Family Courts Charging Fathers on False, Unsubstantiated, Unverified Testimony by Mothers.

Mothers/Women, are never/rarely, held to account for lying in the courtroom. A standard procedure, recommended by Lawyers when filing for divorce, especially where children are involved, is to make a false sexual assault claim against the Father. This is normal practise as it ensures that the judge will be more inclined to allocate the custody of the children to the Mother, as the Father will automatically be seen as being the abuser. The court will accept this claim without any verification or proof, it does not require any witnesses or a doctor's report, for verification of the claimed physical harm or emotional trauma to be accepted. It does not require any other affirmation or verification by witnesses. It is solely accepted on the verbal accusation of the Mother. The accusation is the only proof required. That practice negates standard applications of the law, as whenever anyone has any grievance or claim against anyone else, there must be a basis for that claim to proceed. Evidence has to be supplied and presented, with documentation and witnesses called, in order to establish a case and proceed with a trial to determine guilt or innocence. No Evidence Required. The family courts requires no such evidence or procedures to be followed. The woman's word is established as being sufficient evidence of itself, as the accusation is apparently evidence enough for the Judge to determine guilt without the right of a defence or argument. The Male Partner or Father is automatically deemed guilty. This happens on a daily basis, in just about every Family Court as far as I am aware. If it can be established by the accused that he is indeed innocent of the claim, via his attorney or lawyer, if he is fortunate enough to be able to afford one (as the mothers are always allocated a free lawyers, via sexist and selective programs for women only), the father can argue his case and be found not guilty. Breakdown of Abuse on Children by Parents.

When that eventuates, and it does very rarely, the Judge, on only very rare exceptions, will charge

the woman with false testimony. But this is so rare and infrequent as to hardly ever be covered in the media or spoken of by witnesses in court cases of this type. I have personally heard from many Fathers, who were falsely accused by their ex-wives, only to find that they were never charged for lying in court and the entire episode was completely ignored by the Judge while still allocating custody of the children to the mother. This happens every single day, without fail. It is one of the most cruelest actions that includes an obvious, complete miscarriage of justice. This action is favoured by the family courts as conviction would place the female in prison, but which also demonstrates complete and total bias against the Father, while also ensuring that the Father is completely removed from his own child or children's lives by no fault of his own. Monitoring Family Court, Required. There is no monitoring system or methods in place on the family courts and judgement in most cases are kept secret. The Fathers therefore have no legal claims to follow up, due to either lack of finance to pay for lawyers fees or because of crippling alimoney and child support payments. He inturn finds it impossible to pay for defending himself against those false claims. They will normally just accept the ruling if it means that they can spend at least some time with his children rather than no time at all. This is of course a complete miscarriage of justice, changes need to be made in order to ensure that justice is carried out properly. The actions of the Family Courts need changes to be instigated. Those requirements should be the following, in order to ensure that Fathers are not vilified, granted detrimental action them and/or be falsely accused of a crime that he did not commit. The recommendations are as follows Recommendations for a fairer, equal, carriage of justice for Fathers and his Children. 1/ Whenever the Mother is allocated a free lawyer, the Father should be offered the same. 2/ Fathers can have access to court documents at will without cost. 3/ A Father cannot be charged with any crime or claim, in the family courts without substantial evidence being provided. 4/ If the mother does make a false claim, which the court finds to be false. A strict fine or prison sentence must be given to discourage this type of actions in the future. As a false claim can destroys a man's life and the punishment should be appropriate. 5/ The presumption of 50/50 child sharing arrangement must be introduced as standard practice, if there are no evidence of child abuse or cruelty from both parents. It is currently the case that mothers are more abusive to children than Fathers and yet the Father very rarely receives any consideration of being the main carer or sole parent of the child. Here is just one recent example of the courts actions against a Dad, from Mike Adams. Abusing Due Process Dr. Mike Adams Professor, Faculty Member & Lecturer on Criminal Law at UNC-Wilmington. North Carolina, USA. Totalitarianism is brewing in the heartland. An Indiana inmate is now serving two years for voicing his online opinions against a judge who took away his child-custody rights during a divorce case. I know the custody case pretty well having written about it in 2009. But Im

convinced that the free speech case that is brewing in its aftermath heaps an even greater injustice upon an existing one. And Im convinced it is showing the darker side of a dangerous man who needs to be stopped. Dan Brewington is justifiably angry because James Humphrey took his kids away from him based on a report by an unlicensed psychologist. During the custody battle, Judge Humphrey also failed to provide adequate justification for his decisions as mandated by Indiana law. But that just makes him a bad judge. What he allowed to happen in the wake of Brewingtons reaction makes Humphrey downright dangerous. The above is just one example on how men are automatically excluded from their child/ren's lives at the behest of the mother and the father has no other course of action but to follow the court's biased and sexist conditions. This too, happens every single day. Here is just one example of a mother abusing a small boy. Refer to the above chart for breakup of child abuse instigated by Father or Mother. Yet the courts automatically allocate child/ren to mothers even though they are the greater abusers of children. Totally unjustified and completely unfair as it does not take the best interest of the child in consideration at all. Local home inspector working near Pittsburgh hears screams; police find boy severely beaten By Kelly Camarote and NEWS9 COLUMBIANA COUNTY, Ohio A home inspector from Wellsville may have saved a young boy's life in the Pittsburgh area. John McClelland was in Duquesne, Pa., completing a property inspection when he heard screams nearby and called police. "I just knew by the sound of the voice that it was a young kid just screaming for help just saying, 'Please stop, please stop,'" McClelland said. "The yelling stopped and I heard snaps of the belt and I thought this kid might be unconscious and that's when I called 911." He had little information for police, but enough to give officers a reason to enter the house. "I don't know who he is. I didn't see him. That's all I did was hear. But I knew where it was coming from and what address it was coming from and there was no mistake of that," McClelland said. Inside the home, police said they found a severely beaten 7-year-old boy who they said was being held inside a home by his mother. Police said the boy was covered in bruises, welts and blood, and socks were duct-taped to his hands and feet. Investigators said Brenda Thompson, 28, told police she made her son wear socks on his hands so his teachers wouldn't see his bruises.