Professional Documents
Culture Documents
nates on the ellipsoid, and on the field calculations had to be simple step is a Gauss-Schreiber Transverse
other part the rectangular topo- to employ and therefore rectangular Mercator projection of the sphere
graphic surveys accumulated a sub- coordinates were used. Since the onto a cylinder that is symmetri-
stantial error. In 1925, regions quite Bonne Projection was useless, provi- cally secant about the central merid-
removed from the Bonne Axis of sional local coordinates systems ian of the projection. The third step
projection, notably the delta region were improvised. Between 1925-26 in forming the Laborde Projection is
of Mangoky in the southwest part of four local projections were put into a conformal distortion of the plane
Madagascar, attained errors of 22' service based on the Gauss Confor- through a rotation in the secant
for angles and ±1/580 for lengths. It mal Projection. (Ed. note: The ac- case. Beginning with the first step
was decided to find another solu- tual math model used for all four (the conformal projection of the el-
tion urgently so that the quality was the Gauss-Schreiber Transverse lipsoid on the sphere), Laborde fol-
would not be compromised for the Mercator.) The Laborde Projection, lowed Gauss. Gauss showed that
survey campaign of 1925. Pressed adopted in 1926, was put into full the ellipsoid could be mapped con-
for time, a local provisional projec- use for the reduction of the calcula- formally on the sphere in such a
tion was adopted in which the dis- tions of the 1926 geodetic survey way that the distortions in the neigh-
tortions were practically negligible campaign and for the topographic borhood of some chosen point are of
within the region of application. survey campaign of 1927.” the third order or higher. Also note
Furthermore, difficulty was encoun- The Laborde Projection is a triple that the indirect or double projection
tered in recruiting specialized per- conformal projection, designed to through the sphere is not exactly
sonnel, and in 1926, the triangula- have two lines of zero scale error the same as the direct one in that
tion operations were constrained for oblique to the meridian. The pro- they differ concerning the higher or-
lack of officers. Since training had jection of the ellipsoid onto the der terms of the expanded transfor-
to be furnished to the personnel be- plane is carried out in three steps; mation formulae. The conformal
cause of the isolation of the survey the first is the projection of the el- projection of the ellipsoid on the
parties do to the topography; the lipsoid on the sphere. The second CONTINUED ON PAGE 144
CONTINUED FROM PAGE 143 (on the complex plane) with the 16' 52.6884 East of Greenwich, East-
sphere was used by the Prussian UTM as a unifying tool. Laborde ing (Y) = 174896.590 m, Northing
Land Survey in 1876-1923 as the did this back in the 1920’s, and the (X) = 644433.000 m, (H = 31.421 m).
foundation for a double projection, Russians do it in an attempt to ob- Back in September of 1992, the late
and it is currently used in computa- fuscate the relation between their John P. Snyder asked for a copy of my
tions for cadastral retracement. “System 42 Datum” (Pulkovo origin) 1982 stuff on the Laborde Projection of
This triple projection of Laborde’s, and the WGS 84 Datum. The Rus- Madagascar. After John diddled a
using the Gaussian Sphere to sians still do it in the 21 st century while with trying to see how close the
achieve an Oblique Mercator, is fun- by using their screwy “System 1963” Hotine Rectified Skew Orthomor-
damentally different from the meth- series of local coordinates which are phic (RSO) Oblique Mercator would
od used some 20+ years later by merely translated and rotated fit, he concluded that he could
Brigadier Martin Hotine of the UK. Gauss-Krüger Grids. However, match my transformations to only
Most commercial software houses Laborde’s implementation for Mada- “about 0.08 meters for my part of
that I have noticed are abysmally ig- gascar was successful in simplifying Madagascar … worse of course away
norant on this point. (I’ll grouse on the task! from the island.” This approxima-
this later.) Laborde’s command of the Ser- tion is of interest for U.S. Geologi-
In reference to the four provi- vice Géographique de Madagascar cal Survey medium scale cartogra-
sional coordinate systems men- also resulted in the establishment of phic applications, but it is useless
tioned earlier by Laborde, he later the unifying coordinate system for for geodetic work and for large scale
commented on the relation of these the colony. After long observation, engineering mapping. I have seen
local systems to the Laborde Projec- the coordinates of the observatory in examples of much (apparent) hand
tion. His discussion referred to the the capital of Antananarivo were wringing done by software organiza-
1925-1926 local triangulation situ- used as the origin of the Madagas- tions (U.S. and elsewhere), that
ated in the region of Bemolanga- car Datum of 1925 where: have attempted to foist this sort of
Morafenobe. The work was carried F o = -18° 55' 02.10" South, “work-around” on government agen-
out over 4,200 km 2 , and was com- Lo = 47° 33' 06.45" cies in Madagascar. The Grid is
prised of 127 geodetic triangulation East of Greenwich. Of course, the commonly used at great distances
points calculated on a provisional ellipsoid of reference is the Interna- from the mainland because of the
Gauss-Schreiber Transverse Merca- tional 1924. The defining param- existence and official publication of
tor coordinate system. Two points eters were published by the retired a False Easting at False Origin!
of an old reconnaissance triangula- General Jean Laborde in the seminal The RSO is not a valid substitute for
tion were chosen as a base for a lo- work, “Traitè des Projections des the Laborde of Madagascar.
cal grid. This grid was “une projec- Cartes Géographiques a L’Usage des The U.S. National Imagery and
tion conforme de Gauss limitée,” a Cartographes et des Geodèsiens,” by Mapping Agency (NIMA) publishes
Gauss conformal projection of lim- L. Driencourt & J. Laborde, Paris, a parameter set for transforming
ited extent. Laborde further com- 1932. Remember Driencourt? He from the Madagascar Datum of 1925
mented that the transformation from performed the 1904 final astronomi- (“Tananarive 1925”) to WGS 84 Da-
the provisional system to the cal observations for the longitude of tum. However, they offer no infor-
Laborde Oblique Mercator was one Antsirana Datum of 1906. mation on accuracy of, or the origin
translation, one rotation, and a Driencourt later became the Hydrog- of, the parameters. I tried a nine
change of scale without any defor- rapher of the French Navy (long be- point solution and I obtained slight-
mation, “sans acune déformation.” fore the four volume book was pub- ly different results as:
This is an implementation of one of lished). Those parameters are: DX = -191.745 m, DY = -226.365 m,
the most valuable properties of con- Latitude of Origin (f o) = - 21 G South and DZ = -115.609 m. The resultant
formal projection: the ability to (-18° 54'), Central Meridian rms for Latitude = 0.215 m, for Lon-
maintain the undistorted shape of (lo) = 21G East of Paris (46° 26' 13.95" gitude = 0.323 m, and for ellipsoid
surveys and mappings through East of Greenwich), Scale Factor at height (h) = 9.958 m. The WGS 84
simple 3-parameter (translation in Origin (m o) = 0.9995, False Easting Datum observed coordinates for
X, translation in Y, and rotation) = 400 km, False Northing = 800 km, Morondava are: f = - 20° 17'
transformations! In my past column Azimuth of Axis of Strength (q) 39.079425" South, l = 44° 16'
on Belgium, I discussed how the = 21 G, and the False Easting at the 51.545430 East of Greenwich, and
U.S. Army Map Service imple- False Origin = 1,000 km. For exam- h = 31.421 meters.
mented the European Datum 1950 by ple, for geodetic station Morondava, ............
such 3-parameter transformations f = -20° 17' 34.2443" South, l = 44°