GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION REPORT

FOR

CLIENT GALENTIC PHARMA PVT. LTD.

LOCATION PLOT NO. 5B & 5C, KASEZ, GANDHIDHAM

FORWARDED TO. SANJAY THACKER & ASSOCIATES

REPORT NO. GES / ADI / SBCBH / 12-13 / 2102002 / 287, DATED :01/03/2013

INDEX

DESCRIPTION 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. ABSTRACT SITE CONDITION NATURE OF INVESTIGATION LABORATORY TEST DESIGN PROCEDURES GEOPHYSICAL INVESTIGATION RESULTS CONCLUSION & RECOMMENDATION ANNEXURE I

Page No. 2 3 4 4 4 5 7 8 9 13

10. ANNEXURE II

Job No. 2102002-287

1.0

ABSTRACT

We (Geo Engineering Services, Adipur) have carried out the Geotechnical Investigation, which covers the field sampling and tests, necessary laboratory tests and finally analyzing the sub soil characteristics and behavior of the soil of the proposed site. The detailed scope of work was decided by client and as per the instruction of Engineer in-charge. A complete geotechnical investigation work was undertaken to obtain the required subsurface information to study and define the nature and behavior of soil, under the application of loads of proposed structures. Such information was obtained through following steps: By making bore hole and collecting disturbed and undisturbed soil samples Performing required in situ tests (SPT Test). Plate Load Test Conducting laboratory tests to classify it and to determine the engineering properties of soil. Electric Resistivity Test for Earth Resistance.

The objective of the geotechnical investigation was to explore the sub soil profile up to predetermined depth and to work out the design capacity of the soil beneath at a required foundation depth for the proposed type of foundation. Following pages represents the conceptual investigation and analysis based on the geotechnical investigation and study and presenting the same as a detailed report. An analysis was made to derive the allowable bearing capacity, taking into considerations the anticipated settlements and the present soil conditions with future possibilities. Based on such analysis of the soil properties, the conclusions are made regarding the precautions and protective measures to be taken, if found necessary. This report has been prepared after a careful study of the field testing and laboratory test results. The type and depth of foundation are suggested in following pages.

Job No. 2102002-287

2.0 SITE CONDITION : 2.1 LOCATION: - The site is located at Plot No. 5B & 5C, KASEZ, Gandhidham 2.2 FIELD WORK: - The site investigation work was started 15th February, 2013 and completed on 17th February, 2013 2.3 GROUND WATER TABLE: - Water table was encountered 3.0m below G.L. during the sub soil exploration work. 2.4 SUB SOIL PROFILE: - The field data and laboratory classification reveal that, entire stratum comprises of Brownish clayey sand of intermediate plasticity to highly weathered stone fragments to the depth termination of borehole. Detail stratification is mentioned in the bore log. 2.5 GEOLOGY OF THE AREA: - The Kachchh district comprises litho units of the Mesozoic sediments; the Deccan Volcanic; the Palaeogene & Neogene sediments of Tertiary age & the Quaternary sediments. The youngest sediments belong to the Holocene period & are represented by the Rann Clay & Mahuva Formation (marine); Rann Formation (fluvio-marine); Katrol & Varahi Formations (fluvial) ; & Jantral Formation (aeolian). The study area geologically, comprises of unconsolidated sedimentary strata (Rann Clay and Mud deposits) of Holocene age. Figure 2 depicts the general geology of the study area.

Figure 2: Genera Geology of the Study area

(Source: Geological Survey of India, District Resource Map, 2002)

2.6 SUITABILITY OF SOIL: - The sub soil bears good property for use as back filling.
Job No. 2102002-287 3

3.0 NATURE OF INVESTIGATION: 3.1 BORE HOLES: - Two nos. of boreholes were conducted by rotary drilling boring up to 10.0 mtr depth. Boring was carried out in accordance with IS: 1892 and the undisturbed soil samples were collected in thin walled tube as per IS: 2132 - 1986 were sealed packed and brought to our laboratory at Adipur for further investigation. During boring, Standard Penetration Test (SPT) was conducted at every 1.5 m intervals as per requirements. The disturbed and undisturbed samples were collected at every 1.50m. 3.2 SAMPLING: - During the advancement of the boring Disturbed and Undisturbed samples are collected at every 1.5m interval or at the change of strata whichever occurs earlier. Along with the samplings, field Standard Penetration Tests is conducted to co-relate the strata denseness & stiffness. Detail procedures are briefed in Annexure I. 3.3 ELECTRIC RESISTIVITY : Electric Resistivity Test was carried out at 1 locations 4.0 LABORATORY TESTS: - Following laboratory tests were carried out to determine the physical and engineering properties of undisturbed and disturbed soil samples. Detail procedures are explained in Annexure - I. a. Field Dry Density & Field Moisture Content b. Atterberg's Limits c. Particle size distribution d. Specific Gravity e. Unconfined Compressive Strength 5.0 DESIGN PROCEDURES: - Intensity of bearable load determined as soil bearing capacity (SBC) and soil bearing pressure (SBP) on soil. Calculations for both these are carried out considering shear parameters & consolidation characteristics of the sub strata. 5.1 SBC BASED ON SHEAR: - The ultimate net bearing capacity is evaluated after taking into consideration of shape factor and depth factor of the foundation in accordance with I.S. 64031981. The net bearing capacity worked out using the following equation. Q = C Nc Sc dc + q (Nq -1) Sq dq + 0.5 B Nr Sr dr Where, C q
Job No. 2102002-287

f. Shear Parameters i.e. C g. Consolidation characteristic

h. Swelling Parameters i. Chemical Analysis of Soil & Water

= Cohesion = Overburden Pressure

4

 Density B Width of the Footing Bearing capacity Factor = Shape Factor = Depth Factor

Nc,Nq,Nr Sc,Sq,Sr dc,dq,dr

5.2 SAFE BEARING PRESSURE: - (IS: 8009 Part I) The Settlement calculation involves many simplifying assumptions. In the present state of knowledge, the settlement computations at best

estimate the most probable magnitude of settlement. The total settlement is computed as summation of immediate and secondary settlement. St = Si + Sc Where, Si is Immediate Settlement Si = p B (1 - 2) I E 2 Where, p = Foundation Pressure, kg/cm B = Width of Footing, m I = Influence Factor = Poissons Ratio E = Modulus of Elasticity, kg/cm2 Sc is Secondary Settlement Sc = Ht Cc Log10 (po + p) (1+eo) po Where, Ht = Thickness of Soil Layer, m Cc = Compression Index eo = Initial Void Ratio po = Initial Effective Pressure p = Increase in effective pressure 6.0 GEOPHYSICAL INVESTIGATION: 6.1 INTRODUCTION: - The Geo Electrical Investigation of soil were carried out at the project of Galentic Pharma (I) Pvt. Ltd, Kandla with the aim to determine an average value of electrical resistivity of soil for design of safety earthing system for substation. The investigation was carried out on 16/02/2013. Figure 1 depicts the location map of the Kandla.
Job No. 2102002-287 5

6.2 PURPOSE OF INVESTIGATION: - The purpose of this investigation is to determine an average value of electrical resistivity of subsurface for design of safety earthing system with the help of Microprocessor based electrical resistivity meter model no.SSRMP-ATS. 6.3 WENNERS CONFIGURATION: - This is one of the most commonly used arrays proposed by Wenner in 1916. Four electrodes A, B, M, and N are placed at the surface of the ground along a straight symmetrically about a point O. The observation point in such a way that the distance between AM = MN =NB = a., Where a is called electrode separation see fig. 1. Current I is sent generally through outer electrodes A and B and the potential difference (V) are measured between M and N. The configuration factor (K) for this array is K = 2 a And apparent Resistivity, which is used for further analysis, is calculated with formula; a = KR = 2aR

I
V

A a

M a

N a

Figure 1: Wenners Configuration 6.4 SURVEY PROCEDURE: - Resistivity sounding is used to make investigations along the depth. In this method the center of configuration is kept fixed and measurements are made by successively increasing electrode spacing. The apparent resistivity values obtained with increasing values of electrode separations are used to estimate the thickness and resistivity of the subsurface formations. In Wenner configuration all the four electrodes are arranged in a line at a equal distance a between the consecutive electrodes. Measurements are taken by increasing the electrode separation gradually changing from small value; say 1.0m to several tens and hundreds of meters depending on the depth of the investigations required. Current is generally sent through the outer electrodes and the potential difference is measured between the inner electrodes. The Resistance (R = V/I) is measured for each electrode separation and apparent resistivity is calculated by multiplying value of R with Wenner

Job No. 2102002-287

configuration factor (2a). The computation of the sounding data is discussed in the subsequent section. 6.5 COMPUTATION OF EARTH RESISITIVITY: - When the earth resistivity readings for different electrode spacing in a direction are within 20 to 30%, the soil is considered to be uniform. When the spacing is increased gradually from low values, at a stage, it may be found that the resistivity readings are more or less constant irrespective of the increase in the electrode spacing. The resistivity for this spacing is noted and taken as the resistivity for that direction. In a similar manner, resistivity for at least eight equally spaced directions from the center of the site is measured. This resistivity is plotted in a graph sheet in the appropriate directions choosing a scale. A closed curve is plotted on the graph sheets jointing all the resistivity points plotted to get the polar resistivity curve. The area inside the polar resistivity curve is measured and equivalent circle of the same area is found out. The radius of this equivalent circle is the average resistivity of the site under consideration. The average resistivity thus obtained may be used for the design of the earthing grid. 7.0 RESULTS 7.1 CHEMICAL RESULTS OF WATER SAMPLE Sr. No. 1 2 3 TESTS pH Value Sulphate (as SO3), mg/l Chlorides (as Cl), mg/l At 3.00m below G.L. 6.8 4024 1053 IS: 456 2000 Acceptance Criteria 6.5 - 8.5 400 mg/l Max 500 mg/l Max (for RCC Work)

7.2 CHEMICAL RESULTS OF SOIL SAMPLE Sr. No. Description 1 2 3 pH Chloride Sulphate Unit --mg/kg % At 1.5mtr 6.9 1134 1.53 At 3.0mtr 7.1 595 1.03

Job No. 2102002-287

7.3 RESULTS OF ELECTRIC RESISTIVITY Measured subsurface resistivity data is given in field data sheets. Summary of results & locations of measurement points are shown in sketch in graphical & tabular form. The first two electrodes spacing i.e. 1m and 2m verage resistivity value may be of filling of foreign material. Average Resistivity Value (Ohm m) Sr.No Location 1 1 ERT-01 74.62 2 50.84 Electrode Spacing (in m) 3 23.25 4 18.70 5 15.95 6 12.61 8 13.81 10 15.95

8.0 CONCLUSION & RECOMMENDATION: - Looking to the types of proposed structure and the soil strata encountered, following conclusions are drawn and recommendations are given accordingly. (i) The R.C.C Isolated Foundation is recommended as below. (ii) The depth of foundation may be selected as per design requirement and site feasibility. (iii) Safe load carrying capacity and Safe bearing pressure may be taken as under. TABLE OF SAFE BEARING CAPACITY AND SAFE BEARING PRESSURE FOUNDATION DETAILS Type R.C.C. Column footing NOTE: 1. The ground water table was encountered and hence considered in the analysis. However it is not suitable for construction purpose as per IS 456. 2. Factor of Safety considered is 2.5.
3. The sub soil is not suitable for the back filling purpose.

Size in Mt. 2.0 x 2.0 3.0 x 3.0 4.0 x 4.0

Depth in Mt. 2.00

Safe Bearing Capacity, T/m2

+25

4. Due to high Chloride content with Sulphates in Soil, it is recommended to use OPC cement with C3A content from 5% - 8%. Alternatively, Portland Slag Cement confirming to IS 455 having more than 50% slag or a blend of OPC and slag may be used. The minimum cement content should be 370 kg/cm3 and maximum water cement ratio of 0.45. 5. The foundation shall in no mean rest on Filled up Soil or Black Cotton Soil.
Job No. 2102002-287 8

6. If in the course of excavation, if sub soil strata differs from the bore log strata the same shall be reported for necessary steps. 7. For Intermediate footing size the value of SBC shall be interpolated. No Extrapolation is allowed. 8. Least of SBP and SBC shall be considered as the allowable bearing capacity in the design. For, GEO ENGINEERING SERVICES

Authorized Signatory

Job No. 2102002-287

9.0 ANNEXURE - I 9.1 SAMPLING: 9.1.1 Disturbed soil samples: - Disturbed samples were collected during the boring and also from the split spoon sampler. The samples recovered were logged, labeled and placed in polythene bags and sent to laboratory for testing. The samples collected at every 1.50m depth. 9.1.2 Undisturbed soil samples: - Undisturbed soil samples were collected in 75mm diameter Shelby tubes at every 1.50 m depth at the site location. The sampler used for the sampling had smooth surface and appropriate area ration and cutting edge angle thereby minimizing disturbance of soil during sampling. The samples were sealed with wax, labeled and transported to our laboratory at Vadodara for testing. Sampler was coupled together with a sampler head to form a sampling assembly. The sampler head provide a non-flexible connection between the sampling tube and the drill rods. Vent holes are provided in the sampler head to allow escape of water from the top of sampler tube during penetration. Coating of oil is applied on both sides to obtain the undisturbed samples in best possible manner. The sampler was then lowered inside the borehole on a string of drill rods and was driven to pre-determined level. On completion of driving the sampler was first rotated within the borehole to shear the soil sample at bottom and then pulled out. The disturbed material in the upper end of the tube, if any, is completely removed before applying wax for sealing. The soil at the lower end of the tube is trimmed to about 10 to 15 mm. After trimming, both ends are sealed with wax applied in such a way that will prevent the soil from giving up from its sample. The polythene bags cover both the ends. The identification mark was then made on each sample. 9.1.3 Standard Penetration Tests: - SPT is conducted in accordance with IS: 2131-1981 in bores holes at every change of strata or at an interval of 1.50m depth in uniform strata. The test gives N-value; the blow counts of last 30cm of penetration of the split spoon sampler with 65kg. Hammer falling freely from 75cm height. The rods to which the sampler is attached for driving are straight, tightly coupled and straight in alignment. There after the split spoon sampler is further driven by 30cm. The number blows required to drive each 15cm penetration is recorded. The first 15cm penetration is termed as a seating value. The last 30cm penetration termed as N Value. Respective tables and bore logs in the report shows the detail of N value.

10

9.2

LABORATORY TEST PROCEDURES:

9.2.1 Field Dry Density & Field Moisture Content: Field dry density and Field moisture content were carried out in accordance with I.S. 2720 (Part-2 1983). The field density is found out by following equation. The value of F.D.D. & F.M.C. is shown in summary table. Field Density (bulk) = Weight of soil mass / Volume of soil mass And Field Dry Density = Bulk Density/ (1 + w), Where w is field moisture content. 9.2.2 Atterbergs Limit: - Liquid limit and Plastic limits are carried out for the determination of different characteristic of soil. The tests performed in accordance with I.S.2720 P-5-1985 by using con penetrometer. Liquid limit and plastic limit of soils are both depend up on the amount and type of clay in a soil and form the basis for the soil classification system for cohesive soils based on the Plasticity index. The liquid limit of the soil with corresponds to the moisture content of a paste which would give 20mm penetration of the cone is determined by using following formula. WL = Wx / (0.65+0.0175*X). Where, X = Penetration of cone in the sample Wx = Moisture Content of the soil sample at the respective penetration For Plastic Limit, a soil sample weighing at least 20 gm of the soil sample passing 425 micron IS sieve is thoroughly mixed with water such that it can be easily molded with fingers. A ball is formed with about 8 to 10 gm of this soil and is rolled between the fingers and the glass plate with just sufficient pressure to roll the mass into a thread of uniform diameter of 3mm throughout its length. The soil is kneaded to a uniform mass and rolled again. The process is continued until the thread crumbles. The pieces of crumbled soil thread are collected for moisture content determination and reported as plastic limit. Values of LL, PL & PI are shown in summary 1. 9.2.3 Particle Size Distribution (IS: 2720 Part IV): -The sieve analysis is carried out in accordance with IS. The results are shown in the summary-1. 9.2.4 Specific Gravity (IS: 2720 Part 3): - In order to determine specific gravity of soil particles these tests were conducted on Selected samples in 50ml volumetric density bottle using procedure described in IS. The value of Specific Gravity is shown in summary 2. 9.2.5 Triaxial Shear Test: Triaxial shear (Quick) tests are conducted to determine the shear parameters of clayey samples. The shear tests are carried out in accordance with IS: 2720 (part X, XI, XII & XIII). For unconsolidated undrained (Quick) Triaxial compression test, the specimen having dia 38mm and height to diameter ration of 2 is prepared and placed on the pedestal of the triaxial cell after enclosing
Job No. 2102002-287 11

it in rubber membrane. The cell is then assembled with the loading ram and then placed in the loading machine. The fluid is admitted to the cell and the pressure is raised to the desired value. Initial reading of the gauge measuring the axial compression of the specimen is recorded. The test is then commenced and sufficient number of simultaneous readings of load and compression measuring gauge being taken. The test is continued until the maximum value of the stress has been reached or until an axial strain of 20 percent has been attained. The test is carried out at confining stress of 0.5, 1.0, 1.5 and 2.0 kg/cm2. The shear parameters are obtained from a plot of Mohr circles. 9.2.6 Consolidation Test (IS: 2720 Part XV): -Test was carried out on undisturbed soil specimen in order to determine the settlement characteristics of soil at different depths. Sample is extruded to the consolidation ring of 60mm dia. The edge is trimmed carefully such that the sample flushes with the top and bottom edges of the ring. The thickness of the specimen is measured and the weight is recorded. The bottom porous stone is then centered on the base of the consolidation cell. The specimen is placed centrally between the bottom porous stone and the upper porous stone. A filter paper is provided in-between specimen and porous stones. The consolidometer is placed in position in the loading device and suitably adjusted. Dial gauge is clamped into position for recording the relative movement between the base of the cell and the loading cap. A seating pressure of 0.05 kg / sq. cm is applied to the specimen. The cell is kept filled with water. After 24 hrs the test is continued using a loading sequence on the soil specimen of 0.25, 0.50, 1.00, 2.00, 4.00 & 8.00 kg / sq. cm. For each loading increment after application of load, readings of the dial gauge is taken using time sequence 0, 0.25, 1.00, 2.25, 2, 6.25, 9, 16, 25, 36, 49 upto 24 hrs. From the observations of all incremental pressure, void ratio versus log (pressure) curve is obtained. The slope of the straight line portion shows compression index Cc. 9.2.7 Differential Free Swell test (IS: 2720 (P-40, 41)): -In order to determine the swelling characteristics of the soil, differential free swell test is carried out. An oven dried soil sample, 10 gm passing through 425 micron is poured in two 100 ml graduated cylinder. One cylinder was filled with distilled water and in kerosene up to 100 ml mark. After the removal of entrapped air, sample was allowed sufficient time to attain equilibrium state of volume. The final volume of soil in each cylinder was recorded. Sp = Free swell Soil volume in water Soil volume in kerosene Sp = Soil volume in kerosene
Job No. 2102002-287 12

ANNEXURE II

Electric Resistivity Data

SURVEY DATA SHEET Resistance R=V/I Ohm E 13.167 3.06 0.816 0.459 0.319 0.331 0.263 0.232 W 2.389 1.193 0.682 0.459 0.362 0.351 0.249 15.271 14.987 12.852 11.529 11.374 13.25 12.541 3.021 1.393 0.767 0.491 0.366 0.336 0.287 84.158 38.456 15.386 11.537 10.019 12.492 13.242 14.549 7.686 3.545 1.411 0.86 0.493 0.348 0.264 0.226 NW 19.307 17.501 14.45 12.328 11.506 12.651 14.414 36.689 6.606 1.781 0.993 0.539 0.368 0.245 Resistivity 'r' = 2paR Ohm-m Resistance R=V/I Ohm SE 49.128 44.553 26.602 21.618 15.486 13.13 13.245 14.212 7.057 4.172 0.864 0.477 0.407 0.338 0.265 0.225 N 234.498 83.009 33.576 24.945 16.943 13.855 12.308 24.362 5.962 1.81 1.008 0.538 0.365 0.243 Resistivity 'r' = 2paR Ohm-m Resistance R=V/I Ohm S 45.103 52.429 16.279 11.997 12.782 12.755 13.332 14.128 1.014 0.702 0.584 0.461 0.39 0.31 0.318 0.272 NE 155.711 74.922 34.109 25.339 16.896 13.747 12.233 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 8.00 Resistivity 'r' = 2paR Ohm-m Resistance R=V/I Ohm SW 6.48 8.82 11.003 11.578 12.265 11.681 15.995 17.101 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 8.00 10.00 Resistivity 'r' = 2paR Ohm-m Spacing, ' a' m

13

14

Job No. 2102002-287

15

Job No. 2102002-287

16

Job No. 2102002-287

17

BORE LOG
Bore Hole No. : BH - 1 Location: Plot No. 5B & 5C, KASEZ, Gandhidham Type of Boring : Machine Drilling Water Table : 3.00 m below G.L. Date Started : 15/02/2013

Date Completed : 15/02/2013 Diameter of Boring : 150mm Depth of Boring: 10 mt below E.G.L.

Dept h in mt 0.0 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.2 1.5 1.8 2.1 2.4 2.7 3.0 3.3 3.6 3.9 4.2 4.5 4.8 5.1 5.4 5.7 6.0 6.3 6.6 6.9 7.2 7.5 7.8 8.1 8.4 8.7 9.0 9.3 9.6 10.0

Description of Strata Brownish poorly graded medium to fine sand

SP

Corrected Sampling Stratum SPT Thickness Depth, Value, Type Lab. No. , mt mt. 'N' DS 5016-10 0.0 -0.35 UDS 5016-11 0.6

Legend

SPT Curve

Plot of N-Value / Depth Penetration Value "N"

10 20 30 40 50 60 0
0.0

Brownish yellowish clayey sand of intermediate plasticity mixed with gravel SC 2.75 SPT 5016-12 1.8 31

2.0

UDS 5016-13 SPT

3.0 3.3 >75

4.0

Core 5016-14

4.8

--

Depth Below G.L., m

6.0

Core 5016-15 Brownish highly weathered sand stone fragements HWR 6.90

6.0

--

8.0

Core 5016-16

7.8

-10.0

Core 5016-17

9.0

--

12.0

Core 5016-18 DS : Disturbed sample

10.0

Abbreviation: UDS : Undisturb Sample SPT : Corrected Standard Penetration Value

Job No. 2102002-287

18

BORE LOG
Bore Hole No. : BH - 2 Location: Plot No. 5B & 5C, KASEZ, Gandhidham Type of Boring : Machine Drilling Water Table : 3.00 m below G.L. Date Started : 16/02/2013

Date Completed : 17/02/2013 Diameter of Boring : 150mm Depth of Boring: 10 mt below E.G.L.

Dept h in mt 0.0 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.2 1.5 1.8 2.1 2.4 2.7 3.0 3.3 3.6 3.9 4.2 4.5 4.8 5.1 5.4 5.7 6.0 6.3 6.6 6.9 7.2 7.5 7.8 8.1 8.4 8.7 9.0 9.3 9.6 10.0

Description of Strata Brownish poorly graded medium to fine sand

SP

Corrected Sampling Stratum SPT Thickness Depth, Value, Type Lab. No. , mt mt. 'N' DS 5016-10 0.0 -0.30 UDS 5016-11 0.6

Legend

SPT Curve

Plot of N-Value / Depth Penetration Value "N"

10 20 30 40 50 60 0

Brownish yellowish clayey sand of intermediate plasticity mixed with gravel SC 3.10 SPT 5016-12 1.8 36
0.0

2.0

UDS 5016-13 SPT

3.0 3.3 >75

4.0

Core 5016-14

4.8

--

Depth Below G.L., m

6.0

Core 5016-15 Brownish highly weathered sand stone fragements HWR 6.60

6.0

--

8.0

Core 5016-16

7.8

-10.0

Core 5016-17

9.0

--

12.0

Core 5016-18 DS : Disturbed sample

10.0

Abbreviation: UDS : Undisturb Sample SPT : Corrected Standard Penetration Value

Job No. 2102002-287

19

SUMMARY -1
M.C. / Grain Size Distribution Atterberg's limit Density Water %M& gm/cc Absorptio % G %S LL, % PL, % PI, % C n% -1.714 -1.846 -1.861 -1.884 --8.46 -7.52 -9.14 -8.33 -1 31 14 26 81 38 43 45 18 31 43 29 24.0 49.0 46.0 59.0 21.0 20.0 25.0 NA NA NA NA NA NP 28.0 26.0 34.0
Location

Lab. No.

Depth in m 0.0 0.6 1.5 3.0 4.5 6.0 7.5 9.0 10.0

I.S. Classification SP SC SC SC HWR HWR HWR HWR HWR

210200210 210200211 210200212 210200213 210200214 210200215 210200216 210200217 210200218

BH 1

SUMMARY -2
Location

Specific Depth in Lab. No. Gravity m G 210200210 210200211 210200212 210200213 210200214 210200215 210200216 210200217 210200218 0.0 0.6 1.5 3.0 4.5 6.0 7.5 9.0 10.0 --2.609 2.612 ------

Shear Parameters Consolidation

kg/cm2 Degree --0.19 0.24 -------25.0 27.0 ------

Cc
---0.034 ------

Pc
kg/cm2 ---0.62 ------

Swell Free Pressure, Swell, % kg/cm2 ---40 ---------------

Abbreviations: G- Gravel, S- Sand, M- Silt, C- Clay M.C. - Moisture Content LL- Liquid Limit PL- Plastic Limit PI - Plasticity Index C - Unit Cohesion f - Angle of Internal Friction Cc - Compression Index Pc - Pre-Consolidation Pressure

Job No. 2102002-287

BH 1

20

SUMMARY -1
Grain Size Distribution Atterberg's limit M.C. / Density Water %M& gm/cc Absorptio % G %S LL, % PL, % PI, % C n% -1.642 -1.824 -1.872 -1.896 --9.41 -8.23 -7.14 -7.32 -1 21 8 25 71 42 62 26 28 37 30 49 26.0 43.0 55.0 57.0 16.0 19.0 26.0 NA NA NA NA NA NP 27.0 36.0 31.0
Location

Lab. No.

Depth in m 0.0 0.6 1.5 3.0 4.5 6.0 7.5 9.0 10.0

I.S. Classification SP SC SC SC HWR HWR HWR HWR HWR

210200220 210200221 210200222 210200223 210200224 210200225 210200226 210200227 210200228

BH-2

SUMMARY -2
Location

Specific Depth in Lab. No. Gravity m G 210200220 210200221 210200222 210200223 210200224 210200225 210200226 210200227 210200228 0.0 0.6 1.5 3.0 4.5 6.0 7.5 9.0 10.0 --2.612 2.618 ------

Shear Parameters Consolidation

c
kg/cm --0.21 0.26 -----2

f
Degree --20.0 26.0 ------

Cc
---0.036 ------

Pc
kg/cm2 ---0.67 ------

Swell Free Pressure, Swell, % kg/cm2 ---35 ---------------

Abbreviations: G- Gravel, S- Sand, M- Silt, C- Clay M.C. - Moisture Content LL- Liquid Limit PL- Plastic Limit PI - Plasticity Index C - Unit Cohesion f - Angle of Internal Friction Cc - Compression Index Pc - Pre-Consolidation Pressure

Job No. 2102002-287

BH 2

21

Job No. 2102002-287

22