3 Sum of lines(1-2) D. Fluorescent Lamps & Ballasts Recycling/Incineration Area Of Building Addition 1 53520 50844 E. Other Environmental Hazards/Remarks 1. (Sum of Lines 1-0) Description Total Cost for Other Environmental Hazards
Addition Constructed after 1980 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 Total Cost for Lead-Based Paint Mock-Ups $10,000.00 Not Applicable Total Cost $2,542.20
Square Feet w/Fluorescent Lamps & Ballasts
Unit Cost $0.05
None Reported Cost Estimate $0.00
F. Environmental Hazards Assessment Cost Estimate Summaries 1. A11, B1, C3, D1, and E1 2. A12, B1, D1, and E1
Total Cost for Env. Hazards Work - Renovation Total Cost for Env. Hazards Work - Demolition
$91,962.20 $7,142.20
<Untitled>
Page 50
Environmental Hazards - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Maddux Elem (21949) - Classroom Addition Environmental Hazards - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Maddux Elem (21949) - Classroom Addition
Owner: Facility: Date:
Forest Hills Local SD Maddux Elem 2004-07-21
Bldg. IRN: BuildingAdd: Assessor:
21949 Classroom Addition Tony Zircher AFM=Asbestos Free Material Estimated Cost $15.00 $0.00 $12.00 $0.00 $8.00 $0.00 $25.00 $0.00 $7.00 $0.00 $20.00 $0.00 $10.00 $0.00 $6.00 $0.00 $3.00 $0.00 $3.00 $0.00 $2.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 None Reported
A. Asbestos Containing Material (ACM) ACM Found 1. Boiler/Furnace/Breeching Insulation Removal 2. Tank/Duct Insulation Removal 3. Pipe Insulation Removal 4. Pipe Fitting Insulation Removal 5. Acoustical Plaster Removal 6. Fireproofing Removal 7. Hard Plaster Removal 8. Gypsum Board Removal 9. Acoustical Panel Ceiling Removal 10. Resilient Flooring Removal - Incl. Mastic 11. Roofing Removal 12. None 11 Sum of lines(1-12) 12 Sum of lines(1-9, 12) B. Removal Of Underground Storage Tanks Tank No. 1 Sum Of Lines(1-0) Location
Status Quantity Unit Cost Not Present 0 Not Present 0 Not Present 0 Not Present 0 Not Present 0 Not Present 0 Not Present 0 Not Present 0 Not Present 0 Not Present 0 Not Present 0 Not Present lump sum Total Abs. Hazard Abatement Cost for Renovation Work Total Abs. Hazard Abatement Cost for Demolition Work
Age
Product Stored Size Total Cost For Removal Of Underground Storage Tanks
Est.Rem.Cost $0.00
C. Lead-Based Paint (LBP) - Renovation Only 1. Estimated Cost For Abatement Contractor to Perform Lead Mock-Ups 2. Special Engineering Fees 3 Sum of lines(1-2) D. Fluorescent Lamps & Ballasts Recycling/Incineration Area Of Building Addition 1 4410 4410 E. Other Environmental Hazards/Remarks 1. (Sum of Lines 1-0) Description Total Cost for Other Environmental Hazards
Addition Constructed after 1980 $0.00 $0.00 Total Cost for Lead-Based Paint Mock-Ups $0.00 Not Applicable Total Cost $220.50
Square Feet w/Fluorescent Lamps & Ballasts
Unit Cost $0.05
None Reported Cost Estimate $0.00
F. Environmental Hazards Assessment Cost Estimate Summaries 1. A11, B1, C3, D1, and E1 2. A12, B1, D1, and E1
Total Cost for Env. Hazards Work - Renovation Total Cost for Env. Hazards Work - Demolition
$220.50 $220.50
<Untitled>
Page 51

State Assessment, Maddux

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

State Assessment, Maddux

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Building Information - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Maddux Elem (21949)

Building Information - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Maddux Elem (21949)

Report Generated at 19 May 2005 06:43

Building Pictures - Forest Hills Local SD(47340) - Maddux Elem(21949)

North elevation photo:

East elevation photo:

South elevation photo:

West elevation photo:

Building Pictures - Forest Hills Local SD(47340) - Maddux Elem(21949)

Report Generated at 19 May 2005 06:43

Previous Page Next Page

Building Pictures - Forest Hills Local SD(47340) - Maddux Elem(21949)

Report Generated at 19 May 2005 06:43

Building Information - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Maddux Elem (21949)

Building Information - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Maddux Elem (21949)

Report Generated at 19 May 2005 06:43

Name Original Building

Year Handicapped Access Floors Square Feet 1966 no 2 1 53,520 4,410

Classroom Addition 1993 yes Previous Page Next Page

Report Generated at 19 May 2005 06:43

Addition Original Building (1966) Classroom Addition (1993)

Auditorium Corridors 8634 597

Previous Page Next Page

Report Generated at 19 May 2005 06:43

Report Generated at 19 May 2005 06:43

Building Summary - Maddux Elem (21949)

Address: 943 Rosetree Lane

Classroom Addition 1993 yes

Report Generated at 19 May 2005 06:43

Original Building (1966) Summary

Address: 943 Rosetree Lane

Classroom Addition 1993 yes

Report Generated at 19 May 2005 06:43

Classroom Addition (1993) Summary

Address: 943 Rosetree Lane

Classroom Addition 1993 yes

Report Generated at 19 May 2005 06:43

Gymnasium Air Handler Back to Assessment Summary

Report Generated at 19 May 2005 06:43

EPDM Roof Back to Assessment Summary

Report Generated at 19 May 2005 06:43

C. Ventilation / Air Conditioning

Rooftop Condensing Unit Back to Assessment Summary

Air Conditioning Unit

Report Generated at 19 May 2005 06:43

4 Required 16 Required $537,048.00 $529,848.00 $7,200.00

Main Panels Back to Assessment Summary

Report Generated at 19 May 2005 06:43

E. Plumbing and Fixtures

Domestic Supply Piping: Domestic Water Heater: Toilet:

$3.50sq.ft. $5,100.00per unit $1,500.00unit

Wall Mounted Urinals Back to Assessment Summary

Classroom Sink with Bubbler

Report Generated at 19 May 2005 06:43

Original Building Windows Back to Assessment Summary

1994 Addition Windows

Report Generated at 19 May 2005 06:43

Concrete Foundation Wall Back to Assessment Summary

Concrete Foundation Wall

Report Generated at 19 May 2005 06:43

H. Structure: Walls and Chimneys

Original Building Back to Assessment Summary

Damaged Exterior Wall

Report Generated at 19 May 2005 06:43